﻿Combined Effects of Hall Current and Radiation on MHD Free Convective Flow in a Vertical Channel with an Oscillatory Wall Temperature

Open Journal of Fluid Dynamics
Vol. 3  No. 1 (2013) , Article ID: 29374 , 14 pages DOI:10.4236/ojfd.2013.31002

Combined Effects of Hall Current and Radiation on MHD Free Convective Flow in a Vertical Channel with an Oscillatory Wall Temperature

Sankar Kumar Guchhait1, Sanatan Das2, Rabindra Nath Jana1

1Department of Applied Mathematics, Vidyasagar University, Midnapore, India

2Department of Mathematics, University of Gour Banga, English Bazar, India

Email: jana261171@yahoo.co.in

Received December 11, 2012; revised January 15, 2013; accepted January 26, 2013

Keywords: Hall Current; MHD Free Convection; Radiation; Prandtl Number; Grashof Number; Frequency Parameter; Impulsive Motion; Accelerated Motion

ABSTRACT

The combined effects of Hall current and radiation on an unsteady MHD free convective flow of a viscous incompressible electrically conducting fluid in a vertical channel with an oscillatory wall temperature have been studied. We have considered two different cases 1) flow due to the impulsive motion of one of the channel walls and 2) flow due to the accelerated motion of one of the channel walls. The governing equations are solved analytically using the Laplace transform technique. It is found that the primary velocity and the magnitude of the secondary velocity increased with an increase in Hall parameter for the impulsive as well as the accelerated motions of one of the channel walls. An increase in either radiation parameter or frequency parameter leads to decrease in the primary velocity and the magnitude of the secondary velocity for the impulsive as well as accelerated motions of one of the channel walls. The fluid temperature decreases with an increase in radiation parameter. Further, the shear stresses at the left wall reduce with an increase in either radiation parameter or frequency parameter for the impulsive as well as the accelerated motions of one of the channel wall.

1. Introduction

The aim of the present paper is to study the combined effects of Hall current and radiation on the unsteady MHD free convective flow of a viscous incompressible electrically conducting fluid in a vertical channel with an oscillatory wall temperature of one of the channel walls. It is found that the primary velocity and the magnitude of the secondary velocity decrease with an increase in either radiation parameter or frequency parameter or Prandtl number for the impulsive as well as the accelerated motions of one of the channel walls. It is also observed that the primary velocity and the magnitude of the secondary velocity increase with an increase in either Hall parameter or Grashof number or time for the impulsive as well as accelerated motions. An increase in Grashof number leads to fall the fluid velocity components. An increase in the radiation parameter leads to increase the fluid temperature. Further, the shear stress at the wall due to the primary flow and the absolute value of the shear stress at the wall due to the secondary flow decrease for the impulsive as well as accelerated motions of one of the channel walls with an increase in radiation parameter. The rate of heat transfer at the wall decreases while the rate of heat transfer at the wall increases with an increase in Prandtl number.

2. Formulation of the Problem and Its Solution

Consider the unsteady MHD flow of a viscous incompressible electrically conducting radiative fluid between two infinitely long vertical parallel walls separated by a distance. The flow is set up by the buoyancy force arising from the temperature gradient. Choose a Cartesian co-ordinates system with the x-axis along the channel wall at in the vertically upward direction, the y-axis perpendicular to the channel walls and z-axis is normal to the xy-plane (see Figure 1). Initially, at time, the two walls and the fluid are assumed to be at the same temperature and stationary. At time, the wall at starts to move in its own plane with a velocity and its temperature is raised to whereas the wall at is stationary and maintained at a constant temperature, where is the frequency of the temperature oscillations. A uniform transverse magnetic field is applied perpendicular to the channel walls. We assume that the flow is laminar and the pressure gradient term in the momentum equation can be neglected. It is assumed that the effect of viscous and Joule dissipations are negligible. It is also assumed that the radiative heat flux in the x-direction is negligible as compared to that in the y-direction. As the channel walls are infinitely long, the velocity field and temperature distribution are functions of y and t only.

