**Journal of Signal and Information Processing**

Vol.06 No.02(2015), Article ID:56748,14 pages

10.4236/jsip.2015.62016

Effect of Diversity and Filtering on the Performance of Wavelet Packets Base Multicarrier Multicode CDMA System

Maryam M. Akho-Zahieh, Nasser Abdellatif

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Applied Science Private University, Amman, Jordan

Email: maryamm@asu.edu.jo, nasser-abdellatif@asu.edu.jo, vice-presidentaa@asu.edu.jo

Copyright © 2015 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).

Received 13 April 2015; accepted 24 May 2015; published 28 May 2015

ABSTRACT

In Wavelet Packets Based Multicarrier Multicode CDMA system, the multicode (MCD) part ensures the transmission for high speed and flexible data rate, the multicarrier (MC) part ensures the flexibility of handling multiple data rates, and wavelet packets modulation technique contributes to the mitigation of the interference problems. The CDMA system can suppress a given amount of interference. In this paper, the receiver employs suppression filter (SF) to mitigate the effect of narrow-band jammer interference and diversity techniques to reduce multiple access interference. The framework for the system and the performance evaluation are presented in terms of bit error rate (BER) over a Nakagami fading channel. Also, we investigate how the performance is influenced by various parameters, such as the number of taps of the SF, the ratio of narrow-band interference bandwidth to the spread-spectrum bandwidth, the diversity order, the fading parameter and so on. Finally, the performance of the system is compared with the performance Sinusoidal (Sin) based MC/MCD CDMA system.

**Keywords:**

Wavelet Packets, Multicarrier, Multicode, Diversity, Suppression Filter

1. Introduction

The Wavelet Packet (WP) Multicarrier (MC) Multicode (MCD) Code-Division Multiple-Access (CDMA) systems in [1] and [2] uses WPs as subcarrier instead of sinusoidal one. Since WPs have much lower sidelobes with negligible sidelobe energy leakage compared with sinusoid carriers, it can mitigate the problem of inter-carrier interference (ICI) and multiple access interference (MAI). Also, WPs are naturally orthogonal and well localize in both time and frequency domain, which relaxes the requirement of frequency or time guard among different user signals.

It is well known that the inherent processing gain of CDMA system will, in many cases, provide the system with a sufficient degree of narrow-band interference rejection capability. However, if the interference signal is powerful enough, the conventional receiver is ineffective in mitigating this problem. Interference suppression filter (SF) can be employed to reject the narrow-band interference. A wiener-type filter, described in [3] , employs a tapped delay line structure to first predict and then subtract out the narrow-band interference. The technique of diversity combining can provide an attractive means for improving system performance by utilizing the signal components of different uncorrelated paths.

In this paper, the WP-MC/MCD-CDMA overlayed with a narrow-band interference binary phase shift keying (BPSK) waveform is analyzed. It is shown that the system performance is improved when the receiver consists of SF combined with diversity. The performance of the system is compared with the Sinusoidal (Sin) based multicarrier multicode CDMA system denoted as Sin-MC/MCD-CDMA.

2. System Model and Description

The transceiver block diagram for the system under consideration is shown in Figure 1. The transmitter consists of two parts, multicode part and wavelet packet part, while the receiver consists of a bandpass filter (BPF), tap suppression filter, correlators (multicode and wavelet packet) and the diversity combiner. At the transmitting

side for the user, the bit stream with bit duration is serial-to- parallel (S/P) converted into J parallel substreams. To reduce the inter-

substream interference (ISSI) resulting from the interference between the J substreams themselves, each sub-

stream with bit duration is coded by an orthogonal signal, where is the code length and is the chip duration. To maintain orthogonality of the coding signals, the maximum number of substreams J is limited to. The coded substreams are added and the resulting signal is again S/P converted into H superstreams,. The next step is the spreading of the H coded superstream by which is the pseudo-random noise (PN, processing gain) sequence of the user. The length of code and chip duration are and, respectively. Note that, and which are the bits with probabilities. The spreading superstreams will be used to modulate a wavelet packets, where is as given in [1] . The resultant superstreams are summed up and modulated by a sinusoidal

carrier, , before being transmitted. The wavelet packets with different h indices represent different subbands, thus the bandwidth of each subband can be arbitrarily chosen due to flexibility of the wavelet packets. Also, the whole signal spectrum is separated into H disjoint subbands. The partition of subbands are not limited by a minimum frequency distance but is determined by the channel characteristic. Furthermore, the energy of is unity. The transmitted signal for the of the user can be written as [1]

