Advances in Chemical Engineering and Science
Vol.06 No.04(2016), Article ID:71541,16 pages
10.4236/aces.2016.64046

Adsorptive Removal of Heavy Metals from Aqueous Solution with Environmental Friendly Material―Exhausted Tea Leaves

Bindra Shrestha1*, Jagjit Kour1, Kedar Nath Ghimire2

1Department of Chemistry, Tri-Chandra Campus, Kathmandu, Nepal

2Central Department of Chemistry, Tribhuvan University, Kirtipur, Nepal

Copyright © 2016 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY 4.0).

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Received: September 5, 2016; Accepted: October 24, 2016; Published: October 27, 2016

ABSTRACT

In this study adsorptive removal of Pb(II) and Cu(II) from aqueous solution by using environmental friendly natural polymers present in exhausted tea leaves has been studied. The biosorbent was modified with dimethylamine to introduce N-functional groups on the surface of adsorbent. The modified adsorbent was characterized by elemental analysis, zeta potential analysis, SEM, DRFTIR, XRD and TG/DTA analysis to conform the modification. Adsorption capacity of the adsorbent was determined as the function of pH of the solution, initial concentration of the solution and contact time. The adsorption experiments were performed using batch experiments. The maximum adsorption capacities of the adsorbent were found to be 91.68 and 71.20 mg/g for Pb(II) and Cu(II), respectively. To minimize the process cost, regeneration of the biosorbent and recovery of metal ions was explored by desorption study. The results indicate that the adsorbent holds great potential for the sequestration of Pb(II) and Cu(II) from their aqueous solution. Hence the modified exhausted tea leaves (MTL) have been investigated as a new cost effective and efficient biosorbent for removal of Pb(II) and Cu(II) from their aqueous solution.

Keywords:

Natural Polymer, Biosorbent, Heavy Metals, Dimethylamine, Exhausted Tea Leaves

1. Introduction

The rapid industrial development causes environmental contamination with heavy metals. The industries like electroplating, alloy formation, leather tanning, textiles, dye, and mining discharge a large amount of heavy metal contaminated waste water to the aquatic environment. As heavy metals are non-biodegradable and soluble in aquatic environment, they are absorbed by living organisms. Once they enter the food chain they tend to accumulate in living organisms causing serious health disorders [1] . Lead is one of the most toxic environmental pollutants which cause health hazards even in trace concentration. Copper is one of the most important heavy metals used in electroplating and brass manufacture. Compounds of copper are used in agriculture. It deposits in skin, brain, liver, pancreas and myocardium causing serious toxicity [2] . Therefore the metal contaminated waste water must be treated prior to their discharge to the environment.

The conventional methods to remove heavy metals include chemical precipitation, oxidation reduction, electrochemical treatment, ion exchange, co-precipitation and membrane filtration. These processes become inefficient and expensive when the metals are present only in trace concentration, in order of 1 - 100 mg/L [3] . For such solution the adsorption by activated carbon is more effective for metal removal. But the method becomes highly expensive for treatment of waste water [4] . In such case biosorption provides an attractive alternative to the conventional methods [5] . The advantages of biosorption include their cost effectiveness, high efficiency and minimization of sludge production, regeneration of biosorbent and possibility of metal recovery [6] .

Biosorbents are prepared from naturally abundant waste biomass. They contain different types of functional groups on their surface including carboxylate, hydroxyl, amine, amide and phosphate which are found to be responsible for metal sorption. But the sorption capacities of native biosorbents have been reported unsatisfactory with low sorption capacity [7] .

The surface modification of biomass increases the sorption capacity. The common chemical modification methods are acid or alkali treatment, crosslinking with glutaraldehyde, epichlorohydrin [8] [9] . Similarly the surface of the biosorbent can be chemically modified to introduce more effective functional groups like N-functional groups (amino, hydrazine, amide and imidazoline groups), phosphate group, and xanthate group [10] - [12] . It is obvious that the metal sorption capacity increases after the introduction of a large number of effective groups on the surface of the biosorbent. The N atoms of functional groups would have a greater tendency to donate a pair of electrons for sharing with metal ions to form metal complexes [13] . It has been reported that adsorbents with N-functional groups favor the metal ion adsorption through the chelation mechanism. Such N-functional groups on the surface of biosorbent have been found to be more effective chelating group for adsorption of heavy metals from aqueous solution [14] . Hence there has been considerable interest in surface modification to introduce N-functional groups so as to enhance the adsorption capability of biosorbent.

