Natural Science
Vol.09 No.02(2017), Article ID:74352,4 pages
10.4236/ns.2017.92003

Pacific Tropics Are Warmer than Atlantic

Kern E. Kenyon

4632 North Lane, Del Mar, USA

Copyright © 2017 by author and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY 4.0).

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Received: January 17, 2017; Accepted: February 21, 2017; Published: February 24, 2017

ABSTRACT

Pacific tropics are warmer than Atlantic tropics. This can be seen immediately from a world’s sea surface temperature atlas, but readings from it of the latitudinal bandwidths between 80 F isotherms in the open waters of both oceans make this result very clear. Explanations are offered by introducing what has already been proposed for the large-scale surface circulations of the Pacific and incorporating conjectures for the circulation of the upper layer of the South Atlantic.

Keywords:

Tropics, Atlantic, Pacific, SSTs, Cross-Equatorial Currents

1. Introduction

In the western tropics of the South Pacific, the highest SSTs of the whole Ocean are always found. Remarkably these sea surface temperatures are not significantly higher in the southern summer than in winter. Follow this observation followed predictions, based on the heat balance of the surface layer, waiting to be verified by new measurements [1] . Much more SST data exist in the North Pacific from which similar, rather powerful, predictions were originally generated [2] .

With the analyses of above printed data and interpretations in place, the Atlantic Oceans are now approached with certain logical expectations, to summarize: surprises are found starting with the South Atlantic.

First, the tropics of the Pacific are warmer than those of the Atlantic. Why should that be? One measure of the difference between the oceans is that the mean latitude bandwidth of the two 80 F isotherms is more than twice as large (around 40 degrees) in the Pacific as it is in the Atlantic (around 20 degrees) throughout the year (Figure 1). This can be no accident, nor a consequence of inadequate data, and it is not predicted to the best of my knowledge.

Second, there are always two 80 F contours in the Pacific, one in each ocean with the equator in between. Although there are also two 80 F contours in the

Figure 1. Mid-ocean bandwidths (degrees of latitude) for 80 F isotherms in the Pacific (upper) and Atlantic (lower) as a function of month (1 = January, etc.), based on data from Reference [2] .

Atlantic, their distribution is not the same since in 8 months of the year, the southern contour is found to cross the equator at least once, and is nearly entire north of the equator in 6 of those months. That is enough time to strongly su- ggest that some cross-equatorial flows are likely to take place in the Atlantic [There is no comparable evidences for cross-equatorial flow in the Pacific].

Extending our understanding of the coolness of the Atlantic tropics compared with the warmth of the Pacific tropics could lead to practical consequences. For example, one might be able to get a better grip on climate changes, and directly monitoring the location of the equatorial crossing of the 80 F isotherm in the Atlantic could be a sensitive feature to be used as a tool. Monitoring polar features is a less habitable occupation.

2. Figure Guide

To construct Figure 1 the old world atlas of sea surface temperatures was consulted [3] . Latitudinal bandwidths between 80 F temperature contours were read off at five consecutive longitudes in the open ocean, with spacing between readings of five longitude degrees, and then averaged for each of the twelve months. Readings started at 160 E in the Pacific, at 45 W in the Atlantic, and proceeded eastward from them. Without even doing this much work the main result, that the tropical Pacific is warmer than the tropical Atlantic, can be seen at a glance by turning the pages of the atlas. However, being a bit quantitative was judged to be a good thing, and the classical atlas is not available to most readers. Two observations of a more minor nature follow.

In Figure 1, the Pacific (upper) curve suggests no seasonal variation, or at best a very faint one. An explanation of the lack of that characteristic is available based on previous studies [1] [2] . The poleward swelling of the 80 F isotherms in spring and summer are 180 degrees out of phase in the two hemispheres. When the northern 80 F isotherm is moving north in the northern spring and summer, the 80 F isotherm in the southern hemisphere is returning north in the southern fall and winter. Thus, the bandwidth between the two 80 F isotherms remains nearly constant throughout the annual cycle. Since neither individual 80 F cur- ves of latitude versus month is perfectly sinusoidal, the resulting bandwidth between them does not come out to be exactly a straight line. In a perfect world the 180 degree phase shift should be exact because it is imposed by the sun’s regular movement.

