Advances in Pure Mathematics, 2013, 3, 381-389
http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/apm.2013.34055 Published Online July 2013 (http://www.scirp.org/journal/apm)
The Integrals of Entwining Structure
Yuzhuo Yuan1,2, Lihong Dong1, Zhengming Jiao1*
1Department of Mathematics, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang, China
2Department of Mathematics, Nanyang Normal University, Nanyang, China
Email: *zmjiao@htu.cn
Received January 31, 2013; revised March 18, 2013; accepted April 27, 2013
Copyright © 2013 Yuzhuo Yuan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License,
which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
ABSTRACT
,,ACIn this paper the integrals of entwining structure
are discussed, where
A
is a k-algebra, a k-coalgebra
and
C
CA AC:
a k-linear map. We prove that there exists a normalized integral
:Hom,CCA
of
,,AC
if and only if any representation of
,,AC
is injective in a functorial way as a corepresentation of .
We give the dual results as well.
C
k
k
k
Keywords: Entwining Structure; Integral; Forgetful Functor; Natural Transformation
1. Introduction
The integrals for Hopf algebras were introduced by Larson
and Sweedler [1,2]. Integrals have proven to be essential
instruments in constructing invariants of surgically pre-
sented 3-manifolds or 3-dimensional topological quantum
field theories [3-5]. The aim of this paper is to show that
some results of recent paper [6] concerning integrals and
its properties for Doi-Koppinen structure hold for the
more general concept known as entwining structure [7,8].
It is a structure of an algebra, a coalgebra and a k-linear
map such that several compatibility conditions are satis-
fied. Unlike Doi-Koppinen structure, there is no need for
a background bialgebra, which is an indispensable part of
the Doi-Koppinen construction. The bialgebra-free formu-
lation also has a remarkable self-duality property, which
essentially implies that for every statement involving co-
algebra structure of an entwining structure there is a cor-
responding statement involving its algebra structure.
This paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we
recall definitions and give examples of entwining struc-
tures and entwined modules. In Section 3, we introduce
the integrals of entwining structure and analyse its pro-
perties generalizing the results of [6]. Finally, in Sec-
tion 4 we derive the dual form of the integrals of entwin-
ing structure and its properties.
2. Preliminaries
Throughout this paper, will be a field. Unless spe-
cified otherwise, all modules, algebras, coalgebras, bial-
gebras, tensor products and homomorphisms are over .
For a -algebra
A
, A (resp. A) will be the
category of right(resp. left)
 
A
-modules and
A
-linear
maps.
H
will be a Hopf algebra over k. We omit
Sweedler’s sigma-notion [9] extensively. For example, if
,C
is a coalgebra, then for all we write cC
cc c k
 
12
Definition 2.1 An entwining structure on consists
of a triple
.
,,AC , where
A
is a -algebra, a
-coalgebra and
k C
k:CA AC
 k, a -linear map
satisfying the relations
,abca bc


11,
AA
cc

 
12
,
C
acacc


 

CC
ca ca

,,abAc C
, where for all
.ca acac
  
Remark 2.2 Generally, we call the entwining structure
in Definition 2.1 a right-right entwining structure. Unless
specified otherwise, all the entwining structures men-
tioned in this paper are right-right entwining structures.

,,AC
,,AC
Definition 2.3 Let
and

:
be two
entwining structures,
f
AA
:
be an algebra map and
CC be a coalgebra map. We call
g
*Corresponding author.
C
opyright © 2013 SciRes. APM
Y. Z. YUAN ET AL.
382

,:,,fg AC

,,AC


.
is an entwining map if

f
ggf


Example 2.4 Let
H
be a bialgebra,
A
a right
H
-
comodule algebra, C a right
H
-module coalgebra.
Then Doi-Koppinen structure
,,
H
AC [10] is an ent-
wining structure. The entwining structure map is
01
.a ca:,ACcaCA

If
H
has a bijective antipode , the S
is bijective
with

11
10
:.a a
C
ac cS


Example 2.5 [3] Let be a coalgebra,
A
an alge-
bra and a right -comodule. Let
C
 
, ,
AA
AaAbab a


C
Bb
and assume that the canonical right A-module, right -
comodule map
:,
B
AAC aa
 
A
a a

CA AC
can A
is bijective. Let :
 k
 

11.
A
n ca
be a -linear map
given by

ca canca
,,AC
Then
is an entwining structure. The exten-
sion is called a coalgebra-Galois extension and
denoted by
BA

C
A
B.

