Journal of Biosciences and Medicines
Vol.04 No.12(2016), Article ID:72715,15 pages

Testing of the Adhesion of Herpes Simplex Virus on Textile Substrates and Its Inactivation by Household Laundry Processes

Anja Gerhardts1, Dirk Bockmühl2, Andrea Kyas3, Anja Hofmann4, Mirko Weide5, Ingrid Rapp4, Dirk Höfer1

1William-Küster-Institut for Hygiene, Environment & Medicine, Hohenstein Institute for Textilinnovation gGmbH, Boennigheim, Germany

2Rhine-Waal University of Applied Sciences, Hygiene and Microbiology, Kleve, Germany

3Henkel AG & Co. KGaA, Corporate Scientific Services, Duesseldorf, Germany

4Labor Dr. Merk & Kollegen GmbH, Ochsenhausen, Germany

5Henkel AG & Co. KGaA, International R&D Laundry & Home Care, Duesseldorf, Germany

Copyright © 2016 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY 4.0).

Received: October 28, 2016; Accepted: December 11, 2016; Published: December 14, 2016


Viral infections like Herpes simplex increasingly pose a serious threat to European health care systems and welfare of the population. Indirect transmission routes of infections via inanimate surfaces are often underestimated. In this study, we investigated the adhesion and persistence of Herpes simplex virus on cotton fabrics as well as its inactivation by domestic laundry. Virus adhesion to textile fibers was distinct, because viral DNA was detectable on fabrics for at least 48 hours after contamination as well as after home laundry. Particles remained infectious for several hours at room temperature and partially for 48 hours at 2˚C - 8˚C. Nevertheless, domestic laundry was able to inactivate virus particles given that detergents were adequately used. This confirmed that standard household laundry processes, as established in Europe, are a suitable tool to reduce infectious Herpes virus particles from textiles, thereby supporting the prevention of infections circulating in the household and community.


Home Laundry, Herpes Simplex, Disinfectant Laundry Processes, Inactivation of Viruses

1. Introduction

Herpes simplex virus type 1 and type 2 together with varicella-zoster virus belong to the group of Alphaherpesvirinae. Epidemiologically, herpes simplex viruses are distributed worldwide and are among the most common pathogens. The overall seroprevalence of HSV-1 in Europe is about 80% and nearly 20% for HSV-2 [1] [2] [3] [4] . Herpes viruses are usually transmitted via droplet infection from throat secretions, as well as by contamination with the vesicle fluid from skin lesions and from the typical mucosal lesions of the oral-facial area (blisters) and genital organs [5] .

The most known route of infection for HSV-1 is direct, i.e. through contact with herpes blisters or through saliva. In general, HSV-1 is transmitted in this way already in early childhood by parents, so that in Germany about half of the children are seropositive before entering puberty [2] [6] . A second smaller postpubertal phase of infestation begins with the establishment of intimate contacts [7] . Nevertheless, herpes simplex virus can not only be spread from persons displaying acute symptoms, but also from asymptomatic ones [8] . Actually, infections transmitted by asymptomatic persons today are considered to be the main route [9] [10] .

Infectious viral diseases arising in the home environment or community, increasingly pose a serious threat to European health care systems and welfare of the population [11] [12] . Therefore, to successfully contribute to break chains of infection, also indirect transmission routes have to be revealed and investigated. As a particularly sensitive method for the detection of herpes viruses in molecular biology, the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is used, e.g. to study issues such as virus excretion and the associated risk of transmission [12] .

Textile fabrics play a role in the spread of viral diseases that must not to be underestimated [13] [14] . Although several studies showed examples for the indirect transmission of infections via fabrics or inanimate surfaces as summarized earlier [14] , there is a lack of awareness for this transmission route in society. Even many hygienists still neglect to advice stricter preventive measures like the daily change of clothes or the use of antimicrobial active surfaces. The indirect route of infection with herpes simplex, i.e. the transmission of virus via hands, lips or saliva first to clothing, towels or other textiles, and forward to non-infected persons, has not been investigated thoroughly so far. Transfer of the herpes pathogen may occur via hand contact from infected blisters content, e.g. when scratched, to inanimate surfaces such as consumer goods and textiles. Mahl and Sadler (1975) were the first to show a possible role of inanimate, hard surfaces in the transmission of herpes virus. They found that herpes simplex virus can survive on glass, ceramic or stainless steel surfaces for at least 8 weeks at room temperature [15] . Also a study on the survival of HSV on plastic-coated benches and seats in spa facilities showed significant amounts of herpes simplex virus after 4.5 hours on plastic surfaces in humid atmosphere, suggesting that fomites may play a role in routes of HSV transmission [16] . In a hospital study about the stability of HSV on environmental surfaces, Turner et al. (1982) showed that herpes virus particles freshly isolated from patients can survive more than two hours on the skin, three hours on clothing and four hours on plastic surfaces, which represents a risk for infection transmission.

