Open Journal of Nursing
Vol.07 No.02(2017), Article ID:74370,9 pages

Creation of a Training Course Program for Cancer-Patient Group Facilitators and Its Effects

Masami Chujo

Department of Adult and Elderly Nursing, School of Health Science, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Yonago, Japan

Copyright © 2017 by author and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY 4.0).

Received: December 13, 2016; Accepted: February 19, 2017; Published: February 22, 2017


Background: The purpose of this study was to clarify the effects of a facilitator training course focused on teaching beginners facilitator intervention skills. Intervention Method: One-and-a-half-day program combining education, role plays and relaxation. Methods: Participants were 11 participants, and of these 8 gave valid responses to our questionnaire. The scores of the participants on a facilitator intervention skills scale and on a scale of facilitator skills to cope with difficult situations were compared before and after the course, using SPSS16 for windows. In addition, the participants’ impressions before and after the course were analyzed qualitatively and inductively. Results: Seven of the 16 items on the facilitator intervention skills scale and 7 of the 12 items on the facilitator skills to cope with difficult situations improved the participants after the facilitator training. All participants indicated that they could understand the lectures. Their impressions changed from anxiety and enthusiasm to pleasure of learning and discovery of specific problems. Conclusion: The results suggested that the educational method created in this study, with emphasis on role-playing, is useful.


Facilitator, Group Therapy, Training, Cancer

1. Introduction

In recent years, increasing interest has been paid, both in Japan and overseas, to the psychosocial burden of cancer patients. Studies have been conducted to investigate the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions for reducing the psychological burden of cancer patients and improving their quality of life (QOL) [1] - [7] . Group therapy, which was developed in the West as one of the psychosocial interventions for improving the QOL of cancer patients [6] , is a program consisting of education on stress-coping methods and problem-solving methods, group discussions and progressive muscle relaxation (PMR). The program was modified for the Japanese [4] and its effects were investigated in Japan [1] [2] [6] .

Psychosocial group interventions for cancer patients will certainly be further disseminated in the future, but for this to happen, it is first necessary to create a therapeutic environment for providing group interventions. However, at pre- sent, there is a lack of human resources with the ability to act as facilitators (having the role of smoothly and effectively leading group discussions in group interventions). Facilitators provide interventions while facing difficulties in dealing with participants having problems, anxiety due to a lack of knowledge, and difficulty overcoming the fear of interventions, etc. [8] . Under these circumstances, the facilitator training course program in Japan consists of lectures and role-playing exercises. But the role-playing exercises in the program last for only about 3 and a half hours, and moreover, the program does not focus on facilitator intervention skills [8] . Although the level of understanding of lectures and level of anxiety have been reported [8] [9] , there have been no systematic reports on facilitators’ intervention methods. Therefore, it has been difficult to teach the details of facilitators’ intervention methods, and Morita et al. [8] reported that there were a small number of items that reduced anxiety.

Based on the above background, the purpose of this study was to clarify the effects of a facilitator training course focused on teaching beginners facilitator intervention skills.

This study is expected to serve as a foundation for finding the direction of facilitator education and for the dissemination of group interventions by clarifying the effects of the facilitator training course focused on facilitator intervention skills in group interventions for cancer patients.

2. Methods

2.1. Recruitment of the Study Participants

Posters and leaflets were distributed at the nursing departments in 29 hospitals near a university and within a university to recruit those who wished to participate in the study. In all, 11 persons applied for participation.

2.2. Creation of a Facilitator Training Program

Practice of the educational program of the I Can Cope Program [10] and group therapy for cancer patients: We participated in a workshop on activities in the US (lecture by Catherine Classen on October 11, 2003) [11] and a training course for cancer patient group facilitators in the “I Can Cope Program” in Hiroshima. A one-and-a-half-day program was then designed and implemented by reference to this workshop and training course, aimed at conferring on the participants the ability to facilitate a program known to be effective in patients with recurrent breast cancer on a medium-term basis.

Improvements in the program were made to incorporate easy-to-use skills. (Table 1) The explanation provided by the facilitators in the preliminary program was changed so that it could be clearly understood, and exercises of the relaxation method implemented by facilitators in the group therapy were also added, so that the participants would be able to use them immediately [11] [12] [13] . In addition, the number of role-playing sessions based on facilitators’ difficult-situation scenarios was increased to 5 (two role-playing and two discussion sessions for each scenario), so that an increase in group experience would allow the participants to understand the patients and the facilitators. Furthermore, when role-playing did not work well and remedial measures could not be found in discussions, the lecturers gave them hints for discussion or showed them an example of the facilitation method.

2.3. Evaluation Methods

The effects of the program were evaluated along the curriculum as follows.

1) Level of understanding of the lectures

The level of understanding was assessed for each item on a 4-point Likert scale.

