Advances in Microbiology
Vol.08 No.03(2018), Article ID:83243,9 pages

Isolation, Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profile Analysis of Vibrio cholerae O1 from Stool Samples of Bangladesh

Muhammad Ekhlas Uddin1*, Tanzina Akter2,3, Papia Sultana1, Md. Ikramul Hasan1, Mahbuba Akter Lubna4, Hasan Al Monem5, Md. Anowar Khasru Parvez3, Shamsun Nahar3, Md. Sumon Khan1

1Department of Microbiology, Primeasia University, Dhaka, Bangladesh

2National Institute of Biotechnology, Dhaka, Bangladesh

3Department of Microbiology, Jahangirnagar University, Dhaka, Bangladesh

4Department of Microbiology, Stamford University Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh

5Department of Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering, Jahangirnagar University, Dhaka, Bangladesh

Copyright © 2018 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY 4.0).

Received: December 16, 2017; Accepted: March 20, 2018; Published: March 23, 2018


Cholera is a severe diarrheal disease which is usually caused by toxigenic strain of Vibrio cholerae O1 and O139. Cholera is still one of the major health concerns in developing countries like Bangladesh due to poor sanitation and unavailability of safe drinking water. This experiment was confronted to identify V. cholerae O1 from stool samples as well as to determine the antibiotic susceptibility pattern of the isolated strains. A total of 140 stool samples from people infected with diarrheal disease were collected from July 2016 to December 2016. Among all, 58 samples were found positive for V. cholerae which were further subjected to sero-grouping by specific anti-sera and antimicrobial susceptibility test by Kirby Bauer disc diffusion method. The zones of inhibition were measured and interpreted by following the recommendations of the criteria of Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). It was found that 43 (74.1%) isolates of V. cholerae were O1 serogroup of Ogawa serotype and the rest 15 (25.9%) were O1 serogroup of Inaba serotype. People aged between 41 - 50 were most susceptible to V. cholerae O1 having about 39.7% of positive cases. The isolates were highly susceptible to Ciprofloxacin and Gentamicin with 100% susceptibility whereas 100% resistant was found towards Nalidixic acid. Though most of the isolates in our study were susceptible against tested antibiotics, the continuous surveillance is required to see the changing pattern of serogroups or serotypes and antimicrobial profile in this region.


Cholera, Antibiotic Resistant, Vibrio cholerae

1. Introduction

Cholera is an acute and life-threatening diarrheal disease. It occurs in epidemic form in many developing countries like Bangladesh. It is usually associated with unavailability of safe drinking water, poor socio-economic conditions, rudimentary sanitary systems and public hygiene [1] .

The causative agent of cholera is Vibrio cholerae, a gram negative organism. This bacterium has more than 200 serogroups. But only the serogroup V. cholerae O1 and O139 produce cholera toxin (CT) and have been associated with epidemic and pandemic cholera [2] . The other non-O1, non-O139 serogroups are usually associated with sporadic gastroenteritis [3] .

Cholera is one of the major public health burdens with a high morbidity and mortality rate around the globe [4] . Every year millions of people die of this deadly disease. Though much efforts have been made to identify the actual number of cholera cases, 90% - 95% cases of cholera remain unnoticed due to insufficient surveillance system and poor socio-economic condition. According to World Health Organization (WHO), every year about 3 to 5 million positive cases of cholera are reported which represents only 5% - 10% of the actual number of cholera cases [5] [6] [7] [8] .

Over the years, a number of cholera outbreaks were reported by WHO which cost millions of lives. In 2008-2009, Zimbabwe experienced 8 months long cholera outbreak with estimated 96,591 positive cases and 4201 deaths [9] [10] . In 2010, Nigeria faced epidemic form of cholera around the country costing 352 lives with 6400 positive cases [11] . After a long absence of cholera, Haiti experienced a deadly form of it in 2011 that killed 4533 people and made some 234,303 people sick [12] . In 2012, Sierra Leone fought against cholera but lost 290 lives in 21,500 positive cases [13] . African country Ghana experienced this deadly cholera outbreak for several times from 2011 to 2014. According to WHO in 2014, approximately 14,411 cases of cholera were found in Ghana and 127 died due to it [14] [15] [16] . Recently, cholera outbreak in Yemen is reported as one of the most severe cholera outbreaks in the history which surpassed about 200,000 positive cases with an increase of 5000 new cases each day [17] . Bangladesh is one of the most vulnerable countries of South East Asia for cholera outbreak. As reported by experts, every year an estimated 352,000 cholera cases are recorded in Bangladesh among which 3500 to 7000 death [18] .