,,AC
is the canonical entwin-
ing structure associated to

C
A
B

,,AC .
Lemma 2.6 Let
be a right-right entwin-
ing structure. where
is invertible, its inverse is
:
A
CCA
, then

,,AC
is a left-left ent-
wining structure. i.e.
,a bcabc
11,
AA
cc

 
12
,acc

 

,
CC
ca

.
c ac
 



C
ac

 

ca
c C
for all , where
,,ab A

caa

Definition 2.7 Let
,,AC
be an entwining struc-
ture. An
,,AC
-entwined module is a -module k
M
with a right
A
-action and a right -coaction such
that for all ,
C
mM,aA

01
.m m
Mma a
 
A module morphism of entwining structure
,,AC
is a right
A
-module map and a right -comodule map.
Generally, we denote the module category of
C
,,AC
C
by

A
. Modules associatedto the entwining
cture in
Actor
worgets the C-coactio
AAMC
stru Example 2.4 are Doi-Hopf module. But
entwined modules associated to the entwining structure
in Example 2.5 do not seem to be of Doi-Hopf type.
Let

:C
CA
F

be the forgetful fun
hich fn and

:,
C
CM
 
its right adjoint, where the structure maps on
M
C
are given by
,mcama c

 
12
,
MCmc mcc
 
for any ,,aAcCmM
. The unit of the adjoint pair
,
C
F
C is


:1 C
A
C
CF
 
the C-coaction :
M

M
MC, therefor
M
is A-
ear and can be view linear and C-colined as a natural trans-
formation between the functor

1C
A
and

C
CF
 .
A
C and
A
CC
A
is a right
A
-module, so
are od
entwining mule via:
bca,ba c


12
,
AC bc bcc
 
,bcdabac d
 

12
,
ACC bcd bcdd
  
for any , , , ab Acd C
.

:C
AA

be the other forgetful func-
to forgets the A-ac
A
Let C
G
r whichtion and

:,
C
C
A
N
NA
 
its left adjoint, where for

C
A
N
, NA via the
structures
01
,
NAna nan
 
,nabnab
for any ,, ab An N
. The unit anunit of the ad-
d co
, A
joint pair
A
G are


:1,
A
AA
:1,
CC
A
GGA
 

:, ,
MM

M
AA mama

 

:, 1.
NN
NNA nn

 
In particular,

,C
A
CACAA

3. The Integrals of the Entwining Structure
s
.
In this section, we first present a point of view which i
Copyright © 2013 SciRes. APM
Y. Z. YUAN ET AL. 383
essential for the rest of paper: the existence of an integral
on a Hopf algebra is a necessary and sufficient criterion
for constructing a natural transformation between two
functors.
Lemma 3.1 [6] Let
H
be a finite dimension Hopf
algebra over k,
H
is its dual. There exists a right
integral
H
o
n
H
such that ,1H
hh


for
all h

and ly if :H ifon
H
k
is right -
H
comap, where k has l right -
odule mthe trivia
H
co
s this result as follows.
-
moule structure.
Doi [11] generalize
Definition 3.2 Let
A
be a
H
-comodule algebra. A
map :
H
A
is called an integral if
is right
H
-linear.
is called a total integral if additionally
11
H
A
.
rion
T
he r the existence of a total integral is
gi
crite fo
ven by the theorem following.
Theorem 3.3 [11] Let
A
be a right
H
-comodule
alqugebra. The following are eivalent
1) There exists a total integral :
H
A
;
2) Any Hopf module
H
M is injective as right
H-comodule. i.e. the righton :
H-coacti
M
MH

splits in the category
H
;
3) :
A
A
AH
 splits in the category
H
.
eorem of Doi s. Thecan be restated as follow th
Theorem 3.4 [6] Let
A
be a right
H
-comodule
algebra. The following are equivalent
1) There exists a total integral :
H
A
rmation 2) There exists a natural transfo

:1
H
A
H
AA
FHFF 
that splits

:1
H
A
H
AA
F
FHF
:

;
3) A
A
AH
 splits in the category
H
.
rk 3.5 1) Tstilllid
le
Rem he above theorem is vaa
aving aside the normalizing condition
11
H
A
.
More exactly, there exists an integral :
H
A
d
only if there exists

