American Journal of Plant Sciences
Vol.06 No.11(2015), Article ID:58487,4 pages

Inheritance of R Locus Expressing Brown Hilum on Black Seed Coat in Soybean

Valeria Carpentieri-Pipolo1*, Leones Alves de Almeida2, Romeu Afonso de Souza Kiihl2

1Embrapa Trigo, Passo Fundo, Brazil

2TMG Tropical Melhoramento e Genética Ltda, Cambé, Brazil

Email: *

Copyright © 2015 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).

Received 16 June 2015; accepted 28 July 2015; published 31 July 2015


Color is one of the phenotypic markers mostly used to study soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) in the study of genetic, molecular and biochemical processes, due to their easy recognizability. The genetic control of several soybean natural variants has not been studied. The standard phenotype of R gene is black hilum on black seed. The genetic type T16 is the only occurrence with brown hilum on black seed coat and its genetic control was not described until now. The aim of this study is to understand the genetic control of seed coat and hilum color in the genetic types T16 and in the natural variants of Bragg, BR6 and BR13. T16 was combinined with Bragg P and BR13P (black seed color) and BR6M (brown seed color) and T236 (r-m). It was found that the genetic control of the brown hilum trait in black seed coat of the T16 genotype was controlled by two loci segregat- ing independently and controlling the expression of the color of the hilum and the seed coat color. The expression of the brown hilum trait in black seed coat is dependent on locus T_, which con- trols pubescence color; therefore it occurs only in genotypes with tawny brown pubescence (T_), which caracterizes the pleiotropic effect of this locus on the trait hilum brown trait in black seed coat. The color of the hilum and the seed coat color belong to the same allelic sequence. No maternal effect was found in the expression of hilum brown trait in black seed coat.


Seed Coat Colour, Glycine max, Mutable Allele, Soybean

1. Introduction

Seed color is controlled by a small number of genes and because of that, this trait is frequently used by breeders as a readily assayed visible marker for the presence of “off-types” in soybean seed lots.

The visual appearance of the soybean seed has been altered as result of domestication during the transition of the wild Glycine soja to the current cultivated Glycine max. All modern commercial high yielding Glycine max germplasms possess yellow seed coats with a range of hilum colors (brown, black, imperfect black, buff, yellow), whereas the soybean Glycine soja accessions in the USDA Soybean Germplasm Collections possess black seed coats. The wild type soybean seed coat and hilum color in soybean are secondary metabolites derived from flavonoid pathway such as proanthocyanidins and anthocyanins which play a relevant role in plant pathogen defense and protection from UV light exposure [1] .

In soybean (Glycine max L. Merril) the R gene is involved in anthocyanin synthesis in seed coat, the standart R locus produces black hilum and black seed coat. In additional it is found that the locus R is also involved in the variegation phenotype affecting seed coat color. The r-m allele of this gene produces striped seed coat superimposed on an brown seed color, and the locus R and two additional independent loci I anthocyanin inhibitor and T tawny, control pigmentation and anthocyanin accumulation [2] [3] .

The I locus controls the presence or absence and spatial distribution of flavonoid pigments and has four alleles (I, ii, ik, i). In the presence of I the total inhibition of pigmentation occurs; the double recessive allele ii allows full pigmentation of the seed; with ii allele, pigmentation is restricted to the hilum; with the allele ik pigmentation in hilum and in part of the seed coat occurs. Plants carrying the I or ii allele show complete inhibition of pigmentation in the seed coat or pigmentation only in the hilum, respectively, resulting in a yellow seed phenotype. However, there are four main seed coat colors (black, brown, yellow and green), and the inheritance of black and brown pigments is genetically independent from the green and yellow ones [4] -[6] .

The the dominant allele T conferred brown (or tawny) and t conferred gray pubescence color. Further, T generally darkens hilum and/or seed coat color in combination with genotypes at the I, W1, R and O loci [7] [8] . The allelic series T/t-r/t produces the seed coat or hilum colors of black, red-buff and buff, respectively [9] . The dominant allele T was completely shown to suppress the development of abnormal pigmentation around the hilum region and to partially suppress the cracking of seed coat associated with chilling treatments. One recessive gene conditioning the phenotype spread hilum in the T48 genotype was found. The expression of the spread hilum is dependent of locus T_, which controls pubescence color; therefore it occurs only in genotypes with brown pubescence (T_), which characterizes pleiotropic effect of this locus on the trait spread hilum [10] .

