Vol.2, No.9, 990-997 (2010) Natural Science
http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ns.2010.29121
Copyright © 2010 SciRes. OPEN ACCESS
Phylogeny of the Order Bacillales inferred from
3’ 16S rDNA and 5’ 16S-23S ITS nucleotide sequences
Sabarimatou Yakoubou1,2, Dong Xu1, Jean-Charles Côté1*
1Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Research Centre, Gouin Blvd, St-Jean-sur-Richelieu, Canada; *Corresponding Author:
Jean-Charles.Cote@agr.gc.ca
2Département des Sciences Biologiques, Université du Québec à Montréal, Succ.“Centre-Ville” Montréal, Canada
Received 16 April 2010; revised 20 May 2010; accepted 25 May 2010.
ABSTRACT
A short 220 bp sequence was used to study the
taxonomic organization of the bacterial Order
Bacillales. The nucleotide sequences of the 3’
end of the 16S rDNA and the 16S-23S Internal
transcribed spacer (ITS) were determined for 32
Bacillales species and strains. The data for 40
additional Bacillales species and strains were
retrieved directly from Genbank. Together, these
72 Bacillales species and strains encompassed
eight families and 21 genera. The 220 bp se-
quence used here covers a conserved 150 bp
sequence located at the 3’ end of the 16S rDNA
and a conserved 70 bp sequence located at the
5’ end of the 16S-23S ITS. A neighbor-joining
phylogenetic tree was inferred from compara-
tive analyses of all 72 nucleotide sequences.
Eight major Groups were revealed. Each Group
was sub-divided into sub-groups and branches.
In general, the neighbor-joining tree presented
here is in agreement with the currently accepted
phylogeny of the Order Bacillales based on
phenotypic and genotypic data. The use of this
220 bp sequence for phylogenetic analyses
presents several advantages over the use of the
entire 16S rRNA genes or the generation of ex-
tensive phenotypic and genotypic data. This 220
bp sequence contains 150 bp at the 3’ end of the
16S rDNA which allows discrimination among
distantly related species and 70 bp at the 5’ end
of the 16S-23S ITS which, owing to its higher
percentage of nucleotide sequence divergence,
adds discriminating power among closely re-
lated species from same genus and closely re-
lated genera from same family. The method is
simple, rapid, suited to large screening pro-
grams and easily accessible to most laborato-
ries.
Keywords: Bacillales; 16S rDNA; 16S-23S ITS;
Phylogeny
1. INTRODUCTION
In the 1st Edition of Bergey’s Manual of Systematic
Bacteriology (1986), the genus Bacillus, a member of
the Class Bacilli, encompassed the Gram-positive, rod-
shaped, endospore-forming, either obligate or facultative
aerobe bacteria [1]. A total of 34 species and 26 addi-
tional species incertae sedis were described. The genus
was highly heterogeneous, exhibiting a wide range of
nutritional requirements, physiological and metabolic
diversity and DNA base composition. In the following
two decades, numerical classifications [2], 16S rDNA
sequence alignments [3], characterizations at the geno-
typic and phenotypic levels of selected Bacillus species,
all led to the creation of several new genera (briefly re-
viewed in Xu and Côté [4]).
In 2003, we developed a method for the identification,
classification and phylogenetic analyses of Bacillus spe-
cies and species from closely related genera [4]. The
method was simple, rapid, suited to large screening pro-
grammes and easily accessible to most laboratories. In
summary, the method relied on comparisons of a 220 bp
nucleotide sequence marker among Bacillus species.
This 220 bp marker was a combination of a 150 bp se-
quence at the 3’ end of the 16S rRNA gene and a 70 bp
sequence at the 5’ end of the 16S-23S ITS sequence. In
our original study, a total of 40 species was analyzed. We
showed that the phylogeny inferred from the 220 bp
marker was in agreement with then current classifica-
tions based on phenetic and molecular data, with excep-
tions. It revealed species and genera which appeared
misassigned and for which additional characterization
appeared warranted.
In the 2nd Edition of Bergey’s Manual of Systematic
Bacteriology [5], a new taxonomy of the Class Bacilli is
S. Yakoubou et al. / Natural Science 2 (2010) 990-997
Copyright © 2010 SciRes. OPEN ACCESS
991
991
presented. It is the result of phylogenetic and princi-
pal-component analyses of comprehensive datasets of
16S rDNA sequences [5,6]. The Bacillus genus belongs
to the Order Bacillales. The Order Bacillales contains
nine families: Alicyclobacillaceae, Ba cillaceae, Listeri-
aceae, Paenibacillaceae, Pasteuriaceae, Planococcaceae,
Sporolactobacillaceae, Staphylococcaceae and Thermo-
actinomycetaceae. All nine families contain a total of 51
genera.
