Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics
Vol.04 No.01(2016), Article ID:63062,10 pages
10.4236/jamp.2016.41016
Calculation of the Approximate Energy of Ground and Excited Stationary States in Quantum Mechanics Using Delta Method
Farrin Payandeh, Touraj Mohammadpour
Department of Physics, Payame Noor University (PNU), Tehran, Iran

Copyright © 2016 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/



Received 10 December 2015; accepted 24 January 2016; published 27 January 2016
ABSTRACT
In this paper, pursuing a new advised method called Delta method which is basically similar to variational method, we find the ground and excited states, according to a typical quantum Hamiltonian. Moreover, applying this method, the upper bound values for the eigenenergies of the so- called ground and excited states are estimated. We will show that this new method, is as beneficial as the traditional variational method which is common in deriving eigenenergies of some of the quantum Hamiltonians. This method helps physics students to broaden their knowledge about the possible mathematical ways; they can use to obtain eigenenergies of some quantum Hamiltonians. The advantage of Delta method to variational method is in its simplicity and reduction of the calculation procedures.
Keywords:
Quantum Mechanics, Eigenenergies, Alternative Methods, Delta Method

1. Introduction
Most problems encountered in quantum mechanics cannot be solved exactly. Exact solutions of the Schrodinger equation exist only for a few idealized systems. So, in order to solve general problems, one must resort to approximation methods. Up to now, a variety of such methods have been developed, and each has its own area of applicability. There are many methods for solving Schrodinger equation, i.e. perturbation theory [1] , the variational method [1] , and the WKB method [1] , Supersymmetry quantum mechanics [2] - [6] , Nikivorov-Uvarov method [7] - [9] , Romanovski polynomials in quantum mechanics [10] - [12] , etc. [12] - [23] .
Three conventional approximation methods for studying the stationary states corresponding to time-indepen- dent Hamiltonians, are: perturbation theory, the variational method, and the WKB method. Perturbation theory is based on the assumption that the problem we wish to solve is, in some sense, only slightly different from a problem that can be solved exactly. In the case where the deviation between the two problems is small, perturbation theory is suitable for calculating the contribution associated with this deviation; this contribution is then added as a correction to the energy and the wave function of the exactly solvable Hamiltonians. So perturbation theory builds on the known exact solutions to obtain approximate solutions.
But, about those systems whose Hamiltonians cannot be reduced to an exactly solvable part plus a small correction, the variational method or the WKB approximation are considered. The variational method is particularly useful in estimating the energy eigenvalues of the ground state and the first few excited states of a system for which one has only a qualitative idea about the form of the wave function. The WKB method is useful for finding the energy eigenvalues and wave functions of systems for which the classical limit is valid. Unlike perturbation theory, the variational and WKB methods do not require the existence of a closely related Hamiltonian that can be solved exactly [1] .
The application of the approximation methods to the study of stationary states consists of finding the energy eigenvalues
and the eigenfunctions
of a time-independent Hamiltonian
that does not have exact solutions:

Depending on the structure of
, we can use any of the three methods mentioned above to find the approximate solutions to this eigenvalue problem.
In this paper, we will use a new approximation method called Delta method for finding the ground and excited energy state of stationary states. This method, with a difference in the way of calculation, is somehow similar to the variational method at the beginning. Like the variational method, we first find the time-independent Hamiltonian
that does not have exact solution, using a supposed trial function and calculating the value of energy
in terms of a parameter
. Then, we will estimate the upper bound values for the eigenenergies of ground and excited states applying the Delta conditions
and
on the second and third order equations, respectively. The difference between Delta and variational methods is that in variational method the derivative of E to
is calculated and the solution for
is obtained with affecting the conditions on E. But, in Delta method, we obtain the physical solutions with writing
in terms of E in the form of a two or three order equation and applying the mathematical Delta conditions. Moreover, in variational method, after calculating the derivative of E to
and equating it with zero to find the
which minimizes

It should be noted that Delta method could be applied to all of the problems to be solved through variational method and exactly give the same result. However, the advantage of Delta method is first in its simplicity, and then in reduction of the calculation procedures.
In Section 2, we will have a review on the variational method [1] . In Section 3, we will explain Delta method and in Section 4, we will show the applicability and simplicity of Delta method with some examples.
2. Variational Method
There exist systems whose Hamiltonians are known, but they cannot be solved exactly or by a perturbative treatment. That is, there is no closely related Hamiltonian that can be solved exactly or approximately by perturbation theory because the first order is not sufficiently accurate. One of the approximation methods that are suitable for solving such problems is the variational method, which is also called the Rayleigh-Ritz method. This method does not require knowledge of simpler Hamiltonians that can be solved exactly. The variational method is useful for determining upper bound values for the eigenenergies of a system whose Hamiltonian is known whereas its eigenvalues and eigenstates are not known. It is particularly useful for determining the ground state. It becomes quite cumbersome to determine the energy levels of the excited states.
In the context of the variational method, one does not attempt to solve the eigenvalue problem:

