Open Journal of Air Pollution
Vol.06 No.04(2017), Article ID:80544,14 pages
10.4236/ojap.2017.64011

The Influence of Gaseous Pollutants on Silver Artifacts Tarnishing

Yussri Salem

Conservation Department, Faculty of Archaeology, South Valley University, Qena, Egypt

Copyright © 2017 by author and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY 4.0).

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Received: September 20, 2017; Accepted: November 21, 2017; Published: November 24, 2017

ABSTRACT

The present work investigated the effect of the common gaseous pollutants on silver artifacts corrosion. The study will be carried out on manufactured coupons of silver alloy (91 silver, 9 copper) which have chemical composition similar to ancient Egyptian silver artifacts. These coupons will be exposed to gaseous pollutants of each individual gas; such as Sulfur dioxide, Nitrogen dioxide, Carbon dioxide, Hydrogen sulfide and Chlorine. The exposure period will be four weeks in a climate chamber with gas concentration 10 PPM. After the test Examinations by SEM and PM were used to evaluate the effect of each gas and description the morphology of the corrosion layers. The results revealed that all gases reacted with the surface except carbon dioxide. The formed tarnishing layers varied in coverage and density rate. Corrosion products are analyzed by XRD and the results revealed Ag2S, AgCl, Ag2SO4 and Ag2O as corrosion products.

Keywords:

Silver, Artifacts, Atmospheric Corrosion, Gaseous Pollutants

1. Introduction

Archaeological silver and its alloys have relatively high resistance to corrosion products in the atmospheric environment compared to copper and iron objects. But in the presence of humidity and gaseous pollutants―special Sulphur containing pollutants―Silver is susceptible to the tarnishing and corrosion products will be formed. Many corrosion products such as Ag2S, Ag2SO4, AgCl, have been identified on silver objects either in museum environment (displayed in cabinets and stored in depositories) or excavated from the burial environment. Silver objects corrosion in the atmospheric environmental attributed to the water layers on the surface which provide the reaction of the gaseous pollutants such as chloride anions, sulphates, carbonates and Sulphides with metallic surface and lead to the metal dissolution [1] .

Among the family of ancient metals, the fewest studies on the laboratory and field exposure of the gaseous pollutants were presented to silver. Previous lab exposure tests often focused on silver tarnish due to Sulphur containing pollutants [2] - [7] . These studies have been agreed in their results which can be summarized in the formation of silver tarnish as black layer consisting of Ag2S as major corrosion product and Ag2SO4 in a negligible quantity. Few lab exposure studies have been presented to impact other gaseous pollutants such as Cl, NO2, and CO2, but the results were different and varied. The differences were as follow.

Results of Previous studies indicated that nitrogen dioxide is not considered a corrosion factor of silver because silver does not react with it, but it only acts as an accelerated factor of silver tarnish with other gases [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] even though Previous study found silver nitrate Ag2NO3 as corrosion products on exposed silver to 1.2 ppm NO2 for 40 hours [2] .

Also Ag2SO4 as corrosion product was observed on silver coupons in field exposure [13] although the studies indicated that Silver sulfate (Ag2SO4) forms only in artificially high levels of sulfur dioxide [14] [15] .

Silver is sensitive to chloride (Cl) and silver chloride will be formed as a result of the reaction [10] [11] [12] [15] [16] [17] . Also this does not agree with results revealed that silver chloride compound was not identified on surface film of silver coupons after the exposure in an ASTM B117 salt spray chamber [18] and this compatibility with previous studies mentioned that silver does not react directly with chlorine gas and the presence of silver chloride as corrosion product due to burial in a chloride rich environment [19] [20] .

The laboratory-exposure studies of the effect of CO2 gas on silver are very few, although Ag2CO3 is distinguished as corrosion product of silver as result of the reaction with CO2 and although CO2 is abundant in the ambient environment of silver artifacts. So very little is known about the formation mechanism of Ag2CO3 Such as it is expected only in strong alkaline solutions [21] . Ag2CO3 product corrosion has not been detected as corrosion product on the silver artifacts. Also Ag2CO3 was identified in a recent study of field-exposure study on the silver coupons exposed to various outdoor environments and the product was detected only in one site which distinguished above the temperature inversion layer [1] .

