Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics
Vol.04 No.10(2016), Article ID:71306,9 pages
10.4236/jamp.2016.410189
Generalized Uncertainty Relations, Curved Phase-Spaces and Quantum Gravity
Carlos Castro1,2,3
1Quantum Gravity Research, Topanga, CA, USA
2Center for Theoretical Studies of Physical Systems, Atlanta, USA
3Clark Atlanta University, Atlanta, GA, USA

Copyright © 2016 by author and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY 4.0).
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/



Received: August 29, 2016; Accepted: October 15, 2016; Published: October 19, 2016
ABSTRACT
Modifications of the Weyl-Heisenberg algebra
are proposed where the classical limit
corresponds to a metric in (curved) momentum spaces. In the simplest scenario, the 2D de Sitter metric of constant curvature in momentum space furnishes a hierarchy of modified uncertainty relations leading to a minimum value for the position uncertainty
. The first uncertainty relation of this hierarchy has the same functional form as the stringy modified uncertainty relation with a Planck scale minimum value for
at
. We pro- ceed with a discussion of the most general curved phase space scenario (cotangent bundle of spacetime) and provide the noncommuting phase space coordinates algebra in terms of the symmetric
and nonsymmetric
metric com- ponents of a Hermitian complex metric
, such
. Yang’s noncommuting phase-space coordinates algebra, combined with the Schro- dinger-Robertson inequalities involving angular momentum eigenstates, reveals how a quantized area operator in units of
emerges like it occurs in Loop Quantum Gravity (LQG). Some final comments are made about Fedosov deformation quanti- zation, Noncommutative and Nonassociative gravity.
Keywords:
Uncertainty Relations, Gravity, Finsler Geometry, Born Reciprocity, Phase Space

Generalized Uncertainty Relations
Recently, we studied the generalized gravitational field equations in curved phase spaces (the cotangent bundle of spacetime) [1] . A nontrivial solution generalizing the Hilbert-Schwarzschild black hole metric in spacetime was found. The most relevant physical consequence is that the metric becomes momentum-dependent (observer dependent) which is what one should aim for in trying to quantize geometry (gravity): The observer must play an important role in any measurement (observation) process of the spacetime he/she lives in.
Most of the work devoted to Quantum Gravity has been focused on the geometry of spacetime rather than phase space per se. The first indication that phase space should play a role in Quantum Gravity was raised by [2] . The principle of Born’s reciprocal relativity [2] was proposed long ago based on the idea that coordinates and momenta should be unified on the same footing, and consequently, if there is a limiting speed (temporal derivative of the position coordinates) in Nature given by the speed of light, there should be a maximal force as well, since force is the temporal derivative of the momentum. An upper bound on the force does not imply that there is a maximum momentum. Likewise, in ordinary Special Relativity, an upper bound (speed of light) on the velocity does not imply that there is a maximum length. To sum up, a direct consequence of the Born reciprocity principle is that a maximal speed limit (speed of light) should be accompanied with a maximal proper force.
It is better understood now that the Planck-scale modifications of the particle dispersion relations can be encoded in the nontrivial geometrical properties of momentum space [3] . When both spacetime curvature and Planck-scale deformations of momentum space are present, it is expected that the nontrivial geometry of momentum space and spacetime get intertwined. The interplay between spacetime curvature and non- trivial momentum space effects was essential in the notion of “relative locality” and in the deepening of the relativity principle [3] . Recently the authors [4] described the Hamilton geometry of the phase space of particles whose motion is characterized by general dispersion relations. Explicit examples of two models for Planck-scale modified dispersion relations, inspired from the q-de Sitter and k-Poincare quantum groups, were considered. In the first case they found the expressions for the momentum and position dependent curvature of spacetime and momentum space, while for the second case the manifold is flat and only the momentum space possesses a nonzero, momentum dependent curvature.
We shall focus in this work on two main points. Firstly, on solutions to the field equations in momentum space with the inclusion of the momentum analog of a cosmologically constant
.
(1)
the solutions to the above field equations will be used in the modified uncertainty relations. The momentum-space analog
of the cosmological constant should not be confused with the spacetime one.
Secondly, on the rotationally invariant commutator of the form [5]
(2)
one can see that under rotations
(3)
the left and right hand side of Equation (2) become
(4)
and the commutator relations remain invariant. Consequently, if one is to set
, a rotationally invariant commutator can be associated to a classi- cal momentum space metric of the form
(5)
A close inspection reveals that the 4D momentum-space metric analog of the de Sitter metric in a 4D spacetime (written in static coordinates and using the momentum- space analog of the cosmological constant

