Open Journal of Geology
Vol.08 No.09(2018), Article ID:86459,18 pages

Copper Oxide Ore Leaching Ability and Cementation Behavior, Mesgaran Deposit in IRAN

Shayan Khakmardan1*, Aref Shirazi1, Adel Shirazy2, Hassan Hosseingholi3

1AmirKabir University of Technology (Tehran Polytechnic), Tehran, Iran

2Shahrood University of Technology, Shahrood, Iran

3Sormak Mining Company, Tehran, Iran

Copyright © 2018 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY 4.0).

Received: July 16, 2018; Accepted: July 31, 2018; Published: August 3, 2018


One of the Iranian copper deposits that is located east of Iran and also known as a primeval one in that area is Mesgaran Field. Old mining works have been clearly seen in the area. Iran is located on global copper belt and as a result it has numerous potential areas as copper deposits. The purpose of this study is identifying possible potentialities of copper mining in less developed regions of Iran with basic modern technologies. In this study, laboratory investigations of this field were done on samples via leaching and the cementation method. According to the study purposes, acid concentration, temperature, time and pulp density were selected as the main factors that were tested in leaching studies. Moreover, pH, temperature, time and the amount of iron powder were factors which were tested for copper cementation. Optimum conditions of leaching studies with 99.11% recovery rate were obtained after 120 grams per liter of H2SO4, 80 degrees Celsius, 2 hours and 100 grams per liter of solid to liquid. On the other hand, optimum conditions of cementation by iron powder were resulted at more than 95% with a pH of 3, 45 degrees Celsius, 1 hour and 1.5 times more than the stoichiometric equation of required iron powder amount to precipitate copper.


Leaching, Cementation, Copper Oxide, Malachite, VMS Copper Deposit

1. Introduction

Mineral processing studies begin from initial exploration stage. As in the exploration using the geostatistics and the detection of the anomalous elements of the economic mineralization in the region [1] , it should be confirmed by analyzing the scale of the laboratory and generalizing it to the industrial scale of the economic existence of these minerals [2]. Remote sensing was used earlier in the initial investigations of the Mesgaran area for potential and detection of general alterations and lithology [3]. And the mineral anomalies of the area were also separated by statistical methods [4]. Copper extraction from raw materials is obtained by two main methods, Pyrometallurgy and Hydrometallurgy [5]. About 80% copper-from-ore is obtained by flotation, smelting and refining; nearly all sulfide type minerals such as Chalcopyrite, Covellite, Chalcocite and Bornite processed by this method which is known as the pyrometallurgy method [5] [6]. The remaining copper minerals proportion is called oxide types, and is treated by acid and bases reagents in the hydrometallurgy method [7] [8].

Nowadays, sulfide minerals are not as pure as 50 years ago to smelt directly in a flash furnace and as a result, these low grade raw materials (less than 1% Copper included) should be processed by the flotation method to reach to an acceptable grade (more than 22% Copper included). After this step, matte smelting, matte converting and refining are applied to the product of the flotation step to obtain copper with more than 99% purity [5] [6].

Oxide minerals as described formerly can be treated by the hydrometallurgy method that contains three main steps 1) Leaching, 2) Solvent Extraction (SX) and 3) Electrowinning (EW) [7] [9] [10] There are other methods to recover copper after leaching [5]. Cementation and Ion Exchange (IX) are the two main methods [5] [7]. Cementation is the basic method of hydrometallurgy that was applied by alchemists many years ago [6]. Cementation is not the most economical, fastest and selective way to recover copper; however it is the cheapest method besides being easy to operate [11].

Sulfuric Acid (H2SO4) is the most common chemical reagent that is used for the leaching of oxide minerals including copper ones [5]. Among the most important factors of leaching are reagent type, temperature, time and pulp density [12] [13].

