Paper Menu >>
Journal Menu >>
Journal of Minerals & Materials Characterization & Engineering, Vol. 8, No.7, pp 569-581, 2009
jmmce.org Printed in the USA. All rights reserved
Evaluation for the Beneficiability of Yellow Silica Sands f rom the Overburden
of Lignite Mine situated in Rajpardi district of Gujarat, India
M. Sundararajan*, S. Ramaswamy and P. Raghavan
National Institute for Interdisciplinary Science and Technology formerly Regional Research
Laboratory, (Council of Scientific and Industrial Research) Trivandrum – 695019, India
*Corresponding Author: firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com
Phone: 0091-471-2515285 / 2515250
A representative feed sample of Yellow sand was wet-sieved in order to recover the desired
fractions for glass making. The mass percentage of (–600 +300)
m and (–300 +125)
fraction was found to be 44.2 and 55.8% (ratio 1:2.26).Hence, this ratio which satisfies the size
specifications for glass making sand, was maintained for all the down stream processing studies.
The chemical analysis of the ‘wet sieved desired fractions for Yellow sand’ (WSDFy) i.e.,
mixture of –600 +300
m and –300 +125
m fractions, showed that the material does not satisfy
IS specifications since it still contains 0.41% iron. WSDFy analysed 95.8% silica, 0.41% Fe2O3,
0.25% TiO2 and 0.3% Al2O3. In order to further value add WSDFy, the same was subjected to
attrition followed by magnetic separation. Tests at optimum conditions gave a non-magnetic
fraction (sand product) which analysed 98.5% silica with 0.08% Fe2O3, 0.05% TiO2 and 0.2%
LOI. This is found matching with IS specifications for Grade III sand only.
KEY WORDS: Yellow silica sand, Beneficiation, XRD, SEM, Magnetic separation.
Silica bearing rocks and minerals such as quartz, quartzite, silica sand together with other
varieties of silica like agate, amethyst, jasper, flint etc. are used in a host of industries such as
glass, ceramics, foundries, ferro-alloys, abrasives, refractories, ornamentation etc. One of the
570 M. Sundararajan, S. Ramaswamy and P. Raghavan Vol.8, No.7
first to use silica sand is the glass industry. At least 4000 years ago, long before iron was
smelted; glass-making was already a known craft. The oldest known specimens of glass was
obtained from Babylon (2600 B. C.) and from Egypt (2500 B. C.). It could be conclusively
proved that the glass-making was well established in these countries by around 1500 B. C. [1-4].
Silicon, the main constituent of silica does not occur in free state. But silicon compounds are
abundantly available and constitute about 28% of the earth’s crust. The range of silica raw
materials occurring in nature is quite extensive. The silica, SiO2, occurs in different forms such as
quartz, (crystalline); chalcedony, agate, flint and jasper (crptocrystalline), and opal (hydrous
form); sandstone (sedimentary deposit composed of small grains of quartz); quartzite
(metamorphosed derivative of sandstone) and silica sand (weathered sandstone or quartzite
enriched in silica). The silica sand is an assemblage of individual silica grains in the size range
up to 2mm. Sand can be formed in nature by natural weathering of sandstone and quartzite or
mechanically by crushing a sandstone /quartzite or by a process of flotation whereby the various
constituents in a pegmatite or kaolin mixture are separated.
The occurrence of silica sand in world is widespread and extensive. Good quality silica sand
reserves are situated in UK, Germany, Belgium, France, Brazil etc. Silica sand is available
almost in all the states of India. Important deposits are in Andhra Pradesh, Bihar, Goa, Gujarat,
Haryana, Karnataka, Kerala, Madya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu, Uttar Pradesh etc. Haryana
is the leading producer followed by UP and Maharashtra. Silica sand also occurs in association
with clays and quite often as admixture with siliceous or lignitic overburden.
The uses of silica sand depend on its mineralogy, chemistry and physical properties. It is mainly
used for making glass and glass fibre, silicon carbide, sodium silicate, Portland cement, silicon
alloys and metals, filter media in water treatment, sand paper and also for foundry sand,
hydraulic fracturing, sand blasting, paint and a host of other applications. A major portion of
silica sand produced is consumed by glass industry. Important types of glasses made are sheet,
flat, bottle, wired and figured, vacuum, laboratory, fiber, shell, flint, ophthalmic, beads etc.
