Applied Mathematics, 2011, 2, 1263-1269
doi:10.4236/am.2011.210176 Published Online October 2011 (http://www.SciRP.org/journal/am)
Copyright © 2011 SciRes. AM
The Maximum Size of an Edge Cut and Graph
Homomorphisms
Suohai Fan1, Hongjian Lai2, Ju Zhou3
1Department of Mat hem at i cs, JiNan University, Guangzhou, China
2Department of Mat hem at i cs, West Virginia University, Morgantown, USA
3Department of Mat hem at i cs, Kutztown University, Kutztown, USA
E-mail: zhou@kutztown.edu
Received November 2, 2010; revised July 5, 2011; accepted July 12, 2011
Abstract
For a graph G, let
max: is an edge cut of bGD DG. For graphs G and H, a map

:VG VH
is a graph homomorphism if for each
euvEG ,
uvEH

. In 1979, Erdös proved by prob-
abilistic methods that for p 2 with



11
if0mod2,
22 2
11
if1mod2,
22
p
p
fp
p
p


if there is a graph homomorphism from G onto then ,
p
K
.bGfp EG In this paper, we obtained
the best possible lower bounds of for
graphs G with a graph homomorphism onto a Kneser graph or a
circulant graph and we characterized the graphs G reaching the lower bounds when G is an edge maximal
graph with a graph homomorphism onto a complete graph, or onto an odd cycle.

bG
Keywords: Maximum Edge Cuts, Graph Homomorphisms
1. Introduction
In this paper, the graphs we consider are finite, simple
and connected. Undefined notation and terminology will
follow those in [1]. Let G be a graph. For disjoint non-
empty subsets

,
X
YVG, let
,
X
Y denote the set
of edges of G with one end in X and the other end in Y.
For a subset , let

SVG

SVG\.S An edge cut
of G is an edge subset of the form ,SS
G
for some
nonempty proper subset . Define
SV


t of GmaxbG:is an edgeD D cu.
For graphs G and H, a map

:VG VH
is a
graph homomorphism if for each
Geuv E ,
. If there is a graph homomorphism
from to
 
uvEH

G
H
, then is called H-colorable. Sup-
pose that is H-colorable. Then every graph homo-
morphism also induces a map
If for any graph homomorphism
G
V
G
:VG
 
:
eEG EH
 
H
.
:VG VH
, and for any 1, e
2
eEH, we
always have

11
21
ee


ee
, then G is called
edge-uniformly H-colorable.
Throughout this paper, we use Kp to denote the com-
plete graph with p vertices and 21
p
C to denote an odd
cycle with
21p21 ,
pi
VCvi Z and
,.v v
11iii
Nv 
Theorem 1.1 (Erdös [2]) Let p 2 be an integer and



mod 2,
mod 2.
11if 0
22 2
11 if 1
22
p
p
fp
p
p


If there is a graph homomorphism from G onto Kp,
then
.bGfpEG
Let p and q be two positive integers with p 2q. The
Kneser graph :
p
q
is the graph whose vertices repre-
1264
S. H. FAN ET AL.
sent the q-subsets of where two vertices
are connected if and only if they correspond to disjoint
subsets.
0,1,,1 ,p
p q
Theorem 1.2 Let , be two positive integers
with p 2q. If there is a graph homomorphism from G
onto :
p
q
K
, then
 
2.
q
bG EG
p
Let p and q be two positive integers with p 2q. The
circulant graph /
p
q
K
is the graph with vertex set
and the neighbors of vertex v
are

0,1, 2,VG
vq
vq v p
, 1
p
,1,
.

