The global innovation of information technology fundamentally reshaped the finance technology and the flourishing development over the past decade. The high coverage of both the internet network and the mobile phone has facilitated Taiwan to become one of the most potential internet finance regions. This study aims to empirically validate the technology acceptance model (TAM 3) for exploring the key factors that influence the internet finance development. SEM was adopted to investigate both the hypothesis and the path coefficient associations among the constructs and their significance. Confirmed factor analysis for the instrument validity and reliability assessment was made. Hierarchy regression was performed to test the moderator effect of experience and voluntariness. This study result found that Taiwan finance customers had high expectations of information security and preferred high technology products with complex functions. The result demonstrated that customer’s Use Behavior was influenced by Perceived of Usefulness, not Perceived of Ease of Use. The moderator effect result in Experience had a positive moderator effect on Objective Usability to Perceived Ease of Use. This research extracted the key factors that influenced the internet finance development in Taiwan for providing both local government and internet finance developing countries guidelines while concurrently developing an internet finance development strategy.
E-commerce with its characteristics of convenience, low cost, fast transaction has fundamentally reshaped the internet finance industry and flourishing development over the past decade. In recent years, the internet network has replaced newspapers and television. The social media of Facebook and Line have had an explosive growth. Mobile Apps have created a new living style of “mobile phone overuse”. The digital age has tremendously impacted on people’s daily lives. For the banking industry, a bank customer no longer has to visit their bank. The internet finance development has had a great impact on both banking marketability and structural transforming. Brett King, in his 2012 publication of BANK 3.0, “Why Banking Is No Longer Somewhere You Go but Something You Do”, mentioned that the bank customer behavior had changed into four stages. These stages are the social media stage, the mobile devices stage, the mobile payment stage, and the final stage; banking is no longer considered as a place to go, but something you do. The marketability of social media from Facebook and LINE can’t be ignored. Mobile devices have become the people’s daily necessities. Mobile payment changed the e-commerce transaction behavior, and the bank industry needed structural transforming to adopt to the digital age’s customer need.
In fact, global internet financial development since 2008 has consisted of a heavy investment flow into the FinTech (Technology and Finance). Investment grew from 1 billion US dollars in 2008 to 40 billion US dollars in 2013. In the year of 2014, there was a high increase to 12.2 billion US dollars, of which the United States accounted for nearly 80%, Europe counted for 12% in second, and the whole of the Asia only accounted for 6% [
Global internet financial development is not entirely limited to the developed countries. In developing countries or undeveloped countries where finance is not well established, these countries have a higher dependence on a successful internet finance platform. For example, Africa has no physical banking entity in most regions, and develops higher degree of internet finance environment, particularly when mobile banking has been created through the high network penetration coverage. The Republic of Kenya, the country with world’s highest coverage of mobile payment, about 89% of the population is familiar with mobile payment, and around 70% of the population uses mobile money.
Taiwan internet financial development has been slower than in other regions, but the banking industry is impacted by the new trend of Bank 3.0, Finance Technology (FinTech) and Taiwan’s regulation. The Financial Supervisory Commission (Taiwan) proposed “The creation of a digitized financial environment 3.0” in 2015 and also unveiled a grand office of financial technology in September 2015 for promoting the transform action plan of financial institutions. However, the key factors that influence the present internet finance development need to be discovered. Government, finance industry, and academic still need to fulfill science gap for exploring those factors which lead to our study motivation.
From the literature review, this study finds that it seems that the global internet finance development is not necessarily related to the maturity of local financial development, but related to the key factors of being accustomed to using a credit card, convenient ATM location, numerous convenience stores, regulation in of e-com- merce business etc. Yet, it is unclear whether these key factors influence FinTech development. This study aims to empirically validate a technology acceptance model for exploring the key factors that influence the internet finance development. This study examines the relation between a customer’s satisfactions in Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). The main purposes of this study include:
1. An empirical validation of the technology acceptance model to extract the key factors that influence the internet finance development in Taiwan.
2. Providing local government and Internet finance developing countries guidelines to utilize when making Internet finance development policy and strategy.