There exist both physical and chemical specifications for each use. American Ceramic Society
and US Bureau of Standards also give detailed chemical specifications for silica sand for making
different types of glasses. After glass, perhaps, maximum standardization has been made for
foundry applications. Silica sand is used in both foundry cores and moulds because of its
resistance to thermal shocks. Physical properties of the sand is far more important here than the
chemical. Silica content of 85% is used in iron castings while for steel foundries it should be
minimum 95%. Silica particle size distribution and grain shape are very important for foundry
Impurities usually present in the silica sand are free and coated iron oxides, clay, titania and
smaller amounts of sodium, potassium and calcium minerals. The iron, being the most
detrimental impurity, can be reduced by a number of physical, physico-chemical or chemical
Vol.8, No.7 Evaluation for the Beneficiability of Yellow Silica Sands 571
methods, the most appropriate method depends on the mineralogical forms and distribution of
iron in the ore [5-8]. Upgrading of silica sand requires partial removal of iron, and other minerals
which are detrimental to its end use. While much of the liberated impurities can be reduced or
removed by physical operations such as size separation (screening), gravity separation (spiral
concentration), magnetic separation etc., some times, physico-chemical (flotation) or even
chemical methods (leaching etc.) are to be adopted for the effective removal of iron which may
be in intimate association with the mineral quite often superficially. The aim of the investigation
is to adopt simple, cost effective as well as environment-friendly processes and operations so
that even a small/medium level entrepreneur can set up a beneficiation plant without much
capital investment. So it was also decided to employ sieving (screening) and other physical
operations as far as possible without going for chemical processing.
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
The investigation for proving the beneficiability of GMDC sands was initiated by blending the
representative samples which were collected by the supplier of the sample (M/S Gujarat Mineral
Development Corporation, Ahmedabad, India). The sand is the overburden of a lignite mine
situated in the Rajpardi district of Gujarat. Each sample was prepared by thoroughly blending the
material by ‘centre displacement method’ so as to obtain apparently a homogenous material. The
100 kgs of the sand was heaped at one spot and then the entire material was heaped on a second
spot by shovelling (thus displacing the centre). This is repeated for 10 times (five heaps at each
spot). By this, it is assumed that uniformity is achieved.
Standard wet chemical methods supported by instrumental analysis were adopted for
determining the chemical constituents. The samples were analyzed for silica, alumina, loss on
ignition and oxides of iron, titanium, calcium, sodium and potassium. Silica was estimated
gravimetrically by volatilizing with hydrofluoric acid, alumina by complexometric (indirect
EDTA) titration, iron and titanium by spectrophotometry and calcium, sodium and potassium by
X-ray diffraction (XRD) of the powder sample provides one of the easiest and semi quantitative
methods of identifying the minerals present in clays. The powder XRD patterns were obtained on
a diffractometer (Philips analytical) using Cu Kα radiation operating at 40KV and 20mA on a
diffraction range 5-600 (2θ). Quartz minerals were observed using scanning electron microscope
(SEM) for morphological studies. The grains were mounted on a SEM brass stub. The mounted
quartz grains were coated with gold in a vacuum evaporator while the sample was being slowly
rotated. Usually 15-20 grains were studied in detail and typical micrographs were taken by using
JEOL JSM-5800 scanning electron microscope. The relative densities and relevant bulk densities
of the feed and various intermediates and final products were determined by standard methods.
572 M. Sundararajan, S. Ramaswamy and P. Raghavan Vol.8, No.7
3. RESULT AND DISCUSSION
The bulk raw sample was blended to achieve maximum homogeneity. A small amount of Yellow
sand sample was drawn from the blended bulk for determining their chemical constituents,
mineral contents and physical properties. The presence of quartz, kaolinite, anatase and rutile
was shown in the XRD pattern of the raw sample (Fig.1).
Q-Quartz, K- Kaolinite, A-Anatase, R- Rutile
Figure 1. XRD pattern of Yellow silica sand.
SEM studies reveal that the quartz grains are sub rounded marked by numerous surface pits, etch
v’marks, irregular blocks. Weathered, triangular marks and fractured solution pits (Fig. 2) were
created by mechanical abrasion and chemical processes.
Vol.8, No.7 Evaluation for the Beneficiability of Yellow Silica Sands 573
a) Grains are sub rounded b) Sub-angular grain with conchoidal fracture.
c) Weathered Quartz (d) Grain showing triangular marks and
impact marks and etch v’s.
e) Fractured Quartz
Figure 2 Scanning Electron Micrographs of Yellow silica sand.