2) Changes in attitudes as facilitators

1) Facilitator intervention skills

The scale that we created consisted of 12 items selected using a qualitative study method from the facilitator techniques used in group therapy for cancer patients. Each item was assessed on a 4-point Likert scale, with scores ranging from 0 to 3: e.g., “I have high anxiety” to “I have no anxiety”. A scale of facilita-

Table 1. Program.

tor skills to cope with difficult situations consisting of 12 items of difficult situations was also created by reference to representative difficult cases reported by Morita et al., and the level of anxiety was assessed on a 4-point Likert scale with scores ranging from 0 to 3:e.g., “I have high anxiety” to “I have no anxiety”.

2) Impressions of the group facilitator training course

The participants were encouraged to freely describe their impressions of role- playing exercises, what was good or bad, future problems, etc.

2.4. Ethical Considerations

This study was conducted with the approval of the Ethics Committee of the School of Heath Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University. Researchers explained the purpose of the study verbally and in writing to the participants.

2.5. Analysis Methods

1) Changes in attitudes as facilitators

Scores on each scale before and after the training course were statistically compared by the Wilcoxon test using SPSS16 for windows. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05.

2) Impressions

I read free descriptions on days 1 and 2 of the training course again and again, classified the descriptions into categories according to their meaning, gave them category names and counted the number of descriptions for each category.

3. Results

3.1. Characteristics of the Participants

Attributes of the participants

There were 11 participants, and of these, the responses of 8 were investigated. The remaining three participants were excluded because they failed to attend the entire one-and-a-half-day training course. Participants in their 20s (n = 3) and 30s (n = 3) were the most common. Nursing practice was the most common occupation (n = 4), followed by nursing students (n = 3). Two participants had previous experience of participating in support groups and 3 had experience of participating in patient groups, but none had previously attended a facilitator training course (Table 2).

3.2. Understanding of Lectures

All 8 participants answered that they understood all the lectures (purpose and effects of group therapy for cancer patients, significance of group experience for cancer patients, communication methods, roles and techniques of facilitators, relaxation method, and how to conduct group therapy) (Table 3).

3.3. Comparison before and after the Group Facilitator Training Course

1) Facilitation ability

Table 2. Subject bacground.

Table 3. Understanding of lectures.

Analysis of the participants’ facilitation ability before and after the training course revealed that the score on the facilitator intervention skills scale (total score) and that on the facilitator skills to cope with anxious situations (total score) significantly improved after the training (p < 0.05) (Table 4).

In addition, the individual scores for the following items concerning facilitator intervention skills improved significantly: “consider time and distribution of speaking time among individuals”, “express participants’ feelings in place of them”, “encourage participants to reflect on themselves”, “show oneself as standing face to face with participants”, “participants want to interact with other participants”, “participants play the role of facilitator in place of the facilitator”, and “the facilitator and sub-facilitator cooperate with each other”. Furthermore, the individual scores on the following question items concerning facilitators’ ability to cope with difficult situations also improved significantly: “when some participants do not speak at all”, “when silence lasts long”, “when some participants express dissatisfaction with how to proceed with the group”, “when participants often grumble and complain about medical staff”, “when participants develop recurrence or metastasis (disease progression)”, and “when there is a

Table 4. The participants’ facilitation ability before and after the training course.

*p < 0.05.

conflict or difference of opinions among participants”.

2) Changes in free descriptions

Based on analysis of the free descriptions, the participants’ descriptions on day 1 were categorized as follows: “anxiety about facilitator communication”, “acquisition of role-play learning skills”, “understanding of the advantages of role- play learning”, “learning from the lecturer’s demonstration of facilitation,” and “others”. The participants’ descriptions on day 2 were categorized as follows: “repeated role-playing increases learning”, “discovery of specific facilitator strategies”, “discovery of problems towards the implementation of facilitation”, “use in clinical nursing, etc.”, and “others” (Table 5).

4. Discussion

4.1. Small Number of Participants

The schedule and other information about this course were disseminated to 29 hospitals, inviting attendance, but the actual number of attendees was only 11. This is probably attributable to the long duration of the course (lecture for one and a half days) and the different design of the course (role-playing on many scenes). Of the 11 participants, 3 were able to attend the course only on one of the two days. Therefore, the number of the study subject was only 8. A high percentage of the participants were unwilling to participate in the role-playing, and it would appear that people tend to avoid participating in training courses that involve much role-playing.

Table 5. Changes in the free descriptions.

4.2. Extent of Understanding of the Lectures

There have been many reports on the need for lectures on the objectives and significance of group therapy, and the contents of the lectures in this study also covered these items. In the past, explanation about intervention focused on cases where intervention was difficult [9] [10] . The present study was unique in that more concrete explanations about the skills of intervention were included in the lectures. When the participants were asked to provide their assessment of the quality of the lectures, all of them answered that they had understood all the topics covered by the lectures, including the lecture on our new attempts. This result is consistent with the results of previously reported studies 8, 9. In regard to the particularly favorable responses in regard to the clarity of the lectures in this study, we could say that this might be attributable to: 1) the small number of participants, which encouraged the participants to ask questions; and 2) the delivery of the lectures while the responses of individual participants were monitored.

