6 fc0 sc0 ls0 wsf">coagulation scissors. The seromuscular layer of the nor-
mal gastric wall adjacent to the tumor was dissected by
use of a monopolar electrosurgical device (ForceTri-
Verse® in conjunction with Opti2® electrodes, Covidien,
MA) with an energy platform (ForceTriad®, Covidien,
MA). The normal muscular layer surrounding the tumor
is important for handling the tumor because direct grasp-
ing of the tumor might cause it to rupture. We secured a
5-mm lateral margin around th e tumor. After the submu-
cosal and proper mucosal layers underneath were ob-
served, we carefully used the LSD method with a mo-
nopolar electrosurgical device. Blunt dissection is a safe
and reliable technique to prevent injury to the tumor or
proper mucosal layer. Moreover, a curved spatula tip is
preferable because small vessels are easily coagulated
and dissected bluntly with this type of an electrode tip
(Figure 2(b)). After the resection was completed, the
tumor was immediately collected in a bag. Intact proper
mucosal layer was observed at the bottom of the gastric
wall defect (Figure 2(c)).
All the laparoscop ic procedures wer e carefu lly performed
without any damage to the pseudo-capsule of the GIST.
Throughout the d issection, the active blade of the ultrason ic
coagulation device was placed on the opposite side of the
tumor. The seromuscular layer was laparoscopically ap-
proximated with monofilament absorbable strings (Fi gure
2(d)). Intraoperative endoscopy was effectively used to con-
firm that the mucosa was unbroken and that the stomach
was airtight a fter serosal closure (Figure 2(e) ).
3. Results
This procedure was performed safely without any intraop-
erative complications. The operation time was 170 min,
Copyright © 2012 SciRes. SS
N. WADA ET AL.
Copyright © 2012 SciRes. SS
496
(a) (b) (c)
(d) (e)
Figure 2. (a) Laparoscopic view of the gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). The tumor was located in the middle
part of the lesser curvature and was covered with an intact serosa; (b) Laparoscopic submucosal dissection (LSD). The tumor
had a sufficient lateral margin of normal gastric wall around it and was handled with an atraumatic-hollow jaw grasper,
which does not grasp the tumor itself but grasps the brim of the tumor. The tumor had an intact pseudo-capsule and was
covered with submucosal tissue on the mucosal surface. A curved spatula tip is preferable for blunt dissection during LSD; (c)
Laparoscopic view of the gastric wall after the tumor was removed. The tumor was collected in a bag. Intact proper mucosal
layer was observed at the bottom of the gastric wall defect; (d) Laparoscopic view after the seromuscular layer was appr oxi-
mated with monofilament absorbable strings; (e) Endoscopic view after seromuscular closure. Intraoperative endoscopy con-
firmed the closed mucosa after LSD and air tightness of the stomach.
and the amount of bleeding was very small. The size of
the tumor was 30 × 28 × 25 mm with an exophytic growth
pattern. The tumor was covered with an intact pseudo-
capsule. Immunohistochemical analysis showed that it
was positive for KIT and CD34 but negative for SMA,
desmin, and S-100, which indicates that the tumor was a
GIST. Mitosis was observed 3/50HPF with 2% - 3%
MIB-1-positive cells. Histological analysis showed that
the tumor was covered with an intact p seudo-capsule and
subserosal tissue (Figure 3(a)), and the presence of mar-
ginal submucosal tissue on the pseudo-capsule was con-
firmed (Figure 3(b)). A mutation in the c-kit gene was
detected in the coding region of exon 11.
The postoperative course was uneventful with no
complications. The patient’s dietary intake and body
weight remained unchanged after surgery. No adjuvant
therapy was administered. We followed the patient for 21
months with periodic CT scanning and upper gastrointes-
tinal endoscopy, but we did find any signs of recurrence
or postoperative complaints. Deformity of the area of
excision was minimal, and stenotic changes were not
observed (Figure 4).
4. Discussion
We have reported the operative indications for relatively
small GISTs of the stomach [7]. Surgical resection is the
gold standard for treatment of nonmetastatic primary
GISTs as indicated in published guidelines [3,4]. The
principles of GIST surgery include no injury to the
pseudo-capsule and macroscopically negative margins
[3]. In this context, th e laparoscopic approach to surgical
treatment of gastric GIST is a safe and effective option
for patients with small- and medium-sized tumors if
treated appropriately [8-10]. In this study, we secured a 5
mm lateral margin around the tumor, and normal muscu-
lar tissue was used to handle the tumor to avoid injury to
the pseudo-capsule of the GIST. Furthermore, we care-
fully dissected the submucosal tissue under the magnified
view afforded by the laparoscope, and the presence of
marginal submucosal tissue was confirmed by histological
analysis. This dissection method would be difficult for use
N. WADA ET AL. 497
(a)
(b)
Figure 3. Histology of the resected specimen (hematoxylin
and eosin stain). (a) Serosal side of the tumor (original
magnification ×40). The tumor was covered with an intact
pseudo-capsule and subserosal tissue; (b) Mucosal side of
the tumor (original magnification ×200). Intact pseudo-
capsule and marginal submucosal tissue were confirmed by
histological analysis.