,pq
q
Theorem 1.3 Let , be two positive integers
with p 2q. If there is a graph homomorphism from G
onto /
p
q
K
, then
 
2.
q
bG EG
p
Theorem 1.4 Let , be two positive integers
with p 2q and let
p q
 

22
22
44 ifis even,
221
,441
ifis odd.
221
pqq p
pp q
fpq pqq p
pp q




If G is an edge-uniformly /
p
q
K
-colorable, then

,.bGfpqEG
A graph G is edge-maximal H-colorable if G is
H-colorable but for any graph such that GG
con-
tains G as a spanning subgraph with

EG EG
,
G is not H-colorable.
In Section 2, we prove an associate Theorem which
will be used in the proofs of other theorems. In Subsec-
tion 3.1, we give an alternative proof of Theorem 1.1 and
characterize the graphs G reaching the lower bound in
Theorem 1.1 when G is edge-maximal Kp-colorable. In
Subsection 3.2, we show the validity and sharpness of
Theorem 1.2. In Subsection 3.3, we show the validity of
Theorem 1.3 and Theorem 1.4 and characterize the
graphs G reaching the lower bound in Theorem 1.4 when
G is edge-maximal /
p
q
K
-colorable. In Subsection 3.5,
we show a best possible lower bound for when
G
has a graph homomorphism onto an odd cycle 21

bG
p
C
and characterize the graphs reaching the lower bound
among all edge-maximal 21
p
C
-colorable graphs. There
are a lot of researches about graph homomorphism can
be found in [3-7].
2. An Associate Theorem
In this section, we shall prove an associate Theorem
which will be used in the proofs of other theorems.
Throughout this section, we assume that G and H are two
graphs and
is an onto graph homomorphism from G
to H. Note that we can also view
as a map from
EG to
EH such that for each
euvEG ,
euvEH

SX

.
Lemma 2.1 Let g be a function between sets X and Y.
Then
1) For any ,

11
SgSg

.
2) For any sets and , if and
only if
CYDYCD
11
.
g
CgD

Lemma 2.2 If ,
D
SS
is an edge cut of H, then
11
,DS

1
S
is an edge cut of G. Con-
sequently,

111
,.DSS


Proof. For each
1
x
S
,

1
y
S with
x
yEG
, by the definition of inverse image,
x
S
,
and
y
S
. Hence,

x
yxy

D, and so
1
x
y
D
. It follows that
 
111
,DSS



1
 .
Conversely, for each

x
yD
,
,
x
yx
yDSS


. We may assume that
x
S
and
y
S
. Then

1
x
S
and
S
1
y
. This proves
 
111
,DSS



.
Therefore,
 
111
,DS


S
is an edge cut of
G. By Lemma 2.1 1),
 
111
,.DSS




Lemma 2.3 Suppose that is an
edge cut cover of H. Then

12
,,,
k
DD D

1
12
,,,
k
DD D
11


l
is an edge cut
cover of G. Moreover, if an edge e of H lies in exactly
members of , then every edge in
1e
lies in
exactly l
members of
.
Proof. By the definition of graph homomorphism, for
each
, ex GyE

x
yxyEH

. Since
is an edge cut cover of H, then
i
x
yx
y

D
for some i. It follows
that
D
1,
i
x
y
D and so is an edge cut cover of
G. By Lemma 2.1 2), i
e if and only if
D
1
i
1
eD
l, and so if an edge e of H lies in ex-
actly
members of , then every edge of
1e
lies in exactly l
members of .
Let k, l be two positive integers. A k-edge cut at least
l-cover of a graph H is a collection
of k edge cuts of H such that every edge of H lies in at
least l members of . A k-edge cut l-cover of a graph
H is a collection

12
,,,
k
DD D
,
k
D
12 of k edge cuts of
H such that every edge of H lies in exactly l members of
. A k-edge cut average l-cover of a graph H is a col-
lection
,,DD
12 ,
k
D,,DD

H
of edge cuts of H such that
1
k
i
i
DE and

1i
iDlEH
k.
Lemma 2.4 Suppose that
is an onto graph homo-
morphism from G to H and is a k

12
,,,
k
DD D

edge cut cover of H such that
1
k
1i
i
D
lE
G
.
Copyright © 2011 SciRes. AM
S. H. FAN ET AL.
1265
Then
 
