The recent IPCC-SREX report focuses on the impact of extreme weather events on societies and underlines the absence of reliable data to assert a solid link between them and the current global climate change. Thanks to the unpublished materials that are contained in historic archives, this article suggests studying the cyclones which affected the Mascarene islands between 1654 and 2007 and which supply us with a catalog of hitherto unpublished events. Inspired by the Simpson-Saffir hurricanes Wind Scale, the research proposes a relative evaluation of the extremes of the region. It underlines the big fluctuations in the last three centuries and partially answers the current debate on the reliability of the data in relation to hurricanes and their link with the contemporary climate. The available archives show that this type of meteorological event has occurred frequently during the relevant historical period and that for that reason, has given rise to original strategies of adaptation on the part of the societies affected. The results presented here constitute new and reliable data which could make an important contribution to the decision-makers and to climatologists trying to design strategies which the populations of small islands facing the climatic hazards of the future will have to adopt.
The very recent SREX [
In response to this assessment a recent piece of research tried to remedy these gaps by suggesting reconstructing an older historic series concerning the cyclonic activity in the southwest of the United States [
Nevertheless, it is possible to widen considerably the chronology of storms and surge storm to propose a much more historic approach of the coastal extreme events [
More than the mere reconstruction of series of events to the exclusive service of a more reliable modeling, the major stake in the interdisciplinary approach lies from now on in a better knowledge of the impacts to which the populations were exposed and the strength of the strategies which they were able to elaborate to survive. In this respect, the SREX report insists without ambiguity on the strategic character of this aspect of the climate change from now on. The systematic use of the terms of risk, exposure, vulnerability and sustainability is an obvious proof. It shows that the social dimension has become henceforth a strategic objective of the IPCC which concluded that we could not confine themselves only to mathematical projections of the climate which are often badly received by public opinion. Yet, the history of the climate can exactly enlighten the human reality of these extreme climate events of the past and serve as a tool of mediation between the scientific community and the citizens.
The archipelago of Mascarenes is situated in the southwest of Indian Ocean, east of Madagascar, between the 19th south parallel and the tropic of Capricorn (
Paradoxically, the bibliography dedicated to this risk in the region is very poor. Generally, the north part of Indian Ocean held the interest of the researchers more. The variation of the activity of the tropical cyclones in the South of Indian Ocean is today difficult to understand and only Chang-Hoi et al. tried to make it from a comparison with the El-Nino-Southern Oscillation and the oscillation of Madden-Julian Oscillation [
proach. They insist on the weakness of their results because of the absence of older data which would have allowed them to discern natural cycles in the decadal variations of intense cyclone activity.
The historic available data for the researchers interested in the tropical cyclones are extremely limited and very scattered [
The volume and the quality of the available archives for the South of Indian Ocean result directly from an original political history based on the major strategic interest that the Mascarene Islands represented for the British and French powers.
The archipelago of Mascareignes was known by Arabs from the 10th century but it is the Portuguese sailor Pedro de Mascarenhas who made it known in Europe in the first half of the 16th century. The first real colonization of the island begins in 1638 with the installation of the Dutch people. Struck by a very violent hurricane in February 1695, the colony was not able to recover and finally, the Governor decided to leave in 1706 by evacuating about 200 people. In 1715, the French replaced the Dutch until 1810, the year of the British conquest whose dominion did not end until 1968 [
Now under the exclusive dominion of the King of France, the archipelago was entrusted to the French East India Company to develop trade between the Kingdom and colonies overseas. From 1720, Reunion and Mauritius were organized settlements designed to produce mainly coffee and sugar for the metropolis. The economic system thus created was based on the use of slave labor from the Senegal Coastline, East Africa and Madagascar. Almost independent, the Company created a business empire consisting of counters in India (Chandernagore, Pondicherry, Mahe) in the Mascarene Islands, on the Persian Gulf, Burma and Indonesia. To ensure its dominance, the company got a government, an army and a navy controlled by a governor [
For convenience, we distinguish the pre-revolutionary period (before 1789) the contemporary period between 1789 and today. It is important to remember that the period after 1789 saw a significant political alternation between the monarchy (1815-1848) and the French Republic (1848-present).