Under the usual Boussinesq approximation, the flow is governed by the following Navier-Stokes equations

(1)

Figure 1. Geometry of the problem.

(2)

where is the fluid density, the kinematic viscosity, and are fluid velocity components and the acceleration due to gravity.

The energy equation is

(3)

the fluid temperature, the thermal conductivity, the specific heat at constant pressure and the radiative heat flux.

The initial and boundary conditions for the velocity and temperature distributions are

(4)

It has been shown by Cogley et al. [26] that in the optically thin limit for a non-gray gas near equilibrium, the following relation holds

(5)

where is the absorption coefficient, is the wave length, is the Planck’s function and subscript indicates that all quantities have been evaluated at the temperature which is the temperature of the walls at time. Thus, our study is limited to small difference of wall temperatures to the fluid temperature.

On the use of the Equation (5), the Equation (3) becomes

(6)

where

(7)

The generalized Ohm’s law, on taking Hall currents into account and neglecting ion-slip and thermo-electric effect, is (see Cowling [27])

(8)

where is the current density vector, the magnetic field vector, the electric field vector, the cyclotron frequency, the electrical conductivity of the fluid and the collision time of electron.

We shall assume that the magnetic Reynolds number for the flow is small so that the induced magnetic field can be neglected. This assumption is justified since the magnetic Reynolds number is generally very small for partially ionized gases. The solenoidal relation for the magnetic field gives everywhere in the fluid where. Further, if be the components of the current density, then the equation of the conservation of the current density gives. This constant is zero since at the walls which are electrically nonconducting. Thus everywhere in the flow. Since the induced magnetic field is neglected, the Maxwell’s equation becomes which gives and. This implies that

and everywhere in the flow. We choose this constants equal to zero, i.e..

In view of the above assumption, the Equation (8) gives

(9)

(10)

where is the Hall parameter.

Solving (9) and (10) for and, we have

(11)

(12)

On the use of (11) and (12), the momentum Equations (1) and (2) along xand y-directions become

(13)

(14)

Introducing non-dimensional variables

(15)

Equations (6), (13) and (14) become

(16)

(17)

(18)

where is the magnetic parameter, the Grashof number, the Prandtl number and the radiation parameter.

The initial and boundary conditions (4) become

(19)

where is the frequency parameter.

Combining Equations (16) and (17), we get

(20)

where

(21)

The initial and boundary conditions for are

(22)

Taking the Laplace transform of Equations (20) and (18) and on the use of (19) and (22), we have

(23)

(24)

where

(25)

The initial and boundary conditions for and are

(26)

Solutions of Equations (23) and (24) subject to the boundary conditions (26) are given by

(27)

(28)

Now, we shall considered the following cases.

1) When the wall at started impulsively:

In this case, i.e.. Then the inverse Laplace transforms of Equations (27) and (28) give the solution for the temperature distribution and the velocity field as

(29)

(30)

where

(31)

2) When the wall at started acceleratedly:

In this case, i.e.. Then the inverse Laplace transforms of Equations (27) and (28) give the solution for the temperature distribution and the velocity field as

(32)

(33)

where and are given by (31).

3. Results and Discussion

We have presented the non-dimensional velocity components and temperature distribution for several values of Hall parameter, radiation parameter, Prandtl number, frequency parameter, Grashof number and time against when and

in Figures 2-17. It is seen from Figures 2 and 3 that the primary velocity and the magnitude of the secondary velocity increase with an increase of Hall parameter for the impulsive as well as accelerated motions of one of the channel walls. Figures 4 and 5 show that the primary velocity and the magnitude of the secondary velocity decrease with an increase in radiation parameter for both the impulsive and accelerated motions of one of the channel

Figure 2. Primary velocity for different when and.

