Advances in Chemical Engineering and Science
Vol.06 No.04(2016), Article ID:71182,18 pages

Removal of Ag(I) from Aqueous Solution by Japanese Natural Clinoptilolite

Takaaki Wajima

Department of Urban Environment Systems, Graduate School of Engineering, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan

Copyright © 2016 by author and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY 4.0).

Received: August 17, 2016; Accepted: October 9, 2016; Published: October 12, 2016


The present study examined the adsorption of silver ion in aqueous solution onto natural clinoptilolite zeolite from Futatsui Mine, Akita Prefecture, Japan. The effects of various parameters, i.e., solution pH, adsorbent dosage, adsorption time, silver ion solution concentration, and temperature, on silver ion adsorption process onto clinoptilolite were examined. Additionally, the thermodynamics of the silver ion adsorption process was investigated. The optimum pH for silver adsorption was determined to be around 4.0. The adsorption process could be well described by the Langmuir isotherm model. The calculated maximum adsorption capacity was 0.64 mmol/g. Adsorption kinetics studies were also conducted. The results showed that the adsorption process preferentially followed the pseudo-second-order kinetics model over the pseudo-first-order model. Furthermore, with decreasing aqueous solution temperatures, the adsorption kinetics became slower and the amount of silver ion adsorbed increased. The thermodynamic values, ΔG0, ΔH0, and ΔS0, indicated that adsorption was an exothermic and spontaneous process.


Clinoptilolite, Ag(I) Removal, Adsorption, Natural Zeolite

1. Introduction

The removal of metal ions from industrial wastewaters using different adsorbents is always of great interest [1] [2] because industrial wastewaters often contain considerable amounts of metal ions that could pose a potential threat to the public health and environment if discharged without adequate treatment. High concentrations of problematic metals in solution can affect humans, animals, and vegetation. The pollution of water and soil by metal cations increases proportionally with the expansion of industrial activities [3] [4] . To minimize the costs associated with the treatment of such industrial wastewaters, most of the last investigations have focused on the use of low-cost adsorbents [5] [6] .

In recent years, the use of natural zeolites to control heavy metal ions pollution of effluents has increased. Natural zeolites have ion-exchange capabilities toward removing metal ions, thus making them suitable for use in wastewater treatment. In addition, natural zeolites are considered to be inexpensive [7] [8] . Zeolites are a naturally occurring crystalline aluminosilicate that consists of a framework of tetrahedral molecules, linked with each other by shared oxygen atoms, exchangeable alkaline and alkaline earth metal cations (typically Na+, K+, Ca2+, Mg2+), and water. Additionally, zeolites have a porous structure, enclosing interconnected cavities within which metal ions and water molecules are contained [9] . The fundamental building block of zeolites is a tetrahedron of four oxygen atoms surrounding a relatively small silicon or aluminum atom. Because aluminum has one less positive charge than silicon, the framework has a net negative charge of one at each aluminum atom site and is balanced by the exchangeable cation [10] . Clinoptilolite, thomsonite, gismondine, and gonnardite are common known natural zeolites. Clinoptilolite is the most abundant in nature and has a typical chemical formula of Na6Al6Si30O72・24H2O [11] [12] . The chemical, surface, and ion- exchange properties of clinoptilolite have been examined in many studies [13] - [16] . For example, the selectivity of Na-form clinoptilolite toward Pb2+, Cd2+, Cs+, Cu2+, Co2+, Cr3+, Zn2+, Ni2+, Hg2+ was determined [17] .

Silver is commonly used as a raw material in various industries owing to its excellent malleability, ductility, electrical and thermal conductivity, photosensitivity, and antimicrobial properties. Accordingly, copious amounts of silver are lost in the effluents discharged from such industries, and owing to its toxicity to living organisms, the removal of silver from wastewaters is important. Available technologies for the removal of silver include precipitation, electrolysis, and solvent extraction, and processes that use ion exchange resins and chelating agents. These methods can be used profitably on a large scale when metal effluent concentrations are sufficiently high, i.e., >100 ppm [18] - [21] . To minimize processing costs and to reduce the metal concentration in industrial wastewaters, most recent investigations have focused on the use of low-cost adsorbents such as zeolites [22] [23] .

Additionally, it has been reported that silver-zeolite composites can inhibit bacterial growth under aerobic [24] and anaerobic conditions [25] . Some of the microorganisms existing in our living environment assist in ecological cycles, while others are responsible for diseases in people, animals, and plants [26] . Microorganism growth and death are influenced by environmental factors such as temperature, pH, oxygen level, pressure, and light irradiation. Antimicrobial agents, such as alcohols, phenols, halogenated compounds, quaternary ammonium salts, heavy metal ions (Ag+, Zn2+, Cu2+, Fe2+/3+, Cd2+, Pd2+), silver nanoparticles, metal oxides (ZnO, MgO, Ag2O) and zirconium phosphates, and oxidizing agents (ozone, chlorine and its derivates), heat, and UV light are used to prevent contamination or sterilize contaminated materials [27] - [37] . Owing to its broad-spectrum antibacterial and antimicrobial properties, lack of toxicity to humans, high degree of biocompatibility, excellent resistance to sterilization conditions, and long-term antibacterial efficiency, silver either in metallic and nanoparticle form or as an ion is the most frequently used antibacterial agent for controlling bacterial growth [27] [31] [36] - [43] . An antibacterial agent such as a silver plate, silver nitrate solution, or silver sulfadiazine could be used directly but is not preferred because of its high cost. Alternatively, preparing antibacterial silver as a supported material with a high specific surface area and porosity is preferable. Examples of carrier support material for silver include polymers [29] [44] - [47] , metal oxides [48] [49] , silica [50] [51] , glass [52] [53] , clay [47] [54] [55] , synthetic zeolites (such as LTA [44] [56] - [61] , LTX [56] [62] , LTY [56] , and ETS-10 [63] ), and natural zeolites (such as mordenite [56] and clinoptilolite [31] [64] - [69] ). These exemplified supports are the most common and economical carriers owing to their user-friendly handling, nontoxicity, and controlled long-term release rate.