Further data on the persistence or inactivation of herpes viruses on textiles are lacking. Basically, however, it was shown for polio and vaccinia viruses that clothing and household textiles are also able to transfer viruses and other infectious agents [17] [18] . Especially on cotton and wool fibers, the persistence time of polio and vaccinia viruses is high enough to be re-transmitted to objects or people [19] .

Against this backdrop, we investigated the question of persistence of the herpes virus in the community. So, we examined HSV DNA on textiles by using fresh isolates from herpes blisters in a practical approach. The polymerase chain reaction was applied to gain an assessment of virus adhesion on textiles during laundry. A disadvantage of this method is that inactivated particles cannot be distinguished from infectious virus. For the verification of infectious virus persistence, we used the HSV-1 laboratory strain hv342. Based on our data, we then wanted to clarify whether specific household laundry processes are able to sanitize textiles contaminated with herpes to avoid potential risks of virus infection among the population by using common established procedures.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Sampling of Herpes Simplex Virus (HSV)

Virus-containing swab samples were obtained from lesions on the lips of affected persons with sterile disposable swabs and refrigerated until further processing. The swabs were completely moistened with nuclease-free water and given to an insert for reaction tubes, which was placed in a 1.5 ml reaction vessel. Viruses were eluted from the swabs by centrifugation for 10 min at 1500 × g and 4˚C. Virus suspensions of six swab samples were pooled.

2.2. Specific Detection of HSV via Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)

For amplification of herpes simplex virus DNA, the gene of DNA polymerase was selected as template. PCR primers HSV_pol_fwd (5’-GTGTTCGACTTTGCCAGCCT-3’) and HSV_pol_rev (5’-GTCCGTGTCCCCGTAGATGA-3’) were modified according to Johnson et al. (2000). Reaction mixtures were prepared in 0.5 ml reaction vessels with 1 - 4 µl template DNA, 10 × DreamTaq Buffer, 0.4 µl dNTPs (10 mM), 0.5 µl of each primer HSV_pol_fwd and HSV_pol_rev (10 µM), 0.5 U DreamTaq DNA polymerase (MBI Fermentas, St. Leon-Rot, Germany) and nuclease-free water in a total volume of 20 µl. PCR reactions were performed in an Eppendorf Mastercycler gradient. The cycling parameters were as follows: pre-incubation for 3 min at 95˚C followed by 20 cycles of denaturation for 30 sec at 95˚C, annealing for 30 sec at 59˚C with a temperature decrement of −0.2˚C per cycle and extension for 45 sec at 72˚C. This was followed by 20 cycles of denaturation for 30 sec at 95˚C, annealing for 30 sec at 55˚C and extension for 45 sec at 72˚C and a final extension for 7 min at 72˚C. Reaction products were visualized by gel electrophoresis and ethidium bromide staining in a 1.5% agarose gel and documented using the GelDoc XR + system (Bio-Rad, Munich, Germany).

2.3. Identification of Virus Type by Restriction Enzyme Digestion

A 522 bp fragment was amplified by PCR from the pooled virus suspensions. PCR products were digested with the restriction endonucleases BamHI and Bsh1236I (equivalent to BstUI) in separate amplifications. The enzyme BamHI has no restriction sites in the HSV-1 sequence, but in the fragment from HSV-2. Bsh1236I recognizes multiple restrictions sites in the fragments of HSV type 1 and 2 (8 or 12, respectively). Therefore HSV-1 and HSV-2 can be differentiated after electrophoretic separation of digested PCR products according to their restriction pattern [20] .