The inheritance black hilum/black seed coat was described by Kovinich et al. [4] ; Carpentieri-Pipolo et al. [9] ; Yang et al. [6] and Senda et al. [5] . More recently Gillman et al. [10] identified the specific gene and causative basis behind the phenomenon of brown hilum/seed coat coloration in soybean (R locus), and discovered an allelic series of four loss of function mutations affecting our R locus gene candidate (R2R3 MYB gene). The presence of each one of these mutations was perfectly correlated with the brown seed coat/hilum phenotype in a broadly distributed survey of soybean cultivars. These findings strongly suggest that loss of function for one particular seed coat-expressed R2R3 MYB gene is responsible for the brown seed coat/hilum phenotype in soybean.

The allelic sequence R, r-m, and r controls the pigment color and the presence of stripes in the seed coat. The r-m allele is dominant over r and recessive to R. The r-m allele exhibits instability in somatic and germinal cell layers and the revertants phenotypic forms are not stable with expression forms of the allele at high frequency [11] . The expression of this not typical phenotypic germinal instability was suggested as transposable elements residing in or near the r-m allele. Since the revertants of r-m alleles may be not be identical to the standard R and r forms they were designated by Chandlee and Vodkin [11] as designate R* and r*. There is one phenotypic difference between the standart R allele, and the R* carryng brown hilum in black seed and r* carryng r-m (striped seed coat); thus the locus R is not stable and could produce all three forms R*, r-m and r [11] .

The standard phenotype R gene is black hilum on black seed [11] . The genetic type T16 is the only occurrence with brown hilum on black seed coat in the Glycine max accession of USDA soybean germplasm and its genetic control until now is not described yet.

The aim of this study is to understand the genetic control of seed coat and hilum color in the genetic types T16 and the natural variants of the commercial cultivars Bragg, BR13 and BR6.

2. Materials and Methods

The genetic type T236 is an Glycine max accession of USDA Soybean Germplasm Collections with white flower, gray pubescence and a usual red-buff (Rbf) seed coat which conditioned by allele at the T/t locus. LC 91-26 is a PI91073 isoline, it is homozygous (r-m/r-m) (brown striped) and a source of r-m allele in the USDA GRIN germplasm collection, accessed on 30/06/2015 ( The standard soybean cultivars Bragg and BR13 are yellow seed coat with a black hilum and the standard BR6 is brown seed coat with a brown hilum; the isolines natural variants, BraggP and BR13P with black hilum and black seed coat and BR6M with Brown hilum and brown seed coat respectively were used in the crossing as parental (Brazilian Ministry of Agriculture and Food Supply, MAPA, accessed 30/06/2015, The soybeans seeds cultivars including the isolines natural variants were provided by the Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (Embrapa Soybean), Soybean active germplasm Bank of Embrapa.

The phenotypes of the parental inheritance involved in this study, the color of the seed coat and hilum are shown in Table 1.

F1 and F2 generations resulting from crosses between soybeans genotypes T16 × Bragg, T16 × BraggP, T16 × BR 13P, T16 × BR 6M, T16 × LC 91-26, T16 × T236, were studied. The parental population F1 and F2 were handled in a greenhouse, under temperature conditions ranging from 25˚C to 30˚C, and 16 hours of light at Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation, Embrapa Soybean, in Londrina, PR, Brazil at 23˚22' latitude south.

Crossing were performed from December 2009 to February to 2010. F1 plants, were obtained in the winter of 2010. Authentication of hybrid origin of F1 plants was carried out and they were compared with their female parental. Additional phenotypic markers such as flower, pubescence and pod color were used to verify that the seeds produced were hybrid. Having in mind that the age of the seed influences in the expression of the genetic traits of the soybean, renewing of parent seeds was carried out during the winter of 2009 and F2 generation, were planted in December 2010.

Seed coat colors were assessed by inspecting mature and dried seeds visually. The F2 segregating generations were separated into classes through comparison with a parental sample. The data obtained was grouped according to the distribution of the frequency of the plants for the characteristic, and the χ2 (chi-square) test was applied to test the genetic hypothesis of monogenic, digenic and polygenic inheritance.