In today’s highly competitive market of rapidly changing businesses environment, all business are using creativity and innovation to provide excellent services for customers to create business opportunities. The internet can be regarded as the nervous system of the 21st century. Through the WWW system, messages between human and systems can be integrated, and thus produce different benefits. Contemporary organizations begin to use neural network advantages of the internet both to provide service and create value. The bank industry will not be absent. The banking industry has been using the information technology to provide electronic financial services to improve the industry’s internal quality, and to provide their customers’ account service. In the internet age, the bank utilized internet characteristics to both increased customer volume, and to reduce transaction costs and worldwide sales [
For financial institutions, online banking not only provides 7 × 24 hours service advantages, but also establishes standardized services, thus reducing labor, service costs, and expanding special service options [
In developed countries like the United States, Great Britain, Canada, Austria, and France, their internet banking systems are rapidly developing. However, for developing countries, their internet finance is still considered an innovative financial service. Acceptance for internet finance will be influenced by different countries and will depend on their different cultural background, social environment and ethnic differences [
From another point of view, developing countries should profit from the financial experience of developed countries, to deploy online banking or internet banking application rapidly. With a chance to implement a “leapfrog” development, developing countries will gain more benefit from financial services of the internet business in comparison with developed countries [
When previous study observe on southern region of Saharan Africa, researcher see that commercial banks are attempting to introduce an online banking system to improve business operations, reduce costs, improve efficiency, and also provide consumers with more convenient services [
In a study concerned with Jordan, survey investigated the customers of a commercial bank who had e-banking services. The result was that customers were concerned with the factors of easy access, reliability, design, cost/ fees/charges, the electronic banking equipment, privacy/risk/and verification. Those factors are all associated with customer satisfaction. The result also demonstrated that technology created business innovation and transformed the business model, thus allowing local banks to provide innovation service through an internet finance platform [
From a TAM research of exploring perceptions of Malaysia customer internet finance and mobile banking services, empirical results show that convenience, design, perceived risk, perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use are the factors to be considered in the internet financial services development stage [
An investigation of which factors will affect the Thailand customer behavioral intentions when using online banking. Proved that quality management and trust are both very important attributes. Online banking not only provides banking services anytime and anywhere, but also reduces costs. The result found that system quality and service quality influence the degree of trust of a typical Thailand customer to begin to use online banking service, but there was a negative influence on the information quality variable [
Information and communication technology (ICT) applications and services development change people’s daily routine indeed. The bank of Greece used the internet finance to provide diversified service. Their study examination of an internet finance quality through a conceptual model had the 7 factors of efficiency, system, usefulness, satisfaction, privacy, enthusiasm, compensation [
In order to discuss the important factor of customer loyalty of online banking, and to measure customer loyalty from different public and private banks in India, researchers explored the relationship of service quality and the key factors of system usefulness, site aesthetics, ease of use, technical performance, reliability, privacy, trust, enthusiasm, and custom made. That result was that customer satisfaction improved customer loyalty [
A research found that 11 key factors influence the Sudan customer use of internet banking which include breakdown frequency of an ATM, an ATM and electronic point of sale (EPOS), inability of access the Internet, technical problems of report mechanism, an inconvenient location, blurred legislation of electronic transactions protection, and both prevention and handling of transaction processing errors problems [
The rapid growth of the internet finance development has fundamentally changed the interaction between banks and their customers, in order to better understand the relationship between the financial service quality, customer satisfaction and loyalty of a developing country. Researchers of South Africa investigated the key factors that influence the customer perception of internet banking service quality. The 7 key factors of online banking which affect customer perception of service quality are included: trust, response speed, ease of use, access accessibility, satisfaction, speed and accuracy, and contact [
As a result of the great leap forward of science and technology, internet finance is not the only means of financial services available on internet applications. Online banking, mobile banking, internet securities companies and internet insurance companies are all parts of the financial transactions platform of internet finance. Internet banking is the banking service that developed as a result of the internet finance. Customer receive different financial services through internet finance. Services include account balance inquiries, transfers, and payments. In addition, customers can enjoy 7 × 24 financial services through the internet finance network without coming to the bank.
In summary, the key factors that influence the internet financial development are not only the Convenience factor. This study summarized the relevant factors from the literature review, and concluded that the key factors that influence the internet finance development are Convenience, Usefulness, Trust, Cost, and User background.
