The measurements for the quality of the water were made at eight stations of Ad ügüzel Dam, Yenice Regulator, Sarayk öy Bridge, Feslek Regulator, Yenipazar Bridge, Ayd ιn Bridge, Ko çarl ι Bridge, S öke Regulator located at the Buyuk Menderes River, Turkey. The study was conducted for the period between 2000-2013 for the months of February, April, June, August, October and December. The results received were analyzed for temperature, pH, EC, Cl -, Na, Ca 2+, Mg 2+, K +, , TDS, TH and SS aquaculture. The results of the analyses revealed that although the water pollution in the river showed variations throughout the year, in fact the samples obtained at various locations displayed high levels of pollutants. The “Regulation on Turkish Water Pollution Control” was made use of in classifying the parameters of the water in this study. These parameters were compared with the WHO Guidelines and TS-266. Among the 8 Dams that were included in the study, the best quality of water was measured in the Ad ügüzel Dam, which gave the lowest values; and the levels were measured to be higher in the Saraykoy Station than those of the other dams. There was a severe drought in Menderes Basin in 2007, and therefore the highest annual values were measured for the year 2007. In those years, the levels of the irrigation water decreased as low as 4255 m 3/ha. The SPSS 21 Statistical Analysis Program was made use of in analyzing the data of the study. The One-Way Anova and Tukey Multiple Comparison tests were also used for the analyses of the data as well. The p < 0.05 level was accepted as being significant in the analyses. The distribution of the data was performed by using the Box-plot Graphs. Furthermore, the effects on fish species and the pollution in Büyük Menderes River were also examined in the study.
Water pollution results from adverse changes in physical, chemical, bacteriological, radioactive and ecological features of water sources. Water pollution is a quality change which not only disturb economical stability and but also restrict usage as a result of anthropogenic impacts. FAO is defined as mixing some substances that is harmful and hazardous to living resources and human health, injuring water quality into the water [
Water quality is a very significant issue of critical importance in various nations and especially Turkey there is cause for concern. Naturally, it is expected that freshwater supplies will dwindle in the near future and thus this requires careful examination and monitoring. By monitoring the water quality, it’s possible to understand the effect of pollution and it will assist to manage aquatic resources and to protect aquatic fauna [
Urbanization, tourism, industry, agriculture and other similar human activities on Earth have great impacts on the basin of the Büyük Menderes River. There are also some obstacles that prevent the migration of the fish and also decrease the quality of water. In the past, the river was a precious source of water for drinking for the people living around, and for fishing. Nowadays, on the other hand, it is not possible to be used for irrigation due to the low quality and the influences of the abovementioned factors.
In Turkey, there are many regulations that are being constantly updated as related to water and the effects of pollution on this source. One of these principal regulations is the “Regulation for Control of Water Pollution” printed in official gazette of the Republic of Turkey on the date of 12/31/2004. This regulation is mainly concerned with the fundamental principles to prevent contamination of water resources and their safe usage. The water resources include both freshwater and groundwater resources. Furthermore, the Turkish Standard TS 266 regulates the water use for human consumption. The examined parameters have been compared with TS 266 and WHO guidelines.
