The aim of the study was to assess the effects of various biopreparations on the growth of the strawberry root system, the number of spores of mycorrhizal fungi, the total number of bacteria in the rhizosphere soil, and the degree of mycorrhizal association in the roots of two strawberry cultivars. The experiment with strawberry plants was established in the spring of 2010 in the Experimental Orchard of the Institute of Horticulture in Dabrowice. The objects of research were “frigo” strawberry plants of the cultivars Elsanta and Elkat. The following experimental combinations were used: control, control NPK (standard NPK fertilization), manure, mycorrhizal preparation Micosat F, Humus UP, Humus Active + Aktywit PM, BioFeed Amin, BioFeed Quality, Tytanit, Vinassa, Florovit Eko, and Florovit Pro Natura. The use of the biopreparation BioFeed Quality resulted in a six-fold increase in root length and a seven-fold increase in root surface area. Compared with NPK fertilization, application of the preparation BioFeed Amin contributed to an eight-fold increase in root volume, and the use of Vinassa increased 24-fold the number of root tips of Elkat strawberry plants. Micosat F and Humus UP caused a five-fold increase in mycorrhizal frequency in the roots of strawberry plants. Micosat F and manure contributed to a two- and four-fold increase, respectively, in the number of spores in the rhizosphere soil. Application of the preparations Humus UP, BioFeed Amin and Florovit Eko doubled the total number of bacteria and filamentous fungi in the rhizosphere soil of strawberry plants of the cultivars Elsanta and Elkat in comparison with NPK fertilization. Fertilization with the biopreparations intensified the growth of the root system and increased the number of spores of AM fungi, mycorrhizal frequency, and the total number of bacteria and filamentous fungi in the soil.
To obtain high yields in intensive horticultural and agricultural production, high levels of mineral fertilization combined with the application of chemical plant protection products are commonly used. This results in a loss of the biological potential and erosion of soils, which leads to deterioration in the quality and fertility of cultivated soils. An alternative to such production is the use of manure, introduction into the soil of straw and natural bioproducts, i.e. biofertilizers, biostimulators, composts and microbially-enriched biopesticides. This applies in particular to fields used for agricultural purposes, to fields that are being prepared for new plantings, and in regions with a high intensity of fruit crops, where there is no possibility of applying the commonly prescribed rotation of crops. The activity of symbiotic microorganisms in the rhizosphere is a factor determining the growth of the plant and its resistance to pathogens [
Research by numerous authors suggests that it is precisely the microorganisms living in a natural symbiosis with plants that releases the components necessary for normal growth and development of plants. In this context, what is important in all communities are the right proportions, development and activity of rhizosphere components, including not only the soil surrounding the roots, but also symbiotic organisms, i.e. rhizosphere bacteria, mycorrhizal fungi, saprotrophic fungi, predatory protozoa and nematodes. The activity of beneficial microflora in the rhizosphere is not only one of the factors determining normal plant growth, but also an important potential source of their resistance to infectious diseases [
The aim of this study was to determine the effects of various bioproducts on root growth characteristics, the number of spores of rbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, and the total number of bacteria in the rhizosphere soil, as well as the degree of arbuscular mycorrhizal association in the roots of two strawberry cultivars Elsanta and Elkat.
The experiment was conducted in the Experimental Orchard of the Institute of Horticulture in Dąbrowice. “Frigo” strawberry plantlets of the cultivars Elsanta and Elkat were planted in the spring of 2010 in 4 replications (each consisting of 20 strawberry plants per plot). The plants were grown at a spacing of 1.0 m ´ 0.25 m with a 0.5-metre-wide isolation strip between the plots. The following combinations were used in a randomized block design:
1) Control (no NPK fertilization, no application of bioproducts);
2) Control NPK (70 kg N ha−1, 60 kg P ha−1, 120 kg K2O ha−1);
3) Manure?“Fertigo” granulated bovine manure (Ferm-O-Feed, Holland);
4) Micosat F (Micosat F12 and Micosat F MS 200, preparations of the Italian company CCS Aosta, a mixture of AM fungi: Glomus species, Trichoderma viride, and rhizosphere bacterial species (Bacillus subtilis, Pseudomonas fluorescens and Streptomyces spp.);
5) Humus UP (product of Ekodarpol; an extract derived from organic manure produced with the help of Californian earthworms);
6) Humus Active + Aktywit PM (products of Ekodarpol; Humus Active?an extract from organic manure produced with the help of Californian earthworms; Aktywit PM?an activator of microbial life, produced on the basis of molasses (containing carbohydrates, mineral nutrients, vitamins and amino acids);
7) BioFeed Amin (product of Koppert; an extract containing plant amino acids);
8) BioFeed Quality (product of Koppert; a seaweed extract containing humic and fulvic acids);
9) Tytanit (product of Intermag Company, mineral stimulator of growth, containing element titanium, amino acids, vitamins, algae extract, humic and fulvic acids, macro and microelements);
10) Vinassa (produced by Mazowiecka Fabryka Drożdży Józefów; a waste from the production of baker’s yeast);
11) Florovit Eko (product of Inco-Veritas; contains lignite, potassium sulphate, phosphate, dolomite, bentonite, and molasses);
12) Florovit Pro Natura (product of Inco-Veritas; contains lignite, urea, potassium sulphate, ammonium phosphate, dolomite, and molasses).
