Journal of Environmental Protection
Vol.09 No.08(2018), Article ID:86311,12 pages

Effects of PM2.5 and O3 on Human Health at a Suburban Area of Beijing, China

Siyuan (Larry) Chen1*, Michelle Dai2*, Fengli Lin3

1William G. Enloe High School, Raleigh, NC, USA

2North Carolina School of Science and Mathematics, Durham, NC, USA

3Maternal & Child Health Care Center, Yunhe District, Cangzhou City, China

Copyright © 2018 by author and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY 4.0).

Received: February 27, 2018; Accepted: July 27, 2018; Published: July 30, 2018


This work investigates the impact of air pollution on human health in China. First-hand data obtained at a suburban area of Beijing between January 2014 and June 2016 forms the basis for our study. It is hypothesized that there is a statistically significant relationship between lung cancer incidences and levels of air pollutants, in particular, PM2.5 and O3. Methods of analysis include correlation analysis, multiple regression, and trend analysis. Our results verify the hypothesis, and reveal that the high rates of lung cancer development in the studied period of 30 months can be interpreted by the high concentration of PM2.5 and O3 using the Poisson linear regression model. It is also discovered that PM2.5 and O3 have a strong negative correlation and they alternatingly serve as the primary contributor of high rates of lung cancer in cold and warm seasons. Also, men are found to have a higher rate of developing lung cancer than women, and middle-aged people are most likely to develop lung cancer compared to the elderly and youth.


PM2.5, O3, Air Pollution, Lung Cancer

*Siyuan (Larry) Chen and Michelle Dai are co-first authors, contributing equally to this work.

1. Introduction

Air pollution has been an inevitable side product in the process of industrialization and urbanization. The exposure to air pollutants, especially particulate matter (PM), causes the death of millions of people and the loss in billions of dollars [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] . Its impact on human health has received great attention in recent years [6] - [13] . China, as the largest developing country and the second largest economic body in the world, has been undergoing rapid economic growth in the last 30 - 40 years. They also paid a big price for this development―the environmental pollution [14] . It was reported that in 2013, the annual mean PM2.5 concentration in Beijing reached 100 micrograms per cubic meter, which is about 3 times the interim target-1 level of the World Health Organization (WHO) [13] [15] [16] . Beijing is by no means the only city in China that suffers from severe air pollution; in fact, more than 90% of Chinese cities have an annual mean PM2.5 concentration that exceeds the above WHO standard, according to a recent record of the China Environmental Status Bulletin. This situation has raised serious concerns on the impact of air pollution to the people’s health in China [17] [18] [19] .

Many elements contribute to air pollution, including total suspended particles (TSP), particulate matter (PM)―in particular PM10 and PM2.5 as measured by the particle diameter, ozone (O3), Carbon monoxide (CO), Sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), etc. Among these many pollutants, fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and ozone (O3) are suggested as the two main harmful contaminants endangering human health, in particular promoting lung diseases [20] .

Quantitative studies of the impact of air quality on human health have recently received increased attention. In the following, a brief review is given on some representative works. Li et al. [21] studied the effects of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH’s), in surface water, sediments, soils, and plants via air, water, and food pollution, on the occurrences of cancers. They used a variety of mathematical equations derived from experience or experiments to calculate correlations. Buonanno et al. [9] estimated lung cancer risk associated with airborne molecules of various elements. They utilized a modified risk-assessment scheme to estimate the contribution to cancer risks from sub-micron and super-micron molecules and proposed ways to improve air quality in Europe. Chen et al. [22] investigated the relationship between long-term exposure to PM10, NO2, and SO2 and mortality of lung cancer in northern China. Hazard ratios were estimated using Cox proportional hazard models, adjusted for age, gender, and other factors. Correlation between PM10 concentrations and lung cancer mortality was found, and associations varied across many categories. Dziubanek et al. [10] analyzed the impact of PM10, benzo(a)pyrene (BaP), cadmium (Cd) and lead (Pb) on the lifespan of 3.5 million people living in the Silesia province in Poland. They applied Pearson linear regression to determine the relation between certain elements and lifespan, and multiple regression analysis to examine the effects of mixing multiple elements. Wu et al. [13] used an exposure-response function to quantitatively estimate the health effects attributed to PM2.5 in China. Raaschou-Nielsen et al. [23] conducted a study on the individual elements that make up PM2.5 and PM10 particles to determine which elements have a greater correlation with lung disease incidence. Though there were elevated levels of correlation, no statistically significant results were found concerning the correlation between element amounts and hazard ratios for lung cancer. When the analyses were restricted to people who did not change residences during follow-up, statistically significant results for PM2.5 Cu, PM10 K, and PM2.5 S were revealed. The closest work to ours is Guo et al. [20] , which studied the association between incidences of lung cancer and PM2.5 and O3 levels, separately, using two-year average data.