(1)

where with period T is the data symbol of user, substream of the superstream. The equivalent impulse response for the channel used in this paper can be written as,

where L is the number of propagation paths, , and are respectively, the path gain, the phase delay and the time delay of path of the user. The phase is assumed to be uniformly distributed over

Figure 1. Transceiver for WP-MC/MCD-CDMA employing diversity and filtering.

. The path gain model and distribution function depend on the nature of the channel and the propagation environment. We assume that the channel path gain is Nakagami distributed [4] . The output of the channel

for the user,.

The receiver shown in Figure 1 is assumed to be synchronous, designed to detect the first substream of the first user’s first wavelet packet propagating via the first path. The received signal, , is given by

(2)

where and are the inphase part and quadrature part of, respectively, and is the AWGN. The BPSK narrow-band interference jammer, is given by:

(3)

where is the jammer power, is the offset between the jammer carrier and the signal carrier and is the jammer phase. The information sequence has a bit rate where denotes the duration of one bit. The interference bandwidth is, we assume. An important quantity is the ratio of the

interference band to system bandwidth. The received signal is first passed through the BPF

having band width equal to the spread spectrum (SS) bandwidth =, which removes the out-of band noise and let the desired signal and inferences pass without distortion. The filtered signal is then passed through

a suppression filter which has an impulse response given by where and

(&) which are represent the number of taps of the filter on the left and right of the center tap [3] . For each tap, the output of the filter is given by:

(4)

where K is the total number of users, and is the filtered AWGN.

The output of the filter, , is demodulated by a local oscillator, despread by a user specific code sequence, multiplied by the wavelet packets and correlated over a period T to recover the super bit stream. The resulting data is then parallel-to-serial (P/S) converted again, despread by the code correlated over a period T, and then combined by diversity combiner. Finally, each combiner output for J substreams is P/S converted to recover. The output of the first correlator in the wavelet packet part denoted as can be written as

(5)

where is the desired signal, is the self interference, is the multipath interference, is the multicode interference, is the wavelet packets interference, is the multiuser interference,

is suppressed correlated AWGN and is the suppressed narrowband interference. The output signal of first converter for the first user's may be written as

(6)

The output for the first correlator in the multicode part is given by

(7)

After evaluation it can be shown that

(8)

and

(9)

where , ,

are the previous data bit and current data bit, respectively; with for inphase part, for quadrature part. is the discrete-time aperiodic cross-correlation function defined in [5] and is given by

The value of the four components, , and can be written as given in ( [1] , Chapter 4) as follows:

(10)

(11)

(12)

(13)

where

where, are the partial cross-correlation functions;, are the inphase part of previous data bit and current data bit, respectively;, are the quadrature component

of previous data bit and current data bit, respectively. Following the definition in [5] and [6] , the partial cross-correlation functions and, can be written as follows:

Also and are the partial cross-correlation functions defined in [5] as follows

The suppressed correlated AWGN component is given by

(14)

and the suppressed narrow-band interference is given by

(15)

3. Signal-to-Noise Plus Interference

To find the signal-to-noise plus interference ratio (SNIR), we need to find the desired signal power, interfer- ences, noise and jamming variances. From (8), the desired inphase signal power S is given by

(16)

To calculate the variances, it is assumed that all the interferences, noise and jamming terms are zero mean independent random variables (RV). The process of computing the variances for the different interference terms

is quite involved. Fortunately, the variances, , , and for a system without sup-

pression filter have been computed in [1, Chapter 4]. Without loss of generality, we invoke the result in [1] and [3] for the above variances with suppression filter, which is given by

where

(17)

with for QPSK and for BPSK, , Q represents the sum of amplitude levels of all multipath components, is the mean received symbol energy. Note that in the derivation of the

variances it is assumed that the variation in and is very small and can be ignored for all K users and L paths; and that the variances are independent of k, h and j. The variance for the inphase self interference is given by

(18)

(19)

Assuming that is a zero means RV uniformly distributed in

Also, it is evident that

And from [3]

According to this, (19) become

where for QPSK and BPSK.

