American Journal of Analytical Chemistry
Vol.08 No.08(2017), Article ID:78804,8 pages

The Use of Eucalyptus Activated Biocarbon for Water Treatment-Adsorption Processes

Roberta M. Nunes, Damaris Costa, Nilce Ortiz*

Center for Environmental Chemistry, Institute for Nuclear and Energy Research-IPEN, São Paulo, Brazil

Copyright © 2017 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY 4.0).

Received: June 29, 2017; Accepted: August 27, 2017; Published: August 30, 2017


A biocarbon after activation process showed the removal percentage of 92% of methylene blue in solution, the equilibrium parameter―RL value was in the interval from 0 to 1, with 46% of surface coverage degree. The Freundlich constant (n) was higher than 1 as an indication of the physical adsorption process. The Radlich-Peterson calculations obtained the higher R2 value which g constant near 1, a high similarity with Langmuir model. Temkin constant B1 was a positive indication of endothermic process. All calculations provided favorable results for the use of activated biocarbon for dye removing and possible for other organic substances.


Biocarbon, Radlich-Peterson, Eucalyptus, Temkin

1. Introduction

Used worldwide as soil amendment the biocarbon was first cited in the literature as “Terra Preta de Indios” (Amazon Dark Earth) because the Brazil is the largest producer with enormous different kinds and quantities of fine biocarbon. The agroindustry produces different biomass as sugar-cane bagasse, wood and paper mill waste, biofuel waste industry and sewage sludge are making Brazil an important actor in biocarbon production and use for different scenarios [1] .

The biocarbon is amorphous materials characterized by its expanded surface area, porosity and the availability of surface active adsorption centers which the ability to bond and remove gases, metals, and organic compounds. Currently, there is an imbalance in the carbon cycle, with CO2 emissions grow to the atmosphere and little Carbon retention by the environment compartments, the direct effect is the necessity to develop methods to sequester the atmospheric carbon for a longer time. Agricultural, forestry, and industrial residues, poultry manure, urban waste, and sewage sludge are potential sources of biomass and biomaterials. Such properties can be used as renewable energy sources and can contribute to significant environmental benefits through the utilization of the by-product, biocarbon, charcoal or biochar.

Thus, the use of organic residues for biocarbon production represents a major contribution in control of contamination of soil and water resources, as well as a valid form of Carbon sequester and retention. Nevertheless, more studies are necessary regarding the activation processes and chemical characteristics that can affect the soil adsorption processes involved in geo-availability of chemical elements, which allows development of measures to decrease leaching and immobilization, in particular for organics and toxic metals pollution [2] .

The biocarbon characteristics result in several mechanisms for toxic substances removal the precipitation and co-precipitation the presence of phosphate ions and carbonate plays a major role in precipitation formation. Also, the high pH level promotes the hydroxide precipitation and possible the cation exchange. It has high CEC, and it could adsorb cations ions in solution or biocarbon and water suspensions. The electrostatic interaction and amount of negative charges in the surface can absorb positive toxic metals by electrostatic adsorption, and the porous structures indicate the physical adsorption by large surface area, the complexation mechanism and the presence of functional groups as phenol-OH, C = C, and C = O complexing and fixing the toxic metals [3] .

The low-cost soil and water treatment are necessary using the biomass after pyrolysis and activation. The biomass is the photosynthetic product resulting from CO2, water, and sun energy. About 90% of the biomass consists of Carbon and Oxygen, with a typical average elementary composition of 50% wt of Carbon and 40 wt% of Oxygen. Other elements are Hydrogen 5 wt% and Nitrogen 1 wt% and trace elements as sulfur and chlorine. The biomass has the cellulose as the primary content and the high pyrolysis temperatures and time conversion rates improve the biocarbon conversion and adsorption capacity but also increase the transportation, furnace maintenance, and total production cost.

The research goal is to reach the enhancement of biocarbon adsorption effectiveness by simple chemical activation process using the parameters optimization and doses adjustments. There are many published works of activated biocarbon responsible for fixing and reducing pesticides and toxic metals on polluted soil and water. Some studies point out the promising biocarbon applications lead to positive results, especially regarding physical, chemical, biological soil properties and also control the mobility of environmental pollutants, such as organics and toxic metals.