3. Results and Discussion

No difference between the original and reciprocal crosses was found, suggesting that there was no effect of maternal control on the characteristic hilum color. Hilum tissue is not maternally-derived, in contrast to the seed coat. Phenotypes of F1 seeds showed that the black hilum was dominant over the brown hilum, a previously expected result as described by Chandlee and Vodkin [11] in their study of the relation between black and brown pigment in soybean hilum and seed coat. Regarding the seed coat, the yellow color was dominant over the black one in breeding T16 × Bragg, and over tanned-red in the crossing T16 × T236, the same dominance relation that was observed by Seo et al. [9] in his study of the inheritance of Buff-red seed coat in genotype T236.

F2 segregation from T16 × Bragg (Table 2) indicated that the brown hilum pigmentation in black seed coat is controlled by a single allele R. We have shown that the phenotype brown hilum pigmentation in black seed coat in the genetic type T146 (R) is controlled by a single allele [11] .

In the crosses T16 × BraggP and T16 × BR 13P, the F2 segregation presented correspondence to the 3:1 proportion (black hilum: brown hilum). This result was confirmed by the low value observed in the chi-square (χ2 = 0.009 and p = 0.922 and χ2 = 0.099 and p = 0.751, respectively), which shows that the inheritance of seed color the hilum color were determined by a single gene in these crosses, and the black hilum dominates over brown hilum.

The dominance relation (3:1) was observed in crosses T16 × BR 6M (χ2 = 0.007 and p = 0.930) and T16 × LCV 91-26 (χ2 = 0.206 and p = 0.649) with dominance of brown striped seed coat color over brown seed coat. However, there was only segregation of seed coat color, and all the seeds showed brown hilum, confirming that all T16 and BR6 Brown genotypes and LCV91-26 (brown striped) have the same genetic constitution for hilum color. Chandlee and Vodkin [11] have examined the inheritance of r-m allele through several generation and found that it exihibits unusual allele instability which changes in gene expression that can convert to the other expression form of the alleles at high frequencies. This behavior has not been seen in other unstable alleles in soybean and suggests that an insertion sequence or tranposable elements resid in or near the r-m allele.

The F2 population of T16 × Bragg demonstrated segregation in four different phenotype classes (yellow seed coat with black hilum, yellow seed coat with brown hilum, black seed coat with black hilum and black seed coat with brown hilum). The proportion 244:84:72:24 observed in F2 showed concordance with the expected one of

Table 1. Simplified description of phenotypic effects of four different genetic loci affecting seed coat and hilum colors of the cultivars and the isolines natural variants used as parents plants.

Table 2. Distributions of R allele frequencies among progeny F2 of soybean plants.

9:3:3:1 (χ2 = 1.324 and p = 0.723) for two loci segregating independently and controlling the expression of the color of the hilum and the seed coat color.

The I allele inhibits the production and accumulation of pigments over the entire seed coat, resulting in uniformly yellow-colored seeds, whereas the i allele leads to completely pigmented seeds by allowing the production and accumulation of pigments over the entire seed coat. The remaining two alleles, ii and ik, inhibit pigmentation except in the hilum and a saddle-shaped region, respectively. Yellow soybean cultivars carry the I allele for a light (no pigmented) hilum or the ii allele for a dark (pigmented) hilum [4] - [6] , as observed T16 and Bragg, that carry i and ii, respectively. The dominance relationships among the four alleles are I > ii > ik > i. Inhibition of seed coat pigmentation by the I locus, at least the I and ii alleles, is the result of RNA silencing of chalcone synthase (CHS) genes [5] .

In cross T16 × T236, segregation of the F2 population in four phenotype classes also occurred (black seed coat with black hilum, black seed coat with brown hilum, red-buff seed coat with buff hilum and red-buff seed coat with red-buff hilum). The obtained results for hilum color and seed coat color correspond to the segregation of 9:3:3:1 (χ2 = 0.160 and p = 0.983), indicating two loci segregating independently. The F2 population have shown two phenotypes for pubescence color: tawny brown and gray pubescence. Plants with gray pubescence (tt) did not produce seeds with tawny brown hilum on black seed coat (T_), it only was observed in the plants with tawny brown pubescence, therefore the expression of the brown hilum trait on black seed coat is dependent on locus T_, which controls pubescence color; therefore it occurs only in genotypes with tawny brown pubescence (T_), which characterize pleiotropic effect of this locus on the trait hilum brown trait on black seed coat.