In the present study, we examined the potential of locally available natural zeolite, clinoptilolite, for the removal of Ag+ from aqueous solution and optimization of conditions for its maximum adsorption. The effects of various parameters, i.e., pH, adsorbent dosage, initial solution concentration, reaction time, and temperature, on the Ag+ adsorption process were investigated to evaluate the adsorption properties of clinoptilolite as Ag-supported material for use either as a bactericide or for the removal of Ag+ from polluted industrial waters. Additionally, the thermodynamics and kinetics of Ag+ adsorption onto clinoptilolite were investigated.

2. Experimental

2.1. Zeolite Sample

The zeolite sample (clinoptilolite) used in this study was obtained from Futatsui mine, Akita prefecture, Japan. Before the experiments, clinoptilolite was ground to a certain particle size (<250 μm) and dried at 80˚C in a drying oven overnight. Table 1 shows the exchangeable cations and cation exchange capacity of clinoptilolite determined using a modified Schollenberger method [70] . The cation exchange capacity (1.67 mmol/g) is relatively high, and most of the exchangeable cation sites are occupied by Na+ and K+.

2.2. Adsorption Studies

Ag+ solution was prepared from its nitrate salt, AgNO3 (>99% purity, Wako, Japan), and distilled water. The amount of Ag+ adsorbed on unit mass clinoptilolite at equilibrium, qe (mmol/g), and the Ag+ removal from solution, R (%), were calculated from changes in the Ag+ concentration in the medium by considering the adsorption volume

Table 1. Exchangeable cations and cation exchange capacity of natural clinoptilolite zeolite (mmol/g).

and amount of zeolite sample used:

, (1)

, (2)

and Ci and Ce are the Ag+ concentrations in the solution before and after adsorption for a certain adsorption time, respectively (mM), m (g) is the mass of zeolite, and V (L) is the Ag solution volume.

2.2.1. Effect of Solution pH

The effect of solution pH on Ag adsorption was investigated using 0.5 mM AgNO3 solution over a pH range of 1 - 8. The pH of the Ag solution was adjusted with HNO3 solution. Adsorption tests were conducted in 50-mL polypropylene centrifuged tubes. In each adsorption run, 0.1 g zeolite was added to 20 mL Ag+ solution at room temperature, and the tube was shaken using a reciprocal shaker (200 rpm). After 2 h of mixing, the aqueous phase was separated from the solid (adsorbent) by centrifugation (3000 rpm, 10 min), the pH of the supernatant was measured by a pH meter (Horiba, D-53, Japan) and the concentration of Ag+ in the supernatant was determined by inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES; Seiko, SPS5510, Japan) to determine qe.

2.2.2. Effect of Adsorbent Dosage

The effect of adsorbent dosage on Ag+ removal was determined using 0.5 mM AgNO3 solution. The zeolite sample at varying amounts of 0.02 - 0.2 g was added to 20 mL Ag+ solution in a tube at room temperature, and the tube was shaken for 2 h with a reciprocal shaker as per the above procedure. After shaking, the aqueous phase was separated from the solid by centrifugation as per the above procedure. The pH of the supernatant was measured using a pH meter, and the concentration of silver ion in the supernatant was determined using ICP-AES to calculate R.

2.2.3. Effect of Initial Ag+ Solution Concentration

The effect of initial Ag+ solution concentration on the adsorption capacity of clinoptilolite was determined using solutions of concentrations ranging from 0.1 to 5 mM. First, 0.1 g zeolite sample was added to 20 mL Ag+ solution in a tube at room temperature, and the tube was shaken for 2 h as per the above procedure. After shaking, the aqueous phase was separated from the solid by centrifugation as per the above procedure, and the Ag+ supernatant concentration was determined by ICP-AES to calculate qe and R.

2.2.4. Effect of Temperature on Adsorption Time

To determine the adsorption time of Ag+ from aqueous solution onto clinoptilolite, 1 g zeolite sample was added to 200 mL (1 mM) AgNO3 solution in a 500-mL glass beaker, and the mixture was stirred using a magnetic stirrer at 20˚C. While stirring, 2-mL aliquots were sampled from the solution at varying times, and the Ag+ concentration in the filtrate was determined by ICP-AES to calculate the amount of Ag+ adsorbed on the zeolite at a sampling time t, qt, using the difference between initial Ag+ concentration and the Ag+ concentration at sampling times. To study the effect of temperature on the adsorption time, the experiments were conducted at two additional temperatures, i.e., 30˚C and 40˚C.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Silver Adsorption

Solution pH is an important factor that influences (Ag+) adsorption at solid-liquid interfaces. The pH dependence of Ag+ adsorption onto zeolite is shown in Figure 1. Experiments were conducted using silver ion solutions at different pH values. As observed, Ag+ adsorption uptake, qe, was low at low pHs, then increased with increasing pHs before decreasing with further increased in pH (>4), and subsequently reached a plateau at pH > 6.0. The highest qe was obtained at equilibrium pH of around 4. These results agreed with the results of several investigations on Ag+ removal [71] - [75] . These studies attributed the low adsorption capacity at pH < 4 to the competition between protons and Ag+ for the exchange sites on the zeolite particle [76] [77] . With increasing pHs, precipitation of Ag on the zeolite at higher pH values can occur, thereby decreasing the adsorption/ion exchange uptake to reach equilibrium Ag+ concentration.

