Case Reports in Clinical Medicine
Vol.06 No.10(2017), Article ID:79780,19 pages
10.4236/crcm.2017.610029

“End-Stage” Constrictive Pericarditis―A Case Report

Ramachandran Muthiah

Thoothukudi Medical College Hospital, Thoothukudi, India

Copyright © 2017 by author and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY 4.0).

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Received: August 28, 2017; Accepted: October 20, 2017; Published: October 23, 2017

ABSTRACT

Aim: To report a case of “end-stage” constrictive pericarditis with clinical manifestations such as ascites mimicking as cirrhosis of liver. Introduction: In “End-stage” constrictive pericarditis, the etiology remains unknown in majority of cases and inflammation plays a central role in its development. It has been readily confused with cirrhosis of liver in which there may be ascites, but venous pressure is normal, the neck veins are not engorged and cardiac enlargement is frequent in other causes of heart failure. Case Report: A 67 years old male presented with sudden onset of tachycardia. Clinical examination revealed right-sided heart failure, “Egg-shell” calcification in Chest X-ray and echocardiographic features of pericardial constriction such as septal bounce and dynamic respiratory changes in mitral inflow velocity. The patient was advised medical measures. Conclusion: When clinical signs of right heart failure become unresponsive to increased doses of diuretics, constrictive pericarditis is more likely the underlying disease since severe, right-sided failure develops in very advanced, the “end-stage” of the disease.

Keywords:

“End-Stage” Constrictive Pericarditis, Engorged Neck Vein, Septal Bounce, Waffle Procedure, Amniotic Stem Cell Therapy

1. Introduction

The normal pericardium is a fibroelastic sac enveloping the heart and consists of two layers. The visceral pericardium (serous pericardium) is a single layer of mesothelial cells contiguous with epicardium and a tough, fibrous layer as a parietal pericardium. When the pericardium limits the heart’s ability to function normally either due to accumulation of fluid (pericardial effusion) or scarred and inelastic (constriction), the pericardial compression syndromes may occur.

The constrictive pericarditis is typically chronic, but variants including acute, subacute, transient, occult and end-stage may occur. Historically, the eponym “Pick’s disease” was given to constrictive pericarditis with ascites and hepatomegaly [1] and it was diagnosed as having chronic liver disease and so this case had been reported.

2. Case Report

A 67 years old male was admitted with sudden onset of palpitations in the emergency room. ECG revealed tachycardia with a heart rate of 150 bpm as in Figure 1 and blood pressure 110/70 mmHg. Blood chemistry revealed normal. Physical examination showed an engorged neck vein as in Figure 2 which fails to decrease with inspiration (Kussmaul’s sign) with a deep Y descent (Freidreich’s sign) reflecting the predominant ventricular filling during early diastole, ascites and pedal edema as shown in Figure 3 suggesting a right-sided heart failure. Auscultation revealed pericardial knock, an early diastolic sound occurs due to cessation in diastolic filling and retraction of apical impulse in systole. X-ray chest revealed “egg-shell’ calcification as shown in Figure 4. Transthoracic echocardiography revealed the features of constrictive pericarditis as in Figures 5-10. Since the patient was in “end-stage” disease, he was given conservative medical measures such as diuretics, antibiotics, anti-inflammatory drugs and the rhythm was controlled with calcium channel antagonist, verapamil 40 mg three times daily as shown in Figure 11 and Figure 12.

Figure 1. ECG showing tachycardia (rate 150 bpm) in a 67 year old male with “end-stage” constrictive pericarditis.

Figure 2. Showing the “engorged neck vein” as a feature of elevated venous pressure in “end-stage” constrictive pericarditis (Photo image with consent).

Figure 3. Showing the clinical features of “end-stage” Constrictive pericarditis (Photo image with consent).

Figure 4. X-ray chest PA (postero-anterior) view showing the “egg-shell” calcification? “tortoise-shell” like and flattening of right heart border in “end-stage” constrictive pericarditis.

Figure 5. Showing the “acute angle” between the LA (left atrium) and LV (left ventricle) posterior walls and a pericardial thickness of 8 mm.

Figure 6. Apical view showing the “septal bounce” as a sign of ventricular interdependence and bulging of IAS (interatrial septum) towards LA (left atrium).

Figure 7. M-mode LV study showing the “septal notch” and “dip and flattening” of LV posterior wall.

Figure 8. Pulsed Doppler imaging showing “the dynamic respiratory change” of the mitral inflow velocity of constrictive pattern.