:
if an
1
H
A
H
A
FHF

. In
particular, if
A
F
A
k,ight
integral :
we obtain that there exists a r
H
k
on
H
if and only if there exists a
natural tron
.
ansformati
:1
H
H
HF
 
Further-
more,

11
H
k
if and only if
splits
:1 H

H
H
F
forgetful functo
. This is equivalent tohe fact
:
HH k
F is separable.
2) Let
t
that the r
A
be a right
H
-comodule
ve
algebra. The
rsion of Theorem 3.4 fore category th
H
A
is still
true. In this case the H-colinear split of
:
M
M
MH
 associated to a right total integral
:
H
A
is given by the formula
:,
M
M
HM




01
.Smh
We will now give the definition of integral of entwine-
in
Mmh m


g structure arising from Theorem 2.4 and the definition
of integral of Doi-Koppinen structure in [6].
Definition 3.6 Let
,,AC
be an entwining struc-
tu :HC
re. A k-linear map

om,CA is called an
integral of
,,AC
if







12 21
,cdcddc
for all ,cdC


. An integral
:Hom,CCA
is
rmalized

called no if for all cC
1.cc c



21 A
Remark 3.7 If Doi-Koppinen structure

,,
H
AC in
Example 2.4 takes place of the entwining structure in the
above definition and obviously entwining structure map
is
01
:, .CA ACcaaca
 
Definition 3.6 is just the definition of integral of Doi-
K
e that the existence of an integral
oppinen structure.
We shall now prov
:Hom,CCA permits the deformation of k-
n two entwined modules until it
becomes a C-colinear map.
Propositi 3.8 Let
linear map betwee
on
,,CA
be an entwining
st C
A an
. Suppose that there exi
ructure.

,
C
MN
d :uNM a k-
linear mapsts
:Hom,CCA
. Then
1) For all nN
,

the map
 
010
01
unn un



 is right
C-colinear;
:,N Muun
2) If
Hom ,CCA is a normalized integral
an
:
d :
f
Mism in

C
N is a morphA
which is a
k-splresp. a k-split surjehen it injection (ction), t
f
has
a C-colinear retraction(esp. a section).
oof. 1) For nNr
Pr
, we have
 
 










010
01
010 0
01211
011012
01
0001 001
01
01
.
M
M
N
un n un
unnunun
unnunn
unn unn
unnuidn
un


















2) Let :uN M be a k-linear retraction(resp.
se
f
ction) of . Then
spn) of
:uN M
is a right C-colinear
retraction(re. a sectio
f
. Then, for mM
Copyright © 2013 SciRes. APM
Y. Z. YUAN ET AL.
384













01
1
0
021,
0
01
00
1
ufm fm ufm
ufmm ufm
mmm m

hence is a right Cof
uf m
u
-colinear retraction
f
.
of On the other handf :uN M is a section
, i
f
,
then for nN

 


 


01
01
021.
fu
0
01
0
01
fu
nn un
funn fun
nnn n







i.e. is a right C-colinear section of
n
u
f
.
le
Dinition 3.9 [11] A right C-comodu ef
M
is
inj
called
ective, if for any k-split onomorhism:iUV
in C
and for any C-colinear map :
m
f
UM,
there exists C-colinear map :
g
VM sut ch tha
g
if.
1] A right CLemma 3.10 [1-comodule
M
is in-
jective, if :
M
M
MC
 splits in C
, . there
exists a C-colin :
M
i.e
ear map
M
CM
 such that
M
MM
di

.
We will prove now the 3.4 for version of Theorem
entwining modules which have inverse entwining struc-
ture map. Parts of the following theorem are closely
related to the ideas presented in [6].
Theorem 3.11 Let

,,AC
be an entwining struc-
ture, where
is invits inverse is ertible,
. The
following stateents are equivalent:
1) There exists a normalized integral
m

:Hom,CCA;
nsf 2) The natural traormation


:1
C
A
C
AA
F
FCF

3) The right C-co
splits;
n on actio
A
C,
:
r
AC
A
CACC
 spl
onsef the equivalent co
C
its in .
,nditions
ho
CC
quently if one o
lds, any entwined module is injective as a right C-
comodule.
Proof.
 
