Open Journal of Inorganic Chemistry
Vol.05 No.01(2015), Article ID:52922,4 pages
10.4236/ojic.2015.51002

Preparation of Y(Mn1xFex)O3 and Electrical Properties of the Sintered Bodies

Shin Nishiyama*, Isao Asako, Yasuhiko Iwadate, Takeo Hattori

Graduate School of Engineering, Chiba University, Chiba-Shi, Japan

Email: *shin@faculty.chiba-u.jp

Copyright © 2015 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Received 15 November 2014; revised 9 December 2014; accepted 4 January 2015

ABSTRACT

YMnO3 and the Fe doped samples were prepared and the lattice constants, electrical conductivities and Seebeck coefficients were measured. The solubility limit of Fe for Mn of YMnO3 was 25 atomic %, the electrical conductivity increased in the range of 350˚C - 700˚C as Fe increased up to 10%, and the doped samples showed larger Seebeck coefficient than undoped samples.

Keywords:

Yittrium Manganite, Iron Doping, Solubility Limit, Electrical Conductivity, Seebeck Coefficient

1. Introduction

YMnO3 is known to crystallize in a hexagonal structure [1] and has both ferroelectric and antiferromagnetic properties [2] [3] . The Curry and the Neel temperatures are 914 and 73 K, respectively. And the crystal transition occurred from the space group of P63cm to P63/mcm 600 to 990 K [4] . Whereas pure YMnO3 is ferroelectric and insulating, it could be a conducting material with carrier doping. Gutierrez et al. substitute Ni for Mn site of YMnO3 and observed hopping conduction behavior up to 700˚C [5] .

In this study, sintered bodies of pure YMnO3 were prepared and the electrical conductivity and the thermoelectric power up to 800˚C were measured. The effect of Fe-substitution for Mn was also examined.

2. Experimental

Samples are prepared by ordinary solid state reactions. As starting materials, Y2O3 (99.99%), MnO2 (99.5%), Fe2O3 (99.9%) were used. Y2O3 were pre-calcined at 600˚C for 10 min for elimination of water. Y2O3, Mn2O3 and Fe2O3 were weighed to prepare Y(Mn1−xFex)O3 (x = 0, 0.05, 0.1. 0.2, 0.225, 0.275, 0.3, 0.4) and mixed with a pastle in a mortar of Al2O3 for 1 h. For YMnO3, the mixed powders were calcined in crucibles of Al2O3 at temperatures among 900˚C and 1300˚C for 2 h. The powders calcined were uniaxially pressed and then isostatically pressed into disks of diameters of about 10 mm or rectangular bar of 4 × 3 × 20 mm. Then, the green bodies were placed in an aluminum-oxide crucible and sintered in air at 1300˚C, 1400˚C or 1500˚C for 4 h.

The phases of the mixed and the calcined powders were analyzed by X-ray diffraction (XRD). The lattice constants of Y(Mn1−xFex)O3 powders were calculated from the precisely measured XRD patterns. The densities of the sintered bodies were measured by Archimedes' method.

The samples prepared were evaluated by electrical properties, electrical conductivity and Seebeck coefficients. Electrical conductivity was measured using the four-probe method with an alternating current of 1 kHz. As the electrodes, four platinum wires were attached using silver paste. The resistivity was measured in air at temperatures between room temperature and 900˚C at increasing and decreasing temperature rates of 10˚C/min using an infrared image furnace.

Thermoelectric power was measured using an apparatus having double heaters to prepare specimens temperature differences of approximately 10˚C. The temperature of both ends of the specimens were measured using CA thermocouples, and the thermoelectric voltage was measured via two platinum wires (0.1 mm φ) using a computer-controlled mV-meter (HP 3457A). The Seebeck coefficients were determined using a least-squares analysis of five ΔV vs. ΔT data points, where ΔV was the voltage gradient due to the thermoelectric effect of an induced thermal gradient ΔT. The Seebeck coefficient was measured in air at temperature between 100˚C to 800˚C. The absolute (non-relative) values of the Seebeck coefficient were calculated using the measured values and the absolute ones of platinum, which were measured previously by Cusack et al. [6] .

3. Results and Discussion

XRD patterns of powders prepared by calcination of mixed powders at temperatures between 900˚C to 1200˚C are shown in Figure 1. As for the mixture of Y2O3 and Mn2O3, only Y2O3 was clearly detected with XRD. When calcined at 900˚C, besides Y2O3, YMn2O5 was detected. Calcination at temperatures higher than or equal 1000˚C caused YMn2O5 react with residual Y2O3 resulting YMnO3 phase. Finally, the single phase of YMnO3 was prepared to heat at 1100˚C for 2 h.