574 M. Sundararajan, S. Ramaswamy and P. Raghavan Vol.8, No.7
Chemical analysis was done initially to select the sample(s) based on their silica content before
starting the beneficiation experiments (Table 1).
Table 1. Chemical analysis of raw Yellow silica sand.
Constituents Wt, %
Again at each stage of processing, the products were analyzed for the chemical constituents so
that the extent of value addition or suitability of the beneficiation product with respect to
standard specifications could be evaluated. The silica value of the raw yellow sand is 95.5%
which is better than the White sand. The sample contained aluminium (corresponding to clay)
again lesser than that of White sand. Similarly, iron, titania and LOI values were also lower than
the White one. However, the yield of the desired fraction (DF -600 +125m) is only 72.6%
which is lower than the White sand. The sample cannot directly be used for any value added
3.2 Laboratory Beneficiation Studies
Laboratory investigation studies were initiated after the completion of characterisation studies on
the representative feed sample. BIS has put forth specifications for four grades of silica sand for
glass making .The best grade known as Special grade should contain minimum 99% silica with
maximum permissible level of 0.02% Fe2O3 and 0.1% TiO2 for a size fraction in between 600
and 125m. Others are Grade I, II or III in the decreasing order of purity.
3.2.1. Wet sieving and mixing of desired fractions (DF)
Wet sieving was carried out in tune with the requirements for glass making sand and hence the
sieves selected were 1000, 600, 300 and 125m. The data are given in Table 2.
Vol.8, No.7 Evaluation for the Beneficiability of Yellow Silica Sands 575
Table 2. Wet sieve analysis of Yellow raw silica sand sample and chemical characterization of
‘wet-sieved desired fractions’ (WSDFy).
Sieve Size, %Wt.
-1000, +600 16.5
-600, +300 32.1
-300, +125 40.5
%Wt. SiO2 Fe2O3 TiO2 Al2O3 Na2O K2O CaO LOI
WSDFy 72.6 95.8 0.41 0.25 0.3 0.007 0.004 0.04 0.33
The fraction above 600m is coarse grits, which is about 21.9% of the feed sample and was
removed since it is not suitable for glass making (This may be used for land filling). Similarly,
the fraction below 125m (~5.5% of feed sample) which contains mostly kaolin (clay mineral) is
also rejected. The weight fraction of –600, +125m ‘cut’ which is about 72.6% is the ‘Desired
Fraction’ (DFy) as per the size specification. We shall denote it as ‘WSDFy’ since it is wet-
sieved. In WSDFy, while -600, +300m is 44.2%, the other fraction (-300, +125m) is 55.8%
which satisfies the IS specifications. Though the mass proportion as per the specification is
satisfied, the chemical analysis (Table 2) showed that the material is not suitable for any glass
making; hence WSDFy was subjected to further processing.
Since the combined iron was found to be mainly as coating on the surface of the sand grains, it
was decided to go for attrition followed by magnetic separation. Attrition tests carried out in
Netzsch mill, PE 075, which is a vertical cylindrical attritor jar fitted with a specially designed
agitator. The mill was charged with 1.24 Kgs. of the attrition medium, viz., fused ceramic beads
of 1-1.3 mm size and later on the material was added to the mill in slurry form. The agitator was
switched on and was brought to the required rpm. The mill has got external cooling system for
removing the heat generated during the attrition process. After completion of the set time, the
total charge was taken out and the attrition media was separated from the slurry by sieving.
For the tests with Yellow silica sand, the agitator rpm was kept at 1150 so as to generate a small
vortex at the centre of the attritor jar. Two variables were tried: ‘slurry solid content’ and the
‘attrition time’. Solid loading was varied from 10 to 60%. Towards 55%, externally circulated
cooling water of the attritor was getting heated up and at 60%, the contents did not move at all
576 M. Sundararajan, S. Ramaswamy and P. Raghavan Vol.8, No.7
due to high viscosity. Hence the optimum solid loading has been taken as 50%. Data are
presented in Table 3.
Table 3. Influence of solid loading on attrition impurity liberation and removal.
