E. Zohav et al. / Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1 (2011) 238-241
Copyright © 2011 SciRes.
241
OJOG
and infertile women. Human Reproduction, 12, 1372-
1376.
[5] Stampe Sorensen, S. (1988) Estimated prevalence of Mu-
llerian duct anomalies. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica
Scandinavica, 67, 441-445.
doi:10.3109/00016348809004257
[6] Stray-Pedersen, B. and Stray-Pedersen, S. (1984) Etio-
logic factors and subsequent reproductive performance in
195 couples with a prior history of habitual abortion.
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 148,
140-146.
[7] Raga, F., Bauset, C., Remoh’I, J., Bonilla-Musoles, F.,
Simon, C. and Pellicer, A. (1997) Reproductive impact of
congenital Mullerian anomalies. Human Reproduction,
12, 2277-2281. doi:10.1093/humrep/12.10.2277
[8] Makino, T., Hara, T., Oka, C., Toyoshima, K., Sugi, T.,
Iwasaki, K., Umeuchi, M. and Iizuka, R. (1992) Survey
of 1120 Japanese women with a history of recurrent sp-
ontaneous abortions. European Journal of Obstetrics and
Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 44, 123-130.
doi:10.1016/0028-2243(92)90057-6
[9] Clifford, K., Rai, R., Watson, H. and Reagan, L. (1994)
An informative protocol for the investigation of recurrent
miscarriage: Preliminary experience of 500 consecutive
cases. Human Reproduction, 9, 1328-1332.
[10] Tur-Kaspa, I., Gal, M., Hartman, M., Hartman, J. and
Hartman, A. (2006) A prospective evaluation of uterine
abnormalities by saline infusion sonography (SIS) in
1009 women with infertility or abnormal uterine bleeding.
Fertility and Sterility, 86, 1731-1735.
doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.05.044
[11] Reute, K.L., Daly, D.C. and Cohen, S.M. (1989) Septate
versus bicornuate uteri: Errors in imaging diagnosis. Ra-
diology, 172, 749-752.
[12] Steiner, H., Staudach, A., Spitzer, D. and Schaffer, H.
(1994) Three-dimensional ultrasound in obstetrics and
gynecology: Technique, possibilities and limitations. Hu-
man Reproduction, 9, 1773-1778.
[13] Jurkovic, D., Giepel, A., Gruboeck, K., Jauniaux, E., Na-
tucci, M. and Campbell, S. (1995) Three-dimensional ul-
trasound for the assessment of uterine anatomy and de-
tection of congenital anomalies: A comparison with hys-
terosalphingography and two dimensional sonography.
Ultrasound Obstetrics Gynecology, 5, 233-237.
doi:10.1046/j.1469-0705.1995.05040233.x
[14] Raga, F., Bonilla-Musoles, F., Blanes, J. and Osborne,
N.G. (1996) Congenital mullerian anomalies: Diagnostic
accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasound. Fertility and
Sterility, 65, 523-528.
[15] Nicolini, U., Bellotti, M., Bonazzi, B., Zamberletti, D.
and Candiani, G.B. (1987) Can ultrasound be used to
screen uterine malformations? Fertility and Sterility, 47,
89-93.
[16] Caliskan, E., Ozkan, S., Cakiroglu, Y., Sarisoy, H.T.,
Corakci, A. and Ozeren, S. (2010) Diagnostic accuracy
of real-time 3D sonography in the diagnosis of con-
genital Mullerian anomalies in high-risk patients with
respect to the phase of the menstrual cycle. Journal of
Clinical Ultrasound, 38, 123-127.
[17] Pellerito, M.S., McCarthy, S.M., Doyle, M.B., Glickman,
M.G. and DeCherney, A.H. (1992) Diagnosis of uterine
anomalies: Relative accuracy of MR imaging, endova-
ginal sonography and hysterosalpingography. Radiology,
183, 795-800.
[18] Fedelee, L., Dorta, M., Brioschi, D., Massari, C. and
Candiani, G.B. (1989) Magnetic resonance evaluation of
double uteri. Obstetrics Gynecology, 74, 844-847.
[19] Wu, M.H., Hsu, C.C. and Huang, K.E. (1997) Detection
of congenital mullerian duct anomalies using
three-dimensional ultrasound. Journal of Clinical Ultra-
sound, 25, 487-492.
doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0096(199711/12)25:9<487::AID
-JCU4>3.0.CO;2-J
[20] Mohamed, M., Momtaz, M.D., Alaa, N., Ebrashy, M.D.,
Ayman, A. and Marzouk, M.D. (2007) Three-dimensi-
onal ultrasonography in the evaluation of the uterine cav-
ity. MEFS Journal, 12, 41-46.
[21] Ghi, T., Casadio, P., Kuleva, M., Perrone, A.M., Savelli,
L., Gianchi, S., Pelusi, C. and Pelusi, G. (2009) Acc-
uracy of three-dimensional ultrasound in diagnosis and
cla-ssification of congenital uterine anomalies. Fertility
and Sterility, 92, 808-813.
doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.05.086
[22] Alc’azar, J.L. (2005) Three-dimensional ultrasound in
gynecology: Current status and future perspectives. Cu-
rr ent Women’s Health Review, 1, 1-14.
doi:10.2174/1573404052950221
[23] Whitehouse, G.H. and Wright, C.H. (1992) Imaging in
gynaecology. In: Grainger, R. G., and Allison, D. J., Eds.,
Diagnostic Radiology, 1825-1853.
[24] Sorensen, S.S. (1987) Hysteroscopic evaluation and en-
docrinological aspects of women with mullerian anom-
alies and oligomenorrhea. International Journal of Fe-
rtility, 32, 445-452.
[25] Bermejo, C., Martínez Ten, P., Cantarero, R., Diaz, D.,
Pérez Pedregosa, J., Barrón, E., Labrador, E. and Ruiz
López, L. (2010) Three-dimensional ultrasound in the
diagnosis of Müllerian duct anomalies and concordance
with magnetic resonance imaging. Ultrasound Obstetrics
Gynecology, 35, 593-601. doi:10.1002/uog.7551