Figure 3. Secondary velocity for different when and.

Figure 4. Primary velocity for different when and.

Figure 5. Secondary velocity for different when and.

Figure 6. Primary velocity for different when and.

Figure 7. Secondary velocity for different when and.

walls. It is illustrated from Figures 6 and 7 that the primary velocity and the magnitude of the secondary velocity decrease with an increase in Prandtl number for the impulsive as well as accelerated motions of one of the channel walls. Figures 8 and 9 show that both the primary velocity and the magnitude of the secondary velocity decrease with an increase in frequency parameter for both the impulsive and accelerated motions of one of the channel walls. An increase in Grashof number leads to increase the primary velocity and the magnitude of the secondary velocity for both the impulsive and accelerated motions of one of the channel walls shown in Figures 10 and 11. It is seen form Figures 12 and 13 that the primary velocity and the magnitude of the secondary velocity increase with an increase in time for both the impulsive and accelerated motions of one of the channel walls. It is seen from that the fluid temperature decreases with an increase in radiation parameter. This result qualitatively agrees with expectations, since the effect of radiation is to decrease the rate of energy transport to the fluid, thereby decreasing the temperature of the fluid. It is observed from that the fluid temperature increases with an increase in Prandtl number. This is in agreement with the physical fact that the thermal boundary layer thickness decreases with increasing. shows that the fluid temperature decreases with an increase of frequency parameter. shows that the fluid temperature increases when time progresses. It is seen from Figures 2-13 that the fluid velocities for the impulsive motion of one of the channel walls is always greater than the accelerated motion.

The rate of heat transfer at the channel walls and are respectively and and are given by (see the Equations (34) and (35) below).

where and are given by (31).

Numerical results of the rate of heat transfer at the channel walls and are respectively and which are presented in Tables 1-3 for several values of Prandtl number, timefrequency parameter when. Table 1 shows that the rate of heat transfer decreases while the rate of heat transfer increases with an increase in Prandtl number. Table 2 shows that the rate of heat transfer at the wall decreases whereas the rate of heat transfer at the wall increases when time progresses. It is seen from Table 3 that the rate of heat transfers and decrease with an increase in frequency parameter.

For the impulsive motion, the non-dimensional shear stress at the wall is given by (see the Equations (36) and (37) below).

 (34) (35)

(36)

where and are given by (31).

For the accelerated motion, the non-dimensional shear stress at the wall is as

(37)

where and are given by (31).

Figure 8. Primary velocity for different when and.

Figure 9. Secondary velocity for different when and.

. Primary velocity for different when and.

. Secondary velocity for different when and.

. Primary velocity for different when and.

. Secondary velocity for different when and.

Table 1. Rate of heat transfer and when and.

Table 2. Rate of heat transfer and when and.

Table 3. Rate of heat transfer and when and.

. Temperature for different when and.

Numerical results of the non-dimensional shear stresses and at the wall due to the primary and the secondary flows are plotted in Figures 18-27 against Hall parameter for several values of radiation parameter, Prandtl number, frequency parameter, Grashof number and time when

. Temperature for different when and.

and. Figures 18 and 19 show that the shear stress due to the primary flow and the magnitude of the shear stress due to the secondary flow at the wall decrease for the impulsive as well as accelerated motions of one of the channel

. Temperature for different for and.

. Temperature for different time for and.

. Shear stress for different when and.

. Shear stress for different when and.

. Shear stress for different when and.

. Shear stress for different when and.

. Shear stress for different when and.

. Shear stress for different when and.

. Shear stress for different when and.

. Shear stress for different when and.

. Shear stress for different time when and.