In summary, most existing quantitative studies either focused on pollutants different from what we consider, or focused on PM2.5 only. Guo et al. [20] considered the effect of both PM2.5 and O3 on lung cancer incidence based on yearly-averaged data. However, the air quality varies significantly between seasons as shown in our data source, which was not captured in Guo’s study. Besides, the PM2.5 and O3 themselves usually have strong correlations with each other on a seasonal scale [24] , which means they should be jointly considered when exploring their relationship with human health.

In this study, using the first-hand data obtained in a suburban area of Beijing during the period from January 2014 to June 2016, we investigate the relationship between lung cancer incidences and air pollution, specifically examining the effects of PM2.5 and O3. Our work has two distinctions compared to exiting works. Firstly, we use monthly data to discover the relationship between the levels of air pollutants and lung cancer incidences on a seasonal scale. Furthermore, we consider the correlation between PM2.5 and O3 and explore their joint effects on human health.

2. Materials & Methods

The data of lung cancer patients on a daily scale was obtained from the Center for Disease Control located in Yunhe District of Cangzhou City, a suburban area of Beijing, China (Figure 1). Over one million people live in the metro area, and a total of over eight million people live in the city of Changzhou. Patient information, including ages and genders, were included in the dataset. The concentrations of two main air pollutants, PM2.5 and O3, were obtained from the China Air Quality Online Monitoring and Analysis Platform ( on a monthly scale.

First, the raw daily data of patients were processed into a monthly form to match with the data of air pollutants. The patients were then categorized according to their genders and ages. Three age groups are considered in our study, namely, the youth (younger than 45 years old), the middle-aged (between 45 and 65 years old), and the elderly (older than 65 years old).

Inspired by existing literature, we intend to extend on preexisting research to evaluate the relationship between the two air pollutants, i.e. PM2.5 and O3, and lung cancer incidences on a monthly scale. Our hypothesis is that there is a statistically significant relationship between them, and we intend to find a meaningful regression model for this relationship. Given the nature of our data source, finding such a model was highly challenging. We started with the linear regression models between the lung cancer incidences (Y) and PM2.5 (X1) and O3 (X2) individually and jointly, gradually enriching the model by considering the

Figure 1. The city (Cangzhou) of our study in China.

interactions (X1*X2), quadratic terms ( X 1 2 and X 2 2 ), and polynomial fitting with 10 terms up to cubic level predictors ( X 1 3 and X 2 3 ). Unfortunately, all these trials were unsuccessful, yielding high p-values between 0.5 and 0.9. It was further observed that fitting the data with higher order polynomials actually led to worse performance, which indicates that the relationship we intend to characterize may be nonlinear. Furthermore, we realized that the response variable Y here stands for the number of people (count data), which only takes integer values and violates the classic assumption of normal distribution for linear regression. With these considerations, we then further explored the Generalized Linear Model (GLM) for a better fitting. In particular, we assume a Poisson distribution for the response variable and transform the response variable to the logarithm domain. It turns out that this model resulted in a statistically significant p-value when the effect of PM2.5 (X1) and O3 (X2) are jointly considered.

We plotted the accumulation curves of the number of male and female patients in the 30 months period studied. The increasing slopes of the accumulation curves were quantitatively compared in different seasons to examine their variations with genders and seasons.