Today, we further assess the usefulness of the 220 bp
marker by extending its analyses beyond the genus Ba-
cillus, to a higher taxa level, the Order Ba cillales. Wher-
eas our first study focused on species from the genus
Bacillus and species from closely related genera [4], we
report here the phylogenetic analyses of 72 species and
strains from eight Bacillales families and 21 genera.
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
2.1. Bacterial Strains and Culture
Conditions
A total of 72 strains of the Order Bacillales were used in
this study. These encompassed eight families, 21 genera
and 67 species. A total of 31 Bacillales strains were ob-
tained from the “Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorgan-
ismen und Zellkulturen” (DSMZ) GmbH, Braunschweig,
Germany and were grown according to the DSMZ guide-
lines (http://www.dsmz.de/microorganisms/media_list.
php). Jeotgalib acillus alimentarius was obtained from
the “Czech Collection of Microorganisms” (CCM), Ma-
saryk University, Brno, Czech Republic and grown ac-
cording to the CCM guidelines (http://www.sci.muni.
cz/ccm/index.html). The nucleotide sequences of the 40
remaining strains were retrieved directly from GenBank.
All bacterial strains and their sources are listed in Table
1.
Escherichia coli strain TOP10 (Invitrogen Inc., Bur-
lington, ON, Canada) was used for cloning PCR frag-
ments. Strain TOP10 was cultured on Luria-Bertani (LB)
agar plates to select transformants or in LB broth to mul-
tiply the cells, with shaking at 180-200 rpm at 37, 1 h.
2.2. DNA Extraction
Bacterial cells were washed with TESS buffer [10 mM
Tris/HCl (pH 8.0), 1 mM Na2EDTA, 0.1 M NaCl and
0.1% Sarkosyl (N-lauroylsarcosine)] and resuspended in
TE buffer [10 mM Tris/HCl (pH 8.0), 1 mM Na2EDTA].
Cells were lysed with 10 mg/ml lysozyme and 0.1% SDS.
The subsequent phenol/chloroform extractions and etha-
nol precipitation were carried out as described by Sam-
brook and Russel [7].
Recombinant plasmid from E. coli strain TOP10 was
isolated using the alkaline-lysis method [8] with some
modifications as described elsewhere [4].
2.3. Amplification of the 3’ End 16S rDNA
and the 16S-23S ITS Region
A pair of primers: L516SF (5’-TCGCTAGTAATCGCGG
ATCAGC-3’) and L523SR (5’-GCATATCGGTGTTAG
TCCCGTCC-3’), Reference [4] was used for the ampli-
fication of the 3’ end of 16S rDNA, the 16S-23S ITS
region and the 5’ end of 23S rDNA. Amplification was
performed in a Thermal Cycler 9600 (Perkin Elmer,
Waltham, MA, USA) and the reaction mixtures contained
50 ng template DNA, 0.25 µM each primer, 200 µM
dNTP, 1.5 mM MgCl2 and 1.25 U Taq DNA polymerase
(QIAGEN Inc. Mississauga, ON, Canada) in a final
volume of 50 µl. PCR was performed under the follow-
ing conditions: 45 s at 95 and then 30 cycles of 15 s at
94, 30 s at 53 and 90 s at 72. Amplification
products were visualized on agarose gels.
2.4. Cloning and Sequencing Methods
The amplified DNAs were cloned into a pCRII-TOPO
cloning vector using the TOPO TA cloning kit (Invitro-
gen, Inc.), following the manufacturer’s instructions.
Escherichia coli strain TOP10 transformants were se-
lected on LB agar plates containing kanamycin (50 µg/ml),
5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-beta-D-galacto-pyranoside
(X-Gal) (40 µg/ml). Multiple clones were submitted for
futher analyses for each Bacillales species. The recom-
binant plasmids were isolated using the modified alka-
line-lysis method, digested with EcoRI and visualized on
agarose gels to confirm the presence of an inserted frag-
ment.
The nucleotide sequences of cloned fragments were
determined by the dideoxynucleotide chain termination
method [9], using a capillary array automated DNA se-
quencer (ABI 3730xl DNA analyzer; Applied Biosys-
tems, Foster City, CA, USA). The sequences of both
strands were determined.