Figure 4. Postoperative endoscopy after 15 months. Stenosis
and significant deformity were not observed.
in open surgery because the resolution of the human eye
would not be sufficient to distinguish the adequate layer
for dissection. Laparoscopic surgery enables us to divide
the submucosal tissue precisely and to find a microscopi-
cally negative margin. In this aspect, endoscopic submu-
cosal dissection (ESD) is comparable with LSD. The
ESD method has been established as a promising endo-
scopic therapy for early gastric cancer [11]. The vertical
margin of the tumor is clearly visualized in ESD. In LSD,
the submucosal layer can also be seen as clearly, which
enables us to create a secure margin during submucosal
dissection.
Katoh and coworkers reported the endoscopic enuclea-
tion of gastric GISTs [12]. The indication of endoscopic
enucleation is limited to tumors arising from the submu-
cosa leaving the muscularis propria free of the tumor.
Furthermore, the size of the tumor has to be less than 3
cm because larger tumors cannot be retrieved from the
mouth. In this report, the authors showed that tumor re-
section with submucosal dissection can be used to achieve
complete resection of the tumor and for a curative on-
cologic outcome.
The characteristics of LSD include 1) minimal de-
formity of the stomach, 2) clean sur gery without stomach
exploration, and 3) lower costs and smaller ports because
of the lack of stapling devices. However, this procedure
has disadvantages such as 1) unknown oncological valid-
ity, 2) technically advanced surgery, and 3) a relatively
longer operation time. From our limited experience, how-
ever, these drawbacks of LSD are limited, and this new
technique is feasible.
Hiki et al. [13] reported the usefulness of laparoscopic
and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) for gastric
wedge resection of gastric SMT. In comparison with
LECS, LSD can lead to less deformity and create a cleaner
environment during surgery. They have also reported that
the success of the procedure does not depend on tumor
location, such as the vicinity of the esophagogastric junc-
tion or pyloric ring. We performed LSD for a patient
with benign SMT of the cardia, and the results of the
surgery were as good as those for the method pre- sented
here (data not shown).
Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NO-
TES) [14] may be a less invasive treatment for gastric
GIST. This type of partial gastrectomy would minimize
the size of the abdominal wound and the amount of post-
operative pain. However, the invasiveness of the NOTES
procedure in the stomach are the same as that for laparo-
scopic surgery. Therefore, LSD would have better out-
comes in terms of surgical site infections and postopera-
tive stomach function.
In LSD, surgical staplers are not required, which
means that the cost and size of the trocars are reduced
compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery.
Copyright © 2012 SciRes. SS
N. WADA ET AL.
Copyright © 2012 SciRes. SS
498
5. Conclusion
We suggest that LSD is a curative and less invasive
treatment for GIST of the stomach. Further investigations
are necessary to evaluate the oncological and functional
outcomes of this novel procedure.
6. Disclosure
Drs. N. Wada, Y. Saikawa, H. Takeuchi, T. Igarashi, T.
Oyama, T. Takahashi, R. Nakamura, K. Kameyama, M
Mukai, Y. Kitagawa have no conflicts of interest or fi-
nancial ties to disclose.
REFERENCES
[1] M. Scarpa, M. Bertin, C. Ruffolo, L. Polese, D. F. D’ Amic o
and I. Angriman, “A Systematic Review on the Clinical
Diagnosis of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors,” Journal
of Surgical Oncology, Vol. 98, No. 5, 2008, pp. 384-392.
doi:10.1002/jso.21120
[2] P. Gupta, M. Tewari and H. S. Shukla, “Gastrointestinal
Stromal Tumor,” Surgical Oncology, Vol. 17, No. 2, 2008,
pp. 129-138. doi:10.1016/j.suronc.2007.12.002
[3] T. Nishida, S. Hirota, A. Yanagisawa, Y. Sugino, M.
Minami, Y. Yamamura, Y. Otani, Y. Shimada, F. Taka-
hashi and T. Kubota, “Clinical Practice Guidelines for
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST) in Japan: English
Version,” International Journal of Clinical Oncology,
Vol. 13, No. 5, 2008, pp. 416-430.
doi:10.1007/s10147-008-0798-7
[4] G. D. Demetri, R. S. Benjamin, C. D. Blanke, J. Y. Blay,
P. Casali, H. Choi, C. L. Corless, M. Debiec-Rychter, R.
P. DeMatteo, D. S. Ettinger, G. A. Fisher, C. D. Fletcher,
A. Gronchi, P. Hohenberger, M. Hughes, H. Joensuu, I.
Judson, A. Le Cesne, R. G. Maki, M. Morse, A. S. Pappo,
P. W. Pisters, C. P. Raut, P. Reichardt, D. S. Tyler, A. D.
Van den Abbeele, M. von Mehren, J. D. Wayne and J.