Figure 9. Pulsed Doppler imaging showing the increase in diastolic IVC flow reversal in both phases of respiration, but more prominent in expiration in constrictive pericarditis.

Figure 10. Subcostal view showing the dilated IVC (inferior vena cava-plethoric) with no respiratory variation.

Figure 11. ECG showing atrial fibrillation after controlling the heart rate with verapamil.

Figure 12. ECG―Rhythn is normalizing on continuation of verapamil.

3. Discussion

Review of literature

In 1669, Lower described the clinical effects of interference of cardiac diastole by a constricting fibrous pericardium. In 1756, Morgagni contributed to the understanding of pathophysiology of constrictive pericarditis. In 1828, Lancisi described the characteristic syndrome of constrictive pericarditis and in 1842 [2] , Chevers was the first to present clearly the clinical picture of chronic constrictive pericarditis. In 1870, Wilks [3] further emphasized this syndrome. In 1896, Pick described the postmortem evidence of adhesive pericarditis and an atypical fibrosis (pseudocirrhosis) of the liver and its capsule in patients with constrictive pericarditis. The thickened peritoneum over the liver is do not to the engorgement of liver itself in so-called Pick’s disease, but rather to the occurrence of acute peritonitis at the time of acute pericarditis followed by residual fibrosis. Concato described the effusion in serous cavities (polyserositis) in patients with constrictive pericarditis is due to the result of cardiac compression and inflammation of serous membranes is absent or occur secondarily.

Etiopathogenesis

Constrictive pericarditis is most commonly caused by conditions or events that cause inflammation to develop around the heart. Inflammatory process of the pericardium typically causes pain and fluid accumulation and more chronically results in fibrosis and calcification of pericardium with pericardial constriction, the process that inhibit diastolic filling of the heart. The most common antecedents are idiopathic and tuberculosis. The tuberculosis accounted for 49% of cases of constrictive pericarditis in a series reported in 1962 [4] and it was found to be the most common cause in third-world countries such as India [5] [6] . Viral pericarditis is more common in the west and in Europe and North, it is often a sequelae of cardiac surgery and mediastinal irradiation.

Constrictive pericarditis can occur after many pericardial disease processes. All causes of pericarditis can lead to subsequent constriction [7] and in acute pericarditis, only 9% of cases may go for constriction. Rheumatic fever, although frequently accompanied by pancarditis, does not result in chronic constrictive pericarditis and may have pericardial adhesion which are not maximally constricting. The pericarditis associated with uremia and myocardial infarction is not of the constricting type and most cases of effusive-constrictive pericarditis are often idiopathic, can occur in malignancy of breast and lung, tuberculosis, endomyocardial fibrosis and hypothyroidism (cholesterol pericarditis or “gold paint” pericarditis).

The causes of constrictive pericarditis are shown in Table 1.

Hemodynamic changes

The normal pericardium can stretch to accommodate the physiological changes in cardiac volume. In constrictive pericarditis, the visceral and parietal pericar-

Table 1. Showing the causes of constrictive pericarditis.

dium are fibrosed and fused together [11] , although not necessarily always thickened [12] , prevent the heart from expansion and resulting in minimal ability to adapt to volume changes and significant dynamic respiratory variation in blood flow in the chambers of the heart attributed to isolation of the cardiac chambers from intrathoracic respiratory pressure changes, i.e., dissociation between intrathoracic and intracardiac pressures with enhanced ventricular interaction as reported by Hatle et al. in 1989 [13] .

In the heart with a normal pericardium, inspiration causes a decrease in intrathoracic pressure, which is reflected in the cardiac chambers as decrease in intracardiac pressures simultaneously and there is no change in the driving pressure from the lungs across the pulmonary veins into the left atrium and across the mitral valve into the left ventricle. There is some increase in the filling of the right ventricle because of enhanced venous return, but filling of the left ventricle is unaffected throughout the cardiac cycle. In patients with constrictive pericarditis, the rigid pericardium does not allow the decrease in intrathoracic pressure to be transmitted to the left -sided chambers and there is a lower driving force from the lungs into the left side of the heart and the left ventricle becomes underfilled with a reciprocal increase in the filling of right ventricle and therefore a septal shift occurs [14] . Conversely, during expiration, there is decreased filling of the right ventricle and increased filling of the left ventricle. As both ventricles are sharing the same limited space, the chamber size and function of one ventricle affect the other ventricle and this interaction is known as “ventricular interdependence” since the amount of blood flow into one ventricle is dependent on the amount of blood flow into the other ventricle and it is enhanced in constrictive pericarditis with a discordance in right and left heart fillings.