2.5. Sequence Analysis
The 3’ end of the 16S rDNA and the 16S-23S ITS of the
32 Bacillales species and strains sequenced in this study
were used for analysis. Forty sequences publicly avail-
able from GenBank were added for comparison purposes
to cover a wider range of Bacillales families and genera,
for a total of 72 Bacillales species and strains. A
neighbor-joining tree was constructed [10] based on the
alignment of the 72 3’ end of the 16S rDNA and the 5’
end of the 16S-23S ITS sequences.
The tree was bootstrapped using 1,000 random sam-
ples of sites from the alignment, all using CLUSTAL W
software [11] at the DNA Data Bank of Japan (DDBJ)
(http://clustalw.ddbj.nig.ac.jp/top- e.html), with the Ki-
S. Yakoubou et al. / Natural Science 2 (2010) 990-997
Copyright © 2010 SciRes. OPEN ACCESS
992
Table 1. Bacillale families, genera, species and strains used to construct the bootstrapped neighbor-joining tree inferred from the 220
bp sequence, and shown in Figure 3.
Families, genera and species Source/Strain GenBank accession no.
This study* Retrieved** Groups Sub-groups
Alicyclobacillaceae
Alicyclobacillus
acidocaldarius subsp.acidocaldarius
acidocaldarius subsp. rittmannii
acidoterrestris
cycloheptanicus
herbarius
hesperidum
DSM 446
DSM 11297
DSM 3922
DSM 4006
DSM 13609
DSM 12489
EU723605
EU723607
EU723608
EU723610
EU723613
EU723615
V
V
V
V
Ungrouped
V
Bacillaceae
Amphibacillus
fermentum
tropicus
xylanus
Anoxybacillus
flavithermus
Bacillus
clausii
subtilis
thuringiensis
thuringiensis var. konkukian
weihenstephanensis
Filobacillus
milensis
Geobacillus
caldoxylosilyticus
kaustophilus
kaustophilus
stearothermophilus
subterraneus
thermocatenulatus
thermodenitrificans
thermodenitrificans
thermoglucosidasius
thermoleovorans
uzenensis
Gracilibacillus
dipsosauri
halotolerans
Halobacillus
sp.
Oceanobacillus
iheyensis
Virgibacillus
marismortui
pantothenticus
proomii
salexigens
DSM 13869
DSM 13870
DSM 6626
WK1
168
Al Hakam
97-27
KBAB4
DSM 13259
DSM 12041
HTA426
DSM 7263
DSM 22
DSM 13552
DSM 730
NG80-2
DSM 465
DSM 2542
DSM 5366
DSM 13551
DSM 11125
DSM 11805
SA-Hb6
HTE831
DSM 12325
DSM 26
DSM 13055
DSM 11483
EU723600
EU723602
EU723603
EU723621
EU723625
EU723629
EU723631
EU723636
EU723638
EU723643
EU723644
EU723648
EU723651
EU723655
EU723657
EU723664
EU723672
EU723675
EU723666
CP000922
AP006627
AL009126
CP000485
AE017355
CP000903
BA000043
CP000557
AB367166
BA000028
VIII Ungrouped
VIII iii
VIII iii
VIII Ungrouped
VI i
VI i
VI ii
VI ii
VI ii
Ungrouped
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
VIII
VIII ii
VIII i
VIII i
VIII ii
VIII ii
VIII ii
VIII ii
Listeriaceae
Listeria
inoccua
monocytogenes
elshimeri
Clip11262
EGD-e
SLCC5334
AL592022
AL591824
AM263198
VI iii
VI iii
VI iii
Paenibacillaceae
Aneurinibacillus
aneurinilyticus
migulanus
thermoaerophilus
Brevibacillus
agri
borstelensis
brevis
DSM 5562
DSM 2895
DSM 10154
ATCC 51360
ATCC 51668
ATCC8246
EU723616
EU723617
EU723618
AF478091
AF478093
AY478094
III i
III i
III i
III ii
III ii
III ii
S. Yakoubou et al. / Natural Science 2 (2010) 990-997
Copyright © 2010 SciRes. OPEN ACCESS
993
993
Table 1. Continued.
Families, genera and species Source/Strain GenBank accession no.