From (15), the inphase component of the narrow jamming signal is given by

The variance can be evaluated as follows:

(20)

After certain evaluation it can be shown that

(21)

where is given in (19) [3] by

(22)

given that (ratio of the offset of interference carrier frequency to half SS bandwidth) and or zero for or, respectively. Accordingly, the total variance for noise and inter- ference is given by

(23)

where

and. Therefore, the output SNIR, , can be written as

(24)

4. Determination of Suppression Filter Coefficients

It is shown in [3] that the coefficients of the suppression filter can be determined using

(25)

is a lowpass autocorrelation function consists of three components

(26)

where is the lowpass version of the desired signal, is due to noise and is due to narrowband interference. The is given by

(27)

Since when or. Further more

then

(28)

The and are given in [3] by

(29)

(30)

where is defined as the integer part of x and. Therefore from (28), (29) and (30), one obtains

(31)

From (25) and (31), we can obtain the coefficients.

5. BER and Outage Probability Performance

A common method used to measure the performance for communication systems is, the average bit error rate,. It is obtained by averaging the instantaneous bit error rate (BER) of SNIR, over the channel fading functions.

In practical applications, in order to correctly detect a transmitted signal, the error probability of the received signal must not exceed a specified value. The output SNIR, must be above a certain specified threshold, say. This is quantified by the outage probability, which represents the probability of unsatisfactory reception of the signal over the intended coverage area. In this paper, we define the as the probability that falls

below ( [7] , p. 5), i.e..

and depend on the method of diversity combining employed, as shown below.

5.1. Selection Diversity

For selection diversity, the overall output SNIR of the receiver is given by

(32)

where is the SNIR at the branch given by (24). It is assumed that the channel does not change significantly over one symbol period and the selection is continuous. If the channel path gain is assumed to be

Nakagami distributed with parameter, then each input SNIR, , will be gamma distributed. In [1] , it was shown that the average BER, and are respectively given by

(33)

(34)

where is the gamma function, is the incomplete gamma function and is given by (24).

5.2. Equal Gain Combining

For equal gain combining (EGC), each branch contributes equally to the overall output SNIR [8] and the decision variable can be written as

(35)

In [1] , it was found that the average BER and are given respectively by

(36)

(37)

5.3. Maximal Ratio Combining

Maximal Ratio Combining (MRC) is an optimum diversity combining technique, in it the diversity branches are weighted accordingly and then combined with output given as

where is the weight function and is the sum of interferences, noise and jamming terms. In [1] , it was found that the average BER and are given respectively as

(38)

(39)

6. Results and Discussions

In this section, using the above analytical results, the BER performance and the of the system in the presence of narrow-band interference are presented. The effects of changing the system parameters such as the numbers of SF taps, q, p, D, m and the length of code are investigated. Finally, the BER performances of the system and Sin-MC/MCD-CDMA system are compared. Unless otherwise mentioned the parameters listed in Table 1 are used for the simulation in this section by means of the MATLAB program.

6.1. Effect of Diversity

Figure 2 shows the effect of diversity and filtering on BER performance. The types of diversity used are SD, EGC and MRC. From Figure 2, it can be noted that a tremendous improvement can be achieved by using diversity and filtering. As discussed previously, MRC is an optimum diversity combining because of that MRC technique shows the best performance. Selection diversity shows the worst performance, however, one benefit of SD is its simple implementation.

Figure 2. Effect of diversity and filtering on BER performance.

Table 1. MajorSystem Parameters Used in Simulation.

6.2. Effect of Number of Filter Taps

Figure 3 shows the BER performance as a function of without and with SF for double-sided (DS) taps filter (,) and singles-sided (SS) taps filter (,or,) using MRC and also with no diversity. As expected, the BER performance is improved by using SF and diversity. It can be noted that as the number of taps increases for SS or DS filters, the BER performance is improved. Also, an improvement can be achieved by using DS filter for the same number of the total taps as SS filter.