Zalcberg, “NCCN Task Force Report: Management of
Patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST)
—Update of the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines,”
Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network,
Vol. 5, Suppl. 2, 2007, pp. S1-S29, Quiz: S30.
[5] J. Y. Blay, S. Bonvalot, P. Casali, H. Choi, M. De-
biec-Richter, A. P. Dei Tos, J. F. Emile, A. Gronchi, P. C.
Hogendoorn, H. Joensuu, A. Le Cesne, J. McClure, J.
Maurel, N. Nupponen, I. Ray-Coquard, P. Reichardt, R.
Sciot, S. Stroobants, M. van Glabbeke, A. van Oosterom
and G. D. Demetri, “Consensus Meeting for the Man-
agement of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: Report of
the GIST Consensus Conference of 20-21 March 2004,
under the Auspices of ESMO,” Annals of Oncology, Vol.
16, No. 4, 2005, pp. 566-578.
doi:10.1093/annonc/mdi127
[6] F. Catena, M. Di Battista, P. Fusaroli, L. Ansaloni, V. Di
Scioscio, D. Santini, M. Pantaleo, G. Biasco, G. Caletti
and A. Pinna, “Laparoscopic Treatment of Gastric Gist:
Report of 21 Cases and Literature’s Review,” Journal of
Gastrointestinal Surgery, Vol. 12, No. 3, 2008, pp. 561-
568. doi:10.1007/s11605-007-0416-4
[7] Y. Otani, T. Furukawa, M. Yoshida, Y. Saikawa, N.
Wada, M. Ueda, T. Kubota, M. Mukai, K. Kameyama, Y.
Sugino, K. Kumai and M. Kitajima, “Operative Indica-
tions for Relatively Small (2 - 5 cm) Gastrointestinal Stro-
mal Tumor of the Stomach Based on Analysis of 60 Op-
erated Cases,” Surgery, Vol. 139, No. 4, 2006, pp. 484-
492. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2005.08.011
[8] Y. W. Novitsky, K. W. Kercher, R. F. Sing and B. T.
Heniford, “Long-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Resec-
tion of Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors,” Annals
of Surgery, Vol. 243, No. 6, 2006, pp. 738-747.
doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000219739.11758.27
[9] G. R. Silberhumer, M. Hufschmid, F. Wrba, G. Gyoeri, S.
Schoppmann, B. Tribl, E. Wenzl, G. Prager, F. Laengle
and J. Zacherl, “Surgery for Gastrointestinal Stromal Tu-
mors of the Stomach,” Journal of Gastrointestinal Sur-
gery, Vol. 13, No. 7, 2009, pp. 1213-1219.
doi:10.1007/s11605-009-0872-0
[10] S. M. Choi, M. C. Kim, G. J. Jung, H. H. Kim, H. C.
Kwon, S. R. Choi, J. S. Jang and J. S. Jeong, “Laparo-
scopic Wedge Resection for Gastric GIST: Long-Term
Follow-Up Results,” European Journal of Surgical On-
cology, Vol. 33, No. 4, 2007, pp. 444-447.
doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2006.11.003
[11] I. Oda, T. Gotoda, H. Hamanaka, T. Eguchi, Y. Saito, T.
Matsuda, P. Bhandari, F. Emura, D. Saito and H. Ono,
“Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Gastric
Cancer: Technical Feasibility, Operation Time and Com-
plications from a Large Consecutive Series,” Digestive
Endoscopy, Vol. 17, No. 1, 2005, pp. 54-58.
doi:10.1111/j.1443-1661.2005.00459.x
[12] T. Katoh, Y. Itoh, T. Mohri and H. Suzuki, “Endoscopic
Enucleation of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors of the
Stomach: Report of Five Cases,” World Journal of Gas-
troenterology, Vol. 14, No. 16, 2008, pp. 2609-2611.
doi:10.3748/wjg.14.2609
[13] N. Hiki, Y. Yamamoto, T. Fukunaga, T. Yamaguchi, S.
Nunobe, M. Tokunaga, A. Miki, S. Ohyama and Y. Seto,
“Laparoscopic and Endoscopic Cooperative Surgery for
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Dissection,” Surgical En-
doscopy, Vol. 22, No. 7, 2008, pp. 1729-1735.
doi:10.1007/s00464-007-9696-8
[14] K. Nakajima, T. Nishida, T. Takahashi, Y. So uma, J. Hara,
T. Yamada, T.Yoshio, T. Tsutsui, T. Yokoi, M. Mori and
Y. Doki, “Partial Gastrectomy Using Natural Orifice Trans-
lumenal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) for Gastric Sub-
mucosal Tumors: Early Experience in Humans,” Surgical
Endoscopy, Vol. 23, No. 12, 2009, pp. 2650-2655.
doi:10.1007/s00464-009-0474-7