Applied Mathematics
Vol.05 No.21(2014), Article ID:52592,11 pages
10.4236/am.2014.521330
Duality for a Control Problem Involving Support Functions
I. Husain1, Abdul Raoof Shah2, Rishi K. Pandey1
1Department of Mathematics, Jaypee University of Engineering and Technology, Guna, India
2Department of Statistics, University of Kashmir, Srinagar, India
Email: ihusain11@yahoo.com
Copyright © 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Received 14 September 2014; revised 12 October 2014; accepted 8 November 2014
ABSTRACT
Mond-Weir type duality for control problem with support functions is investigated under generalized convexity conditions. Special cases are derived. A relationship between our results and those of nonlinear programming problem containing support functions is outlined.
Keywords:
Control Problem, Support Function, Generalize Convexity, Converse Duality, Nonlinear Programming
1. Introduction and Preliminaries
Consider the following control problem containing support functions introduced by Husain et al. [1]
subject to
(1)
(2)
(3)
where
1) is a differentiable state vector function with its derivative
and
is a smooth control vector function.
2) denotes an n-dimensional Euclidean space and
is a real interval.
3),
and
are continuously differentiable.
4) and
,
are the support function of the compact set K and
respectively.
Denote the partial derivatives of f where by ft, fx and ft,
where superscript denote the vector components. Similarly we have ht, hx, hu and gt, gx, gu. X is the space of continuously differentiable state functions. Such that
and
and are equipped with
the norm and U, the space of piecewise continuous control vector functions
having the uniform norm The differential Equation (2) with initial conditions expressed as
may be written as
where
being the space of continuous function from I to Rn defined as
In the derivation of these optimality condition, some constraint qualification to make the equality constraint locally solvable [2] and hence the Fréchét derivative of
(say) with respect to
namely
are required to be surjective. In [1] , Husain et al. derived the following Fritz john type necessary optimality for the existence of optimal solution of (CP).
Proposition 1. (Fritz John Condition): If is an optimal solution of (CP) and the Fréchét derivative Q' is surjective, then there exist Langrange multipliers
and piecewise smooth
,
,
and
such that for all t,
As in [3] , Husain et al. [1] pointed out if the optimal solution for (CP) is normal, then the Fritz john type optimal conditions reduce to the following Karush-Kuhn-Tucker optimal conditions.
Proposition 2. If is an optimal solution and is normal and Q' is surjective, there exist piecewise smooth
with
,
,
and
,
such that
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
Using the Karush-Kuhn-Tucker type optimality condition given in Proposition 2, Husain et al. [1] presented the following Wolfe type dual to the control problem (CP) and proved usual duality theorem under the pseudo-
convexity of for all
, and
,
.
(WCD): Maximize
subject to
We review some well known facts about a support function for easy reference. Let be a compact convex set in
. Then the support function of
denoted by
is defined as
A support function, being convex and everywhere finite, has a subdifferential in the sense of convex analysis, that is, there exists such that
for all x. The subdif-
ferential of is given by
Let
be normal
cone at a point Then
if and only if
or, equivalently,
is in the subdifferential of s at
In order to relax the pseudoconvexity in [1] , Mond-Weir type dual to (CP) is constructed and various duality theorems are derived. Particular cases are deduced and it is also indicated that our results can be considered as the dynamic generalization of the duality results for nonlinear programming problem with support functions.
2. Mond-Weir Type Duality
We propose the following Mond-Weir type dual (M-WCD) to the control problem (CP):
Dual (M-WCD): Maximize
subject to
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
(18)
Theorem 1. (Weak Duality): Assume that
(A1): is feasible for (CP),
(A2): is feasible for the problem (M-WCD),
(A3): for
is pseudoconvex, and
(A4): for all
and
are quasiconvex at
Then
Proof: Since we have
and
Combining these inequalities with (14) and (15) respectively, we have
and
These, because of the hypothesis (A4) yields
(19)
(20)
Combining (19) and (20) and then using (12) and (13), we have
This, due to the pseudoconvexity of for
implies
Since the above inequality gives
yielding
Theorem 2. (Strong Duality): If is an optimal solution of (CP) and is normal, then there exist piecewise smooth
with
and such that
is feasible for (M-WCD) and the corresponding values of (CP) and (M-WCD) are equal. If also, the hypotheses of Theorem 1 hold, then
is optimal solution of the problem (M-WCD).
Proof: Since is an optimal solution of (CP) and is normal, it follows by Proposition 2 that there exist piecewise smooth
and
. satisfying for all
the conditions (4)-(10) are satisfied. The conditions (4)-(6) together with (9) and (10) imply that
is feasible for (M-WCD). Using
we obtain,
The equality of the objective functionals of the problems (CP) and (M-WCD) follows. This along with the hypotheses of Theorem 1, the optimality of for (M-WCD) follows.