The principle of cementation is based on electrochemical differences between ions capacity. Lead, Iron, Zinc and Aluminum are respectively the best metals that can recover copper from PLS [6]. Cementation is widely used for Gold recovery from PLS by Zinc powder [14] [15].

This technical note is to report and document initial experimental findings that could lead to a new understanding of the role of Sulfuric Acid in the recovery of copper from oxide minerals.

2. Data and Analytical Procedures

2.1. Geolocation of Mesgaran Copper Deposit

Mesgaran Copper Field is located 29 km south of Sarbisheh City, east of Iran. Accessibility to the field is possible via Nehbandan-Sarbisheh Road. There is no rough topographic area in the field and nearly all of the field is accessible by usual cars. The geological structure of the area contains of mafic and ultramafic rocks. This field is a part of the Gold zone of Ahangaran-Bandan metallogenic province (Figure 1) [16].

2.2. Ore Geology and Mineralization

In Mesgaran mining area Copper mineralization has occurred in pillow-lava and andesite-basalt sequences of eastern Iran (Figure 2). Two mineralization zones were identified as sulfide mineralization with silicified stockworks (primary mineralization) and supergene mineralization. The primary copper mineralization in this region is mostly in accordance to silicified or carbonate veins with epidote and chlorite in volcanic basalt [3].

These veins cross out the volcanic complex as stockworks which include Chalcopyrite, Bournite and Pyrite. In this region, we observed no evidence proving massive deposit or lens shape deposit creation. The main observed minerals

Figure 1. Major geological subdivisions map of Iran [17] and location of mesgaran copper deposit (star).

are sulfide and oxide forms of copper. Malachite, Azurite and lower amounts of Tenorite and native copper in oxide supergene zone and chalcopyrite and bournite as the primary sulfides have been detected. Oxidation and erosion caused geotite and hematite around sulfide minerals like Chalcopyrite and Pyrite (Figure 3). Alteration is observed almost everywhere on the surface but the degree of alteration varies. Generally alteration occurs when rocks react to hydrothermal and magmatic fluids and this reaction leads to chemical and mineralogic changes. Chlorite alteration has occurred in large scale which is a specific form of Propylitic alteration. Al, Fe and Mg rich fluids cased chlorite alteration in basic rocks [18].

In this region, argillic alteration (presence of Montmorillonite mineral) as a secondary alteration process is observed too. Most of the copper is in oxide form on the surface and because of high degree of oxidation and erosion, sulfide mineralization is rare in outcrops so deeper samples are needed to study the deposit. Drilling is the best choice in such situations. According to mineralization and the host rock (pillow lava and andesite-basalt), the mineralization type seems to be categorized as a massive sulfide and redbed type. Generally the mineralization manner (copper mineralization as stockworks), the host rock (pillow lava and andesite-basalt), the deposit development environment (a volcanic part of an

(a) (b)

Figure 2. View of the ophiolite sequence of the region. (a) Mild morphology and hills of ultrabasic rocks in the north of Mesraran; (b) A view of pillow basalt whose outer surface is affected by contact with sea water and cooling and its color and texture have changed.

Figure 3. Sulphide mineralization (chalcopyrite and pyrite) in basalt that has been converted into iron hydroxides, chalcocites and covellite by the supergene processes.

Ophiolite sequence) and the alterations (quartz-carbonate, epidote and chlorite) observed in this region and comparing them to the massive sulfide types leads to classify Mesgaran deposit as a Volcanic Massive Sulfide (VMS) type. But still more studies are needed to prove this claim with higher accuracy [18] [19] (see Figure 4).

2.3. Reagents and Sample Preparation

200 kg of the sample is taken from Mesgaran Field after excavation. Then the sample is crushed by a jaw crusher and milled to obtain minus 120 microns size. After milling, XRF and XRD are applied to the sample to study phases and chemical composition. All tests and devices took place in laboratories of Amirkabir University of Technology. The main copper mineral phase in the sample is malachite and the main mineral phase of the sample is quartz that does not react with sulfuric acid. XRF device was X’Unique II Philips (Table 1).