Figure 2 shows the change in the solution equilibrium pH as a function of solution initial pH. The solution equilibrium pH increased when the initial pH was between 2 and 6. These results show that the zeolite has a negative surface charge at a pH of ~2 and that the lower uptake results from competition between the Ag+ and H+ ions for the adsorption/exchange sites. In the pH range of 2 - 6, Ag+ uptake is accompanied by an increase in solution pH. Ag+ uptake is believed to proceed via ion exchange and/or adsorption mechanism. However, this increase in pH suggests that the reaction likely proceeds via an ion exchange mechanism and exchangeable cations are released in the aqueous solution.

Figure 3 illustrates the effect of adsorbent dosage on the solution pH and silver

Figure 1. pH dependence of silver adsorption on natural clinoptilolite zeolite.

Figure 2. Variations in solution equilibrium pH as a function of solution initial pH.

Figure 3. Effect of adsorbent dosage on solution pH and silver removal by clinoptilolite.

removal by clinoptilolite. With an increase in dosage, both the removal percentage and solution pH increased to approximately 95% and from 3 to 4, respectively. This result indicates that adsorbent dosages greater than 5 g/L are suitable to achieve efficient removal of silver from the solution.

Subsequently, the effect of varying the initial Ag+ solution concentration (0.2 - 5 mM) on the Ag+ uptake and removal from the solution was examined, and the results are shown in Figure 4. With increasing initial Ag+ solution concentrations, the adsorption capacity increased, whereas the Ag+ removal percentage decreased. These results indicate that energetically less favorable sites become involved with increasing Ag+ concentrations in the aqueous solution.

Figure 6 shows the adsorption profiles of Ag+ onto the zeolite sample at varying reaction temperatures of 20˚C, 30˚C, and 40˚C. The slopes of the lines joining the data points in the figure reflect the adsorption rates. As observed from Figure 5, with increasing solution temperatures, the uptake of Ag+ decreased. However, the adsorption time was faster at the higher solution temperatures. Specifically, at 30˚C and 40˚C, the amount of adsorbed Ag+ increased rapidly before reaching an equilibrium value after 20 min. In contrast, at a solution temperature of 20˚C, an equilibrium value was attained after 45 min. In a previous study, several adsorbents were examined toward the removal of Ag+; an equilibrium adsorption time of 5 h was reported [78] . Short adsorption times are preferred owing to the lower energy consumption requirements. Thus, comparison between the adsorbents studied in the literature [78] and the present zeolite reveals that the latter is more efficient owing to the shorter adsorption time.

3.2. Adsorption Isotherm and Kinetics Studies

Figure 6 shows the silver adsorption isotherm of the zeolite sample. With increasing

Figure 4. Variations in the silver ion uptake and silver removal as a function of initial silver ion solution concentration.

Figure 5. Silver ion adsorption on clinoptilolite at 20˚C, 30˚C, and 40˚C as a function of reaction time.

Figure 6. Silver ion adsorption capacity of clinoptilolite.

equilibrium concentrations, the silver ion uptake increased to approximately 0.6 mmol/g before reaching a plateau.

The equilibrium distribution of Ag+ between the zeolite and solution is important in determining the maximum sorption capacity. Several isotherm models are available to describe the equilibrium sorption distribution. In the present study, two models, i.e., Langmuir and Freundlich, were used to fit the experimental data.

The linear form of the Langmuir model can be expressed as follows:


where Qmax (mmol/g) and KL (L/mmol) are Langmuir constants related to the maximum adsorption capacity corresponding to complete coverage of available adsorption sites and a measure of adsorption energy (equilibrium adsorption constant), respectively. These constants can be respectively determined from the slope and intercept of the linear plot of Ce/qe vs. Ce so that Qmax = 1/slope and KL = slope/intercept.

The linear form of the Freundlich model can be expressed as follows:


where KF and n are Freundlich constants determined from the slope and intercept of the plot of ln(qe) vs. ln(Ce).

The Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm models were applied to the experimental data presented in Figure 5, and the associated parameters calculated from the fitted data are shown in Table 2. As observed from Table 2, the Langmuir model fitted the data better than the Freundlich model owing to the higher correlation regression coefficient R2 (measure of the goodness-of-fit) of the data fitted with the Langmuir model. As discussed in a previous study [79] , the uptake of various metals by natural zeolite can be attributed to different ion-exchange mechanisms and adsorption processes. Qmax, as calculated from the Langmuir isotherm model, was 0.64 mmol/g. The Qmax value obtained here is comparable with those reported in the literature. For instance,

Table 2. Langmuir- and Freundlich-fitted adsorption parameters and associated correlation regression coefficients.

the adsorption of Ag+ onto H-Na-ZDM-5 zeolite [80] , mordenite [81] , different types of chitosan [82] , and coal [83] generated maximum adsorption capacities of 0.57, 0.04 - 0.21, 0.4, and 0.017 mmol/g adsorbent, respectively.

