Journal of Modern Physics
Vol.07 No.08(2016), Article ID:66221,11 pages
10.4236/jmp.2016.78077
Arguing on Entropic and Enthalpic First-Order Phase Transitions in Strongly Interacting Matter
F. Wunderlich1,2, R. Yaresko1,2, B. Kämpfer1,2
1Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institut für Strahlenphysik, Dresden, Germany
2Institut für Theoretische Physik, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany

Copyright © 2016 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/


Received 10 March 2016; accepted 26 April 2016; published 29 April 2016
ABSTRACT
The pattern of isentropes in the vicinity of a first-order phase transition is proposed as a key for a sub-classification. While the confinement-deconfinement transition, conjectured to set in beyond a critical end point in the QCD phase diagram, is often related to an entropic transition and the apparently settled gas-liquid transition in nuclear matter is an enthalphic transition, the conceivable local isentropes w.r.t. “incoming” or “outgoing” serve as another useful guide for discussing possible implications, both in the presumed hydrodynamical expansion stage of heavy-ion collisions and the core-collapse of supernova explosions. Examples, such as the quark-meson model and two-phase models, are shown to distinguish concisely the different transitions.
Keywords:
Entropic and Enthalpic Phase Transitions, Chiral Phase Transition, Isentropes, Quark-Meson Model, Linear Sigma Model with Linearized Fluctuations

1. Introduction
The beam energy scan at RHIC [1] - [7] is aimed at searching for a critical end point (CEP) in the phase diagram of strongly interacting matter, which is related to confinement-deconfinement effects. At a CEP [8] - [11] , a line of first-order phase transitions (FOPT) is conjectured to set in. Still, the hypothetical CEP could not (yet) be localized by ab initio QCD calculations. Therefore, details of the FOPT curve and details of the equation of state in its vicinity are unsettled to a large extent.
The utmost importance of the search for a CEP is also manifested by the fact that further ongoing relativistic heavy-ion collision experiments, such as NA61/SHINE [12] - [15] , have it on the their priority list, and planned experiments at FAIR, e.g. CBM [16] , at NICA, e.g. by the MPD group [17] , and at J-PARC, e.g. by the J-PARC heavy-ion collaboration [18] , are primarily motivated by it. The proceedings of the CPOD conferences [19] [20] document well the theoretical expectations and experimental achievements in this field.
The CEP itself (which may occur also as a tricritical point [21] ) is interesting, as it is expected to show up in specific fluctuation observables [22] - [27] , related to critical exponents, however, also the emerging FOPT curve can give rise to interesting physics phenomena. If the hypothetical FOPT curve continues to small or even zero temperatures, astrophysical consequences for neutron stars [28] - [41] proto-neutron star formation and core-collapse supernova explosions [33] [36] [42] - [44] are directly related to the physics of heavy-ion collisions, supposed the FOPT curve is accessible in such experiments (cf. [45] for searches for two-phase mixture effects related to the deconfinement FOPT).
From the theory side, the famous Columbia plot (cf. [21] for an update) unravels the following qualitative features: (i) At zero chemical potential, three-flavor QCD in the chiral limit displays a first-order confinement-
deconfinement transition which extends to non-zero strange-quark masses
and light-quark masses
; the delineation curve to the region
is related to a 2nd order transition with
symmetry, beyond which the transition turns into a cross over; for
and
, the 2nd order transition line is related to
symmetry. The physical point
is in the cross over region. (ii) For
and
, the phase structure in the temperature-chemical potential plane is determined by a 2nd order transition curve of presumably negative slope (with the above mentioned universal
scaling
properties) which ends in a tri-critical point, where the 1st order transition sets in, expected to continue to zero temperature. (iii) Upon enlarging
toward the physical values and keeping the conjectured
, the 2nd oder transition curve turns into the pseudo-critical (cross over) curve which ends at non-zero chemical potential in a CEP. The latter one can be thought to arise from the previous tri-critical point along a 2nd order
curve when enlarging
. Therefore, the expectation for 2 + 1 flavor QCD with physical quark masses
is the existence of a CEP at a temperature below the pseudo-critical temperature of 
zero chemical potential and an emerging 1st oder transition curve going to zero temperature [21] . Present day lattice QCD evaluations attempt to quantify these features, cf. [46] , for example.
In a recent series of papers [47] - [49] , the authors promote a useful sub-classification of FOPTs by attributing the confinement-deconfinement transition to an entropic one, while the established gas-liquid transition in nuclear matter [8] - [11] is classified as enthalpic one. The key is the Clausius-Clapeyron equation