Despite the factor of two smaller mean value of the Atlantic (lower) curve, compared to the Pacific curve, there is a bit more of an indication of a seasonal variation in this curve. In fact, a half period can perhaps be justified, six months instead of twelve. It is as if the two hemispheres in the tropical Atlantic are interfering with each other rather than cooperating like in the tropical Pacific, at least from the point of view of the 80 F bandwidth.

3. Discussion

How does an 80 F isotherm, at the sea surface, go from the South Atlantic where it resides for some months, to being partly or mostly in the North Atlantic in some other months, in which there is already an 80 F isotherm existing at all times? Movement of sea surface isotherms in the tropics is more likely to be an indication of surface currents than in other ocean regions because the exchange of heat from the ocean, due to initially absorbed solar radiation, back to the atmosphere is expected to be minimal. Then does the southern 80 F isotherm get pushed north and be caused to advect across the equator? If any pushing is to be done, it is probably by colder water moving north in the surface layer toward the equator form higher southern latitudes. By higher latitude is meant something like 35 S, which parallel is tangent to the southernmost tip of Africa.

Consistent with this idea is the fact that the southern 80 F isotherm reaches its farthest position north of the equator in July and August, which is in the middle of the southern hemisphere winter. For example, along 20 W that isotherm rea- ches 6 N in July and in August 8 N. Further substantiation of the conjecture may be difficult or impossible to attain with presently available data.

Using the shape and orientation of SST isotherms as indicators of surface current movement has a fairly long history, and it is not just restricted to low latitudes. As one example, open the temperature atlas to the first chart: the Atlantic oceans for January. Look in the middle of the South Atlantic at the 75 F isotherm. For 18 degrees of latitude, starting at 11 S and going south, the isotherm wanders about a longitude line (around 12 or 13 W), so that it is more nearly vertical than horizontal! Under open ocean conditions that is unexpected. Could it be a mistake by the draftsman? Probably not. Two different isotherms to the east, and two to the west of the 75 F isotherm have vertical stretches just as prominent. February has similar regions where the isotherms are more nearly north/south, but in all months there are marked sloping segments of the isotherms.

Well known is the idea that if it were up to the sun alone, the isotherms should be parallel to lines of constant latitude. Such statements were put down in print off and on at least ever since Humboldt’s time [4] . A surface current going east/west will not make an isotherm slope or turn vertical; there must be a north/south component to it.

Fitting in with these observations is the notion that the cold equatorward flow and warm poleward flow are moving side by side in the South Atlantic, in contrast to the Pacific where evidence suggests a more vertically stacked arrangement with wide warm poleward flows above cold return flows underneath. In other words, cold northward flows in the South Atlantic are more exposed to the surface, and this may be the main reason that the Atlantic tropics in particular are colder than the Pacific tropics are. Explanations for the side by side solution to the heat balance problem will hopefully come in the future. One naturally wonders why the vertical stacking configuration takes place in the wider ocean whereas the side by side arrangement apparently occurs in the narrower ocean. Also unclear at present for the surface circulation of the South Atlantic, after stu- dies of the Pacific have already been made, is: what is the nature of the permanent wide warm and cold current systems in relation to the seasonal one?

4. Conclusions

Sea surface temperatures equal to or greater than 80 F occur in the tropics of the Pacific and Atlantic Oceans in all months, but the latitudinal bandwidth of those regions is twice as large in the Pacific as it is in the Atlantic on the average, based on data displayed in a world atlas of SSTs. This result is explained by differences in the large-scale surface circulations of the Pacific and Atlantic that are involved with the heat balances of those oceans.

Practical applications of the main observational result include increased understanding of climate changes by monitoring the locations of equatorial crossings of the 80 F isotherm in the Atlantic.

Cite this paper

Kenyon, K.E. (2017) Pacific Tropics Are Warmer than Atlantic. Natural Science, 9, 27-30. https://doi.org/10.4236/ns.2017.92003

References

  1. 1. Kenyon, K.E. (2016) South Pacific’s Non-Seasonal SSTs. Natural Science, 8, 553-556.
    https://doi.org/10.4236/ns.2016.812054

  2. 2. Kenyon, K.E. (2015) Non-Seasonal SSTs of the Western Tropical North Pacific. Natural Science, 7, 605-612.
    https://doi.org/10.4236/ns.2015.713060

  3. 3. No Authors (1942) World Atlas of Sea Surface Temperatures. 2nd Edition, H. O. 225, US Navy, Washington, DC.

  4. 4. Humboldt, A. (1850) Cosmos: A Sketch of a Physical Description of the Universe. Harper and Brothers, 2, 281.