Paper Menu >>
Journal Menu >>
Home | About SCIRP | Sitemap | Contact Us
Copyright ? 2006-2013 Scientific Research Publishing Inc. All rights reserved.
2012. Vol.3, Special Issue, 79 5-801
Published Online September 2012 in SciRes (http://www.SciRP.org/journal/psych) http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/psych.2012.329120
Copyright © 2012 SciRes. 795
Improvements in Maternal Depression as a Mediator of Child
Judy Hutchings1, Tracey Bywater2, Margiad Elen Williams1, Eleanor Lane1,
Christopher J. Whitaker3
1Centre for Evidence-Based Ea rly Intervention, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
2Institute for Effective Education, University of York, York, UK
3North Wales Organisation of Ran domised Controlled Trials in Health & Social Care, Bangor University,
Received June 5th, 2012; revised July 8th, 2012; accepted August 2nd, 2012
Depression is a common and debilitating illness and there is a strong association between maternal de-
pression and childhood Conduct Disorder (CD). This paper examines the impact of maternal depression
on the outcome of treatment for the prevention of CD. Data from the Hutchings et al. (2007) Randomised
Controlled Trial (RCT) of a parenting programme for parents of high-risk three and four year olds are
used to explore the potential role of change in maternal depression as a mediator of child behaviour out-
come. The role of positive parenting as an additional mediator was also examined due to previous re-
search findings. Improvement in maternal depression was found to be a significant partial mediator of
improvement in child behaviour. Maternal depression continued to be a partial mediator when positive
parenting was included in the mediation model. Parenting interventions for the prevention of CD are more
likely to result in improved child behaviour when they also address the skill deficits known to be associ-
ated with maternal depression.
Keywords: Maternal Depression; Child Behaviour Problems; Parenting Intervention/Training; Mediator
Maternal De pression and Childhood C onduct
There is substantial literature showing the co-occurrence of
maternal depression and Conduct Disorder (CD) in children
(Goodman et al., 2011; Gross, Shaw, & Moilanen, 2008). More
than 50% of mothers of children with CD have clinical levels of
depression (Alpern & Lyons-Ruth, 1993; Webster-Stratton &
Hammond, 1988; Hutchings, 1996) and among parents of older
CD children (aged eight and above) Hutchings et al. (2011)
found that 79% of 300 parents reported clinically significant
levels of depression.
Some evidence suggests that maternal depression is causal in
the development of CD (Patterson, 1982; Rutter, 1996). De-
pressed mothers exhibit low rates of praise and failure in moni-
toring their child’s behaviour, which are both associated with
the development of CD (Webster-Stratton & Herbert, 1994).
Even shortly after birth, coded videos of mother-infant interact-
tions show differences in behaviour between depressed and
non-depressed mothers (Field, 1995a, 1995b). Other research
suggests that problematic child behaviour can precipitate ma-
ternal depression, particularly if the child displays characteris-
tics that make parenting difficult, such as temperament prob-
lems and poor sleep patterns (Webster-Stratton & Spitzer, 1996).
There can also be external predictors for both conditions such
as socio-economic disadvantage that have been shown to be
independently associated with both problems (Silberg & Rutter,
2002; Mensah & Kiernan, 2010).
There are a number of skill deficits commonly associated
with depression that have also been shown independently to
describe parents of conduct problem children. These include
poor problem solving and inability to recall specific events. De-
pressed people display over-general rather than specific memo-
ries (Williams et al., 2007; Williams, 1996) and this has been
shown to be associated with poor problem solving (Evans, Wil-
liams, O’Loughlin, & Howells, 1992; Pollock & Williams,
2001; van Vreeswijk & Wilde, 2004). Wahler and colleagues
(Wahler & Dumas, 1989; Wahler & Sansbury, 1990), and Mc-
Mahon & Frick (2005), found that, while mothers of children
with CD tended to focus on their children’s deviant behaviours,
their descriptions of behaviour were lacking in detail and over-
general. Similarly, Hutchings et al. (1998) found that, compared
to a non-referred sample, mothers of children referred to a child
and adult mental health service with behavioural problems had
significantly lower ability to recall specific events in relation to
their child’s life.
Parents of children with CD and depressed individuals also
both show insensitivity to the cues of others and have poor
observation skills (Cummings & Davies, 1994; Meunier, 2007).
Hutchings, Smith, and Gilbert (2000) showed that their meas-
ures of maternal observational style, autobiographical memory,
and parental problem solving were highly correlated and dif-
ferentiated well between the parents of children referred for
treatment of CD and parents of non-referred children.