which relates the slope of the critical pressure, 




Some guidance for the trajectories of fluid elements is given by the isentropic curves, determined by
Our note is organized as follows. In Section 2 we discuss obvious types of isentropic patterns which may accompany a FOPT in strongly interacting matter. The pattern classification is put in relation to the entropic and enthalpic sub-classes. We see enthalpic transitions either with incoming-only or incoming + outgoing isentropes, thus qualifying also the latter one for modeling the QCD deconfinement-confinement transition. Examples based on transparent models are presented in Section 3 and Appendix. In Section 4, we summarize.
2. Isentropic Patterns
We restrict our discussion to the grand canonical description of matter by an equation of state 
















We also recall from the equilibrium conditions



which is another form of the Clausius-Clapeyron Equation (1).
From selected examples we can infer three different patterns of isentropes in the T-m plane:
Type IA: Isentropes come in from the phase “2”, enter the critical curve 

Type IB: Isentropes come in from the phase “2”, enter the critical curve 

Type II: Isentropes come in from both sides, i.e. phases “1” and “2”, enter the critical curve 


Figure 1. Schematic representation of isentropes (lines with arrows indicating the expansion path) for the FOPT types IA (left panels,


The direction of isentropes is such to describe expansion, i.e. both temperature and density drop in pure phases. Type I is related to in-out (or going-through) isentropes, while type II has incoming-only. A prominent example for type II is the van der Waals equation of state, cf. [51] and Figure 1 in [52] . We emphasize the local character of our consideration, that is the restriction to the vicinity of a T-m point on the presumed phase boundary. These patterns translate directly into the T-n plane, see bottom row of Figure 1, where one verifies that dropping temperatures along isentropes in pure phases imply in fact dropping densities, too, i.e. proper
expansion. Types IA and IB are delineated by


We would like to emphasize that also models of type IA could serve as an illustration of the possible structure of the phase diagram, despite they belong to the gas-liquid transition type: Suppose


seems to speak against the scenario with an expanding and cooling fluid element initially in phase “2”, which traverses the confinement transition region (two-phase coexistence) and arrives in the hadronic world of phase “1”. That means, if “2” is a deconfined state, then both IA and IB allow for a graceful exit into the pure (hadronic) phase “1”, while II ends locally in a two-phase mixture of “1 + 2” for adiabatic expansion dynamics, i.e. some part of matter remains in the deconfined state “2”, e.g. as quark nuggets, contrary to our present expectations and in agreement with the failure of previous searches for them [53] - [57] , (see however [58] [59] for considering them as candidates of dark matter). Whether realistic models can be designed to do so (cf. [60] for a recent attempt), in agreement with serving for two-solar mass neutron stars, is a question beyond the schematic phenomenological approaches. Anyhow, type IA supplements the considerations favored in [48] [49] .
3. Examples
We are going to present a few examples for the above discussed transition types. For that, we select the quark-meson model1 (cf. [63] for a description of the setting used here2) with linearized meson field fluctuations3 and show that only shifting the nucleon/quark vacuum mass parameter 


value of the sigma field
nuclear matter properties at low temperatures and QCD thermodynamics at high temperatures, as discussed in [48] . But in view of the pertinent complexity of the QCD degrees of freedom in the strong coupling regime such a model with chiral symmetry breaking and restoration may give some glimpses of what is conceivable, in principle.
Also our model for the type IB (cf. Appendix) has, at best, illustrative character: It is a two-phase construction with states in “2” modeled by the extrapolation of weakly interacting quarks and gluons, supplemented by an effective bag constant to account for some non-perturbative aspects, and states in “1” referring to thermal light-meson (pion) excitations and nucleons in some mean field approximation including a realistic incompressibility modulus.
Figure 2 exhibits the isobars 
Figure 2. Contour plots of scaled pressure 