Technology acceptance model (TAM) is the most widely employed model of Technology adoption and usage [
As many scholars questioned about the framework of TAM, Davis made some changes to TAM in 1993. He made use of scholars’ suggestions to improve the technology explanatory power of TAM. The new model used System Design to replace External Variables, and deleted Attitude Toward Using. As a result, Behavioral Intention to Use will influence the Actual system use directly [
For improve the explanatory power of the TAM model, Davis and Venkatesh (2000) proposed TAM 2 with more variables [
moderator variable includes Experience and Voluntariness variables. The cognitive Instrumental Process include Output Quality, Job Relevance, Result Demonstrability influence Perceived Usefulness. The new model is big difference from TAM 1. TAM 2 is shown in
Venkatesh and Bala proposed TAM 3 in 2008 [
This study aims to extract the key factors that influence customer satisfaction in the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), and to explore the relation between the internet finance developed in Taiwan. For improve the explanatory power when compared with TAM1 & TAM2, Venkatesh (2000) TAM 3 of the determinants of Perceived Ease of Use by building on the anchoring and adjustment framing of human decision making was adopted as the research model (shown in
The 16 hypotheses are addressed to test whether the relationship between Subjective Norm, Image, Job Relevance, Output Quality, Result Demonstrability, Computer self-efficiency, Perceptions of External Control, Computer Anxiety, Computer Playfulness, Perceived Enjoyment, Objective Usability, Perceived Ease of Use, Perceived Usefulness, Behavioral Intention, and the result in Use Behavior. Hypotheses H2, H2a-g, H3 are the moderator effect of both Experience and Voluntariness. The hypotheses table is shown in
To measure instrument development, a self-administered questionnaire was developed based on the operational definitions of the constructs. All constructs were measured using a five-point Likert-type scale for each item, anchored between “strongly agree” (coded as 1) and “strongly disagree” (coded as 5), with the midpoint of “neither agree nor disagree” (coded as 3). Because the subjects of this study were confined to the native Taiwanese population, the questionnaire hence was written in traditional Chinese characters.
Model measurement assessment, statistical analysis began with the descriptive statistics in the IBM Spss statistic 21 for the demography information which contributes to realize the characteristics of the data collected. A Six- stage analytical procedure was performed on the data to ensuring that the findings were derived from a well- constructed instrument possessing sound psychometric properties. Stage one demography information analysis realized the characteristics of the data collected. Stage two involved the assessment of reliability analysis for the questionnaire reliability measurement. Stage three, confirmed factor analysis was performed for validity measurement. In stage four, SEM analysis the goodness of fit measurement, the model must be taken into consideration before the structural model was tested. In stage five, the structural model was analyzed to investigate the
hypothesis associations among the constructs and their significance. Hierarchy regression was performed to test the moderator effect both of Experience and of Voluntariness. For stage six, path coefficient was analyzed by SEM technique using Amos software with a maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) approach.
Structural equation modeling analysis required a relatively large sample to maintain both statistical test power and the stability of the parameter estimates. The number of samples depends on the number of attributes and the latent variables within the model. According to Schumacker and Lomax (2010), over 300 samples could archive SEM performance. This study aims to understand the key factors that influence Taiwanese consumers to accept
H1: Subjective Norm has a positive influence on Behavioral Intention of internet finance Service. | H2d: Experience has a positive moderator effect on Perceived Enjoyment to Perceived Ease of Use. | H6: Output Quality has a positive influence on Perceived Usefulness of internet finance Service. | H13: Objective Usability has a positive influence on Perceived Ease of Use of internet finance Service. |
---|---|---|---|
H1a: Subjective Norm has a positive influence on Perceived Usefulness of internet finance Service. | H2e: Experience has a positive moderator effect on Objective Usability to Perceived Ease of Use. | H7: Result Demonstrability has a positive influence on Perceived Usefulness of internet finance Service. | H14: Perceived Ease of Use has a significant difference on Perceived Usefulness of Internet finance Service. |
H1b: Subjective Norm has a significant difference on the image of internet finance Service. | H2f: Experience has a positive moderator effect on Perceived Ease of Use to Perceived Usefulness of internet finance Service. | H8: Computer self-efficiency has a positive influence on Perceived Ease of Use of internet finance Service. | H14-a: Perceived Ease of Use has a positive influence on Behavioral Intention of internet finance Service. |
H2: Experience has a positive moderator effect on Subjective Norm to Behavioral Intention of internet finance Service. | H2g: Experience has a positive moderator effect on Perceived Ease of Use to Behavioral Intention of internet finance Service. | H9: Perceptions of External Control has a positive influence on Perceived Ease of Use of internet finance Service. | H15: Perceived Usefulness has a positive influence on Behavioral Intention of internet finance Service. |
H2a: Experience has a positive moderator effect on Image to Perceived Usefulness of internet finance Service. | H3: Voluntariness has a positive moderator effect on Subjective Norm to Behavioral Intention of internet finance Service. | H10: Computer Anxiety has a negative influence on Perceived Ease of Use of internet finance Service. | H16: Behavioral Intention has a positive influence on Use Behavior of internet finance Service. |
H2b: Experience has a positive moderator effect on Computer Anxiety to Perceived Ease of Use. | H4: Image has a positive influence on Perceived Usefulness of internet finance Service. | H11: Computer Playfulness has a positive influence on Perceived Ease of Use of internet finance Service. | |
H2c: Experience has a positive moderator effect on Computer Playfulness to Perceived Ease of Use | H5: Job Relevance has a positive influence on Perceived Usefulness of internet finance Service. | H12: Perceived Enjoyment has a positive influence on Perceived Ease of Use of internet finance Service. |
H2, H2a-g, H3 are moderator effect.