4.3. Effects on Improvement of the Facilitator Capabilities

Significant improvement was seen not only in the total score on anxiety when facing difficult scenes by facilitators, but also in the scores on various other items of the scales used. This outcome was similar to that reported by Morita [8] . This probably indicates that role-playing under the scenario of difficult scenes allowed the participants to devise strategies to deal with the difficulties that they faced. In the present study, questions were also asked about the facilitator’s intervention skills, and significant improvement of the facilitators’ skills was noted after the training course. This finding suggests that prior concrete explanation about the skills of facilitators enabled the participants to actively utilize such skills during role-playing, resulting in improvement of their skills.

4.4. Benefits of Practicing Role-Playing Multiple Times

To the free-answer question asked on the first day, many participants described “anxiety about facilitator communication”. Although the participants initially have expressed difficulty in role-playing, repeated role-playing has the advantage of allowing the participants to learn, through comparison, the availability of various ways of dealing with difficulties and the presence of various rationales on the bases of which to choose the appropriate method of handling [14] , and it also allows the participants to accumulate experience in dealing with practical scenes. Furthermore, participants can deepen their engagement in role-playing and learning as the frequency of role-playing increases. At the same time, participants can also learn various ways of dealing with difficulties through holding discussions with other participants on the basis of their experience with role- playing. There was a participant who compared what she learned from role- playing with her own past experience of nursing, and found common features between them, pointing out the possibility of “utilization in clinical nursing, etc.” This participant seems to have reached the stage where the knowledge/skill learned from this kind of training course could also be utilized during her practical nursing duties.

Cite this paper

Chujo, M. (2017) Creation of a Training Course Program for Cancer-Patient Group Facilitators and Its Effects. Open Journal of Nursing, 7, 268- 276.


  1. 1. Fukui, S., Kugaya, A., Okamura, H., et al. (2000) A Psychosocial Group Intervention for Japanese Women with Primary Breast Carcinoma: A Randomized Controlled trial. American Cancer Society, 31, 1026-1036.

  2. 2. Classen, C., Butler, L.D., Miller, E., et al. (2001) Supportive-Expressive Group Therapy and Distress in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Intervention Trial. Archives of General Psychiatry, 58, 494-501.

  3. 3. Goodwin, P.J., Leszcz, M., Ennis, M., et al. (2001) The Effect of Group Psychosocial Support on Survival in Metastatic Breast Cancer. The New England Journal of Medicine, 345, 1719-1726.

  4. 4. Fawzy, F.I., Fawzy, N.W. and Elashoff, R. (1990) A Structured Psychiatric Intervention for Cancer Patients I Change over Time in Methods of Coping and Affective Disturbance. Archives of General Psychiatry, 47, 720-725.

  5. 5. Chujo, M., Mikami, I., Takashima, N., et al. (2005) A Feasibility Study of Psychosocial Group Intervention for Breast Cancer Patients with First Recurrence. Support Care Cancer, 13, 503-514.

  6. 6. Spiegel, D., Boom, J.R. and Yalom, I. (1981) Group Support for Patients with Metastatic Cancer. Archives of General Psychiatry, 38, 527-533.

  7. 7. Hosaka, T., Sugiyama, Y., Hirai, K., et al. (2000) Persistent Effects of a Structured Psychiatric Intervention on Breast Cancer Patients’ Emotions. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 54, 559-563.

  8. 8. Morita, M., Yoshida, M., Asakura, T., Okuhara, H., Fukui, S. and Endou, K. (2006) Gan kanjanotamenosapo-to guru-pufasirite-ta-kyouikupuroguramu no jissi tohyouka. Palliative Care Research, 1, 114-120. (In Japanese)

  9. 9. Hosaka, T. (2008) Gannkannja ya kazokuga hituyoutosuru shakaiteki support ya group counseling no yuyousei nikansuru kenkyu. Japanese, 14-43.

  10. 10. Kiba, S. and Maruguchi, M. (2005) Gan kanja to kazoku no sapoto puroguramu [Support Program for Cancer Patients and Family: Basics and Practice]. Seikaisha, Tokyo, 71-72.

  11. 11. Classen, C., Diamond, S., Soleman, A., Fobair, P., Apora, J. and Spiegel, D. (1983) Brief Supportive-Expressive Group Therapy for Women with Primary Breast Cancer: A treatment Manual.

  12. 12. Chujo, M. and Okamura, H. (2015) The Skills of Facilitator Nurses in Psycho-Social Group Intervention for Cancer Patients. Yonago Acta Medica, 58, 69-75.

  13. 13. Chujo, M. and Okamura, H. (2015) Partnership in Psycho-Social Group Intervention for Cancer Pationts; Factors to Creating Group Dynamics. Yonago Acta Medica, 58, 45-50.

  14. 14. Kawano, M. (1997) Kannja kanngoshi kannkei to roleplaying Nihonkanngokyoukaishuppannkai, Japanese, 72-73.