
R. DE SOUZA ET AL.
fies the clear usefulness of the material pedagogically, the tea-
cher’s response was categorical: “Sure, absolutely!”
The 2nd Grade Student’s Opinion—High School Level
The material was also evaluated by a blind sixteen y ears old
boy, who was at second grade of a high school in Niteroi. The
material was presented as an individual lesson about the theme
Fungi Kingdom.
As the student knowledge about the theme was very small,
the class began with the phylum exemplification without using
the material, talking about the fungi habitat and their ecological,
economic and medical importance. The use of the material st a rt ed
only during the explanation of macroscopic and microscopic
fungi, to exemplify these microorganisms.
According to the student the material can be useful in the c la ss -
room as he said: “You have to show it to my biology teacher,
you know? You have to show it since it is the only way they will
have an idea how to teach me. Because, please, looks how it is
boring! the teachers always say—you have to study, must study,
must study—but if I do not have anything written or recorded
on my computer (how to study?) … Because I’ll put the recorde r
to record the lesson in class but the voice of my colleagues
disturbs a lot and it has been a loss of time and energy.”
To determine whether the blind student is able to identify the
fungi structures after class, we exposed the material in a ran-
dom form to him. Interestingly, the student was able to distin-
guish all fungal structures represented in each model even when
presented out of order.
The Student’s Opinion—Complete High School Level
The last interview was performed with a blind student who
just finished high school and was attending classes to get into a
university. The material was presented a s performed for the first
student with an initial oral lesson and then the material exposi-
tion.
The student showed a great interest in pronunciation and spell-
ing of fungi names and structures. This behavior was related to
his necessity of studying for the university exams. This curios-
ity required greater use of the Braille text. Similar to the teacher’s
opinion, according to this student, he understood the texts but
the reading of Braille prepared with the slates was faster that
those hand-free made.
He also examined the structure and size of the embossed d raw -
ings, and informed that it was possible to feel and visualize the
structures, whose size was adequate. According to the student:
“The material is excellent, does not hurt or irritate and its high
tactical property is very useful. Can you build a plant cell in the
paper for me? Because I have a little difficulty with cell as I do
not see it.”
The overall analysis of the material in these locus tests with
the three blind subjects showed that the material attended most
of the proposed criteria including easiness on using it, percep-
tion of the fungi structures and acceptance of the material. Be-
sides, it did not expose students to risks as hurt, skin irritation
or cut during handling (Cerqueira & Ferreira, 2000; Bruno &
Mota, 2001). The only issue was the understanding of t he Braille
text that pointed to the need of using slate and stylus in order to
guarantee the fastest access to the text.
Regarding to the material resistance, during the atlas prepa-
ration, the strength of the material was considered, so the dura-
bility is long. The material composition also allows it to be han-
dling by many student s and be redone frequently by anyone. Th e
lifetime of this material could not be defined, but many people
have used this material and it has persisted for three years with
the same physical characteristics since now.
Conclusion
Both normal sight students and visually impaired students can
learn and develop if properly stimulated and attended. In this
work, based on the people interviewed about the tactical didac-
tical material produced herein, we detected the necessity of pre-
paring more teaching materials or other forms of guarantee the
access of knowledge for students with special needs. We beli eve
that our goal to teach the blind students more clearly was reached
and led to the creation of a material that can be employed not
only for teaching biological themes but also other topics from
other areas and disciplines.
Acknowledgements
We thank FA PERJ, PR OEX-UFF an d FOPESQ- UFF for th ei r
financial support and fellowships.
REFERENCES
Batista, C. G. (2005). Concept forma tion in blind children: Theoretical
questions and educational implications. Psychology: Theory and Re-
search, 21, 7-15.
Brasil (1996). Lei No. 9394, de 20 de dezembro de 1996. Establishes
the guidelines and bases of Education. Published in the Official Ga-
zette of the Federative Republic of Brazil, National Press, No. 248,
Brasília, No. 248, 23 December 1996.
http://portal.mec.gov.br/arquivos/pdf/diretrizes.pdf
Bruno, M. M. G., & Mota, G. B. (2001). Training program for elemen-
tary school human resources: Visual impairment. Vol. 1, Brasília:
Ministry of Education, Office of Special Education.
Carneiro, M. A. (2007). The access of students with disabilities in or-
dinary schools and classes: Possibilities and limitations. Publisher
Voices, Petropólis.
Cerceira, J. B., & Ferreira, E. M. B. (2000). Teaching resources in
special education. Magazine Benjamin Co n s ta n t, 5, 15-20.
Delou, C. M. C., Machado, S., Mazza-Guimarães, I., Marinho, L.,
Mariani, R., Vasconcelos, K., Rodrigues, C. R., & Castro, H. C.
(2012). School of inclusion: The contribution of a federal university
to the inclusive education. Advances in Education, 1, 4-10.
Feltrin, A. E. (2007). Social inclusion in schools: When pedagogy is the
difference. In Pauline (Ed.), Pedagogy and the difference (3rd Edi-
tion). Sao Paulo.
Ferreira, J. R. (1998). The new LDB and special educational needs.
Notebook Cedes, Campinas, 19, 7-15.
Ferreira, J. R. & Glat, R. (2003). Educational reforms post-BDL: The
inclusion of students with special needs in the context of decentrali-
zation. In: D. B. Souza, & L. C. M. Faria, Decentralization, decen-
tralization and financing of education in Brazil post-BDL (pp. 372-
390). DP & A Publishing.
Gasparetto, M. E. R. F., Temporini, E. R., Carvalho, K. M. M. et al.
(2001). The student with low vision in regular schools: A challenge
for the teacher? Brazilian Archives of Ophthalmology, 64, 45-51.
Grifing, H. C., & Gerber, P. J. (1996). Tactile development and its im-
plications in the education of blind children. Magazine Benjamin
Constant, 5th Edition.
Glat, R., & Fernandes, E. M. (2005). Of segregated education to inclu-
sive education: A brief reflection on the educational paradigms in the
context of special education in Brazil. Magazine Inclusion, 1, 35-39.
Glat, R., & Nogueira, M. L. de L. (2002). Educational policy and tea-
cher training for inclusive education in Brazil. Magazine Integration,
14, 22-27.
Glat, R., & Pletsch, M. D. O. (2004). The role of the university in the
Copyright © 2012 SciRe s . 677