The kinetics adsorption data obtained from Figure 5 were analyzed using different kinetics models, i.e., the Lagergren pseudo-first-order [84] - [86] and pseudo-second- order [87] - [102] models. The Lagergren pseudo-first-order model can be described as follows:


where qt (mmol of Ag+/g zeolite) is the amount of Ag+ adsorbed on the zeolite at time t and k1 (min−1) is the adsorption rate constant. Parameters k1 and ln(qe) can be respectively deduced from the slope and intercept of the linear plot of vs. t.

The linear form of the pseudo-second-order model can be expressed as follows:


where k2 (g/mmol min) is the adsorption rate constant, and k2 and qe can respectively be determined from the intercept and slope of the plot of t/qt vs. t so that qe = 1/slope and k2 = slope2/intercept. The rate constants of the pseudo-first-order, k1, and pseudo-second-order, k2, reaction for Ag+ adsorption were determined from Figure 6. The values of k1, k2, R2, and qe (i.e., qe,1 and qe,2) are presented in Table 3. Comparison of the R2 values reveals that the adsorption process follows the pseudo-second-order model better than the pseudo-first-order model.

As can be deduced from Table 3, qe,2 and k2 were dependent on the reaction temperature. To gain insights into the thermodynamic nature of the adsorption process, several thermodynamic parameters were calculated. The Gibbs free energy change, ΔG0, was negative, as calculated from the following equation:


where Kc is the adsorption equilibrium constant, R (8.314 J/(mol×K)) is the gas constant, and T (K) is the absolute temperature. Kc can be calculated as follows:


where Fe is the fraction of Ag+ adsorbed at equilibrium and is obtained by the expression:


Parameters C0 and Ce are the initial and equilibrium concentrations of Ag+ in solution (mmol/L).

Table 3. Adsorption kinetics parameters and associated correlation regression coefficients.

The Kc values associated with the adsorption of Ag+ on the zeolite at different temperatures were calculated using Equations (8) and (9), and the results are presented in Table 4. The Kc value obtained at 20˚C was higher than those at 30˚C and 40˚C. This result implies the strengthening of the adsorbate-adsorbent interactions at the lower temperature of 20˚C. Additionally, the obtained negative ΔG0 values confirmed the feasibility and spontaneous nature of the adsorption process.

The Gibbs free energy can also be represented as follows:


The enthalpy change (ΔH0) and entropy change (ΔS0) change, which were calculated from the intercept and slope of the plot of ΔG0 versus T, are presented in Table 4. The negative ΔH0 value obtained confirmed the exothermic nature of the adsorption process. The negative ΔS0 value indicated the decrease in the degree of randomness at the solid-solution interface with some structural changes in the adsorbate and adsorbent.

The activation energy related to the silver adsorption on clinoptilolite was calculated by the Arrhenius equation:


where ΔE (kJ/mol) is the activation energy, A is the frequency factor, T (K) is the absolute temperature, and R is the gas constant. From the plot of ln(k2) vs. 1/T (Figure 7), the activation energy for the adsorption of silver was found to be 116 kJ/mol.

4. Conclusion

In the present study, the interaction between Ag+ and clinoptilolite zeolite was investigated. The results indicated that several factors, i.e., pH, adsorbent dosage, adsorption time, initial Ag+ solution concentration, and temperature, influenced the adsorption process. Of particular interest, the amount of Ag+ adsorbed on clinoptilolite was highest at around pH 4, and the Ag+ uptake increased with decreasing solution temperatures. The experimental data were fitted with the Langmuir and Freundlich adsorption isotherm models. The results revealed that the process was best described by the Langmuir model. The maximum adsorption capacity of the zeolite, as calculated from the Langmuir model, was 0.64 mmol/g. The Ag+ adsorption kinetics from aqueous solution followed the pseudo-second-order model. The thermodynamic studies revealed that Ag+

Table 4. Thermodynamics parameters of silver ion adsorption on clinoptilolite.

Figure 7. Arrhenius plot of silver adsorption on clinoptilolite.

adsorption on the zeolite was an exothermic and spontaneous process. In summary, the current findings demonstrate the potential of Japanese clinoptilolite as a suitable and efficient material for the removal of Ag+ from aqueous solution.

Cite this paper

Wajima, T. (2016) Removal of Ag(I) from Aqueous Solution by Japanese Natural Clinoptilolite. Advances in Chemical Engineering and Science, 6, 470- 487.


  1. 1. Abollino, O., Aceto, M., Sarzanini, C. and Mentasti, E. (2000) The Retention of Metal Species by Different Solid Sorbents: Mechanism for Heavy Metal Speciation by Sequential Three Column Uptake. Analytica Chimica Acta, 411, 223-237.

  2. 2. Huang, C.P., Tsong, M.W. and Hsieh, Y.S. (1985) AIChE Symposium Series Heavy Metal Separation Processes. In: Peters, K. and Bhattaacharya, D., Eds., American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York.

  3. 3. Alloway, B.J. and Ayres, D.C. (1993) Chemical Principles of Environmental Pollution. Blackie Academic & Professional, London.

  4. 4. Abbasi, S.A., Abbasi, N. and Soni, R. (1998) Heavy Metals in the Environment. Mittal, New Delhi.

  5. 5. Al-Haj Ali, A. and El-Bishtawi, R. (1997) Removal of Lead and Nickel Ions Using Zeolite Tuff. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, 69, 27-34.<27::AID-JCTB682>3.0.CO;2-J

  6. 6. Sanchez, A.G., Ayuso, E.A. and Blass, O.J. (1999) Sorption of Heavy Metals from Industrial Waste Water by Low-Cost Mineral Silicates. Clay Minerals, 34, 469-477.

