Applied Mathematics
Vol.05 No.19(2014), Article ID:51203,6 pages
10.4236/am.2014.519279
Amenability and the Extension Property
Antoine Derighetti
EPFL SB-DO, MA A1 354, Station 8, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
Email: antoine.derighetti@epfl.ch
Copyright © 2014 by author and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Received 4 September 2014; revised 26 September 2014; accepted 6 October 2014
ABSTRACT
Let G be a locally compact group, H a closed amenable subgroup and u an element of the Herz Figà-Talamanca algebra of H with compact support, we prove the existence of an extension of u to G, with a good control of the norm and of the support of the extension.
Keywords:
Convolution Operators, Locally Compact Groups, Abstract Harmonic Analysis, Amenable Groups
1. Introduction
Let G be a locally compact group and H a closed subgroup, this paper is concerned with the problem of extending coefficients of the regular representation of H to G. Suppose H normal in G. In 1973 [1] C. Herz proved that for
with compact support, for every
and for every U neighborhood of
in G there is
with
,
and
. In this work we want to treat the case of non normal subgroups. We succeed assuming that the subgroup H is amenable (Theorem 5). C. Fiorillo obtained [2] already this result assuming however the unimodularity of G and of H. But the AN part of the Iwasawa decomposition of
was out of reach. Even for G amenable our result is new: the case of the non-normal copy of
in the
-group was also out of reach.
Without control of norm and support of the extension, the theorem has been obtained in 1972 by McMullen [3] . With control of the norm, but not considering the supports, the statement is due Herz [1] (see also [4] ).
2. A Property of Amenable Subgroups
We denote by
the set of all complex valued continuous functions on G with compact support. We choose a positive continuous function q on G such that
, left invariant measures on G and H and a measure
on
as in Chapter 8 of [5] . The following Lemma will be used in the proof of our main result. See below the steps
and
of the proof of Lemma 2.
Lemma 1 Let
be a locally compact group,
a closed amenable subgroup,
a compact subset of
,
a neighborhood of
in
and
. Then there is
such that
,
and
Proof. Let
be a compact neighborhood of
in
with
,
and
By the Proposition 2.1 of [6] (p. 463), there is
such that
,
and such that
for every
. For every
we have
where
Consequently
3. Approximation Theorem for Convolution Operators Supported by Subgroups
We refer to [7] for
and the canonical map
of
into
(Section
p. 101). We denote by
the Banach space of all bounded operators of
.
We define a family of linear maps
of
into
where
is an arbitrary closed
subgroup of. We precise that
is the involution of
and that for
,
and
we have
.
Definition 1. Let
be a locally compact group,
an arbitrary closed subgroup,
and
. For
we set for
.
Then
and
where
. If
then
and
is contained in
[8] .
Lemma 2. Let
be a locally compact group,
a closed amenable subgroup,
,
,
and
an open neighborhood of
in
. Then there is
with
,
,
and such that
for every
and every
.
Proof. Let
with
for every
. There is
a compact
symmetric neighborhood of
in
with
and such that
for every
. There is
open neighborhood of
in
such that
and
are both smaller than
for every
and for every
. We can choose
with
,
for every
and such that
.
Let
be a symmetric compact neighborhood of
in
contained in
with
for every
and such that
for every
and for every
(for
and
we denote by
the function defined on
by
).
We put,
and
where
is the canonical map of
onto
.
By the preceding Lemma there is
with
and such that
is smaller than
and also smaller than
for every. We finally put
,
and
.
1) For every
and every
we have
.
We show at first that
From
we obtain indeed
.
For every
we have
.
We have
.
But for every
and therefore
consequently
For every
we have
As above
taking in account that
we obtain
.
Proof of
Using
and
one obtains an estimate for
. We finish then the proof of 1) using
.
2) For every
and every
we have
By the Corollary 6 of section 7.2 p.112 of [7]
Consequently
But by definition of
for every
we have
3) End of the proof of Lemma 2. We are now able to define the functions
and
of the Lemma
and
. Using
and
we get
Clearly
and
. It remains to show that
. We have
But for
hence
and similarly
, we finally get
.
Theorem 3 Let
be a locally compact group,
a closed amenable subgroup,
,
a sequence of
,
a sequence of
,
and
an open neighborhood of
in
. Suppose that
the series
converges. Then there is
with
,
,
and such that
for every
Proof. We choose
with
1) There is
with
,
and such that
for every.
There are
and
sequences of
with
and
for every. From the convergence of
follows the existence of
such that
By Lemma 2 there is
with
,
,
and such that
for every
and every
. Consequently
2) End of the proof of Theorem 3. It suffices to put
and
to obtain
and
4. The Main Result
Definition 2 Let
be a locally compact group,
an arbitrary closed subgroup,
and
For
we put
where
and
are sequences of
such that
converges and such that
.
Then
is a linear map of
into
, for
and
one has
,
and
[8] .
Corollary 4 Let
be a locally compact group,
a closed amenable subgroup,
,
,
and
a neighborhood of
in
. Then there are
with
,
and
.
Proof. There are sequences
of
such that
converges and such that
. Let
be an open neighborhood of
in
such that
. By Theorem 3 there
is
with
,
,
and such that
for every.
Consider an arbitrary
with
. From
and
we get
and therefore
The following theorem is the main result of the paper.
Theorem 5 Let
be a locally compact group,
a closed amenable subgroup,
,
,
and
a neighborhood of
in
. Then there is
with
and
Proof. This proof is identical with the one of Proposition
ii) p. 115 of [1] . Let
be an open neighborhood of
in
such that the closure of
in
is compact and contained in
. Using the Corollary 4 we show by induction the existence of a sequence
of
and of a sequence
of
such that
,
,
,
,
and
The function
satisfies all the requirements.
Cite this paper
AntoineDerighetti, (2014) Amenability and the Extension Property. Applied Mathematics,05,2945-2951. doi: 10.4236/am.2014.519279
References
- 1. Herz, C.S. (1973) Harmonic Synthesis for Subgroups. Annales de l'institut Fourier, 23, 91-123.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5802/aif.473 - 2. Fiorillo, C. (2009) An Extension Property for the Figà-Talamanca Herz Algebra. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 137, 1001-1011.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9939-08-09679-2 - 3. McMullen, J.R. (1972) Extensions of Positive-Definite Functions. Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society, 117.
- 4. Delaporte, J. and Derighetti, A. (1992) On Herz’ Extension Theorem. Bollettino dell’Unime Matematica Italiana, (7) 6-A, 245-247.
- 5. Reiter, H. and Stegman, J.D. (2000) Classical Harmonic Analysis and Locally Compact Groups. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
- 6. Derighetti, A. (2004) On Herz’s Projection Theorem. Illinois Journal of Mathematics, 48, 463-476.
- 7. Derighetti, A. (2011) Convolution Operators on Groups. Lecture Notes of the Unione Matematica Italiana, 11, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg.
- 8. Delaporte, J. and Derighetti, A. (1995) p-Pseudomeasures and Closed Subgroups. Monatshefte für Mathematik, 119, 37-47.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01292767