Seo et al. [9] observed that chi-square analysis indicated that the segregation of F2 population of cross between T236 and Clark isoline L68-2077 (r-m) were not significantly, different from the 3:1 ratio expected for a monogenic inheritance model, with black dominant on red-buff seed coat.

The genetic control of the brown hilum trait in black seed coat in the T16 genotype is controlled by a single recessive. There is no citoplasmatic effect in the expression of this trait and the genetic control of the brown hilum trait in the black seed coat, although belonging to the same allelic sequence, there is a different control from the hilum and black seed coat trait.

4. Conclusion

The presence of multiple independent alleles suggested that this gene was selected during domestication either directly for brown coloration or indirectly for hilum colors.


The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of CAPES (Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior).

Cite this paper

ValeriaCarpentieri-Pipolo,Leones Alvesde Almeida,Romeu Afonsode Souza Kiihl, (2015) Inheritance of R Locus Expressing Brown Hilum on Black Seed Coat in Soybean. American Journal of Plant Sciences,06,1857-1861. doi: 10.4236/ajps.2015.611186


  1. 1. Zabala, G. and Vodkin, L. (2003) Cloning of Pleiotropic T Locus in Soybean and Two Recessive Alelles That Differentially Affect Structure and Expression of Encoded Flavonoid 3’ Hydroxylase, Genetics, 163, 295-309.

  2. 2. Bernard, R.L. and Weiss, M.G. (2004) Qualitative Genetics, 117-149 in Soybean: Improvement, Production and Uses. In: Caldwell, B.E., Ed., 3rd Edition, American Society of Agronomy, Madison.

  3. 3. Rabel, M., Vieira, E.S.N., Lana, U.G.P., Paiva, E., Sehnem, M.A.S. and Schuster, I. (2010) Marcadores Moleculares microssatélites na avaliaç&atildeo de sementes de soja com variaç&atildeo na coloraç&atildeo do hilo. Revista Brasileira de Sementes, 32, 19-25.

  4. 4. Kovinich, N., Saleem, A., Arnason, J.T. and Miki, B. (2011) Combined Analysis of Transcriptome and Metabolite Data Reveals Extensive Differences between Black and Brown Nearly-Isogenic Soybean (Glycine max) Seed Coats Enabling the Identification of Pigment Isogenes. BMC Genomics, 12, 381-399.

  5. 5. Senda, M., Kurauchi, T., Kasai, A. and Ohnishi, S. (2012) Suppressive Mechanism of Seed Coat Pigmentation in Yellow Soybean. Breeding Science, 61, 523-530.

  6. 6. Yang, K., Jeong, N., Moon, J.K., Lee, Y.H., Lee, S.H., Kim, H.M., Hwang, C.H., Back, K., Palmer, R.G. and Jeong, S.C. (2010) Genetic Analysis of Genes Controlling Natural Variation of Seed Coat and Flower Colors in Soybean. Journal of Heredity, 101, 757-768.

  7. 7. Guo, Y. and Qiu, L.J. (2013) Allele-Specific Marker Development and Selection Efficiencies for Both Flavonoid 3’-Hydroxylase and Flavonoid 3’5’-Hydroxylase Genes in Soybean Subgenus Soja. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 126, 1445-1455.

  8. 8. Carpentieri-Pípolo, V., Souza, A., Almeida, L.A., Kiihl, R.A.S. and Pípolo, A.E. (2007) Heran&ccedila de hilo esparramado em sementes de soja. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 42, 127-129.

  9. 9. Seo, Y.W., Specht, J.E., Graef, G.F. and Graybosch, R.A. (1993) Inheritance of Red-Buff Seed Coat in Soybean. Crop Science, 33, 754-758.

  10. 10. Gillman, J.D., Tetlow, A., Lee, J.D., Shannon, J.G. and Bilyeu, K. (2011) Loss-of-Function Mutations Affecting a Specific Glycine max R2R3 MYB Transcription Factor Result in Brown Hilum and Brown Seed Coats. BMC Plant Biology, 11, 155-167.

  11. 11. Chandlee, J.M. and Vodkin, L.O. (1989) Unstable Expression of a Soybean Gene during Seed Coat Development. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 77, 587-594.


*Corresponding author.