Many researchers have been used various biosorbents in less effective way [15] - [18] . In present study exhausted tea leaves―a biowaste, have been used as biosorbent. After water tea is the most widely consumed beverage in the world. The tea leaves (Camellia sinensis), once the beverage has been brewed become a waste. The exhausted tea leaves were then chemically modified to introduce N-functional group. The modified biosorbent was characterized using spectral and elemental analysis. The adsorption behaviors including effect of pH, sorption isotherm and kinetics of adsorption were investigated for the adsorption of Pb(II) and Cu(II) from their aqueous solution.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Adsorbent, Chemicals, Reagents and Instrumentations

The exhausted tea leaves (ETL) were washed with hot distilled water for several times till the filtrate became clear. After thorough washing, it was dried in an oven at 80˚C for 24 hrs. The dried biosorbent was powdered and sieved to pass through the 212 µm sieve. About 100 g of the powdered sample was treated with acid which removes the water soluble substances and the polymeric network of the adsorbent is also exposed for further treatment. The acid treated tea leaves was washed several times with distilled water till neutrality and dried in an oven at 80˚C for 24 hrs. The adsorbent was then aminated with dimethylamine. The procedures used are similar to those earlier reported [19] . The prepared sample was called Modified tea leaves (MTL).

The biosorbent was characterized by elemental analysis (Elementar Vario Macro elemental analysis instrument-Italy), SEM images (S-3000 N Scanning Electron Microscope of HITACHI, Japan), DRFTIR spectra (Harrick scientific corporation-Italy), XRD (X-Ray diffractometer, Rigaku-Japan), TG/DTA analysis (TG (/DTA 6200-Japan).

To prepare Pb(II) and Cu(II) solutions, their Stock solutions of 1000 mg/L were prepared by dissolving calculated amount of lead nitrate and copper sulphate in 0.1 M HNO3. Working solutions of various concentrations were prepared by diluting the stock solution with 0.1 M HNO3. In all the experimental works pH of the solutions were maintained by using 0.1 M HNO3 and 0.1 M NaOH. For pH measurement Hanna Instrument was used. The 0.1 M solution of 2-[4-(2-hydroxymethyl)-1-piperazinyl] ethanesulphonic acid [HEPES] was used as buffer. All the chemicals used were of analyti- cal grade (AR) and double distilled water was used wherever necessary for the experimental works. During the experiments the concentration of metal ions were analyzed using Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (Agilent technologies, AAS, model-240FSAA, USA).

2.2. Adsorption Experiments

2.2.1. Effect of pH

The adsorption capacity of the adsorbent was studied as the function of pH keeping the concentration of metal ions constant by using batch experiment. 20 mL of 50 mg/L metal solutions with pH 1 to 7 were added to 50 mL conical flasks, each with 25 mg adsorbent. The flasks were shaken for 24 hrs in a mechanical shaker at 150 rpm maintaining the temperature at 25˚C. After shaking, the mixtures were filtered. The pH of filtrates was measured and concentration of metal ions was analyzed using AAS. The adsorption efficiency, A% can be calculated by using following equation

(1)

where Ci is initial concentration and Ce is equilibrium concentration of metal ions.

2.2.2. Isotherm Study

Isotherms of adsorption were determined by taking 20 mL of metal solutions of various concentrations ranging from 25 to 800 mg/L in conical flasks containing 25 mg of adsorbent in each. The optimum pH of the solutions was maintained using 0.1 M NaOH and 0.1 M HNO3. The flasks were shaken for 24 hrs in a mechanical shaker at 150 rpm. After shaking the mixtures were filtered and the residual concentration of respective metal ions was analyzed in AAS.

2.2.3. Kinetic Study

To determine the optimum time for the adsorption, 20 mL of 50 mg/L solutions were taken in several conical flasks containing 25 mg of adsorbent in each. The optimum pH of solutions was maintained by adding 0.1 M NaOH and 0.1 M HNO3. The flasks were shaken in a mechanical shaker at 50 rpm. The flasks were taken out from the shaker after each predetermined intervals of time and filtered. The filtrates were analyzed for concentration of metal ions in AAS.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterization

To enhance the adsorption capacity of the biosorbent, it was chemically modified with dimethylamine. During the chemical modification it is supposed that the alcoholic and phenolic OH groups present in lignin, cellulose and hemicelluloses of the biosorbent were substituted with N-functional group. The introduction of N-functional groups is indicated by the elemental analysis of the adsorbent before and after modification. The percentage of nitrogen in tea leaves is 1.03, which is increased to 5.5 after modification. The modified biosorbent was further characterized by Scanning electron microscope (SEM), Diffused reflectance fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (DRFTIR), X-ray diffraction analysis (XRD) and Thermogravimetric analysis (TG/DTA).