  7. 7. Grant, D.C., Skriba, M.C. and Saha, A.K. (1987) Removal of Radioactive Contaminants from West Valley Waste Streams Using Natural Zeolites. Environmental Progress, 6, 104- 109.

  8. 8. Virta, R. (2001) USGS Minerals Information, US Geological Survey Min. Commodity Summary 2000, January 2001.

  9. 9. Ouki, S. and Kavannagh, M. (1997) Performance of Natural Zeolites for the Treatment of Mixed Metal-Contaminated Effluents. Waste Management and Research, 15, 383-394.

  10. 10. Sheppard, R.A. (1976) Zeolites in Sedimentary Deposits of the Northwestern United States—Potential Industrial Minerals. Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology, 74, 69.

  11. 11. Bish, D.L. and Ming, D.W. (2001) Natural Zeolite: Occurrence, Properties, Applications. Mineralogical Society of America, Washington.

  12. 12. Breck, D.W. (1974) Zeolite Molecular Sieves. Wiley, New York.

  13. 13. Mondale, K.D., Carland, R.M. and Aplan, F.F. (1995) The Comparative Ion Exchange Capacities of Natural Sedimentary and Synthetic Zeolites. Minerals Engineering, 8, 535-548.

  14. 14. Carland, R.M. and Aplan, F.F. (1995) Use of Natural Sedimentary Zeolites for Metal Ion Recovery from Hydrometallurgical Solutions and for the Environmental Remediation of Acid Mine Drainage. Proceedings of the 19th International Mineral Processing Congress, San Francisco, 22-27 October 1995, 210.

  15. 15. Joshi, M.S. and Mohan, R.P. (1983) Cation Sieve Properties of Natural Heulandite. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 95, 131-134.

  16. 16. Blanchard, G., Maunaye, M. and Martin, G. (1984) Removal of Heavy Metals from Waters by Means of Natural Zeolites. Water Research, 18, 1501-1507.

  17. 17. Zamzow, M.J., Eichbaum, B.R., Sandgren, K.R. and Shanks, D.E. (1990) Removal of Heavy Metals and Other Cations from Wastewater Using Zeolites. Separation Science and Technology, 25, 1555-1569.

  18. 18. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (1977) Manual of Treatment Techniques for Meeting in Interim Primary Drinking Water Regulation. EPA, Cincinnati.

  19. 19. Kapoor, A. and Viraraghavan, T. (1995) Fungal Biosorption—An Alternative Treatment Option for Heavy Metal Bearing Wastewaters: A Review. Bioresource Technology, 53, 195-206.

  20. 20. Modak, J.M. and Natarajan, K.A. (1995) Biosorption of Metals Using Nonliving Biomass— A Review. Minerals and Metallurgical Processing, 12, 189-195.

  21. 21. Volesky, B. (1999) Biohydrometallurgy and the Environment toward the Mining of the 21st Century, Part B. In: Amils, R. and Ballester, A., Eds., Proceedings of the International Biohydrometallurgy Symposium, Elsevier, Amsterdam.

  22. 22. Hashemian, S., Hosseini, S.H., Salehifar, H. and Salari, K. (2013) Adsorption of Fe(III) from Aqueous Solution by Linde Type-A Zeolite. American Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 4, 123-126.

  23. 23. Chmielewska, E. (1999) Environmental Zeolites and Aqueous Media: Examples of Practical Solutions. Bentham Books, Beijing.

  24. 24. Inoue, Y., Hoshino, M., Takahashi, H., Naguchi, T., Murata, T., Kanzaki, Y., Hamashima, H. and Sasatsu, M. (2002) Bactericidal Activity of Ag-Zeolite Mediated by Reactive Oxygen Species under Aerated Conditions. Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry, 92, 37-42.

  25. 25. Kawahara, K., Tsuruda, K., Morishita, M. and Uchida, M. (2000) Antibacterial Effect of Silver-Zeolite on Oral Bacteria under Anaerobic Conditions. Dental Materials, 16, 452-455.

  26. 26. Alcamo, I.E. (2004) Microbes and Society: An Introduction to Microbiology. Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Sudbury.

  27. 27. Landsdown, A.B. (2002) Silver I: Its Antibacterial Properties and Mechanism of Action. Journal of Wound Care, 11, 125-130.

  28. 28. Grujer, N. and Von-Guten, U. (2003) A Stochastic Model of an Ozonation Reactor. Water Research, 37, 1667-1677.

  29. 29. Joyakumar, R., Lee, Y.S., Rajkumar, M. and Najundan, S. (2004) Synthesis, Characterization and Antibacterial Activity of Metal-Containing Polyurethanes. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 91, 288-295.

  30. 30. Sondi, I. and Salopek-Sondi, B. (2004) Silver Nanoparticles as Antimicrobial Agent: A Case Study on E. coli as a Model for Gram-Negative Bacteria. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 275, 177-182.

  31. 31. Top, A. and ülkü, S. (2004) Silver, Zinc and Copper Exchange in a Na-Clinoptilolite and Resulting Effect on Antibacterial Activity. Applied Clay Science, 27, 13-19.

  32. 32. Koivunen, J. and Heinonen-Tanski, H. (2005) Inactivation of Enteric Microorganisms with Chemical Disinfectants, UV Irradiation and Combined Chemical/UV Treatments. Water Research, 39, 1519-1526.

  33. 33. Son, H., Cho, M., Kim, J., Oh, B., Chung, H. and Yoon, J. (2005) Enhanced Disinfection Efficiency of Mechanically Mixed Oxidants with Free Chlorine. Water Research, 39, 721-727.