Before 1789, the archives for studying hurricanes mainly concern the correspondence of Directors of the East India Company between 1700 and 1789. Of course, these sets of archives do not contain files specifically devoted to hurricanes and must therefore make very long and random analysis in this voluminous stock of archives. Primarily devoted to the management of maritime trade and the plantation economy, these records regularly mention extreme weather events and the main threat is hurricanes. In fact, the winds usually accompanied by heavy rainfall often have an impact on the fleet at anchor in the ports and on the plantations where they can cause the death of many slaves, destruction of crops and sugar refineries. Such damage had an immediate impact on the fragile economy of the islands and it is not uncommon that famine and disease followed after a hurricane. The examples below give an idea of the extent and nature of damage caused by these events.
Letter of the governor of the Ile-de-France (Mauritius) of the April 1st, 1718:
The hurricane was particularly violent. The harvest of coffee was almost lost. The hurricane provoked the filling of a river with pebbles pulled by rains and torrents. This filling transformed lands near the “river of Pebbles” into a desert.
Letter of the governor of the Ile-de-France (Mauritius) of March 8th, 1743:
We had a hurricane on March 8th. The big rashness of the wind lasted only from ten o’clock in the evening till two o’clock at night. Several vessels ran aground in the port because of very high waves which reached the store of the port. The harvest was almost completely destroyed, in particular the corn, the potatoes and the sugar canes. On the other hand, the rice and the manioc were protected. As soon as our port (Port Louis) will be repaired, I shall send to you by boat of the peas of the Cape (South Africa) and the beans which you can distribute in the poorest and to the blacks.
After 1789, the available material becomes even more precise about hurricanes and about their effects. On the British side, the archives of Colonial Office and of Secretary of State for the Colonies situated today in the national archives (Kew) supply extremely detailed reports on hurricanes having struck Mauritius fin the 19th and 20th centuries. In a rather systematic way, these documents give climatic information resulting from Meteorological Offices of the island. They concern the chronology and the meteorological parameters (temperature, pressure, winds) of the event. Then, the authors describe exactly the nature of the damage caused by the extreme event by enumerating buildings, trees, infrastructures as well as crops. At the same time, the cost of the damage is estimated because it justifies the measures of assistance taken by the government in London. These English archives focus on the consequences that cyclones can have on the Mauritius’s big source of wealth: the sugar production. The economic stakes explain the publication of numerous governmental reports and planters’ labor unions in the Mauritius’s agricultural Bulletin. The administrative archives can be completed by the colonial press of period, in particular The Mercury, The Brisbane Courrier and The Straits Times Weekly Issue. Besides meteorological and social data (deaths, destruction), newspapers get the first photos during the big hurricane of 1892.
For La Réunion, archives also become stronger with the development of the republican centralist model which is translated by the increase of the administrations. The services of the governor, the Conseil Général and the Farmers’ association guarantee the historian an excellent quality of the information. So from 1820 the archives of the government of the colony of La Réunion contain files specially dedicated to hurricanes. We find in particular the very precise statements of the colonial gendarmes (French military policemen) whose barracks were distributed throughout the whole island. They supply from now on a state of the disaster for every part of La Réunion, which facilitates the evaluation of the severity of the hurricane. From the point of view of the vulnerability of territories, the geographical precision of these reportsauthorizes a cartography of zones destroyed on the scale of a street or field. Finally, let us add inquiries made by the state employees of the forest administration about trees broken or uprooted by winds. This silvicultural information is a very precious resource which allows us to evaluate the severity of these historic events today even without information from meteorological instruments or also where events may have been totally underestimated by the various Meteorological Offices of Mascareignes (Météo-France and Mauritius Meteorological Services) whose catalogs of events begin in the first half of the 20th century.
The archives can therefore establish a longer time series than those currently offered by the meteorological services of the Indian Ocean that can’t consider exploring the historical archives. Historical material involves work that only professional climate historians can achieve due to their mastery of the archives, the historical method and technical knowledge in fields such as palaeography. However, the results obtained from the archives can only be useful to climatologists and meteorologists if the historian is able to translate his “social” data in more quantitative data. Indeed, archives supply information on the extreme events only according to the damage which they cause to societies and it is necessary to wait for 1850s to find finally data of instrumental nature (strength and orientation of winds, barometric pressure). And yet, nowadays, the meteorologists estimate the severity of hurricanes in order to compare them more easily according to their destructive power. To achieve this, they use the Simpson-Saffir hurricanes Wind Scale (SSHWS) which gives an estimation of the damage engendered by hurricanes. Set up in 1969 by Herbert Saffir, a consulting engineer, and Bob Simpson, Director of the National Hurricane Center, this scale provides examples of the types of damage caused by winds [
● Meteorological details;
● People, livestock;
● Infrastructure;
● Buildings (slave huts,colonial houses,barracks,stone churchs,stone stores and Governor’s Palace);
● Plantations;
● State of the sea;
● Ships;
● Landscape;
● Trees;
● Surge;
● Power and water;
● Social and economic consequences.
