D.-Y. CHUNG, R. HEFFERLIN 25
lar boson came from the scalar hidden lepton conden-
sate. Consequently, the remnant of the Higgs boson as
the Standard Model Higgs boson adopted the existence
of the hidden lepton condensate, and became the Avatar
Higgs boson.
The two possibilities for the Standard Model Higgs
boson that adopts the hidden lepton condensate are the
pure Standard Model Higgs boson and the dual particle
consisting of the Standard Model Higgs boson and the
non-Standard Model hidden lepton condensate. The de-
cay of the pure Standard Model Higgs boson follows the
decay modes of the Standard Model.
vidence for th
ce
Being outside of the Standard Model of the elec-
troweak interaction, the hidden lepton condensate cannot
decay into the particles in the electroweak interaction,
and decay into diphoton via the internal annihilation of-
particle-antiparticle. As a result, the decay of the dual
particle generates excess diphoton deviated from the
Standard Model. The experimental ee ex-
ss diphoton is inconclusive [18-20].
4. Summary
It is proposed that all elementary particles including lep-
tons, quarks, and gauge bosons can be placed in the pe-
riodic system of elementary particles. The periodicity is
derived from the two sets of seven mass orbitals where
seven comes from the seven extra dimensions in the
al membrane in the string theory. The
uent masses are in good agreement with
gi
of
ensate as a composite of
eleven-dimension
calculated constit
the observed values by using only four known constants:
the number of the extra spatial dimensions in the
eleven-dimensional membrane, the mass of electron, the
mass of Z boson, and the fine structure constant.
It is proposed that the Higgs boson itself is a virtual
zero-energy gauge boson by borrowing energy from and
returning energy to the particles in the electroweak in-
teraction. When a massless particle in the electroweak
interaction absorbs the Higgs boson, the Higgs boson
becomes the longitudinal component of the massless par-
ticle, resulting in the massive particle. At the benning
the universe, all particles in the electroweak interac-
tion were massless. The symmetrical borrowing of en-
ergy from the particles and the asymmetrical returning of
energy by the absorption of the Higgs boson resulted in
the asymmetrical breaking of electroweak interaction and
the remnant of the Higgs boson from the absence of the
absorption of the Higgs boson by photon. The remnant of
the Higgs boson adopted the existence of the scalar hid-
den lepton condensate and returned the borrowed energy
to photon.
The observed Higgs Boson at the LHC is the Standard
Model Higgs boson that adopts the existence of the hid-
den lepton condensate. The hidden lepton is in the for-
bidden lepton family, outside of the three lepton fami-
lies of the Standard Model. Being forbidden, a single
hidden lepton cannot exist alone; so it must exist in the
lepton cond
and
hid-
de
lar Taxonomy: String, Quark, Had-
ron, Nuclear, Atomic and Chemical Molecule Periodic or
Invariant Systemic Publish-
ing, Section 7, 2
/papers/0111/0111147.pdf
ger, et al., (Particle Data Group), “Electroweak
-rev-top-quark.pd
, No. 11, 1989, pp. 1043-
n leptons and their corresponding antileptons. The
calculated average mass of the hidden lepton condensate
is 128.8 GeV in good agreements with the observed 125
or 126 GeV.
REFERENCES
[1] R. Hefferlin, “Molecular Taxonomy: String, Quark, Had-
ron, Nuclear, Atomic and Chemical Molecule Periodic or
Invariant Systems,” LAP LAMBERT Academic Publish-
ing, Saarbrücken, 2011.
[2] R. Hefferlin, “Molecu
ems,” LAP LAMBERT Acad
011. pp. 35-38
[3] D. Chung, “The Periodic System of Elementary Particles
and the Composition of Hadrons,” Speculations in Sci-
ence and Technology, Vol. 20, 1997, pp. 259-268
http://arxiv.org/ftp/hep-th
[4] The ATLAS Collaboration, “Observation of a New Parti-
cle in the Search for the Standard Model Higgs Boson
with the ATLAS Detector at the LHC,” 2012.
arXiv:1207.7235v1[hep-ex]
[5] The CMS Collaboration, “Observation of a New Boson at
a Mass of 125 GeV with the CMS Experiment at the
LHC,” 2012. arXiv:1207.7235v1[hep-ex]
[6] D. Chung and V. Krasnoholovets, “The Cosmic Organ-
ism Theory,” Scientific Inquiry, Vol. 8, 2007, pp. 165-182.
http://www.iigss.net/Scientific-Inquiry/Dec07/3-krasnoho
lovets.pdf
[7] A. Salam, “Weak and Electromagnetic Interactions,” In:
W. Svartholm, Ed., Elementary Particle Theory, Alm-
quist and Wiksell, Stockholm, 1968, pp. 367-387.
[8] J. Beringe, et al., (Particle Data Group), “Electroweak
Model and Constraints on New Physics,” Physical Re-
view D, Vol. 86, 2012, Article ID: 010001.
http://pdg.lbl.gov/2012/reviews/rpp2012-rev-standard-mo
del.pdf
[9] D. Griffiths, “Introduction to Elementary Particles,”
WILEY-VCH, Hoboken, 2008, p. 135
[10] M. H. MacGregor, “Electron Generation of Leptons and
Hadrons with Conjugate α-Quantized Lifetimes and
Masses,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, Vol.
20, No. 4, 2005, pp. 719-798.
[11] J. Berin
Model and Constraints on New Physics,” Physical Re-
view D, Vol. 86, 2012, Article ID: 010001.
http://pdg.lbl.gov/2012/reviews/rpp2012
f
[12] V. A. Miransky, M. Tanabashi and K. Yamawaki, “Is the
t Quark Responsible for the Mass of W and Z Bosons,”
Modern Physics Letter A, Vol. 4
1063. doi:10.1142/S0217732389001210
Copyright © 2013 SciRes. JMP