2.4. Determination of the Adhesion of HSV-1 on Textiles

UV-sterilized textile swatches, approximately 1 cm2 in size, from standard cotton fabric according to DIN 53,919, were inoculated with 10 µl of pooled HSV-1 suspension each. The contaminated cotton swatches were transferred to reaction vessels at different time points after inoculation (after 1 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24 and 48 h) and the virus particles were inactivated at 95˚C for 5 min. For laundry experiments, contaminated swatches were knotted into mull sleeves, placed in a laundry bag and inserted into a standard household laundry process at 40˚C in a standard household washing machine (Miele Softtronic W1734) with phosphate-free ECE reference detergent (according to DIN EN ISO 6330) and 3.5 kg of ballast load. Subsequently, all swatches were eluted by centrifugation (4 min at 11,000 × g and 4˚C) with 20 µl 1 × TE (10 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8). As a control, cotton swatches inoculated with nuclease-free water were incubated and eluted in the same way. For specific detection of virus, 4 µl of each eluate was used for PCR as described above.

2.5. Determination of the Persistence of Infectious Particles

Sterile cotton swatches, approximately 2 cm2 in size, were inoculated with a mixture of 90 μl virus suspension (HSV-1 hv342) and 10 μl soil load (bovine serum albumin and sheep erythrocyte suspension according to EN 14,476). The cotton swatches were allowed to dry under laminar flow conditions for 5 minutes, then transferred to sterile petri dishes and were incubated at room temperature (20˚C - 25˚C) or at 2˚C - 8˚C, respectively. At different time points (0.5 h, 1 h, 2 h, 4 h, 6 h, 8 h, 24 h, 48 h) 1 ml ice- cold medium (Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM), Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH, Taufkirchen, Germany with added antibiotics and L-glutamine) was given to an individualized swatch in a plastic container filled with glass beads and vortexed for 2 × 30 seconds. The suspension was serially diluted and pipetted to Vero cells (ECACC 84,113,001, African Green Monkey kidney) in a 96 well microtiter plate. The cytopathogenic effect (CPE) was analyzed after 7 days of incubation at 37˚C ± 2˚C and 5% CO2 so as to give the virus enough time to proliferate. Two cotton swatches were analyzed per time point to achieve two independent titration results.

For the negative control or cytotoxicity control, the cotton swatches were inoculated with 90 μl water of standardized hardness plus 10 μl soil load instead of 90 μl virus suspension. Those swatches were incubated for 48 hours and analyzed as described above. An interference control was performed the same way as the negative control; after incubation and elution, the obtained suspension and a control fluid, mostly PBS, were given to Vero cells for 1 hour. After this incubation time, the fluid was removed and a serial virus dilution was given to the cells to examine that the cells are not negatively influenced by the treatment with cotton derived substances, so that the cells are still susceptible for virus infection. The difference between the titer of the treated and the untreated cells shall not exceed 0.5 log10.

As positive virus control, freshly thawed virus aliquot plus soil load was given to cotton swatches and immediately vortexed after 5 minutes of drying with 1 ml DMEM; this was used at specific time points in order to exclude processing errors. Additionally, a suspension control was performed without the use of cotton swatches to examine the effect of the cotton surface face to face with the virus respectively the behavior of cotton concerning the virus recovery. Therefore 90 μl virus suspension plus 10 μl soil load was mixed with 900 μl medium and the serial dilution was pipetted to Vero cells.

The virus titers were determined using the final dilution method. The calculation of virus reduction at different time points was calculated with the mean titer of the duplicate virus control at T0 and the single titer values of swatches achieved in the same experiment. Afterwards, mean values are calculated from all swatches of two independent experiments.

2.6. Determination of the Virus-Inactivating Efficacy of Laundry Processes

The virus-inactivating effect of common household laundry processes was assessed based on the reduction of the HSV-1 titer on contaminated germ carriers. Therefore, Herpes virus (HSV-1 hv342) was cultured on Vero B4 cells (DSMZ ACC 33; African Green Monkey kidney) using DMEM (Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium, Biochrom, Berlin, Germany) supplemented with 5% fetal calf serum (Biochrom, Berlin). Virus suspensions were obtained in accordance with the guideline of the German Association for the Control of Virus Diseases and the Robert Koch Institute for testing of chemical disinfectants effective against viruses used in human medicine [21] ; the virus titers were determined using the final dilution method. The final dilution method is based on the infectivity of the actual dilution of test material. Therefore, several dilutions are done in parallel and it is determined at which dilutions 50% of the inoculated cultures are infected. The amount of virus in this dilution is referred to as ID50.