Aim of this research focuses on analyzing the influences of the pollutant materials on water quality parameters as well as fish diversity in the Büyük Menderes River Basin. The key chemical parameters of temperature, pH, EC, Cl−, Na, Ca2+, Mg2+, K+,
The Büyük Menderes River is located in the western Anatolia, southwest Turkey, between 37˚6' - 38˚55' North and 27˚36' - 30˚36' East. Borders of the basin which constitutes 3.2% of Turkey’s land surface includes parts of Aydın, Uşak, Denizli, Muğla, Afyon, Isparta, Burdur and İzmir provinces. With 584 km, it is the longest river in the Aegean Region. Many lateral streams feed the river, with the main tributaries being the Çine, Banaz, Çürüksu and Akçay rivers. The majority of small tributaries dry out in summer. As an important river system, the Büyük Menderes includes wetlands such as
Fish Species | Before 2003 | 2003 | 2013 |
---|---|---|---|
Silurus glanis | ü | X | ü |
Anguilla anguilla | ü | ü | ü |
Nemachilus angorae | ü | ü | X |
Cyprinus carpio | ü | X | ü |
Capoeta capoeta bergamae | ü | ü | ü |
Barbus capito pectoralis | ü | ü | X |
Barbus plebejus escherichi | ü | ü | X |
Leuciscus cephalus | ü | ü | X |
Chondrostoma holmwoodi Meandrensis | ü | ü | ü |
Acanthobrama mirabilis | ü | ü | X |
Aphanius anatoliae anatoliae | ü | ü | ü |
Gambusia affinis | ü | ü | X |
Cobitis turcica | X | ü | X |
Hemigrammocapoeta kemali | X | ü | ü |
Gobio gobio | X | ü | X |
Barbus tauricus esherichi | X | ü | X |
Esox lucius | X | ü | X |
Carassius gibelio | ü | X | ü |
Squalius fellowesii | X | X | ü |
Squalius carinus | X | X | ü |
Alburnoides cf. Smyrnae | X | X | ü |
Alburnus cf. | X | X | ü |
Ladigesocypris mermere | X | X | ü |
Vimba mirabilis | X | X | ü |
Barbus pergamonensis | X | X | ü |
Luciobarbus kottelati | X | X | ü |
Pseudorasbora parva | ü | X | ü |
Rhodeus amarus | X | X | ü |
Pseudophoxinus maeandricus | X | X | ü |
Pseudophoxinus maeandri | X | X | ü |
Tinca tinca | X | X | ü |
Gobio maeandricus | X | X | ü |
Esox lucius | X | X | ü |
Aphanius fasciatus | X | X | ü |
Cobitis cf simplicispina | X | X | ü |
Gambusia holbrooki | X | X | ü |
Atherina boyeri | X | X | ü |
Knipowitschia caucasica | X | X | ü |
Lepomis gibbosus | X | X | ü |
Oxynoemacheilus cf. Cinicus | X | X | ü |
Oxynoemacheilus germencicus | X | X | ü |
Syngnathus abaster | X | X | ü |
Liza ramada | X | X | ü |
Ctenopharyngodon idella | ü | X | X |
Işıklı Lake, Bafa Lake, and the Büyük Menderes River Delta. It is also a very important river basin in terms of biodiversity, being subject to the effects of both the Mediterranean and continental climates. The locations of the eight stations selected for this study are shown in
Cine and İkizdere streams. Station 8 is the Söke Regulator, stations of which are polluted by the domestic wastes and pesticide packages coming from the nearby areas.
The quality of the water was measured in 8 stations which are the Adıgüzel Dam, the Yenice Regulator, the Sarayköy Bridge, the Feslek Regulator, the Yenipazar Bridge, the Aydın Bridge, the Koçarlı Bridge, the Söke Regulator. The temperature, pH and conductivity values were measured in the stations. The samples to be used for the measurements were brought to the laboratories as soon as possible to start the analyses. A Mercury Thermometer with 0.1˚C sensitivity was used in the measurements. The Orion pH Meter (Model SA 720) was used to measure the pH. The Jenway conductometer was used to measure the electrical conductivity. The argentometric method was used to measure the chloride; flame photometry was used to measure the sodium and potassium; the Perkin Elmer automatic absorption Spectrophotometer equipment was used to measure the calcium and magnesium; the calorimetric method was used to measure the sulfate; Total dissolved solid (TDS) was measured by TDS meter (Model: HM Digital); Total water hardness (TH) as CaCO3; Suspended Solids (SS) dried at 103˚C - 105˚C. In order to analyze the results, the international algorithmic processes were implemented [
The water parameter measurement (the temperature, pH, EC, Cl−, Na, Ca2+, Mg2+, K+,
Stations | Temperature (˚C) | pH | EC (μs/cm) | Cl (mg/l) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Adıgüzel | 18.46 ± 4.41a | 7.79 ± 0.18d | 785.80 ± 135.23d | 50.81 ± 16.45d |
Yenice | 18.44 ± 4.70a | 7.82 ± 0.26cd | 1213.83 ± 536.30c | 57.99 ± 19.60d |
Sarayköy | 19.67 ± 4.57a | 7.91 ± 0.29ab | 1892.27 ± 658.81a | 160.14 ± 60.24a |
Feslek | 18.52 ± 4.68a | 7.86 ± 0.24bc | 1997.39 ± 676.72a | 145.88 ± 53.64a |
Yenipazar | 19.51 ± 4.71a | 7.90 ± 0.24ab | 1559.16 ± 466.09b | 109.07 ± 39.10b |
Aydın | 20.14 ± 5.52a | 7.97 ± 0.24a | 1425.76 ± 410.95bc | 102.02 ± 40.36bc |
Koçarlı | 19.63 ± 5.18a | 7.95 ± 0.25ab | 1277.23 ± 426.28c | 88.86 ± 40.01c |
Söke | 19.73 ± 5.51a | 7.99 ± 0.26a | 1296.77 ± 428.53c | 94.07 ± 43.03bc |
Values are mean ± SEM. The differences between the amount expressed with different exponential characters in the same column are statistically significant (p < 0.05).