3.1.1. Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) Analysis

The surface morphology of the biosorbent was examined by its SEM images. The images are given in Figure 1. Initially the surface of the exhausted tea leaves is found smooth with uniform micro porous structure which becomes rough after modification indicating the chemical modification of the adsorbent. The surface of tea leaves after modification shows irregularly distributed pores, which are supposed to be formed due to the increase of effective diffusion surface area derived from pore formation [20] . The enhancement of metal sorption after modification may be due to the rough surface of MTL with pores [21] .

3.1.2. Diffused Reflectance Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (DRFTIR)

In this experiment, acid treated biosorbent was modified by using dimethylamine. Introduction of this N-functional group can be analysed by infrared spectroscopy. In

Figure 1. SEM images (a) and (b) of ETL and MTL, respectively.

DRFTIR analysis, each specific chemical bond often shows a unique energy absorption band and it has been used as a useful tool to identify the presence of certain functional groups on the surface of the biosorbent [22] [23] .

The DRFTIR spectra of ETL and MTL are shown in Figure 2. The spectra are complex due to numerous different types of functional groups on the surface of adsorbent. In the spectrum of ETL, the peaks can be assigned as follows, 3388 cm−1 was due to OH stretching, 2924 cm−1 due to CH stretching in CH, CH2 and CH3 groups, 1646 cm−1 due to C=O stretching in carbonyl group and 1078 cm−1 due to C-O stretching. After chemical modification the spectrum exhibits some significant changes. The broad band ranging from about 3118 to 3650 cm−1 corresponds to the combination of stretching vibration bands of both OH and NH groups suggesting that N-functional groups are introduced on the surface of the biosorbent. The peaks at 1450 cm−1 and 1033 cm−1 are due to the C-H bending and C-N stretching, respectively.

3.1.3. X-Ray Diffraction Analysis (XRD)

X-ray diffraction profiles of exhausted tea leaves and modified tea leaves are shown in Figure 3.

In the profile there are broad peaks with strongest reflection at 2θ around 22˚. The MTL shows less intense and broader peak than ETL which corresponds to the less crystalline structure. The increasing amorphous nature of biosorbent is highly suitable for metal adsorption.

3.1.4. Thermogravimetric Analysis (TG/DTA)

The thermal stability and degradation behavior of the biosorbents were evaluated by TGA under nitrogen atmosphere using a thermal analyser with increase in temperature of 10 min−1. The TGA and DTA curves for the adsorbents are shown in Figure 4.

The raw material degraded mainly in two stages. The first stage of decomposition started at around 260˚C and finally at 450˚C. The first stage corresponds to decomposition of lignocellulosic materials and the second corresponds to complete decomposition.

Figure 2. Drftir spectra of ETL and MTL.

Figure 3. XRD profile of ETL and MTL.

Similarly in modified adsorbent the first stage degradation begins at about 100˚C with weight loss of 5% - 10%. It is due to loss of residual or physically adsorbed water molecules. The second stage degradation occurs with rapid weight loss at 300˚C - 560˚C

(a)(b)

Figure 4. TG/DTA analysis (a) and (b) of ETL and MTL, respectively.

reaching a maximum value at 485˚C. It indicates the increasing thermal stability of the biosorbent after modification.

3.2. Adsorption Characters

3.2.1. Effect of pH

The percentage adsorption of Pb(II) and Cu(II) as the function of equilibrium pH are shown in Figure 5. The plot shows that the adsorption of metal ions increases with increase of pH. The optimum pH for uptake of Pb(II) and Cu(II) onto MTL were found to be at 4 and 5, respectively. The adsorption increases rapidly near the optimum pH range.

Figure 5. Adsorption of Pb(II) and Cu(II) onto MTL as the function of equilibrium pH. Adsorbent dose 25 mg, vol. of metal solution 20 mL and initial metal concentration 50 mL/L.