Once the ventricular diastolic filling reaches the limitations of the pericardial restraint, the pressure and volume in the cavity rise, filling ceases, and congestion occurs [15] . If the right heart chambers are predominantly constricted, there is naturally an engorgement of neck veins as shown in Figure 2, which is constantly engorged in 86% of patients with constrictive pericarditis. The decreased compliance of right ventricle causes a rise in right atrial pressure that is greater than the fall in pleural pressure, ultimately leading to distended neck veins during inspiration [16] , called as “Kussmaul’s sign”, which may be seen in right ventricular failure, right ventricular infarction, tricuspid stenosis and restrictive cardiomyopathy. It is nonspecific for constrictive pericarditis and reflects an elevation of Jugular venous pressure (JVP) on inspiration rather than the expected decrease in JVP. When the right heart fails because of constriction of left heart chambers, it may simulate the effect of tricuspid valve disease. With more severe constriction, the peripheral edema and ascites occur. In constrictive pericarditis, the ascites occurs early, disproportionately prominent as well as recurrent and appropriately called as “ascites praecox”, followed by minimal edema as a manifestation of later part (end-stage) of the disease and it is usually confined to lower extremities and sacrum whereas in congestive heart failure, the edema appears first and ascites much later.

In isolated constrictive pericarditis, the myocardium is unaffected and therefore the systolic function and early diastolic filling are normal. In the mixed form (constrictive―restrictive―mainly due to radiation―induced, post cardiac surgery), atrophy of myocardial cells and fibrosis may develop during long-term compression by the pericardium. Both the irritation of heart by the actual process involving the myocardium and the constricting effect of left heart chambers on the right ventricle and right atrium result in atrial arrhythmias such as atrial fibrillation as shown in Figure 11 and less commonly atrial flutter as complications in chronic constrictive pericarditis. With diminution in the output of heart, the blood pressure, especially the pulse pressure tends to be low and the blood pressure decreasing even to the point of disappearance during inspiration, manifested as absence of pulse, an important sign called as “paradoxical pulse” in some of the more advanced cases. The venous pressure, on the other hand, is very much elevated and frequently exceeding 200 mm of H2O, even exceeding 300 mm of H2O. The salient features of end-stage constrictive pericarditis are shown in Table 2.

Table 2. Showing the salient features of “end-stage” constrictive pericarditis) [17] .

Diagnostic Methods

Radiological

The plain radiograph is frequently abnormal in patients with hemodynamically significant constrictive pericarditis [18] . A typical X-ray chest of a patient with constrictive pericarditis shows a normal sized heart (47%) or only mildly enlarged (16%) and moderate to marked enlargement (37%) in effusive-constrictive pericarditis [19] . Cardiac contour abnormalities, particularly the flattening of right cardiac border is a characteristic feature of constrictive pericarditis, but infrequently present. The left atrium, which is covered only partly by the pericardium may be enlarged.

Calcification of pericardium on chest X-ray strongly suggests constrictive pericarditis in patients with features of heart failure ( especially right heart failure) and it is more obvious in regions where the normal fat is found, namely in atrioventricular and interventricular grooves. A localized form of constriction in the mid ventricular segments as a result of localized severe calcification resembl-

ing a “napkin” ring shape is termed as “napkin-ring” constrictive pericarditis [20] . Once calcification has developed, it represents chronic pericarditis and roughly visible on plain films in 50% of cases [21] [22] which, if present excludes restrictive cardiomyopathy with an overall incidence of 5% to 27% [23] , but it may be as high as 44% in patients with tuberculous pericarditis [24] . Two classic patterns of pericardial calcification have been found.

1) The calcium can be thin and linear, and appears as “egg-shell calcification” around the margins of the heart (tortoise shell like) as shown in Figure 4.

2) The calcification also can appear as thick, shaggy, amorphous and historically believed to be specific for tuberculous pericarditis.

Occasionally, extensive calcification involving the interventricular septum [25] may occur in constrictive pericarditis which indicates an associated disease such as endomyocardial fibrosis as shown in Figure 13. Patients with pericardial calcification are more likely to be idiopathic in origin with features of pericardial knock, atrial arrhythmias as in this patient and have high perioperative mortality.

