﻿ A Linear Regression Approach for Determining Option Pricing for Currency-Rate Diffusion Model with Dependent Stochastic Volatility, Stochastic Interest Rate, and Return Processes

Journal of Mathematical Finance
Vol.08 No.01(2018), Article ID:82776,17 pages
10.4236/jmf.2018.81013

A Linear Regression Approach for Determining Option Pricing for Currency-Rate Diffusion Model with Dependent Stochastic Volatility, Stochastic Interest Rate, and Return Processes

Raj Jagannathan

Department of Management Sciences, Tippie College of Business, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, USA    Received: August 14, 2017; Accepted: February 25, 2018; Published: February 28, 2018

ABSTRACT

A three-factor exchange-rate diffusion model that includes three stochastically-dependent Brownian motion processes, namely, the domestic interest rate process, volatility process and return process is considered. A linear regression approach that derives explicit expressions for the distribution function of log return of foreign exchange rate is derived. Subsequently, a closed form workable formula for the call option price that has an algebraic expression similar to a Black-Scholes model, which facilitates easier study, is discussed.

Keywords:

Option Pricing, Interest-Rate Parity Condition, Black-Scholes Model, Linear Regression Approach, Spot Option, Ito Calculus 1. Introduction

A foreign exchange rate depends on the supply and demand dynamics of a currency. The exchange rate is a function of trade balance, the interest rate differential and differential inflation expectations between the two countries   .

Let S(u), = exchange rate process over the time interval: , where u = number of domestic currency units, e.g., $, per unit of foreign currency =$-price of foreign currency.

As interest rate increases, $appreciates because investors prefer$-denominated bonds. Assuming a frictionless, arbitrage-free continuous-time economy in  , we define a diffusion process model for S(u). In addition, using interest-rate parity condition we have , see  .

In the following section, the formula for valuations of currency spot options is considered, where we obtain a closed form formula for the call option price that has a simple algebraic expression, which is similar to the call option price expression of a Black-Scholes model, making it much easier to compute its value and study. As in  , we can define an implied volatility function and derive its skewness property.

Subsequently, the proposed three-factor exchange-rate diffusion model is discussed, such that the stochastic volatility process and the stochastic domestic interest rate process each have a stochastically dependent Brownian motion return process.

In the next section, a linear regression approach that derives explicit expressions for the distribution function of is treated.

Foreign exchange rate option modeling is the subject of several well-known papers and in chapters within     . Leveraging Heston’s model  for this application would introduce complexity due to the need to numerically integrate conditional characteristic functions obtained as solutions of nonlinear pdf to derive the call option prices. An equivalent two-factor Black-Derman-Toy model  can be formulated with introduction of H(u).

The method suggested in this paper results in Black-Scholes type formula for call option pricing, which is easily computable.

Finally, we provide concluding remarks and suggestions for future direction.

2. Currency Spot Option

Given the spot rate , consider the present value of option (1)

where K is the known strike price and is a mean-reverting stochastic process given in (2) below. is the value of the exchange rate at the option’s maturity price. The option to purchase foreign currency over the counter can be exercised when S(s) > the strike price exchange rate K.

3. A Diffusion Process Model

A continuous-time risk-adjusted and risk-neutral exchange rate model, under a Martingale Measure Q, is defined below as a diffusion process (2), mean-reverting stochastic processes: Volatility (3) and domestic interest rate process (4), and foreign interest rate is a known constant. (2) (3) (4) (5)

Equation (5) is obtained from Equation (2) by the application of Ito calculus  .

Assumption: , where and and are independent Brownian processes.

, where

and and are independent Brownian processes. (6)

From the assumption above, the return processes are correlated with and that are standard Brownian motion processes.

Then it follows, see   , that the distributions of and are Gaussian processes.

Alternatively, and may be expressed as:

(7)

where is the long-term mean and where.

(8)

Remark 1:

From (8), choosing and that is small in value, we can make negligible.