2.4. Leaching Tests

For leaching tests, sulfuric acid of Merck Company is selected and distilled water is used for dilution. Moreover, a hotplate and 250 ml beaker are used for these tests. The hotplate has a digital temperature regulator and magnetic stirrer. First,

Figure 4. Expression of the complete ophiolitic sequence (left) and its comparison with the existing parts of the ophiolitic sequence of eastern Iran in the Mesgaran mining area (without scale) (right) [19].

the solution is prepared for each test in a beaker together with specified pH and after reaching a defined temperature, a certain amount of copper ore with a size fraction of minus 120 micron is added to the solution for doing leaching tests in certain time periods. Four factors of acid concentrations, temperature, time and pulp density has been studied in three levels by the Taguchi method. As a consequence, L9 Taguchi orthogonal array has been selected for leaching tests. Tests are designed with the Taguchi method and Variance analysis (ANOVA) has been done in Design Expert for leaching tests and Microsoft Excel for cementation tests. The value of each parameter at every level has been presented in Table 2.

2.5. Cementation Tests

The cementation process of copper by iron powder is provided by following equation:

Cu 2 + + Fe Cu + Fe 2 +

As a result of the differences in electrochemical potentials, a reaction will take place. The reaction potential of Iron and Copper is presented in Table 3.

(∆G˚)298= −20.29 − 15.54 = −35.83 Kcal

According to the Gibbs free energy equation, the reaction will be obtained

Table 1. XRF analysis of sample.

Table 2. Levels of factors in leaching tests.

Table 3. Reaction equations of copper and iron.

spontaneously. In order to perform cementation tests, 100 ml of copper ore was dissolved in the solution and added up to a 250 ml beaker, and after regulating pH, the temperature will be adjusted by the hotplate. After these steps, iron powder will be added up to the solution in order to study the test.

In order to study the cementation of copper by iron powder, four parameters of pH, temperature, time and amount of iron powder were optimized in three levels by the Taguchi method. The value of each parameter at every level has been presented in Table 4.

2.6. Taguchi Method

The technique of defining and investigating all the possible conditions in an experiment involving multiple factors is known as the design of experiments. Basically, classical parameter design, developed by Fisher, is complicated and not easy to use. Especially, a large number of experiments must be conducted when the number of the process parameters increases. To solve this problem, Taguchi method uses a special design of orthogonal arrays to study the entire parameter space with a small number of experiments only [20] [21].

Experimental designs were first introduced by Fisher as an agricultural research tool in the 1920s [22]. His primary aim was to obtain the most information possible about a process with the least number of experiments. Experimental designs and optimization methods for chemists and other engineering branches were reviewed by Bayne and Rubin [23] , Debets [24] and Duckworth [25] , Taguchi [26] simplified the application of experimental design by using standardized library of basic designs called orthogonal arrays, along with some simple methods to modify these layout to fit individual situations. His methodology was also developed within an industrial environment and favoured productivity and cost effectiveness over the statistical rigor. Orthogonal arrays were used to assign factors to a series of experimental combinations which results could then be analyzed by using a common mathematical procedure. The main effect of these factors and preselected interactions between the factors were independently extracted. The identification of controlling factors and the quantitation of the magnitude of the effects was emphasized rather than just the identification of statistically significant effects. The number of trial chosen for an experimental design was based on the resolution desired. In a factorial design, one could study main effects as well as interactions between factors. This latter

Table 4. Levels of factors in cementation tests.

characteristic was a major advantage of the technique but a major disadvantage of one-at-a-time variable testing. Main effects and interactions could be confounded, with one another if the experimental design of low resolution were chosen [27] [28].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Leaching Ability

The L9 array leaching tests which are modeled by the Taguchi method are inserted in Table 5.

