Advances in Lung Cancer
Vol.04 No.03(2015), Article ID:62912,8 pages
10.4236/alc.2015.43005

Prognostic Clinico-Pathological Features of 99 Cases Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer―Egyptian National Cancer Institute

Hala Aziz Shokralla1*, Mohamed Rahouma2

1Medical Oncology Department, National Cancer Institute, Cairo, Egypt

2Surgical Oncology Department, National Cancer Institute, Cairo, Egypt

Copyright © 2015 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Received 10 December 2015; accepted 18 January 2016; published 21 January 2016

ABSTRACT

Background: Worldwide, lung cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer and causes more deaths than any other cancer. In Egypt; it accounts for 7% of male cancer & 3% in females. It is considered to be 3rd most common cancer in Egyptian males & 6th most common of both sexes. Materials and Methods: A total of 99 advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients who underwent first line platinum containing chemotherapy in our institute were included in this study. All clinical and pathological data were collected from patient’s files retrospectively between 2012-2014. Results: All 99 cases were diagnosed at late stage IIIB-IV (59 cases were IIIB).The median age was 54 years (range: 30 - 70) with 53% of cases are ≥ 54 years. 71% were males with male: female ratio of 2.4:1. All male patients were chronic smokers. The most frequent symptom was coughing (68%). Most of the patients had primary lung cancer in the right lung (77%). The most common histological subtype was squamous cell carcinoma (35.4%) with 54 cases present with PS-I, the remain was PS-II. All cases received platinum containing chemotherapy. The majority of cases experienced a progressive disease 60.6%. The median progression free survival (PFS) was 6 months & median overall survival (OS) was 18 months. We found that PS, disease stage, pathological subtypes and response to treatment statistically affect both median OS & PFS. Age affects only OS. Conclusions: Our analysis suggests that some of clinico-pathological factors & response to first line platinum containing regimens affect both OS & PFS of advanced NSCLC. This may be beneficial as prognostic markers and further studies were needed to aid in identification and treatment of these patients.

Keywords:

Non-Small Cell, Lung Cancer, Clinico-Pathological, Prognosis, NCI Egypt

1. Introduction

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death worldwide. It is estimated that about 1 million people die of cancer every year. Non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) accounts for 80% - 85% of all lung carcinomas. It comprises several histological types, including adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and large-cell carcinoma [1] - [4] . The prognosis of these patients remains poor, with an overall 5-year survival rate of less than 15% despite the advanced therapeutic options available [5] .

In Egypt, lung cancer is the 4th most common cancer in male (8.2%) and nearly 5.7% of all cancers in both sexes [2] .

In the last few decades, however, treatment with new drugs, such as epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs), bevacizumab, and pemetrexed revealed that tumor histology has profound impact on the benefits of a variety of chemotherapy or targeted-therapy regimens for advanced NSCLC [6] . Thus, histology came to be considered a predictive factor for the effectiveness of specific chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC. However, there are no earlier reports on histology as a prognostic factor, that is, a variable determining survival irrespective of the chemotherapy regimen administered.

We undertook this study to investigate the demographic pattern, pathological characteristics and stage at presentation of advanced non-small cell lung cancer at NCI, which is the biggest referral center in Egypt.

2. Materials and Methods

We retrospectively reviewed clinico-pathological data of stage IIIB or IV NSCLC patients who were diagnosed and started first-line chemotherapy at NCI and referred to medical oncology department between 2012 and 2014.

All these patients were diagnosed on clinical, radiological and bronchoscopic examination. The diagnosis was confirmed pathologically in all cases by image guidance cytology or biopsy, bronchio-alveolar lavage and/or bronchoscopy guided biopsy and classified according to WHO histological classification of lung cancer staging was done according to AJCC staging system, 7th edition based on the available clinical and radiological findings. The clinical records of the patients were reviewed in relation with age, sex, family history of lung cancer, clinical presentation, pathological report and stage [7] .