12 Let
:Hom,CCA
be a no
malized integral.
r-
construct a naW toe havetural trans-
formation
that splits
. Let

C
A
M
and
:
M
uMCM ,

M
umc c
 inear
retraction of
m be the k-l
:
M
M
MC


cm
, for all c
given by

M
umc ,CmM. We define
M
M
u
, i.e. for all

, cC
m
M
M
,
:,CM
 
M
M
 


01
Mmc mcm


It follows from Proposition 3.8 that the map
.
M
is a
right C-colinear retraction of
M
.
It remains to prove that


is a naturrans-
formation. Let :
al t
f
MN beo a mrC
phism in

A
.
We have to prove that

.
MN C
f
fid

Since
f
A
is right -linear, we have






01
01
,
fm cm
fm cm
M
fmc



  




01
01
.
NC
N
f
idm c
cfm
fmcfm
fm cm


i.e.
is a natural transformation that splits
.
23

C
A
Assume that for any M
C-caction splits in C
. In particular,
, the
o
r:
AC
A
CACC
 splits in
:
AC
C. Let
A
CC CA
 be a right C-colinear
retraction of r
AC
. Using the naturality of AC
, we
will prove that AC
is also left C-coliner, where a
A
C
and
A
CC
are left C-comodules via:

 
12
.
l
ac c
acd cacd

 
12
,
la c

  
Let V be a k-module and

C
A
M
. Then
C
VM

A
 he structures a the
es of
via trising from
on
M
as follows
, .m vmaid
VMV M
v
 
Using the naturality of
, we shall prove that
.
VMV M
id
Let vV
and :, .
VV
g
MVMgmvm From
the naturality of
we obtain that
.
C
VM VMV
g
g

id
Hence
 


.
VM
VM M
VM
vmc
g
mcvmc
idv m c


 
 
In particular, let ,
M
ACVC, then
Copyright © 2013 SciRes. APM
Y. Z. YUAN ET AL. 385
AC
C
A
C
es arisin via the structurg from the
ones of
A
C, i.e. fo

c
,cba d
r all , , , abAcd C,
bda
 

12
.bd 
thes
,
 

CA
Ccbd
  
e structures the map
AC
rc
d
With
:
l
f
ACC
AC
 
12


f
ac c

rphism in

C
A
a c

is a mo
. From the naturality of
,
the following diagramutative. m is com
A
CC AC
A
C
l
AC C
id
l
AC
CACC CAC
id
CAC
i.e. AC
is also left C-colinear.
-c
:
r
AC
3he right Coaction
1 T
A
CAC is a C-bicoCmodule map. Let
AC
:
A
CC AC
 be a split of r
AC
in
,,AcC
CC
. In particular, for all a
ac


, cd C, define
 
12 .c c

m,,CA
 
1.
AA
c
a
For all
We will
:HoC
 
cd id


prove that
d
is a normalized integral.
-odule Because the right Ccoaction r
AC
is a C-bim
ma
on the othe
p, on the one hand

 


12
1
AA
AC
cdc
id d
id id



1
rdc






12
C
c c
id


1
ACA
d c



12
1.
d
dc

We adopt the temporary notion
1,
Aii
i
dca c AC
 
then
 
2
1
,
l
AC ACCA
lii
dc
accac







1;
ACC A
r
AC
A
id id
dc




r hand,


cd
 







21
12
AA
dc
d
did




1
AC i ii
ii




 



12
12
1
1
1,
l
CACACCA
CAC A
A
id
iddd c
ddc



 
 
For AC
d c
is left C-colinear,

 
1212
1.
Ai
ii
i
ddccac
 

Hence



12
1,
ii
i
diddc ca
AA
 

i.e.


1.
AA ii
i
diddc ac

12


We have proved that is a normalized integral of
,,AC
at last.
ving aside the normalizing condition, we obtain the
ing corollary.
Corollary 3.12 Let
Lea
follow
,,AC
be an entwining
structure, where
is invertible. The following state-
m
1) The integral
ents are equivalent
re exists an
:Hom,CCA
of
,,AC
;
2) There exists


:1
C
A
C
AA
FCFF
   a
na
tural transformation;
3) There exists:
A
CC AC
 a C-bico-
module map.
If the entwining structure map ect is invertible, the obj
take an important role in

C
A
A
C
. We shall
prplication of the existence of a
is paper.
Let
ove the main ap
normalized integral in th
,,ACTheorem 3.13
be an
entwining
structure, where is invertible, its inverse is
.
Suppose there exists a normalized integral of
,,AC
Hom,CA, for any C
M:C

