Received 22 April 2015; accepted 21 August 2015; published 24 August 2015

ABSTRACT

Promestriene (3-propyl ethyl, 17B-methyl estradiol) is a synthetic estrogen analogue with reported minimal systemic absorption which has been suggested for topical treatment of vaginal atrophy. Promestriene’s ability to stimulate proliferation and estrogen responsive gene expression was analyzed in estrogen receptor (ER+) positive breast cancer cell lines MCF-7, T-47D, and BT-474 using CFSE flow cytometric analysis, and quantitative RT-PCR analysis of GREB1 RNA expression, an estrogen responsive gene involved in estrogen receptor alpha expression. In estrogen replete conditions, Promestriene did not stimulate proliferation even at high concentrations (100,000 pg/ml). However, anti-estradiol depletion allowed low dose Promestriene (2 - 10 pg/ml) to stimulate GREB1 expression in all three cell lines at levels equal to that induced by estradiol (BT-474) or significantly higher than estradiol (MCF7 and T-47D). These findings suggest that Promestriene has the potential to support estrogen like cell signaling, a possible contraindication for use in treatment of vaginal atrophy associated with breast cancer aromatase inhibitor therapy.

Keywords:

Breast Cancer, Survivor, Estrogen Receptor Positive, Hormone Therapy, Side Effects, Promestriene

1. Introduction

The National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health 2015 report estimates life time risk for breast cancer for women in the United States at 12.3% [1] . The majority of breast cancer cases (70% - 80%) in the United States are reported as being hormone receptor positive (HR+), meaning that they express estrogen receptors (ER) or progesterone receptors (PR) or both [1] . ER+ breast tumors have the potential for their growth to be enhanced by estrogen. Early in breast cancer oncology, the discovery of breast cancer growth stimulation through ovarian hormones indicated the expression of estrogen receptors (ER) by tumor cells as a target for directed anti-hormone therapies. Direct antagonists of the ER and indirect depletion of circulating sources of estrogen (oophorectomy and anti-aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapies) became strong therapies for controlling ER mediated tumor growth [2] . Numerous selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) therapies have been proposed and tested for use in blocking ER function in pre-menopausal women as single therapies or in combination with tamoxifen with mixed success [1] - [5] . In post-menopausal and oophorectomized women blockade of adipose production of estrogen from androgens is most often accomplished using long term adjuvant HT therapies [6] - [8] . A problem arising from chronic exposure to anti-hormone therapies is side effects of estrogen deprivation including symptoms similar to those seen in menopausal women such as thinning and shrinking of vaginal and breast tissues, vaginal dryness, soreness, painful intercourse and urinary incontinence [6] -[8] . Topical application of Promestriene has been suggested as a possible treatment for reducing such symptoms.

Promestriene (3-propyl ethyl, 17B-methyl estradiol) is a synthetic estrogen analog that has been reported to significantly improve the symptoms of vaginal atrophy caused by estrogen deprivation in topical application [6] [7] . Promestriene has been studied and used in Europe, Asia, and South America to treat symptoms such as thinning and shrinking of tissue, vaginal dryness, soreness, painful intercourse and urinary incontinence [6] -[8] . Though topical application of Promestriene shows some absorption at the very beginning of treatment when the vaginal mucosa is thin, this minimal uptake is not observed after vaginal lining conditioning with chronic treatment [8] . Promestriene trials in Europe and India have demonstrated significant improvement in the symptoms of vaginal atrophy symptoms with little change in serum estradiol, FSH or LH levels [6] [7] .

Promestriene’s potential for treating vaginal atrophy symptoms associated with aromatase inhibitor treatment would be precluded if its minimal absorption leads to estrogen-like effects on cell proliferation and estrogen- responsive gene expression [8] [9] . The concern with absorbed vaginal estrogens or estrogen analogs is that they activate occult sites of residual breast cancer or negate the tumor suppressive effects of aromatase inhibitor adjuvant therapy [9] .