internet banking. The native Taiwanese population of finance consumers is the target samples used to meet this research objective. A Google survey from April 13th to 30th 2016 was adopted, and the final survey obtained 307 valid samples.
Items assessing demographic characteristics were included in the questionnaire. Participants were asked to report their gender, age, education, and awareness toward their internet finance experience. According to the descriptive statistics result of the demographic information from the samples, 84.7% of the participants had a higher education level “university”. 72.3% of the participants had experience dealing with personal finance through the web, mobile devices, and technology equipment or the internet financial platform. 85.3% of the participants had experience shopping online or shopping on the internet or television. The most commonly used forms of payment were 46.9% by cash and 49.2% by credit card. Participants in the surrounding area have a bank or an ATM or a convenience store or a post office nearby (Multiple choice), the result showed 73.6% had bank, ATM, convenience store and post office in the surrounding area. The result demonstrated that participants were surrounded by a good financial environment. 54.4% of the participants agreed and very much agreed on the question of “I love to use new technology products; therefore, I like to use the internet finance service platform”.
The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient is commonly used to measure reliability of the questionnaires. Hair et al. (1998) stated that alpha and construct-reliability values greater than or equal to 0.70 and a variance-extracted measure greater than 0.50 indicates sufficient scale and factor reliability.
Cronbach’s scores were calculated to assess the internal consistency reliability of the questionnaire. All the results are presented in
Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) of Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) has been used to test the validity and reliability of the instruments. Various tests of Standardized Regression Weights of factor loading, Square Multiple Correlation, Average Variance Extracted and Composite Reliability have depicted improved result with better validity and reliability. The construct validity is determined by the average value AVE (Average Variance Extracted). The Composite Reliability (CR) is intended to determine the consistency of construct validity indicators. Fornell and Larcker (1981) suggested a CR greater than 0.6 and an AVE greater than 0.5. The result demonstrated that all factor loading are greater than 0.5 and the SMC greater than 0.2, both CR and AVE are greater than 0.7 and 0.5, which show a satisfaction of validity and reliability within the instrument (
Structural equation modeling (SEM) is used to verify the relationship between variables, and a path coefficient comparison analysis was adapted for model verification and hypothesis testing. The paths analysis of H1, H1a, H4, H9, H11 and H14a are not supported; however, the remaining 11 hypotheses are significant and are
N = 307 | Frequency | % | N = 307 | Frequency | % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gender | Female | 136 | 44.3% | Your current occupation? | Finance Institute | 95 | 30.9% |
Male | 171 | 55.7% | Non Finance Institute | 166 | 54.1% | ||
Education | High school | 12 | 3.9% | Other | 46 | 15% | |
College | 35 | 11.4% | Your surrounding area had bank or ATM or convenience store or post office. (Multiple choice) | ATM | 1 | 0.3% | |
University | 165 | 53.7% | ATM, convenience store | 8 | 2.6% | ||
Master degree | 76 | 24.8% | ATM, post office, convenience store | 14 | 4.6% | ||
Doctor degree | 19 | 6.2% | convenience store | 8 | 2.6% | ||
Age | 20 years old (below & inclusive) | 38 | 12.4% | convenience store, post office | 5 | 1.6% | |