A
the map
:,
,
f
MACM




01
f
macmam c
 
is a k-split epimorphism in

C
A
. In p, articular
A
is a generatotegory
r in the ca
C
A
C
Proof.
.
M
AC
as an

C
A
is viewed object in
, with the structures arising from the ones of
, i.e.
A
C
Copyright © 2013 SciRes. APM
Y. Z. YUAN ET AL.
386

mbca ,mba c


1
c
 

 
2
.mbc mbc
 
b
fo ,AcCm
r all ,,a M
. First we shall prove that
f
is a k-split surjection. Let
01
, 1,
A
:
g
MMACgmm m 
r all . Thenfo mM
g
is right C-colinear. For
mM, weve ha





mm m
01
00
1Am
m
1 01
021
01 ,
fgm fm
m
m
mmm

i.e.
g
is a right c-colinear section of
f
. For
,c Cm M , weve ,,ab A ha






01
fmbca

01
,
f
mba cmc
mcmbafm

mba
bca

 


i.e.
f
is right
A
-r linear. It remains to ove thatp
f
is
ght C-colinearalso ri. In fact,

 









101
,
12
12
2
CMAC
C
f
idm b c
f
idmb cc
fm b cc


 


mcmbc



























01
00 1
02
02
01
1
01
01
(
()
M
Mmc
m
mcm
mcmb
mcm
mc mb
mcmb
mcmb

01
1
1
2
12
12
,
fm b c
b
bm
m
bm
c
c
c




i.e.









f
is right C-colinear.
Hence,
f
is an epimorphism in

C
A
and has a
rig C-colinear section.
Taking a k-free presentation of
ht
M
in the category
of k-modules

0,
I
kM

we obtain an epimorphism in

C
A


0
IIg
ACk ACM

where
AC
A
fII
. Hence
g
C is a gene-
rator in

C
A
.
Remark 3.14 An important application of integrals in
finite dimension Hopf algebra is Maschke theorem. It
finds the condition of finite dimension Hopf algebras to
be semisimple. [12-14] have studied the relation between
the integral of Doi-Koppinen structure and Maschke
theorem. The integrals of entwining structure we study
alwith Maschke theorem, the
rer.
4. n
e has the property of self-
duality, we will get some dual results of Section 3. In
nition of integrals of the
tly, we have the lemma as
follows
Let
here so have a tend relation
aders can efer to the reference [3,15]
The Coitegrals of Entwining Structure
Because the entwining structur
order to give the dual defi
entwining structure convenien
,,ACLemma 4.1
be an ent
The fol:
1) The a nor
wining structure.
lowing are equivalent
re existsmalized integral
:Hom,CCA;
2) There exists a k-linear map :CCA
 such
that for all ,.cd C

 


12 21
,cddc dc




12 1.
A
cc c

Proof. Let
dc cd


. The proof of the
lemma is obvious.
Definition 4.2 Let
,,AC
be an entwining
structure. A k-linear map :CAA
 is called an
cointegral of
,,AC
if for any

12
,cCccc AA
 
,
caa
 
1212
.cc c

 

A cointegral
is called normalized if

12 1.
A
c c

have the dualProposition 3.8,
.11 and Them 3.13.
Proposition 4.3 Let
c
We shall results of
Theorem 3eor
,,AC
be a entwing struc-
ture.

,
C
A
M
A
Nin
, :uN M a k-linear
map. Suppose that there exists :CAA, then:
Copyright © 2013 SciRes. APM
Y. Z. YUAN ET AL. 387
1) For all nN, the map

11
:uN n

is
12
0
, Mu unn
right
A
-linear;
2) Let :CAA
 is lized cointegral and
:
a norma
f
MN phism in is a m

C
or A
which is a
k-split injection (resp. a k-split surection), then j
f
has a
A
-linear retraction. a section).
Proof. It is just the dual of Proposition 3.8.
Let
(resp
Theorem 4.4
,,AC
be an entwinitruc-
ture, where
ng s
is invertible, its inverse is
. The
fo e
1) There exists a normalized cointegral
:CAA
llowing statemnts are equivalent:
;
splits;
2) The natural transformation


:1
C
CC
A
GAGG
  
A
3) The right
A
-action on CA,
in AA
.
le equivalent ns
hontwine is projective as a right
C-comodule.
:CAA
:
r
CACAA CA
 splits
nconditioConseque one of th
lds, any eed modul
ty, if
Proof.
 