The experiment included control plants that were not fertilized with NPK, nor treated with any bioproducts. There were also control plants that were fertilized with NPK each year in the spring, in doses of 70 kg N ha−1 as NH4NO3, 60 kg P ha−1 as P2O5, and 120 kg K2O ha−1 as K2SO4). Manure was applied at a rate of 1500 kg∙ha−1. Mycorrhizal preparations were applied two times: first, Micosat F12 was applied to the root system when plants were being planted?100 kg∙ha−1, and then, 2 weeks after the first application, Micosat F MS 200 was applied to the leaves at 10 kg∙ha−1. The preparation Humus UP was applied to the soil as a 2% solution at 20 l∙ha−1. Humus Active was applied to the soil as a 2% solution at 20 l∙ha−1 in conjunction with a 1% solution of Aktywit PM applied to the soil at 10 l∙ha−1. The preparation BioFeed Amin was applied to the soil as a 0.5% solution at 5 l∙ha−1. BioFeed Quality was applied to the soil as a 0.5% solution at 5 l∙ha−1. The stimulator Tytanit was applied to eaves as a 0.05% solution at 0.5 l∙ha−1. Vinassa was applied to the soil as a 0.5% solution at 5 l∙ha−1. The fertilizers Florovit Eko and Florovit Pro Natura were applied to the soil at a rate of 1500 kg∙ha−1.
In addition to the applications of the biopreparations Micosat F, BioFeed Amin, BioFeed Quality, Tytanit and Vinassa, fertilization with manure was applied at 750 kg∙ha−1 (
Soil samples (5 g each), collected in July 2013, were placed in distilled water (45 ml) so that 1 ml of the suspension would contain 0.1 g of soil, and then shaken for 40 minutes on a shaker (150 rev∙min−1). The suspension thus prepared was used to make a series of successive ten-fold dilutions (10−2, 10−3, 10−4, 10−5 and 10−6). The dilutions were placed in Petri dishes containing suitable culture media.
The total number of bacteria was estimated by spreading 100 μl portions of the suspension in Petri dishes containing the medium Tryptone Soy Agar 20% (TSA) [
The inoculated Petri plates with 20% TSA were incubated for 7 days at 28˚C and the inoculated plates with Rose Bengal Chloramphenicol Agar were incubated at 25˚C for 5 - 7 days. The microorganisms’ population was estimated by counting the bacterial and fungal colonies that grew in the inoculated petri plates. When calculating the number of bacteria and fungi, only the plates on which the number of colonies was 30 - 300 were taken into account. The results were converted to colony-forming units per 1 gram dry weight of soil (cfu∙g−1 DWs) (
Roots collected in July 2013 (10 g from each replication) were stained according to the method developed at the Rhizosphere Laboratory of the Agrotechnical Department of the Institute of Horticulture [
1) Maceration of root tissues with 10% sodium hydroxide (NaOH) at 65˚C for 30 min.;
2) Washing out roots from the NaOH solution with water―5 min.;
3) Acidification of roots with 10% lactic acid―10 min.,
4) Staining roots with carbol fuchsin for 10 min.;
5) Rinsing roots with water to remove excess dye―10 min.;
6) Preservation and storage of roots in glycerol.