Therefore, in this study, the effects of gases (NO2, Cl, CO2) on silver will be presented as a laboratory exposure and the results will be compared with previous studies. Also they did not take sufficient laboratory studies although they were common gaseous pollutants in outdoor and indoor atmospheric environment, also hydrogen sulfide and sulfur dioxide were chosen as main gases in silver tarnish and lead to silver sulfide which was often observed as corrosion product of silver.

2. Experimental Procedures

2.1. Coupons Preparation

Silver coupons should be similar for archaeological silver of ancient Egypt civilization, different concentrations were found in Ancient Egyptian Silver, elemental analysis of a number of Egyptian silver artefacts showed that the concentration of silver in 10 objects between 83 to 90%, and between 90 to 95% of 19 other objects [22] [23] . Also analyses of Babylonian coins from silver copper alloy were about 87% - 90% purity [21] . So that a composition of coupons was Ag 89.4% and Cu 10.5% .This concentration was not artificial available and was manufactured by alloying a mixture of silver (pieces from the pure silver) with pure copper pieces. The coupons were made by direct addition of silver and copper in a crucible Figure 1 [24] . The dimensions were (3 cm × 5 cm × 0.08 cm) Figure 2. XRF analysis used to determine the Composition.

Thin thickness of coupons about 8 m will be suitable and similar to silver artifacts thickness. most the silver artefacts were manufactured to thin sheets such as thin sheets for royal garments, hollow statues, jewellery items, funeral items, Household items of everyday life such as, spoons, jugs, cups, vessels, pots, covered wooden object, bowls and Other usages. Successive processes of hammering and ductility with the annealing on alloy rod to obtain thin thickness about 0.8 mm. Five new coupons were used for each gas test; a hole was drilled in each sample for suspension in the chamber middle [21] .

2.2. Design and Preparation of Climate Chamber Test

Climate chamber was designed according to ASTM [25] . It is made of 1000 cm

Figure 1. Manufacturing to silver coupons: (a) Pure silver pieces; (b) Shape of resulting rod after casting; (c) Cutting coupons after ductility and hammering processes.

Figure 2. Silver alloy coupons before the exposure.

diameter Perspex cylinder. The humidity was controlled gradually by the cup of saturated salt solution inside the chamber, the approximately 85% RH was obtained by a saturated solution of potassium chloride [26] and the chamber was only opened to remove coupons. Heating of the air inside the chamber is done by a cartridge heater, the air inside the chamber is continuously mixed by a fan, which was suspended from the ceiling of the chamber, the temperature and relative humidity inside the chamber are continuously measured by a data logger device [27] [28] . A few studies were presented on the silver deterioration tests inside climate chamber, these studies used two types of the deterioration factors: high relative humidity [10] [29] and gaseous pollutants in presence relative humidity [2] [25] [29] . Most studies of silver deterioration were used corrosive solutions as deterioration factors, such as BaS 5 g/l solution for 24 Hours [18] and Na2S were used as the tarnishing solution [30] [31] . Acetic acid solutions were used as simulation of emissions vapors in wooden cabinets and CuCl2 50 g/l for 20 min, and NaCl [29] were used of AgCl silver patina [19] .

2.3. The Test Gases

The gases for the test were as follows: Sulfur dioxide SO2, Nitrogen dioxide NO2, Carbon dioxide CO2, Chlorine gas Cl and Hydrogen Sulphide H2S. The gas is mixed with the present air in inside chamber. Those types were the most influence in deterioration of silver artefacts.

2.4. Test Procedures

Each five coupons were exposed to humidified air containing concentration 10 ppm of one gas only. Accelerated conditions parameters were as shown in Table 1. The values of conditions parameters were chosen after survey of 29 previous studies which included lab exposure of ancient metals family (copper, bronze, silver, steel and lead) as shown in Table 2. Their most experiments were performed at room temperature (22˚C - 25˚C), and relative humidity between 80 - 90. The other two factors such as the gases concentration and the exposure period differed from study to another.

Cylinders 99.9% concentration were used to obtain of CO2, SO2 and NO2 gases, The gas flowed from cylinder into the exposure chamber after the calculation of flow and time of the required concentration. H2S and Cl were prepared in lab, H2S prepared by the reaction of hydrochloric acid diluted with ferrous sulfide (Equation (1)) [51] and Cl prepared by the interaction of concentrated Cl with manganese dioxide (Equation (2)) [52] . According to the law of Avogadro and Lussac can be calculated Volume which the required concentration of H2S and Cl inside the chamber is occupied. Where Molecular weight (one mole) of any gas under standard conditions is occupied 22,400 ml (The molar volume, Equation (3)) [53] , and by the calculated of molecular weight to H2S Equation (4) which occupied 22,400 ml can be calculated volume of the required concentration of H2S Equation (5).