Studies for the Treatment and Prevention of CD
Intervention programmes that have been most effective with
parents of children with CD address skill deficits that are com-
J. HUTCHINGS ET AL.
mon in this population (Hutchings, Gardner, & Lane, 2005). In
a review of parenting programmes, Barlow, Coren, and Stew-
art-Brown (2009) found them to be effective at improving both
child behaviour and a range of parental factors, including ma-
ternal depression, anxiety, and self-esteem. While some studies
have found that maternal depression can predict poor outcomes
for interventions to address CD (Beauchaine, Webster-Stratton,
& Reid, 2005; Forehand, Furey, & McMahon, 1984; Hinshaw,
2002) others have demonstrated that not only can gains be
made for the child, despite maternal depression, but also that
the depression itself improves significantly as a result of parent
training (Hutchings, Appleton, Smith, Lane, & Nash, 2002;
Hutchings et al., 2007; Hutchings, Lane, & Kelly, 2004). In one
of the few studies to provide long-term data, Hutchings et al.
(2002, 2004) compared the results of providing standard Child
and Adolescent Mental Health Service (CAMHS) management
advice with an intensive treatment programme involving coach-
ing and rehearsing parents in relevant skills and incorporated
observational skills training and realistic goal setting. While the
CAMHS treatment resulted in short-term improvements in
child behaviour, it did not impact on maternal mental health
and the improvements in child behaviour were not maintained
beyond the six-month follow-up. By contrast, the intensive
treatment group significantly improved both child behaviour
and maternal mental health at six months and these improve-
ments were both still significantly better at a four-year follow
up compared to baseline. Hutchings, Lane et al. (2004) suggest
that the long-term improvements were due to the intensive
treatment’s focus on helping parents to learn and practice effec-
tive observation and problem solving skills as well as specific
child management strategies. They concluded that for parents
experiencing depression, without improvement of maternal
depression, the benefits of parenting interventions may not be
Maternal depression may be a mediating variable between
intervention and child behaviour. That is, some, or all, of the
effect of the intervention on child behaviour may be a result of
a change in maternal depression. The identification of mediat-
ing variables is important in gaining a better understanding of
how parent programmes work, so that, in developing and im-
proving interventions, special attention can be given to factors
shown to have a significant effect on outcome (Laurenceau,
Hayes, & Feldman, 2007; Goodman et al., 2011).
The aim of this study is to examine the potential mediating
effect of maternal depression on the outcome of a parent pro-
gramme to reduce child behaviour problems using data from a
Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT) of the Incredible Years (IY)
Parent programme (Hutchings et al., 2007). In a recent evalua-
tion of the IY Parent programme delivered as a preventive in-
tervention to parents of children at risk of developing CD, sig-
nificant improvements in parental depression, parenting skills
and child behaviour were found at the six-month follow-up (see
Table 1) (Hutchings et al., 2007). Improvements in parental de-
pression, parenting skills, and child behaviour were maintained
at 12-month and 18-month follow-up (Bywater et al., 2009).
Additionally, a similar study using the same data set found that
observed positive parenting partially mediated the relationship
between intervention status and child behaviour problems,
therefore this study aims to investigate whether maternal de-
pression and positive parenting are joint mediators.
The RCT was conducted in 11 Sure Start areas in north and mid
Wales. These areas had been identified by Local Authorities as
having high levels of social and economical disadvantage and
received government funding to support services for children
under five years of age. Baseline characteristics of the children
in the sample are presented in Table 2.
One hundred and fifty three children and their primary care-
givers were recruited to the trial and were randomised on a 2:1
basis to intervention or waiting list control conditions. Health
visitors administered the Eyberg Child Behaviour Inventory
(ECBI: Robinson, Eyberg, & Ross, 1980) to parents of pre-
school children aged between 36 and 59 months. The ECBI
measures levels of child behaviour problems. Participants were
eligible if the child scored above the clinical cut-off on the
ECBI problem or intensity scale, lived with the primary care-
giver and the caregiver was able to attend an IY parenting
group (Hutchings et al., 2007).
The participating caregivers attended 12 weekly group ses-
sions lasting 2 to 2.5 hours per week. The IY BASIC Parent
programme (Webster-Stratton & Hancock, 1998) was delivered
to each group by two trained leaders. Control families were
offered the programme after the six-month follow-up.
The following measures were collected for the original
evaluation during two home visits at each time point, at base-
line and one at six-month follow up, by which time the inter-
vention parents had received the programme. All measures are
standardized measures typically used in the evaluation of par-
enting interventions. Full details of all measures, scoring, ra-
tionale for use, normative data, reliability and validity can be
seen in the protocol of measures (Hutch i n g s , E a de et al., 2004).