  34. 34. Jiang, S., Wang, L., Yu, H., Chen, Y. and Shi, Q. (2006) Study on Antibacterial Behavior of Insoluble Quaternary Ammonium. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 99, 2389-2394.

  35. 35. Song, H.Y., Ko, K.K., Oh, I.H. and Lee, B.T. (2006) Fabrication of Silver Nanoparticles and their Antimicrobial Mechanisms. European Cells and Materials, 11, 58.

  36. 36. Silvestry-Rodriguez, N., Sicairos-Ruelas, E.E., Gerba, C.P. and Bright, K.R. (2007) Silver as a Disinfectant. In: Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology Vol. 191, Springer, New York, 23-45.

  37. 37. Chen, X. and Schluesener, H.J. (2008) Nanosilver: A Nanoproduct in Medical Application. Toxicology Letters, 176, 1-12.

  38. 38. Russell, A.D. and Hugo, W.B. (1994) Antimicrobial Activity and Action of Silver. Progress in Medicinal Chemistry, 31, 351-370.

  39. 39. Rai, M., Yadav, A. and Gade, A. (2009) Silver Nanoparticles as a New Generation of Antimicrobials. Biotechnology Advances, 27, 76-83.

  40. 40. Feng, Q.L., Wu, J., Chen, G.Q., Cui, F.Z., Kim, T.N. and Kim, J.O. (2000) A Mechanistic Study of the Antibacterial Effect of Silver Ions on Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 52, 662-668.<662::AID-JBM10>3.0.CO;2-3

  41. 41. Kawashita, M., Tsuneyama, S., Miyaji, F., Kokubo, T., Kozuka, H. and Yamamoto, K. (2000) Antibacterial Silver-Containing Silica Glass Prepared by Sol-Gel Method. Biomaterials, 21, 393-398.

  42. 42. Lanje, A.S., Sharma, S.J. and Pode, R.B. (2010) Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles: A Safer Alternative to Conventional Antimicrobial and Antibacterial Agents. Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research, 2, 478-483.

  43. 43. Sotiriou, G.A. and Pratsinis, S.E. (2010) Antibacterial Activity of Nanosilver Ions and Particles. Environmental Science and Technology, 44, 5649-5654.

  44. 44. Guggenbichler, J.P., Boswald, M., Lugauer, S. and Krall, T. (1999) A New Technology of Microdispersed Silver in Polyurethane Induces Antimicrobial Activity in Central Venous Catheters. Infection, 27, S16-S23.

  45. 45. Schierholz, J.M., Beuth, J., Pulverer, G. and Konig, D.P. (1999) Silver-Containing Polymers. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 43, 2819-2821.

  46. 46. Furno, F., Morley, K.S., Wong, B., Sharp, B.L., Arnold, P.L., Howdle, S.M., Bayston, R., Brown, P.D., Winship, P.D. and Reid, H.J. (2004) Silver Nanoparticles and Polymeric Medical Devices: A New Approach to Prevention of Infection? Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 54, 1019-1024.

  47. 47. Incoronato, A.L., Buonocore, G.G., Conte, A., Lavorgna, M., Nobile, M. and Del, M.A. (2010) Active Systems Based on Silver-Montmorillonite Nanoparticles Embedded into Bio- Based Polymer Matrices for Packaging Application. Journal of Food Protection, 73, 2256- 2262.

  48. 48. Bellantone, M., Williams, H.D. and Hench, L.L. (2002) Broad-Spectrum Bactericidal Activity of Ag2O-Doped Bioactive Glass. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 46, 1940- 1945.

  49. 49. Keleher, J., Jennifer, B., Heldt, N., Johnson, L. and Li, Y. (2002) Photo-Catalytic Preparation of Silver-Coated TiO2 Particles for Antibacterial Applications. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 18, 133-139.

  50. 50. Toshikazu, T. (1999) Antimicrobial Agent Composed of Silica-Gel with Silver Complex. Inorganic Materials, 6, 505-511.

  51. 51. Jeon, H.J., Yi, S.C. and Oh, S.G. (2003) Preparation and Antibacterial Effects of Ag-SiO2 Thin Films by Sol-Gel Method. Biomaterials, 24, 4921-4928.

  52. 52. Catauro, M., Raucci, M., De Gaetano, F. and Marotta, A. (2004) Antibacterial and Bioactive Silver-Containing Na2O·CaO2·SiO2 Glass Prepared by Sol-Gel Method. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, 15, 831-837.

  53. 53. Kawashita, M., Toda, S., Kim, H.M., Kokubo, T. and Matsuda, N. (2003) Preparation of Antibacterial Silver-Doped Silica Glass Microspheres. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 66A, 266-274.

  54. 54. Ozdemir, G., Limoncu, M.H. and Yapar, S. (2010) The Antibacterial Effect of Heavy Metal and Cetylpridinium-Exchanged Montmorillonites. Applied Clay Science, 48, 319-323.

  55. 55. Magana, S.M., Quintana, P., Aguilar, D.H., Toledo, J.A., Angeles-Chavez, C., Cortes, M.A., Leon, L., Freile-Pelerin, Y., Lopez, T. and Torres-Sanchez, R.M. (2008) Antibacterial Activity of Montmorillonites Modified with Silver. Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical, 281, 192-199.

  56. 56. Hagiwara, Z., Ishino, H., Nohara, S., Tagawa, K. and Yamanaka, K. (1990) Zeolite Particles Retaining Silver Ions Having Antibacterial Properties. US Patent No. 4911898.