This study* Retrieved** Groups Sub-groups
brevis
chosinensis
parabrevis
formosus
Paenibacillaceae
Paenibacillus
alginolyticus
alvei
chondroitinus
larvae
lautus
lentimorbus
macerans
pabuli
popilliae
sp
validus
NBRC10059
ATCC 51359
ATCC 8186
ATCC51669
ATCC 51185
ATCC 6344
ATCC 51184
ATCC 9545
ATCC 43898
ATCC 8244
ATCC 43899
ATCC 14707
KLN 3
JDR-2
ATCC 43897
AP008955
AF478095
AF478097
AF478096
AF478104
AF478098
AF478105
AF487106
AF487100
AY763503
AF478101
AF478102
CP001656
DQ062684
AF478103
III ii
III ii
III ii
III ii
IV
IV
IV
IV
IV
IV
IV
IV
IV
IV
IV
Pasteuriaceae
Pasteuria
ramosa
penetrans
P5
CJ-1
AY762091
AY123968
II
II
Planococcaceae
Jeotgalibacillus
alimentarius
Marinibacillus
marinus
Ureibacillus
terrenus
thermosphaericus
CCM 7134
DSM 1297
DSM 12654
DSM 10633
EU723660
EU723661
EU723667
EU723670
VI
VI
VI iv
VI iv
Sporolactobacillaceae
Sporolactobacillus
terrae
M-116
D16289.1
Ungrouped
Staphylococcaceae
Staphylococcus
aureus
arnosus
epidermidis
haemolyticus
aprophyticus
Macrococcus
caseolyticus
RF122
TM300
RP62A
JCSC1435
ATCC 15305
JCSC5402
AJ938182
AM295250
CP000029
AP006716
AP008934
AP009484
VII
VII
VII
VII
VII
VII
*Sequences generated in this study; **Sequences publicly available in GenBank at the onset of this work and retrieved directly.
mura’s parameter method [12]. The neighbor-joining
phylogenetic tree was drawn using TreeView (version
1.6.6) [13,14].
3. RESULTS
Two primers, one located about 200 nt upstream from
the 3’ end of the 16S rRNA gene, the other about 80 nt
downstream from the 5’ end of the 23S rRNA gene (Fig-
ure 1), were used to amplify the last 200 bp of the 16S
rRNA gene and the entire 16S-23S Internal transcribed
spacer (ITS) region from 32 Bacillales species and
strains (Table 1). The amplicons ranged in length from
450 to 1,200 bp. The number of amplicons per strain
ranged from 1 to 6. A subset of these results is shown in
Figure 2. Each amplicon was cloned and its nucleotide
sequence determined. The homologous DNA sequences
from 40 more Bacillales species and strains were re-
trieved directly from GenBank and added in the study
(Table 1). Together, these 72 Bacillales species and
strains belong to eight Bacillales families and 21 genera.
The last 150 bp located at the 3’ end of 16S rDNA and
the first 70 bp located at the 5’ end of 16S-23S ITS, were
combined into a 220 bp sequence. A multiple alignment
of these nucleotide sequences from the 72 Bacillale spe-
cies and strains was performed (supplementary data) and
a bootstrapped neighbor-joining tree was constructed
(Figure 3).
S. Yakoubou et al. / Natural Science 2 (2010) 990-997
Copyright © 2010 SciRes. OPEN ACCESS
994
L516SF
L523SR
5’ 3’
16SrRNAgene
ab
\\
23SrRNAgene
ITS
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the 16S and 23S rRNA
genes separated by an Internal transcribed spacer (ITS). Orien-
tations and positions of the primers used for amplification,
L516SF and L523SR, are shown. The contiguous small grey
and black boxes, indicated by the letters “a” and “b” corre-
spond to the last 150 bp at the 3’ end of the 16S rRNA gene
and the first 70 bp at the 5’ end of the ITS, respectively. To-
gether, these boxes correspond to the 220 bp marker used in
this study.
bp
800 —
100 —
1600 —
M1234 56 7891011
Figure 2. Agarose gel electrophoresis of the amplification
products in selected species in the Order Bacillales using the
L516SF/L523SR primer pair. Lane 1, 100 bp DNA marker;
lane 2, Alicyclobacillus acidocaldarius subsp. acidocaldarius;
lane 3, Alicyclobacillus herbarius; lane 4, Geobacillus uzenen-
sis; lane 5, Gracilibacillus halodurans; lane 6, Geobacillus
kaustophilus; lane 7, Amphibacillus tropicus; lane 8, Virgiba-
cillus proomii; lane 9, Virgibacillus salexigens; lane 10,
Marinibacillus marinus; lane 11, Aneurinibacillus aneur-
inilyticus ; lane 12, Filobacillus milensis.
At first sight, eight major Groups are revealed at the
80% nucleotide sequence identities, Group I to VIII.