Thus organized, the “historic” SSHWS assigns to each event an index between 1 and 5. Nevertheless, the method has a certain limit when it comes to record events of lesser intensity between categories 1 and 3 of the scale. Indeed, the historical data available for the 17th and 18th centuries mainly provide social and economic information, that is to say information that provide information on the damage suffered by the island societies. The traces left by hurricanes in the archives thus mainly interested the most severe events that can be classified among categories 3 - 5 scale. Consequently, the approach taken in this work struggles to register extreme events located in the low or medium frequency severity before 1850. After this date, the instrumental quality archives (weather reports and instrumental data) significantly refines the interpretation and allows to better take into account the low-intensity hurricanes (category 1 - 3). In addition, sometimes a hurricane archive relate to a specific date without providing sufficient information to place on the scale. In this case, we have chosen to assign it an index −1, so it appears on the chronological chart but without estimation of its severity.
We have found 89 cyclones in the archives between 1656 and 2007 for the Mascarene archipelago. They show very strong fluctuations according to the century (
cords and the beginning of the European colonization of the region. For the subsequent period, the results show that the 18th century was more frequently affected by the extremes than the 19th century. However, the observation of the entire series clearly shows a rising trend during the 20th century, which displays a score of 43 cyclones, the little less than half of the total. The clear domination of the 20th century cannot be explained by a better recording of extremes in the 20th century than in the archives from the period 1700-1900.
Besides the fact of confirming the increase in the number of cyclones in the 20th century,
On the contrary, the
IPCC-SREX-report identifies small islands in Pacific, Indian and Atlantic as the areas most at risk of climate extremes. It considers that the main climate models give the same signal: the future risk increased. The report addresses the issue from a strategic perspective, since it speaks of the challenge of adapting and lists the vulnerabilities of these islands whose future development is directly threatened. However, it does not seem able to truly assess the particular risk to the Indian Ocean, for
lack of sufficient research. With the exception of the Maldives, the chapter “Case Studies” focuses instead on the Pacific and the Caribbean. Mark Pelling and Juha I. Uitto follow a more dynamic approach by questioning the factors that make these islands so vulnerable to natural disasters [
In recent years, under the influence of the social sciences the scientific community has been introduced to the key terms of vulnerability, exposure and resilience. The IPPC appropriated these terms and now employs them regularly. Their social significance is so strategic in the debate on global change it was thought necessary to define them in the IPCC-SREX-report. Fairly systematically used in environmental discourse, these terms are not necessarily well understood and defined by scientists and citizens. Indeed, the meaning of these words is different according to whether they are used by a researcher or climatologist, geographer, ecologist or economist. “Vulnerability” identified in the IPCC-SREX-report is thus presented as “the propensity or predisposition to be affected by a threat”, without any more precision than that. The definition is so vague as to make its use not necessarily valid based on the data available. However, the definition of adaptation is more accurate as it relates to environmental realities paradoxically, social and cultural might be corrupted. Given these uncertainties and the lexical content of particular historical archives, it is necessary to first undertake a semantic exercise in order to best match the objects mentioned in historical records (hurricane, storm, vulnerability) with the expectations of the current scientific community. This methodological precaution is a condition of dialogue between the disciplines involved in the debate on climate change and the necessary step to a lasting collaboration between the exact sciences and the social sciences.