The development of a simple chemical, a low-cost biocarbon activation process is the primary goal searched by researcher, environmental scientists and also agriculture business dealers mainly from continental agricultural countries like Brazil.

2. Materials and Methods

The micronized eucalyptus Urophyla biocarbon was a solid waste with low cost and small particle size used in these experiments; the chemical activation improved the surface area and adsorption efficiency. A series of activation processes were performed to absorb and remove methylene blue (MB) from synthetic solutions. The MB adsorption provides valuable measurements about the activation process efficiency.

In literature, there are some biocarbon activation methods, Table 1. The high toxic zinc ions and the high cost of the phosphates made those activation processes difficult to be used in the experiments. The calculations of the adsorbed mass of MB is proportional to the total biocarbon surface area, as follow e.g. 0.254 mg of absorbed MB was an indication of 208 × 10−2 nm2 covered by MB molecule, as surface area [4] [5] [6] .

Langmuir isotherm calculations can be used to quantify and characterize the adsorption processes, Equation (1) and Equation (2). The calculation of surface coverage degree (θ) of the activated biocarbon indicated the activation process efficiency [7] .

C e / q e = 1 / K L + ( b L / K L ) C e (1)

θ = b C e / ( 1 + b C e ) (2)

where: qe is the solid phase equilibrium concentration (mg∙g−1), Ce the liquid phase equilibrium concentration (mg∙mL−1) and KL (mg∙g−1) and bL (L∙mg−1) are the Langmuir constants, and θ is the surface coverage degree.

MB is a potent cationic dye with a maximum spectrophotometric absorption of light around 650 nm, and its molecule occupies an area of about 208 × 10−2 nm2 [7] . The MB adsorbed mass is an important indication of the surface coverage degree (θ) of the activated biocarbon. Figure 1 shows the particle size on water suspension under ultrasonic dispersion Table 2. The distribution of the particle sizes by a laser analyzer shows wide particle distribution from 1.26 μm up to 13.56 mm, but 50% of the particles are small of 6.36 μm.

In literature, there are various chemical, thermal or photo-oxidation processes to quantify the remaining C in the biocarbon residue. In spite of many researches considered the ultimate value the black C and pyrogenic C quantification methods, for the application point of view the BC quantification

Table 1. The comparison of total surface area obtained for biocarbon different activation processes.

Figure 1. Particle size distribution of eucalipthus biocarbon (Cilas Equipment―1064).

Table 2. The removal percentage, Langmuir constants and surface coverage degree obtained for different activation agents.

can be used for comparison but is not and end it self, but rather a means to an end [2] [6] .

The eucalypt biocarbon was analyzed using MEV scanning microscopy. Figure 2 shows the crystalline structure with the high potentiality for surface area enhancement after activation.

Table 2 shows the activation agents used in the experiments. The orbital shaker mixed the biocarbon water suspension with 30 g of biocarbon (diameter <0.074 mm) and 15 g of KCl (PA-analytical grade) or 15 g of KHCO3 (PA) on 400 mL of distilled water for 6 hours. After the mixing period, the filtration step used a glass filtration apparatus with diameter membrane of 0.45 μm separated the suspended solid from the aqueous medium, the laboratory oven at 90˚C for 24 hours dried the solid obtained after filtration. The steam activated biocarbon used a 50 mL of water in a steam pistol applied in an A4 paper filter covered by 30 g of biocarbon, after the application, the biocarbon was dried open in the environment, and the procedure was repeated twice when finally the steam activated biocarbon was collected and dried at 90˚C for 24 h.

The adsorption processes used different MB initial concentrations in the range of 0.5 to 2.0 mg∙L−1 with 1.0 g of activated biocarbon in a controlled environment

Figure 2. SEM micrography of biocarbon sample with 200× and 500× of magnification.

Table 3. Table Langmuir, Freundlich, Radlich-Peterson and Temkin constants.

of pH 5.5 and temperature of 30˚C kept constant. Each 30 minutes of stirring had the collection of MB and biochar suspension promoting the measurement of adsorption processes efficiency and improvement. The centrifugation of the aliquots was for 15 min at 1500 rpm, and the MB solution content was measured using the spectrophotometer UV-Vis VARIAN E1 at λ = 663 nm, and the calibration curves were prepared previously. The systems reached the equilibrium after 120 min of continuous stirring. The equilibrium time of 120 minutes is a clear indication of favourable adsorption kinetics.