FeS + 2HCl FeCl 2 + H 2 S (1)

4HCl + MnO 2 MnCl 2 + 2H 2 O + Cl 2 (2)

1moleofagasatSTP = 22 . 4litersofagas (3)

2X1 + 32 = 34 g = 224 00 ml (4)

10 ppm ( 19 mg / m 3 ) = X (5)

Gas syringe was used to get the required volume and injected it into inside chamber Figure 3, the fan was used for mixing gases and its distribution inside the chamber.

Table 1. Conditions and procedures of the test.

Table 2. Summarizes lap exposure conditions to gaseous pollutants with ancient metals in the previous studies.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Examination of the Samples after the Test

All the coupons surfaces interacted with the gases from the first week except the exposed coupons to carbon dioxide. The reaction behavior inside the chamber and the growth rate of the tarnishing layer were similar among Cl, H2S, and NO2. The interaction began as a very thin layer on the surface and the growth of tarnishing was generally rapid then became slow. The surface appearance turned from light interference tones to a grey and, finally, black film. Also the tarnishing rate was increased with H2S, Cl, decreased with SO2, NO2 as shown in Figure 4.

The Coupons were examined after each test by Visual examination, Polarizing Microscope and Scanning Electron Microscope to identify the morphology of the formed layer and evaluate the interaction between the coupons surface and the test gases. The investigation results revealed that the formed tarnishing layer, thickness, density and coverage of the surface were differed among the test coupons as shown in Figure 5. H2S coupons recorded the highest thickness, density and coverage of the formed layer. Also H2S caused pitting in the metallic core. Cl coupons were completely covered by a uniform general dense layer of silver tarnishing. CO2 coupons revealed very weak effect of gas. Slightly tarnishing layer with green spots were observed on the surface of NO2 coupons. SO2 coupons showed the least tarnishing layer and the reaction was very slow although humidity existed, the slow reaction of SO2 with silver was mention in previous studies [35] .

3.2. The Analysis of Corrosion Products by X-Ray Diffraction and Raman Spectroscopy

The coupons were exposed to X-ray diffraction to analyze the formed patina.

Figure 3. The syringe and the method of taking the required volume from the gas resulting from the interaction.

Figure 4. The coupons after the test: (a) The coupons exposed of H2S; (b) The coupons exposed of Cl; (c) The coupons exposed of SO2; (d) The coupons exposed of NO2; (e) The coupons exposed of CO2.

This was showed many of corrosion products as in Figure 6 and Table 3.

The Raman spectrum of the tarnishing formed with H2S shows four intensive bands in the range of 80 - 274 cm−1, Apart from the bands related to silver lattice vibrations at 93 and 147 cm−1, the others can be assigned to Ag-S-Ag symmetric stretching mode in particular at 93, 188 and 243 cm−1 with a shoulder at 273 cm−1 [54] . The Raman spectrum confirmed XRD result because the bands revealed acanthite product Figure 7(a).

Figure 5. Investigation by SEM and polarizing microscope ×500 show the most important characteristics of tarnishing layer on the surface such as H2S coupons are covered by dense tarnishing layer (a1)-(a5); Cl coupons reveal a uniform and thick tarnishing layer (b1)-(b5); CO2 coupons reveal very weak effect of the gas (c1)-(c5); SO2 coupons reveal the crystal structure of product of tarnishing (d1)-(d5); Green spots on the surface of NO2 coupons (f1)-(f5).

Table 3. Corrosion products on the coupons after the test.

The Raman spectrum of Cl gas coupon presented sharp and highly intensive band at 236 cm−1, two weak bands at 145 and 349 cm−1, these beaks agreement with the main beaks of AgCl bands as in reference [54] Figure 7(b), the layer tarnishing of other gases was so slight that it was not identified by Raman.

Silver sulfide (Ag2S Acanthite): they were identified as abundant on silver artifacts. The reaction behavior between gas H2S and the silver surface to form these products explains Equations (6) and (7).