Group I contains all eleven Geobacillus species and
strains. Alicyclobacillus herbarius forms a single branch
between Groups I and II. Group II contains both Pasteu-
riaceae species. Group III contains ten species and
strains from two genera of the Paenibacillaceae family.
Two sub-groups can be revealed. Sub-group i encom-
passes the three Aneurinibacillus species. They share at
least 82% nucleotide sequence identities. Sub-group ii
encompasses the seven Brevibacillu s species and strains.
They share at least 80% nucleotide sequence identities.
Group IV contains all 11 Paeniba cillus species. Group V
contains five of the six species and strains in the Alicy-
clobacillaceae family. Alicyclobacillus herbarius is the
sixth species, and forms a single branch as explained
above, because it shares less than 80% nucleotide se-
quence identities with members of Group V. Group VI is
more heterogenous. It contains 12 species and strains
from five genera from three families: the Planococca-
ceae, Bacillaceae and Listeriaceae. Four sub-groups and
two branches are revealed. Jeotgalibacillus alimentarus
forms the first branch of Group VI, and belongs to the
Planococcaceae family. Sub-group i contains two Ba-
cillus species of the Bacillaceae family, B. clausii and B.
subtilis. Marinibacillus marinus forms the second branch
of Group VI. It is the second genus of the Planococca-
ceae family. Sub-group ii contains three highly related
Bacillus species and strains, the two B. thuringiensis
strains and B. weihenstephanensis. Sub-group iii con-
tains all three Listeria species of the Listeriaceae family.
Sub-group iv contains both species of the third Plano-
coccaceae genus, Ureiba cillus. Next, a branch is formed
by Sporolactobacillus terrae. This genus is the only one
known in the Sporolactobacillaceae family. This is fol-
lowed by a branch formed by Filobacillus milensis, a
member of the Bacilla ceae family. Group VII contains
five Staphylococcus and one Macrococcus species. Both
genera belong to the Staphylococcaceae family. Group
VIII contains 12 species from six genera, all in the Ba-
cillaceae family. Three subgroups and thee branches can
be revealed. Sub-group i contains Oceanobacillus and
Halobacillus. They share 87% nucleotide sequence iden-
tities. The grouping of Oceanobacillus and Ha lobacillus
species in sub-group i is in agreement with the work of
Lu et al., properties, and genetic data [15]. Sub-group ii
contains five species from two genera. It can be further
divided into two clusters. The first one contains Virgiba-
cillus (V.) pantothenticus, V. proomii and Gracilibacillus
halotolerans, the second cluster contains V. marismortui
and V. salexigens. The subdivision of all four Virgibacil-
lus species into two sub-groups is in agreement with the
work of Heyrman et al., based on genetic, chemotax-
onomic and phenotypic data [16]. Sub-group iii contains
two of the three Amphibacillus (Am.) species, Am. xy-
lanus and Am. tropicus. Group VIII is completed by
three branches: Gracilibacillus dipsosauri, Anoxybacil-
lus flavithermus and Amphiba cillus fermentum. All
members of Group VIII are halophilic and alkaliphilic
bacilli. This grouping is in agreement with the one pro-
posed by Zhilina et al., based on physiology and genetic
data [17].
When each of the eight major Groups of this neighbor-
joining tree are analyzed separately, strains from same
species, species from same genus and genera from same
family are grouped together. Each Group corresponds to
a single Bacillales family, exclusive of other families,
with one exception, Group VI which contains three fami-
S. Yakoubou et al. / Natural Science 2 (2010) 990-997
Copyright © 2010 SciRes. OPEN ACCESS
995
995
Anoxybacillus flavithermus
Amphibacillus fermentum
Gracilibacillus dipsosauri
Virgibacillus pantothenticus
Virgibacillusproomii
Gracilibacillus halotolerans
Virgibacillus marismortui
Virgibacillus salexigens
93
Geobacillus thermodenitrificans NG80-2
Geobacillus kaustophilus
Geobacillus thermoleovorans
Geobacillus kaustophilus HTA426
96
71
Geobacillus thermodenitrificans
Geobacillus thermotecatenulatus
63
Geobacillus subterraneus
Geobacillus uzenensis
67
53
Geobacillus stearothermophilus
Geobacillus caldoxylosilyticus
Geobacillus thermoglucosidasius
87
51
50
Alicyclobacillus herbarius
Pasteuria ramosa
Pasteuria penetrans
99
63
Aneurinibacillus thermoaerophilus
Aneurinibacillus aneurinilyticus
Aneurinibacillus migulanus
86
Brevibacillus borstelensis
Brevibacillus parabrevis
Brevibacillus agri
Brevibacillus brevis
Brevibacillus formosus
Brevibacillus brevis NBRC100599
Brevibacillus choshinensis
82
78
80
78
86
92
64
Paenibacillus larvae
Paenibacillus macerans
Paenibacillus validus
Paenibacillus sp.