Measures of Child Problem Behaviour
The Eyberg Child Behaviour Inventory (ECBI; Robinson et
al., 1980). A 36-item inventory of child behaviours measured
on two scales: a 7-point intensity scale and a Yes/No scale of
whether the behaviour is viewed as a problem. The Yes/No
problem scale was used for data analysis in this study. The
ECBI demonstrates good stability and homogeneity, with reli-
ability coefficients from .86 (test-retest) to .98 (internal consis-
tency). The scale has also shown good convergent validity, with
ECBI scores being significantly correlated with scores on the
Child Behaviour Check List (CBCL; Achenbach & Edelbrock,
Baseline and six-month follow- u p measures.
Intervention (n = 86)
Mean (SD) Control (n = 47)
Measure Baseline F-up Baseline F-up
ECBI-problem score16.6 (6.9)9.5 (7.9)*** 14.7 (7.7) 13.7 (8.3)
BDI-II 17.7 (10.8)10.3 (10.2)*** 15.0 (9. 7) 13.7 (10.3)
Positive parenting§23.0 (19.3)32.4 (19.3)** 21. 9 (15.4)21.7 (16.8)
Note: §Frequency count in 30 minutes; **p < .01, ***p < .001, results of paired t
tests to compare baseline and follow-up scores.
Copyright © 2012 SciRes.
J. HUTCHINGS ET AL.
1983) and the Parenting Stress Index (PSI; Abidin, 1995).
Measures of Maternal Depression
The Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II; Beck et al., 1961).
A 21-item inventory measuring the severity, on a scale of 0 to 3,
of symptoms associated with depression. The BDI-II demon-
strates high internal consistency with a mean coefficient alpha
of .92 reported for psychiatric groups and .93 for college stu-
dents (Beck, Steer, & Brown, 1996). The test-retest reliability
correlation is .93. Various types of analysis were used to esti-
mate the convergent validity of the BDI-II. The correlation
between the BDI-II and BDI-I was .93 (p < .001).
The Dyadic Parent-Child Interaction Coding System (DPICS;
Eyberg & Robinson, 1981) was used to code positive parenting
behaviour in a 30-minute home observation. Observers were
blind to group allocation and inter-reliability was tested and
maintained through regular training. The DPICS has shown
good reliability with mean reliability between raters of .91 for
parent behaviours and .92 for child behaviours. Kappa coeffi-
cients for the current study showed high reliability amongst
raters (an average of = .91 over the two time points) on 20%
of the total visits. The discriminant validity of the DPICS has
been established through a number of studies (e.g. Eyberg &
Since the hypothesis concerns maternal depression, data for
fathers was not included in the analysis. Complete data (both
baseline and six-month follow-up) from 130 mothers and their
children was available for analysis. Of these families, 85 took
part in the intervention and 45 were waiting-list control fami li e s.
Control families were offered the IY Parent programme after
the six-month follow-up visit had been completed. Fifty-seven
(44%) mothers were in the clinical range for depression at
To examine the effect of the mediator variable a series of re-
gression analyses were conducted using SPSS 17.0. A total of
four regression parameters were estimated as described by
Baron and Kenny (1986): 1) the parameter for the mediator
regressed on the predictor variable; 2) the parameter for the
mediator regressed on the outcome variable; 3) the parameter
for the outcome variable regressed on the predictor variable;
and 4) the parameter representing the indirect effect of the pre-
dictor on the outcome via the mediator. Bootstrap procedures
described by Preacher and Hayes (2008) was used to estimate
the indirect effect of intervention status on change in child be-
haviour due to the small sample size (Preacher & Hayes, 2004,
2008). It is also the recommended procedure for testing media-
tion models in developmental psychology (Dearing & Hamilton,
2006). The reported results are based on 5000 bootstrap sam-
ples and both child age and child gender were included as co-
variates. Change scores were calculated using simple subtract-
tion, such that a higher change score represents greater im-
provement in the desired therapeutic direction. Using change
scores ensures that baseline levels of positive parenting and
maternal depression are controlled for in the analysis and has
been used in similar mediation analyses (e.g. Gardner et al.,
Simple Mediation Model
Figure 1 shows a schematic of the simple mediation model
in which change in maternal depression is a proposed mediator
of the relationship between intervention status and changes in
child behaviour. Results of the mediation analysis using boot-
strap procedures are displayed in Table 3.