But rather one uses a variational scheme to find the approximate eigenenergies and eigenfunctions from the variational equation:

where 


If 






the true energy of the system. The variational method is particularly useful for determining the ground state energy and its eigenstate without explicitly solving the Schrodinger equation. Not that for any (arbitrary) trial function 


The equality condition occurs only when 




with

and since 

which proves (4).
To calculate the ground state energy, we need to carry out the following four steps:
・ First, based on physical intuition, make an educated guess of a trial function that takes into account all the physical properties of the ground state (symmetries, number of nodes, smoothness, behavior at infinity, etc.). For
the properties we are not sure about, they can be included in the trial function adjustable parameters 

・ Second, using (3), calculate the energy; this yields an expression which depends on the parameters 

In most cases 
・ Third, using (8) search for the minimum of 





with


・ Fourth, substitute these values of 




About the energies of the excited states, it should be said that the variational method can also be used to find the approximate values for the energies of the first few exited states. For instance, to find the energy and eigenstate of the first excited state that will approximate 




Then proceed as we did in the case of the ground state. That is, solve the variational Equation (2) for

Similarly, to evaluate the second excited state, we solve (2) for 

These conditions can be included in the variational problem by means of Lagrange multipliers, that is, by means of a constrained variational principle.
In this way, we can in principle evaluate any other excited state. However, the variational procedure becomes increasingly complicated as we deal with higher excited states. As a result, the method is mainly used to determine the ground state.
3. Delta Method
In this section, we obtain the expectation value of energy in a supposed state













where 



Then, using this inequality, just like the variational method, an upper limit for energy is obtained that leads to finding the approximate value of ground or excited state energy.
In some of the problems, the expectation value of energy in terms of 







Now, according the sign of


Then, three distinct real solutions are obtained for 


then, one real solution and two complex solutions are obtained [24] . Of course, since in physical problems 





In the next section, we will consider a few examples of quantum mechanics and estimate their upper limit of the ground or excited state energies, using Delta method. We remark that this method can be applied as another approach to approximate solutions for all the problems of quantum mechanics to be solved through the variational method. In the case of selecting a suitable trial function, Delta method can be applied to a complex problem such as Poschl-Teller, Rosen-Morse, or another shape invariant potential in quantum mechanics, too. However, the main point is that proposing and guessing the suitable trial function which is based on physical intuition, is very important. For example, it can be shown that with some proposal trial wave functions and applying some simplification, exactly the same result could be achieved for Poschl-Teller and Rosen-Morse potentials through both variational and Delta methods. Of course, it should be noted that up to now, a variety of approximation methods have been developed, and each has its own area of applicability. However, the main purpose of introducing Delta method is to show that this new method, is as beneficial as the traditional variational method which is common in deriving eigenenergies of some of the quantum Hamiltonians, and to help physics students to broaden their knowledge about the possible mathematical ways to obtain eigenenergies of some quantum Hamiltonians with a simpler method than the conventional variational method.
4. Examples
In this section, using Delta method, we estimate the upper limit of the ground or excited state energies for a few examples of quantum mechanics that are obtained from the variational method, before.
Exp. 1
Calculating the ground and excited state energies of a one-dimensional harmonic oscillator using Delta method.
Choosing the trial function for ground state in the form of 

Neglecting the calculations, we get:
In Delta method there is no need for obtaining the derivative of 


Using the Delta method, the solutions for 
As it can be seen, 


Again, forming the second order equation of 

and then,
which is the same value obtained from the variational method.
Exp. 2
Estimating the ground state energy of the Hydrogen atom using Delta method.
Choosing the trial function in the form of

Now, using Delta method we have:
that is the same estimated value for the ground state energy of the Hydrogen atom obtained from the variational method.
We should note that if we find 

we find that one of the solutions for 
Exp. 3
Estimation of the ground state energy of a one-dimensional harmonic oscillator by making use of Delta method with the following two trial functions:
(a)
(b)
where 
(a) We have:
The final solution is:
or

which is the ground state energy of a one-dimensional harmonic oscillator with the above defined trial function and is the same result obtained from the variational method.
(b) We have:
therefore
Again, it is quite in accordance with the resulted solution of variational method.
Exp. 4
Applying Delta method, we calculate the ground state energy for a particle of mass m which is bouncing vertically and elastically on a reflecting hard floor where 
Choosing the trial function



In the above third order equation of 

The third order equation has some defined solutions due to 



which is consistent with the solution obtained from variational method, i.e.