Stations | Na (mg/) | Ca2+ (mg/l) | Mg2+ (mg/l) | K+ (mg/l) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Adıgüzel | 93.97 ± 61.83b | 75.90 ± 25.24e | 38.65 ± 9.59f | 6.20 ± 1.27c |
Yenice | 75.26 ± 36.50b | 85.62 ± 27.79de | 59.44 ± 33.77e | 7.64 ± 2.18b |
Sarayköy | 133.40 ± 68.85a | 149.02 ± 51.90a | 94.30 ± 41.86bc | 8.73 ± 3.67b |
Feslek | 153.30 ± 73.76a | 145.05 ± 46.58a | 109.87 ± 45.58a | 10.85 ± 3.77a |
Yenipazar | 91.57 ± 37.45b | 120.43 ± 42.76b | 99.51 ± 26.20ab | 8.59 ± 3.46b |
Aydın | 96.46 ± 43.27b | 104.09 ± 33.95bc | 84.16 ± 26.09cd | 8.77 ± 3.38b |
Koçarlı | 85.43 ± 43.04b | 96.46 ± 32.32cd | 71.21 ± 25.20de | 8.62 ± 3.62b |
Söke | 90.24 ± 46.51b | 90.39 ± 29.67cd | 71.87 ± 25.47de | 8.30 ± 3.67b |
Values are mean ± SEM. The differences between the amount expressed with different exponential characters in the same column are statistically significant (p < 0.05).
Stations | TDS (mg/l) | TH (mg/l CaCO3) | SS (mg/l) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Adıgüzel | 116.27 ± 52.68e | 493.25 ± 105.04e | 337.56 ± 74.15d | 1.27 ± 1.22cd |
Yenice | 108.38 ± 100.47e | 734.43 ± 275.62d | 359.90 ± 86.34d | 1.14 ± 0.56d |
Sarayköy | 439.26 ± 203.08b | 1284.65 ± 483.99a | 785.87 ± 296.08ab | 2.51 ± 1.42a |
Feslek | 520.81 ± 245.04a | 1379.86 ± 502.26a | 797.90 ± 274.25a | 2.50 ± 1.14a |
Yenipazar | 318.21 ± 169.21c | 1056.31 ± 346.58b | 697.44 ± 198.63b | 2.07 ± 0.91b |
Aydın | 304.68 ± 148.17cd | 957.75 ± 315.38cb | 595.80 ± 167.46c | 1.64 ± 0.79c |
Koçarlı | 254.18 ± 137.04cd | 861.40 ± 307.53cd | 533.65 ± 170.075c | 1.47 ± 0.76cd |
Söke | 241.50 ± 131.78d | 849.85 ± 314.48cd | 511.07 ± 178.28c | 1.54 ± 0.85c |
Values are mean ± SEM. The differences between the amount expressed with different exponential characters in the same column are statistically significant (p < 0.05).
The temperature value was the lowest in the Yenice Regulator (18.44 ± 4.70a mg/l) and the highest in the Aydın Bridge (20.14 ± 5.52a mg/l), which is given in
The pH value was measured as the lowest in the Adıgüzel Dam (7.79 ± 0.18d) and as the highest in the Söke Regulator (7.99 ± 0.26a), which is given in
The EC value was measured as the lowest in the Adıgüzel Dam (785.80 ± 135.23d μs/cm) and measured as the highest in the Feslek Regulator (1997.39 ± 676.72a μs/cm), which is given in
The Chloride was measured as the lowest in the Adıgüzel Dam (50.81 ± 16.45d mg/l) and it was measured as the highest in the Sarayköy Bridge (160.14 ± 60.24a mg/l), which is given in
The Sodium was measured as the lowest in the Yenice regulator (75.26 ± 36.50b mg/l) and it was measured as the highest in the Feslek Regulator (153.30 ± 73.76a mg/l), which is given in
In total hardness Ca and Mg are the most important two elements. They are important for skeleton structure of both aquatic and terrestrial organisms. Also, Mg has an important function in the blood of the human and animals. Water hardness is very important quality criteria for fisheries and drinking [
The Calcium levels were measured as the lowest at Adıgüzel Dam (75.90 ± 25.24e mg/l) and they were measured as the highest at Sarayköy Bridge (149.02 ± 51.90a mg/l), which is given in
In fisheries, 400 mg/L calcium values are accepted as suitable [
The Magnesium was measured as the lowest at Adıguzel dam (38.65 ± 9.59f mg/l) and it was measured as the highest in the Feslek regulator (109.87 ± 45.58a mg/l), which is given in
Büyük Menderes River is poor in potassium and plankton growth is so low. The Potassium levels were measured as the lowest in the Adıguzel Dam (6.20 ± 1.27c mg/l) and they were measured as the highest in the Feslek Regulator (10.85 ± 3.77a mg/l), which is given in
The Sulphate (
in the annual Sulphate (
waters as sulphate. Water quality at Yenice Regulator was I. class in terms of sulphate values while Feslek Regulator was IV. Class. In this region, increase in sulphate originates from land with gypsum.