3. Results and Discussion

The biocarbon activated with potassium chloride showed the higher surface area and adsorption efficiency followed by the activated with potassium carbonate and finally water steam, Table 3. The adsorption removal percentages were 90%, 88% and 79% respectively. The results obtained using Equation (1) and Equation (2) indicated the surface coverage degree and confirm the most efficient activation with potassium chloride, followed by potassium carbonate and water steam coverage degree (θ) of 2.87%, 5.72% and 6.04%. The correspondent surface areas were 230.0, 145.0 and 121.9 (m2/g).

The potassium chloride and water steam showed promising results for biocarbon activation with high MB removal percentage. The lower KL values for KHCO3 activation indicate possibly the interference of large hydrate HCO 3 anions interfering with the surface adsorption phenomena, reducing the viable adsorption bounding on porous and surface area [7] [8] . The promising results promoted the use of activated biocarbon as a commercial adsorbent for water treatment and confirm the needs of adsorption process studies with parameters optimization and isotherm calculations. The Isotherm calculations of Langmuir, Freundlich, Radlich-Peterson and Temkin used the Equations (3)-(5) respectively [9] [10] .

C e / q e = 1 / Q 0 b + C e / Q 0 (3)

log q e = log K f + 1 / n log C e (4)

ln ( C e / q e ) = g ln C e ln K r (5)

q e = B 1 ln k t + B 1 ln C e (6)

where: Ce = equilibrium concentration (mg∙L−1); qe = amount adsorbed at equilibrium (mg∙g−1); Q0 = adsorption capacity of the material [11] , b = energy of adsorption. The Kf and Kr = adsorption capacity (L∙g1), n = efficiency of adsorption. The constant g is an exponent between 0 and 1 [12] [13] . The constant Kt is the equilibrium binding force (1∙mg−1) and B1 (J∙mol−1) is related to adsorption heat. The biocarbon activated potassium chloride showed 92% of removal percentage with better correlation with Radlich-Peterson isotherm model (Figure 3) [14] [15] .

In literature, there are many studies of biochar adsorption process [16] . The adsorbents as pine wood, pig manure, activated carbon and pulp and paper derived were used and the removal quantities were 3.99, 16.30, 1.66 and 48.30 mg∙g−1 respectively [17] [18] . The findings of the batch sorption of MB suggest the high adsorption capability of the activated biocarbon with KL of 0.94 mg∙g−1 or removal percentage of 92%; The RL value was in the interval from 0 to 1 with 46% of coverage degree. The obtained KL value was similar with those found in literature and was promising considering the use of a natural biomass residue of renewable source and will improve with the optimization of the processes parameters.

Figure 3. Radlich-Peterson isotherm line equation.

The Freundlich n constants higher than 1 were a clear indication of the physisorption as the primary mechanism. The Radlich-Peterson model was the higher R2 which constant g near 1, representing a high similarity with the Langmuir model. The Temkin constant B1 is calculated using the slope of the linear equation with a positive indication of an endothermic process. All calculations provide favorable results for the use of activated biocarbon as a low cost promising adsorbent for dye removing and possible another organic substance.

4. Conclusion

The investigation showed that activated biocarbon derived from eucalyptus biomass was an effective adsorbent for the MB removal from aqueous solutions. The biocarbon with the highest surface area and removal percentage was activated with KCl and fits best to Radlich-Peterson isotherm and the correlation coefficient value R2 was 0.988. For Temkin model, the constant B1 was 0.851 (J∙mol−1) as direct relation with an endothermic process. Thus the biocarbon derived from eucalyptus biomass activated with KCl can be used as an efficient and profitable adsorbent with surface area enhancement.


The authors would like to acknowledge The National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) and São Paulo Research Foundation (Fapesp).

Cite this paper

Nunes, R.M., Costa, D. and Ortiz, N. (2017) The Use of Eucalyptus Activated Biocarbon for Water Treatment-Adsorption Processes. American Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 8, 515-522.


  1. 1. Novotny, E.H., Maia, C.M.B.F., Carvalho, M.T.M. and Madari, B.E. (2015) Biochar: Pyrogenic Carbon for Agricultural Use—A Critical Review. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo, 39, 321-344.