The purposes of present study were to isolate V. cholerae O1 from patients stool sample collected from a tertiary care hospital of Bangladesh and to determine their antimicrobial susceptibility towards locally available antibiotics to provide information to develop empirical treatment of cholera.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection and Processing

Present study was conducted in Microbiology laboratory of Primeasia University, Banani, Dhaka-1213. Total 140 stool samples were collected from patients with diarrheal symptoms admitted in a hospital located at middle Badda in Dhaka city of Bangladesh. Samples were collected during the month of July 2016 to December 2016. All the collected samples were transported inside an insulated foam box with ice bags to the laboratory by maintaining temperature within 4˚C to 6˚C to avoid contamination. Microbiological examination was done promptly to avoid undesirable change. Stool samples were directly inoculated onto MacConkey and Thiosulphate Citrate-Bile-Salt Sucrose (TCBS) agar and then incubated at 37˚C for 24 hours. Following incubation, colonies that produced lactose negative or slightly pink colors on MacConkey and yellow color on TCBS were initially suspected as V. cholerae and were isolated as pure culture by sub-culturing single colonies onto Nutrient agar.

A battery of biochemical tests was performed following the standard procedure for further confirmation of V. cholerae [19] [20] . These are Oxidase test, Catalase test, Gelatinase test, Kligler’s iron agar (KIA) test, Motility indole urease (MIU) test, Fermentation of carbohydrates (glucose, inositol, mannitol, sucrose, mannose, arabinose), lysine and ornithine decarboxylase, arginine dihydrolase, and salt tolerance are tested using broths with 0%, 6.5% and 8% NaCl concentrations.

Serogroup of V. cholerae was determined by slide agglutination assay with V. cholerae O1 and O139 antisera. One drop of phosphate buffered saline (PBS) was added in microscope slide. A loopful of fresh bacterial culture grown on Nutrient agar was suspended into drop of PBS. A drop of equal sized of group O1 polyvalent antiserum was added to the drop. The antiserum-culture suspension was mixed by tilting the slide back and forth. Presence of agglutination within 1 minute indicated a positive result. Isolates those reacted with anti-O1 were further sub typed using antisera specific for Ogawa, Inaba and Hikojima strains.

2.2. Antibiotic Sensitivity Assay

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was done using the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) recommendations [21] . Briefly, a single colony of V. cholerae O1 were lightly touched with a loop and inoculated in a tube containing 2 ml of Mueller Hinton broth and incubated for a few hours at 37˚C until the suspension became slightly turbid. Then the suspension was diluted with sterile saline to adjust with 0.5 MacFarland standard (3 × 108 CFU/ml). A sterile non toxic cotton swab was dipped into the standardized suspension and streaked uniformly on Mueller Hinton agar plate after squeezing off extra fluid on the walls of the tube. The inoculated plate was allowed to dry for about five minutes and the appropriate antibiotic discs were then applied using sterile forceps and incubated overnight at 37˚C. The commercial antibiotic discs (HiMedia, Mumbai, India) used included: Kanamycin (30 µg), Imipenem (10 µg), Ciprofloxacin (5 µg), Chloramphenicol (30 µg), Azithromycin (15 µg), Nitrofurantoin (300 µg), Gentamicin (10 µg), Tetracycline (30 µg), Ceftriaxone (30 µg), Doxycycline (30 µg), Amoxicillin (10 µg) and Nalidixic Acid (30 µg). After the incubation, the inhibition zone diameters were measured and interpreted by following the recommendations of the criteria of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) [21] . E. coli (ATCC 25922) was used as control organism in our study.

3. Results

Among 140 stool samples, 58 V. cholerae were isolated. Based on serological confirmation, it was found that 43 (74.1%) isolates of V. cholerae were V. cholerae O1, serotype Ogawa and the rest 15 (25.9%) were serotype Inaba.

Significant difference was found in case of relationship between age and V. cholerae O1 infection. It was observed that the majority of people infected with V. cholerae O1 were between the ages of 41 - 50 years which was about 39.7% of all cases. People aged between 11 - 30 years were at least risk of infection having a percentage of only 1.7 (Table 1).