Results show that the indirect effect of maternal depression
was significant (b = 3.89, p = .011). Bias corrected and acceler-
ated (BCa) confidence intervals (CI) indicate that maternal
depression is a partial mediator of the relationship between in-
tervention status and child behaviour since the CI do not cross
Multiple Mediation Model
Since previous research has shown improvements in positive
parenting to mediate the relationship between intervention
status and child behaviour problems (see Gardner et al., 2010;
Simple mediation model of the effect of intervention status on child
behaviour through maternal depression (controlling for child age and
Characteristics of the families in the sample at baseline.
n = 86 Control
n = 47 Intervention
n = 18 Control
n = 2
No. (%) of boys 49 (57) 31 (66) 7 (39) 29(100)
No. (%) Welsh speaking10 (12) 9 (19) 3 (17) 0(0)
Child age in months (SD)46.4 (6.6) 46.2 (4.2) 43.9 (4.8)52 (1.4)
No. (%) single parent 38 (44) 16 (34) 9 (50) 1 (50)
Total weekly income <
£64/person 76 (88) 42 (89) 17 (94) 2 (100)
Mean (SD) age of mother
at birth of first child 21.4 (5.0) 20.5 (4.2) 21.4 (4.4)17 (0)
Conduct problems (EC BI)16.5 (7.0) 14.8 (7.7) 15.7(5. 1)28 (4.2)
Hyperactivity (SDQ) 6.2 (2.7)6.9 (2.2) 5.9(1.9)8.5 (.7)
Self Control (SCRS) 127.9 (29.8) 130.2 (27.7) 119. 2(24.2)130.5 (27.6)
Note: *A two sample t test found no significant differences between int ervention
families who remained in the study and those lost to follow up. This was not
tested for control families; ECBI = Eyberg child behaviour inventory; SDQ =
Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire; SCRS = Self-control rating scale.
Copyright © 2012 SciRes. 797
J. HUTCHINGS ET AL.
Shaw et al., 2009), a multiple mediator analysis, using macros
written by Preacher and Hayes (2008), was conducted to ex-
amine whether both maternal depression and positive parenting
are mediators. Figure 2 shows the schematic of the multiple
mediator model in which both maternal depression and positive
parenting skills were proposed to mediate the relation ship betwe en
intervention status and change in child behaviour. The total
indirect effect for both proposed mediators was significant with
BCa CI of 1.05 - 4.20, indicating that both maternal depression
and positive parenting skills mediated the relationship between
intervention status and change in child behaviour (see Table 3).
The specific indirect effect of each mediator was 1.57
through maternal depression and .60 through positive parenting.
Further examination of the specific contribution of each indirect
effect using BCa CI revealed that both are significant mediators
of the relationship between intervention status and change in
child behaviour (i.e. none of the CI cross zero). Maternal de-
pression seems to be the stronger mediator however contrasts
revealed no significant difference between the two mediators
since the CI crosses zero (Table 3).
Multiple mediation model of the effect of intervention status on child
behaviour through maternal depression and positive parenting (control-
ling for child age and gender).
Mediation of the relationship between intervention status and child
behaviour through maternal depression and observed positive parent-
Bootstrap BCa 95% CI
Estimate S.E. z LowerUpper
Model summary for maternal depression
Maternal Depression 1.6980 .6683 2.5405 .6056 3.5027
Model summary for maternal depression/positive parenting
Total 2.1631 .7651 2.8275** 1.05434.2017
Maternal Depression 1.5669 .6512 2.4062* .5850 3.3099
Positive Parenting .5963 .3899 1.5292 . 0591 2.0297
MD vs. PP 1.0119 .7409 1.3658 –.52952.8889
Note: *p < .05; **p < .01. BCa, bias corrected and accelerated; MD, maternal
depression; PP, positive parenting. Estimates based on 5000 bootstrap samples.
The first aim of this study was to establish whether im-
provements in maternal depression mediate improvements in
child behaviour following attendance on an IY Parent pro-
gramme. Results using a simple mediation model showed that
maternal depression was a partial mediator of the relationship
between intervention status and improved child behaviour. The
second aim of this study was to examine whether both maternal
depression and positive parenting together mediate this rela-
tionship. A multiple mediator analysis was conducted showing
that both variables were partial mediators with no significant
difference between their specific contributions to the indirect
These findings are important as they add to our understand-
ing of the mechanisms operating when child behaviour im-
proves as a result of parent training. Identifying mediators is
necessary if we are to understand the active ingredients of
treatment. These results extend previous findings by Gardner et
al. (2010) who found that an increase in observed positive par-
enting behaviour was a partial mediator for improved child
behaviour. The present findings suggest that both change in the
practice of positive parenting and change in maternal depres-
sion are key factors mediating change in child problem behav-
One explanation for why improvements in maternal depres-
sion were seen in mothers who attended a parent programme
dealing with their childrens’ behaviour problems is that im-
proving parents’ skills increases their confidence, which in turn
improves their mental health. DeGarmo et al. (2004) found that
improvements in parenting skills were followed by improve-
ments in child behaviour and which were subsequently fol-
lowed by improvements in maternal depression. Shaw et al.