4Ag + O 2 + 2H 2 S 2Ag 2 S + 2H 2 O (6) [55] [56]

2Ag + H 2 S Ag 2 S + H 2 (7) [5]

Figure 6. XRD patterns of tarnishing layers of the coupons: (a) Tarnishing of H2S; (b) Tarnishing of Cl; (c) The coupons of CO2; (d) Tarnishing of SO2; (e) Tarnishing of NO2.

Silver chloride (AgCl Cerargyrite, chlorargyrite): In this case, the dominant theory in the interpretation of formation mechanism of chloroargyrite AgCl is the transformation of Ag2O to AgCl as Equation (8) [13] [14]

Ag 2 O + 2Cl + H 2 O 2AgCl + 2OH (8) [13]

Silver sulfite (Ag2SO4): This product was identified in a previous study as corrosion product of silver [1] and the Equations (9)-(12) were suggested for the mechanism of its formation on silver coupons surface.

2Ag + + 2OH Ag 2 O + H 2 O (9)

OH + SO 2 HSO 3 (10)

Ag 2 O + HSO 3 Ag 2 SO 3 + OH (11)

Ag 2 SO 3 Ag 2 SO 4 (12)

Silver oxide Ag2O: Silver artifacts react with oxygen either by the electrochemical reactions in the presence of humidity (Equations (13)-(15)) or by chemical reactions in the absence humidity (Equation (16)). Therefore Ag2O and AgO are formed

(a)(b)

Figure 7. Raman spectrum of tarnishing of H2S (a); tarnishing of Cl (b).

on silver artifacts surfaces.

Ag Ag + + e (13)

1 2 O 2 + H 2 O + e 2OH (14)

2Ag + + 2OH Ag 2 O + H 2 O (15)

Ag + 1 2 O 2 Ag 2 O (16)

Silver ammine nitrate (Ag(NO3)3(NO)3): previous studies of filed and lab. exposure were identified only one product (AgNO3) from nitrates anions as corrosion products on silver surface, Therefore this compound was expected of NO2 gas, but analysis showed Silver ammine nitrate (Ag(NO3)3(NO)3).

Copper Nitrate Hydroxide (Rouaite, Cu2(NO3)(OH)3): Silver and copper are the coupons alloy elements, the formation of Rouaite corrosion product is contributed to selective corrosion of copper by the interaction of cu (as the main alloying element) with NO2 gas.

4. Conclusions

Silver in the ambient atmosphere and presence humidity is susceptible to the reaction with air pollutants. The tarnishing is formed not only in the presence of Sulphur containing pollutants but also there are other gaseous such as Cl and NO2.

Except the coupons of CO2, all the test coupons were exposed to tarnishing layer which was formed on the surface as a blackish thin film caused by the reaction of the metal surface with test pollutants. But highest layer in density and tarnishing was to H2S gas.

Found

This research was founded by south valley university (Egypt).

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Dr. Mai Rifai Con. Dep. Arch. Fac. Cai. Uni, for all assistance and support, Thanks also need to go to Dr. Adel Abdelkader Chem. Dep. Sci. Fac. Sou. Val. Uni. and prof. A.A. Shakour, Air Pollution Department, National Research Center, Egypt, for their helpful to adjust the gases concentration inside the chamber test.

Cite this paper

Salem, Y. (2017) The Influence of Gaseous Pollutants on Silver Artifacts Tarnishing. Open Journal of Air Pollution, 6, 135-148. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojap.2017.64011

References

  1. 1. Sanders, C.E., Verreault, D., Frankel, G.S. and Allen, H.C. (2015) The Role of Sulfur in the Atmospheric Corrosion of Silver. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 162, 630-637. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0051512jes

  2. 2. Kim, H. (2003) Corrosion Process of Silver in Environments Containing 0.1 ppm H2S and 1.2 ppm NO2. Materials and Corrosion, 54, 243-250. https://doi.org/10.1002/maco.200390053

  3. 3. Kleber, C., Wiesinger, R., Schnller, J., Hilfrich, U., Hutter, H. and Schreiner, M. (2008) Initial Oxidation of Silver Surfaces by S2- and S4-Species. Corrosion Science, 50, 1112-1121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2007.12.001

  4. 4. Pope, D., Gibbens, H.R. and Moss, R.L. (1986) The Tarnishing of Silver at Naturally Occurring H2S and SO2 Levels. Corrosion Science, 8, 883-887.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-938X(68)80141-6

