ABSTRACT

Context: Optimal timing of hCG administration is a crucial step for successful IVF. Currently used standard hCG administration timing is not always practically possible due to weekends break or other reasons. Sometimes hCG needs to be administrated earlier or later than standard timing. Aim: To find out whether earlier or later hCG administration gives better IVF outcome. Setting and Design: A retrospective study on patients who underwent conventional IVF treatment. Methods and Material: Based on hCG timing, the patients were divided into three groups: the early hCG group where the hCG was given when less than three follicles ≥ 17 mm; the standard hCG group where the hCG was given when three or more follicles ≥ 17 mm; and the late hCG group where the hCG was given 1 to 3 days after the standard timing. The number of retrieved mature oocytes, the fertilization rate, the number of good quality embryos, the pregnancy rate and the live birth rate were compared among three groups. Statistical Analysis: x² test, fisher exact test and Student t-test were used. Results: in total, 289 patients, 305 IVF cycles and 2784 oocytes were analyzed. The late hCG group has significantly larger number of MII oocytes, fertilized oocytes and good quality embryos per IVF cycle, when compared with the early hCG group. The fertilization rate, the pregnancy rate and the live birth rate per IVF cycle were similar among the three groups. Conclusion: Although the delayed administration of hCG did not favor IVF outcome per IVF cycle, the cumulative pregnancy rate is likely to be improved with consideration of higher yield of good quality embryos.

1. INTRODUCTION

Optimal timing of human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) administration is a crucial step for successful in-vitro fertilization (IVF). Currently most reproduction centers follow a commonly accepted guideline, that is, hCG is given when three or more follicles ≥ 17 mm are observed under ultrasound. This “standard” hCG administration timing, however, is not always practically possible. In practical work, because of weekend break or other reasons from the patients, sometimes hCG has to be administered one or two days earlier or later. If both options are available, which alternative is better, earlier or later? The answer is not yet clear. A few studies have looked at the effects of early or late hCG administration, but the results are controversial [1-6]. Most of these studies focus on the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist treatment [1,3,4,6]. In our reproduction center, we use more often GnRH agonist treatment. In this study, we compared early, late and standard hCG timing, and analyzed the effect of the different timing with respect to the number of retrieved mature oocytes, the fertilization rate, the number of good quality embryos, the pregnancy rate and the live birth rate.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

2.1. Materials

This retrospective study was carried out at our center for reproduction. The study was approved by the regional ethical review board. Dnr 2010/260.

289 patients who underwent conventional IVF treatment under the years 2008 and 2009 at our reproduction center were included in the study. 16 patients underwent two IVF treatments with the same or different protocols, both treatments were included in the study. In total 305 IVF cycles were analyzed. Inclusion criteria for patients were age ≤ 38 years and BMI < 30. All intracytoplasmic sperm injections (ICSI) were excluded, because ICSI could artificially affect the fertilization rate. Two experienced doctors and five experienced embryologists worked under the period, following the same principles for all the treatments that minimized the artificial effects on the results.

2.2. Clinical Treatments and Study Setting

GnRH agonist treatment: Pituitary desensitization was achieved by down-regulation using GnRH agonist, (Suprecur, Sanofi-aventis AB Stockholm, Sweden; or Synarela, Pfizer AB, Stockholm, Sweden) from day 21 of the previous cycle. After at least 14 days of agonist administration, FSH (Puregon, Merch Sharp & Dohme, Stockholm, Sweden; or Gonal-f, Merck AB, Stockholm, Sweden) stimulation was commenced. At the same time, the dose of the agonist decreased to half. Blood test on estradiol (E2) was taken after 5 - 6 days of stimulation and FSH dose was adjusted according to the E2 level. The first ultrasound scan was carried out after 8 - 9 days of stimulation and repeated when necessary.

GnRH antagonist treatment: On menstruation day 2 or day 3, patients start subcutant injection of FSH (Puregon, Merch Sharp & Dohme, Stockholm, Sweden; or Gonal-f, Merck AB, Stockholm, Sweden). On stimulating day 6, commenced GnRH antagonist (Orgalutran, Merch Sharp & Dohme, Stockholm, Sweden; or Cetrotide, Merck AB, Stockholm, Sweden). daily 0.25 mg subcutaneously. On the same day, blood test on serum E2. Dose of FSH was adjusted depending on the E2 level. The first ultrasound scan was carried out after 7 - 8 days of stimulation and repeated when necessary.