Washed and sterilized germ carriers from cotton No. 11000 (WFK, Krefeld), 10 × 10 mm in size, were moistened with 100 µl of the virus suspension mixed with 40% fetal calf serum and used without drying. Two times 10 of the contaminated germ carriers were put into one laundry net made of polyester, 10 × 10 cm (Pfrommer, Bad Teinach, Germany), each and, together with another laundry net with 10 non-contaminated (sterile) carriers, were transferred to a laundry bag made of polyester, type MNV/GL (Polytex, Bietigheim, Germany). Afterwards, the laundry bag was washed with a contact time of 60 min ± 5 min and at a temperature of 30˚C ± 3˚C with ballast laundry (1 kg T-shirts made of a cotton/polyester blend fabric (Trigema, Burladingen, Germany)) in a domestic washing machine (Miele Novotronic W337). Before test washes, a hot wash program without product and linen was 3 times performed in the washing machine for cleaning and disinfection matters.

To test the influence of the detergent, two independent tests with a standard powdery laundry detergent (Persil Megaperls®, Henkel, Düsseldorf, Germany) were performed. The dosage of detergent was prepared according to manufacturer information (67.5 g/wash). As a control, a single wash with tap water without detergent additive was performed. After wash cycles, the contaminated and sterile germ carriers were removed from the machine and separately evaluated, both quantitatively and qualitatively. The quantitative evaluation was performed by constant shaking of germ carriers in 900 µl DMEM with 5% fetal calf serum + 100 µl 10 × PBS (Gibco, Karlsruhe, Germany) with glass beads for 1 min at 2500 rpm. Subsequently, the extracts were diluted and the individual dilution steps were directly given onto a confluent cell culture. The medium was changed every 24 h and the culture was microscopically controlled daily until the occurrence of a cytopathic effect for a maximum of seven days.

Eluted germ carriers were placed on a confluent cell culture for qualitative analysis and incubated for 24 h at 36.5˚C and 7.5% CO2. Then the medium was changed and the germ carrier was removed. Subsequently, the medium was replaced every 24 h and the culture was controlled as described above. Similarly, samples of washing liquor were analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively. Therefore, water samples were taken from the washing drum before the first rinsing cycle (time point T60) and 2-times 5 ml of this direct sample as well as 2-times 5 ml of sample 1:10 diluted in DMEM were given to a confluent cell culture. The medium was then replaced every 24 h and the culture was microscopically controlled daily until the occurrence of a cytopathic effect for a maximum of seven days. As a control of initial concentration, an additional water sample was taken already 3 min after the start of program (time point T0) and treated similarly.

3. Results

3.1. Specific Detection of Herpes Simplex Virus from Skin Swabs

For the direct detection of virus by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), swabs were obtained from lesions on the lips of those affected (i.e. swabs of cell-containing material from ruptured or crusted blisters, as well as punctures of blisters). After elution of swabs and isolation of the viral DNA, specific DNA fragments were amplified via PCR and were made visible by gel electrophoresis on a 1% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide. To differentiate types of HSV, the 522 bp long amplified sequence of the HSV DNA polymerase was digested with the restriction endonucleases BamHI and Bsh1236I.

In the amplified segment, the polymerase gene is cleaved by BamHI only in the HSV type 2. Therefore, HSV-1 is expected to show a single band of 522 bp, whereas HSV-2 is represented by two bands of 292 bp and 230 bp in length. In contrast, Bsh1236I provides a characteristic band pattern by multiple cleavage sites (8 or 12 respectively) for both herpes simplex virus types [20] . After digestion and electrophoresis of PCR products, the sampled specimens could thus be identified as HSV-1 isolates by their specific fragment lengths (see Figure 1).

3.2. Adhesion of HSV-1 on Textiles

To answer the question whether herpes simplex virus remains on clothing or textile articles―i.e. outside of the body―for an extended period, small cotton swatches were contaminated with the isolated HSV-1 suspension. After incubation of the textile samples at room temperature for 1 minute, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24 or 48 hours, the swatches were eluted and the isolated DNA was subjected to PCR analysis. As a control, cotton swatches inoculated with sterile water were eluted similarly.