does not have the required form indicated by Equation (5). To verify this one simply rewrites the de Sitter metric in Cartesian coordinates. One then finds that the rota- tionally invariant commutation relations, leading to the metrics (5), are not compatible with a spherically symmetric momentum space de Sitter metric (6).
One may insert the metric (5) into the field equations in momentum space in order to determine whether or not there exist actual functions 

which is trivially rotational invariant. 
momentum space when
to coincide with the Planck length 

Inspired by the 2D de Sitter momentum space metric (7), and by promoting the classical momentum variable 




One may notice that since 




consistent with the cosmological momentum-horizon 



Inserting the inequality of the equation below

into Equation (8), yields to leading order in

which has the same functional form as the stringy modified uncertainty relations [6] , with the main difference being that now one has the cosmological momentum-horizon


(11).
The minimum value for the position uncertainty is 
and which coincides with the location of the cosmological momentum horizon. If one equates the minimum value of the position uncertainty to the Planck scale length it gives

To sum up, to leading order in L, the de Sitter momentum space metric in 2D
furnishes: 1) a cosmological momentum-horizon 
cutoff; 2) a Planck scale minimal length uncertainty for the position coordinate


The next-to-leading order term can be obtained after using the inequality

that simply follows from

after replacing 


The minimum position uncertainty now turns out to be 

The value of 

on Equation (12a), Equation (12b), by a process of successive squaring, a hierarchy of modified uncertainty relations of the form are derived

The most salient feature of the modified uncertainty relations (11), (12c), (12d) is that there is a minimum value for the position uncertainty
In general one can postulate the following modification of the Weyl-Heisenberg algebra

combined with the additional commutation relations

with the provision that the above commutators obey the Jacobi identities [5] . A nonvanishing 










The more general commutator than the one in Equation (13)

may be chosen such that the classical limit 




An important remark is in order. By Hermitian metric one usually means


example if

the argument of the metric matrix is Hermitian. Similarly, by anti-Hermitian metric one usually means
Since the commutator of two Hermitian operators in anti-Hermitian, one may postulate the following commutators below (in a fully relativistic phase space) given in terms of of a real metric which has both symmetric 






the right hand sides are anti-Hermitian due to








It is at this point where the following Schrodinger-Robertson inequalities for 2n observables 



the covariance is defined as

uncorrelated variables have zero covariance. The uncertainty squared is

For the 2n phase space coordinates, the 



Due to the nontrivial commutation relations (16)-(18), the Schrodinger-Robertson inequalities 
Closely related to the nontrivial commutation relations (16)-(18) is Yang’s algebra in an 8D Noncommutative phase space [11]







Yang’s algebra can be obtained simply by replacing

and recurring to the angular momentum algebra in 6D. The Jacobi identities are satisfied because the angular momentum algebra in 6D obeys them. The noncommuting coordinates and momenta are just rotations/boosts involving the extra directions. 








One may notice that Yang’s algebra and the algebra of Eqsuations (16)-(18) bears a certain resemblance if one were to set the numerical coefficient B to zero;







which bears a similarity to the results associated to the area operator obtained in Loop Quantum Gravity (LQG) and based on spin networks. The Planck area is the quantum of minimal area [12] . This deserves further investigation. Modified uncertainty re- lations also apply to the energy and time variables 
Symplectic geometry is the realm of phase spaces [13] where the symplectic form 

To conclude, we may add that non-geometric fluxes in string theory give rise to noncommutative/nonassociative structures. More recently, the differential geometry on the simplest nonassociative (phase) space arising for a constant non-geometric R-flux has been analyzed in [17] . This nonassociativity for a constant R-flux background in closed strings is captured by the commutation relations