Antimicrobial susceptibility tests revealed that V. cholerae O1 showed 100% susceptibility to Gentamicin and Ciprofloxacin followed by 96.6% susceptibility to Kanamycin, 94.8% to Chloramphenicol and 91.4% susceptibility to Imipenem (Table 2). The isolated strains showed 82.8% susceptibility to Azythromycin and

Table 1. Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of V. cholerae O1 isolated from stool sample.

Table 2. Percentages of V. cholerae O1 positive patients according to age.

Doxycycline followed by 70.7% and 74.1% to Tetracycline and Ceftriaxone respectively. Besides, they showed least level of susceptibility to Nitrofurantoin (56.9%) and Amoxicillin (29.3%). All the isolates were found resistant to Nalidixic acid (Table 2).

4. Discussion

Cholera is an acute enteric disease that not only confined to developing countries but also spread throughout the world. This epidemic disease is still one of the major health concerns in many parts of Latin America, Africa and Southeast Asia [22] .

Cholera is quite common in Bangladesh as seasonal outbreak of cholera is like annual occurrence in this country [23] . Though fluid and ORS (oral rehydration solution) are generally prescribed for the treatment of cholera, antibiotics are also needed in severe cases [24] .

Effective use of antibiotics in diarrheal disease could potentially reduce the duration of diarrhea as well as excretion of pathogenic bacteria but may also increase the risk of generating multi drug resistant strains [25] [26] .

Present study showed that, among 58 V. cholerae O1 isolates, 43 were of Ogawa serotype which was about 74.1%, whereas about 25.9% were of Inaba serotype. This result indicated the prevalence of V. cholerae O1 serotype Ogawa in the region of Bangladesh but disagreed with the findings of Pal et al. (2006) where they found the dominancy of V. cholerae O1 serotype Inaba which was about 66.07% in Orissa, India in 2005 [27] . Our study correlated the prevalence of V. cholerae O1 among diverse aged people. Middle aged people, age ranging from 31 - 50 years were mostly affected with V. cholerae O1, having 38 positive cases among 58 cases. Children and older people those are most vulnerable were at medium risk in our study which differs with the result of Adagbada et al. (‎2012) where they found less stomach acid producers like young children and older people are at great risk in having V. cholerae O1 mediated cholera [28] .

In our study, all the isolates showed 100% sensitivity towards both Ciprofloxacin and Gentamicin which support the result of Ukaji et al. (2015) and Urassa et al. (2000) in case of Ciprofloxacin but Shukla et al. (2008) found opposite result from us where they reported that 100% of V. cholerae O1 were resistant against Ciprofloxacin in a study in East Delhi, India [26] [29] [30] . However, most of the isolates were sensitive to Kanamycin, Imipenem and Chloramphenicol which was about 96.6%, 91.4% and 94.8% respectively. This result corroborates the findings of Das et al. (2011) where they showed that 98.3% of V. cholerae O1 isolates were sensitive to Chloramphenicol [31] . Both Doxycycline and Azithromycin that are commonly recommended for the treatment guideline of cholera, showed 82.8% sensitivity in our study. This finding is quite similar with the result of Barati et al. (2015) where 84.7% sensitivity towards Doxycycline was observed in Alborz Province, Iran in 2011 [32] . Tetracycline which was accepted by Word Health Organization as drug of choice for cholera outbreak, in our study had 70.7% sensitivity, followed by Ceftriaxone of 74.1% sensitivity.

V. cholerae O1 expressed highest resistance against Amoxicillin and Nitrofurantoin after Nalidixic acid where they showed 70.7% and 43.1% resistance respectively. Resistance pattern against Amoxicillin is similar with the findings of Murhekar et al. (2013), where 75.8% of V. cholerae isolates were resistant against Amoxicillin [33] . Only Nalidixic acid was found to be 100% resistant by all the isolates of V. cholerae O1 which ultimately supports the result of Rahbar et al. in 2007 [34] . Resistance to Nalidixic acid might be due to over use to human and animal feed, spontaneous mutation in V. cholerae, and transfer of resistance genes between gut coliforms or other co-existing microflora and Vibrio spp. [35] [36] .

Our study had some inherent limitations. All the samples were collected from a specific hospital and the number of samples are quite small. If a bigger amount of samples could be collected then the outcome would be more clear and vivid. This study also lacks molecular data that could support our result more strongly.