Overall survival (OS) was measured from the date of diagnosis to the date of death from known cause or the date on which the patient was last known to be alive. The PFS was calculated from the date of diagnosis to the date of the first recurrence or last follow-up showing no recurrence [8] .

Descriptive statistics were used for describing the data using SPSS version 22 and results were presented in percentage and simple frequency. Univariate and multivariate analysis were conducted using Cox regression analysis. Kaplan Meier curves were drawn for significant variables. Categorical variables were compared using Chi-square test.

3. Results

We studied 99 cases with advanced disease of NSCLC From 2012 to 2014 who were diagnosed or received first line chemotherapy at medical oncology department-NCI/Egypt. In the entire study, the mean age was 53.4 years (range; 30 - 70). 29 cases (29.3%) of NSCLC occurred in females and 70 cases in males. 22 cases (22.2%) were aged less than 45 years. There was a trend for an increased ratio of males with lung cancer among the younger people 3.4:1 (in whole cases male: female was 2.4:1).

For smoking history, all males in our records was smokers (n = 70) and none of female experienced it. Of 99 patients, no family history of lung cancer was found. Majority of our cases had PS-I (n = 54), the remaining had PS-II. 59% of young patients had performance status ≤1 compared to 41% (9 cases) in older group. The most frequent symptom was cough (68%), dyspnea (50%) thoracic pain (42%), and hemoptysis (24%). Most of the patients had primary lung cancer in the right lung (77%). Squamous cell carcinoma was the leading cell type in this study accounting for 35.4%of tumors, followed by Adenocarcinoma (28.3%) as mentioned in Table 1.

Squamous cell carcinoma occurred more often in 40% of young patients (N = 8); While adenocarcinoma occurs in only 20% (n = 4). We had 59 cases with stage IIIB disease (59.6%), while the remaining were stage IV according to AJCC 7th edition. Regarding the treatment, all cases received platinum containing chemotherapy (cisplatin or carboplatin) according to age, PS and renal functions as per NCI local guidelines.

Sixty cases experienced progressive disease (PD), while the remaining was defined as responders (stable disease, SD or partial response, PR) till end of the study.

The median overall survival was 18 months (Figure 1); while the median progression free survival was 6 months (Figure 2).

Figure 1. Overall survival of 99 cases.

Figure 2. Progression free survival of 99 cases.

Table 1. Resume of histological characteristics of our cases.

We had studied different variable affect both OS & PFS. As regards OS, it was obviously affected by age (p = 0.08), PS (p < 0.001), disease stage (p = 0.045) & response to treatment (p < 0.001), Figure 3 showed difference between OS of progressive disease vs non-progressive; Figure 4 showed the relation between age, PS (using ECOG criteria) and OS.

As regards PFS, we found it statically related to PS (p = 0.005), disease stage (p = 0.05) & response to treatment (p < 0.001) as shown in Figures 5-7).

4. Discussion

The incidence of lung carcinoma in Egypt is rising. NSCLC accounts for 80% - 85% of all lung carcinomas, with a male predominance (M:F ratio: 1.7:1).

Figure 3. Showed difference between OS of progressive disease vs non progressive.

Figure 4. Showed the relation between age, performance status and overall status.

Figure 5. Showed difference between PFS of both responders (SD &PR) vs non responders (PD).

Figure 6. Showed PFS difference according to performance status.

In our cases, The lung cancer incidence rates in females were lower than in males (1:2.4) as previously mentioned by MECC, 2002 & recently by Li et al., 2015 [9] [10] .

Lung cancer generally occurs in people between 50 and 80 years old [11] . However, it has become less rare in patients younger than 45 years over the last decades [12] [13] .

Median age of our cases was 54 years; this is related to the time that cancer takes to develop after starting to smoke leading to the occurrence of more smoking related carcinoma in the older group.

In the literature, conflicting data about young patients’ clinical characteristics and prognosis are recorded [12] - [16] .

These differences might result from different cutoff ages when defining young patients. In this paper, we defined lung cancer in young patients as patients with age 45 years or under as in most publications retrieved in the literature [17] - [19] .

