. Hence the relatively good antibacterial effect of honey on these bacteria is of clinical significance and indicates the need for further work to identify other locally available honey with significant antibacterial activity.

There were potential limitations to this study. First, the number of clinical isolates tested against the honey samples was limited. Second, the antimicrobial test method and the choice of test organism(s), varies between publications and may be difficult to compare with other published results.

5. Conclusion

The findings from this study indicate that the use of locally available honey for the treatment of wound infections appears promising. However, differences in antibacterial activity exist among available honey depending on their provenance. Further chemical analysis is needed to identify the factors which determine the antimicrobial efficacy of different honey types.

Conflict of Interest

Nothing to declare.

Cite this paper

Dash, N., Panigrahi, D. and Al-Zarouni, M. (2016) Antimicrobial Effect of Honey from the Arabian Gulf Region against Bacterial Isolates from Pus and Wound Swabs. Advances in Microbiology, 6, 745-752. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/aim.2016.610073


  1. 1. Al-Waili, N.S., Salom, K., Butler, G. and Al Ghamdi, A.A. (2011) Honey and Microbial Infections: A Review Supporting the Use of Honey for Microbial Control. Journal of Medicinal Food, 14, 1079-1096.

  2. 2. Israili, Z.H. (2014) Antimicrobial Properties of Honey. American Journal of Therapeutics, 4, 302-323.

  3. 3. Mandal, M.D. and Mandal, S. (2011) Honey: Its Medicinal Property and Antibacterial Activity. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine, 1, 154-160.

  4. 4. Al-Waili, N., Salom, K. and Al-Ghamdi, A.A. (2011) Honey for Wound Healing, Ulcers, and Burns; Data Supporting Its Use in Clinical Practice. Scientific World Journal, 11, 766-787.

  5. 5. Dunford, C. (2005) The Use of Honey-Derived Dressings to Promote Effective Wound Management. Professional Nurse, 20, 35-38.

  6. 6. Basualdo, C., Sgroy, V., Finola, M.S. and Marioli, J.M. (2007) Comparison of the Antibacterial Activity of Honey from Different Provenance against Bacteria Usually Isolated from Skin Wounds. Veterinary Microbiology, 124, 375-381.

  7. 7. Brudzynski, K. (2006) Effect of Hydrogen Peroxide on Antibacterial Activities of Canadian Honeys. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 52, 1228-1237.

  8. 8. Lusby, P.E., Coombes, A.L. and Wilkinson, J.M. (2005) Bactericidal Activity of Different Honeys against Pathogenic Bacteria. Archives of Medical Research, 36, 464-467.

  9. 9. Zainol, M.I., Mohd Yusoff, K. and Mohd Yusoff, M.Y. (2013) Antibacterial Activity of Selected Malaysian Honey. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 13, 129-135.

  10. 10. Al-Jabri, A.A., Al-Hosni, S.A., Nzeako, B.C., Al-Mahrooqi, Z.H. and Nsanze, H. (2005) Antibacterial Activity of Omani Honey Alone and in Combination with Gentamicin. Saudi Medical Journal, 26, 767-771.

  11. 11. Al-Jabri, A.A., Nzeako, B., Al Mahrooqi, Z., Al Naqdy, A. and Nsanze, H. (2003) In Vitro Antibacterial Activity of Omani and African Honey. British Journal of Biomedical Science, 60, 1-4.

  12. 12. Al-Waili, N.S., Akmal, M., Al-Waili, F.S., Saloom, K.Y. and Ali, A. (2005) The Antimicrobial Potential of Honey from United Arab Emirates on Some Microbial Isolates. Medical Science Monitor, 11, 433-438.

  13. 13. Kücük, M., Kolayli, S., Karaoglu, S., Ulusoy, E., Cemalettin, B. and Candan, F. (2007) Biological Activities and Chemical Composition of Three Honeys of Different Types from Anatolia. Food Chemistry, 100, 526-534.

  14. 14. Miorin, P.L., Levy Junior, N.C., Custodio, A.R., Bretz, W.A. and Marcucci, M.C. (2003) Antibacterial Activity of Honey and Propolis from Apis mellifera and Tetragonisca angustula against Staphylococcus aureus. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 95, 913-920.

  15. 15. Mercan, N., Guvensen, A., Celik, A. and Katircioglu, H. (2007) Antimicrobial Activity and Pollen Composition of Honey Samples Collected from Different Provinces in Turkey. Natural Product Research, 21, 187-195.

Journal Menu>>