As the surface charge of the adsorbent changes with pH of solution and degree of ionization as well as the adsorbate species also depends upon solution pH, the adsorptive removal of metal ions depends upon the pH of the solution [24] [25] . The increase of sorption capacity with increase of pH of the solution can be explained on the basis of surface charge of the adsorbent and the degree of ionization. At low pH, highly mobile H+ would compete with metal ions for the active binding sites. Hence at low pH all the binding sites may be protonated which tends to decrease the metal sorption on the surface of the adsorbent. At higher pH, concentration of H+ as well as solubility of metals decrease which enhance the metal sorption on the surface of the adsorbent. Further increase in pH causes precipitation of metals as their hydroxide.

The pHpzc of an adsorbent is a very important characteristic that determines the pH at which the adsorbent surface has net electrical neutrality. The zeta potential of the ETL and MTL in the solution of different pH values are shown in Figure 6.

The zeta potentials of ETL are positive at pH < 5.9 and negative at pH > 5.9. After modification, the zeta potentials of MTL are negative at pH > 10 and positive at pH < 10. It indicates that the point of zero zeta potential for the ETL at 5.9 was changed to that for MTL around 10, due to surface modification [26] . The higher point of zero zeta potential for the adsorbent after modification may be due to protonation of N-atoms in the amine group introduced on the surface of the adsorbent.

3.2.2. Adsorption Isotherm

The study of adsorption isotherm evaluates the adsorption capacity of the adsorbent. Adsorption capacity is the concentration of metal ions on the adsorbent and can be

Figure 6. Zeta potentials of the ETL and MTL as the function of solution pH values.

calculated on the basis of mass balance principle as follows

(2)

where q is the amount of metal adsorbed per unit mass of the adsorbent, L is volume of metal solution, W is dry mass of the adsorbent and Ci and Ce are initial and final concentration of metal ions, respectively.

Langmuir adsorption isotherm has been widely used for many adsorption processes. The basic assumption of Langmuir adsorption theory is that the driving force of adsorption is concentration of metal ions in solution and the bare binding sites available on the surface of adsorbent. The adsorption takes place at specific binding sites available on the surface of the adsorbent and once the site is occupied by metal ions no further sorption can occur. Figure 7 shows the adsorption isotherms for Pb(II) and Cu(II) onto MTL.

In the plot, initially the adsorption of metal ions increases with increase in equilibrium concentration of metal ions. Eventually the uptake of metal ions is limited by the occupied binding sites and results in a plateau. It showed that the active sites of the adsorbent remaining constant, the adsorption are independent of the concentration of metal ions at high concentration of metal ions [27] [28] . The maximum adsorption capacities from the experimental results are 91.68 and 71.2 mg/g for Pb(II) and Cu(II), respectively.

The adsorption isotherms were evaluated using linearized Langmuir model by using Equation (3)

(3)

Figure 7. Effect of concentration on adsorption of Pb(II) and Cu(II) onto MTL. Adsorbent dose 25 mg, vol. of metal solution 20 mL at pH = 4 and 5 for respective metal ions.

where qe is amount adsorbed (mg/g), Ce is equilibrium concentration of metal ions (mg/L), qm (mg/g) is the maximum adsorption capacity and b (L/mg) is the binding constant. The linear plot of Ce/qe verses Ce as shown in Figure 8 suggests the applicability of Langmuir adsorption isotherm and indicates the formation of monolayer coverage of metal ions on the surface of adsorbent. Langmuir parameters qm and b were calculated from the slop and intercept of the plot. The values are given in Table 1 along with correlation coefficient R2.

The higher R2 values confirm the best fitting of Langmuir isotherm model. The comparable theoretical maximum adsorption capacity based on Langmuir adsorption equation with the experimental values suggests that the adsorbent can be used for effective sequestration of Pb(II) and Cu(II) from their aqueous solution.

3.2.3. Kinetics of Adsorption

The study of adsorption kinetics helps to evaluate the efficiency of adsorption. The effect of contact time on adsorption of Pb(II) and Cu(II) onto MTL is shown in Figure 9.

The plot consists of initial rapid phase where the rate of adsorption is fast. This rapid phase is related to external surface adsorption and occurs instantaneously. The initial high rate is due to the existence of the bare surface for metal binding. There is a slower second phase which is a gradual adsorption stage and equilibrium uptake was achieved. In this phase the adsorption of metal ions is limited due to the occupied surface of the adsorbent. The time to reach equilibrium is 100 - 150 min for the metal ions.