In addition to this time course series, contaminated cotton swatches were exposed in a domestic laundry process at 40˚C. After the program, the swatches were removed and eluted. Again, the virus DNA remaining on the textile was determined by PCR. So, detectable DNA represents adhering virus particles on the fabric surface.

As shown in Figure 2, herpes simplex virus DNA was detected on all swatches

Figure 1. Species identification by restriction digestion of HSV DNA fragments. The amplicon of the isolated virus samples is not digested by BamHI. Only the larger fragments of Bsh1236I digest are visible, but can be identified as characteristic for HSV-1 based on fragment lengths of the DNA marker (100 bp DNA ladder GeneRuler, MBI Fermentas). The largest expected fragments for HSV-1 are 228 bp, 133 bp and 56 bp, for HSV-2 Bsh1236I cleaves fragments with a size of 155 bp, 88 bp and smaller.

Figure 2. Detection of HSV-1 DNA on contaminated cotton swatches after incubation at room temperature and 40˚C laundry. 1 and 16: GeneRuler 100 bp DNA Ladder (MBI Fermentas); 2: positive control HSV-1 (suspension); 3 - 11: eluates of textile swatches after incubation at room temperature for a period of 3: 1 minute, 4: 30 minutes, 5: 1 hour, 6: 2 hours, 7: 4 hours, 8: 6 hours, 9: 8 hours, 10: 24 hours, 11: 48 hours; 12 - 14: eluates of textile swatches after washing at 40˚C; 15: eluate of cotton swatch moistened with water (negative control).

contaminated with HSV-1. In both cases, after 48 hours of incubation at room temperature and after washing at 40˚C, detectable amounts of adhering virus DNA were still present on the standard cotton material. Experiments performed with a fabric made of viscose type 401 showed similar results than for cotton (data not shown).

3.3. Persistence of HSV-1 on Cotton Swatches

After these first results, the question was still whether the detectable virus DNA resulted from infectious particles and which quantities of particles can survive on fabrics. So, we investigated the stability of infectious particles on cotton swatches after incubation for 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24 and 48 hours at room temperature as well as under cool conditions (2˚C - 8˚C). Infectious virus particles were notably reduced within the first hour after drying (Table 1). At room temperature, the amount of infectious HSV-1 virus further decreased during the following period and was below the detection limit (here: 1.5 log10 ID50/ml) after 48 hours of incubation on cotton. Nevertheless, at lower temperatures the virus survived longer time periods and was still detectable on single swatches after 48 hours. This resulted in an average reduction of virus TCID50 (ID50) of only 2.5 log10 after 48 hours in cool conditions starting with an initial titer of more than 6 log10 (see Figure 3).

3.4. Virus Inactivation by Detergents in Common Household Laundry Processes

In a typical household washing machine, the effect of detergents in a 30˚C coloreds program (run time 60 minutes before the pumping and rinsing cycles were started) against HSV-1 on cotton germ carriers was investigated. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the washing detergent, control processes with water only (without detergent) were performed additionally using identical test parameters. In this control process, all germ carriers (20 contaminated and 10 sterile germ carriers) washed without detergent, were virus-positive at the end of the wash cycle. Via contamination of the washing liquor by the 20 germ carriers (corresponds to 2 ml of virus suspension in 7.8 l of washing

Table 1. HSV-1 persistence on cotton swatches (Titer and reduction in log10 ID50/ml).

n.t. = not tested; n.a. = not applicable.

liquor), a transfer of virus to the sterile germ carriers was observed (see Figure 4).

At the end of the control wash cycle, a mean titer of 2.9 and 2.5 ID50 on the originally contaminated germ carriers and a mean titer of approx. 1.5 ID50 on the originally sterile carriers were detected by quantitative analysis of the individual germ carriers (Table 2). The qualitative analysis of washing liquor showed virus-positive results directly after water supply (at time point T0) as well as after a processing time of 60 min (T60) (Table 3).

When using detergent, all germ carriers (20 contaminated and 10 sterile germ carriers) were virus-negative at the end of the washing cycle in the qualitative assessment.

Figure 3. Comparison of HSV-1 reduction on cotton swatches at 2˚C - 8˚C and at room temperature.

Figure 4. Comparison of average virus recovery from the wash tests without and with detergent.