Figure 1. XRD patterns of powders prepared by calcination of mixed powders at temperatures between 900˚C to 1200˚C.

The relative densities of the sintered bodies fired at 1300˚C, 1400˚C or 1500˚C as a function of calcining temperature of powder preparation are shown in Figure 2. This result indicates that densification of this material needs temperature up to 1500˚C and the best calcining temperature is 1100˚C - 1200˚C. When fired at 1500˚C, color of the bottom of the crucibles changed slightly brown. This shows that firing over that temperature make Mn volatile and the stoichiometry not maintained. In case sintered up to 1500˚C, all the resulting bodies were single phase of YMnO3.

Figure 3 shows XRD patterns of calcined powders composition of which were Y(Mn1−xFex)O3 (x = 0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.225, 0.25 and 0.3). When x reached 0.3, the peak reflected from YFeO3 phase was detected. Figure 4 shows the lattice constants a and c of the Fe doped samples. From these results, the limit of Fe doping for solid solution was said to be 0.25. The relative densities of all of the Fe-doped and single phased samples were around 90%, which showed Fe did not affect to sintering conditions.

Figure 2. The relative densities of the sintered bodies fired at 1300˚C, 1400˚C or 1500˚C as a function of calcining temperature of powder preparation.

Figure 3. XRD patterns of calcined powders composition of which were Y(Mn1−xFex)O3 (x = 0. 0.1, 0.2, 0.225, 0.25 and 0.3).

The electrical properties of the nominal pure YMnO3 were those of canonical extrinsic semiconductors. Figure 5 shows electrical conductivity of pure and Fe-doped YMnO3 sintered bodies. The electrical conductivity of the pure YMnO3 increased with increasing temperature. However, the plateau was observed from 450˚C to 750˚C, which seems the region of saturation of carriers. Figure 6 shows Seebeck coefficients of the samples. From this graph, it is shown that every sample showed positive Seebeck coefficients, so that the carrier of YMnO3 was holes. As temperature increased above 700˚C, the Seebeck coefficients of pure YMnO3 decreased, which

Figure 4. The lattice constants a and c of pure and Fe- doped YMnO3 samples.

Figure 5. Electrical conductivity (σ) of pure and Fe-doped YMnO3 sintered bodies.

Figure 6. Seebeck coefficients (α) of pure and Fe-doped YMnO3 sintered bodies.

means that the tendency of the intrinsic conduction was detected in this temperature range. This also explained the increase of electrical conductivity above 750˚C.

As Fe substituted for Mn, electrical conductivity around 500˚C increased, and Seebeck coefficient over 700˚C also increased, up to x = 0.1. This showed that Fe substitution made the hole concentration rise and the extrinsic behavior of the conduction became conspicuous. Although Fe can substitute up to x = 0.25, which is concluded from the crystal data, the effect of substitution on the electrical properties was limited up to x = 0.1.

4. Conclusion

The single phase of YMnO3 was prepared to heat at 1100˚C for 2 h and densification of this material needs temperature up to 1500˚C and the best calcining temperature was 1100˚C - 1200˚C. The plateau of the electrical conductivity was observed from 350˚C to 750˚C. The limit of Fe doping for solid solution was said to be 0.25 and the effect of substitution on the electrical properties was limited up to x = 0.1.

References

  1. van Aken, B.B., Meetsma, A. and Palstra, T.T.M. (2001) Crystal Structure Communications. Acta Crystallographica, C57, 230-232. http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S0108270100015663
  2. Martın-Carron, L., de Andres, A., Martınez-Lope, M.J., Casais, M.T. and Alonso, J.A. (2001) Raman Phonons and the Jahn-Teller Transition in RMnO3 Manganites. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 323-324, 494-497.
  3. Fiebig, M., Goltsev, A.V., Lottermoser, Th. and Pisarev, R.V. (2004) Structure and Interaction of Domain Walls in YMnO3. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 272-276, 353-354. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2003.12.669
  4. Gutierrez, D., Peña, O., Duran, P. and Moure, C. (2002) Crystal Structure, Electrical Conductivity and Seebeck Coefficient of Y(Mn,Ni)O3 Solid Solution. Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 22, 567-572. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0955-2219(01)00302-8
  5. Janoschek, M., Roessli, B., Keller, L., Gvasaliya, S.N., Conder, K. and Pomjakushina, E. (2005) Reduction of the Ordered Magnetic Moment in YMnO3 with Hydrostatic. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 17, L425-L430.
  6. Cusack, N.E. and Kendall, P.W. (1958) The Absolute Scale of Thermoelectric Power at High Temperature. Proceedings of the Physical Society, 72, 898. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0370-1328/72/5/429

NOTES

*Corresponding author.