If, alternatively, we assume that has a square root process  , then the random variable H(u) distribution is non-central. For simplicity we chose the mean-reverting process model (3).

where and

(9)

Assuming, and

(10)

The Brownian motion processes and are as follows:

, where (11)

In addition, the Brownian motion processes and under Q are independent.

Remark 2:

: the volatility process.

It follows from  that the distribution of is:

(12)

Alternatively, may be expressed as

(13)

where and.

See  for a similar assumption. See also  and  .

Note that has a normal distribution with mean 0 and variance s, so can be written as, where is a standard normal variable. Then can be written as a quadratic function of

plus a residual term. {See Proposition 1 below}.

For, we define a volatility process

.

Define, as the average standard

deviation in the case of uncorrelated Brownian motion process

[See  , p. 182].

Proposition 1:

(14)

where

(15)

Proof: See Appendix B.

We consider a mean-reverting Gaussian process model (2), the volatility stochastic processes and the processes, and in (3) to be correlated; where is a standard Brownian motion return process. In addition, in (3), we define the volatility as a mean reverting Gaussian process with as its long-term mean.

Assumption 1:

(16)

In (4), we define the domestic interest rate process as a mean reverting Gaussian process with as its long-term mean. The process is such that the return process is a correlated standard Brownian motion process to. The foreign interest rate is a constant

Assumption 2:

It follows from  that the distribution of:

(17)

Now we use the results obtained in Proposition 1 to derive an explicit expression for

Proposition 2:

(18)

Remark 3:

From the expression for

. the stochastic terms

modifies and the constant term modifies with the addition of and the constant terms modifies with the addition of.

Then, using the results in  , Proposition 1 and those in Appendix A and Appendix B we have:

(19)

Therefore,

Remark 4:

Note that in this paper is an updated version from the in  ,

due to our treatment of a stochastic interest rate:

In the case of.

, where (20)

(21)

where

(22)

is provided in (B1)

Case 1:;

Let

Let.

Assumption 3: and are independent random variables.

Assumption 4:.

Assumption 5: and.

If Assumptions (4) and (5) hold, then the conditional risk-neutral distribution of is:

Proposition 3:

(23)

where

(24)

If, then the roots of the equation defined in (24) are equal so that, then there exists a value such that

.

In other words, is the lowest value for the conditional random variable.

Remark 5:

Since we know the CDF of lnS(s) we can estimate the parameters of the underlying model (2)-(5).

Case 2: Conditional Risk-neutral Distribution function of,. Suppose, Conditional risk-neutral distribution of is as follows:

where

Example 1

:

:

Then

Remark 6:

From the expression for

the stochastic terms modify the term and the constant terms modifies with the addition of .

Proof:

Apply a proof similar to the one in Appendix A of  using the result for in Appendix B of the current paper. See also Proposition 4.

Remark 7:

Assume, which implies that.

If Assumption (3) holds then the conditional risk-neutral distribution of is:

(25)

where

(26)

If, then the roots of the equation defined in (26) are equal so that, then there exists a value such that.

In other words, is the lowest value of the conditional random variable.

Call option price:

Proposition 4:

where from Proposition 1

See Appendix B.

Remark 8:

Given the formula for

, the stochastic expression modifies the function and the constant terms, modifies with the addition of.

(27)

Let

(28)

Then

Hedge Ratio:

D-Neutral Portfolio

Delta-Neutral Portfolio

Consider the following portfolio that includes a short position of one European call and a long position of delta units of the domestic currency.

The portfolio of delta-neutral positions is defined as:

We obtain below Conditional Risk-neutral Distribution function of

(29)

by considering the cases of: h = 1, 0 and −1

We use a discrete approximation (see  , (28)).

Suppose, which implies.

Again, we consider the Equations (1)-(4) to define Example 1 below.

(30)

(31))

(32)

(33)

Let

Then,:

And:

If Assumption (2) holds then the unconditional risk-neutral distribution of and are independent random variables.