Paenibacillus alvei
Paenibacillus lentimorbus
Paenibacillus popilliae
51
Paenibacillus pabuli
Paenibacillus chondroitinus
Paenibacillus lautus
Paenibacillus alginolyticus
57
79
Alicyclobacillus acidocaldarius acidocaldarius
Alicyclobacillus acidocaldarius rittmannii
98
Alicyclobacillus hesperidum
Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris
Alicyclobacillus cycloheptanicus
99
52
Jeotgalibacillus alimentarius
Bacillus clausii
Bacillus subtilis
Marinibacillus marinus
Bacillus thuringiensis konkukian
Bacillus thuringiensis Al-Hakam
Bacillus weihenstephanensis
93
93
58
Listeria welshimeri
Listeria monocytongenes
Listeria innocua
97
97
Ureibacillus terrenus
Ureibacillus thermosphaericus
61
Sporolactobacillus terrae
Filobacillus milensis
Staphylococcus saprophyticus
Staphylococcus carnosus
Macrococcus caseolyticus
Staphylococcus aureus
Staphylococcus epidermidis
Staphylococcus haemolyticus
60
88
59
Oceanobacillus iheyensis
Halobacillus sp
Amphibacillus xylanus
Amphibacillus tropicus
59
0.01
U ng rouped
Ung rouped
Ungrouped
Ung rouped
Ungrouped
Gro upsSub- Groups
Clusters
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
i
B acillaceae
ii
iii
iv
i
ii
iii
i
ii
P asteuriaceae
B acillaceae
B acillaceae
P lanococcaceae
Listeriace ae
P aenibacillaceae
P aenibacillaceae
Alicy clobacillaceae
B acillaceae
S porolactobacil laceae
S taphyloc occaceae
Families
Figure 3. Bootstrapped neighbor-joining tree of 72 Bacillales species and strains inferred from the align-
ment of the 220 bp marker. Major Groups are indicated in capital roman numerals. Sub-groups are indi-
cated in lower case riman numerals. Bootstrap values higher than 50% are indicated (expressed as per-
centage of 1000 replication). The horizontal bar represents 1% nt difference.
S. Yakoubou et al. / Natural Science 2 (2010) 990-997
Copyright © 2010 SciRes. OPEN ACCESS
996
lies. In some cases, Groups were divided into sub-groups
which corresponded to genera, with one exception, Group
VIII where sub-groups encompassed different genera.
The family Sporolactobacillaceae forms a branch be-
tween Groups VI and VII. Three Bacillales families:
Bacillaceae, Pa enibacilla ceae and Alicyclobacillaceae,
show some level of heterogeneity. Genera of the Bacil-
laceae family are found into three Groups, Groups I, VI
and VIII, and in a branch between Groups VI and VII.
Genera of the Paenibacillaceae family are found into
two Groups, Groups III and IV. Analysis of the Alicy-
clobacillaceae family reveals a different story. Five of
the six species and strains are clustered together in
Group V. The sixth, Alicyclobacillus herbarius, is more
distant. It forms a branch between Groups I and II. This
is in agreement with the work of Goto et al. [18]. Al-
though distinct from all other Alicyclobacillaceae based
on genomic data, including 16S rDNA sequences, Ali-
cyclobacillus herbarius was grouped with the family
based on the presence of ω-cycloheptane fatty acids [18].
4. DISCUSSION
In a 2003 study [4], on Bacillus and closely-related gen-
era, a multiple alignment of the 3’ end of the 16S rRDA
sequence showed that the last 157 nucleotides shared
extensive identities among closely related species from
same genus. This 157 nucleotide sequence, however,
was not conserved among species from different genera.
In the same study, a multiple alignment of the 16S-23S
Internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequence showed that
the first 70 nucleotides were conserved between alleles
of the same strain and between alleles of different strains
from same species. This sequence, however, was not
conserved among alleles of different species of the same
genus. These two sequences, the last 150 bp at the 3’ end
of the 16S rRNA gene and the first 70 bp at the 5’ end of
the 16S-23S rRNA ITS, were combined into a single 220
bp marker. This marker was used to infer the phylogeny
of Bacillus species and species from closely related gen-
era. It could cluster Bacillus species and species from
closely related genera into taxa akin to genera and could
also distinguish closely related species. In this 2003
study, a total of 40 species was analyzed.