5. Conclusion

Our study revealed that, prevalence of Ogawa serotype of V. cholerae O1 was higher than Inaba serotype among cholera cases and people aged between 41 - 50 years were found more susceptible to cholera. From this study, it can be concluded that Nalidixic acid and Amoxicillin should be avoided empirically for treating cholera. Moreover, Ciprofloxacin and Gentamicin would be a better option for the treatment of cholera.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Cite this paper

Uddin, M.E., Akter, T., Sultana, P., Hasan, Md.I., Lubna, M.A., Al Monem, H., Parvez, Md.A.K., Nahar, S. and Khan, Md.S. (2018) Isolation, Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profile Analysis of Vibrio cholerae O1 from Stool Samples of Bangladesh. Advances in Microbiology, 8, 188-196.


  1. 1. Du Preez, M., Venter, S.N. and Theron, J. (2003) Detection of Viable Toxigenic Vibrio cholerae and Virulent Shigella spp. in Environmental Waters by Pit-Stop Seminested Polymerase Chain Reaction Assays. Water SA, 29, 177-182.

  2. 2. Rivera, I.N., Chun, J., Huq, A., Sack, R.B. and Colwell, R.R. (2001) Genotypes Associated with Virulence in Environmental Isolates of Vibrio cholerae. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 67, 2421-2429.

  3. 3. Kaper, J.B., Morris, J.R. and Levine, M.M. (1995) Cholera. Clinical Microbiology Review, 8, 48-86.

  4. 4. Ali, M., Nelson, A.R., Lopez, A.L. and Sack, D.A. (2015) Updated Global Burden of Cholera in Endemic Countries. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 9, e0003832.

  5. 5. Sack, D.A. (2003) When Should Cholera Vaccine Be Used in Cholera-Endemic Areas? Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition, 299-303.

  6. 6. Griffith, D.C., Kelly-Hope, L.A. and Miller, M.A. (2006) Review of Reported Cholera Outbreaks Worldwide, 1995-2005. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 75, 973-977.

  7. 7. Zuckerman, J.N., Rombo, L. and Fisch, A. (2007) The True Burden and Risk of Cholera: Implications for Prevention and Control. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 7, 521-530.

  8. 8. Ali, M., Lopez, A.L., You, Y.A., Kim, Y.E., Sah, B., Maskery, B., et al. (2012) The Global Burden of Cholera. Bulletin World Health Organization, 90, 209-218A.

  9. 9. World Health Organization. Cholera in Zimbabwe: Epidemiological Bulletin Number 16 Week 13 (22-28 March 2009). March 31, 2009.

  10. 10. Zimbabwe: Cholera Outbreak Kills 294. The New York Times. Associated Press. 22 November 2008. Retrieved 2011-02-26.

  11. 11. Cholera Epidemic Death Toll Rises to 352, MSNBC, 25 August 2010.

  12. 12. Chao, D.L., Halloran, M.E. and Longini I.M. (2011) Vaccination Strategies for Epidemic Cholera in Haiti with Implications for the Developing World. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 7081-7085.

  13. 13. Vaccine News Reports (2012) Cholera Outbreak in Sierra Leone Slows. Wednesday, 31 October 2012.

  14. 14. Davies-Teye, B.B., Vanotoo. L., Yabani, J.B. and Kwakye-Maclean, C. (2014) Socio-Economic Factors Associated with Cholera Outbreak in Southern Ghana, 2012: A Case-Control Study. Value in Health, 17, A128.

  15. 15. WHO, Global Health Atlas.

  16. 16. WHO.

  17. 17. WHO.

  18. 18. Koepke, A.A., Longini, Jr. I.M., Halloran, M.E., Wakefield, J. and Minin, V.N. (2016) Predictive Modeling of Cholera Outbreaks in Bangladesh. The Annals of Applied Statistics, 10, 575-595.

  19. 19. Tamrakar, A.K., Goel, A.K., Kamboj, D.V. and Singh, L. (2006) Surveillance Methodology for Vibrio cholerae in Environmental Samples. International Journal of Environmental Health Research, 16, 305-312.

  20. 20. Nair, G.B., Misra, S.U., Bhadra, R.K. and Pal, S.C. (1987) Evaluation of the Multi Test Medium for Rapid Presumptive Identification of Vibrio cholerae from Environmental Sources. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 53, 1203-1205.