. Shear stress for different time when and.

walls with an increase in radiation parameter. It is seen from Figures 20 and 21 that for the impulsive and accelerated motions of one of the channel walls the shear stress and the magnitude of the shear stress increase with an increase of Prandtl number. Figures 22 and 23 show that the shear stress and the magnitude of the shear stress decrease with an increase in frequency parameter for the impulsive as well as accelerated motions of one of the channel walls. An increase of Grashof number leads to increase in the shear stress while the magnitude of the shear stress decreases for and increases for for both the impulsive and accelerated motions of one of the channel walls show in Figures 24 and 25. Figures 26 and 27 show that for both the impulsive and accelerated motions of one of the channel walls, the magnitude of the share stress decreases whereas the magnitude of the share stress increases with an increase in time.

4. Conclusion

The combined effects of Hall current and radiation on the unsteady MHD free convective flow in a vertical channel with an oscillatory wall temperature have been studied. Radiation has a reterding influence on the fluid velocity components for both the impulsive as well as accelerated motions of one of the channel walls. Hall currents accelerates the fluid velecity components for the impulsive as well as accelerated motions of one of the channel walls. In the prence of radiation the fluid temperature decreases. Further, the shear stress and the absolute value of the shear stress at the wall decrease with an increase in radiation parameter for the impulsive as well as accelerated motions of one of the channel walls. The rate of heat transfers and increase with an increase in radiation parameter .