The following gives the Mangasarian type strict converse duality theorem:
Theorem 3. (Strict Converse Duality): Assume that
(A1): is an optimality solution of (CP) and is normal;
(A2): is an optimal solution of (M-WCD),
(A3): in strictly is pseudoconvex for all
and
(A4): for all
and
are quasi convex.
Then i.e.
is an optimal solution of (CP).
Proof: Assume that and exhibit a contradiction. Since
is an optimality solution of
(CP). By Theorem 2 there exist with
such that
is an optimal solution of (M-WCD).
Thus
(21)
Since is feasible for (CP) and
for (M-WCD), we have
and
These, because of the hypothesis (A4) imply the merged inequality
This, by using the equality constraints (12) and (13) of (M-WCD) gives
By the hypothesis (A2), this implies
(using (21)). Consequently, we have
Since for
and
for
this yields,
This cannot happen. Hence
3. Converse Duality
The problem (M-WCD) can be written as the follows:
Maximize:
subject to
where
Consider and
as defining a map- pings
and
respectively where
is the space of piecewise smooth
, V is space of piececewise smooth
, Wj is the space of piecewise of smooth Wj,
B1 and B2 are Banach spaces.
and
with
Here some restrictions are required on the equality constraints. For this, it suffices that if the
derivatives
and
have weak * closed range.
Theorem 4. (Converse Duality): Assume that
(A1): and h are twice continuously differentiable.
(A2): is an optimal solution of (CP).
(A3): and
have weak * closed ranges.
(A4): for some
, and
(A5): 1) The gradient vectors and
are linearly independent, or
2) The gradient vectors and
are linearly independent.
(A6):
Proof: Since is an optimal solution of (M-WCD), by Proposition 1 there exists
and
and piecewise smooth functions
,
, such that
(22)
(23)
(24)
(25)
(26)
(27)
(28)
(29)
(30)
(31)
(32)
Multiplying (24) by and summing over i and then integrating using (28), we have
which can be written as,
(33)
Multiplying (25) by and then integrating and using (29), we have
This implies
or
(34)
Using the equality constraints (12) and (13) of the problem (M-WCD) in (22) and (23), we have
(35)
(36)
Combining (35) and (36), we have
This by premultiplying by and then integrating, we have
Using (33) and (34), we have
This because of hypothesis (A4) implies
Using gives
This, because of hypothesis (A5) implies
(37)
Assume (37) gives
from (24) it follows
Consequently we have
contradicting (32). Hence and
The relations (26) and (27) gives
and
yielding and
.
From (24), we have
(38)
and
(39)
From (25), we have
(40)
and
(41)
The feasibility of for (CP) follows from (38) and (40).
Consider
(by using along (39) and (41)).
This along with the generalized convexity hypotheses implies that is an optimal solution of (M-WCD).
4. Special Cases
Let for
and
be positive semidefinite matrices and continuous on I. Then
where
and
where
Replacing the support function by their corresponding square root of a quadratic form, we have:
Primal (CP0): Minimize
subject to
(M-WCD0): Maximize
subject to
The above pair of nondifferentiable dual control problem has not been explicitly reported in the literature but the duality amongst (CP0) and (M-WCD0) readily follows on the lines of the analysis of the preceding section.
5. Related Nonlinear Programming Problems
If the time dependency of the problem (CP) and (M-WCD) is removed, then these problems reduce to the following problem (NP), its Mond-Weir dual (M-WND):
Primal (NP0): Minimize
subject to
Dual (M-WND0): Maximize
subject to
The above nonlinear programming problems with support functions do not appear in the literature. However, if and
are replaced by
and
respectively in (NP0), then problems reduced to following studied by Hussain et al. [4] .
(P1): Minimize
subject to
(M-WCD): Maximize
subject to
6. Conclusion
Mond-Weir type duality for a control problem having support functions is studied under generalized convexity assumptions. Special cases are deduced. The linkage between the results of this research and those of nonlinear programming problem with support functions is indicated. The problem of this research can be revisited in multiobjective setting.
Cite this paper
I. Husain,Abdul Raoof Shah,Rishi K. Pandey, (2014) Duality for a Control Problem Involving Support Functions. Applied Mathematics,05,3525-3535. doi: 10.4236/am.2014.521330
References
- 1. Husain, I., Ahmad, A. and Shah, A.R. (2014) On a Control Problem with Support Functions. (Submitted for Publication)
- 2. Craven, B.D. (1978) Mathematical Programming and Control Theory. Chapman and Hall, Landon.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5796-1 - 3. Mond, B. and Hanson, M. (1968) Duality for Control Problem. SIAM Journal on Control, 6, 114-120.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1137/0306009 - 4. Husain, I., Abha and Jabeen, Z. (2002) On Nonlinear Programming with Support Function. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computing, 10, 83-99.