In the current study, we further assessed the usefulness
of the 220 bp marker at a higher taxonomic level, the
Order Bacillales. A total of 72 Bacillales species and
strains from eight Bacillales families and 21 genera were
covered. The number of Bacillus species included in this
current study on Bacillales was deliberately kept low
since this genus had already been covered extensively in
our earlier study [4]. The neighbor-joining tree presented
here was compared with the revised road map of the
Order Bacillales shown in the 2nd Edition of Bergey’s
Manual of Systematic Bacteriology [5]. This revised
road map [5] is a consensus phylogenetic tree of the Or-
der Bacillales. It is the consensus tree inferred from nu-
merous phylogenetic and principal-component analyses
of comprehensive datasets of 16S rDNA sequences [5,6].
Our phylogenetic tree presented here is in agreement
with the currently accepted phylogeny of the Order Ba-
cillales, based on phenotypic and genotypic data. It is, in
general, in agreement with the revised road map of the
Order Bacillales [5]. In addition, some bacterial species
that were not grouped at the genus level in our neighbor-
joining tree, exemplified by Alicyclobacillus herbarius,
were also confirmed by others to be different based on
phenotypic and genotypic data [18].
The main discrepancy between our results, obtained
with the 220 bp marker, and the revised road map shown
in the 2nd Edition of Bergey’s Manual of Systematic
Bacteriology [5], rests on the grouping of the Bacilla-
ceae family. In our study, members of the Bacillaceae
family are present in three of the eight Groups. In the
revised road map [5], two major Bacillaceae groups are
presented. It is recognized, however, that some species
have been misassigned to the Bacillaceae family [5].
The revised road map is constructed based on 16S rDNA
sequences [5]. Our 220 bp marker contains 150 bp from
16S rDNA and 70 bp from ITS. Owing to its higher rate
of nucleotide substitutions, this 70 bp adds discriminat-
ing power among species from same genera and genera
from same family. As indicated by Ludwig et al. [5], and
as shown here, the reorganization of the Bacillaceae
family is still a work in progress.
The use of this 220 bp marker presents several advan-
tages over the use of the entire 16S rRNA gene or the
generation of extensive phenotypic and genotypic data in
phylogenetic analyses. As shown in an earlier study [4],
the method is simple, rapid, suited to large screening
programmes and easily accessible to most laboratories.
We have shown here that it can group Bacillales families
and genera in accordance with established phylogenies.
Because the 220 bp marker shows a higher percentage of
nucleotide sequence divergence than the 16S rRNA gene,
it can better discriminate among closely related Ba-
cillales species. It can also reveal Bacillales species
which may appear misassigned and for which additional
characterization appear warranted.
In conclusion, in an earlier study [4], a 220 bp marker,
based on 3’ end of 16S rRDA and 5’ end of 16S-23S
rRNA ITS, was developed and used to classify species in
the Ba cillus genus and in closely related genera. Here,
we showed that this 220 bp marker could be used to re-
construct the phylogeny at a higher taxa level: the Order
Bacillales. We are planning to follow-up this work by
S. Yakoubou et al. / Natural Science 2 (2010) 990-997
Copyright © 2010 SciRes. OPEN ACCESS
997
997
assessing the resolving power of this marker in recon-
structing the phylogeny at a lower taxa level: the Bacil-
lus cereus group, sensu lato.
Recently, in parallel, a similar maker was tested and
shown to be able to reconstruct the phylogeny of the
Class γ-proteobacteria [19].
REFERENCES
[1] Claus, D. and Berkeley, R.C.W. (1986) Genus Bacillus
Cohn, 1872. In: Sneath, P.H.A., Mair, N.S., Sharpe, M.E.
and J.G. Holt., Ed., Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bac-
teriology, The Williams & Wilkins Co., Baltimore, 2,
1105-1139.
[2] Priest, F.G., Goodfellow, M. and Todd, C. (1988) A nu-
merical classification of the genus Bacillus. Journal of
General Microbiology, 134(7), 1847-1882.
[3] Ash, C., Farrow, A.E., Wallbanks, S. and Collins, M.D.
(1991) Phylogenetic heterogeneity of the genus Bacillus
revealed by comparative analysis of small-subunit-riboso-
mal RNA sequences. Letters in Applied Microbiology,
13(4), 202-206.