Table 2. Virus recovery from a wash test without detergent, parallel processing in the same wash cycle.

qual. = qualitative analysis; quan. = quantitative analysis; + = virus-positive; n.e. = not evaluable.

Table 3. Analysis of washing liquor from the wash test without detergent.

qual. = qualitative analysis; quan. = quantitative analysis; + = virus-positive; n.e. = not evaluable. An ID50 of ≥1.5 indicates that the first dilution of quantitative analysis was contaminated with bacteria.

Also in the quantitative analysis of the individual germ carriers, no infectious virus could be detected (<0.5 ID50) (Table 4). A second, independent series of experiments led to the same result (data not shown). The washing liquor was virus-negative in the qualitative analysis of water samples at time points T0 and T60 (Table 5).

4. Discussion

In the present study, we qualitatively investigated the adhesion of herpes viruses on textiles using virus isolates from herpes blisters and the polymerase chain reaction. Additionally, by using a laboratory virus strain, we examined the persistence of infectious particles on these textiles quantitatively. Furthermore, we wanted to clarify whether specific household laundry processes are capable of solving the problem of virus-contaminated textiles, to prevent possible herpes virus infections in the population with common methods.

The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is routinely used for years as a diagnostic tool for the direct identification of pathogens [22] . Therefore, the viral nucleic acid is enzymatically amplified from patient swabs, fluid samples etc. The method advantageously allows the specific detection of viral DNA even from small amounts of initial sample.

Table 4. Virus recovery from a wash test with detergent, parallel processing in the same wash cycle.

qual. = qualitative analysis; quan. = quantitative analysis; + = virus-positive; - = virus-negative.

Table 5. Analysis of washing liquor from the wash test with detergent.

qual. = qualitative analysis; quan. = quantitative analysis; + = virus-positive; n.e. = not evaluable.

Therefore, we were able to identify herpes virus type 1 from skin lesions from affected patients via the DNA. With HSV-1 suspensions obtained from lesions, cotton swatches were contaminated and stored for up to 2 days. In contrast to a study of Turner et al. (1982), who described that herpes virus survived no longer than two to four hours outside the oral cavity on plastic and textile surfaces, our studies showed a strong persistence of HSV-1 DNA on textile swatches. Also after a standard household laundering process at 40˚C, detectable amounts of virus DNA were present, representing adhering virus particles. The disadvantage of the very sensitive and specific PCR method is that also inactivated virus material will be detected. For a risk assessment of infection or re-infection with herpes virus, we therefore had to answer the question, whether infectious particles persist under the above conditions besides the detection of viral genetic material. Thus, we quantitatively investigated the persistence of HSV-1 on textiles using virus titration of the laboratory strain hv342. These further results somehow generally confirmed the findings of Turner et al. (1982) and showed a significant decrease in infectivity of virus particles within 4 to 6 hours at room temperature. Nevertheless, notable titers of infectious particles could be shown after incubation at cool conditions (2˚C - 8˚C), even after 48 hours. This result reveals new insight in the persistence of HSV-1 and might play a role in winter, when herpes blisters are commonly present in affected persons and a transmission route via textiles can be relevant. Despite only few data on the survival of HSV on inanimate surfaces, Kramer et al. (2006) earlier concluded that HSV can persist longer in low humidity and at low temperature.

Furthermore, we particularly wanted to know if infectious viruses can be found on textiles after a common household laundry process. For this reason, we developed textile germ carriers, charged with the HSV-1 laboratory strain hv342, and examined the infectivity of virus after washing. Since it is known that virus transfer from virus- contaminated textiles to other textiles is possible [23] [24] , the viral load of the wash liquor and of initially sterile textile samples, washed in the same machine, were determined additionally.

The initially applied amount of virus was quantitatively recovered from unwashed control germ carriers. For the methodology and preparation used in this work it can be therefore concluded that the recovery rate of inserted virus is apparently high enough to subsequently record a reduction in viral load. The experiments were carried out in several parallels to ensure a higher confidence level and to compensate possible failures due to bacterial contamination of cell culture.

In a wash test without detergent, the reliable detection of virus-positive samples indicates an insufficient inactivation of virus during the laundry process. This could be stated although individual samples were not evaluable and the interpretation of results of water samples is difficult because of toxic effects of the wash liquor to cell cultures. These are probably due to an initial lack of mixing in the drum. However, the observed transmission of virus to previously not contaminated textiles in the control wash cycle can be explained by virus contamination of the wash liquor originating from introduced germ carriers.