Then Figure 1 depicts the unconditional risk-neutral distribution of

.

Remark 9:

Future movement of values of risk-free interest rate and volatility are uncertain and as they increase, they affect call option values as depicted in the above Figure 2, Figure 3 (  , p. 204). Sudden changes in their values may occur because of economic shock. See the models suggested in   .

Figure 1. Unconditional risk-neutral CDF of lnS(s), strike price (cents) k from 1.1 to 16.2.

Figure 2. Unconditional call option price with strike price k (cents) from 1.1 to 26.

Figure 3. Unconditional hedge ratio with strike price k (cents) from 1.1 to 26.

4. Conclusion

We define a three-factor exchange-rate diffusion model with 1) stochastic volatility process, 2) stochastic domestic interest rate process, and 3) return process which are Brownian motion return processes that are stochastically dependent. Further generalization is possible with the assumption of domestic and foreign stochastic interest rate processes which are subject to economic shocks   . The results are applicable to bond option models (  , p. 783).

Cite this paper

Jagannathan, R. (2018) A Linear Regression Approach for Determining Option Pricing for Currency-Rate Diffusion Model with Dependent Stochastic Volatility, Stochastic Interest Rate, and Return Processes. Journal of Mathematical Finance, 8, 161-177. https://doi.org/10.4236/jmf.2018.81013

References

1. 1. Krugman, P.R. and Obstfeld, M. (2000) International Economics. 3rd Edition, Addison Wesley, Boston, 360-362.

2. 2. Jagannathan, R. (2016) A Linear Regression Approach to Two-Factor Option Pricing Model. Journal of Math Finance, 6, 317-337.

3. 3. Vasicek, O. (1977) An Equilibrium Characterization of the Term Structure. Journal Financial Economics, 5, 177-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(77)90016-2

4. 4. Heston, S. (1993) A Closed-Form Solution for Options with Stochastic Volatility with Applications to Bond and Currency Options. Review of Financial Studies, 6, 327-344. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/6.2.327

5. 5. Hull, J.C. (2009) Options, Futures and Derivatives. Pearson, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.

6. 6. Garman M.B. and Kohlhagen, S.W. (1983) Foreign Exchange Option Values. Journal of International Money and Finance, 2, 231-237. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5606(83)80001-1

7. 7. Oksendal, B. (2003) Stochastic Differential Equations—An Introduction with Applications. Springer, New York.

8. 8. Cox, J.C., Ingersoll, J.E. and Ross, S.A. (1985) A Theory of the Term Structure of Interest Rates. Econometrics, 53, 385-407. https://doi.org/10.2307/1911242

9. 9. Trolle, A.B. and Schwarz, E.S. (2009) A General Stochastic Volatility Model for the Pricing of the Interest Rate Derivatives. The Review of Financial Studies, 22, 2007-2057. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhn040

10. 10. Duffie, D. (1996) Dynamic Asset Pricing Theory. 2nd Edition, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

11. 11. Merton, R.C. (1976) Option Pricing When the Underlying Stock Returns Are Discontinuous. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 125-144.

12. 12. Jagannathan, R. (2008) A Class of Asset Pricing Models Governed by Subordinated Processes That Signal Economic Shocks. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 32, 3820-3846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2008.04.004

13. 13. Bakshi, G., Cao, C. and Chen, Z. (1997) Empirical Performance of Alternative Option Pricing Models. The Review of Financial Studies, 52, 2003-2049. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb02749.x

14. 14. Wilks, S.S. (1962) Mathematical Statistics. John Wiley, Hoboken.

Appendix A

is the regression coefficient.

(2A1)

Then the regression equation is

(2A2)

Assumption 6:

(Approximately) (2A3)

Note that and

.

Assumption 7:

(Approximately)

(2A4)

Proof of Proposition 1:

Appendix A from 

where

where

Appendix B

See  .

because

Let

where

Let

Let

where applying Wilk’s linear regression  , we get

(B1)