Advances in Pure Mathematics
Vol.06 No.06(2016), Article ID:66572,5 pages
10.4236/apm.2016.66030
Projections and Reflections in Vector Space
Kung-Kuen Tse
Department of Mathematics, Kean University, Union, NJ, USA

Copyright © 2016 by author and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/



Received 4 April 2016; accepted 16 May 2016; published 19 May 2016
ABSTRACT
We study projections onto a subspace and reflections with respect to a subspace in an arbitrary vector space with an inner product. We give necessary and sufficient conditions for two such transformations to commute. We then generalize the result to affine subspaces and transformations.
Keywords:
Projection, Reflection, Commute, Inner Product, Affine Subspace

1. Introduction
Two lines
and
in
are considered. When is the reflection over
followed by the reflection over
the same as the reflection over
followed by the reflection over
? It is easy to see that it is the case if and only if
or
.
When considering subspaces of
, we can ask similar questions for lines, for planes or for the mixed case of one line and one plane. Instead of addressing those cases one by one, we generalize the situation of arbitrary two linear subspaces of a vector space with an inner product.
2. Projection
Supposing that U is a vector space equipped with an inner product,
is a linear subspace of U. Given a vector
, we know from linear algebra [1] [2] that u can be decomposed uniquely as
where
is the projection of the vector u onto V and
, i.e.
Here are some elementary properties of the projection
1) 
2) 

3) 
4)
5) If V1 and V2 are subspaces of U, then

6) If V1, V2 and W are subspaces of U, then
7) If V1, V2 and W are subspaces of U, then
Lemma 2.1. Supposing that U is a linear space and V, W are two linear subspaces of U, if 

Proof. We first show that









Suppose U is a vector space and V, W are two subspaces of U. Intersecting the identity 



Denote 



Lemma 2.2. 

Poorf.
(Þ) If




(Ü) By Lemma 2.1,







Theorem 2.3. Supposing that U is a vector space and V, W are two subspaces of U, then 

Proof. (Þ) Assume that
Thus,

(Ü) Assume

Similarly,
3. Reflection over a Subspace
Supposing that U is a vector space equipped with an inner product, 

The above formula can be easily derived from the observation that

then
Lemma 3.1. Supposing that U is a vector space and V, W are two vector subspaces of U, then 

Proof.
Similarly,
Theorem 3.2. Supposing that U is a vector space and V, W are two subspaces of U, then 

Poor. By Lemma 3.1, 



4. Projection onto a Translated Subspace
Define the projection of 





Theorem 4.1. 


Proof.
Similarly,
Thus, 
(Þ) By Theorem 2.3, the first equation implies

(Ü) By Theorem 2.3, the first equation is satisifed. To show the second equation, since




which is the second equation.
5. Reflection over a Translated Subspace
We next discuss the reflection over a translated subspace. Let 








Supposing 

Similarly,
Theorem 5.1. 


Proof. 
(Þ) By Theorem 3.2, 


(Ü) We express 

By Theorem 3.2, 



Since




6. Mixed Transformations
Theorem 6.1. 


Theorem 6.2. 


Theorem 6.3. 


7. Generalizations
If we denote
Theorem 7.1.
if and only if
Theorem 7.2.
if and only if
Theorem 7.3.
if and only if 
Theorem 7.4.
if and only if 
Cite this paper
Kung-Kuen Tse, (2016) Projections and Reflections in Vector Space. Advances in Pure Mathematics,06,436-440. doi: 10.4236/apm.2016.66030
References






