In his book on the transition from a disaster in a risk society, the sociologist Ulrich Beck contrasts a pre-modern society described as “traditional”, to a “modern” society [
However, the reality apprehended in the archives about hurricanes strongly contradicts the idea of the total vulnerability of ancient societies. It reveals that the roots of the concept of risk can be found much further upstream. Dictionaries of the 17th and 18th centuries deliver a point of view much more pragmatic when they define risk as a “danger”, a “great peril” [
A research dedicated to the history of cyclones in the Mascarene Islands also helps to solve the question of the old meteorological terms. They illustrate remarkably well the evolution and dissemination of weather knowledge in the Indian Ocean and the assessment of hurricane risk by the authorities. From 1666 until about the 1850s the British and French governments routinely used the term “hurricane” to denote a very high winds causing significant human and material losses. The French regularly used the word “houragan”, spelled with an H. It disappears permanently in the archives after the First World War The first mention of French “cyclones” appears in 1868 in a report by the Governor who speaks about the center of a cyclone, a term borrowed from the British terminology. This loan can be explained by the proximity of Mauritius, which was British island since 1810. Indeed, the word cyclone was invented by the sea captain Anglo-Indian Henry Piddington (1797-1858) following an observation made on a ship offshore of Mauritius in February 1845. Noticing that the ship caught up in a meteorological event made a trajectory in a circle, he compared the phenomenon with a snake winding in circle and is inspired by the Greek word kyklos (circle) to call it “cyclone” [
Contrary to what one might think, it seems that hurricanes did not cause exceptional loss of life. In this regard, the archives remain unclear for the pre-revolutionary period (before 1800), while the following period provides some statistics. Generally, human losses from cyclones did not exceed fifty dead. However, this mortality rate had racial and social disparities. Unsurprisingly, the main victims were slaves working in the plantations or ports, while those located in cities were less vulnerable. After the abolition of slavery in Mauritius (British colony) in 1835, then in Reunion (French colony) in 1848, the inequality of the death rate became social. In addition to the black people, new Indian migrants (coolies) and Malagasy came to replace slaves in agriculture and “small white” (poor white people) were now the main victims of cyclones due to their precarious living conditions. Thus, the majority of them perished in the collapse of their homes or drowned because their neighborhoods were located in or near rivers and ravines that suddenly became disastrous torrents.
More than the cyclone itself it was its side effects that affected most people. In fact, by destroying or damaging crops and infrastructure, cyclones affected the operation of the island’s economy. In addition, the destruction of warehouses in ports or in the villages, threatened crop supplies and thus the food security of the population. The 1770s were particularly difficult for the people who underwent a series of cyclones which were level 5 on the SSHWS. However, in respect of La Réunion or Mauritius, the turning point was really in the years 1806-1808 when they suffered repeated and extremely violent hurricanes which destroyed practically all the coffee trees, clove trees and corn. During these three years, the price of corn rose sixfold because of the shortage which reigned in the Mascarene Islands. After the hurricane of 1832, the supply difficulties gave rise to a social protest against the French and British authorities in Reunion and Mauritius which were accused of incompetence and passivity. Reunion protesters stormed “out of the woods like wolves and subjected those to a colonial gale violent enough to send them join their destroyed cassava and bananas” [
Another side effect of cyclones, the health risk was a major concern of the authorities from the second half of the 19th century, as they feared the problems of water pollution because of the destruction of pipelines and wells. In 1913, outbreaks of typhoid occurred in several towns on the island of Reunion in the isolated mountains after the destruction of roads and bridges. In an attempt to contain the disease, military doctors were sent as a matter of urgency to these villages on horses and donkeys. On the spot, they treated and distributed some bleach to the populations.
The destruction caused by cyclones in the housing varied widely depending on the quality of the building. That is the reason why huts lived in by the slaves and the poor people, constructed of wood and roofed with straw or palm leaves, represented the majority of the damaged houses. Mostly, they are uncovered, overturned or sucked up by the cyclone and thrown far off. A traditional component of the architecture of islands even today, the more substantial colonial houses constructed of wood and covered with shingles were less vulnerable even if they regularly suffered damage.
Graver for the resilience of the island societies, the destruction or damage of public buildings were always felt as a profound trauma, in particular when it concerned churches, city halls, schools and high schools which are places of power and sociability. Often built stone from 1740, these buildings were the first to be reconstructed after a disaster with public money and donations.
Storm surges regularly caused floods and accumulation of pebbles and sand. In 1718, such an event led to the sealing of the estuary of the “River of Pebbles” (Réunion) and the agricultural devastation of part of the nearby coast. More systematically, cyclones disrupt agricultural production brutally and massively. Winds and floods which accompany them hit foodcrop production vital to the population such as corn, manioc, rice and potatoes. In fact, it is especially floodwaters which ravage fields by ripping up the crops or by causing them to rot. Nevertheless, these small family-run farms show themselves more resistant than the other more speculative commercial plantations of coffee and clove trees which, because of their size are more exposed to the wind. They decline more and more after the cyclone of 1844 for the benefit of the sugar cane, considered more resilient.