3.1.1. Effects of Acid Concentration in Leaching

After 9 tests with the Taguchi method, 1 factor diagrams of acid concentration to recovery rate was obtained as shown in Figure 5. The greater acid concentration causes more H+ cation in the solution which increases the recovery rate individually.

3.1.2. Effect of Time in Leaching

According to Figure 6, time factor affect has an increasing role in recovery rate, but optimum conditions should be checked via more tests. Time is always a critical factor in leaching tests which can result in diverse outcomes related to nature of the element. In this study, effect of time is complex due to behavior of sample and related to interaction with other factors.

3.1.3. Effect of Temperature in Leaching

According to chemistry principles, an increase in temperature will result in a progress of elements motion which means it will lead to more reactivity of complex. Based on our test results which can be seen in Figure 7. There is a gradual progress in recovery rate with an increase in amount of the temperature.

3.1.4. Effect of Pulp Density in Leaching

Similar to most leaching tests, increasing the pulp density will cause a decrease

Table 5. L9 array tests with Taguchi method.

Figure 5. Effect of acid concentration on recovery rate in leaching.

Figure 6. Effect of time on recovery rate in leaching.

in recovery rate, where in some tests it has been seen that after a maximum level for pulp density, reactions will come to an end. In this case, the anomaly point has occurred where it is expected to further decrease the recovery rate. Incidentally, the lower level in pulp density will result in a greater recovery rate (Figure 8).

Figure 7. Effect of temperature on recovery rate in leaching.

Figure 8. Effect of pulp density on recovery rate in leaching.

3.1.5. Effect of Factor Interactions in Leaching

According to the obtained models in the software, factor interactions have been investigated to gain better cognition of the process and increase the efficiency of operation. For this purpose, interaction of temperature and pulp density are depicted in Figure 9 where increasing the temperature and decreasing the pulp density results in a greater recovery rate of the operation. Also, interaction of time and pulp density covered in Figure 10 indicate that increasing time and

Figure 9. Interaction of temperature with pulp density on recovery rate.

Figure 10. Interaction of time with pulp density on recovery rate.

decreasing pulp density results in a greater recovery rate of the operation, while time played a twofold role in this diagram. In addition, interaction of time and temperature as shown in Figure 11 where the increasing level of time and temperature together lead to more recovery rate, while time played a twofold role in this diagram once more. The interaction of acid concentration and temperature is shown in Figure 12 where an increase of acid concentration and temperature together caused a greater recovery rate.

Figure 11. Interaction of time with temperature on recovery rate.

Figure 12. Interaction of acid concentration with temperature on recovery rate.

Interaction of acid concentration and time is shown in Figure 13 where, recovery rate stepped up with an increase of acid concentration and temperature together, to further illustrate the factors which are involved in reactions, acid concentration has the most influence besides temperature. The interaction of acid concentration and pulp density is shown in Figure 14, where an increase of acid concentration and a decrease of pulp density results in a greater recovery rate of the operation. More diagrams have been given in Figure 15 where 3D factor diagrams have simplified the interactions cognition.

3.2. Cementation Behavior

3.2.1. Effect of pH in Cementation

According to the obtained diagram in Figure 16, as obtained from the experiments, pH has an increasing linear boost in copper recovery rate curve in cementation operation, which it shows a decrease in amount of H+ cations will

Figure 13. Interaction of acid concentration with time on recovery rate.

Figure 14. Interaction of acid concentration with pulp density on recovery rate.

Figure 15. 3D factor interactions diagrams.

Figure 16. Effect of pH on recovery rate in cementation.

lead to substitution of Copper ions with Iron ions in solution.

3.2.2. Effect of Temperature in Cementation

With a more detailed look at Figure 17, it is obvious that a raise in the temperature level will cause an increase in recovery rate and it is logical from thermodynamic aspects of the reactions.