REFERENCES

1. H. Sato, “The Hall Effects in the Viscous Flow of Ionized Gas between Parallel Plates under Transverse Magnetic Field,” Journal of Physical Society of Japan, Vol. 16, 1961, pp. 14-27. doi:10.1143/JPSJ.16.1427
2. O. Miyatake and T. Fujii, “Free Convection Heat Transfer between Vertical Plates—One Plate Isothermally Heated and Other Thermally Insulated,” Heat Transfer—Japanese Research, Vol. 1, 1972, pp. 30-38.
3. H. Tanaka, O. Miyatake, T. Fujii and M. Fujii, “Natural Convection Heat Transfer between Vertical Parallel Plates—One Plate with a Uniform Heat Flux and the Other Thermally Insulated,” Heat Transfer—Japanese Research, Vol. 2, 1973, pp. 25-33.
4. P. S. Gupta and A. S. Gupta, “Radiation Effect on Hydromantic Convection in a Vertical Channel,” International Journal of Heat Mass Transfer, Vol. 17, No. 12, 1974, pp. 1437-1442. doi:10.1016/0017-9310(74)90053-2
5. N. Datta and R. N. Jana, “Hall Effects on Hydromagnetic Convective Flow through a Channel with Conducting Walls,” Internationa Journal of Engineering Science, Vol. 15, No. 9-10, 1977, pp. 561-567. doi:10.1016/0020-7225(77)90052-0
6. A. R. Bestman and S. A. Adjepong, “Unsteady Hydromagnetic Free Convection Flow with Radiative Heat Transfer in a Rotating Fluid,” Space Science, Vol. 143, No. 1, 1988, pp. 73-80. doi:10.1007/BF00636756
7. H. M. Joshi, “Transient Effects in Natural Convection Cooling of Vertical Parallel Plates,” International Communication Heat and Mass Transfer, Vol. 15, No. 2, 1988, pp. 227-238. doi:10.1016/0735-1933(88)90068-1
8. A. K. Singh, “Natural Convection in Unsteady Couette Motion,” Defense Science Journal, Vol. 38, No. 1, 1988, pp. 35-41.
9. A. K. Singh, H. K. Gholami and V. M. Soundalgekar, “Transient Free Convection Flow between Two Vertical Parallel Plates,” Heat and Mass Transfer, Vol. 31, No. 5, 1996, pp. 329-331. doi:10.1007/BF02184046
10. B. K. Jha, “Natural Convection in Unsteady MHD Couette Flow,” Heat and Mass Transfer, Vol. 37, No. 4-5, 2001, pp. 329-331. doi:10.1007/PL00013295
11. M. Narahari, S. Sreenadh and V. M. Soundalgekar, “Transient Free Convection Flow between Long Vertical Parallel Plates with Constant Heat Flux at One Boundary,” Journal of Thermophysics and Aeromechanics, Vol. 9, No. 2, 2002, pp. 287-293.
12. B. K. Jha, A. K. Singh and H. S. Takhar, “Transient Free Convection Flow in a Vertical Channel Due to Symmetric Heating,” International Journal of Applied Mechichal Engineering, Vol. 8, No. 3, 2003, pp. 497-502.
13. A. K. Singh and T. Paul, “Transient Natural Convection between Two Vertical Walls Heated/Cooled Asymetrically,” International Journal of Applied Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2006, pp. 143-154.
14. D. C. Sanyal and A. Adhikari, “Effects of Radiation on MHD Vertical Channel Flow,” Bulletin of Calcutta Mathematical Society, Vol. 98, No. 5, 2006, pp. 487-497.
15. P. Mebine, “Radiation Effects on MHD Couette Flow with Heat Transfer between Two Parallel Plates,” Global Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2007, pp. 1-12.
16. T. Grosan and I. Pop, “Thermal Radiation Effect on Fully Developed Mixed Convection Flow in a Vertical Channel,” Technische Mechanik, Vol. 27, No. 1, 2007, pp. 37- 47.
17. M. Guria and R. N. Jana, “Hall Effects on the Hydromagnetic Convective Flow through a Rotating Channel under General Wall Conditions,” Magnetohydrodynamics, Vol. 43, No. 3, 2007, pp. 287-300.
18. B. K. Jha and A. O. Ajibade, “Unsteady Free Convective Couette Flow Of Heat Generating/Absorbing Fluid,” International Journal of Energy and Technology, Vol. 2, No. 12, 2010, pp. 1-9.
19. M. Narahari, “Effects of Thermal Radiation and Free Convection Currents on the Unsteady Couette Flow between Two Vertical Parallel Plates with Constant Heat Flux at One Boundary,” WSEAS Transactions on Heat and Mass Transfer, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2010, pp. 21-30.
20. U. S. Rajput and P. K. Sahu, “Transient Free Convection MHD Flow between Two Long Vertical Parallel Plates with Constant Temperature and Variable Mass Diffusion,” International Journal of Mathematical Analysis, Vol. 5, No. 34, 2011, pp. 1665-6671.
21. S. Das, B. C. Sarkar and R. N. Jana, “Radiation Effects on Free Convection MHD Couette Flow Started Exponentially with Variable Wall Temperature in Presence of Heat Generation,” Open Journal of Fluid Dynamics, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2007, pp. 14-27.
22. C. Mandal, S. Das and R. N. Jana, “Effect of Radiation on Transient Natural Convection Flow between Two Vertical Walls,” International Journal of Applied Information Systems, Vol. 2, No. 2, 2012, pp. 49-56.
23. S. Das, S. K. Guchhait and R. N. Jana, “Radiation Effects on Unsteady MHD Free Convective Couette Flow of Heat Generation/Absorbing Fluid,” International Journal of Computer Applications, Vol. 39, No. 3, 2012, pp. 42- 51.
24. B. C. Sarkar, S. Das and R. N. Jana, “Effects of Radiation on MHD Free Convective Couette Flow in a Rotating System,” International Journal of Engineering Research and Application, Vol. 2, No. 4, 2012, pp. 2346-2359.
25. B. C. Sarkar, S. Das and R. N. Jana, “Oscillatory MHD Free Convective Flow between Two Vertical Walls in a Rotating System,” Advance in Applied Science Research, Vol. 3, No. 5, 2012, pp. 3311-3325.
26. A. C. Cogley, W. C. Vincentine and S. E. Gilles, “A Differential Approximation for Radiative Transfer in a NonGray Gas Near Equilibrium,” American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Journal, Vol. 6, No. 3, 1968, pp. 551- 555.
27. T. G. Cowling, “Magnetohydrodynamics,” Interscience, New York, 1957.