  5. 5. Graedel, T.E., Franey, J.P., Gualtieri, G.J., Kammlott, G.W. and Malm, D.L. (1985) On the Mechanism of Silver and Copper Sulfidation by Atmospheric H2S and OCS. Corrosion Science, 25, 1163-1180. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-938X(85)90060-5

  6. 6. Derdall, G. and Hyne, J.B. (1979) The Production of H2S by Hydrolysis of Entrained COS in Hydrocarbon Liquids. Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 57, 112-114.https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.5450570119

  7. 7. Lin, H. and Frankel, G.S. (2013) Accelerated Atmospheric Corrosion Testing of Ag. Corros., 69, 1060-1072. https://doi.org/10.5006/0926

  8. 8. Guinement, J. and Fiaud, C. (1986) Laboratory Study of the Reaction of Silver and Copper with Some Atmospheric Pollutants. Proceedings of the 13th ICEC Conference, Pattaya, 28-29 December 2017, 383-390.

  9. 9. Abbott, W.H. (1987) The Development and Performance Characteristics of Mixed Flowing Gas Test Environments. IEEE Transactions on Components, Hybrids, and Manufacturing Technology, 11, 22-35.

  10. 10. Graedel, T.E. (1992) Corrosion Mechanisms for Silver Exposed to the Atmosphere. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 139, 1963-1970. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.2221162

  11. 11. Abbott, W.H. (1974) Effects of Industrial Air Pollutants on Electrical Contact Materials. IEEE Transactions on Parts, Hybrids, and Packaging, 10, 24-27. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPHP.1974.1134830

  12. 12. Myers, M. (2009) Overview of the Use of Silver in Connector Applications. Technical Paper, Interconnection & Process Technology Tyco Electronics, Harrisburg, PA, 503-516.

  13. 13. Wan, Y., Wang, X., Wang, X., Li, Y., Sun, H. and Zhang, K. (2015) Determination and Generation of the Corrosion Compounds on Silver Exposed to the Atmospheres. International Journal of Electrochemical Science, 10, 2336-2354.

  14. 14. Abbott, W.H. (1968) The Influence of Environment on Tarnishing Reactions. Proceedings of the 4th ICEC Conference, Paris, 1968, 35-39.

  15. 15. Rice, D., Peterson, P., Rigby, E., Phipps, P., Cappell, R. and Tremoureaux, R. (1981) Atmospheric Corrosion of Copper and Silver. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 128, 275-284. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.2127403

  16. 16. Liang, D., Allen, H.C., Frankel, G.S., Chen, Z.Y., Kelly, R.G., Wu, Y. and Wyslouzil, B.E. (2010) Effects of Sodium Chloride Particles, Ozone, UV, and Relative Humidity on Atmospheric Corrosion of Silver. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 157, 146-156. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.3310812

  17. 17. Ingo, G.M., Angelini, E., Riccucci, C., de Caro, T., Mezzi, A., Faraldi, F., Caschera, D., Giuliani, C. and Di Carlo, G. (2015) Indoor Environmental Corrosion of Ag-Based Alloys in the Egyptian Museum (Cairo, Egypt). Applied Surface Science, 326, 222-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.11.135

  18. 18. Wan, Y., Macha, E.N. and Kelly, R.G. (2012) Modification of ASTM B117 Salt Spray Corrosion Test and Its Correlation to Field Measurements of Silver Corrosion. Corrosion, 68. https://doi.org/10.5006/1.3693699

  19. 19. Novakovic, J., Georgiza, E. and Vassiliou, P. (2013) Nano-Alumina Modified Acrylic Coatings for Silver Protection. School of Chemical Engineering, NTUA, Athens, 23-25.

  20. 20. Al-Saad, Z. and Bani Hani, M. (2007) Corrosion Behavior and Preservation of Islamic Silver Alloy Coins.

  21. 21. Vassilio, P. and Gouda, V. (2013) Ancient Silver Artefacts: Corrosion Processes and Preservation Strategies. Corrosion and Conservation of Cultural Heritage Metallic Artefacts. In: European Federation of Corrosion (EFC) Series, Woodhead Publishing Limited and CRC Press, Oxford, 213-235. https://doi.org/10.1533/9781782421573.3.213

  22. 22. Gale, N.H. and Stos-Gale, Z.A. (1981) Ancient Egyptian Silver. The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, 67, 103-115. https://doi.org/10.2307/3856605

  23. 23. Lucas, A. (2011) Ancient Egyptian Materials and Industries. 4th Edition, Dover Publications, London.