.
l
bG EG
k
Proof. By Lemma 2,
 


11 1
12
,,,
k
DD D
 
 
is an edge cut cover of G and for any edge e of H, if e
lies in exactly -members of , then every edge of
lies in exactly members of . Therefore,
l

1e
l 
 
l
bG EG
k
follows from



1
1.
k
i
i
lEGD kbG

Theorem 2.5 If one of the following is true, then
 
.
l
bG EG
k
1) There is a graph homomorphism from G onto H and
H has a k-edge cut l-cover.
2) There is a graph homomorphism from G onto H and
H has a k-edge cut at least l-cover.
3) G is edge-uniformly H-colorable and H has a
k-edge cut average l-cover.
3. Main Results
3.1. Graphs with a Graph Homomorphism onto
a Complete Graph
In this section, we present an alternative proof for Theo-
rem 1.1 and determine all graphs G reaching the lower
bound in Theorem 1.1 when G is edge-maximal
Kp-colorable.
Lemma 3.1 Let p 2 be an integer and let
2
p
p





,
22
2
pp
k
lp






. Then the graph Kp has a k-edge cut
l-cover.
Proof. Let

,:is 2
\
pp
XV KXX





a-subset
of Then is an edge cut cover of Kp with

.
p
VK
.k


2
p
p








Since every \, p
XV KX

has size

\X,pp
XV K




22
p



, and since

,
2
p
p
EK 


every edge of Kp must be in exactly
22
2
pp
k
l
p






members of .
Thus, Theorem 1.3 follows from Theorem 2.5 1) and
Lemma 3.1.
The lower bound of Theorem 1.1 is best possible, in
the sense that there exists a family of graphs such that the
lower bound of Theorem 1.1 is reached.
Let G and H be two graphs. The composition of G and
H, denoted by
GH, is the graph obtained from G by
replacing each vertex of by Hi, a copy of H,
and joining every vertex in Hk to every vertex in Hl if

iGvV
.
kl
vvE G
Theorem 3.2 Suppose that there is an onto graph ho-
momorphism from G to Kp and G is edge maximal
Kp-colorable.
Then each of the following holds.
1)
,bGfp EG where equality holds only if
G is edge-uniformly Kp-colorable.
2) Among all edge-maximal Kp-colorable graph G,
bGfpEG if and only if .
ps
GKK


Proof. 1) By Theorem 1.1,
 
bGfpEG. Sup-
pose that
bG . Let fp EG
:p
VG VK
be an arbitrarily given graph homomorphism and let
12
,,,
p
p
VKvvv be labelled such that if
1
i
V
i
v, then 12 .
p
VV V For any subset
,
p
XVK let
\
p
YVK X and let
also de-
note the induced map Then

EG

:.
p
EK
11
ii
ii
vX vX
X
vV




and
\YVG X


11
. Since G is an edge-maximal
Kp-colorable,
 

111
,,
p
KVG
X Y




XY is
a complete bipartite graph. There are
2
p
kp








parti-
tions of
p
VK into two parts

,,1,2,,
ii ,
X
Yi k
such that 01
ii
YX
. Set
,DXY
iii
. Label
them so that

11 1
12 .
k
DD D

 
 By
Lemma 2.2 and Lemma 2.3 and the assumption that
,bGfp EG
 

1k
lEG bGD
k
 and
so

 

11
1
k
ki
i
l
kEGkDD lEG
k


 
,
Copyright © 2011 SciRes. AM
1266 S. H. FAN ET AL.
where 22
2
pp
k
lp






. Therefore all the inequalities are
equalities and so
 
11 1
12 .
k
DD D
 
 

Let 12 1
2
1,,,,p
ii i
Xvvvv






p
vX with
, Y

\
p
VK X
and
,DXY

. Let
1
\
p
X
Xvv
 
,
and

p
YVK
 \X

,
 .YDX Then

1D

1D
. Since

11
2
11
2
111
1
1
p
p
ii
pii
DXY
VV V
VKV VV























and
 

11
2
11
2
111
,
p
p
pi i
ppi i
DXY
VV V
VKV VV








 












it follows from
 
11
D



D
that 1
p
VV,
and so 12 p
VV Vs for some positive inte-
ger s, which implies G is edge uniformly Kp-colorable.
2) Suppose that G is an edge-maximal Kp-colorable
graph such that
 