3. Results

In our collected raw data, there are 3459 lung cancer patients in total, in which 41% are females. The proportion of female patients has risen from 38.4% to 43.6% from 2014 to 2016. The proportions of patients in the age categories of youth, middle-aged, and elderly are about 6%, 58%, and 36%, respectively.

We processed the original data in Excel and conducted statistical analysis using MATLAB. As a first step, we examined the correlation between levels of PM2.5 and O3. Correlation analysis reveals that the Pearson correlation coefficient of the two air pollutants is close to −0.7 with a p-value on the order of 10−5, which verifies that there is a strong negative correlation between the levels of PM2.5 and O3, as indicated in [24] . This finding sets the foundation for our following study.

We further explored various regression models for the relationship between the lung cancer incidences (Y) and PM2.5 (X1) and O3 (X2), and finally determined that Generalized Linear Model with Poisson distribution and the following logarithm link function gives the best fit with statistical significance:

log Y 1 + X 1 + X 2 (1)

The results are shown below in Table 1.

We would like to note that in contrast to the results in [20] , applying the same regression model to PM2.5 and O3 separately does not yield models with statistical significance (with p-values of 0.737 and 0.0724, respectively). This point will be further discussed in Section 4.

We further applied the same statistical model to subgroups of patients by gender and age. The corresponding results are presented below in Tables 2-6.

Table 1. Generalized linear model: Total number of patients vs. PM2.5 and O3.

Table 2. Generalized linear model: Total number of female patients vs. PM2.5 and O3.

Table 3. Generalized linear model: Total number of male patients vs. PM2.5 and O3.

Table 4. Generalized linear model: Total number of youth patients vs. PM2.5 and O3.

Table 5. Generalized linear model: Total number of middle aged patients vs. PM2.5 and O3.

Table 6. Generalized linear model: Total number of elderly patients vs. PM2.5 and O3.

We observed that statistical significance was achieved for the male group and the middle-aged group, partially for the elderly group, but not for others. A further discussion will be given in the next section.

The above statistical analysis indicates that PM2.5 and O3 jointly make significant contributions to lung cancer instances, while they have strong negative correlation. This motivates us to further explore their individual roles in different seasons.

Figure 2 shows how the accumulated number of lung cancer patients varies within the 30 months period studied. Based on Figure 2, the accumulated lines for males (blue line in Figure 2) are remarkably steeper than the accumulated lines for females (red line in Figure 2); this means in general, males are more sensitive to the persistent air pollution than females, although data statistics indicate that the proportions of female patients have risen from 38.4% to 43.6% from 2014 to 2016. Steep slopes of the accumulation curves occur in the summer and winter seasons in 2014 and from the summer of 2015 to the spring of 2016. To further investigate their variations with seasons and discover the dominant air pollutant in different seasons, we also examine below the accumulated numbers of lung cancer patients vs. accumulated levels of PM2.5 and O3 in Figure 3(a) and Figure 3(b), respectively.

Aside from the similar phenomena between genders, Figure 3 highlights various windows in summers and winters with rapidly increasing numbers of patients. For example, Figure 3(b) indicates that lung cancer incidents increased rapidly in the winter seasons (October-January). Based on Figure 4, the slopes of the linear regression approximately doubled and tripled in the periods of Oct., 2014-Jan. 2015 and Oct. 2015-Jan. 2016, respectively. It is interesting to realize that the O3 levels were relatively low during the above winter seasons, which accounts for the rapid increase in the slopes of the accumulation curve; however, the PM2.5 levels were relatively high during these periods in north China due to the coal-powered heating supplies.

Figure 2. Accumulated number of lung cancer patients.


Figure 3. Accumulated number of lung cancer patients vs. (a) accumulated PM2.5; (b) accumulated O3.

Figure 4. Slope variation of the accumulation line of O3.

In contrast, Figure 3(a) indicates two summer periods with steep slopes when the O3 levels were relatively high and PM2.5 levels were relatively low. Combined with the negative correlation between PM2.5 and O3 found in the previous section, our results strongly suggest that the two main air pollutants, i.e. PM2.5 and O3 may alternatingly play a dominant role in the winter seasons and summer seasons, respectively.