(2009) found that maternal depression was a significant media-
tor of the relationship between a toddler intervention and child
behaviour problems when accounting for the effects of positive
parenting. The results of the current study corroborate these
The IY parent programme includes components and strate-
gies that promote effective parenting by addressing specific
skill deficits. Parents are taught accurate observation skills, goal
setting and problem solving skills, which are known to be defi-
cient in parents experiencing depression. It also provides the
opportunity for these skills to be practiced and reinforced, ini-
tially in group-based practice and subsequently by success in
home activities with children (Hut c h i n g s e t a l ., 2005).
Gaining experience of using new skills with success is par-
ticularly important for depressed parents. Early functional ac-
counts of depression such as those posited by Fester (1973) and
Seligman (1975) reasoned that a depressed individual’s inabil-
ity to deal with problems was due to the failure of past efforts
to be rewarded. Fester described the behavioural patterns that
characterised depression, as a low rate of positively reinforced
behaviours and a high rate of escape and av oida nce f rom st ress-
ful situations. These ideas were developed by Seligman in his
“learned helplessness” theory of depression (1975). His re-
search with animals and humans lead him to conclude that
when repeatedly confronted by situations that are outside their
control, people cease trying to do things that could potentially
improve their situation. As a reduction in activity reduces op-
portunities for their actions to be reinforced by success, it
serves to maintain feelings of helplessness and depression.
Copyright © 2012 SciRes.
J. HUTCHINGS ET AL.
Seligman (1975) suggested that “forced” exposure to success
was the most effective strategy to overcome learned helpless-
ness. The group based rehearsal and training for home activities
encouraged in the IY programme may be doing just that. The
emphasis on teaching observation, problem solving and realistic
goal setting skills and rehearsal of these new skills increases the
likelihood that the new behaviours will be reinforced by their
success. This also impacts on parental depression, giving par-
ents more confidence in their parenting abilities and their abil-
ity to manage other aspects of their life. In the present study, 25
(61%) of the intervention parents who scored in the clinical
range on the BDI-II at baseline, moved to the non-clinical range
at follow-up. This compared with five (31%) of those in the
It is likely that the extent to which the skill deficits are ad-
dressed contributes to the varying outcomes in both child be-
haviour and maternal depression that are reported in the litera-
ture. While some studies have found maternal depression to
predict poor intervention outcome, almost 30 years of research
of the IY programme using high quality RCT trials, has consis-
tently demonstrated significant improvements in both parental
mental health and outcomes for children. Evidence also sug-
gests that improvements in child behaviour are more likely to
be maintained over time when there are also improvements in
maternal mental health (Hutchings, Lane et al. 2004). The find-
ings of the present study add to the evidence that the aspects of
the IY programme (training in observation skills, rehearsal and
problem solving) that are also likely to impact on maternal
mental health are important ingredients in improving child be-
An alternative explanation for the improvements in maternal
depression could be that the increased social support and access
to a trained group facilitator lead to improvement in maternal
mood. All the parents who attended the groups had children
who scored above the clinical cut-off for behaviour problems
and were considered to be socially disadvantaged based on
number of risk factors (e.g. single parents, teenage parents,
family poverty, history of drug/alcohol abuse, etc.). It is possi-
ble that having access to a group of people with similar chal-
lenges meant that parents no longer felt alone. Also having
access to a trained professional to help with their children’s
challenging behaviour may have lessened depressive symptoms
and enabled parents to feel more in control of their lives. Sev-
eral studies have found associations between poor maternal
mental health and low social support (Sheppard, 1994, 1997,
2009). However there are many parent programmes that report
that depressed people do less well in addressing child behaviour
problems so the evidence suggests that it is the specific com-
ponents of the IY programme described above that result in the
changes found (Gardner et al., 2006; Hutchings et al., 2007).