coordinates are 

and net quark density
Despite of the apparently marginal differences of the isobar patterns, the isentropes are drastically different. In the left bottom panel of Figure 2, type IA isentropes are seen which mean incoming from phase “2” and outgoing into phase “1” whenever they meet the critical curve. In contrast, the right bottom panel in Figure 2 displays a type II FOPT with incoming-only isentropes into the critical curve.
Figure 3 exhibits the isentropes in pure phases “2” and “1” over the T-n plane. This presentation verifies that both the temperature and the density drop along the isentropes in pure phases. One can infer directly from the bottom panels of Figure 2 the above claim w.r.t. outgoing isentropes from the low-density phase border curve


Figure 3. As Figure 2 but for the isentropes in the T-n plane for pure phases only. The difference in s/n between two adjacent isentropes is 0.2 and the thick blue isentropes are labeled with their respective s/n. The two-phase coexistence regions are depicted as green areas with the CEP (black bullet) on top. The dashed grey curves enclose the regions in T-m space displayed in Figure 2, i.e. the gray regions correspond to regions outside. The densities are scaled by the nuclear saturation density
Consistent to the Clausius-Clapeyron Equation (1), the critical pressure as a function of the temperature is increasing, see Figure 4. The inclined numbers at the top axis depict the (critical) chemical potential values
corresponding to the temperature given at the lower axis thus highlighting the shape of 
We mention that the employed minimum set-up of the quark-meson model does not allow for type IB transitions since thermal gluon fluctuations are not included, i.e. the number of effective degrees of freedom accounting for thermal fluctuations is too small. One may, however, easily construct two-phase models with a high-temperature quark-gluon phase and a low-temperature hadron phase. Figure 5 in the Appendix presents such an example. Without fine tuning, such models do not display a CEP at


The focus of the present note is on the isentropes relevant for the expansion dynamics in relativistic heavy-ion collisions. As emphasized, e.g. in [40] and references therein, analog considerations are useful for discussing the impact of peculiarities of the QCD phase diagram in core-collapse supernova explosions. There, one has to consider adiabatic paths along compression with proper leptonic contributions including also trapped neutrinos. For a first orientation, the pressure as a function of the energy density at suitable values of the entropy per baryon is to be analyzed to figure out whether the FOPT effects in iso-spin symmetric matter translate into modifications of neutron star configurations (with 
4. Conclusions and Summary
In summary we discuss options for modeling a hypothetical first-order phase transition which is related to a critical end point in a strongly interacting medium. Guided by the expectation that the QCD cross-over (as remnant of the transition of massless 2 + 1 flavor QCD, cf. [21] ) at a temperature of about 150 MeV at small chemical potential turns, at the critical point at large chemical potential, into a first-order transition we consider scenarios where initially deconfined matter can evolve completely into confined (hadronic) matter. We emphasize that both enthalpic and entropic phase transitions are consistent with such an expectation provided a
Figure 4. The critical pressure 