Thickening of pericardium occurs heterogeneously with some areas thicker than other (thinnest over the left ventricle (0.7 - 1.2 mm). A thickened pericardium (>4 mm) on its own does not indicate constrictive pericarditis [26] . In 20% of cases of constrictive pericarditis, imaging methods show a pericardium of normal thickness and in such cases, the constrictive process may be caused by epicardial rather than pericardial constriction [27] . Tuberculous constrictive peri-

Figure 13. Showing the IVS (interventricular septum) calcification in effusive-constrictive pericarditis as evidenced by mild pericardial effusion (PE) with an associated disease of Endomyocardial fibrosis.

carditis is almost always associated with pericardial thickening and mostly, the pericardial thickening is >3 mm by the time the patient becomes symptomatic and >6 mm when the patient is clinically in heart failure.

Two-dimensional Echocardiography

The thickened, constricting pericardium affects the posterior left ventricle (pericardial thickness is 8 mm) more than the posterior left atrium, which then expands at a more acute angle respected to the LV wall [28] as shown in Figure 5. IVS bounce (septal shudder or shivering septum) is the most consistent sign of CP as shown in Figure 6 with a sensitivity of 62% and specificity of 93% [29] . It is an abnormal ventricular coupling manifest by pronounced septal displacement during deep inspiration as a “paradoxical bouncing motion” of IVS initially directed towards and then away from the LV during early diastole. The inferior vena cava is plethoric (dilated without any respiratory variation in its diameter) in constrictive pericarditis as shown in Figure 10 as a manifestation of elevated venous pressures, but right ventricle may show normal contour with tubular morphology (tubularization).

M-mode findings

In constrictive pericarditis, the LV posterior wall rapidly expands posteriorly during early diastole, followed by abrupt cessation of such movement during mid and late diastole, which corresponds to abrupt termination of rapid ventricular filling [30] [31] and this lack of motion, termed “flattening” can be best observed with M-mode echocardiography [32] [33] as in Figure 7 [34] and the septum is “sigmoid-shaped” with a bulging towards left ventricle with a septal notch and distal straightening as in Figure 6.

Doppler Echocardiography

Doppler echocardiographic findings include:

1) Prominent, usually >25% increase in initial E velocity during expiration and decrease during inspiration as shown in Figure 8, the E wave is greater than A wave in both phases of respiration.

Patients with restrictive cardiomyopathy (an infiltrative process that leads to myocardial stiffening) may not show any respiratory variation in mitral inflow velocity as in Figure 14 (restrictive physiology).

Atrial fibrillation may complicate the interpretation of respiratory variation of Doppler velocities, but respiratory variation can still be appreciated regardless of cardiac cycle length.

2) The Figure 9 shows the prominant expiratory diastolic flow reversal in IVC (inferior vena cava) in constrictive pericarditis whereas in restrictive cardiomyopathy, it is more prominent during inspiration.

Cardiac catheterization

Cardiac catheterization can yield classic findings of constrictive pericarditis, but these findings are also present in restrictive cardiomyopathy which include an increase and equalization of end-diastolic pressures in all four cardiac chambers, a “dip (or drop) and plateau” pattern (square root sign) in the ventricular pressure curves as demonstrated by Hansen, et al. [35] . If the pressures are ap-

Figure 14. Pulsed Doppler imaging showing the mitral inflow velocity with no respiratory variation of restrictive pattern.

proximately equal on both sides in simultaneous recordings, a fluid bolus should theoretically increase LVEDP above RVEDP in restrictive cardiomyopathy [36] . Normally, the systolic pressure in the right ventricle and pulmonary artery does not exceed 25 mmHg and if there is predominant constriction of left heart chambers, pulmonary pressure may be twice or thrice the normal. Tachycardia, which abbreviates diastasis, may abolish the plateau in mid and late diastole, but “dip” persists in ventricular pressure tracing of constrictive pericarditis and there is such overlap that these criterias are difficult to apply in an individual case [37] [38] .

Management

The treatment of chronic constrictive pericarditis is very much discouraging, but both medical and surgical treatments have been improved greatly.

Medical therapy

The constriction may be transient or reversible. In these conditions, the constriction is due to inflammation (acute inflammatory pericarditis) and non-ste- roidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the most frequent treatment. Follow-up studies showing resolution within 2 months to 2 years (usually responding in an average of 8 weeks) and typically effective in idiopathic cases.

In chronic constrictive pericarditis, the efforts are made to keep the systemic congestion under control. Loop diuretics (torsemide if bowel edema is suspected or intravenous furosemide), thiazides and aldosterone antagonists (especially if ascites is present) may be helpful. However, the overzealous use of diuretics is not recommended and may lead to sudden death [39] . Signs of cardiac compression may disappear with suitable antituberculous drugs as in cases of tuberculous etiology and the use of adjunctive corticosteroids remain controversial since the published trials showed a reduction in mortality and no significant decrease in pericardial fluid reaccumulation or progression to constriction [40] [41] . Patients with tachycardia due to auricular flutter or auricular fibrillation may become better with the control of heart rate by digitalis [42] or it may prove of limited value [43] and ineffective in heart failure of constrictive pericarditis.

