Journal of Cosmetics, Dermatological Sciences and Applications
Vol.07 No.04(2017), Article ID:80902,6 pages

Contribution of Dermatopathology in the Diagnosis of Cutaneous Diseases in Côte d’Ivoire

Kouadio Célestin Ahogo1, Kouame Kanga1, Ange Sylvain Allou1, Sylvanus Koui2, Bitti Adé Odo2

1Department of Dermatology CHU of Treichville, Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire

2Department of Histopathology CHU of Treichville, Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire

Copyright © 2017 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY 4.0).

Received: September 20, 2017; Accepted: December 4, 2017; Published: December 7, 2017


Introduction: Dermatopathology is a fundamental complementary examination for the diagnosis of certain skin conditions when the clinic is hesitant. We therefore initiated this work in order to determine the contribution of dermatopathology in the diagnostic management of certain dermatoses at the Treichville University Hospital Centre of Abidjan. Material and methods: This is a cross-sectional descriptive study with data collection from medical records in the dermatology-venereology and pathological anatomy departments of the Treichville University Hospital Centre. Results: We included and analyzed 184 patients with a sex ratio of 1.2. 46.2% of lesions were generalized with 2% mucosal localization. Erythematosquamous lesions (24.45%) and papules (22.82%) were the most biopsied lesions. The single biopsy sample accounted for 71.2% of the cases and the lesion size ranged from 0.5 cm to 10 cm. Biopsy parts of the lesion alone accounted for 65.2% versus 34.8% for those straddling healthy skin and lesion. Histological diagnosis was established in 91.3%. Kaposi disease accounted for 14.9% of cases followed by psoriasis 11.3%. In the case of three diagnostic hypotheses, the concordance was 84.8%. It was 76.6% for two hypotheses mentioned and 52.3% for a single hypothesis. Conclusion: This work shows that in more than half of the cases, the clinical hypotheses and the histological diagnosis match. It suggests however to continue the training of dermatologists to improve the skin biopsies and invites to initiate clinicopathological confrontations to better refine the diagnoses.


Dermatosis, Histopathology, Biopsy

1. Introduction

The dermatologist still retains the privilege of often being able to make a diagnosis without having to resort to numerous paraclinical examinations. Indeed, many dermatoses do not raise a diagnostic problem. But when the clinic is hesitant, the pathological examination remains a fundamental supplementary examination for the diagnosis of certain skin disorders [1] . However, despite the accessibility of the skin, making biopsy specimens easy, the prescription of pathological examination still seems hesitant in the daily practice of many dermatologists in Abidjan. While skin diseases are among the leading causes of morbidity in Africa and developing countries with a rate around 30% [2] . That’s why it has been thought appropriate to conduct this study in order to help improve diagnostic management of dermatoses by anatomo-pathological examination in Côte d’Ivoire.

2. Material and Methods

We carried out a descriptive and analytical cross-sectional study over a period of 15 months from January 2016 to March 2017. The study concerned all the patients seen at the dermatology centre, who had undergone a skin biopsy with pathological analysis performed at the Department of Pathology at Treichville University Hospital Centre. Patients of any sex and age with histopathological evidence of their dermatosis have been included in this study. We provided detailed information about this study to all subjects and obtained their consent to participation. Data from the study were collected on a survey card that included socio-demographic characteristics, clinical and histological data.

The data was entered and analyzed on a computer using Microsoft® Excel® 2010 software version 14.0.4760.1000. As for the analysis of the data, it was made using the software Epi Info 6.4d.

3. Results

3.1. Study Limitations

During our study we were confronted with several difficulties. The lack of a pathological examinations register in the dermatology center made some files unavailable for studies.

The epidemiological elements were not always reported and the clinical aspects of certain diseases were not well described. Some histopathological diagnoses were imprecise and there was no anatomo-clinical confrontation.

3.2. Epidemio-Clinical Aspects

184 patients were included in the study with a sex ratio of 1.2 in favour of men. Patients’ ages ranged from 1 to 93 years with an average of 42.4 years. 111 patients (60.3%) patients were between 15 and 49 years of age.

Erythematosquamous lesions (24.45%) and papules (22.82%) were the most biopsied lesions (Table 1). The duration of the pathology ranged from 10 days to

Table 1. Distribution by type of lesion.

10 years with an average of 258.8 days. More than 1/4 of the patients had a lesion evolving for more than a year. Cutaneous lesions were generalized in 46.2% of cases. The biopsy site was the lower limb (52.5%), upper limb (31.3%), head and neck (22.2%), trunk (13.1%) and oral mucosa (2%).

3.3. Anatomopathological Aspects

In 71.2% of cases the biopsy was unique. 24.5% of patients received 2 biopsies and 4.3% had 3 biopsies. The size of the lesions varied from 0.5 cm to 10 cm. with an average of 1.58 cm ± 0.98. In about 3/4 of the cases, the sample size ranged from 1 - 2 cm. The biopsy part consisted solely of the lesion in 65.2%. It was straddling the healthy skin and lesion in 34.8% of the cases. In 96.2 of the cases the cutaneous biopsies reached the hypodermis.

3.4. Concordance between Histological and Clinical Diagnosis

Of the 184 biopsy samples received, the histological diagnosis was established in 168 cases. It is around 91.3%. In 8.7% of cases, no exact diagnosis could be established by the anatomopathologist. Kaposi’s disease (14.9%) (Figure 1) and psoriasis (11.3%) (Figure 2) were the well-documented histological findings (Table 2). The overall agreement between clinical diagnostic hypotheses and histopathological findings was 72.8%. It was 84.8% in the case of three diagnostic hypotheses; of 76.6% for two hypotheses mentioned and 52.3% if a single diagnostic hypothesis was evoked by the clinician (Table 3).