Low dose vaginal estrogen treatments in postmenopausal breast cancer survivors demonstrated low levels of absorption in serum analyzed by ultra-sensitive GC or LC/MS/MS or immunoradio analyses [10] [11] . Most treatment trials with Promestriene were done before these sensitive assays were routinely used for clinical analysis [11] . It is possible that lower but biologically significant Promestriene absorption may have been missed in these trials. In this study, we tested Promestriene for its effects on ER+ breast cancer cell lines to determine if it has estrogen-like activity capable of promoting cancer cell proliferation and estrogen-responsive gene expression.

Estrogen-responsive gene expression was tested using ERalpha and GREB1, two genes known to be activated through estrogen-induced expression and using an epigenetic modification, histone acetylation [12] [13] . ERalpha is the gene encoding the estrogen-responsive subunit of the estrogen receptor itself. GREB1 is the most ER interactive factor induced by estradiol, the predominant form of estrogen found in serum [12] . GREB1 is one of the highest gene expression responses seen in estrogen-induction and has been found to support both estradiol induced ERalpha gene expression and ER function in MCF7 breast cancer cells [13] -[15] . The action of GREB1 in ERalpha expression requires direct chromatin binding at sites in the ERalpha gene locus that overlap with binding of P300/CBP histone acetylase, suggesting it is supporting histone acetylation modification involved in ERalpha gene regulation [13] [16] . GREB1 activity has been shown to be required for growth of ER+ breast cancer cells in vitro [12] [17] and its expression changed with anti-estrogen treatments [12] .

2. Methods and Materials

Estrogen responsive ATCC ER+ breast cancer cell lines MCF-7 (ATCC HTB-22, VA), T-47D (ATCC HTB- 133, VA), and BT-474 (ATCC HTB-20, VA) were obtained directly from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) and used for in vitro dose-dependent, estrogen-like functional responses to Promestriene (PR, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, TX) in both estrogen-rich and estrogen-deprived conditions. As assay controls, cultures were treated in parallel with Fulvestrant (FR) (Sigma-Aldrich, MO), Testosterone (TE) (Sigma-Aldrich, MO), Progesterone (PE) (Sigma-Aldrich, MO) and Estradiol (E2) (Sigma-Aldrich, MO). All cultures were run in triplicate for each analysis run and the complete analysis was repeated twice for statistical comparison.

All cultures were grown to quiescence in phenol-free RPMI medium (ATCC 30-2602, Manassas, VA) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (Cellgro/MediaTech, Manassas, VA) and insulin (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO). To induce estrogen deprivation, cultures were then held 3 days at 37C/5% CO₂ in the same media pre- treated and continuously treated with anti-estrogen specific antibodies (Millipore, Billerica, MA) to sequester estrogen from the culture. Samples were split equally into 12-well cell culture plates for growth and use in RNA and flow cytometry analyzes. Cell lines were treated with each respective test stimulant at 0, 2, 7, 10 & 50 pmol/L concentration for both estrogen replete cultures and estrogen depleted cultures. The cultures were allowed to reach confluence (approximately 72 hours) and then trypsinized and split into fresh 12-well cultures for an additional 24 to 48 hr in culture for proliferation and gene expression analysis.

Dose dependent estrogen-like proliferation responses in the cell lines were measured using flow cytometric analysis of CSFE (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY) mitotic fluorescent dye dilution analyzed with BD Accuri flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA). For the flow cytometry analysis, the data was collected using the BD Accuri C6 software (BD Biosciences, Hercules, CA) and processed using Kaluza Flow Analysis Software (Beckman-Coulter, Miami, FL). Data was compared as percentage of cells dividing compared to quiescent cells using linear regression over treatment concentrations for each cell line using Prism 6 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA) and STATA IC12 (Stata Corp, College Station, TX) statistical software programs.