In contrast, herpes virus has been completely inactivated by a common household laundry process at 30˚C using a detergent. This is apparent not only in the complete reduction on the contaminated germ carriers, but also by the fact that neither in the wash liquor nor on sterile germ carriers infectious virus particles could be detected. With regard to an infection risk, this result has to be considered in correlation to the required infectious dose of the pathogen. This is currently not known for HSV-1 [12] . However, one can assume that a reduction of the viral titer below a threshold that triggers a cytopathic effect in cell culture, in principle would exclude an infection risk in vivo, too. Against this background, it must be considered that the proof of the effectiveness of household laundry processes against viruses so far could be mainly provided with the help of in vitro methods, e.g. in accordance with guidelines of the RKI and DVV [21] . In the last years, methods have been published evaluating the virus-inacti- vating efficacy of laundry processes under realistic conditions [24] [25] [26] . In this study, a practical approach for evaluating the effectiveness of common household laundry processes against herpes viruses is provided for the first time.

In direct comparison to the studies of Heinzel et al. (2010), where a complete inactivation of polio virus in the tested washing procedures was observed, enveloped viruses seem to behave similarly in principle. Interestingly, our results showed that herpes viruses are apparently not inactivated solely by water and the laundry process, which is in some contradiction to the results of Turner et al. (1982), who found a survival rate of only two to four hours in the environment. If a low drying tolerance of herpes virus should play a crucial role here, this might, conversely, result in a prolonged virus survival of herpes viruses on textiles in a laundry process without adequate use of detergent. Given that in practice there are many different washing machines, detergents and laundry processes used in households, standard recommendations for the inactivation of pathogens, like the use of bleaching agents or temperatures ≥60˚C, should be noted. Nevertheless, one can estimate similar efficacy to this presented in our results with other standard detergents, because surfactants damage the lipid envelope of herpes virus and thereby will lead to an inactivation of particles.

Overall, our results show that domestic laundry was able to inactivate virus particles given that detergents were adequately used. With standard household laundry processes, family- and user-friendly procedures have been established in Europe to prevent infections circulating in the household and the community as propagated by experts [11] .

Cite this paper

Gerhardts, A., Bockmühl, D., Kyas, A., Hofmann, A., Weide, M., Rapp, I. and Höfer, D. (2016) Testing of the Adhesion of Herpes Simplex Virus on Textile Substrates and Its Inactivation by Household Laundry Processes. Journal of Biosciences and Medicines, 4, 111-125.


  1. 1. Hellenbrand, W., Thierfelder, W., et al. (2005) Seroprevalence of Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 (HSV-1) and Type 2 (HSV-2) in Former East and West Germany, 1997-1998. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 24, 131-135.

  2. 2. Sauerbrei, A., Schmitt, S., et al. (2011) Seroprevalence of Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 and Type 2 in Thuringia, Germany, 1999 to 2006. Eurosurveillance, 16, No. 44.

  3. 3. Marques, N.M., Margalho, R., et al. (2011) Seroepidemiological Survey of Transmissible Infectious Diseases in a Portuguese Prison Establishment. Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases, 15, 272-275.

  4. 4. Kucera, P., Gerber, S., et al. (2012) Seroepidemiology of Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 and 2 in Pregnant Women in Switzerland: An Obstetric Clinic Based Study. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 160, 13-17.

  5. 5. Doerr, H.W. and Rabenau, H. (1996) [Dermatotropic Herpes Viruses: Infection Biology, Epidemiology and Diagnostics] Dermatotrope Herpesviren: Infektionsbiologie, Epidemiologie und Diagnostik. Chemotherapie Journal, 5, 1-11.

  6. 6. Chenot, J.F., Rabenau, H.F., et al. (1999) Virologie, Epidemiologie und Diagnostik des Herpes genitalis. Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift, 124, 158-162.

  7. 7. Buxbaum, S., Geers, M., et al. (2003) Epidemiology of Herpes Simplex Virus Types 1 and 2 in Germany: What Has Changed? Medical Microbiology and Immunology, 192, 177-181.