21 to 30 years old (inclusive) | 65 | 21.2% | bank | 3 | 1% | ||
31 to 40 years old (inclusive) | 46 | 15.0% | bank, ATM | 1 | 0.3% | ||
41 to 50 years old (inclusive) | 78 | 25.4% | bank, ATM, convenience store | 35 | 11.4% | ||
51 to 60 years old (inclusive) | 70 | 22.8% | bank, ATM, convenience store, post office | 226 | 73.6% | ||
Over 60 years old | 10 | 3.3% | bank, convenience store | 3 | 1% | ||
Have you dealing personal financial through the web, mobile devices, technology equipment or internet financial platform? | No | 85 | 27.7% | bank, post office, convenience store | 3 | 1% | |
Yes | 222 | 72.3% | I love to use new technology products, therefore, I like to use the internet finance service platform. | Very much agreed | 59 | 19.21% | |
Will you shopping online through internet or television? | No | 45 | 14.7% | Agreed | 108 | 35.18% | |
Yes | 262 | 85.3% | Neutral | 116 | 37.79% | ||
The frequency of your online shopping | Never | 49 | 16% | Disagreed | 16 | 5.21% | |
About 3 times a year | 89 | 29% | Very much disagreed | 8 | 2.61% | ||
Within 3 - 10 times a year | 92 | 30% | |||||
More than 10 times a year | 77 | 25.1% | |||||
The most commonly used forms of your payment (Single choice) | Cash | 144 | 46.9% | ||||
Credit card | 151 | 49.2% | |||||
Easy card | 12 | 3.9% |
supported in this study. Hierarchy regression analysis was performed for the H2, H2a-g, and H3 moderator tests. From the result, this study found out that the 8 hypotheses of Experience attribute’s moderate effect are not significant, but the H2e of Experience has a positive moderator effect on Objective Usability to Perceived Ease of Use is supported with the moderator effect. The results are shown in
Cronbach’s alpha | N = 307 |
---|---|
19 Latent Variables | 0.971 |
Subjective Norm | 0.894 |
Experience | 0.866 |
Voluntariness | 0.713 |
Image | 0.946 |
Job Relevance | 0.919 |
Output Quality | 0.900 |
Result Demonstrability | 0.778 |
Computer self-efficiency | 0.851 |
Perceptions of External Control | 0.792 |
Computer Anxiety | 0.887 |
Computer Playfulness | 0.853 |
Perceived Enjoyment | 0.814 |
Objective Usability | 0.871 |
Perceived Ease of Use | 0.927 |
Perceived Usefulness | 0.889 |
Behavioral Intention | 0.912 |
Use Behavior | 0.872 |
Cronbach’s α<=0.7 acceptable, 0.8 - 0.9 good, 1.0 excellent.
Latent variables | Question | Factor loading | SMC | CR | AVE | Latent variables | Question | Factor loading | SMC | CR | AVE |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Subjective Norm | A1 | 0.719 | 0.517 | 0.888 | 0.667 | Computer Anxiety | L1 | 0.810 | 0.656 | 0.890 | 0.730 |
A2 | 0.713 | 0.508 | L2 | 0.936 | 0.876 | ||||||
L3 | 0.811 | 0.658 | |||||||||
Image | E1 | 0.910 | 0.828 | 0.946 | 0.855 | Computer Playfulness | M1 | 0.892 | 0.796 | 0.855 | 0.747 |
E2 | 0.940 | 0.884 | M2 | 0.835 | 0.697 | ||||||
Job Relevance | F1 | 0.876 | 0.767 | 0.921 | 0.794 | Perceived Enjoyment | N1 | 0.800 | 0.640 | 0.817 | 0.691 |
F2 | 0.898 | 0.806 | N2 | 0.861 | 0.741 | ||||||
F3 | 0.900 | 0.810 | Objective Usability | O1 | 0.925 | 0.856 | 0.875 | 0.778 | |||
Output Quality | H1 | 0.805 | 0.648 | 0.902 | 0.647 | O2 | 0.836 | 0.699 | |||
H2 | 0.801 | 0.642 | Perceived Ease of Use | P1 | 0.850 | 0.723 | 0.931 | 0.773 | |||
H3 | 0.840 | 0.706 | P2 | 0.827 | 0.684 | ||||||
H4 | 0.766 | 0.587 | P3 | 0.921 | 0.848 | ||||||
H5 | 0.809 | 0.654 | P4 | 0.915 | 0.837 | ||||||
Perceived Usefulness | Q1 | 0.834 | 0.696 | 0.895 | 0.740 | ||||||
Result Demonstrability | I1 | 0.839 | 0.704 | 0.796 | 0.569 | Q2 | 0.873 | 0.762 | |||
I2 | 0.781 | 0.610 | Q3 | 0.873 | 0.762 | ||||||
I3 | 0.627 | 0.393 | |||||||||
Computer self-efficiency | J1 | 0.791 | 0.626 | 0.858 | 0.669 | ||||||
J2 | 0.754 | 0.659 | |||||||||
J3 | 0.901 | 0.812 | Behavioral Intention | R1 | 0.904 | 0.817 | 0.912 | 0.838 | |||
Perceptions of External Control | K1 | 0.805 | 0.648 | 0.795 | 0.660 | R2 | 0.927 | 0.859 | |||