This was in concordance of our results, as we found only 22 cases younger than 45 years.

Tobacco use is by far the most important risk factor in the development of lung cancer. It continues to be the

Figure 7. Showed PFS difference according to disease stage.

leading cause of lung cancer worldwide. Both the duration and intensity of cigarette smoking increases the risk.

Globally, the overall lifetime risk of lung cancer is about 1 in 13 for men and 1 in 16 for women. The risk is much higher for smokers and lower for non-smokers. Unfortunately, despite the therapeutic advances, the prognosis of patients with lung cancer (5-year overall survival rate of 15%) has not changed dramatically in the past 30 years [20] - [23] . Smoking is related to all the major types of lung cancer, including squamous cell carcinoma, small cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma [24] .

Majority of our cases were smokers.

70% of the lung cancers present at advanced stages and are unresectable and hence subjected to platinum- based chemotherapy or radiation therapy.

Furthermore, our results on the presenting symptomatology of the disease are matching with those recorded by ESMO guidelines [25] .

Regarding histologic features, In our study, squamous cell carcinoma is the most common in all age groups. This is matching with Koumarianou et al. (2009),who founded squamous cell carcinoma is more common in older patients (more than 77% are old age) [26] and Novaes et al. (2008) [27] .

No family history in all cases, as with descriptive analysis done 2012 by Bhaskarapillai B et al. [28] .

As regard PS, as previously mentioned in the results, 54 cases were presented with PS-I.

In addition, our young patients seem to have better performance status at diagnosis; 59% of young cases (≤45) had PS-I, While in patients >45 only 53 % had PS-I.

This is matching with Koumarianou A et al. (2009) and Qi Y. et al. 2009 [26] [28] .

As previously mentioned in the results, 39 cases are defined to be responders to treatment (SD or PR), the reminder was PD. No complete response (CR) was achieved as per Koumarianou A et al. (2009) [26] .

All of our cases received platinum containing therapy as per local guidelines. We conducted the present study that found several interesting prognostic factors of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Unfortunately; we have no data as regard early stage disease who presented to our institute to compare with our data. Survival was significantly affected by many factors in our study. OS demonstrated in this study was related to age (p = 0.08), PS (p < 0.001), stage (p = 0.045) & response to treatment (p < 0.001) as previously published by Qi Y. et al., Ou SH et al., and Kawaguchi et al. 2009 [27] - [29] .

PFS was related to PS (p < 0.005), stage (p = 0.058) & response to treatment (p < 0.001) as previously proved by Ou S.H. et al., Kawaguchi et al. [30] [31] .

Finally, although this is an analysis of advanced non-small lung cancer in patients at NCI-Egypt, this publication has some limitations. The main one is its retrospective nature. Besides, Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor mutations, EML4-ALK, Excision repair cross-complementing 1 (ERCC1), or ribonucleotide reductase M1 (RRM1) were not searched in this study and patients did not benefit from inhibitors targeting these mutations [32] .

Therefore, others prospective studies are needed with larger number of cases to define the possible prognostic factors.

5. Conclusion

This was analysis in NCI-Egypt and one of the fewer papers published in the world that were interested in prognostic clinico-pathological issues in advanced non-small lung cancer in Egyptians. We found some of pre- treatment clinico-pathological features and post treatment response to treatment were obviously prognostic in advanced disease.

Cite this paper

Hala AzizShokralla,MohamedRahouma, (2015) Prognostic Clinico-Pathological Features of 99 Cases Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer—Egyptian National Cancer Institute. Advances in Lung Cancer,04,29-36. doi: 10.4236/alc.2015.43005

References

  1. 1. World Health Organization Media Centre. Cancer. Fact Sheet No. 297.
    http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs297/en/

  2. 2. Ibrahim, A.S., Khaled, H. M., Mikhail, N.N.H., Baraka, H. and Kamel, H. (2014) Cancer Incidence in Egypt: Results of the National Population-Based Cancer Registry Program. Journal of Cancer Epidemiology, 2014, Article ID: 437971.