  21. 21. Wayne, P.A. (2014) Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: Twenty-Fourth Informational Supplement, M100-S24. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), 34(1).

  22. 22. Shears, P. (2001) Recent Developments in Cholera. Current Opinion of Infectious Diseases, 14, 553-558.

  23. 23. Mrityunjoy, A., Kaniz, F., Fahmida, J., Shanzida, J.S., Uddin, M.A. and Noor, R. (2013) Prevalence of Vibrio cholerae in Different Food Samples in the City of Dhaka, Bangladesh. International Food Research Journal, 20, 1017-1022.

  24. 24. Casburn-Jones, C. and Farthing, M. (2004) Management of Infectious Diarrhoea. Gut, 53, 296-305.

  25. 25. World Health Organization (1999) Cholera in 1998. Weekly Epidemiological Record, 74, 257-254.

  26. 26. Ukaji, D.C., Kemajou, T.S., Ajugwo, A.O., Ezeiruaku, F.C. and Eze, E.M. (2015) Antibiotic Susceptibility Patterns of Vibrio cholerae O1 Isolated during Cholera Outbreak in Uzebba (Edo State). Open Science Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 2, 33-36.

  27. 27. Pal, B.B., Khuntia, H.K., Samal, S.K., Das, S.S. and Chhotray, G.P. (2006) Emergence of Vibrio cholerae O1 Biotype El Tor Serotype Inaba Causing Outbreaks of Cholera in Orissa, India. Japanese Journal of Infectious Diseases, 59, 266-269.

  28. 28. Adagbada, A.O., Adesida, S.A., Nwaokorie, F.O., Niemogha, M.-T. and Coker, A.O. (2012) Cholera Epidemiology in Nigeria: An Overview. The Pan African Medical Journal, 12, 59.

  29. 29. Urassa, W.K., Mhando, Y.B., Mhalu, F.S. and Mjonga, S.J. (2000) Antimicrobial Susceptibility Pattern of Vibrio cholerae O1 Strains during Two Cholera Outbreaks in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. East African Medical Journal, 77, 350-353.

  30. 30. Shukla, D., Rumpa, S. and Kaur, I.R. (2008) Trend of Antibiotic Resistance of Vibrio cholerae Strains from East Delhi. Indian Journal of Medical Research, 127, 478-482.

  31. 31. Das, S., Choudhry, S., Saha, R., Ramachandran, V.G., Kaur, K. and Sarkar, B.L. (2011) Emergence of Multiple Drug Resistance Vibrio cholerae O1 in East Delhi. The Journal of Infection in Developing Countries, 5, 294-298.

  32. 32. Barati, H., Moradi, G., Rasouli, M.A. and Mohammadi, P. (2015) Epidemiologic and Drug Resistance Pattern of Vibrio cholerae O1 Biotype El Tor, Serotype Ogawa, in the 2011 Cholera Outbreak, in Alborz Province, Iran. Jundishapur Journal of Microbiology, 8, e23477.

  33. 33. Murhekar, M., Dutta, S., Ropa, B., Dagina, R., Posanai, E. and Rosewell, A. (2013) Vibrio cholerae Antimicrobial Drug Resistance, Papua New Guinea, 2009-2011. Western Pacific Surveillance and Response Journal: WPSAR, 4, 60-62.

  34. 34. Rahbar, M., Sabourian, R., Saremi, M., Abbasi, M., Masoumi, A.H. and Soroush, M. (2007) Epidemioloic and Drug Resistant Pattern of Vibrio cholerae O1 Biotype EL Tor, Serotype Inaba during the Summer of 2005 Outbreak in Iran. Journal of Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, 7, 41-45.

  35. 35. Shrestha, U.T., Adhikari, N., Maharjan, R., Banjara, M.R., Rijal, K.R., Basnyat, S.R. and Agrawal, V.P. (2015) Multidrug Resistant Vibrio cholerae O1 from Clinical and Environmental Samples in Kathmandu City. BMC Infectious Diseases, 15, 104.

  36. 36. Das, S., Saha, R. and Kaur, I.R. (2008) Trend of Antibiotic Resistance of Vibrio cholerae Strains from East Delhi. Indian Journal of Medical Research, 127, 478-482.