K2 | 0.820 | 0.672 | Use Behavior | S1 | 0.882 | 0.778 | 0.872 | 0.774 | |||
S2 | 0.877 | 0.769 |
Goodness of fit statistics | Acceptable value | N = 307 |
---|---|---|
NFI-normed fit index | 0 - 1 | 0.824 |
IFI-incremental fit index | 0 - 1 | 0.875 |
CFI-comparative fit index | 0 - 1 | 0.874 |
RMSEA-root mean square error of approximation | <0.1 | 0.081 |
Hypotheses | N = 307 | Hypotheses | N = 307 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
H1: Subjective Norm has a positive influence on Behavioral Intention of internet finance Service. | 0.446 | Not supported | H5: Job Relevance has a positive influence on Perceived Usefulness of internet finance Service. | *** | Supported |
H1a: Subjective Norm has a positive influence on Perceived Usefulness of internet finance Service. | 0.482 | Not supported | H6: Output Quality has a positive influence on Perceived Usefulness of internet finance Service. | *** | Supported |
H1b: Subjective Norm has a significant difference on the image of internet finance Service. | *** | Support | H7: Result Demonstrability has a positive influence on Perceived Usefulness of internet finance Service. | *** | Supported |
H2: Experience has a positive moderator effect on Subjective Norm to Behavioral Intention of internet finance Service. | 0.781 | Without moderator effect | H8: Computer self-efficiency has a positive influence on Perceived Ease of Use of internet finance Service. | 0.016 | Supported |
H2a: Experience has a positive moderator effect on Image to Perceived Usefulness of internet finance Service. | 0.581 | Without moderator effect | H9: Perceptions of External Control has a positive influence on Perceived Ease of Use of internet finance Service. | 0.136 | Not supported |
H2b: Experience has a positive moderator effect on Computer Anxiety to Perceived Ease of Use. | 0.263 | Without moderator effect | H10: Computer Anxiety has a negative influence on Perceived Ease of Use of internet finance Service. | *** | Supported |
H2c: Experience has a positive moderator effect on Computer Playfulness to Perceived Ease of Use. | 0.279 | Without moderator effect | H11: Computer Playfulness has a positive influence on Perceived Ease of Use of internet finance Service. | 0.180 | Not supported |
H2d: Experience has a positive moderator effect on Perceived Enjoyment to Perceived Ease of Use. | 0.469 | Without moderator effect | H12: Perceived Enjoyment has a positive influence on Perceived Ease of Use of internet finance Service. | 0.032 | Supported |
H2e: Experience has a positive moderator effect on Objective Usability to Perceived Ease of Use. | 0.01 | With moderator effect | H13: Objective Usability has a positive influence on Perceived Ease of Use of internet finance Service. | *** | Supported |
H2f: Experience has a positive moderator effect on Perceived Ease of Use to Perceived Usefulness of internet finance Service. | 0.894 | Without moderator effect | H14: Perceived Ease of Use has a significant difference on Perceived Usefulness of internet finance Service. | *** | Supported |
H2g: Experience has a positive moderator effect on Perceived Ease of Use to Behavioral Intention of internet finance Service. | 0.397 | With moderator effect | H14-a: Perceived Ease of Use has a positive influence on Behavioral Intention of internet finance Service. | 0.187 | Not supported |
H3: Voluntariness has a positive moderator effect on Subjective Norm to Behavioral Intention of internet finance Service. | 0.855 | Without moderator effect | H15: Perceived Usefulness has a positive influence on Behavioral Intention of internet finance Service. | *** | Supported |
H4: Image has a positive influence on Perceived Usefulness of internet finance Service. | 0.086 | Not supported | H16: Behavioral Intention has a positive influence on Use Behavior of internet finance Service. | *** | Supported |
H2, H2a-g, H3 are moderator test.