TDS was measured as the lowest in the Adıgüzel Dam (493.25 ± 105.07e mg/l) and it was measured as the highest in the Feslek Regulator (1379.86 ± 502.267a mg/l), which is given in
TH was measured as the lowest in the Adıgüzel Dam (337.56 ± 74.15d mg/l) and it was measured as the highest in the Feslek Regulator (797.90 ± 274.25a mg/l), which is given in
Regulator was found to be Class II grade.
Sophisticated concentrations of suspended solids can assist as carriers of toxics, which readily cling to suspended elements [
Inland waters can be categorized in 4 classes as per the TWPCR. Class I is defined as the high quality grade water which is usable with quality of drinking water which can be used after disinfection, and also as water for activities that are recreational in nature (such as swimming which requires body to be in contact with water), as well as breeding of trout and other relevant farming activities. Class II is water which is partially polluted and it can be utilized as a drinking water as long as it is treated with advanced methods, and which can also be used for recreational purposes, fish breeding (excluding trout). It is also possible to use Class II water as an irrigation water as long as it can be maintained so that it has the required quality. Class III is actually polluted which can be used for industrial purposes after extensive treatment. However, industries such as food industry or textile related industries are not good candidates due to their need for very high quality water. Class IV is extremely polluted water with far more poor water
quality as compared to class III and thus it shouldn’t be utilized in any circumstance. The studied parameters are also compared with TS 266 and WHO guidelines [
Knipowitschiacaucasica, Hemigrammocapoetakemali, Pseudophoxinusmaeandri, Gobiomaeandricus, Esoxlucius, Gambusiaholbrooki, Tincatinca, Oxynoemacheilusgermencicus, Oxynoemacheilus cf. Cinicus, Cobitiscfsimplicispina, Chondrostomameandrense, Luciobarbuskottelati, Capoetacapoetabergamae, Ladigesocyprismermere and Alburnoides cf. Smyrnaeare endemic species and have little tolerance to pollution in water. The Buyuk Menderes River does not have many of these species. Carassiusgibelio, Pseudorasboraparva and Lepomisgibbosus, which are endangered species, may tolerate pollution more than the abovementioned species. In this context, Carassiusgibelio is found plenty in this particular river (
One of the issues in the river site is to improve quality of water by controlling the sources of pollution that affect the basin. This is a significant challenge as it will require controlling point pollution source as well as diffusing source to achieve. Another challenge is the increase of the population at the basin of the river. The increase in the population also causes an increase in the load of the structures in the region. Furthermore, population increase also causes a higher amount of waste from domestic sources and there will also be crucial deterioration of the quality of water which will be caused by these domestic waste increases. One way to mitigate this problem will be to construct a special sewage management system with appropriate refining and filtering facilities. Furthermore, all activities in the basin must be organized and coordinated so that there is no overlap and also to create efficiency. Naturally, the pollution sources will need to be contained and an efficient control process will need to be implemented to ensure that this containment takes place in a proper manner. The parameters of water quality as well as biological indicators may be analyzed to identify the quality of the water in the river. The microscopic algae, zooplanktons, macro-invertebrates, and the macrophytes may be analyzed for this purpose. Only then can we obtain long-term results and prevent the negative influences of the pollution in water.
Yilmaz, E. and Koç, C. (2016) A Study about Effects of River Water Quality on Fish Living in Büyük Menderes Basin, Turkey. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 8, 1175-1190. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2016.812091