Background: Vacuum-assisted dressing is a noninvasive closure system of the wound, which makes localized and controlled negative pressure. Its mechanical tension reduces edema, stimulates granulation tissue formation and angiogenesis, and prepares the wound bed for closure. In this study, a patient has been presented, who suffered from serious lower extremity wounds due to arterial emboli, one of her wounds has been treated with vacuum-assisted dressing and the other with conventional dressing to evaluate the efficacy of vacuum-assisted dressing in acute ischemic wounds. Methods: A 65-year-old female patient was admitted to the emergency clinic, due to complaint of severe pain in her right lower extremity which suggested an acute arterial occlusion. She immediately underwent an embolectomy operation; however, a few days later, severe ischemia on the leg and foot became appearant. All of the necrosis was sharply debrided under sterile conditions in the operating room, and then lower leg wound was covered with vacuum-assisted dressing, also calcaneal wound was dressed with silver sulphadiazine. Results: Eighteen days after the first dressing with negative pressure, distal leg wound became ready for closure, whereas, enough granulation tissue over the calcaneal area developed merely thirty-four days later. Calcaneal wound closed spontaneously within fifty-three days. Conclusions: When dealing with this experience, using the negative pressure dressing in patient with severe lower limb wounds following arterial emboli, accelerates wound healing by means of developing the granulation tissue, and rapidly prepares the wound for closure, so it may reduce the risk of amputation.
Vacuum-assisted dressing is a noninvasive closure system which generates localized and controlled negative pressure by which the mechanical tension reduces edema, stimulates granulation tissue formation and angiogenesis, and prepares the wound bed for closure by means of delayed primary or secondary intervention. The system mainly consists of a polyurethane soft sponge, a fluidimpermeable plastic film and an adjustable vacuum pump which generates a controlled continuous or intermittent subatmospheric pressure [1-3].
Vacuum-assisted closure therapy is known as a useful tool to accelerate healing of not only acute, travmatic wounds, but also non-healing chronic wounds, allowing a faster recovery with minimal hospital stay. It has also been used widely in treatment of complex wounds such as pressure ulcers, long-term dehisced wounds, venous stasis ulcers, vascular and diabetic ulcers, gunshot wounds, postoperative sternal infections, mediastinitis and defects resulting from abdominal peritoneal resections and pelvic exenterations [4-11]. In diabetic patients, although there are numerous factors leading to tissue damage and foot ulcers which are very complex and difficult to treat, successful results have been obtained with the negative pressure dressing in many studies, suggesting that it can limit the progression of tissue necrosis with meticulous wound care and essential surgical procedures and may salvage the extremity from amputation [12,13]. However; severe lower limb wounds in patients with vascular disease and diabetes are usually associated with poor healing rates, leading to different levels of extremity amputations, and sometimes death.
Presented here is a diabetic patient who had been suffering from multiple acute ischemic lower extremity wounds, some of which has been treated with vacuum-assisted dressing and the others with conventional dressings to evaluate the efficacy of vacuum-assisted closure in acute ischemic wounds derived from vascular obliteration.
A 65-year-old female patient who had been suffering from deep and extensive necrosis in her right lower extremity, was referred to our clinic from vascular surgery department. She sustained diabetes mellitus for 15 years without having any complaints about her foot, and was ambulatory before the wounds developed. As she had coronary artery disease, she underwent a coroner by-pass surgery one year ago. When she was admitted to the emergency clinic, she was complaining from severe pain in her right lower extremity which was suggesting an acute arterial occlusion, after the evaluation of the clinical and radiologic findings, she immediately underwent an embolectomy operation in which the clot was removed and then arterial blood flow of the extremity obtained. However; a few days later, severe ischemia on the leg and foot was constituted, resulting in deep and extensive tissue necrosis involving lower leg, heel and around the ankle (
closure by means of skin grafting. After the sixth dressing with negative pressure in 18 days, sufficient granulation tissue formed, permitting the coverage of wound with skin graft. Calcaneal wound was followed with daily application of silver sulphadiazine cream and when necessary, extensive excision of necrotic tissues was made every 72 hours. While negative pressure dressing was in place, daily examination of closed wound was done for any signs of infection or any other local complications.