The H8, H12, H13 hypotheses are significant supported but the path coefficient are negative. The H12 Computer Anxiety and Perceived Ease of Use path coefficient are negative. The H8 and H13 are positive. The H15 Perceived Usefulness has a positive influence on the Behavioral Intention of internet finance service and the H16 Behavioral Intention has a positive influence on the Use Behavior of the internet finance service has the highest path coefficient of 0.852 and 0.895.
This study adopted Venkatesh and Bala (2008) proposed Technology Acceptance Model (TAM3) to understand the key factors of the consumer acceptance of internet finance and its association with satisfaction. The demography result found that participants with a higher education level, more than 80% have experience of shopping online or shopping through internet or television. Half of the people usually pay by cash or credit card, and are
Hypotheses | N = 307 | Hypotheses | N = 307 | Hypotheses | N = 307 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
H1: Subjective Norm has a positive influence on Behavioral Intention of internet finance Service. | −0.028 | H2f: Experience has a positive moderator effect on Perceived Ease of Use to Perceived Usefulness of internet finance Service. | 0.07 | H10: Computer Anxiety has a negative influence on Perceived Ease of Use of internet finance Service. | −0.110 |
H1a: Subjective Norm has a positive influence on Perceived Usefulness of internet finance Service. | 0.046 | H2g: Experience has a positive moderator effect on Perceived Ease of Use to Behavioral Intention of internet finance Service. | −0.31 | H11: Computer Playfulness has a positive influence on Perceived Ease of Use of internet finance Service. | −0.129 |
H1b: Subjective Norm has a significant difference on the image of internet finance Service. | 0.808 | H3: Voluntariness has a positive moderator effect on Subjective Norm to Behavioral Intention of internet finance Service. | 0.08 | H12: Perceived Enjoyment has a positive influence on Perceived Ease of Use of internet finance Service. | 0.175 |
H2: Experience has a positive moderator effect on Subjective Norm to Behavioral Intention of internet finance Service. | −0.14 | H4: Image has a positive influence on Perceived Usefulness of Internet finance Service. | 0.068 | H13: Objective Usability has a positive influence on Perceived Ease of Use of internet finance Service. | 0.485 |
H2a: Experience has a positive moderator effect on Image to Perceived Usefulness of internet finance Service. | −0.05 | H5: Job Relevance has a positive influence on Perceived Usefulness of internet finance Service. | 0.144 | H14: Perceived Ease of Use has a significant difference on Perceived Usefulness of internet finance Service. | 0.643 |
H2b: Experience has a positive moderator effect on Computer Anxiety to Perceived Ease of Use. | 0.126 | H6: Output Quality has a positive influence on Perceived Usefulness of internet finance Service. | 0.599 | H14-a: Perceived Ease of Use has a positive influence on Behavioral Intention of internet finance Service. | 0.111 |
H2c: Experience has a positive moderator effect on Computer Playfulness to Perceived Ease of Use. | 0.084 | H7: Result Demonstrability has a positive influence on Perceived Usefulness of internet finance Service. | −0.344 | H15: Perceived Usefulness has a positive influence on Behavioral Intention of internet finance Service. | 0.852 |
H2d: Experience has a positive moderator effect on Perceived Enjoyment to Perceived Ease of Use. | −0.56 | H8: Computer self-efficiency has a positive influence on Perceived Ease of Use of internet finance Service. | 0.235 | H16: Behavioral Intention has a positive influence on Use Behavior of internet finance Service. | 0.895 |
H2e: Experience has a positive moderator effect on Objective Usability to Perceived Ease of Use. | 0.262 | H9: Perceptions of External Control has a positive influence on Perceived Ease of Use of internet finance Service. | 0.198 |
surrounded by a good financial environment in a banking facility. Those participants will result in a possibility using an alternative internet finance service. The result also demonstrates that more than 50% participants are willing to deal with their personal finance by using internet finance.