The violent winds of cyclones engender grave conesquences for the ships which navigate or which drop anchor in the ports of Port Louis and Saint-Denis. The strategic position of these islands for the British and the French until the 1850s added to the vulnerability because the total or partial destruction of the fleet could arouse an attack of the enemy. In 1771, the English council of Bengal indicates in a report that the French fleet of Port Louis underwent very heavy losses after the passage of a cyclone of category 5 on the SSHWS. Ships were effecttively very exposed and it could take less than one hour for them to be wrecked in the port which welcomes them. In 1823, the officers of the French navy looked on powerless at the wreck of nine ships on the beach of SaintDenis. The loss of ships from the fishing and trade fleets was also supplemented by the loss of rowboats and other small boats which were sent to the Rodrigue islands to gather the tortoises consumed on Mauritius and Reunion.
The major part of the damage caused to infrastructure was generally connected to the floods and to the torrents caused by the rains which accompany cyclones. Water cut roads and destroyed bridges provoking a break of the land communications and the isolation of populations for days, sometimes weeks or months. Roads and railroads were mostly taken by the flows of water and mud as in 1875 on Reunion where all the rivers of the island overflowed at the same time and interrupted the traffic between the capital Saint-Denis and the South of the colony. In the 19th century, the frequency of cyclones led to a deterioration in the situation. Roads barely had time to be repaired before they suffered new damage. The sugar industry was also very exposed to the floods and the wind. From its development in the 1820s, the mentions in the archives of the destruction of sugar refineries and their steam pumps are more and more frequent, and this served to weaken an economy more and more dependent on its sugar exports. Tidal waves also weakened infrastructure by damaging port facilities. Waves repeatedly destroyed the dikes and piers of the port of Barrachois on La Reunion. Finally, new factors of vulnerability appear from 1870 with the technical progress of the industrial revolution. It quickly becomes apparent that the new telegraphic and electric networks have little resilience. The official reports about cyclones speak from now on about overturned posts or about flooded power stations. This progress, which also gave rise to new weaknesses, contributed to aggravate the concern of the population which has become used to a new quality of life. In 1921, the storm caused the break of the submarine cables and interrupted the connections between Mauritius, Mozambique and France.
The terms of adaptation and resilience are anachronistic with regard to this historical research because they first appeared in the second half of the 20th century in the disciplines of the physics of materials and child psychiatry. In the 1970s, they were assimilated by the ecologists then by the climatologists only one decade ago. The IPCC-SREX-Report defines the latter as the ability of a system and its component parts to anticipate, absorb, accommodate, or recover from the effects of a hazardous event in a timely and efficient manner. Whereas adaptation corresponds in the glossary to the process of adjustment to moderate the negative effects of the climate or to take advantage of it. In these conditions, we can wonder about the relevance of such terms from a historical point of view. In reality, ancient societies were not content with passively suffering the negative effects of the climate and in the Mascarenes Islands, the populations learnt to live with cyclones very early on and actively tried to limit their dangers.
The historical testimonies evoke original behavior which is always usual by the inhabitants. In 1666, inhabitants take refuge in the nearby forests to shelter from the wind but also from the risk of surge. Others leave their houses on the coast and find shelter in the hills and mountains where they wait for the end of the extreme event. In 1771, the fishermen identify the risk of cyclone by observing the foam of the sea, the sky. They pull their dugouts and their boats far from the sea. Meanwhile, the owners strengthen their houses by attaching ropes to them and by nailing boards on doors and windows.
At the end of the 18th century, the inhabitants noticed that the colonial houses were particularly exposed to the damage and the widespread use of wooden shingles to roof their houses instead of palm leaves and straw began. The municipal authorities even published regulations from 1786 which made the use of this construction material compulsory, which also helped to limit fire risk in the city.
The series of disastrous cyclones of 1806 and 1807 plays a major role in the agricultural mutation of the Mauritius and La Réunion islands. After the cyclones of February and March, 1806 then those of 1807, planters and farmers gave up reconstituting the plantations of coffee and spices which were very badly damaged by winds and floods. They were largely replaced by the cultivation of sugar cane which was considered more resistant to the winds. The incidence of cyclones on the cultivation of the cane depends essentially on the rhythms of the plant. As a agronomist reminds us in 1884, the plant bears the storm well when it has only 6 to 8 months growth [