Surgical therapy

The surgical treatment of chronic constrictive pericarditis was first recommended by Delorme in 1898 and some years later, the first pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis was performed by Franz Volhard collaborates with Viktor Schmieden in 1923 and in United States by Churchill in 1929. Decreased cardiac output resulting from a chronic constrictive process may require surgical intervention.

Pericardial resection (or pericardial stripping) is a surgical procedure where the entire pericardium is pealed away from the heart, is a delicate time-consuming procedure, somewhat hazardous and it is different from Brauer’s operation (freeing the heart from thoracic cage). It was the custom to approach the heart anteriorly and to free the right heart chambers and if the whole heart is affected or elevated pulmonary pressure, it would be wise to decorticate the left heart chambers posteriorly first. In patients with heavy calcification penetrating the myocardium, the pericardium could be resected in patches and some islands of epicardium and pericardium were left intact with multiple turtle shell incisions.

It is difficult to predict preoperatively which patients are likely to respond to total pericardiectomy. Therefore, recommendations of surgery should be done cautiously in patients with mild, very advanced disease, mixed constrictive-restrictive disease, myocardial dysfunction, significant renal dysfunction and radiation induced constriction since the prognosis after pericardiectomy was reported to be poor in these disorders [44] [45] .

Waffle procedure

Constrictive pericarditis is somewhat associated with constrictive epicarditis especially in Japanese people. Constrictive epicardial thickness might leads to repeat surgery in some cases. Attempts are made to decorticate the white, fibrous, thickened layer of epicardium over the ventricles. The waffle procedure performed by incising the tight, fibrotic epicardium in a crosshatched manner releases the epicardial constriction [46] [47] [48] .

Amniotic membrane patches (amniotic stem cell therapy)

Current treatment focused on targeting inflammation cental to this disease process and has shown overall positive outcomes [49] . Amniotic stem cell therapy consisting of either stem cells with extracellular matrix or extracellular matrix alone in the form of human amniotic membrane allograft, an emerging anti-inflammatory and antifibrotic treatment [50] [51] , applied intraoperatively [52] prior to closure.

Outcome

The prognosis varies after pericardiectomy according to the etiology of constrictive pericarditis [53] . Idiopathic and tuberculous patients showed good prognosis at 5 years after pericardiectomy [54] .

Preoperative clinical status such as older age, pulmonary hypertension with concomitant myocardial dysfunction, multi-organ failure, atrial fibrillation and high mitral inflow E velocity in Doppler study [55] are related to poor prognosis and 16% of cases may not show any postoperative improvement. “Low-output syndrome” during early postoperative period occurs [56] in patients with long standing symptomatic pericardial constriction due to remodeling of ventricles and weakening of myocardium and it may gradually improves in most of the patients [57] .

Case analysis

This case was presented with sudden onset of tachycardia with features of right heart failure. Imaging studies showed an “egg-shell” calcification of pericardium, dynamic respiratory changes of mitral inflow velocity and a plethoric inferior vena cava suggesting a constrictive physiology. High venous pressure as “engorged neck vein”, atrial fibrillation, ascites and pedal edema is the manifestations of this “end-stage” disease.

4. Conclusion

Cardiac catheterization is no longer performed to diagnose constrictive pericarditis [58] . Two-dimensional echocardiography and Doppler echocardiography may provide additional diagnostic information and confirm the presence of constrictive physiology. Medical therapy may be used as a palliative measure to control symptoms and to optimize hemodynamics in this “end-stage” disease, who are not candidates for surgery [59] .

Cite this paper

Muthiah R. (2017) “End-Stage” Constrictive Pericarditis―A Case Report. Case Reports in Clinical Medicine, 6, 255-273. https://doi.org/10.4236/crcm.2017.610029

References

  1. 1. Fowler, N.O. (1995) Constrictive Pericarditis: Its History and Current Status. Clinical Cardiology, 18, 341-350. https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.4960180610

  2. 2. Chevers, N. (1842) Observations on the Diseases of the Orifice and Valves of the Aorta. Guy’s Hospital Reports, 7, 387-392.

  3. 3. Wilks, S. (1870-1871) Adherent Pericardium as a Cause of Cardiac Disease. Guy’s Hospital Reports, 16, 196.