Figure 5. Isobars (left top panel) and the critical pressure 
graceful exit from the deconfined state into pure hadron matter is possible upon adiabatic expansion. At low temperature, the low density part of the two-phase coexistence region must be at larger densities than nuclear matter at saturation (for isospin symmetric nuclear matter). This implies that the pattern of isentropes must “go through” the phase border curve to be conform with the envisaged scenario. In contrast, the van der Waals type transition is of a different kind as it has locally incoming isentropes only. Obviously, more complicated phase border curves may allow for mixtures of the mentioned types. Our discussion also completely ignores flavor- locked color superconducting phases which are expected at larger densities.
Our discussion is based on equilibrium thermodynamics, and the medium is assumed to obey one conserved charge―the baryon density. Accounting for more conserved charges, e.g. related to isospin, strangeness, electric charge etc., complicates the picture. Transient states related to under saturated or over saturated gluons [75] or under saturated quark state occupation [76] give rise to many interesting phenomena beyond our discussion.
The lacking of ab intio information from first-principle calculations of QCD thermodynamics lets many options still be conceivable. This makes the concerted experimental hunt for signals of the critical end point and the related first-order transition so important.
Acknowledgements
We thank J. Randrup, V. Koch, F. Karsch, K. Redlich, M.I. Gorenstein, S. Schramm, H. Stöcker and B. Friman for enlightening discussions of phase transitions in nuclear matter. The work is supported by BMBF grant 05P12CRGH.
Cite this paper
F. Wunderlich,R. Yaresko,B. Kämpfer, (2016) Arguing on Entropic and Enthalpic First-Order Phase Transitions in Strongly Interacting Matter. Journal of Modern Physics,07,852-862. doi: 10.4236/jmp.2016.78077
References
- 1. Adare A., et al. (2012) Physical Review Letters, 109, Article ID: 152301.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.152301 - 2. Adare A., et al. (2012) Physical Review C, 86, Article ID: 064901.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.86.064901 - 3. Adamczyk, L., et al. (2013) Physical Review C, 88, Article ID: 014902.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.88.014902 - 4. Adamczyk, L., et al. (2014) Physical Review Letters, 113, Article ID: 052302.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.052302 - 5. Soltz, R.A. (2014) Nuclear Physics A, 931, 780.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2014.08.050 - 6. Das, S. (2015) EPJ Web of Conferences, 90, Article ID: 10003.
- 7. McDonald, D. (2015) EPJ Web of Conferences, 95, Article ID: 01009.
- 8. Rischke, D.H. (2004) Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics, 52, 197.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2003.09.002 - 9. Stephanov, M.A. (2004) Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplements, 153, 139.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1143/PTPS.153.139 - 10. Fukushima, K. and Hatsuda, T. (2011) Reports on Progress in Physics, 74, Article ID: 014001.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/74/1/014001 - 11. Friman, B., et al. (2011) Lecture Notes in Physics, 814, 1.
- 12. Gazdzicki, M. (2008) The European Physical Journal Special Topics, 155, 37-44.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2008-00587-0 - 13. Czopowicz, T. (2015) arXiv:1503.01619 [nucl-ex]
- 14. Aduszkiewicz, A., et al. (2015) arXiv:1510.00163 [hep-ex]
- 15. Mackowiak-Pawlowska, M. (2016) arXiv:1602.03682 [nucl-ex]
- 16. Chattopadhyay, S. (2014) Nuclear Physics A, 931, 267-276.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2014.09.099 - 17. Kekelidze, V., et al. (2015) EPJ Web of Conferences, 95, Article ID: 01014.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/20159501014 - 18. Sako, H. (2015) JPS Conference Proceedings, 8, Article ID: 022010.
- 19. (2013) Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Critical Point and Onset of Deconfinement (CPOD 2013), Napa, 1-15 March 12013.
- 20. (2015) Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Critical Point and Onset of Deconfinement (CPOD 2014), Bielefeld, 17-21 November 2014.
- 21. Ding, H.-T., Karsch, F. and Mukherjee, S. (2015) International Journal of Modern Physics E, 24, Article ID: 1530007.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0218301315300076 - 22. Stephanov, M.A., Rajagopal, K. and Shuryak, E.V. (1999) Physical Review D, 60, Article ID: 114028.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.60.114028 - 23. Gupta, S. (2009) Finding the Critical End Point of QCD: Lattice and Experiment. 5th International Workshop on Critical Point and Onset of Deconfinement, Long Island, 8-12 June 2009, 025.