  57. 57. Inoue, Y. and Kanzaki, Y. (1997) The Mechanism of Antibacterial Activity of Silver-Loaded Zeolite. Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry, 67, 377.

  58. 58. Kirov, G.N. and Terziiski, G. (1997) Natural Zeolites Sofia’95. In: Kirov, G., Filizova, L. and Petrov, O., Eds., PENSOFT Publishers, Sofia-Moscow, 133-141.

  59. 59. Galeano, B., Korff, E. and Nicholson, W.L. (2003) Inactivation of Vegetable Cells, but Not Spores, of Bacillus anthracis, B. cereus, and B. subtilis on Stainless Steel Surfaces Coated with an Antimicrobial Silver- and Zinc-Containing Zeolite Formulation. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 69, 4329-4331.

  60. 60. Matsumura, Y., Yoshikata, K., Kunisaki, S. and Truchido, T. (2003) Mode of Bactericidal Action of Silver Zeolite and Its Comparison with That of Silver Nitrate. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 69, 4278-4281.

  61. 61. Zhang, Y., Zhong, S., Zhang, M. and Lin, Y. (2009) Antibacterial Activity of Silver-Loaded Zeolite A Prepared by a Fast Microwave-Loading Method. Journal of Materials Science, 44, 457-462.

  62. 62. Kwakye-Awuah, B., Williams, C., Kenward, M.A. and Radecka, I. (2008) Antimicrobial Action and Efficiency of Silver-Loaded Zeolite X. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 104, 1516- 1524.

  63. 63. Lv, L., Luo, Y., Ng, W.J. and Zhao, X.S. (2009) Bactericidal Activity of Silver Nanoparticles Supported on Microporous Titanosilicate ETS-10. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 120, 304-309.

  64. 64. Rivera-Garza, M., Olguín, M.T., García-Sosa, I., Alcántara, D. and Rodríguez-Fuentes, G. (2000) Silver Supported on Natural Mexican Zeolite as an Antibacterial Material. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 39, 431-444.

  65. 65. Milan, Z., de Las Pozas, C., Cruz, M., Borja, R., Sanchez, E., Angonavan, K., Espinosa, Y. and Luna, B. (2001) The Removal of Bacteria by Modified Natural Zeolites. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A, 36, 1073-1087.

  66. 66. Concepción-Rosabal, B., Bogdanchikova, N., De la Rosa, I., Olguin, M.T., Alcantara, D. and Rodriguez-Fuentes, G. (2006) Properties and Utilization of Natural Zeolites. 7th International Conference on the Occurrence, New Mexico, 16-21 July 2006, 88-89.

  67. 67. Concepción-Rosabal, B., Rodríguez-Fuentes, G., Bogdanchikova, N., Bosch, P., Avalos, M. and Lara, V.H. (2005) Comparative Study of Natural and Synthetic Clinoptilolites Containing Silver in Different States. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 86, 249-255.

  68. 68. De la Rosa-Gómez, I., Olguín, M.T. and Alcántara, D. (2008) Antibacterial Behavior of Silver-Modified Clinoptilolite-Heulandite Rich Tuff on Coliform Microorganisms from Wastewater in a Column System. Journal of Environmental Management, 88, 853-863.

  69. 69. De la Rosa-Gomez, I., Olguin, M.T. and Alcántara, D. (2010) Silver-Modified Mexican Clinoptilolite-Rich Tuffs with Various Particle Sizes as Antimicrobial Agents against Escherichia coli. Journal of the Mexican Chemical Society, 54, 139-142.

  70. 70. Development of New Utilization of Materials (1994) Natural Zeolite and Its Utilization. No. 111 Committee, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Tokyo.

  71. 71. Ouki, S.K. and Kavannagh, M. (1999) Treatment of Metals-Contaminated Wastewaters by Use of Natural Zeolites. Water Science and Technology, 39, 115-122.

  72. 72. Doula, M. and Ioannou, A. (2003) The Effect of Electrolyte Anion on Cu Adsorption-Desorption by Clinoptilolite. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 58, 115-130.

  73. 73. Cabrera, C. and Gabaadon, C. (2005) Sorption Characteristics of Heavy Metal Ions by a Natural Zeolite. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, 80, 477-481.

  74. 74. Akgül, M., Karabakan, A., Acar, O. and Yürüm, Y. (2006) Removal of Silver (I) from Aqueous Solutions with Clinoptilolite. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 94, 99-104.

  75. 75. Lihareva, N., Dimova, L., Petrov, O. and Tzvetanova, Y. (2010) Ag+ Sorption on Natural and Na-Exchanged Clinoptilolite from Eastern Rhodopes, Bulgaria. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 130, 32-37.

  76. 76. Haris, P.O. and Ramelow, G.J. (1990) Binding of Metal Ions by Particulate Biomass Derived from Chlorella vulgaris and Scenedesmus quadricauda. Environmental Science and Technology, 24, 220-228.

  77. 77. Algarra, M., Jimenez, M.V., Rodriguez-Castellon, E., Jimenez-Lopez, A. and Jimenez- Jimenez, J. (2005) Heavy Metals Removal from Electroplating Wastewater by Aminopropyl-Si MCM-41. Chemosphere, 59, 779-786.

  78. 78. Hanzlík, J., Jehlicka, J., Sebek, O., Weishauptová, Z. and Machovic, V. (2004) Multi-Component Adsorption of Ag(I), Cd(II) and Cu(II) by Natural Carbonaceous Materials. Water Research, 38, 2178-2184.