  4. 4. Robertson, R. and Arnold, C.R. (1962) Constrictive Pericarditis with Particular Reference to Etiology. Circulation, 26, 525-529. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.26.4.525

  5. 5. Bawa, Y.S., Wahi, P.L. and Mehta, M.C. (1960) Pericarditis. A Clinical Survey of 35 Cases. Indian Journal of Medical Society, 14, 111-121.

  6. 6. Bashi, V.V., John, S., Ravikumar, E., Jairaj,J., Shyamsunder, K. and Krishnaswami, S. (1988) Early and Late Results of Pericardiectomy in 118 Cases of Constrictive Pericarditis. Thorax, 43, 637-641. https://doi.org/10.1136/thx.43.8.637

  7. 7. Hancock, E.W. (1990) Neoplastic Pericardial Disease, Cardiology Clinics, 8, 673-682.

  8. 8. Bertog, S.C., Thambidorai, S.K., Parakh, K., et al. (2004) Constrictive Pericarditis: Etiology and Cause-Specific Survival after Pericardiectomy, Journal of American College of Cardiology, 43, 1445-1452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2003.11.048

  9. 9. Flood, S.P., Ayah, O., Furukawa, S. and Norris, R.B. (2017) A Rare Cause of Constrictive Pericarditis. BMJ (British Medical Journal) Case Reports.

  10. 10. Voorhes, M.L., Husson, G.S. and Blackman, M.S. (1976) Growth Failure with Pericardial Constriction, the Syndrome of Mulibrey Nanism. American Journal of Diseases of Children, 130, 1146-1148. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.1976.02120110108017

  11. 11. White, P.D. (1951) Chronic Constrictive Pericarditis. Circulation, 4, 288-294. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.4.2.288

  12. 12. Talreja, D.R., Edwards, W.D., Danielson, G.K., Schaff, H.V., Tajik, A.J., Tazelaar, H.D., et al. (2003) Constrictive Pericarditis in 26 Patients with Histologically Normal Pericardial Thickness. Circulation, 108, 1852-1857. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000087606.18453.FD

  13. 13. Hatle, L.K., Appleton, C.P. and Popp, R.L. (1989) Differentiation of Constrictive Pericarditis and Restrictive Cardiomyopathy by Doppler Echocardiography. Circulation, 79, 357-370. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.79.2.357

  14. 14. Camm, D., Katritsis, G., Gersh, B.J. and John, A. (2013) Constrictive Pericarditis. Clinical Cardiology, Current Practice Guidelines, 388.

  15. 15. Shabetai, R., Fowler, N.O. and Guntheroth, W.G. (1970) The Hemodynamics of Cardiac Tamponade and Constrictive Pericarditis. American Journal of Cardiology, 26, 480-489. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(70)90706-X

  16. 16. Bilchick, K.C. and Wise, R.A. (2002) Paradoxical Physical Findings Described by Kussmaul: Pulsus Paradoxus and Kussmaul’s Sign. Lancet, 359, 1940-1942. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08763-9

  17. 17. Hoit, B.D. (2011) Constrictive Pericarditis. UpToDate.

  18. 18. Webb, W.R. and Higgins, C.B. (2005) Thoracic Imaging: Pulmonary and Cardiovascular Radiology. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia.

  19. 19. Hancock, E.W. (1971) Subacute Effusive, Constrictive Pericarditis. Circulation, 43, 183-192. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.43.2.183

  20. 20. Milkas, A., Van Mieghem, C., Van Hoe, L., Barbato, E. and De Bruyne, B. (2016) The “Napkin-Ring” Constrictive Pericarditis. European Heart Journal—Cardiovascular Imaging, 17, 1436. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jew203

  21. 21. Miller, S.W. (2005) Cardiac Imaging: The Requisites. 2nd Edition, Elsevier Mosby, Philadelphia.

  22. 22. Masui, T., Finck, S. and Higgins, C.B. (1992) Constrictive Pericarditis and Restrictive Cardiomyopathy: Evaluation with MR Imaging. Radiology, 182, 369-373. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.182.2.1732952

  23. 23. Ling, L.H., Oh, J.K., Breen, J.F., Schaff, H.V., Danielson, G.K., Mahoney, D.W., et al. (2000) Calcific Constrictive Pericarditis. Annals of Internal Medicine, 132, 444-450.https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-132-6-200003210-00004

  24. 24. Bozbuga, N., Erentug, V., Eren, E., Erdogan, H.B., Kirali, K., Antal, A., et al. (2003) Pericardiectomy for Chronic Constrictive Tuberculous Pericarditis: Risks and Predictors of Survival. Texas Heart Institute Journal, 30, 180-185.