To describe the kinetics of adsorption, pseudo-second order kinetic model is applied

Figure 8. Langmuir isotherm for adsorption of Pb(II) and Cu(II) onto MTL.

Figure 9. Adsorption kinetics of Pb(II) and Cu(II) onto MTL. Adsorbent dose 25 mg, vol. of metal solution 20 mL at pH = 4 and 5 for respective metal ions.

[29] . The model can be expressed as

(4)

Table 1. Langmuir adsorption isotherm model parameters and experimental qmax.

where qt is the amount of metal ions adsorbed at time t (min) and K2 (g/mg/min) is the rate constant of pseudo-second order kinetics of adsorption. The plot of t/qt verses t is a straight line as shown in Figure 10.

The plot with high R2 values as given in Table 2, indicates the applicability of pseudo-second order model and chemisorptions of the adsorption of Pb(II) and Cu(II).

3.2.4. Comparison of the Adsorption Capacities

The metal adsorption capacity of MTL was compared with other biosorbents described in the literature. The different capabilities are due to presence of different functional groups on the surface of adsorbent. The values are given in Table 3. From the table MTL is found as an efficient biosorbent with higher metal binding capacity.

3.2.5. Desorption

For the use of cost effective biosorption process as an alternative in the waste water treatment scheme, the regeneration of biosorbent becomes crucially important for keeping the process cost down. For this purpose the adsorbed metals should be desorbed from the biosorbent and regenerated for another cycle of application [30] . After desorption, the metals can be recovered by extraction from the liquid phase.

In this experiment 0.1 g of the adsorbent was used for adsorption of lead at 100 ml/L in 80 ml of solution for 6 hrs. The adsorbent was regenerated with 0.1 M HNO3 and rinsed with double distilled water. After drying at 80˚C for 24 hrs, the adsorbent was used in subsequent adsorption experiment. In the first sorption cycle the adsorption capacity was found to be 58 mg/g for Pb(II) which was decreased to 56.40 mg/g in second cycle. Then the value remains almost constant for other successive adsorption-desorption cycles. It is observed that the regenerated adsorbent maintained high metal uptake capacity for lead. The metal desorbed by 0.1 M HNO3 from the adsorbent was found to be above 91% which remained almost constant over six cycles. It also indicates the chemical stability of adsorbent after modification. During the desorption experiments, the loss in dry weight of the adsorbent was less than 10%.

4. Conclusions

A new and efficient biosorbent has been investigated successfully by chemical modification of exhausted tea leaves. The surface of biosorbent was modified by introduction of N-functional groups using dimethylamine. The adsorbent was characterized by elemental analysis, SEM, DRFTIR, XRD and TG/DTA analysis. The optimum pH was found to be 4 and 5 for Pb(II) and Cu(II), respectively. The study of isotherms was well

Figure 10. Pseudo-second order kinetic model for adsorption of Pb(II) and Cu(II) onto MTL.

Table 2. Pseudo-second order kinetics for adsorption of Pb(II) and Cu(II) onto MTL.

Table 3. Comparision of adsorption capacities (mg/g) of different biosorbents for the removal of metal ions reported in the literatures.

fitted with Langmuir model. The metal adsorption process was found to follow pseudo- second order kinetic model with higher R2 values. The maximum sorption capacities for Pb(II) and Cu(II) were found to be 91.68 and 71.2 mg/g, respectively. After adsorption the biosorbent was successfully regenerated by 0.1 HNO3. The regenerated biosorbent can be used repeatedly for metal adsorption. These experimental results revealed that MTL can be used as an efficient biosorbent for the sequestration of Pb(II) and Cu(II) from their aqueous solution.

Acknowledgements

Authors gratefully acknowledge National Institute of Material Science (NIMS), Japan, for providing lab facility to carry out this research work.