4. Discussion

Our results provide new insights on the impacts of air pollution on human health. It is already well known that many air pollutants, such as PM2.5 and O3, have adverse effects on human health, especially on the respiratory system of human beings. However, most previous studies analyzed data on a yearly scale and have not looked into the alternating dominant role of PM2.5 and O3 in winters and summers, which have a negative correlation on a seasonal scale. Our data is set on a monthly scale from 2014 to 2016, therefore our analysis can provide more insights for relevant studies in the same area.

As a comparison, Guo et al. [20] studied a similar problem using data of a much larger scale in both time and spatial dispersion. Data of lung cancer incidence from 75 communities covering a wide range of China from 1990 to 2009 were used, and statistically significant associations were found between lung cancer incidence and PM2.5, and between lung cancer incidence and O3, separately. There are several differences between this work and ours. 1) Our data is limited in scope, so we could not find statistically significant associations between lung cancer incidence and PM2.5/O3, separately. This may not necessarily indicate flaws, but rather suggests that the data source should be jointly considered when interpreting different results. 2) We successfully identified the association of lung cancer incidence with PM2.5 and O3 jointly, which was not studied in [20] . Both results confirm the linear effects of PM2.5 and O3 on (the logarithm transform) of lung cancer incidence. 3) As Guo et al. [20] used data on a yearly scale, they could not demonstrate changes on a season scale as we did, nor did they identify the different roles PM2.5 and O3 play in different seasons.

Compared to PM2.5, O3 has more complicated effects on the respiratory system of human beings. As a powerful oxidant, ozone may damage mucous and respiratory tissues in human beings. Therefore, although the ozone layer (a portion of the stratosphere with a high concentration of ozone at about two to eight ppm) is beneficial in preventing damaging ultraviolet light from reaching the Earth’s surface, ozone is a potential respiratory hazard and pollutant near the ground level. Besides, ozone itself is a production of the photochemical reaction (by strong ultraviolet light) of nitrogen oxide (NOx) and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) coming from pollutant sources such as industrial and automobile exhaust. Therefore, the high values of the O3level, present in the summer seasons, also indicate a relatively high level of primary pollution from industries and vehicles during those seasons.

The negative relationship between PM2.5 and O3 could be because the PM2.5 is highly related to heating supplies used in winter seasons in China, while the production of O3 requires strong ultraviolet light, which is more present in the summer seasons.

There are some limitations in our study. As mentioned earlier, our data is limited in scope. In our statistical analysis, we could not verify statistically significant association of lung cancer incidence with PM2.5 and O3 for the female group and the youth group. The latter could be attributed to the small data sample (accounting for only 6% of the total). Also, we did not control for other factors that contribute to lung cancers, such as smoking and different lifestyles.

It is interesting to note that patients in the age group 45 - 65 have the highest proportion of 58%. Many assume that the elderly would have the highest proportion of lung cancer rates, but our data show that the elderly make up 36% of the total data. This could be explained by recent reports of a trend that cancer patients are getting younger. Not only do young and middle-aged people have a faster metabolism and cell activity, nowadays they also tend to live an unhealthy lifestyle of staying up late, excessive alcohol drinking, etc. Another possible reason is the excessive anxiety and pressure, which the middle-aged are experiencing with the rapid growth of the Chinese economy. In addition, our analysis indicates that lung cancer rates for the youth are insignificantly low. It is easy to understand, as the carcinogenesis of lung cells need accumulated stimulations from the environment.

In addition, our sampling pool indicates that the proportion of female patients of lung cancers has risen from 38.4% to 43.6% from 2014 to 2016 (42.9% in the year of 2015). It might be related to modern cooking habits in China―it has been reported that more than half of female patients who got lung cancers have been exposed to kitchen fumes over a long period of time. In addition, there are more and more female smokers in China; The French Association of Pulmonary Surgeons believes that females are more vulnerable to nicotine than males do, which increases lung cancer risks.