The time point of administration of hCG was decided at the last ultrasound scan. HCG (Pregnyl, Merch Sharp & Dohme, Stockholm, Sweden) 10,000 IU was given to most of the patients. 5000 IU was given when the risk of over stimulation was considered high.

Based on the hCG timing, the patients were divided into three groups: the early hCG group where the hCG was given when the number of big follicles (≥17 mm) is less than three; the standard hCG group where the hCG was given when the number of big follicles (≥17 mm) is three or more; and the late hCG group where the hCG was given 1 to 3 days later than the standard timing.

Oocyte retrieval was carried out 36 hours after hCG administration under transvaginal ultrasound guidance. All the follicles visible under ultrasound were punctured.

Conventional IVF was performed in all patients, including donor IVF. Embryo transfer (ET) were performed mainly on day 2. A small proportion of patients had ET on day 3. Only one embryo was transferred each time. The embryos that could be used for transferring or freezing were considered “good quality embryos”.

Luteal phase was supported with vaginal Progesterone MIC (Apoteket Produktion & Laboratorier AB, Stockholm, Sweden) 400 mg × 3 daily until the pregnancy was confirmed by ultrasound on week 7 - 8.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

The total number of retrieved oocytes, the number of retrieved mature oocytes, the fertilization rate, the number of good quality embryos, the pregnancy rate and the live birth rate were compared among the three groups.

All the quantitative data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD).

x² test was used to evaluate the difference in causes of infertility among the three groups, the ratio of GnRH agonist/antagonist, the ratio of day2/day3 (D2/D3) ET, the fertilization rate, the pregnancy rate, the live birth rate, the ratio of MII/total retrieved oocytes and the ratio of good quality embryos/fertilized oocytes. Fisher exact test was used when the frequency value was less than five. Student t-test was used to evaluate difference in maternal age, the duration of FSH stimulation, the thickness of uterus endometrium, the number of retrieved oocytes per cycle, the number of MII oocytes per cycle, the number of fertilized oocytes per cycle and the number of good quality embryos per cycle.

Two tails P-value < 0.05 was taken to be significant.

3. RESULTS

In total, 289 patients and 305 IVF treatments are included in this study.

Table 1 shows the characteristics of all the patients. Except more agonist-treatments in the standard and the late hCG group when compared with the early group, no significant differences are seen among the three groups regarding patients’ age, the causes of infertility, the embryo transferring timing, the duration of FSH stimulation or the thickness of uterus endometrium.

Table 2 summarizes the results of the comparison among the early, the standard and the late hCG groups. In total, 2784 oocytes are retrieved. Of the total retrieved oocytes, the late and the standard hCG group have a significantly higher proportion of MII oocytes than the early hCG group: 89.36% and 89.18% vs 82.73%. Correspondingly, the late hCG group has a significantly larger number of MII oocytes per IVF cycle when compared with the early hCG group: 8.53 vs 6.57. As the fertilization rate, the ratio of good quality embryos/ fertilized oocytes are similar between the three groups, the higher yield of MII oocytes in the late hCG group leads to significant larger number of fertilized oocyte and good quality embryos per cycle, when compared with the early group. The pregnancy rates are similar among the three groups. The live birth rate is lower in the early hCG group than in the standard and the late groups; 28.57% vs 40.96% and 40.11%. However, the difference is not

statistically significant.

Table 3 illustrates the comparison among the early, the one-day and the two-days delayed groups. There is no significant difference between one-day and two-days delayed groups. Both one-day and two-days delayed groups have better results than the early group regarding the number of MII oocytes, the number of fertilized oocytes and the number of good quality embryos per cycle. However, the live birth rate is similar among three groups.

We compared also standard and two-days delayed group. The results show that the two-days delayed group

has a tendency to give better IVF results with regard to the MII oocyte yield per cycle (8.81 vs 7.75), the number of fertilized oocytes per cycle (6.75 vs 5.40), the number of good quality embryo per cycles (3.75 vs 3.16) and the live birth rates (48.08% vs 40.96%). But the differences are not statistically significant.