- 24. Mohanty, B. (2009) Nuclear Physics A, 830, 899C-907C.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2009.10.132 - 25. Adamczyk, L., et al. (2014) Physical Review Letters, 112, Article ID: 032302.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.032302 - 26. Adamczyk, L., et al. (2014) Physical Review Letters, 113, Article ID: 092301.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.092301 - 27. Almasi, G.A., Friman, B. and Redlich, K. (2016). arXiv:1601.00782 [hep-ph]
- 28. K ämpfer, B. (1981) Physics Letters B, 101, 366-368. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(81)90065-4
K ämpfer, B. (1981) Journal of Physics A, 14, L471. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/14/11/009
K ämpfer, B. (1983) Journal of Physics G, 9, 1487.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0305-4616/9/12/009 K ämpfer, B. (1983) Astrophysics and Space Science, 93, 185-197.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02430922
K ämpfer, B. (1985) Physics Letters B, 153, 121-123.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(85)91410-8 - 29. Schertler, K., Greiner, C., Sahu, P.K. and Thoma, M.H. (1998) Nuclear Physics A, 637, 451-465.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9474(98)00330-3 - 30. Schertler, K., Leupold, S. and Schaffner-Bielich, J. (1999) Physical Review C, 60, Article ID: 025801.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.60.025801 - 31. Schertler, K., Greiner, C., Schaffner-Bielich, J. and Thoma, M.H. (2000) Nuclear Physics A, 677, 463-490.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9474(00)00305-5 - 32. Macher, J. and Schaffner-Bielich, J. (2005) European Journal of Physics, 26, 341.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/26/3/003 - 33. Dexheimer, V. and Schramm, S. (2008) Astrophysical Journal, 683, 943.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/589735 - 34. Pagliara, G., Hempel, M. and Schaffner-Bielich, J. (2009) Physical Review Letters, 103, Article ID: 171102.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.171102 - 35. Kurkela, A., Romatschke, P., Vuorinen, A. and Wu, B. (2010). arXiv:1006.4062 [astro-ph.HE]
- 36. Fischer, T., et al. (2011) The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 194, 39.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0067-0049/194/2/39 - 37. Alford, M.G., Han, S. and Prakash, M. (2013) Physical Review D, 88, Article ID: 083013.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.88.083013 - 38. Yasutake, N., et al. (2014) Physical Review C, 89, Article ID: 065803.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.89.065803 - 39. Zacchi, A., Stiele, R. and Schaffner-Bielich, J. (2015) Physical Review D, 92, Article ID: 045022.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.92.045022 - 40. Hempel, M., et al. (2015). arXiv:1511.06551 [nucl-th]
- 41. Alvarez-Castillo, D.E. and Blaschke, D. (2015) Supporting the Existence of the QCD Critical Point by Compact Star Observations. 9th International Workshop on Critical Point and Onset of Deconfinement, Bielefeld, 17-21 November 2014, 045.
- 42. Sagert, I., et al. (2009) Physical Review Letters, 102, Article ID: 081101.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.081101 - 43. Nishimura, N., et al. (2012) Astrophysical Journal, 758, 9.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/758/1/9 - 44. Pan, K.-C., Liebendrfer, M., Hempel, M. and Thielemann, F.-K. (2016) Astrophysical Journal, 817, 72.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/0004-637X/817/1/72 - 45. Bugaev, K.A., et al. (2014). arXiv:1412.0718 [nucl-th]
- 46. Bellwied, R., et al. (2015) Physics Letters B, 751, 559-564.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2015.11.011 - 47. Hempel, M., Dexheimer, V., Schramm, S. and Iosilevskiy, I. (2013) Physical Review C, 88, Article ID: 014906.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.88.014906 - 48. Steinheimer, J., Randrup, J. and Koch, V. (2014) Physical Review C, 89, Article ID: 034901.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.89.034901 - 49. Iosilevskiy, I. (2015). arXiv:1504.05850 [nucl-th]
- 50. Steinheimer, J., et al. (2008) Physical Review C, 77, Article ID: 034901.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.77.034901 - 51. Johnston, D.C. (2014). arXiv:1402.1205 [cond-mat.soft]
- 52. Yuen, A. and Barnard, J.J. (2015) Physical Review E, 92, Article ID: 062307.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.92.062307 - 53. Schaffner, J., Stoecker, H. and Greiner, C. (1991) Nuclear Physics B-Proceedings Supplements, 24, 246-250.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0920-5632(91)90331-8 - 54. Schaffner, J., Dover, C.B., Gal, A., Greiner, C. and Stoecker, H. (1993) Physical Review Letters, 71, 1328.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.1328 - 55. Abelev, B.I., et al. (2007) Physical Review C, 76, Article ID: 011901.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.76.011901 - 56. Madsen, J. (2008) Strangelets in Cosmic Rays. 11th Marcel Grossmann Meeting (MG11), Berlin, 23-29 July 2006, 0098.