Limitations of the Study
One limitation of this study concerns the use of parent-report
for both child behaviour problems and maternal depressive
symptoms. It is possible that the improvement in maternal de-
pression changed mother’s view of their own parenting prac-
tices, their child’s behaviour and their impression that their
child’s behaviour was a problem. Previous research has found
larger effect sizes for studies that relied on mother-report of
child externalizing problems compared to child self-report,
others’ reports, or independent observations (Goodman et al.,
2011). However, a number of studies have shown the ECBI
parent report measure to correlate significantly with independ-
ent observation of child behaviour (Webster-Stratton, 1985;
Webster-Stratton & Hammond, 1998; Webster-Stratton & Lind-
say, 1999). Nevertheless, it is important for future research to
include objective measures of both child behaviour and mater-
Another limitation is that, due to the design of this trial, tem-
poral precedence for the mediators was not established. Both
mediators (maternal depression and positive parenting) and the
outcome variable (child behaviour) were assessed at the same
time point meaning that it is not possible to see whether these
potential mediators are actual causal agents or covariates of
change (Laurenceau et al., 2007). Future research using a more
appropriate design including several measurement time points
for both child behaviour and maternal depression would solve
The co-occurrence of maternal depression and child conduct
problems is well established. While this may be explained by a
number of causal pathways, the findings of this mediator analy-
sis show that improvements in child behaviour following the
programme were partially but significantly mediated by im-
provements in maternal depression. Findings also showed that
both maternal depression and positive parenting together were
mediators of intervention status on child behaviour. This sug-
gests that, for interventions to be effective in reducing child
conduct problems, they need to emphasise those aspects of the
programme that are also likely to impact on maternal depres-
sion such as the training in specific observation, problem solv-
ing, realistic goal setting skills and rehearsal of effective be-
haviours, thereby contributing to i mprovement in, and the longer
term maintenance of, improvements in child behaviour.
Abidin, R. R. (1995). Parenting stress index: Manual (3rd ed.). Odessa,
FL: Psychological Asses sment Resources.
Achenbach, T. M., & Edelbrock, C. (1983). Manual for the child be-
havior checklist and revised child behavior profile. Burlington: Uni-
versity of Vermont, Depar tm ent of Psychiatry.
Alpern, L., & Lyons-Ruth, K. (1993). Pre-school children at social risk:
Chronicity and timing of maternal depressive symptoms and child
behaviour problems at school and at home. Development and Psy-
chopathology, 5, 371- 387. doi:10.1017/S0954579400004478
Barlow, J., Coren, E., & Stewart-Brown, S. (2009). Parent-training pro-
grammes for improving maternal psychosocial health. Cochrane Da-
tabase of Systematic Re vi e ws , 1.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable
distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic,
and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psy-
chology, 51, 1173-1182. doi:10.1037/0022-35188.8.131.523
Beauchaine, T., Webster-Stratton, C., & Reid, M. J. (2005). Mediators,
moderators, and predictors of one-year outcomes among children
treated for early-onset conduct problems: A latent growth curve
analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 371-
Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A. & Brown, G. K. (1996). Beck depression in-
ventory (2nd ed.). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
Beck, A. T., Ward, C. H., Mendelson, M., Mock, J. E., & Erbaugh, J. K.
(1961). An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General
Psychiatry, 4, 561-571. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1961.01710120031004
Bywater, T., Hutchings, J., Daley, D., Whitaker, C., Yeo, S. T., Jones,
Copyright © 2012 SciRes. 799
J. HUTCHINGS ET AL.
K., Eames, C., & Edwards, R. T. (2009). Long-term effectiveness of
a parenting intervention in Sure Start services in Wales for children
at risk of developing conduct disorder. British Journal of Psychiatry,
195, 318-324. doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.108.056531
Cummings, E. M., & Davies, P. T. (1994). Maternal depression and
child development. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 35,
Dearing, E., & Hamilton, L. C. (2005). V. contemporary advances and
classic advice for analyzing mediating and moderating variables.
Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 71,
DeGarmo, D. S., Patterson, G. R., & Forgatch, M. S. (2004). Why do
parent training intervention outcomes maintain or wane over time?
Prevention Science, 5 , 73-89.
Evans, J., Williams, J. M. G, O’Loughlin, S., & Howells, K. (1992).
Autobiographical memory and problem solving strategies of parasui-
cide patients. P sy ch ol og ic al Me di ci ne, 22, 399-405.
Eyberg, S. M., & Matarazzo, R. G. (1980). Training parents as thera-
pists: A comparison between individual parent-child interaction
training and parent group didactic training. Journal of Clinical Psy-
chology, 36, 492-498. doi:10.1002/jclp.6120360218
Eyberg, S. M., & Robinson, E. A. (1981). Dyadic parent-child interact-
tion coding system. Seattle, WA: Parenting Clin ic, Univ ersit y of Wash-
Ferster, C. B. (1973). A functional analysis of depression. American Psy-
chologist, 28, 857-870. doi:10.1037/h0035605
Field, T. (1995a). Infants of depressed mothers. Infant Behaviour and
Development, 18, 1-13. doi:10.1016/0163-6383(95)90003-9
Field, T. (1995b). Psychologically depressed patients. In: M. H. Born-
stein (Ed.). Handbook of parenting, vol.4: Applied and practical par-
enting. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Forehand, R., Furey, W. M., & McMahon, R. J. (1984). The role of
maternal distress in a parent training programme. Behaviour Therapy,
11, 488-502. doi:10.1016/S0005-7894(80)80065-7
Gardner, F., Shaw, D. S., Dishion, T. J., Burton, J., & Supplee, L.