Exp. 5
Estimation of the ground state energy and the corresponding wave function of a system consisting of two identical particles of spin 

Choosing the trial function in the form of
Applying Delta method, we get:
which with
we will encounter the following condition:

that is the same energy of the ground state obtained from the variational method.
5. Conclusion
In this paper, we used an alternative method of finding the ground and excited energies state of stationary states. Basically, it is the same as the variational method, where a time-independent Hamiltonian 




Cite this paper
FarrinPayandeh,TourajMohammadpour, (2016) Calculation of the Approximate Energy of Ground and Excited Stationary States in Quantum Mechanics Using Delta Method. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics,04,130-139. doi: 10.4236/jamp.2016.41016
References
- 1. Zettili, N. (2009) Quantum Mechanics and Applications. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken.
- 2. Domínguez-Hernández, S. and Fernández C, D.J. (2011) Rosen-Morse Potential and Its Supersymmetric Partners. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 50, 1993-2001.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10773-010-0522-z - 3. Díaz, J.I., Negro, J., Nieto, L.M. and Rosas-Ortiz, O. (1999) The Supersymmetric Modified Pöschl-Teller and Delta-Well Potentials. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 32, 8447-8460.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/32/48/308 - 4. Negro, J., Nieto, L.M. and Rosas-Ortiz, O. (2000) Confluent Hypergeometric Equations and Related Solvable Potentials in Quantum Mechanics. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 41, 7964-7996.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1323501 - 5. Contreras-Astorga, A. and Fernández C, D.J. (2008) Supersymmetric Partners of the Trigonometric Pöschl-Teller Potentials. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 41, Article ID: 475303.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/41/47/475303 - 6. Compean, C.B. and Kirchbach, M. (2006) The Trigonometric Rosen-Morse Potential in Supersymmetric Quantum Mechanics and Its Exact Solutions. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 39, 547-557.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/39/3/007 - 7. Karayer, H., Demirhan, D. and Büyükkilic, F. (2015) Extension of Nikivorov-Uvarov Method for the Solution of Heun Equation. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 56, 1-22.
- 8. Yasuk, F., Berkdemir, C. and Berkdemir, A. (2005) Exact Solutions of the Schrodinger Equation with Non-Central Potential by Nikiforov-Uvarov Method. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 38, Article No. 29.
- 9. Gönül, B. and Köksal, K. (2007) A Search on the Nikiforov-Uvarov Formalism. Physica Scripta, 75, 686-690.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-8949/75/5/017 - 10. Quesne, C. (2013) Extending Romanowski Polynomials in Quantum Mechanics. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 54, Article ID: 122103.
- 11. Weber, H.J. (2007) Connection between Real Polynomial Solutions of Hypergeometric-Type Differential Equations with Rodrigues Formula. Central European Journal of Mathematics, 5, 415-427.
- 12. Weber, H.J. (2007) Connection between Romanowski and Other Polynomials. Central European Journal of Mathematics, 5, 581-595.
- 13. Quesne, C. (2008) Exceptional Orthogonal Polynomials, Exactly Solvable Potentials and Supersymmetry. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 41, Article ID: 392001.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/41/39/392001 - 14. Quesne, C. (2009) Solvable Rational Potentials and Exceptional Orthogonal Polynomials in Supersymmetric Quantum Mechanics. SIGMA, 5, 1-24.
- 15. Quesne, C. (2011) Higher Order SUSY, Exactly Solvable Potentials, and Exceptional Orthogonal Polynomials. Modern Physics Letters A, 26, 1843-1852.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0217732311036383 - 16. Quesne, C. (2011) Rationally-Extended Radial Oscillators and Laguerre Exceptional Orthogonal Polynomials in kth-Order SUSYQM. International Journal of Modern Physics A, 26, 5337-5347.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0217751X11054942 - 17. Quesne, C. (2012) Revisiting (Quasi-)Exactly Solvable Rational Extensions of the Morse Potential. International Journal of Modern Physics A, 27, Article ID: 1250073.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0217751X1250073X - 18. Quesne, C. (2012) Novel Enlarged Shape Invariance Property and Exactly Solvable Rational Extensions of the Rosen-Morse II and Eckart Potentials. SIGMA, 8, 1-19.
- 19. Odake, S. and Sasaki, R. (2009) Infinitely Many Shape Invariant Potentials and the New Orthogonal Polynomials. Physics Letters B, 679, 414-417.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2009.08.004 - 20. Odake, S. and Sasaki, R. (2013) Extensions of Solvable Potentials with Finitely Many Discrete Eigenstates. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 46, Article ID: 235205.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/46/23/235205 - 21. Odake, S. and Sasaki, R. (2011) Exactly Solvable Quantum Mechanics and Infinite Families of Multi-Indexed Orthogonal Polynomials. Physics Letters B, 702, 164-170.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2011.06.075 - 22. Grandati, Y. (2011) Solvable Rational Extensions of the Morse and Kepler-Coulomb Potentials. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 52, Article ID: 103505.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3651222 - 23. Ho, C.-L. (2011) Prepotential Approach to Solvable Rational Potentials and Exceptional Orthogonal Polynomials. Progress of Theoretical Physics, 126, 185-201.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1143/PTP.126.185 - 24. Woan, G. (2000) The Cambridge Handbook of Physics Formulas. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.








