- 57. Adriani, O., et al. (2015) Physical Review Letters, 115, Article ID: 111101.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.111101 - 58. Gorham, P. (2012) Physical Review D, 86, Article ID: 123005.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.86.123005 - 59. Atreya, A., Sarkar, A. and Srivastava, A.M. (2014) Physical Review D, 90, Article ID: 045010.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.90.045010 - 60. Benic, S., Mishustin, I. and Sasaki, C. (2015) Physical Review D, 91, Article ID: 125034.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.91.125034 - 61. Tetradis, N. (2003) Nuclear Physics A, 726, 93-119.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9474(03)01624-5 - 62. Pisarski, R.D. and Wilczek, F. (1984) Physical Review D, 29, 338(R).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.29.338 - 63. Wunderlich, F. and Kämpfer, B. (2015) Photon Emission Rates near the Critical Point in the Linear Sigma Model. 9th International Workshop on Critical Point and Onset of Deconfinement, Bielefeld, 17-21 November 2014, 027.
- 64. Tripolt, R.-A., Strodthoff, N., von Smekal, L. and Wambach, J. (2014) Physical Review D, 89, Article ID: 034010.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.89.034010 - 65. Mocsy, A., Mishustin, I. and Ellis, P. (2004) Physical Review C, 70, Article ID: 015204.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.70.015204 - 66. Bowman, E.S. and Kapusta, J.I. (2009) Physical Review C, 79, Article ID: 015202.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.79.015202 - 67. Ferroni, L., Koch, V. and Pinto, M.B. (2010) Physical Review C, 82, Article ID: 055205.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.82.055205 - 68. Steinheimer, J. and Randrup, J. (2012) Physical Review Letters, 109, Article ID: 212301.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.212301 - 69. Drago, A. and Pagliara, G. (2016) The European Physical Journal A, 52, 41.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2016-16041-2 - 70. Zdunik, J.L. and Haensel, P. (2013) Astronomy & Astrophysics, 551, Article No. A61.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201220697 - 71. Chamel, N., Haensel, P., Zdunik, J.L. and Fantina, A.F. (2013) International Journal of Modern Physics E, 22, Article ID: 1330018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S021830131330018X
- 72. Alvarez-Castillo, D.E. and Blaschke, D. (2015) Physics of Particles and Nuclei, 46, 846-848.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1134/S1063779615050032 - 73. Blaschke, D., Alvarez-Castillo, D.E. and Benic, S. (2013) Astrophysics Constraints on the EOS. 8th International Workshop on Critical Point and Onset of Decofinement, 11-15 March 2013, Napa, 063.
- 74. Benic, S., Blaschke, D., Alvarez-Castillo, D.E., Fischer, T. and Typel, S. (2015) Astronomy & Astrophysics, 577, Article No. A40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201425318
- 75. Peshier, A. and Giovannoni, D. (2016) Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 668, Article ID: 012076.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/668/1/012076 - 76. Stoecker, H., et al. (2016) Journal of Physics G, 43, Article ID: 015105.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/43/1/015105 - 77. Buchwald, G., Csernai, L.P., Maruhn, J.A., Greiner, W. and Stocker, H. (1981) Physical Review C, 24, 135.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.24.135 - 78. Kurkela, A. and Vuorinen, A. (2016). arXiv:1603.00750 [hep-ph]
Appendix
A two-phase model for type IB
The constructed FOPT is based on the extrapolation of a hadron equation of state with pressure

to be calculated from

with

The temperature 

and the baryo-chemical potential is then



saturation density

where we employ for the number of effective quark degrees of freedom 





NOTES
1We chose this since in the chiral limit it obeys the same symmetries (an 
2In a nutshell, the employed model, also coined linear sigma model, is based on a doublett of quark degrees of freedom, an iso-scalar sigma field and an iso-triplett pion field with standard coupling among these fields.
3According to our experience with numerical evaluations, the account of linearized meson field fluctuations modifies significantly the results of the mean field approximation. (For the inclusion of the complete fluctuations spectrum within the functional renormalization group approach, see [64] .) In particular, the fluctuating meson degrees of freedom deliver explicit contributions to the pressure.
4This is a model in the spirit of [77] for nuclear matter and pions.