5. Conclusions and Future Work

Through this study, it is found that the PM2.5 and the O3 have significant adverse effects on the respiratory system of human beings. Methods of analysis include correlation analysis, multiple regression, and trend analysis. In contrast to previous studies, the present research is set on a monthly scale, which can provide more insights for relevant studies in the same area. Our analysis indicates PM2.5 and O3 have a negative correlation on a seasonal scale. PM2.5 and O3 also alternatingly play a dominant role in winters and summers, respectively. The above conclusions are drawn based on our current data collected in a suburban area of Beijing.

This study also finds that men have a higher rate of lung cancer development than women, and middle-aged people (45 - 65) are most likely to develop lung cancer compared to the elderly (>65) and youth (<45). The trend of cancer patients becoming younger is attributed, at least partially, to the unhealthy habits and lifestyles of the modern society.

Much work remains to be done. In our study, we classified all lung cancers as one dependent variable; each specific lung cancer could be singled out, and the effects of pollution on each specific cancer could be further investigated.

We also plan to collect more data, perhaps from other areas as well, to further examine the associations of lung cancer incidence with PM2.5 and O3 for the subgroups that we could not give a definite answer for in this study.

Then, we plan to further extend the scope of our study. Are there other pollutants besides PM2.5 and O3 that have significant impacts on the respiratory system of human beings? What would be their interactions with PM2.5 and O3, and how would they jointly influence human health?

Finally, we plan to explore other important contributors for lung cancers that are not included in our current research, such as smoking. By removing the impacts of these factors, a better understanding of the effects of air pollution to human health may be achieved.


We wish to express our deep gratitude to the Center for Disease Control located in Yunhe District of Cangzhou City for permission to access the lung cancer data.

Cite this paper

Chen, S.Y., Dai, M. and Lin, F.L. (2018) Effects of PM2.5 and O3 on Human Health at a Suburban Area of Beijing, China. Journal of Environmental Protection, 9, 870-881.


  1. 1. van Donkelaar, A., Martin, R.V., Brauer, M., Kahn, R., Levy, R., Verduzco, C. and Villeneuve, P.J. (2010) Global Estimates of Ambient Fine Particulate Matter Concentrations from Satellite-Based Aerosol Optical Depth: Development and Application. Environmental Health Perspectives, 118, 847-855.

  2. 2. Lelieveld, J., Evans, J.S., Fnais, M., Giannadaki, D. and Pozzer, A. (2015) The Contribution of Outdoor Air Pollution Sources to Premature Mortality on a Global Scale. Nature, 525, 367.

  3. 3. Liang, S., Stylianou, K.S., Jolliet, O., Supekar, S., Qu, S., Skerlos, S.J. and Xu, M. (2017) Consumption-Based Human Health Impacts of Primary PM2.5: The Hidden Burden of International Trade. Journal of Cleaner Production, 167, 133-139.

  4. 4. Mendez-Garcia, C.G., Romero-Guzman, E., Hernandez-Mendoza, H., Solis-Rosales, C. and Chavez-Lomeli, E. (2017), Assessment of the Concentrations of U and Th in PM2.5 from Mexico City and Their Potential Human Health Risk. JRNC, 314, 1767-1775.

  5. 5. Sosa, B.S., Porta, A., Lerner, J.E.C., Noriega, R.B. and Massolo, L. (2017) Human Health Risk Due to Variations in PM10-PM2.5 and Associated PAHs Levels. Atmospheric Environment, 160, 27-35.

  6. 6. Gallus, S., Negri, E., Boffetta, P., McLaughlin, J.K., Bosetti, C. and La Vecchia, C. (2008) European Studies on Long-Term Exposure to Ambient Particulate Matter and Lung Cancer. European Journal of Cancer Prevention, 17, 191-194.

  7. 7. Ouyang, Y.D. (2013) China Wakes up to the Crisis of Air Pollution. The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, 1, 12.

  8. 8. van Zelm, R., Preiss, P., van Goethem, T., Van Dingenen, R. and Huijbregts, M. (2016) Regionalized Life Cycle Impact Assessment of Air Pollution on the Global Scale: Damage to Human Health and Vegetation. Atmospheric Environment, 134, 129-137.

  9. 9. Buonanno, G., Stabile, L., Morawska, L., Giovinco, G. and Querol, X. (2017) Do Air Quality Targets Really Represent Safe Limits for Lung Cancer Risk? Science of the Total Environment, 580, 74-82.