Solid loading, Wt% Non-magnetic product
%SiO2 %Fe2O3 %TiO2
15 95.6 0.290 0.071
35 95.9 0.271 0.069
45 96.1 0.263 0.063
50 96.7 0.210 0.052
55 96.6 0.213 0.056 – Cooling water
getting heated up
60 Could not subject to attrition due to infinite viscosity
Fixed conditions: Media -1.24 Kg., Size-1-1.3mm fused ceramic beads;
Attrition time –10minutes, agitator rpm-1150
Magnetic separation : Magnetic field (equivalent current in Amp.) – 3.2
Medium : Iron balls (diameter of 6.3 mm) -1.248 Kg.
(Total slurry volume – 250 ml)
Table 4. Influence of attrition time on impurity liberation and removal.
Attrition time, minute’s Non-magnetic product
%SiO2 %Fe2O3 %TiO2
5 96.0 0.290 0.040
10 96.7 0.210 0.052
15 96.7 0.209 0.050
20 97.8 0.210 0.052
30 97.8 0.207 0.053
Fixed conditions: Media -1.24 Kg., Size-1-1.3mm fused ceramic beads;
% Solids for attrition –50; agitator rpm-1150
Magnetic separation: Magnetic field (equivalent current in Amp.) – 3.2
Medium: Iron balls (diameter of 6.3 mm) -1.248 Kg.
(Total slurry volume – 250 ml)
The attrition media was removed by sieving the product slurry using a 600m sieve. No sand
was found along with the recovered media. The whole slurry was passed through a 125m sieve
so as to remove the liberated iron impurities along with the over-ground (fine) sand. The
Vol.8, No.7 Evaluation for the Beneficiability of Yellow Silica Sands 577
attrition resulted in size reduction of sand and attrition medium. The particle size distribution
before and after attrition is presented in Table 5.
Table 5. Particle size distribution before and after attrition.
Sieve Size, m %Wt.
-600, +300 44.2 43.0
-300, +125 55.8 53.8
-125 Nil 03.2
It could be seen that about 3.2% of –125m fraction was generated (w.r.t. WSDFy) which was
removed by screening through 125 micron screen. The mass distribution between desired
fractions (i.e., -600, +300 and–180, +125m) after attrition is slightly changed, however it does
not affect the specifications.
As already stated above, attrition operation generates a sand fraction of about 3.2% below
125m w.r.t. WSDFy. This is considered to be a loss since fraction below this size cannot be
used for glass making. This is equivalent to 2.3% w.r.t. the raw sand sample. This includes the
liberated iron and titanium minerals which is, relatively, a very small quantity. The grinding
media loss has been estimated to be about 1.5%.
3.2.3. Magnetic separation
A wet high intensity magnetic separator (WHIMS) which can generate an optimum magnetic
field of 1.8 Tesla (18000 Gauss) at a maximum input current of ~3.2 Ampere was used for
magnetic separation. The magnetic separation, which is integral with the attrition, was carried
out using a Carpco machine which was operated on batch basis. The ‘canister’ (separating
chamber) of the magnet was filled with the medium which, in the present case, is iron balls
(1.248 Kg.) of about 6.3 mm in diameter (small size) and the magnetic field was generated by
switching on the current. The dry sample was spread on the top of the medium and water was
added manually and uniformly on the surface so that it wets the material and takes it through the
voids among the balls. The water equivalent to 25% slurry was added initially. The liberated
magnetic particles were caught by the iron balls and the sand slurry flows through the medium
down to the collection pot unaffected by the field. Plain water was added into canister over the
balls as wash water in order to dislodge the sand particles entrapped among the balls. The
washings were collected along with the non-magnetics, i.e., product yellow sand. After the
578 M. Sundararajan, S. Ramaswamy and P. Raghavan Vol.8, No.7
product sand was collected, the magnetic field was switched off and the canister was flushed
with water in order to dislodge the magnetics (iron impurities) from the medium. Later on, the
balls were taken out and again washed to collect the final traces of the sticking iron particles.
Both the materials were dried and weighed.
While WSDFy after attrition and magnetic separation at optimized conditions was found to
satisfy Grade III specification for glass making, the iron content could not be reduced below
0.08%. Salient results of tests such as LOI and other chemical assays and size grading for the
product yellow sand are given in Table 6.
Table 6. Comparison of Product Yellow sand with respect to ‘Grade III’ glass making sand.