(2007). Randomized prevention trial for early conduct problems: Ef-
fects on proactive parenting and links to toddler disruptive behavior.
Journal of Family Psychology, 2 1, 398-406.
Gardner, F., Hutchings, J., & Bywater, T. (2010). Who benefits and
how does it work? Moderators and mediators of outcome in an effec-
tiveness trial of a parenting interventions in multiple ‘Sure Start’ ser-
vices. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 39, 568-
Goodman, S. H., Rouse, M. H., Connell, A. M., Broth, M. R., Hall, C.
M., & Heyward, D. (2011). Maternal depression and child psycho-
pathology: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Child & Family Psy-
chology Review, 14, 1-27. doi:10.1007/s10567-010-0080-1
Gross, H. E., Shaw, D. S., & Moilanen, K. L. (2008). Reciprocal asso-
ciations between boys’ externalizing problems and mothers’ depress-
sive symptoms. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36, 693-709.
Hinshaw, S. P. (2002). Intervention research, theoretical mechanisms,
and causal processes related to externalizing behaviour patterns. De-
velopment and Psychopathology, 14, 789-818.
Hutchings, J. (1996). Evaluating a behaviourally based parent training
group: Outcomes for parents, children and health visitors. Behav-
ioural and Cognitive Psyc hot her apy , 24, 150-171.
Hutchings, J., Smith, M., & Gilbert, H. (2000). The Parent-Child Auto-
biographical Memory Test (PCAMT). Identifying potential deficits in
maternal observation style. Spotlight No. 43, Cardiff: Wales Office
for Research and Development (WORD).
Hutchings, J., Lane, E., & Kelly, J. (2004). Comparison of two treat-
ments for children with severely disruptive behaviours: A four-year
follow-up. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 32, 15-30.
Hutchings, J., Gardner, F., & Lane, E. (2005). Chapter 5: Making evi-
dence-based interventions work. In: C. Sutton, D. Utting, & D. Far-
rington (Eds.), Support from the start: Working with young children
and their families to reduce the risks of crime and anti-social behav-
iour. Nottingham: Department for Education and Skills.
Hutchings, J., Nash, S., Williams, J. M. G., & Nightingale, D. (1998).
Parental autobiographical memory: Is this a helpful clinical measure
in behavioural child management? British Journal of Clinical Psy-
chology, 37, 303-312. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8260.1998.tb01387.x
Hutchings, J., Eade, J., Jones, K. & Bywater, T. (2004) Protocol of
measures for health foundation funded programme, “Evaluation of
Webster-Stratton group parenting programme with parents of at-risk
preschool children in Sure Start Centres across Wales”. Bangor,
Wales: Bangor University.
Hutchings, J., Appleton, P., Smith, M., Lane, E., & Nash, S. (2002).
Evaluation of two treatments for children with severe behaviour
problems: Child behaviour and maternal mental health outcomes.
Behavioural and Cognitive Psych oth era py, 30, 279-295.
Hutchings, J., Bywater, T., Williams, M. E., Whitaker, C. J. & Lane, E.
(2011). The extended school aged incredible years parent programme.
Child and Adolescent Mental Hea lth , 16, 136-143.
Hutchings, J., Bywater, T., Daley, D., Gardner, F., Whitaker, C. J.,
Jones, K., Eames, C., & Edwards, R. T. (2007). Parenting interven-
tion in sure start services for children at risk of developing conduct
disorder: Pragmatic randomized controlled trial. British Medical
Journal, 334, 678-685. doi:10.1136/bmj.39126.620799.55
Laurenceau, J.-P., Hayes, A. M., & Feld man, G. C. (2007). Some meth-
odological and statistical issues in the study of change processes in
psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology Review, 27, 682-695.
McMahon, R. J., & Frick, P. J. (2005). Evidence-based assessment of
conduct problems in children and adolescents. Journal of Clinical
Child & Adolescent Psychology, 34, 477-505.
Mensah, F. K. & Kiernan, K. E. (2010). Parents’ mental health and
children’s cognitive and social development. Social Psychiatry and
Psychiatric Epidemiology, 45, 1023-1035.
Meunier, L. J. (2007). Maternal depressive symptoms and parenting
behavior: child behaviour as an activator of maternal responsiveness.
Ph.D. Thesis, Austin: University of Texas.