6.3. Effect of q and p

Figure 4 shows the BER performance with 3-taps DS filter as a function of q for two values of p using the three types of diversity. The system parameters are, , and. As expected the MRC has the best BER performance and the BER is improved by increasing p. The jamming variance depends on filter coefficients which are dependent on (is integer), because of that the worse value of BER is at, i.e. when (maximum).

Figure 3. Effect of number of filter taps on BER performance.

Figure 4. BER performance as function of p and q.

6.4. Effect of Diversity Order and Channel Fading

Figure 5 shows the effect of diversity order D and channel fading parameter m on BER. Three values of m are chosen, namely, , which approximate one sided Gaussian model, , which approximate the Rayleigh fading and, which approximated Ricean model. The performance is investigated for SS and DS 3-taps SFs. As expected, increasing D or m improves the performance of the system. From Figure 5, we can note that, for a given value of m and D, the DS filter outperforms the SS filter and the performance difference between DS and SS filters increases with the increasing of m which is evident at. Also, we note the BER performance of DS filter for is approximately the same for SS filter with.

6.5. Outage Performance

Figure 6 shows the outage performance of the system as a function of for two values of using MRC. The DS filter has three taps and is symmetric. As expected, the outage performance is degraded by increasing. As can be noted from Figure 6, the system is very tolerant of interference when SF is present. When, outages are approximately the same for systems with and without SF for the two values of. This is because the system is unable to give a satisfactory reception of the signal when.

6.6. Performance Comparison

Figure 7 shows the comparison of our system, WP-MC/MCD-CDMA, with Sin-MC/MCD-CDMA. The systems’ parameters are, and. The DS filter has three taps and is symmetric. As seen from Figure 7, the performance for the two systems without SF is almost the same. As expected, the BER performance can be improved by using SF and diversity, but the improvement in BER of our system is much more than that of the Sin-MC/MCD-CDMA system. This means, our system uses the SF and diversity to suppress the narrow-band interference and MAI, respectively, more efficiently than does the Sin-MC/MCD-CDMA system.

7. Conclusion

The BER and outage performance of a WP-MC/MCD system overlaying a narrow-band BPSK waveform and employing SF in the receiver has been evaluated. It is found that the performance is improved by using SF and diversity. The double-sided SF is superior to single-sided SF for the same number of total taps. The MRC has

Figure 5. Effect of diversity order D and fading parameter m.

Figure 6. Outage performance with and without SF.

Figure 7. BER performance for WP-MC/MCD-CDMA and Sin-MC/MCD-CDMA with and without SF.

better performance than SD and EGC. The performance of the system is improved by increasing the diversity order and the fading parameter. The performance of the system is improved when p increased. The system has the best BER when. Our system uses SF and diversity to suppress the narrow-band interference and MAI, respectively, more efficiently than does the Sin-MC/MCD-CDMA system.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Applied Science Private University, Amman, Jordan for financial support granted to cover publication fee of this research article.

References

- Akho-Zahieh, M.M. (2006) Design and Analysis of Multicarrier Multicode Wavelet Packets Based CDMA Communication Systems With Multiuser Detection. Ph.D. Dissertation, The University of Akron, Akron.
- Akho-Zahieh, M.M. and Ugweje, O.C. (2008) Diversity Performance of a Wavelet-Packet-Based Multicarrier Multicode CDMA Communication System. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 57, 787-797.
- Wang, J.Z. (1999) On the Use of Suppression Filter for CDMA Overlay. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 48, 405-414.
- Nakagami, N. (1960) The m-Distribution, a General Formula for Intensity Distribution of Rapid Fading. In: Hoffman, W.G., Ed., Statistical Methods in Radio Wave Propagation, Pergamon, Oxford, 3-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-009306-2.50005-4
- Pursley, M. (1977) Performance Evaluation for Phase-Coded Spread Spectrum Multiple-Access Communication-Part I: System Analysis. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 25, 795-799.
- Vandendorpe, L. (1995) Multitone Spread Spectrum Multiple Access Communications System in a Multipath Ricean Fading Channel. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 44, 327-337.
- Simon, M.K. and Alouini, M.S. (2005) Digital Communication over Fading Channel. 2nd Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken.
- Proakis, J.G. (1995) Digital Communications. 3rd Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York.