  10. 10. Dziubanek, G., Spychala, A., Marchwinska-Wyrwal, E., Rusin, M., Hajok, I., Cwielqg-Drabek, M. and Piekut, A. (2017) Long-Term Exposure to Urban Air Pollution and the Relationship with Life Expectancy in Cohort of 3.5 Million People in Silesia. Science of the Total Environment, 580, 1-8.

  11. 11. Qiu, X.H., Duan, L., Cai, S.Y., Yu, Q., Wang, S.X., Chai, F.H., Gao, J., Li, Y.P. and Xu, Z.M. (2017) Effect of Current Emission Abatement Strategies on Air Quality Improvement in China: A Case Study of Baotou, a Typical Industrial City in Inner Mongolia. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 57, 383-390.

  12. 12. Song, C.B., et al. (2017) Air Pollution in China: Status and Spatiotemporal Variations. Environmental Pollution, 227, 334-347.

  13. 13. Wu, J.S., Zhu, J., Li, W.F., Xu, D. and Liu, J.Z. (2017) Estimation of the PM2.5 Health Effects in China during 2000-2011. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24, 10695-10707.

  14. 14. Andersson, A., Deng, J.J., Du, K., Zheng, M., Yan, C.Q., Skold, M. and Gustafsson, O. (2015) Regionally-Varying Combustion Sources of the January 2013 Severe Haze Events over Eastern China. Environmental Science & Technology, 49, 2038-2043.

  15. 15. Sun, Y.L., Jiang, Q., Wang, Z.F., Fu, P.Q., Li, J., Yang, T. and Yin, Y. (2014) Investigation of the Sources and Evolution Processes of Severe Haze Pollution in Beijing in January 2013. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 119, 4380-4398.

  16. 16. Zheng, S., Pozzer, A., Cao, C.X. and Lelieveld, J. (2015) Long-Term (2001-2012) Concentrations of Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5) and the Impact on Human Health in Beijing, China. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 15, 5715-5725.

  17. 17. Elser, M., et al. (2016) New Insights into PM2.5 Chemical Composition and Sources in Two Major Cities in China during Extreme Haze Events Using Aerosol Mass Spectrometry. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 16, 3207-3225.

  18. 18. Cao, J.H., et al. (2017) Haze, Public Health and Mitigation Measures in China: A Review of the Current Evidence for Further Policy Response. Science of the Total Environment, 578, 148-157.

  19. 19. Jin, Q., Gong, L.K., Liu, S.Y. and Ren, R. (2017) Assessment of Trace Elements Characteristics and Human Health Risk of Exposure to Ambient PM2.5 in Hangzhou, China. International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry, 97, 983-1002.

  20. 20. Guo, Y.M., Zeng, H.M., Zheng, R.S., Li, S.S., Barnett, A.G., Zhang, S.W., Zou, X.N., Huxley, R., Chen, W.Q. and Williams, G. (2016) The Association between Lung Cancer Incidence and Ambient Air Pollution in China: A Spatiotemporal Analysis. Environmental Research, 144, 60-65.

  21. 21. Li, X.Z., Yang, Y., Xu, X., Xu, C.Q. and Hong, J.L. (2016) Air Pollution from Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Generated by Human Activities and Their Health Effects in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 1360-1367.

  22. 22. Chen, X., et al. (2016) Long-Term Exposure to Urban Air Pollution and Lung Cancer Mortality: A 12-Year Cohort Study in Northern China. Science of the Total Environment, 571, 855-861.

  23. 23. Raaschou-Nielsen, O., et al. (2016) Particulate Matter Air Pollution Components and Risk for Lung Cancer. Environment International, 87, 66-73.

  24. 24. Jia, M.W., Zhao, T.L., Cheng, X.H., Gong, S.L., Zhang, X.Z., Tang, L.L., Liu, D.Y., Wu, X.H., Wang, L.M. and Chen, Y.S. (2017) Inverse Relations of PM2.5 and O3 in Air Compound Pollution between Cold and Hot Seasons over an Urban Area of East China. Atmosphere, 8, 59.