12 Let
 be a norma-
in to construct a natural trans- lized cotegral. We have
formation
that splits
. Let

C
A
M
and for
, , :1
any
,
M
MA
cCu MMm  
the k-linear section of :
M
m AuMm
be
M
AM
 . We d -
fine
e
M
M
u
, i.e.

:,
MM
M
MA



 
12
01 1
Mmm mm


w
ma
here mM. It follows from Proposition 4.3 that the
p
M
is a rht ig
A
-linear section of
M
. It remains
to prove that

is a natural transformation.
Let :
f
MN be a

C
A
morphism in
. We
at
.
have to prove th
MN
A
f
id f


For any mM, using that
f
is right C-colinear,
we have


 




 
1
12
1
12
1 1
,
A
fid
m
fm m

12
01
01
0
M
A
m
fidmmm
fm m
m






 



 
12
01 1
,fm m m


i.e.
12
01 1
Nfm
fm fmfm


is a nasformation that splits tural tran
.
3 Assu

C
A
2me that for any M
right ,
A
-action splits in A. In particular,
:
CACAA CA
  splits in . Let
:CA CAAA
A
 be a right
CA
-linear
se CA
ction of
. Using the naturality of CA
, we will
prove that-linear, where CA
A
CA
is also left
and CAA
A
are left -modules via:
,ac bcab
 
,acbb c abb

where , , , .abbAc C
First let V be a k-module and

C
A
M
. Then

C
A
VM
, via the structures arising from the
ones of , i.e.
M
, .
VMV M
vmavma id
 
Using the naturality of
, we prove that
.id
VMV M
vV
Let
and
:,
vv
.
g
MVMg From
e naturality of
m m
th
v
we obtain that
.
VA M
gid
VM V
g

Hence



VM m



VM VVA M
MVM
v
.
g
mgid

m
vmidm


  
In particular, let ,
M
CAVA
, then

C
A
A
AC
 a the st viructures arising from the
ones of
,bcbabcba
  
 
12
r
AC Abcbbcb c
 
 
fo
.
r all , , , abbAc C
. ith these structureWs the map
:,
l
CA
f
AC AA
 C
c bca
a b
 
is a morphism in

C
A
. From the naturality of
,
the following diagram is commutative.
CA
CAA
AC
l
CA
A
CAACA
id
A
CAA
l
CA A
id
Copyright © 2013 SciRes. APM
Y. Z. YUAN ET AL.
388
i.e.
 
1212
.ccaacc

 

Then we obtained that
A
CA
is also left -linear.

right
31
: The
A
-action
A A is a
is a normalized cointegral
of
:
r
CA
CAC
A
-bimodule m p. Let a
,,AC
:
CCA
ACAA
  be a split of CA
 r
in
. all ,,aAcC
AA
In particular, for

c
aca.
, we define
 
1.
AA A
c
t
id m
finally.
Leaving aside the normalizing condition, we obtain the
following corollary
Corollary 4.5 Let
,,AC
be an entwining struc-
ture, where
For all cC
 
:, CAAcidi

 d
We will prove tha
is
 

1
11.
AA A
AA
c
c

,,cCaA on the one hand


A
j
ca
jjj
c a b







on the other hand,

1
1
A
A A
a
c a


we haveed
a normalized cointegral.
 
12
ccmidid


is invertible. The following statements
are equivalent:
1) There exists a cointegral :CAA
;
2) There exists


:1
C
A
CC
A
GGAG

a
natural transformation;
3) There exists :CACAA

 
id idmc
 
For any
 


 

12
AA
AA A
AA
A
acc
mid idca
mid ididid
id
m



 
 

 

1
ca
1,
A
AA
id aididc
 
j j
j
b
, then
12

Let

1A
c


acc


;
AAA
j
j
mi
d aidid
 

jj
j
ca
a b

 

 










12
1
AA
AAAA
AAAA
AA
AA
AA A
AA jjj
j
AA jjj
j
j
cca
idc a
idmididid c
id idid idmid
ididc a
id idca
idid ac
ididac a b
ididcaab
ca
 




 
 
  
 
 
 


 