Eighteen days after the first dressing with negative pressure, distal leg wound was ready for closure with skin grafting, so leg and ankle wounds were covered completely using split-thickness mesh skin graft, whereas at this time calcaneal wound had significant necrosis, needing serial debridements and repeated dressings (
During the treatment, for improving her general condition, medical treatment including insulin injections, fluid replacement, intravenous antibiotics, and analgesics, was applied. Along 9 months follow-up no severe complication was observed. However, on a small area of the ankle, skin graft failed, requiring re-grafting (
Vacuum-assisted closure has provided an important treatment option in the management of many challenging wounds including pressure ulcers, long-term dehisced wounds, venous stasis ulcers, vascular and diabetic ulcers, since it was firstly utilized for chronic wounds as an alternative to conventional dressing. However, it has evolved rapidly into the treatment of acute wounds such as degloving injuries, war wounds, gunshot wounds, necrotising fasciitis, fasciotomy defects, postoperative sternal infections, contaminated wounds, and burns. Now, it is accepted as a useful tool to accelerate acute wound healing [4-11].
It has considerably changed the clinical approach to wound healing in diabetic foot ulcers, significantly reducing extremity amputations. In the treatment, foot wounds should be initially debrided for necrotic tissue completely and sufficient arterial inflow to the extremity should be accomplished with appropriate vascular procedures. Additionally, systemic antibiotics has to be given appropriately and meticulous wound care should be performed until a clean granulating bed becomes clearly appearant, which allows to cover the wounds sometimes involving bone and tendons, with skin grafts or flaps. Recently, Blume A. P. et al. presented a multicenter randomized controlled trial which enrolled 342 diabetic patients with foot ulcers to evaluate safety and clinical efficacy of negative pressure wound therapy compared with advanced moist wound therapy. In the result of the study, it has been emphasized that a significantly greater number of patients achieved complete ulcer closure and granulation tissue formation with the vacuum-assisted closure, and significant difference was not observed in ulcer-related complications such as infection, cellulitis, and osteomyelitis. Patients treated with conventional dressing had more than twice as many secondary amputations as those receiving negative pressure dressing [
Clare M. P., et al. reported their experiences with the vacuum assisted closure in 17 patients with non-healing wounds of the foot, ankle, and lower limb. Thirteen of them had diabetes mellitus, while eight had severe peripheral vascular disease. With the negative pressure dressing, wound care of the lower extremity in such wounds provided successful outcomes and revealed an acceptable alternative to the conventional dresssing [
Recently, Nordmyr J., et al. presented an investigation which included one hundred and twenty one wounds treated with vacuum assisted closure therapy in patients with lower limb arterial disease. Although critical lower limb ischemia was found in 87% of the patients, complete wound healing was achieved in 66% of the wounds. It is emphasised that vacuum-assisted therapy of complex wounds in the lower limbs in patients with vascular disease is associated with high healing rates [
Although there are a few studies on using negative pressure dressing in patients with lower limb wounds due to peripheral vascular diseases in the literature, any experience is not present about the wounds following acute arterial occlusion, namely arterial emboli. This may be the first presentation according to our knowledge. Moreover; corresponding studies between two or more wounds placed near anatomical locations in the same patient, which focus on the effect of negative pressure dressing on healing comparing with conventional dressings is not found. Based on the depths of the wounds and their locations, our presented wounds cannot be considered just identical, so the healing rates for each may be different a certain degree. Moreover, dysvascularity of the posterior heel area even without any ischemic events is also well known, resulting in challenges during wound healing. However, we believe that these can show effectivity and efficacy of the technique in a corresponding manner in the extremity having two wounds treated with both dressing modalities. When compared with calcaneal wound treated with conventional dressing, the time of healing with negative pressure dressing was at about one month earlier, which was significantly important in the protection of the extremity from infections and ongoing tissue necrosis being capable of resulting in serious damage to the extremity leading to either partial or complete amputation.
When dealing with this experience, using the negative pressure dressing in patient with severe lower limb wound due to arterial emboli accelerates wound healing by means of developing the granulation tissue, reduces the risk of amputation and prepares the wound rapidly for the closure with secondary intervention.
There are no conflict of interest statements. Neither of the authors have any financial interests, commercial associations, or other affiliations which may pose a conflict of interest to disclose. Furthermore, this paper was not supported by any external funding, nor were any special products, devices, or drugs used in the work presented.