4. DISCUSSIONS

The results of this study suggests that, no matter GnRH antagonist or agonist treatment, if administration of hCG switch is needed, it is better to delay hCG timing rather than to advance it. The delayed administration of hCG may not favor IVF outcome in a single cycle, but the cumulative pregnancy rate is likely to be improved with consideration of higher yield of mature oocytes, fertilized oocytes and good quality embryos per IVF cycle.

Dimitry et al. found that a 24 hours delay in hCG administration under agonist treatment hade a higher pregnancy rate when compared to standard timing [2]. In our study, we did not observe the increased pregnancy rate. However, taking into account the larger number of good quality embryos that have been frozen, one could expect that the cumulative pregnancy rate and live birth rate would be higher in the delayed hCG group if patients undergo several ETs. Our results are also in agreement with Tremellen et al., although they investigated GnRH antagonist treatments [6]. Their study showed that one-day delaying of hCG administration did not affect IVF live birth rate, but did increase both the number of retrieved oocytes and created embryos.

Earlier reported beneficial effects of a delayed hCG timing are limited to one day. Our results show that both one-day and two-day delaying are better than early hCG timing. Two-day delaying seems have more beneficial effects than one-day delaying although the statistic analysis did not show the significance. Kolibianakis’ group reported in a large randomized prospective trial that a two-day delaying of hCG under GnRH antagonist treatment did not affect oocyte or embryo quality but was associated with a significantly lower ongoing pregnancy rate [3]. The lower pregnancy rate, according to the same research group, could be due to extreme endometrial advancement as a higher incidence of premature secretary changes were found on the day of oocyte retrieval after two-day delaying [4]. Two other groups found that premature elevated progesterone could impair implantation and live birth rate [7,8]. Chuang et al. found that prolonged stimulation, 13 days or more vs 10 - 12 days, was associated with decreased live birth rate [1]. Concerning the other studies’ results and the relatively small number of patients in our study, we cannot ultimately conclude that two-day delaying is better than one-day delaying.

In principle, delayed hCG timing yields a greater amount of larger follicles, which in turn yields more mature oocytes with better developmental competence, according to a number of earlier studies [9-16]. The relationship between the follicle sizes and the developmental competence of the oocytes has been investigated by different research groups. They found that oocytes from larger follicles have higher fertilization rate, cleavage rate, and implantation/pregnancy rate [9-16]. The mechanism is not yet clear; it may be due to better cytoplasm maturation in the oocytes from the larger follicles. In our study, we did not follow follicles/oocytes one by one, so it is difficult to say if the good quality embryos are from those oocytes within larger follicles or not. However, we found that the number of good quality embryos had good correlation with the number of follicles larger than 15 mm at the hCG administration. This suggests that follicle size could be used as one of the predictors for IVF outcome. The emergency of 3D measurement of oocytes could help doctors make better predictions [17].

Among most of the IVF cycles, we notice a big drop from fertilized oocytes to good quality embryos, no matter it is on day 2 or day 3. It seems that a majority (83% - 89%) of retrieved oocytes are mature and most (68% - 72%) of these mature oocytes can be fertilized, but only half (52% - 58%) of them develop further to embryos with good quality. To improve the final IVF outcome, more efforts are needed to optimize the development of the embryo after fertilization, for example, by changing the culture medium or lowering the osmolarity [18]. If we can achieve better development of embryo in vitro, we will have a much higher IVF success rate in the future.

In our study, we grouped the patients in respect of agonis/antagonist treatment. As showed in Table 1, we hade more antagonist cycles in early hCG group, and more agonist cycles in the standard and late hCG group. Concern about biased results may arise as some earlier studies showed that the agonist protocol gives the better oocyte yield and pregnancy rates [19,20]. However, most of studies do not show any significant difference between the two treatments [21,22] and the conception is now generally accepted. Therefore, we believe that the differences we observed among the three hCG groups are not biased by the different ratio of agonist/antagonist cycles among the groups.

In summary, our study together with other published data indicates that if the switching of hCG administration timing is needed, one-day delaying is better than early timing. To decide whether or not the current “standard” timing should be changed to one day later, larger randomized controlled trials are needed before a clear answer can be provided.

REFERENCES

NOTES

^*Corresponding author.