  3. 3. Rawat, J., Sindhwani, G., Gaur, D., Dua, R. and Saini, S. (2009) Clinico-Pathological Profile of Lung Cancer in Uttarakhand. Lung India, 26, 74-76.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-2113.53229

  4. 4. Kumar, B.S., Abhijit, M., Debasis, D., Abinash, A., Ghoshal, A.G. and Kumar, D.S. (2011) Clinico-Pathological Profile of Lung Cancer in a Tertiary Medical Centre in India: Analysis of 266 Cases. Journal of Dentistry and Oral Hygiene, 3, 30-33.

  5. 5. de Mello, R.A., Marques, D.S., Medeiros, R. and Araujo, A.M. (2011) Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor and K-Ras in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer-Molecular Pathways Involved and Targeted Therapies. World Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2, 367-76. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
    http://dx.doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v2.i11.367

  6. 6. Dempke, W.C. (2015) Targeted Therapy for NSCLC—A Double-Edged Sword? Anticancer Research, 35, 2503-12.

  7. 7. Novaes, F.T., Cataneo, D.C., Ruiz Junior, R.L., Defaveri, J., Michelin, O.C. and Cataneo, A.J. (2008) Lung Cancer: Histology, Staging, Treatment and Survival. Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia, 34, 595-600.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1806-37132008000800009

  8. 8. Shimada, Y., Saji, H., Kato, Y., Kudo, Y., Maeda, J., Yoshida, K., et al. (2015) The Frequency and Prognostic Impact of Pathological Microscopic Vascular Invasion According to Tumor Size in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Chest. Downloaded From:
    http://journal.publications.chestnet.org

  9. 9. Freedman, L.S., Edwards, B.K., Ries, L.A. and Young, J.L. (2002) Cancer Incidence in Four Member Countries (Cyprus, Egypt, Israel, and Jordan) of the Middle East Cancer Consortium (MECC) Compared with US SEER.

  10. 10. Li, J., Wei, Z., Li, H., Dang, Q., Zhang, Z., Wang, L., et al. (2015) Clinico-Pathological Significance of Fibroblast Growth Factor 1 in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Human Pathology, 46, 1821-1828.

  11. 11. Ramalingam, S., Pawlish, K., Gadgeel, S., Demers, R. and Kalemkerian, G.P. (1998) Lung Cancer in Young Patients: Analysis of a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Database. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 16, 651-657.

  12. 12. Mauri, D., Pentheroudakis, G., Bafaloukos, D., Pectasides, D., Samantas, E., et al. (2006) Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in the Young: Aretrospective Analysis of Diagnosis, Management and Outcome Data. Anticancer Research, 26, 3175-3181.

  13. 13. Yang, P., Bamlet, W.R., Ebbert, J.O., Taylor, W.R. and de Andrade, M. (2004) Glutathione Pathway Genes and Lung Cancer Risk in Young and Old Populations. Carcinogenesis, 25, 1935-1944.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/carcin/bgh203

  14. 14. Liam, C.K., Lim, K.H. and Wong, C.M. (2002) Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in Very Young and Very Old Malaysian Patients. Chest, 121, 309-310.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1378/chest.121.1.309-a

  15. 15. Skarin, A.T., Herbst, R.S., Leong, T.L., Bailey, A. and Sugarbaker, D. (2001) Lung Cancer in Patients under Age 40. Lung Cancer, 32, 255-264.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5002(00)00233-6

  16. 16. Radzikowska, E., Roszkowski, K. and Glaz, P. (2001) Lung Cancer in Patients under 50 Years Old. Lung Cancer, 33, 203-211.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5002(01)00199-4

  17. 17. Capewell, S., Wathen, C.G., Sankaran, R. and Sudlow, M.F. (1992) Lung Cancer in Young Patients. Respiratory Medicine, 86, 499-502.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0954-6111(96)80010-2

