Advances in Pure Mathematics
Vol.06 No.07(2016), Article ID:67304,5 pages
10.4236/apm.2016.67035
Some New Results about Trigonometry in Finite Fields
Amiri Naser*, Hasani Fysal
Department of Mathematics, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran

Copyright © 2016 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/


Received 26 December 2015; accepted 11 June 2016; published 14 June 2016
ABSTRACT
In this paper, we study about trigonometry in finite field, we know that
, the field with p elements, where p is a prime number if and only if p = 8k + 1 or p = 8k − 1. Let F and K be two fields, we say that F is an extension of K, if K ⊆ F or there exists a monomorphism f: K ® F. Recall that
, F[x] is the ring of polynomial over F. If
(means that F is an extension of K), an element
is algebraic over K if there exists
such that f(u) = 0 (see [1] - [4] ). The algebraic closure of K in F is
, which is the set of all algebraic elements in F over K.
Keywords:
Trigonometry, Finite Field, Primitive, Root of Unity

1. Introduction
In this paper, we study about trigonometry in finite field, we know that
, the field with p elements, where p is a prime number if and only if p = 8k + 1 or p = 8k − 1. More generally, what can be said about
in
where
are prime numbers. To attempt to answer the question, for which p,
, we are naturally led to use the formula,
Indeed, if
, we have
and so
, we can choose θ, a suitable 16th root of unity, such that



Let F and K be two fields, we say that F is an extension of K if 








Definition. Let p be a prime number, 


Note that symbol “|” is divisor or divides such that 

Remark. 1) Recall that θ is a primitive kth root of unity if 





2) We can define



Theorem 1. If K is a field with 9 elements and if 𝔽 is a finite extension of K, then the mapping 

Proof. It is obviously that λ is onto and one to one (see [5] [6] ).
Theorem 2. Let θ be a primitive kth root of unity. Then 

Proof: Assume








Conversely, let










Corollary 3. If p ≠ 2 and θ is a primitive kth root of unity, then 

Remark. We observe that since membership of 



Lemma 4. Let θ be a primitive kth root of unity in




taining the ring


Proof. The formal derivative 









Remark. For the basic properties of valuation rings, the reader can consult. In particular, it is worth recalling that each valuation ring is integrally closed in its quotient field K, and so, if




2. Some Properties
Corollary 5. Let (q, 10) = 1. Then 
Proof. Define








and so 

Remark. If in corollary 5 we take


Corollary 6. Assume (2, q) = 1. Then 
Proof. Let



As before letting 


Corollary 7. Let (6, q) = 1. Then
Proof. Let 



Remark. If n = 0 and q = p above we have 
Corollary 8. Let (q, 34) = 1. Then
The Formula in corollary 8 is quite complicated and one is naturally interested to know whether already some subformula of this formula is an element of


Indeed set 
























Corollary 9. Suppose that (q, 34) = 1, Then 



Remark ( [10] [11] ). One could use the formula given in the table at the end of this note to deduce corollary 9,
more easily. Indeed, for example, from c1 and c4 in 




Theorem 10. Suppose (34, q) = 1, Then 

Proof. If 


if either 





and only if






We want to prove that 






Corollary 11. Assume (34, q) = 1. If





Therefore the inclusion 




has been dealt with is lemma 4 from now on we assume
Definition. Let
Theorem 12. Let θ be a primitive kth root of unity. Then 
(i) 
(ii) k has the form 8m + 4 and
(iii) k has the form 8m + 4 and
Proof. Assume









Case (ii), Let 









Case (iii), 

















equivalent to k = 8m + 4 and 
Corollary 13. For any k, either 

Proof. As 


3. Conclusion
We conclude that in the field of real numbers, trigonometric ratios are defined as defined in finite fields. As well as relations between trigonometric ratios hold in the field of real numbers, finite fields are also established under the circumstances.
Cite this paper
Amiri Naser,Hasani Fysal, (2016) Some New Results about Trigonometry in Finite Fields. Advances in Pure Mathematics,06,493-497. doi: 10.4236/apm.2016.67035
References
- 1. Delbaen, F. and Schachermayer, W. (2006) The Mathematics of Arbitrage. Springer, Berlin.
- 2. Karl, G. (1994) Operator Trigonometry. Linear and Multilinear Algebra, 37, 139-159.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03081089408818318 - 3. Lima, J.B. and Campello de Souza, R.M. (2013) Fractional Cosine and Sine Transforms over Finite Fields. Linear Algebra and Its Applications, 438, 3217-3230.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.laa.2012.12.021 - 4. Karl, G. (2010) Operator Trigonometry of Multivariate Finance. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 101, 374-384.
- 5. Lang, S. (1994) Algebra. 2nd Edition, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
- 6. Karl, G. (1997) Operator Trigonometry of Iterative Methods. Numerical Linear Algebra with Applications, 4, 333-347.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1506(199707/08)4:4<333::AID-NLA113>3.0.CO;2-I - 7. John, B. (2008) Geometry and Trigonometry. Engineering Mathematics Pocket Book (Fourth Edition), 105-148.
- 8. Carl, S. and Jeff, Z. (2013) College Trigonometry. Lorain County Community College.
- 9. Gauss, C.F. (1965) Disquisitrones Arithmetica. English Translation, Bravncshweig.
- 10. Chowla, S. (1965) The Riemann Hypothesis Hilbert’s Tenth Problem. Gorden and Breach Science Publishers.
- 11. Honghai, L., George, M.C. and Dave, P.B. (2009) Fuzzy Qualitative Trigonometry. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 51, 71-88.
NOTES
*Corresponding author.