Next, microscopic specimens were prepared by selecting from each replicate 30 the thinnest and the lightest in colour root fragments approx. 1 cm long (3 microscopic specimens were prepared per each replicate), laying them out parallel to one another on a microscope slide containing glycerin, and crushing them with a coverglass. Thus prepared histological specimens were analyzed using a Nikon 50i microscope (with 20×, 40×, 60× and 100× objectives), and photographic records were made of the mycorrhizal structures observed. The degree of root colonization by AGM as assessed using the method of Trouvelot [
Root fragments together with soil were collected at a distance of 15 - 20 cm from the strawberry plants in July 2013, using a cork borer with a volume of 0.5 l. The root system obtained in this way was placed on a sieve and gently rinsed with water to wash away the soil. After drying, the roots were scanned using an EPSON EXPRESSION 10000 XL root scanner. Root growth characteristics were determined using the WinRhizo software [
Rhizosphere soil samples collected in July 2013 from each replication were used to weigh out 100 g portions of the soil for further analysis. They were then placed in bottle containers and made up to 1 l with distilled water. Thus prepared samples were shaken for about 1 h and then placed in a refrigerator (24 h, 4˚C). After 24 h the soil solution was filtered through a column of sieves (in a successive series: 0.5 mm, 0.125 mm, 0.0063 mm, and 0.0045 mm). The soil fraction remaining on each sieve was washed off with distilled water into a Petri dish (120 mm), to which sucrose was added (5 g per dish). Thus prepared samples were examined using a Nikon SMZ 800
Treatment | Root length (cm/plant) | Root surface area (cm2/plant) | Root diameter (mm/plant) | Root volume (cm3/plant) | Number of root tips (per plant) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Control | 306 c | 102 ab | 1.06 b | 2.70 bc | 1407 bc |
Control NPK | 442 d | 136 c | 0.98 ab | 3.34 c | 1604 c |
Manure | 254 bc | 125 b | 1.57 c | 4.93 e | 1162 b |
Micosat + Manure | 357 c | 149 d | 1.33 bc | 4.93 e | 1868 d |
Humus UP | 307 c | 88 a | 0.91 ab | 2.00 ab | 1247 b |
Humus Active + Aktywit PM | 184 a | 94 a | 1.62 c | 3.81 c | 627 a |
BF Quality + Manure | 236 b | 81 a | 1.09 b | 2.19 b | 1126 b |
BF Amin + Manure | 391 cd | 130 c | 1.06 b | 3.45 c | 944 ab |
Manure + Tytanit | 227 b | 75 a | 1.05 b | 1.98 a | 965 ab |
Vinassa + Manure | 373 c | 143 d | 1.22 bc | 4.37 d | 1026 b |
Florovit Pro Natura | 437 d | 127 b | 0.92 ab | 2.92 bc | 1913 d |
Florovit Eko | 509 e | 87 a | 0.55 a | 1.19 a | 4770 e |
Means in columns marked with the same letter do not differ significantly at p = 0.05 according to Tukey’s multiple test.
Treatment | Root length (cm/plant) | Root surface area (cm2/plant) | Root diameter (mm/plant) | Root volume (cm3/plant) | Number of root tips (per plant) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Control | 1409 f | 559 e | 1.24 bc | 17.3 g | 13397 d |
Control NPK | 215 a | 64 a | 0.95 a | 1.53 a | 629 a |
Manure | 418 c | 149 b | 1.13 bc | 4.22 d | 1064 ab |
Micosat + Manure | 477 c | 138 b | 0.92 a | 3.16 c | 1818 b |
Humus UP | 290 ab | 116 b | 1.27 bc | 3.69 c | 837 a |
Humus Active + Aktywit PM | 205 a | 92 ab | 1.42 c | 3.26 c | 994 ab |
BF Quality + Manure | 1412 f | 476 de | 1.07 ab | 12.8 f | 14580 d |
BF Amin + Manure | 1045 d | 410 d | 1.25 bc | 12.8 f | 14090 d |
Manure + Tytanit | 336 b | 109 ab | 1.03 ab | 2.82 b | 945 ab |
Vinassa + Manure | 1183 d | 401 cd | 1.08 ab | 10.8 ef | 15600 e |
Florovit Pro Natura | 1439 f | 346 c | 0.78 a | 6.74 e | 10526 c |
Florovit Eko | 453 c | 156 bc | 1.09 ab | 4.28 d | 1449 b |
Means in columns marked with the same letter do not differ significantly at p = 0.05 according to Tukey’s multiple test.
stereoscopic microscope, fishing out and counting the spores of mycorrhizal fungi found in them [
The results were statistically analyzed using one-way analysis of variance, in a system of random blocks. Multiple comparisons of the means for combinations were performed with Tukey’s test at a significance level of α = 0.05, using Statistica 10 software (StatSoft, Inc., 2011).
