s_fig_con">Figure 10 for non-working test pile #1, the ratio of settlement ΔS (settlement between the point of intersection of two straight lines and that corresponding to final test load) to S (total settlement) is taken to be the reduction factor (RF) for that set of test data . However, reduction factor (RF) is given by the following:
RF = Reduction factor.
Qmod = Modified Chin’s value of ultimate capacity.
Qch = Chin’s value of ultimate capacity.
5.5. Decourt’s Extrapolation (1999)
Applying Decourt’s Extrapolation by dividing each load by its corresponding settlement and ploting the resulting values against the applied load. A linear regression over the apparent line (last three points) determines a line. Decourt identified the ultimate load as the intersection of this line with load axis as shown in Figures 11 for working test pile #3 .
6. Proposed Method for Determination of Ultimate Pile Capacity from Load Test
The load vs settlement behavior of the pile is extrapolated using an empirical method. The estimation of ultimate load consists of two steps as given below:
1) Plotting load settlement curve from field load test data as shown in Figures 12-14.
2) The ultimate pile capacity is given by the empirical formula:
Qu = ultimate load capacity (kN).
m = slope of the trend straight line.
y = y-intercept of the straight line (as a value without sign).
7. Comparison between Different Methods for Determination of Ultimate Pile Capacity
The calculation of the ultimate capacity of piles and the corresponding factors of safety using the above mention methods are summarized in Table 5.
The ultimate loads obtained by various methods from the pile load test results are shown in Figure 15.
8. Load Carried by End Bearing and Friction along Shaft
From Table 6 the values of the ultimate pile capacity were taken to evaluate the percentage of friction and end bearing capacity from Figure 3. Based on the above findings, it was found that the percentage of load carried by friction along the pile shaft and the end bearing are shown in the following Table 6.
Figure 10. Ultimate pile capacity by Ahmad and Pise method for non-working test pile #1.
Figure 11. Ultimate pile capacities by Decourt’s extrapolation method for working test pile #3.
Figure 12. Ultimate pile capacity using proposed method for non-working test pile #1.
From the testing program and comparable study conducted, the following conclusions are arrived at:
1) The percentage of friction load carried by the shaft is approximately 85% to 90% and the percentage of load carried by the end bearing is 15% to 10%.
2) Hansen (1963) method gives higher values of ultimate capacity carried by the pile than the other methods.
3) A new proposed method to calculate the ultimate capacity of pile from pile load test is presented.
4) The proposed method for determining the ultimate capacity of friction piles appears to give results that are in good agreement with the analytical predictions.
5) The proposed method is good to apply, easier, quicker, more reliable, does not give max or min numbers as compared to some others.
Figure 13. Ultimate pile capacity piles using proposed method for working test pile pile #2.
Figure 14. Ultimate pile capacity pile using proposed method for working test pile #3.
Table 5. Ultimate capacity and factor of safety (F.S.) of pile using different methods.
Figure 15. Comparison of ultimate pile loads using different methods.
Table 6. Percentage of ultimate load carried by end bearing and friction.
The author would like to acknowledge the Fetih Construction Company and Pauer-Egypt Company for their valuable assistance.