  25. 25. Lima, M.V., Cardoso, J.N., Dos Reis Cardoso, C.M., Limaco, E.C.O.B.R.P. and Barretto, A.C.P. (2011) Constrictive Pericarditis with Extensive Calcification. Arquivos Brasileiros De Cardiologia, 96.

  26. 26. O’ Leary, S.M., Williams, P.L., Williams, M.P., et al. (2010) Imaging the Pericardium: Appearances on ECG-Gated 64-Detector Row Cardiac Computed Tomography. British Journal of Radiology, 83, 194-205. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/55699491

  27. 27. Nishimura, R.A. (2001) Constrictive Pericarditis in the Modern Era: A Diagnostic Dilemma. Heart, 86, 619-623. https://doi.org/10.1136/heart.86.6.619

  28. 28. D’Cruz, I.A., Dick, A., Gross, C.M., Hand, C.R. and Lalmalani, G.G. (1989) Abnormal Left Ventricular-Left Atrial Posterior Wall Contour: A New Two-Dimensional Echocardiographic Sign in Constrictive Pericarditis. American Heart Journal, 118, 128-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-8703(89)90082-3

  29. 29. Himelman, R.B., Lee, E. and Schiller, N.B. (1988) Septal Bounce, Vena Cava Plethora, and Pericardial Adhesion: Informative Two-Dimensional Echocardiographic Signs in the Diagnosis of Pericardial Constriction. Journal of American Society of Echocardiography, 1, 333-340. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0894-7317(88)80007-5

  30. 30. Feigenbaum, H. (1972) Echocardiography. Lee & Febiger, Philadelphia.

  31. 31. Popp, R.L. (1976) Echocardiographic Assessment of Cardiac Disease. Circulation, 54, 538-552. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.54.4.538

  32. 32. Schnittger, I., Bowden, R.E., Abrams, I. and Popp, R.L. (1978) Echocardiography: Pericardial Thickening and Constrictive Pericarditis. American Journal of Cardiology, 42, 388-395. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(78)90933-5

  33. 33. Voelkel, A.G., Pietro, D.A., Folland, E.D., Fisher, M.L. and Parisi, A.F. (1978) Echocardiographic Features of Constrictive Pericarditis. Circulation, 58, 871-875. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.58.5.871

  34. 34. Dai-Biano, J.P., et al. (2009) Role of Echocardiography in the Diagnosis of Constrictive Pericarditis. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography, 22, 24-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2008.11.004

  35. 35. Hansen, A.T., Eskildsen, P. and Gotzsche, H. (1961) Pressure Curves from the Right Auricle and the Right Ventricle in Chronic Constrictive Pericarditis. Circulation, 3, 881-888. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.3.6.881

  36. 36. Tyberg, T.I., Goodyer, A.V., Hurst 3rd, V.W., et al. (1981) Left Ventricular Filling in Differentiating Restrictive Amyloid Cardiomyopathy and Constrictive Pericarditis, American Journal of Cardiology, 47, 791. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(81)90175-2

  37. 37. Shabetai, R. (1992) Controversial Issues in Restrictive Cardiomyopathy. Postgraduate Medical Journal, 68, 547-551.

  38. 38. Vaitkus, P.T. and Kussmaul, W.G. (1991) Constrictive Pericarditis versus Restrictive Cardiomyopathy: A Reappraisal and Update of Diagnostic Criteria. American Heart Journal, 122, 1431-1441. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-8703(91)90587-8

  39. 39. Marshall, A., Ring, N. and Lewis, T. (2006) Constrictive Pericarditis: Lessons from the Past Five Years Experience in the South West Cardiothoracic Centre. Clinical Medicine, 6, 592-597. https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.6-6-592

  40. 40. Mayosi, B.M., Burgess, L.J. and Doubell, A.F. (2005) Tuberculous Pericarditis. Circulation, 112, 3608-3616. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.543066

  41. 41. Ntsekhe, M., Wiysonge, C., Volmink, J.A., Commerford, P.J. and Mayosi, B.M. (2003) Adjuvant Corticosteroids for Tuberculous Pericarditis: Promising, But Not Proven. Quarterly Journal of Medicine, 96, 593-599. https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcg100

  42. 42. White, P.D. (1951) Chronic Constrictive Pericarditis. Circulation, 4, 288-294. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.4.2.288

