E. NIKOLAEVA, V. MERENKOVA
The gender breakdown of the sample groups did not differ from
each other and conformed to the known statistics, which show a
slight predominance among newborn males (Golubeva, Les-
henko, & Pechora, 2002).
The study was conducted in a children’s clinic in one of the
districts of Yeletz, a city in west-central Russia.
The following two sets of procedures were used to carry out
the aim of the study. The first set of procedures involved de-
scribing the distinct features concerning the health of the chil-
dren in their first or second year of life. A comprehensive ap-
praisal of the children’s health was conducted based on health
criteria (Golubeva, Leshenko, & Pechora, 2002), information
about which was received from the individual medical records
of the children, aged up to two years. Permission to use this in-
formation was obtained from the children’s parents.
The second set of procedures was aimed at examining the
psychological features of the mothers with children up to two
years old and included the following procedures:
1) A questionnaire evaluating the attitude of a mother toward
a child during its first two years of life (Vereshagina & Niko-
laeva, 2009). The questionnaire included four scales:
a) Sensitivity—insensitivity to the needs of the baby. This
parameter establishes the extent to which the mother is capable
of understanding the child’s needs and seeing a situation from
its point of view.
b) Acceptance—rejection. This scale determines the degree
to which the parents accept the child, i.e., it evaluates how
much the child corresponds to their expectations.
c) Responsiveness—intrusion. This parameter establishes the
mother’s respect for the independence and individuality of the
child and shows how prepared she is to support its initiative,
develop its abilities and, not suppressing them, press for the re-
alization of its own wishes.
d) Encouragement—neglect. This scale establishes that as-
pect of the mother’s behavior which reveals the degree of her
emotional fitness. This parameter evaluates her ability to sup-
port the tot when it is experiencing difficulties.
Such is a qualitative description of a mother’s level of at-
tachment to her child. A high level of healthy attachment cor-
responds to high scores that the mother’s answers receive ac-
cording to all four scales. This means that she is extremely
sensitive to the needs of her child, accepts it as it is and does
not try to follow the socially accepted notions of child devel-
opment. She always responds promptly to the child’s appeals,
providing support for its undertakings and granting sufficient
freedom for its own actions.
A mean level of healthy attachment is assigned when either
mean scores are given for all scales or very high scores for the
majority of scales are combined with low marks for one of
them. In this case, we did not take into account the contribution
of each scale to the final result since we had set ourselves the
task of evaluating the types of interaction in the mother-child
pair. Accordingly, with a mean level of healthy attachment, a
mother shows sensitivity to her child’s needs in most cases and
tries to develop socially desirable forms of behavior beginning
in early childhood. Depending on the situation, she responds to
the child’s appeals and provides support for its initiatives but
often excessively controls its behavior or, being extremely busy,
fails to respond in certain instances to the child’s appeals for
help.
A low level of healthy attachment corresponds to low scores
on all scales or average scores on two and very low marks on
some of the other scales. In practice, the mother shows interest
in the child in socially acceptable situations, and when wit-
nesses are present, and tends to impose her own stereotypes of
behavior on the child regardless of its needs. In most cases, she
ignores the child’s interests and rejects its requests for support
or independent investigation.
Unhealthy attachment is characterized by a mother pursuing
her own line of behavior in interaction without considering the
wishes of her child and the particularities of its development,
essentially impeding the independence and initiative of the
child and not striving to support it in difficult situations (re-
strictiveness or neglect prevail). Thus, it is obvious that we can
separate out anxious unhealthy attachment from the responses,
but no mother would write about the ambivalence of her be-
havior in relation to her child. For the time being, it is possible
that this type of interaction falls into the category of healthy
attachment since many mothers, in their responses, are guided
not by their own behavior but by what they consider to be the
societal standards.
2) The questionnaire to evaluate emotional intelligence (Ly-
usin, 2004) is a standardized methodology for measuring the
level of emotional intelligence. The questionnaire is based on
an interpretation of emotional intelligence as the ability to un-
derstand one’s own and others’ emotions and to control them.
In its final form, the questionnaire consists of 46 statements in
relation to which the test subject must express the extent of their
agreement, using a four-point scale (strongly disagree, tend to
disagree, tend to agree, strongly agree). These statements are
combined into five sub-scales, which, in turn, are combined
into four scales of a more general nature.
The questionnaire included the following scales:
a) A scale of interpersonal emotional intelligence, which is
aimed at evaluating the ability to understand the emotions of
other people and to control them.
b) A scale of intrapersonal emotional intelligence, which de-
scribes the ability to understand one’s own emotions and to
control them.
c) A scale of emotional understanding, which delineates the
ability to understand one’s own and others’ emotions.
d) A scale of emotional control, which defines the ability to
control one’s own and others’ emotions.
A sub-scale of understanding others’ emotions, which de-
scribes the ability to understand a person’s emotional state ba-
sed on external manifestations of emotions (facial expressions,
gestures, tone of voice) and/or one’s own intuition; sensitivity
to the inner state of other people.
A sub-scale of controlling others’ emotions, which delineates
the ability to evoke various emotions in other people, to reduce
the intensity of undesirable emotions and, possibly, the inclina-
tion to manipulate people.
A sub-scale of understanding one’s own emotions, which de-
fines the ability to perceive one’s emotions, to recognize and
identify them, to understand their source and to verbalize them.
A sub-scale of controlling one’s own emotions, which de-
scribes the ability and need to control one’s emotions, to evoke
and encourage desirable emotions and to keep those that are un-
desirable under control.
A sub-scale of controlling expression, which describes the
ability to control the display of one’s emotions.
3) A Russian version of the Spielberger questionnaire, ad-
apted for Russian-speaking test subjects by Khanin (Shapar,
2006). This allowed us to determine the level of situational and
Copyright © 2013 SciRes.
484