The result of present Perceived Usefulness is the antecedent of internet finance Behavioral Intention and will result in Use Behavior. This research supports Job Relevance, Output Quality, and Result Demonstrability which means the internet’s finance platform’s relative job or financial service quality stability has significant positive influence on the Perceived Usefulness of internet finance service. On the other hand, construct of Result Demonstrability has a negative impact on Perceived Usefulness. The result found that the security of the system is highly important. Taiwan’s finance customers doubt the circumstances of information security and personal privacy, which has resulted in negative impact on Perceived Usefulness. The result also demonstrated that customers’ higher expect for information security had negative influence on Perceived Usefulness. Therefore, internet finance companies should be aware of this problem and improve their information security environment.
The results also found that Perceived Ease of Use has a positive influence on the Perceived Usefulness of the internet finance. The Perceived Ease of Use is the antecedent of Computer self-efficiency, Computer Anxiety, Computer Playfulness, Perceived Enjoyment, and Objective Usability, which means the customer’s perception of ability to use the internet, the degree of preference, feel happy and useful experience, those constructs have a positive influence on Perceived Ease of use. Research demonstrated that Computer Playfulness has a negative correlation with Perceived Ease of Use. Research results confirm that Taiwan’s consumers prefer high technology products with complex function to fulfill their needs. Therefore, Participants have the opposite view-point on the construct of Perceived Ease of Use.
In the TAM3 model, the result was that both Subjective Norm and Image do not have a significant impact on Perceived Usefulness. Perceptions of External Control have no impact on Perceived Ease of Use. Perceived Ease of Use has no impact on Behavioral Intention of internet finance service. The results demonstrated that Subject Norm and Image have no influence on Perceived Usefulness. The internet finance’s Perceptions of External Control have no influence on Perceived of Ease of Use, although it does have an effect on internet finance Ease of Use, but it has no influence on a customer’s Use Behavior. From the moderator effect result, Experience has a positive moderator effect on Objective Usability to Perceived Ease of Use. The remainder hypotheses did not support the moderator effect of Experience. The result also demonstrated that Taiwan customers are facing a brand new experience with internet finance service. Moreover, Experience is not the moderator of Perceived of Ease of Use.
In Taiwan, with it mature environment of finance service, customers can easily to locate a bank, a convenience store, a post office and an ATM. In word, the customers could easily switch their intention to other finance service options. In summary of the key factors that influence Taiwan customers to accept internet finance service, conclusions of this study are as follows:
1. From TAM3, this research supports Job Relevance, Output Quality, and Result Demonstrability which have a positive influence on Perceived Usefulness. Computer self-efficacy, Computer Anxiety, Computer Playfulness, Perceived Enjoyment, and Objective Usability have a positive influence on Perceived Ease of Use. Moderator of Experience, has a moderator effect on Objective Usability to Perceived Ease of Use. Perceived Ease of use has a positive influence on Perceived Usefulness and results in a positive influence on Behavioral Intention.
2. The result demonstrated that as Taiwan finance customers have high expectations about information security, the business environment of internet finance security needs improvement.
3. The result confirms Taiwan’s consumer preferences for high technology products with complex function to fulfill their needs. Perceived Ease of Use is not one of their options.
4. The result also found that Taiwan finance customers can easily locate banks, convenience stores, post offices and ATMs, and demand a high technology product with complex functions. Therefore, the customer’s Behavioral Intention was influenced by Perceived of Usefulness, not Perceived of Ease of Use. This research concludes that when making use of experience of internet finance from other developed countries, Taiwan consumers identify the value of Perceived of Usefulness for switching their Behavioral Intention to an internet finance platform.
The limitations of this study:
1. Research Survey sampling from native Taiwanese population of finance consumers was restricted because of cultural difference, financial maturity and consumer habits. The researcher suggests that future research of internet finance development could concentrate on those factors.
2. A consumer’s cognitive perception of internet finance may affect the results. The author recommends that future researches focus on a specific internet finance platform or discover the differences between the customer groups.
Ming-Chih Chen,Shih-Shiunn Chen,Hung-Ming Yeh,Wei-Guang Tsaur, (2016) The Key Factors Influencing Internet Finances Services Satisfaction: An Empirical Study in Taiwan. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management,06,748-762. doi: 10.4236/ajibm.2016.66069