Acknowledgements
We thank M. Bowers for very kind assistance.
Cite this paper
Castro, C. (2016) Generalized Uncertainty Relations, Curved Phase-Spaces and Quantum Gravity. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics, 4, 1870-1878. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jamp.2016.410189
References
- 1. Castro, C. Solutions to the Gravitational Field Equations in Curved Phase-Spaces. vixra.org: 1603.0164 (to appear in the Electronic Journal of Theoretical Physics 2006).
- 2. Born, M. (1938) A Suggestion for Unifying Quantum Theory and Relativity. Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 165, 291-303.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1938.0060
Born, M. (1949) Reciprocity Theory of Elementary Particles. Reviews of Modern Physics, 21, 463.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.21.463 - 3. Amelino-Camelia, G., Freidel, L., Kowalski-Glikman, J. and Smolin, L. (2011) The Principle of Relative Locality. Physical Review D, 84, 084010.
Amelino-Camelia, G., Freidel, L., Kowalski-Glikman, J. and Smolin, L. (2011) Relative Locality: A Deepening of the Relativity Principle. General Relativity and Gravitation, 43, 2547-2553.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10714-011-1212-8 - 4. Barcaroli, L., Brunkhorst, L., Gubitosi, G., Loret, N. and Pfeifer, C. Hamilton Geometry: Phase Space Geometry from Modified Dispersion Relations. arXiv : 1507.00922.
- 5. Kempf, A. and Mangano, G. (1997) Minimal Length Uncertainty Relation and Ultraviolet Regularization. Physical Review D, 55, 7909.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.55.7909 - 6. Gross, D. and Mende, P. (1987) The High-Energy Behavior of String Scattering Amplitudes. Physics Letters B, 197, 129-134.
Gross, D. and Mende, P. (1988) String Theory beyond the Planck Scale. Nuclear Physics B, 303, 407-454.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(88)90390-2 - 7. Nottale, L. and Nottale, L. (2011) Scale Relativity And Fractal Space-Time: A New Approach to Unifying Relativity and Quantum Mechanics. World Scientific Publishing Company, Singapore.
Nottale, L. (1993) Fractal Space-Time and Microphysics. World Scientific, Singapore.
Scale Relativity.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laurent-Nottale - 8. Castro, C. (2014) On Clifford Space Relativity, Black Hole Entropy, Rainbow Metrics, Generalized Dispersion and Uncertainty Relations. Foundations of Physics, 44, 990-1008.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10701-014-9825-x - 9. Jarvis, P. and Morgan, S. Born Reciprocity and the Granularity of Spacetime., arXiv: math-ph/0508041.
- 10. Castro, C. (2008) On Born’s Deformed Reciprocal Complex Gravitational Theory and Noncommutative Gravity. Physics Letters B, 668, 442-446.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2008.08.066 - 11. Yang, C. (1947) On Quantized Space-Time. Physical Review, 72, 874.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.72.874 - 12. Rovelli, C. (2004) Quantum Gravity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Thiemann, T. (2007) Introduction to Modern Canonical Quantum General Relativity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. - 13. Slawianowski, J.J. (1990) Geometry of Phase Spaces. John Wiley and Sons, Boston.
- 14. Fedosov, B. (1994) A Simple Geometrical Construction of Deformation Quantization, J. Diff. Geom., 40, 213-238.
Fedosov, B. (1996) Deformation Quantization and index Theory. Academie Verlag, Berlin. - 15. Miron, R., Hrimiuc, D., Shimada, H. and Sabau, S. (2001) The Geometry of Hamilton and Lagrange Spaces. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Boston.
Miron, R. Lagrangian and Hamiltonian Geometries. Applications to Analytical Mechanics, arXiv: 1203.4101 [math.DG].
Vacaru, S., Stavrinos, P., Gaburov, E. and Gonta, D. (2006) Clifford and Riemann-Finsler Structures in Geometric Mechanics and Gravity. Geometry Balkan Press, Athens. - 16. Vacaru, S. (2007) Generalized Lagrange Transforms: Finsler Geometry Methods and Deformation Quantization of Gravity. An. St. Univ. Al. I. Cuza din Iasi (S.N.), Matematica, LIII, 327-342.
- 17. Blumenhagen, R. and Fuchs, M. Towards a Theory of Nonassociative Gravity, arXiv: 1604.03253.
Barnes, G., Schenkel, A. and Szabo, R. Working with Nonassociative Geometry and Field Theory. arXiv : 1602.07353.