3.2.3. Effect of Time in Cementation

As it has been seen in Figure 18, after a sharp increasing result of recovery rate from 30 minutes to 60 minutes, the recovery still increases but in a gradual pattern, which shows that the optimum point is 1 hour for further economic aspects. So, according to this diagram the optimum condition of time for cementation of copper with iron powders is about 1 hour.

3.2.4. Effect of Iron Powder on Cementation

The last parameter which is examined in the tests was the total amount of iron powder that is needed for the reaction. Due to test results, increasing the amount of iron powder that is measured by stoichiometric quantities, tends to increase the copper recovery rate of the cementation process (Figure 19).

4. Conclusions

Mesgaran copper field which is also known as one of the primeval mines in east of Iran, was examined with numerous tests to be run as a modern mine with new technologies. As it has been observed, the economic mineral in this field is

Figure 17. Effect of temperature on recovery rate in cementation.

Figure 18. Effect of time on recovery rate in cementation.

Figure 19. Effect of pH on recovery rate in cementation.

malachite which is encompassed by quartz gangues that leads the experiments to leaching tests with H2SO4 instead of flotation or physical separation methods. Hence, after taking samples from the field, the test was designed via the Taguchi and Variance analysis method. Afterward, tests were performed in the Amirkabir University of Technology laboratory to gain optimum conditions of leaching and cementation operation. In the leaching operation, four factors of acid concentration, temperature, time and pulp density have been studied at three levels. Moreover, in order to study copper cementation by iron powder, four factors of pH, temperature, time and amount of iron powder, are optimized at three levels.

Finally, it is found that increasing acid concentration, temperature and time will cause an increase in the copper recovery of ores with the leaching method. On the other hand, increasing pulp density will have a reverse reaction. From another stance, in the cementation process, the recovery rate of copper increased by maximization of pH, temperature and a lower rise in time and iron powder amount. Optimum conditions of leaching studies with 99.11% recovery rate came after 120 gram per liter of H2SO4, 80 degrees Celsius, 2 hours and 100 gram per liter of solid to liquid. In addition, the optimum conditions of parameters during the cementation process with iron powder were obtained at more than 95% with a pH of 3, 45 degrees Celsius, 1 hour and 1.5 times more than the stoichiometric amount of copper.


Technical and data supports from Amirkabir University of Technology (Tehran Polytechnic), Prof. Ardeshir Hezarkhani and Tehranpadir Co. are acknowledged.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Cite this paper

Khakmardan, S., Shirazi, A., Shirazy, A., Hosseingholi, H. (2018) Copper Oxide Ore Leaching Ability and Cementation Behavior, Mesgaran Deposit in IRAN. Open Journal of Geology, 8, 841-858.


  1. 1. Shirazi, A., Shirazy, A., Saki, S. and Hezarkhani, A. (2018) Geostatistics Studies and Geochemical Modeling Based on Core Data, Sheytoor Iron Deposit, Iran. Journal of Geological Resource and Engineering, 6, 124-133.

  2. 2. Alahgholi, S., Shirazy, A. and Shirazi, A. (2018) Geostatistical Studies and Anomalous Elements Detection, Bardaskan Area, IRAN. Open Journal of Geology, 8, 697-710.

  3. 3. Shirazi, A., Shirazy, A. and Karami, J. (2018) Remote Sensing to Identify Copper Alterations and Promising Regions, Sarbishe, South Khorasan, Iran. International Journal of Geology and Earth Sciences, 4, 36-52.

  4. 4. Shirazi, A., Hezarkhani, A. and Shirazy, A. (2018) Exploration Geochemistry Data-Application for Cu Anomaly Separation Based On Classical and Modern Statistical Methods in South Khorasan, Iran. International Journal of Science and Engineering Applications, 7, 39-44.

  5. 5. Schlesinger, M.E., King, M.J., Sole, K.C. and Davenport, W.G. (2011) Extractive Metallurgy of Copper. Elsevier, Oxford.

  6. 6. Habashi, F. (1997) Handbook of Extractive Metallurgy. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Chichester, New York.