  43. 43. Mehta, A., Mehta, M. and Jain, A.C. (1999) Constrictive Pericarditis. Clinical Cardiology, 22, 334-344. https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.4960220509

  44. 44. Ling, L.H., Oh, J.K., Schaff, H.V., et al. (1999) Constrictive Pericarditis in the Modern Era: Evolving Clinical Spectrum and Impact on Outcome after Pericardiectomy, Circulation, 100, 1380-1386. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.100.13.1380

  45. 45. Seifert, F.C., Miller, D.C., Oesterle, S.N., Oyer, P.E., Stinson, E.B. and Shumway, N.E. (1985) Surgical Treatment of Constrictive Pericarditis: Analysis of Outcome and Diagnostic Error. Circulation, 72, 264-273.

  46. 46. Heimbecker, R.O., Smith, D., Shimizu, S. and Kestle, J. (1983) Surgical Technique for the Management of Constrictive Epicarditis Complicating Constrictive Pericarditis (The Waffle Procedure). Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 36, 605-606. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(10)60693-5

  47. 47. Shiraishi, M., Yamaguchi, A., Muramatsu, K., Kimura, N., Yuri, K., Matsumoto, H., et al. (2015) Validation of Waffle Procedure for Constrictive Pericarditis with Epicardial Thickening. General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 63, 30-37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-014-0434-6

  48. 48. Matsuura, K., Mogi, K. and Takahara, Y. (2015) Off-Pump Waffle Procedure Using an Ultrasonic Scalpal for Constrictive Pericarditis. European Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 47, e220-222. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezu554

  49. 49. Syed, F.F., Schaff, H.V. and Oh, J.K. (2014) Constrictive Pericarditis—A Curable Diastolic Heart Failure. Nature Reviews Cardiology, 11, 530-544. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrcardio.2014.100

  50. 50. Hemphil, C., Stavoe, K. and Khalpey, Z. (2014) First in Man: Amniotic Stem Cell Injection Promotes Scar Remodeling and Healing Processes in Late-Stage Fibrosis, International Journal of Cardiology, 174, 442-443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.04.023

  51. 51. Khalpey, Z., Marsh, K.M., Ferng, A., Riaz, I.B., Friedman, M., Indik, J., Avery, R., Jokerst, C. and Oliva, I. (2015) First in Man: Amniotic Patch Reduces Post-Operative Inflammation. American Journal of Medicine, 128, e5-e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.08.028

  52. 52. Marsh, K.M., et al. (2017) Anti-Inflammatory Properties of Amniotic Membrane Patch Following Pericardiectomy for Constrictive Pericarditis. Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 12, 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-017-0567-7

  53. 53. Avgerinos, D., Rabitnokov, Y., Worku, B., Neragi-Miandoab, S. and Girardi, L.N. (2014) Fifteen-Year Experience and Outcome of Pericardiectomy for Constrictive Pericarditis. Journal of Cardiac Surgery, 29, 434-438. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocs.12344

  54. 54. Szabo, G., Schmack, B., Bulut, C., Soos, P., Weymann, A., Stadtfeld, K., et al. (2013) Constrictive Pericarditis: Risks, Aetiologies and Outcomes after Total Pericardi-ectomy: 24 Years of Experience. European Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 44, 1023-1028. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezt138

  55. 55. Kang, S.H., Song, J.M., Kim, M., Choo, S.J., Chung, C.H., Kang, D.H., et al. (2014) Prognostic Predictors in Pericardiectomy for Chronic Constrictive Pericarditis. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 147, 598-605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.01.022

  56. 56. Garg, P., et al. (2015) Mid-term Outcome of Surgery for Chronic Constrictive Pericarditis: A Single Center Experience. American Journal of Advanced Medicine & Surgical Research, 1, 9-14.

  57. 57. Omoto, T., Minami, K., Varvaras, D., Bothig, D. and Korfer, R. (2001) Radical Pericardiectomy for Chronic Constrictive Pericarditis. Asian Cardiovascular and Thoracic Annals, 9, 286-290. https://doi.org/10.1177/021849230100900409

  58. 58. Sohn, D.-W. (2012) Constrictive Pericarditis as a Never Ending Story: What’s New? Korean Circulation Journal, 42, 143-150. https://doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2012.42.3.143

  59. 59. Adler, Y., Charron, P., Imazio, M., Badano, L., Baron-Esquivias, G., Bogaert, J., et al. (2015) ESC Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Pericardial Disease, European Heart Journal, 36, 2921-2964. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv318

Journal Menu >>