  79. 79. Erdem, E., Karapinar, N. and Donat, R. (2004) The Removal of Heavy Metal Cations by Natural Zeolites. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 280, 309-314.

  80. 80. Zhanpeisov, N.U., Martra, G., Ju, W.S., Matsuoka, M., Coluccia, S. and Anpo, M. (2003) Interaction of N2O with Ag+ Ion-Exchanged Zeolites: An FT-IR Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical ab Initio and DFT Studies. Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical, 201, 237-246.

  81. 81. Bogdanchikova, N.E., Petranovskii, V.P., Machorro, R.M., Sugi, Y., Soto, G.V.M. and Fuentes, M.S. (1999) Stability of Silver Clusters in Mordenites with Different SiO2/Al2O3 Molar Ratio. Applied Surface Science, 150, 58-64.

  82. 82. Yi, Y., Wang, Y. and Liu, H. (2003) Preparation of New Crosslinked Chitosan with Crown Ether and Their Adsorption for Silver Ion for Antibacterial Activities. Carbohydrate Polymers, 53, 425-430.

  83. 83. Karabakan, A., Karabulut, S., Denizli, A. and Yürüm, Y. (2004) Removal of Silver(I) from Aqueous Solutions with Low-Rank Turkish Coals. Adsorption Science and Technology, 22, 135-144.

  84. 84. Tseng, R.L., Wu, F.C. and Juang, R.S. (2010) Characteristics and Applications of the Lagergren’s First-Order Equation for Adsorption Kinetics. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, 41, 661-669.

  85. 85. Ho, Y.S. and McKay, G. (1999) Comparative Sorption Kinetic Studies of Dye and Aromatic Compounds onto Fly Ash. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A, 34, 1179- 1204.

  86. 86. Aksu, Z. (2001) Equilibrium and Kinetic Modeling of Cadmium(II) Biosorption by C. vulgaris in Batch System: Effect of Temperature. Separation and Purification Technology, 21, 285-294.

  87. 87. Ho, Y.S. (1995) Adsorption of Heavy Metals from Waste Streams by Peat. University of Birmingham, Birmingham.

  88. 88. Ho, Y.S., Wase, D.A.J. and Forster, C.F. (1996) Kinetic Studies of Competitive Heavy Metal Adsorption by Sphagnum Moss Peat. Environmental Technology, 17, 71-77.

  89. 89. Ho, Y.S. and McKay, G. (1998) A Comparison of Chemisorption Kinetic Models Applied to Pollutant Removal on Various Sorbents. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 76, 332-340.

  90. 90. Ho, Y.S. and McKay, G. (1998) Sorption of Dye from Aqueous Solution by Peat. Chemical Engineering Journal, 70, 115-124.

  91. 91. Ho, Y.S. and McKay, G. (1999) Pseudo-Second Order Model for Sorption Processes. Process Biochemistry, 34, 451-465.

  92. 92. Ho, Y.S. and McKay, G. (2000) The Kinetics of Sorption of Divalent Metal Ions onto Sphagnum Moss Peat. Water Research, 34, 735-742.

  93. 93. Arica, M.Y., Kacar, Y. and Genc, O. (2001) Entrapment of White-Rot Fungus Trametes vesicolor in Ca-Alginate Beads: Preparation and Biosorption Kinetic Analysis for Cadmium Removal from an Aqueous Solution. Bioresource Technology, 80, 121-129.

  94. 94. Wu, F.C., Tseng, R.L. and Juang, R.S. (2001) Kinetic Modeling of Liquid-Phase Adsorption of Reactive Dyes and Metal Ions on Chitosan. Water Research, 35, 613-618.

  95. 95. Azizian, S. (2004) Kinetic Models of Sorption: A Theoretical Analysis. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 276, 47-52.

  96. 96. Ho, Y.S. (2004) Comment on “Kinetic Modeling and Equilibrium Studies during Cadmium Biosorption by Dead Sargassum sp. Biomass” by Cruz, C.C.V., da Costa, A.C.A., Henriques, C.A., Luna, A.S., Bioresource Technology, 91(3) (2004) 249-257. Bioresource Technology, 93, 321-323.

  97. 97. Ho, Y.S. (2004) Comments on “Arsenic Removal using Mesoporous Alumina Prepared via a Templating Method”. Environmental Science and Technology, 38, 3214-3215.

  98. 98. Ho, Y.S. (2004) Comments on “Removal of Copper from Aqueous Solution by Aminated and Protonated Mesoporous Aluminas: Kinetics and Equilibrium” by S. Rengaraj, Y. Kim, C.K. Joo, and J. Yi. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 276, 255-258.

  99. 99. Ho, Y.S. (2004) Comments on “Sorption of Basic Dyes from Aqueous Solution by Activated Sludge” [J. Hazard. Mater. 108 (2004) 183-188]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 114, 241-245.

  100. 100. Ho, Y.S. (2004) Comments on “Cadmium Removal from Aqueous Solutions by Chitin: Kinetic and Equilibrium Studies”. Water Research, 38, 2962-2964.

  101. 101. Ho, Y.S. (2004) Comments on “Collagen-Fiber-Immobilized Tannins and Their Adsorption of Au(III)”. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 43, 6265.

  102. 102. Justi, K.C., Laranjeira, M.C.M., Neves, A., Mangrich, A.S. and Fa’vere, V.T. (2004) Chitosan Functionalized with 2[-Bis-(pyridylmethyl)aminomethyl]4-methyl-6-formyl-phenol: Equilibrium and Kinetics of Copper(II) Adsorption. Polymer, 45, 6285-6290.