(% by mass)
1 Loss on ignition,
2 Silica (as SiO2),
3 Iron Oxide (as
Dioxide ( as
Oxide (as MnO)
---- To pass
7 Copper Oxide
---- To pass
---- To pass
Vol.8, No.7 Evaluation for the Beneficiability of Yellow Silica Sands 579
(ii) Size grading (Table 6 continued)
Product Yellow sand IS Specifications for
Grade III Glass making sand
1 mm IS sieve Nil Nil
Retained on 600
micron IS sieve,
% by mass, Max. Nil 01.0
Passing through 600
micron IS sieve,
but retained on 300
micron IS sieve,
% by mass, Max. 43 50.0
Passing through 300
micron IS sieve,
but retained on 125
micron IS sieve,
% by mass, Min. 53.8 50.0
Passing through 125
micron IS sieve,
% by mass, Max. Nil 05.0
In comparison with BIS specifications for Grade III glass making sand, the Product of
beneficiation is ‘Grade III glass making sand’ while the coarse grit (+600 micron) can be taken
as a byproduct.
3.3 Suggested beneficiation flow sheet for Yellow silica sand
Based on the laboratory processing studies conducted on the blended raw sand sample in order to
establish the beneficiability of Yellow silica sand, a beneficiation flow sheet is suggested as
580 M. Sundararajan, S. Ramaswamy and P. Raghavan Vol.8, No.7
The overburden sand is first wet-screened using a single deck vibrating screen having a 600 m
screen. The oversize grits is collected separately to be used as a land fill while the undersize
slurry is pumped to a second stage double deck vibrating screen fitted with 300 and 125 m
screens. Both +300 and (-300 +125) fractions are taken together and this slurry after adjusting
the pulp density is sent to attrition mills. The attrited sand slurry is screened using a vibrating
screen fitted with 600 m screens in order to remove the attrition media. If required additional
water can be added at this stage. The sand slurry is then passed through 125 m vibrating screen
so as to remove the slimes which contains a major portion of the liberated iron and some broken
attrition media as well as over-milled silica sand particles. The desired fraction (-600 +125m),
after adjusting pulp density is pumped to wet high intensity magnetic separators to remove the
remaining iron impurities. The non-magnetic slurry containing the desired silica sand fraction is
collected and pumped to the hydrocyclones for first stage de-watering and finally to a spiral
classifier for 2nd stage and final dewatering to obtain Grade III glass making sand as the principal
product. The coarse grits from the 1st screen can form a by-product which can be used for land
The investigation was carried out on Yellow silica sand samples in order to evaluate their
beneficiability for value addition. Initial characterization showed that the main impurities are
iron and titania minerals in the sample. The results of beneficiation studies reveal that while wet
sieving/screening removes majority of these contaminating minerals to give an intermediate
product sand, attrition and magnetic separation is required to upgrade the same to grade III glass
making sand. Coarse grits, (+600m) can be considered as a by-product which can be used for
landfill. Based on the laboratory study, beneficiation flow sheets have been suggested for the
yellow silica sand samples.
The project team is grateful to the sponsors, Gujarat Mineral Development Corporation Science
& Research Centre, Ahmedabad for financial support for this study. They are particularly
thankful to Mr. S.B. Vora who has shown keen interest in this work. The guidance and advice
received from Shri. CPS Nair, Project Advisor is gratefully acknowledged. Finally, we thank the
Director, NIIST (RRL), Trivandrum for his support for execution of the project.
1. Indian Bureau of Mines, Nagpur, , 1993, Quartz and Silica Sand; Bulletin No. 25
2. Directorate of Mining and Geology, Kerala; 1998. “Report on silica sand”
Vol.8, No.7 Evaluation for the Beneficiability of Yellow Silica Sands 581
3. Bureau of Indian Standards, 1977. IS specification for standard silica sand for raw
material testing in foundries, IS:3018-1977, Indian Standard Institution, New Delhi
4. Bureau of Indian Standards, 1980. IS specification for glass making sands, IS:488-1980,
Indian Standard Institution, New Delhi
5. Ay, N., Arica, E, 2000. “Refining Istanbul’s silica sand”, www.Ceramicbulletin.org,
6. Farmer, A.D., Collings, A.F., Jameson, G.J., 2000. The application of power ultrasound
to the surface cleaning of silica and heavy mineral sands, Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 7,
7. Axiarchaou, M., Panias, D., Douni, I., Paspaliaris, I., Kontopoulos, A., 1997. Removal of
iron from silica sand by leaching with oxalic acid, Hydrometallurgy, 46, pp.215-227
8. Wills, B. A. 1998. Mineral processing Technology. Pergamon Press, New York