[4] Xu, D. and Côté, J.-C. (2003) Phylogenetic relationships
between Bacillus species and related genera inferred from
comparison of 3’ end 16S rDNA and 5’ end 16S-23S ITS
nucleotide sequences. International Journal of System-
atic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 53, 695-704.
[5] Ludwig, W., Schleifer, K-H. and Whitman, W.B. (2009)
Revised road map to the phylum Firmicutes. In: De Vos,
P., et al. Eds., Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology,
2nd Edition, The Firmicutes, Springer-Verlag, New York,
3, 1-17.
[6] Garrity, G.M., Bell, J.A. and Lilburn, T. (2005) The Re-
vised Road Map to the Manual. In: Brenner, D.J., Krieg,
N.R., Staley, J.T. and Garrity, G.M., Eds., Bergey’s Man-
ual of Systematic Bacteriology, 2nd Edition, The Pro-
teobacteria, Part A, Introductory Essays. Springer, New
York , 2, 159-220.
[7] Sambrook, J. and Russell, D.W. (2001) Molecular Clon-
ing: A Laboratory Manual. 3rd Edition, Cold Spring
Harbor Laboratory Press, N.Y..
[8] Stephen, D., Jones, C. and Schofield, J.P. (1990) A rapid
method for isolating high quality plasmid DNA suitable
for DNA sequencing. Nucleic Acids Research, 18(24),
7463-7464
[9] Sanger, F., Nicklen, S. and Coulson, A.R. (1977) DNA
sequencing with chain-termination inhibitors. Proceed-
ings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 74,
5463-5467.
[10] Saitou, N. and Nei, M. (1987) The neighbor-joining
method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic
trees. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 4(4), 406-425.
[11] Thompson, J.D., Higgins, D.G. and Gibson, T.J. (1994)
CLUSTAL W: Improving the sensitivity of progressive
multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting,
positions-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice.
Nucleic Acids Research, 22(22), 4673-4680.
[12] Kimura, M. (1980) A simple method for estimating evo-
lutionary rate of base substitutions through comparative
studies of nucleotide sequences. Journal of Molecular
Evolution, 16(2), 111-120.
[13] Page, R.D.M. (1996) TreeView: An application to display
phylogenetic trees on personal computers. Computer Ap-
plication in the Biosciences, 12(4), 357-358.
[14] Page, R.D.M. (2000) TreeView—tree drawing software
for Apple Macintosh and Windows.
http://taxonomy.zoology.gla.ac.uk/rod/treeview.html
[15] Lu, J., Nogi, Y. and Takami, H., (2001) Oceanobacillus
iheyensis gen. nov., sp. nov., a deep-sea extremely
halotolerant and alkaliphilic species isolated from a depth
of 1050 m on the Iheya Ridge. FEMS Microbiology Let-
ters, 205(2), 291-297.
[16] Heyrman, J., Logan, N.A., Busse, H.J., Balcaen, A.,
Lebbe, L., et al. (2003) Virgibacillus carmonensis sp.
nov., Virgibacillus necropolis sp. nov. and Virgibacillus
picturae sp. nov., three novel species isolated from dete-
riorated mural paintings, transfer of the species of the
genus Salibacillus to Virgibacillus, as Virgibacillus
marismortui comb. nov. and Virgibacillus salexigens
comb. nov., and emended description of the genus Virgi-
bacillus. International Journal of Systematic and Evolu-
tionary Microbiology, 53, Part 2, 501-511.
[17] Zhilina, T.N., Garnova, E.S., Tourova, T.P., Kostrikina,
N.A. and Zavarzin, G.A., (2001) AmAmphibacillus fer-
mentum sp. nov. and Amphibacillus tropicus sp. nov.,
new alkaliphilic, facultatively anaerobic, saccharolytic
bacilli from Lake Magadi. Mikrobiologiya, in Russian,
70(6), 825-837. English Translation: Microbiology, 70(6),
711-722.
[18] Goto, K., Matsubara, H., Mochida, K., Matsumura, T.,
Hara, Y., et al. (2002) Alicyclobacillus herbarius sp. nov.,
a novel bacterium containing omega-cycloheptane fatty
acids, isolated from herbal tea. International Journal of
Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 52(1), 109-
113.
[19] Yakoubou, S. and Côté, J.-C. (2010) Phylogeny of
γ-proteobacteria inferred from comparisons of 3’ end 16S
rRNA gene and 5’ end 16S-23S ITS nucleotide sequences.
Natural Science, 2(6), 535-543.