  24. 24. Abu-Baker, A.N., MacLeod, I.D., Sloggett, R. and Taylor, R. (2013) A Comparative Study of Salicylaldoxime, Cysteine and Benzotriazole as Inhibitors for the Active Chloride-Based Corrosion of Copper and Bronze Artifacts. European Scientific Journal, 9, 1857-7881.

  25. 25. ASTM D5116 (1997) Standard Guide for Small-Scale Environmental Chamber Determinations of Organic Emissions from Indoor Materials/Products.

  26. 26. Young, J.F. (1967) Humidity Control in the Laboratory Using Salt Solutions—A Review. Journal of Applied Chemistry, 17, 241-245. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.5010170901

  27. 27. Kim, M.N., Yu, H.S. and Lee, S.E. (2003) A Small Chamber Test and Oddy Test on Medium Density Fiberboard Grade (E0, E1). Indoor Air Quality in Museums and Historic Properties University of East Anglia, Norwich.

  28. 28. Kim, S., Kim, J.A., An, J.Y., Kim, H.J., Kim, S.D. and Park, J.C. (2007) TVOC and Formaldehyde Emission Behaviors from Flooring Materials Bonded with Environmental-Friendly MF/PVAc Hybrid Resins. Indoor Air, 17, 404-415. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0668.2007.00488.x

  29. 29. Wiesinger, R., Martina, I., Kleber, C. and Schreiner, M. (2013) Influence of Relative Humidity and Ozone on Atmospheric Silver Corrosion. Corrosion Science, 77, 69-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2013.07.028

  30. 30. Bernard, M.C., Dauvergne, E., Evesque, M., Keddam, M. and Takenouti, H. (2005) Reduction of Silver Tarnishing and Protection against Subsequent Corrosion. Corrosion Science, 47, 663-679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2013.07.028

  31. 31. Lin, H., Frankel, G.S. and Abbott, W.H. (2013) Analysis of Ag Corrosion Products. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 160, 345-355. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.055308jes

  32. 32. Franey, J.P., Kammlott, G.W. and Graedel, T.E. (1985) The Corrosion of Silver by Atmospheric Sulfurous Gases. Corrosion Science, 25, 133-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-938X(85)90104-0

  33. 33. Sasaki, T., Kanagawa, R., Ohtsuka, T. and Miura, K. (2003) Corrosion Products of tin in Humid Air Containing Sulfur Dioxide and Nitrogen Dioxide at Room Temperature. Corrosion Science, 45, 847-854. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-938X(02)00151-8

  34. 34. Tran, T.T.M., Fiaud, C. and Sutter, E.M.M. (2005) Oxide and Sulphide Layers on Copper Exposed to H2S Containing Moist Air. Corrosion Science, 47, 1724-1737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2004.08.019

  35. 35. Seo, M., Ishikawa, Y., Kodaira, M., Sugimoto, A., Nakayama, S., Watanabe, M., Furuya, S., Minamitani, R., Miyata, Y., Nishikata, A. and Notoya, T. (2005) Cathodic Reduction of the Duplex Oxide Films Formed on Copper in Air with High Relative Humidity at 60 Co, Corrosion Science, 47, 2079-2090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2004.09.016

  36. 36. Niklasson, A., Johansson, L.G. and Svensson, J.E. (2007) Atmospheric Corrosion of Lead, The Influence of Formic Acid and Acetic Acid Vapors. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 154, 618-625. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.2775173

  37. 37. Lenglet, M., Lopitaux, J., Leygraf, L., Odnevall, I., Carballeira, M., Noualhaguet, J.C., Guinement, J., Gautier, J. and Boissel, J. (1995) Analysis of Corrosion Products Formed on Copper in Cl2/H2S/NO2 Exposure. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 142, 3690-3696. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.2775173

  38. 38. Astrup, T., Wadsak, M., Leygraf, C. and Schreinerb, M. (2000) In Situ Studies of the Initial Atmospheric Corrosion of Copper Influence of Humidity, Sulfur Dioxide, Ozone and Nitrogen Dioxide. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 147, 2543-2551. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1393566