  2. 2. Liu, R., Wang, Y (2017) Comparison of Characteristics of Twenty-One Types of Biochar and Their Ability to Remove Multi-Heavy Metals and Methylene Blue in Solution. Fuel Processing Technology, 160, 55-63.

  3. 3. Hameed, B.H., Tan, I.A.W. and Ahmad, A.L. (2009) Preparation of Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunch Based Activated Carbon for Removal of 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol: Optimization Using Response Surface Methodology. Journal of Hazardous Materials 164, 1316-1324.

  4. 4. Gleysteen, I.F. and Scheffler, G.H. (1960) Structure of Activated Carbons and Adsorption from Solution. Proceedings of the Fourth Conference on Carbon, University of Buffalo, New York, 15-19 Jun 1960. Pergamon Press, ISBN 978-1-4831-9835-4.

  5. 5. Mestre, A. S. et al. (2011) Activated Carbons from Sisal Waste by Chemical Activation with K2CO3: Kinetics of Paracetamol and Ibuprofen Removal from Aqueous Solution. Bioresource Technology, 102, 8253-8260.

  6. 6. Altenor, S. et al. (2009) Adsorption Studies of Methylene Blue and Phenol onto Retriever Roots Activated Carbon Prepared by Chemical Activation. Journal of Hazardous Material, 165, 1029-1039.

  7. 7. Khalili, N.R., et al. (2000) Production of Micro- and Mesoporous Activated Carbon from Paper Mill Sludge. Effect of Zinc Chloride Activation, Carbon, 38, 1905-1915.

  8. 8. Ortiz, N., Pires, M.A.F. and Bressiani, J.C. (2001) Use of Steel Converter Slag as Nickel Adsorber to Wastewater Treatment. Waste Management, 21, 631-635.

  9. 9. Sampranpiboon, P. and Chamkeitkong, P. (2010) Equilibrium Isotherm, Thermodynamic and Kinetic Studies of Lead Adsorption onto Pineapple and Paper Waste Sludges. International Journal of Energy and Environment, 4, 88-98. ISSN 2251-6832 (Online).

  10. 10. Mirzaeil, N., Hossini, H. and Mahvi, A.H. (2016) Equilibrium and Kinetics Studies of Direct Blue 71 Adsorption from Aqueous Solutions Using Modified Zeolite. Adsorption Science and Technology, 7, 1-15

  11. 11. Al Zubaidi, I.A.H., Al Tamimi, A.K.A. and Ahmed, H. (2016) Remediation of Water from Crude Oil Spill Using a Fibrous Sorbent. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 6, 105-114.

  12. 12. Tharaneedhar, V., Senthil, P., Kumar, A., Saravanan, C. and Ravikumar, V. (2017) Prediction and Interpretation of Adsorption Parameters for the Sequestration of Methylene Blue Dye from Aqueous Solution Using Microwave Assisted Corn Activated Carbon. Sustainable Materials and Technologies, 11, 1-11.

  13. 13. Ahmad, R. and Hasseb, S. (2017) Adsorption of PbII on Menthe Piperita Carbon (MTC) in Single and Quaternary Systems. Arabian Journal of Chemistry, 10, 412-421.

  14. 14. Vuono, D., Catizzone, E., Aloise, A., Polichio A., Agostino, R.G., Migliori, M. and Giordano, G. (2017) Modelling of Adsorption of Textiles Dyes over Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes: Equilibrium and Kinetics. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 25, 523-532.

  15. 15. Fan, S., Wang, W.Z., Tang, J. and Li, X. (2017) Removal of Methylene Blue from Aqueous Solution by Sewage Sludge Derived Biochar: Adsorption Kinetics, Equilibrium, Thermodynamics, and Mechanism. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 5, 601-611.

  16. 16. Hu, X., Ding, Z., Zimmerman, A.R., Wang, S. and Gao, B. (2015) Batch and Column Sorption of Arsenic onto Iron-Impregnated Biochar Synthesized through Hydrolysis. Water Research, 68, 206-216.

  17. 17. Lonappan, L., et al. (2016) Adsorption of Methylene Blue on Biochar Microparticles Derived from Different Waste Materials. Waste Management, 49, 537-544.

  18. 18. Mori, A. and Maksimov, I.L. (1999) On the Temkin Model of Solid-Liquid Interface. Journal of Crystal Growth, 20, 297-304.