 


jj
j
j
ab


id m

,
jj
j
ca
a b
us
is a
A
-bimodule map. Hence
A
 an
-bi-
module map.
Theorem 4.6 Let
,,AC
be an entwining struc-
ture, where is invertible, its inverse is
. Suppose
there exists a normalized cointegral of
,,AC
:CAA, for any

C
A
M
, the map
:,
f
MMCA


12
m
01 21
.fm mmm


for all ,,aAcCmM
 is a k-split monom
in

Corphism
A
. In particular, CA is a cogenerator in
the category

C
A
.
Proof. just the dual It is of Theorem 3.13.
ents
EFERENCES
. E. Sweedler, “An Asve
form for Hopf Algebra
, Vol. 91, No. 1
0
5. Acknowledgem
This work was partially supported by the Natural Science
Foundation of Henan Province (102300410049).
R
[1] M R. G. Larson andsociati Or-
thogonal Bilinears,” American
Journal of Mathematics, 1969, pp. 75-94.
doi:10.2307/237327
1969, pp
323-335. doi:10.2307/1970672
[2] M. E. Sweedler, “Integrals for Hopf Algebra,” Annals of
Mathematics Second Series, Vol. 89, No. 2, .
[3] T. Kerler, “Bridged Links and Tang Presentations of
Cobordism Categories,” Advances inthematics, Vol.
141, No. 2, 1999, pp. 207-281.
doi:10.1006/aima.1998.1772
le
Ma
Kuperberg, “Non-Involuntory
Manifo e Mat
96, pp. 83-129.
[4] G. Hopf Algebras and 3-
ld Invariants,” Dukhematical Journal, Vol.
84, No. 1, 19
doi:10.1215/S0012-7094-96-08403-3
V. Turaev, “Quantum Invariants of Knots and 3-Mani-[5]
erlin, 1994.
ru, “Integral, Quantum Galois
ol. 247,
folds,” Walter de Gruyter, B
[6] C. Menini and G. Mimita
Extensions and the Affineness Criterion for Quantum
Yetter-Drinfeld Modules,” Journal of Algebra, V
No. 2, 2002, pp. 467-508. doi:10.1006/jabr.2001.8899
[7] T. Brezinski and S. Majid, “Coalgebra Bundles,” Commu-
Copyright © 2013 SciRes. APM
Y. Z. YUAN ET AL.
Copyright © 2013 SciRes. APM
389
nications in Ml. 191, No. 2, 1998athematical Physics, Vo,
pp. 467-492. doi:10.1007/s002200050274
[8] T. Brezinski, “On Modules Associated to Coalgebra Ga-
lois Extensions,” Journal of Algebra, Vol. 215, No. 1,
1999, pp. 290-317. doi:10.1006/jabr.1998.7738
[9] M. E. Sweedler, “Hopf Algebras,” Benjamin, New York,
1969.
[10] Y. Doi, “Unifying Hopf Modules,” Journal of Algebra,
Vol. 153, No. 2, 1992, pp. 373-385.
doi:10.1016/0021-8693(92)90160-N
[11] Y. Doi, “Algebras with Total Inte
in Algebra, Vol. 13, No. 10, 1
grals,” Communications
985, pp. 2137-2159.
ican Mathematical Society
[12] S. Caenepeel, G. Militaru and S. Zhu, “Doi-Hopf Modules,
Yetter-Drinfel’d Modules and Frobenius Type Proper-
ties,” Transactions of the Amer,
Vol. 349, No. 11, 1997, pp. 4311-4342.
doi:10.1090/S0002-9947-97-02004-7
[13] S. Caenepeel, G. Militaru and S. Zhu, “A Maschke Type
Theorem for Doi-Hopf Modules and Applications,” Jour-
nal of Algebra, Vol. 187, No. 2, 1997, pp. 388-412.
doi:10.1006/jabr.1996.6794
[14] S. Caenepeel, G. Militaru and S. Zhu, “Separable Func-
tors for the Category of Doi-Hopf Modules, Applica-
tions,” Advances in Mathematics, Vol. 145, No. 2, 1999,
pp. 239-290. doi:10.1006/aima.1998.1817
[15] T. Brzeziński, S. Caenepeel, G. Militaru and S. Zhu, “Fro-
benius and Maschke Type Theorems for Doi-Hopf Mod-
ules and Entwined Modules Revisited: A Unified Ap-
proach,” In: A. Granja, J. Alonso Hermida and A. Verscho-
ren, Eds., Marcel Dekker, New York, 2001.