4. Discussion

In 15 months, only 184 cutaneous biopsies with pathological examination were performed, with an average of 13 biopsies per month. This result could be explained by the non-systematic use of cutaneous biopsy by Ivorian dermatologists and by the unreliability of anatomopathological findings. In fact, cases of discordance between clinical diagnosis and histopathology are fairly frequent in dermatological practice today, especially concerning inflammatory pathologies [3] . A study carried out in the sub-region also highlighted this fact. Indeed

Table 2. Distribution according to the ten most frequent histological diagnoses.

Table 3. Distribution according to the anatomo-clinical agreement.

Figure 1. Clinical and histopathological (×40) aspect of Kaposi disease Image magnification (×40).

For most dermatologists the clinical diagnosis was sufficiently reliable with regard to the lesions, and did not require histological confirmation [4] many dermatologists are also not satisfied with the anatomo-clinical results often rendered. In 60.3% of these cases, the age group was between 15 and 49 years of age. This result is only a reflection of the demographic profile of our young population.

Erythematosquamous and papular lesions were the most biopsied lesions. This could be explained, on the one hand, by the influence of the frequency of

Figure 2. Clinical and histopathological aspect of psoriasis Image magnification (×10).

Kaposi’s disease and psoriasis. In fact, psoriasis is a chronic pathology of difficult management whose histological proof is often necessary and Kaposi disease is an opportunistic disease in the course of HIV infection and [5] [6] .

The average duration of dermatoses was 2 years. This long delay could be explained in our context by the financial and geographical inaccessibility to quality care, occult beliefs and self-medication by applying poultices. All this often leads to a modification of the clinical lesions, sometimes causing histopathological diagnostic errors.

According to the literature, the average size required for a good quality cutaneous biopsy is 1.5 to 2 centimetres of large diameter [7] . In our series, 8.7% of pathological examinations were without accurate histological diagnosis. This situation could be favoured on the one hand by the inadequacy of cutaneous histopathologists and on the other hand by the quality of the biopsy and the lack of clinical information. In fact, the information contained in the examination request form plays a predominant role in the histological diagnosis; in addition to the age and sex of the patient, the location of the sample, the accompanying symptoms, the triggers, and the treatments undertaken must be mentioned [8] .

In our series, 72.8% of the results of pathological examination were in agreement with one of the diagnostic hypotheses formulated by the clinician. The proportion of discordant diagnoses was 28.3%. Our results therefore highlight the relative quality of the anatomopathological findings and invite clinicians to perform cutaneous biopsies with demand for anatomopathological results in case of diagnostic doubt. A second or even a third biopsy followed by an anatomo-clinical confrontation is recommended in a situation of persistent discordance [9] .

5. Conclusion

This work shows that in more than half of the cases the clinical hypotheses and the histological diagnosis match. It also suggests to reinforce the skills of dermatologists for the realization of cutaneous biopsies and invites to initiate clinicopathological confrontations to better refine the diagnosis.

Conflict of Interest


Financial Support


Cite this paper

Ahogo, K.C., Kanga, K., Allou, A.S., Koui, S. and Odo, B.A. (2017) Contribution of Dermatopathology in the Diagnosis of Cutaneous Diseases in Côte d’Ivoire. Journal of Cosmetics, Dermatological Sciences and Applications, 7, 318-323.


  1. 1. Bruno, P. (2003) Cutaneous Biopsy and Dermatological Pathology for Clinicians. Forum Med, Switzerland, 240-251.

  2. 2. Bissek, A.C., Tabah, E.N., Kouotou, E., Sini, V., Yepnjio, F.N., Nditanchou, R., et al. (2012) The Specter of Skin Diseases in a Rural Setting in Cameroon (Sub-Saharan Africa). BMC Dermatology, 12, 71-75.

  3. 3. Gimbel, D.C. and Legesse, T.B. (2013) Dermatopathology Practice in Ethiopia. Archives of Pathology, 137-139.

  4. 4. Barro-Traore, F., Traore, A., Konate, I., Traore, S., Sawadogo, N.O., Sanou, I., et al. (2003) Mucocutaneous Tumors: Epidemiological Aspects in the Department of Dermatology of the Yalgado Ouédraogo. Cahiers d’études et de recherche Francophone, Health, 13, 101-104.

  5. 5. Konsegré, V. (2010) Contribution of Cutaneous Histology in the Management of Dermatological Diseases in Ouagadougou. PhD Thesis in Medicine, Number 017, University of Ouagadougou, Ouagadougou.

  6. 6. Pitche, P.T., Kombate, K., Owono, F. and Tchangai-Walla, K. (2007) Kaposi’s Sarcoma in a Hospital Setting in Lome (Togo): A Study of 93 Cases. International Journal of Dermatology, 1, 42-44.

  7. 7. Eltoum, L., Fredenburgh, J., Myers, R.B. and Grizzle, W.E. (2001) Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Fixation of Tissue. Histotechnology, 24, 173-190.

  8. 8. Rapini, R.P. (1994) Obtaining a Skin Biopsy Specimen and Interpreting the Results. Dermatologic Clinics, 12, 83-91.

  9. 9. Balde, H. (2003) Evaluation of Small Interventions at the Dermatology Center of Treichville University Hospital Abidjan, CI. Memphis Dermatology, 907 p.