The results of the experiments indicate a positive influence of the applied bioproducts on root growth characteristics and the degree of mycorrhizal association in the roots of strawberry plants of the cultivars Elsanta and Elkat. The bioproducts contributed to an increase in the number of spores of AMF AMF and the total number of soil bacteria. The biopreparations: BioFeed Quality, BioFeed Amin, Vinassa and Florovit Eko increased the intensity of root growth (root growth parameters) in strawberry plants in comparison with the control plants fertilized with NPK (
The tested biopreparations also had a positive influence on the degree of mycorrhizal association and the number of AMF s pores obtained from the rhizosphere soil of strawberry plants. Micosat F and Humus UP contributed to a five-fold increase in mycorrhizal frequency, while the preparation Micosat F and manure increased from two to four times the number of spores in the rhizosphere soil of strawberry plants (
The applied biopreparations such as Humus UP, BioFeed Amin and Florovit Eko contributed to a doubling of the total number of bacteria and filamentous fungi in the rhizosphere soil of Elsanta and Elkat strawberry plants compared to NPK fertilization (
Sas Paszt et al. [
Treatment | Mycorrhizal frequency F% | Number of spores | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ELSANTA (%) | ELKAT (%) | ELSANTA | ELKAT | |
Control | 15.6 ab | 14.4 ab | 58 c | 117 d |
Control NPK | 6.67 a | 7.78 a | 35 a | 29 a |
Manure | 25.6 c | 24.4 cde | 72d | 135 e |
Micosat + Manure | 36.7 e | 46.6 f | 83 e | 45 b |
Humus UP | 40.0 e | 30.0 e | 47 b | 47 b |
Humus Active + Aktywit PM | 30.0 cd | 28.9 de | 73 d | 63 c |
BF Quality + Manure | 24.4 bc | 21.1 cd | 39 a | 68 c |
BF Amin + Manure | 26.7 c | 20.0 c | 65 cd | 66 c |
Manure + Tytanit | 21.1 bc | 21.1 cd | 57 c | 56 bc |
Vinassa + Manure | 25.6 c | 25.6 cde | 59 c | 61 c |
Florovit Pro Natura | 26.7 c | 25.6 cde | 81e | 32 ab |
Florovit Eko | 27.8 c | 24.4 cde | 41 ab | 33 ab |
Means in columns marked with the same letter do not differ significantly at p = 0.05 according to Tukey’s multiple test.
Treatment | ELSANTA | ELKAT | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Total number of bacteria × 106 cfu∙g−1 DWs* | Total number of fungi × 104 cfu∙g−1 DWs | Total number of bacteria × 106 cfu∙g−1 DWs | Total number of fungi × 104 cfu∙g−1 DWs | |
Control | 199 d | 50.5 b | 73.9 b | 52.8 b |
Control NPK | 95.0 b | 45.6 ab | 79.0 b | 59.2 b |
Manure | 82.6 b | 39.2 a | 121 c | 60.3 bc |
Micosat + Manure | 74.4 ab | 40.3 ab | 112 c | 62.9 bc |
Humus UP | 113 c | 103 d | 65.3 b | 54.2 b |
Humus Active + Aktywit PM | 67.7 a | 76.9 c | 41.8 a | 53.7 b |
BF Quality + Manure | 65.6 a | 25.7 a | 73.1 b | 56.6 b |
BF Amin + Manure | 41.9 a | 57.7 b | 97.2 bc | 89.3 c |
Manure + Tytanit | 88.9 b | 89.9 c | 54.7 ab | 49.1 ab |
Vinassa + Manure | 94.8 b | 88.3 c | 53.2 ab | 61.5 bc |
Florovit Pro Natura | 60.9 a | 38.8 a | 60.8 b | 62.6 bc |
Florovit Eko | 136 c | 41.6 ab | 142 d | 24.7 a |
*Colony-forming units per 1 gram dry weight of the soil. Means in columns marked with the same letter do not differ significantly at p = 0.05 according to Tukey’s multiple test.
Development and implementation in practice of new microbiological biopreparations is essential for the development of ecological and sustainable methods of crop production. This will increase the competitiveness and profitability of Polish enterprises in the horticultural and agricultural production sector.
1) The cultivar Elkat was characterized by a larger root system and a greater number of spores in the rhizosphere soil than the cultivar Elsanta;
2) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi colonized the roots of Elsanta plants more frequently than those of Elkat. In the rhizosphere soil of the cultivar Elsanta, the reported number of bacteria and filamentous fungi was higher than that of the cultivar Elkat;
3) The tested biopreparations, Micosat F, Humus UP, Humus Active + Aktywit PM, BioFeed Amin, Vinassa, Florovit Eko and Florovit Pro Natura, favorably influenced the intensity of root growth, the degree of mycorrhizal association, the number of spores of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, and the total number of fungi in the cultivar Elsanta.
This publication is part of the project “Development of Innovative Products and Technologies for Organic Cultivation of Fruit Plants” with an acronym EkoTechProdukt, co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund, Innovative Economy Operational Programme 2007-2013, Sub-Measure 1.3.1 OP IE.