  8. 8. Wald, A., Zeh, J., et al. (2002) Genital Shedding of Herpes Simplex Virus among Men. The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 186, S34-S39.

  9. 9. Kaufman, H. E., Azcuy, A.M., et al. (2005) HSV-1 DNA in Tears and Saliva of Normal Adults. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 46, 241-247.

  10. 10. Schulte, J.M., Bellamy, A.R., et al. (2014) HSV-1 and HSV-2 Seroprevalence in the United States among Asymptomatic Women Unaware of any Herpes Simplex Virus Infection (Herpevac Trial for Women). Southern Medical Journal, 107, 79-84.

  11. 11. Bloomfield, S.F., Exner, M., et al. (2008) [Prevention of Infection through Hygiene in the Home and Community. The Need for a Family-Centred Approach]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz, 51, 1258-1263.

  12. 12. Sacks, S.L., Griffiths, P.D., et al. (2004) HSV Shedding. Antiviral Research, 63, 19-26.

  13. 13. Bloomfield, S., Exner, M., et al. (2008) Prevention of the Spread of Infection—The Need for a Family-Centred Approach to Hygiene Promotion. Eurosurveillance, 13, 1-4.

  14. 14. Gerhardts, A., Mucha, H., et al. (2012) [On the Role of Textile Surfaces in the Chain of Infection]. Hygiene & Medizin, 37, 400-403.

  15. 15. Mahl, M.C. and Sadler, C. (1975) Virus Survival on Inanimate Surfaces. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 21, 819-823.

  16. 16. Nerurkar, L.S., West, F., et al. (1983) Survival of Herpes Simplex Virus in Water Specimens Collected from Hot Tubs in Spa Facilities and on Plastic Surfaces. JAMA, 250, 3081-3083.

  17. 17. Dixon, G.J., Sidwell, R.W., et al. (1966) Quantitative Studies on Fabrics as Disseminators of Viruses. II. Persistence of Poliomyelitis Virus on Cotton and Wool Fabrics. Appl Microbiol, 14, 183-188.

  18. 18. Sidwell, R.W., Dixon, G.J., et al. (1966) Quantitative Studies on Fabrics as Disseminators of Viruses. I. Persistence of Vaccinia Virus on Cotton and Wool Fabrics. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 14, 55-59.

  19. 19. Sidwell, R.W., Dixon, G.J., et al. (1967) Quantitative Studies on Fabrics as Disseminators of Viruses. III. Persistence of Vaccinia Virus on Fabrics Impregnated with a Virucidal Agent. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 15, 921-927.

  20. 20. Johnson, G., Nelson, S., et al. (2000) Comprehensive PCR-Based Assay for Detection and Species Identification of Human Herpesviruses. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 38, 3274-3279.

  21. 21. Rabenau, H.F., Schwebke, I., Blumel, J., Eggers, M., Glebe, D., Rapp, I., Sauerbrei, A., Steinmann, E., Steinmann, J., Willkommen, H. and Wutzler, P. (2015) [Guideline of the German Association for the Control of Viral Diseases (DVV) eV and the Robert Koch Institute (RKI) for Testing Chemical Disinfectants for Effectiveness against Viruses in Human Medicine. Version of 1 December, 2014]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz, 58, 493-504.

  22. 22. Enders, G. (1992) [Virus Infections] Virusinfektionen. In: Thomas, L., Ed., [Lab and Diagnosis] Labor und Diagnose, Med. Verlagsgesellschaft, Marburg, 1545-1630.

  23. 23. Sidwell, R.W., Dixon, G.J., et al. (1970) Quantitative Studies on Fabrics as Disseminators of Viruses. IV. Virus Transmission by Dry Contact of Fabrics. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 19, 950-954.

  24. 24. Gerhardts, A., Wilderer, C., et al. (2009) [Testing of Disinfecting Laundry Processes against Viruses via Application of Bioindicators and the Surrogate Virus MS2, Part 1: Low-Temperature Laundry]. Hygiene & Medizin, 34, 272-281.

  25. 25. Heinzel, M., Kyas, A., et al. (2010) Evaluation of the Virucidal Performance of Domestic Laundry Procedures. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, 213, 334-337.

  26. 26. Gerhardts, A., Mucha, H., et al. (2012) Testing Linen Disinfection Procedures in Practice with Phage-Charged Bioindicators. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 25, 519-531.