Cite this paper

Shrestha, B., Kour, J. and Ghimire, K.N. (2016) Adsorptive Re- moval of Heavy Metals from Aqueous Solution with Environmental Friendly Material―Exhausted Tea Leaves. Advances in Che- mical Engineering and Science, 6, 525-540. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/aces.2016.64046

References

  1. 1. Babel, S. and Kurniawan, T.A. (2003) Low Cost Adsorbents for Heavy Metals Uptake from Contaminated Water: A Review. Journal of Hazardous Materials, B97, 219-243.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3894(02)00263-7

  2. 2. Nurchi, V.M. and Villaescusa, I. (2008) Agricultural Biomasses as Sorbents of Some Trace Metals. Coordination Chemistry Review, 252, 1178-1188.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2007.09.023

  3. 3. Sun, G. and Shi, W. (1998) Sunflower Stalks as Adsorbents for the Removal of Metal Ions from Wastewater. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 37, 1324-1328.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ie970468j

  4. 4. Igwe, J.C. and Abia, A.A. (2006) A Bioseparation Process for Removing Heavy Metals from Wastewater Using Biosorbents—Review. African Journal of Biotechnology, 5, 1167-1179.

  5. 5. Volesky, B. and Holan, Z.R. (1995) Biosorption of Heavy Metals. Biotechnology Progress, 11, 235-250.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/bp00033a001

  6. 6. Das, N., Vimala, R. and Karthika, P. (2008) Biosorption of Heavy Metals—An Overview. Indian Journal of Biotechnology, 7, 159-169.

  7. 7. Wan Ngah, W.S. and Hanafiah, M.A.K.M. (2008) Removal of Heavy Metal Ions from Wastewater by Chemically Modified Plant Wastes as Adsorbents: A Review. Bioresource Technology, 99, 3935-3948.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.06.011

  8. 8. Ghimire, K.N., Inoue, K., Ohto, K. and Hayashida, T. (2007) Adsorptive Separation of Metallic Pollutants onto Waste Seaweeds, Porphyra yezoensis and Ulva japonica. Separation Science and Technology, 42, 2003-2018.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15363830701313461

  9. 9. Biswas, B.K., Inoue, K., Ghimire, K.N., Harada, H., Ohto, K. and Kawakita, H. (2008) Removal and Recovery of Phosphorus from Water by Means of Adsorption onto Orange Waste Gel Loaded with Zirconium. Bioresource Technology, 99, 8685-8690.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.04.015

  10. 10. Deng, S., Bai, R. and Chen, J.P. (2003) Aminated Polyacrylonitrile Fibers for Lead and Copper Removal. Langmuir, 19, 5058-5064.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/la034061x

  11. 11. Kour, J., Homagai, P.L., Cagnin, N., Masi, A., Pokhrel, M.R. and Ghimire, K.N. (2013) Adsorption of Cd(II), Cu(II), and Zn(II) from Aqueous Solution onto Nitrogen-Functionalized Desmostachya bipinnata. Journal of Chemistry, 2013, Article ID: 649142.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/649142

  12. 12. Homagai, P.L., Ghimire, K.N. and Inoue, K. (2011) Preparation and Characterization of Charred Xanthated Sugarcane Bagasse for the Separation of Heavy Metals from Aqueous Solutions. Separation Science and Technology, 46, 330-339.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01496395.2010.506903

  13. 13. Nietoa, L.M., Alamia, S.B.D., Hodaifab, G., Faurc, C., Rodrigueza, S., Gimeneza, J.A. and Ochandoa, J. (2010) Adsorption of Iron on Crude Olive Stones. Industrial Crops and Products, 32, 467-471.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2010.06.017

  14. 14. Demirbas, A. (2008) Heavy Metal Adsorption onto Agrobased Waste Materials: A Review. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 157, 220-229.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.01.024

  15. 15. Mahvi, A.H., Naghipour, D., Vaezi, F. and Nazmara, S. (2005) Teawaste as an Adsorbent for Heavy Metal Removal from Industrial Wastewaters. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 2, 372.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.3844/ajassp.2005.372.375

  16. 16. Chen, S., Yue, Q., Gao, B. and Xu, X. (2010) Equilibrium and Kinetic Adsorption Study of the Adsorptive Removal of Cr (VI) Using Modified Wheat Residue. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 349, 256-264.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2010.05.057

  17. 17. Amarasinghe, B.M.W.P.K. and Williams, R.A. (2007) Tea Waste as a Low Cost Adsorbent for the Removal of Cu and Pb from Wastewater. Chemical Engineering Journal, 132, 299-309.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2007.01.016

  18. 18. Islam, T.A., Begum, H.A., Hossain, M.A. and Rahman, M.T. (2009) Removal of Pb(II) from Aqueous Solution by Sorption on Used Tea Leaves. Journal of Bangladesh Academy of Sciences, 33, 167-178.