  39. 39. Samie, F., Tidblad, J., Kucera, V. and Leygraf, C. (2005) Atmospheric Corrosion Effects of HNO3-Method Development and Results on Laboratory Exposed Copper. Atmospheric Environment, 39, 7362-7373. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1393566

  40. 40. Rickett, B.I. and Payer, J.H. (1995) Composition of Copper Tarnish Products Formed in Moist Air with Trace Levels of Pollutant Gas: Hydrogen Sulfide and Sulfur Dioxide/Hydrogen Sulfide. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 142, 3723-3728. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.2048404

  41. 41. Rickett, B.I. and Payer, J.H. (1995) Composition of Copper Tarnish Products Formed in Moist Air with Trace Levels of Pollutant Gas: Sulfur Dioxide and Sulfur Dioxide/Nitrogen Dioxide. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 142, 3713-3722. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.2048403

  42. 42. Tétreault, J., Cano, E., Bommel, M., Scott, D., Dennis, M., Barthés, L., Minel, L. and Robbio, L. (2003) Corrosion of Copper and Lead by Formaldehyde, Formic and Acetic Acid Vapours. Studies in Conservation, 48, 237-250. https://doi.org/10.1179/sic.2003.48.4.237

  43. 43. López-Delgado, A., Cano, E., Bastidas, J. and López, F. (2001) A Comparative Study on Copper Corrosion Originated by Formic and Acetic Acid Vapours. Journal of Materials Science, 36, 5203-5211. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012497912875

  44. 44. Samie, F., Tidblad, J., Kucera, V. and Leygraf, C. (2007) Atmospheric Corrosion Effects of HNO3-Comparison of Laboratory-Exposed Copper, Zinc and Carbon Steel, Atmospheric Environment, 41, 4888-4896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.02.007

  45. 45. Castano, J.G., de la Fuente, D. and Morcillo, M. (2007) A Laboratory Study of the Effect of NO2 on the Atmospheric Corrosion of Zinc. Atmospheric Environment, 41, 8681-8696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.07.022

  46. 46. Oesch, S. and Faller, M. (1997) Environmental Effects on Materials: The Effect of the Air Pollutants SO2, NO2, NO and O3 on the Corrosion of Copper, Zinc and Aluminium. A Short Literature Survey and Results of Laboratory Exposures. Corrosion Science 39, 1505-1530. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-938X(97)00047-4

  47. 47. Strandberg, H. and Johansson, L.G. (1997) Role of O3 in the Atmospheric Corrosion of Copper in the Presence of SO2. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 144, 2334-2342. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1837814

  48. 48. Eriksson, P. and Johansson, L.G. (1986) The Role of NO2 in the Atmospheric Corrosion of Different Metals. Proceeding of 10th Scandinavian Corrosion Congress. Stockholm, 43.

  49. 49. Campin, M.J. (2003) Microstructural Investigation of Copper Corrosion: Influence of Humidity, Ph.D. Dissertation, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces.

  50. 50. Mariaca, L., de la Fuente, D., Feliu, S., Simancas, J., Gonzalez, J.A. and Morcillo, M. (2008) Interaction of Copper and NO2: Effect of Joint Presence of SO2, Relative Humidity and Temperature. Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids, 69, 895-904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpcs.2007.10.003

  51. 51. Wikipedia (2017) Hydrogen Sulfide. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrogen_sulfide

  52. 52. Wikipedia (2017) Chlorine.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chlorine#cite_ref-Greenwood789_7-1

  53. 53. Vonderbrink, S.A. (2006) Laboratory Experiments for Advanced Placement Chemistry. 2nd Edition, Flinn Scientific, Inc., Batavia, 87.

  54. 54. Martina, I., Wiesinger, R., Simbürger, D.J. and Schreiner, M. (2012) Micro-Raman Characterization of Silver Corrosion Products: Instrumental Set Up and Reference Darabase. Preservation Science, 9, 1-8.

  55. 55. Sharma, S.P. (1978) Atmospheric Corrosion of Silver, Copper, and Nickel-Environmental Test. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 125, 2005-2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpcs.2007.10.003

  56. 56. Volpe, L. and Peterson, P.J. (1989) The Atmospheric Sulfidation of Silver in a Tubular Corrosion Reactor. Corrosion Science, 29, 1179-1196. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-938X(89)90065-6