Estrogen-induced gene expression was measured using GREB1 RNA expression in real time quantitative RT-PCR analysis using TaqMan (Life Technologies). For real time PCR GREB1 expression assay (Hs00536403_ m1), the data was collected using BioRad Mini Opticon 3 software (BioRad, Hercules, CA) and reported as ΔΔCt = (GAPDH ΔCt) − (GREB1ΔCt). Data for each culture treatment were analyzed using linear regression analysis and compared using multi-factorial (ANOVA) or pair-wise analyses to determine the significance of estrogen-like responses relative to the estradiol and untreated controls using GraphPad Prism 6 Software and STATA IC12 Software. Results were considered significant at p = 0.05.

3. Results

In estrogen sufficient cultures, Promestriene exhibited no cell proliferative properties on MCF-7, BT-474, or T47-D tumor cells, even at very high concentrations (Figure 1). However in estrogen deprivation conditions, low dose Promestriene (2 - 10 pg/ml) stimulated GREB1 expression in all cell lines tested to levels equal to or greater than estrogen (Figure 2). In both estrogen replete and depleted cultures of MCF7 cells, 2 pg/ml Promestriene stimulated GREB1 expression significantly greater than that seen with estradiol (p < 0.0001; Figure 2(a)). For BT-474 cells, there was no significant difference in the GREB1 expression stimulated by 2 pg/ml Promestriene compared to that induced by estradiol in either estrogen-replete or depleted conditions (Figure 2(b)).

However, at 7 pg/ml Promestriene, BT-474 GREB1 mRNA expression was significantly stimulated in estradiol replete cultures compared to estradiol (p = 0.0016; Figure 2(b)). For the T-47D cell line, 2 pg/ml Promestriene stimulation of GREB1 expression was significantly higher than that seen with estradiol in estrogen replete conditions (p = 0.0027; Figure 2(c)), but not significantly different than estrogen in estrogen depleted conditions. However, at 7 pg/ml Promestriene stimulation, T-47D cells were significantly stimulated compared to estradiol in estradiol depleted conditions (p < 0.0001; Figure 2(c)).

4. Discussion

Our studies findings are consistent with literature reports that unlike estradiol, Promestriene does not induce significant breast cancer cell growth at concentrations greater than 10 pg/ml (>10 pg/ml) [7] [8] . However, Promestriene’s ability to stimulate GREB1 expression in ER+ breast cancer cell lines at concentrations less than 10 pg/ml gives evidence of its potential estrogenic effect in anti-estrogen treated breast cells. Promestriene provided stimulation in estrogen deprived conditions may be allowing cells to be activated through 1) an alternate signaling pathway [18] , 2) flexibility in their receptor binding for analogs [12] [13] [18] , and/or 3) increased expression or sensitivity of their estrogen receptors [12] [13] [18] . The role of chromatin epigenetic regulation of estrogen responsiveness has come to light as a potential treatment target for reversing hormone therapy resistant breast cancers, suggesting further study of the role GREB1 can play in this mechanism of gene activation in breast cancer is needed [19] [20] . These findings suggest that though the use of Promestriene to treat the symptoms associated with vaginal atrophy in postmenopausal women may be of clinical value, its potential as a treatment for aromatase inhibitor treatment-associated vaginal atrophy is questionable [9] [12] .

5. Conclusion

The potential for Promestriene to stimulate estrogen-inducible gene expression in estrogen-deprived conditions, suggests caution should be used when prescribing it for breast cancer patients on aromatase inhibitor therapies. The mechanism of its estrogen-like functions for activating growth and gene expression in ER+ breast cancer cells warrants further investigation.

Funding

This work was supported by the generosity of the contributors to the Florida Hospital Foundation.

Acknowledgements

The authors also wish to thank James Rae, PhD and Georgine Lamvu, MD for expert advice, and Ms. Mimi Shao and Ms. Stephanie Dickstein for intellectual discussions and professional editorial review of the manuscript.

Cite this paper

Alvin J. O.Almodovar,XiangZhu,Sally A.Litherland,David A.Decker,11, (2015) Promestriene Affects GREB1 Expression in Estrogen Sensitive Breast Cancer Cells. Journal of Cancer Therapy,06,767-772. doi: 10.4236/jct.2015.69084

References

NOTES

^*Corresponding author.