  19. 19. Shrestha, B., Homagai, P.L., Pokhrel, M.R. and Ghimire, K.N. (2012) Adsorptive Removal of Toxic Metal from Aqueous Solution by Using a Biowaste Used Tea Leaves. Nepal Journal of Science and Technology, 13, 109-114.

  20. 20. Sankaramakrishnan, N. and Sanghi, R. (2006) Preparation and Characterization of a Novel Xanthated Chitosan. Carbohydrate Polymers, 6, 160-167.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2006.02.035

  21. 21. Moussavi, G. and Khosravi, R. (2010) Removal of Cyanide from Wastewater by Adsorption onto Pistachio Hull Wastes: Parametric Experiments, Kinetics and Equilibrium Analysis. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 183, 724-730.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.07.086

  22. 22. Shriner, R.L., Hermann, C.K.F., Morill, T.C., Curtin, D.Y. and Fuson, R.C. (1998) The Systematic Identification of Organic Compounds. 7th Edition, Wiley, New York.

  23. 23. Pavasant, P., Apiratikul, R., Sungkhum, V., Suthiparinyanont, P., Wattanachira, S. and Marhaba, T.F. (2006) Biosorption of Cu2+, Cd2+, Pb2+ and Zn2+ Using Dried Marine Green Macroalga Caulerpa lentillifera. Bioresource Technology, 97, 2321-2329.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2005.10.032

  24. 24. Ayyappan, R., Sophia, A.C., Swaminathan, K. and Shandhya, S. (2005) Removal of Pb(II) from Aqueous Solution Using Carbon Derived from Agricultural Wastes. Process Biochemistry, 40, 1293-1299.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2004.05.007

  25. 25. Krowiak, A.W., Szafran, R.G. and Modlski, S. (2011) Biosorption of Heavy Metals from Aqueous Solutions onto Peanut Shell as a Low-Cost Biosorbent. Desalination, 265, 126-134.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2010.07.042

  26. 26. Langmuir, I. (1916) The Constitution and Fundamental Properties of Solids and Liquids. Journal of American Chemical Society, 38, 2221-2295.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja02268a002

  27. 27. Miretzky, P., Munoz, C. and Chavez, A.C. (2008) Experimental Binding of Lead to a Low Cost Biosorbent: Nopal (Opuntia streptacantha). Bioresource Technology, 99, 1211-1217.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.02.045

  28. 28. Blazquez, G., Hernainz, F., Calero, M. and Ruiz-Nunez, L.F. (2005) Removal of Cadmium Ions with Olive Stone: The Effect of Some Parameters. Process Biochemistry, 40, 2649-2655.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2004.11.007

  29. 29. Ho, Y.S. and McKay, G. (1999) Pseudo-Second Order Model for Sorption Processes. Process Biochemistry, 34, 451-465.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0032-9592(98)00112-5

  30. 30. Vijayarhavan, K., Palanivelu, K. and Veian, M. (2006) Biosorption of Copper(II) and Cobalt(II) from Aqueous Solutions by Crab Shell Particles. Bioresource Technology, 97, 1411-1419.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2005.07.001

  31. 31. Li, Q., Zhai, J., Zhang, W., Wang, M. and Zhou, J. (2006) Kinetic Studies of Adsorption of Pb(II), Cr(II) and Cu(II) from Aqueous Solution by Sawdust and Modified Peanut Husk. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 141, 163-167.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.06.109

  32. 32. Tiemann, K.J., Gamez, G., Dokken, K., Parsons, J.G. and Gardea-Torresdey, J.L. (2002) Chemical Modification and X-Ray Absorption Studies for Lead(II) Binding by Medicago sativa (Alfalfa) Biomass. Microchemical Journal, 71, 287-293.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0026-265X(02)00021-8

  33. 33. Wankasi, D., Horsfall, J.M. and Spiff, A.I. (2006) Sorption Kinetics of Pb2+ and Cu2+ Ions from Aqueous Solution by Nipah palm (Nypa fruticans Wurmb) Shoot Biomass. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology, 9, 587-592.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.2225/vol9-issue5-fulltext-5

  34. 34. Ganji, M.T., Khosravi, M. and Rakhsaee, R. (2005) Biosorption of Pb, Cd, Cu and Zn from Wastewater by Treated Azolla filiculoides with H2O2/MgCl2. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 1, 265-271.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF03325841

Journal Menu >>