Patterson, G. R. (1982). Coercive family process. Eugene, OR: Castalia.
Pollock, L. R., & Williams, J. M. G. (2001). Effective problem solving
in suicide attempters depends on specific autobiographical recall.
Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 31, 386-396.
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for es-
timating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Re-
search Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717-731.
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strate-
gies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator
models. Beha vior Res earc h M etho ds, 40, 879-891.
Robinson, E. A., Eyberg, S. M., & Ross, A. W. (1980). The standardi-
zation of an inventory of child conduct problem behaviors. Journal
of Clinical Child Psychology, 9 , 22-29.
Rutter, M. (1996). Connections between child and adult psychopa-
thology. European C hil d a nd Adolescent Psychiatry, 5, 4-7.
Seligman, M. E. P. (1975). Helplessness: On depression, development
and death. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
Shaw, D. S., Connell, A., Dishion, T. J., Wilson, M. N., & Gardner, F.
(2009). Improvements in maternal depression as a mediator of inter-
vention effects on early childhood problem behavior. Development
and Psychopathology, 21, 417-439.
Sheppard, M. (1994). Childcare, social support and maternal depression:
A review and application of findings. British Journal of Social Work,
Copyright © 2012 SciRes.
J. HUTCHINGS ET AL.
Copyright © 2012 SciRes. 801
Sheppard, M. (1997). Social work practice in child and family care: A
study of maternal depression. British Journal of Social Work, 27,
Sheppard, M. (2009). Social support use as a parental coping strategy:
Its impact on outcome of child and parenting problems—A six-
month follow-up. British Journ al of Social Work, 3 9 , 1427-1446.
Silberg, J., & Rutter, M. (2002). Nature-nurture interplay in the risks
associated with parental depression. In S. H. Goodman & I. H. Gotlib
(Eds.), Children of depressed parents: Mechanisms of risk and im-
plications for treatment (pp. 13-36). Washington, DC: American Psy-
chological Association. doi:10.1037/10449-001
van Vreeswijk, D. F., & de Wilde, E. J. (2004). Autobiographical
memory specificity, psychopathology, depressed mood and the use
of the Autobiographical Memory Test: A meta-analysis. Behaviour
Research and Therapy, 42, 731-743.
Wahler, R. G., & Dumas, J. E. (1989). Attentional problems in dys-
functional mother-child interactions: An interbehavioral model. Psy-
chological Bulletin, 1 0 5 , 116-130. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.105.1.116
Wahler, R. G., & Sansbury, L. E. (1990). The monitoring skills of
troubled mothers: Their problems in defining child deviance. Journal
of Abnormal Child Psychology, 18, 577-589.
Webster-Stratton, C. (1985). Mother perceptions and mother-child in-
teractions: Comparison of a clinic-referred and non-clinic group.
Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 14, 334-339.
Webster-Stratton, C., & Hammond, M. (1988). Maternal depression
and its relationship to life stress, perceptions of child behaviour prob-
lems, parenting behaviours and child conduct problems. Journal of
Abnormal and Clinical Psychology, 16, 31-35.
Webster-Stratton, C., & Herbert, M. (1994). Troubled families: Prob-
lem children. Chichester: Wiley.
Webster-Stratton, C., & Spitzer, A. (1996). Parenting a young child
with conduct problems: New insights using qualitative methods. Ad-
vances in Clinical Child Psychology , 18, 1-62.
Webster-Stratton, C., & Hammond, M. (1998). Conduct problems and
level of social competence in head start children: Prevalence, perva-
siveness, and associated risk factors. Clinical Child and Family Psy-
chology Review, 1, 101-124. doi:10.1023/A:1021835728803
Webster-Stratton, C., & Hancock, L. (1998). Parent training for young
children with conduct problems: Content, methods, and therapeutic
process. In: C. E. Schaefer, (Ed.). Handbook of parent training. New
Webster-Stratton, C., & Lindsay, D. W. (1999). Social competence and
conduct problems in young children: Issues in assessment. Journal of
Clinical Child Psychology, 28, 25-43.
Williams, J. M. G. (1996). Depression and the specificity of autobio-
graphical memory. In: D. C. Rubin (Ed.) Remembering our past:
Studies in autobiographical memory. Cambridge: Cambridge Uni-
Williams, J. M. G., Barnhofer, T., Crane, C., Herman, D., Raes, F.,
Watkins, E., & Dalgeish, T. (2007). Autobiographical memory speci-
ficity and emot ional disorder. Pyshcological Bulletin, 133, 122-148.
Home | About SCIRP | Sitemap | Contact Us
Copyright ? 2006-2013 Scientific Research Publishing Inc. All rights reserved.