  7. 7. Jackson, E. (1986) Hydrometallurgical Extraction and Reclamation. Wiley, New York, Chichester, Horwood.

  8. 8. Burkin, A. (2001) Chemical Hydrometallurgy—Theory and Practice. Imperial College Press, London.

  9. 9. Jergensen, G.V. (1999) Copper Leaching, Solvent Extraction, and Electrowinning Technology. SME, Shaffer Parkway, Littleton.

  10. 10. Van Der Zeeuw, A.J. (1983) Solvent Extraction in the Winning of Copper, Nickel and Cobalt. TU Delft, Delft University of Technology, Delft.

  11. 11. Sinclair, L. and Thompson, J. (2015) In Situ Leaching of Copper: Challenges and Future Prospects. Hydrometallurgy, 157, 306-324.

  12. 12. Liddicoat, J. and Dreisinger, D. (2007) Chloride Leaching of Chalcopyrite. Hydrometallurgy, 89, 323-331.

  13. 13. Tanda, B., Eksteen, J. and Oraby, E. (2017) An Investigation into the Leaching Behaviour of Copper Oxide Minerals in Aqueous Alkaline Glycine Solutions. Hydrometallurgy, 167, 153-162.

  14. 14. Yannopoulos, J.C. (2012) The Extractive Metallurgy of Gold. Springer Science & Business Media, New York.

  15. 15. Adams, M.D. (2005) Advances in Gold Ore Processing, Vol. 15. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

  16. 16. Aghanabati, A. (2004) Geology of Iran. Geological Survey of Iran.

  17. 17. Taherpour Khalil Abad, M., Conrad, M.A., Aryaei, A.A. and Ashouri, A.R. (2010) Barremian-Aptian Dasycladalean Algae, New and Revisited, from the Tirgan Formation in the Kopet Dagh, NE Iran.

  18. 18. Agharezaei, M. and Hezarkhani, A. (2016) Delineation of Geochemical Anomalies Based on Cu by the Boxplot as an Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA) Method and Concentration-Volume (CV) Fractal Modeling in Mesgaran Mining Area, Eastern Iran. Open Journal of Geology, 6, 1269-1278.

  19. 19. Shirazi, A. (2016) Lithology and Economic Geology Surveys of Copper in Mesgaran (South Khorasan) (BS) Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran.

  20. 20. Nian, C., Yang, W. and Tarng, Y. (1999) Optimization of Turning Operations with Multiple Performance Characteristics. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 95, 90-96.

  21. 21. Moghaddam, J., Sarraf-Mamoory, R., Abdollahy, M. and Yamini, Y. (2006) Purification of Zinc Ammoniacal Leaching Solution by Cementation: Determination of Optimum Process Conditions with Experimental Design by Taguchi’s Method. Separation and Purification Technology, 51, 157-164.

  22. 22. Nachtwey, D. and Cameron, I. (1969) Cell Cycle Analysis Methods in Cell Biology. Elsevier, New York, Vol. 3, 213-259.

  23. 23. Bayne, C.K. and Rubin, I.B. (1986) Practical Experimental Designs and Optimization Methods for Chemists. VCH, Deerfield Beach.

  24. 24. Debets, H. (1985) Optimization Methods for HPLC. Journal of Liquid Chromatography, 8, 2725-2780.

  25. 25. Duckworth, W.E. (1968) Statistical Techniques in Technological Research: An Aid to Research Productivity.

  26. 26. Taguchi, G. (1987) System of Experimental Design; Engineering Methods to Optimize Quality and Minimize Costs.

  27. 27. Montgomery, D.C. (2009) Design and Analysis of Experiments. 7th Edition, John Wiley & Sons, New York.

  28. 28. Abdollahy, M. and Shafaei, S.Z. (2004) Optimized Leaching Conditions for Selenium from Sar-Cheshmeh Copper Anode Slimes. Iranian Journal of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, 23, 101-108.