  18. 18. Kreuzer, M., Kreienbrock, L., Gerken, M., Heinrich, J., Bruske-Hohlfeld, I., et al. (1998) Risk Factors for Lung Cancer in Young Adults. American Journal of Epidemiology, 147, 1028-1037.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009396

  19. 19. Zhang, J., Chen, S.F., Zhen, Y., Xiang, J., Wu, C., et al. (2010) Multicenter Analysis of Lung Cancer Patients Younger than 45 Years in Shanghai. Cancer, 116, 3656-3662.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.25100

  20. 20. Cagle, P.T., Dacic, S. and Allen, T.C. (2011) Genomic Pathology: Challenges for Implementation. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, 135, 967-968.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.5858/2011-0199-EDI

  21. 21. Cagle, P.T. and Allen, T.C. (2012) Lung Cancer Genotype-Based Therapy and Predictive Biomarkers: Present and Future. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, 136, 1482-1491.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2012-0508-RA

  22. 22. Cagle, P.T. and Chirieac, L.R. (2012) Advances in Treatment of Lung Cancer with Targeted Therapy. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, 136, 504-509.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2011-0618-RA

  23. 23. Blot, W.J. and Fraumeni Jr., J.F. (1996) Cancers of the Lung and Pleura. In: Schottenfeld, D. and Fraumeni Jr., J.F., Eds., Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, 2nd Edition, Oxford University Press, New York, 637-665.

  24. 24. US Surgeon General and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2004) The Health Consequences of Smoking. A Report of the Surgeon General.
    http://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/sgr/sgr_2004/index.htm

  25. 25. Eberhardt, W.E., De Ruysscher, D., Weder, W., Le Péchoux, C., De Leyn, P., Hoffmann, H., et al. (2015) ESMO Consensus Guidelines: Locally-Advanced Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). Annals of Oncology, 26, 1573-1588.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdv187

  26. 26. Koumarianou, A., Fountzilas, G., Kosmidis, P., Klouvas, G., Samantas, E., Kalofonos, C., et al. (2009) Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in the Elderly: Clinico-Pathologic, Management and Outcome Characteristics in Comparison to Younger Patients. Journal of Chemotherapy, 21, 573-583.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/joc.2009.21.5.573

  27. 27. Novaes, F.T., Cataneo, D.C., Ruiz Junior, R.L., Defaveri, J. and Michelin, O.C. (2008) Antonio José Maria Cataneo Lung Cancer: Histology, Staging, Treatment and Survival. Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia, 34, 595-600.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1806-37132008000800009

  28. 28. Bhaskarapillai, B., Kumar, S.S. and Balasubramanian, S. (2012) Lung Cancer in Malabar Cancer Center in Kerala—A Descriptive Analysis. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 13, 4639-4643.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2012.13.9.4639

  29. 29. Qi, Y., Schild, S.E., Mandrekar, S.J., Tan, A.D., Krook, J.E., Rowland, K.M., et al. (2009) Pretreatment Quality of Life Is an Independent Prognostic Factor for Overall Survival in Patients with Advanced Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Journal of Thoracic Oncology, 4, 1075-1082.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181ae27f5

  30. 30. Ou, S.H., Ziogas, A. and Zell, J.A. (2010) A Comparison Study of Clinico-Pathologic Characteristics of Southern California Asian American Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Patients by Smoking Status. Journal of Thoracic Oncology, 5, 158-168.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181c8cc62

  31. 31. Kawaguchi, T., Takada, M., Kubo, A., Matsumura, A., Fukai, S., Tamura, A., et al. (2010) Performance Status and Smoking Status Are Independent Favorable Prognostic Factors for Survival in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Comprehensive Analysis of 26,957 Patients with NSCLC. Journal of Thoracic Oncology, 5, 620-630.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181d2dcd9

  32. 32. Schveigert, D., Cicenas, S., Bublevic, J., Askinis, R., Sapoka, V. and Didziapetriene, V. (2010) The Role of Genetic and Other Biomarkers in NSCLC Prognosis. Central European Journal of Medicine, 9, 382-390.

NOTES

*Corresponding author.