.bGfpEG By the proof of
1), there is some positive integer s such that
s
p
GK
K


Conversely, suppose that
s
p
GK
K


. By Theorem
1.1,



.
pp
s
KbKsfp K

It remains to show
that for any partition
,
X
Y of

s
p
KKV

,

,.
ps
XYp KKf

Let 12
,, ,
p
VV V denote the partition of
s
p
KKV
such that for is an independent set of
1, 2i,, ,p
i
V
s
p
K
K
. Let
,
X
Y be an edge cut of
p
K
s such
that 1)
,
X
Y is maximized and subject to 1), 2)

:
ii
iXY0 is minimized, where ii
X
XV and
i
YYVi
. Then we have the following claims:
Claim 1. For each i, ,
1ip 0.
ii
XY
Otherwise, there is i such that 0.
ii
XY Let
i
mX X and i
tYY, If m = t, let i
X
XY
and \i
YYY
Then
,
X
Y
is an edge cut of
s
p
K
K
such that
,,
X
YXY
and
:0:0
iiii
iXY iXY
 1,

contrary to the
choice of
,
X
Y. Then . Without less of general-
ity, we may assume
mt
tm
. Let i
X
XY
and
.\ i
YYY
Then
,
X
Y

is an edge cut of
s
p
K
K
such that

X
,, ,
i,YXYtmYXY
 con-
trary to the choice of
X
Y. ,
Claim 2.

::
ii
iVXiV Y1.
Otherwise,

::
ii
iVXiV Y2. Choose
and set
i
VX\i
X
XV
and . Then
i
YYV
,
X
Y
is an edge cut such that


2
,,:: 1
,,
ii
X
YXYiVXiVY
XY


m
contrary to the choice of
,
X
Y.
By Claim 1 and Claim 2, we have

22
,4
ps
XY
when p is even and


22
1
,4
ps
XY
when p is odd,
that is,


,.
ps
KXYfp EK

3.2. Graphs with a Graph Homomorphism onto
a Kneser Graph
In this section, we shall show the validity and sharpness
of Theorem 1.2.
Theorem 3.3 Let p and q be two positive integers with
p 2q. Then :
p
q
K
has a p-edge cut 2q-cover.
Proof. For 0,1, ,1ip
, let
0,1, 2,,1:and
i
VXp XqiX  and
,
lii
DVV.
Then 1.
1
i
p
Vq


By the definition of
:
p
q
, is an independent sets of
i
V:
p
q
K
and is an
edge cut of size
i
D
1
1
pp
qq
q



. Then
01 1
,,,
p
DD D
is an edge cut cover of :
p
q
.
Since :
p
q
K
has vertices and each of them is of
degree
p
q



pq
q



,

:.
2
pq
ppq
qq
EK



Since each edge of :
p
q
K
is contained in
Copyright © 2011 SciRes. AM
S. H. FAN ET AL.
1267
1
12
2
ppq
p
qq q
ppq
qq

 

 
 



edges cuts, q:p
K
has a p-edge
cut 2q-cover.
Proof of Theorem 1.2 Theorem 1.2 follows from
Theorem 2.5 and Theorem 3.3.
Theorem 3.4 (Poljak and Tuza, Theorem 2 in [8]). If
p 3q, then the maximum edge cut of :pq
K
is induced
by the maximum independent set of :pq
K
and is of size
1.
1
pp
qq




q
Theorem 3.5 The bound in Theorem 1.2 is best possible.
Proof. By Theorem 3.4, the edge cuts we choose in
the proof of Theorem 4.1 are the maximum edge cuts of
:pq
K
when p 3q. Therefore, the bound in Theorem 1.2
is reached by :pq
K
when p 3q.
3.3. Graphs with a Graph Homomorphism onto
a Circulant Graph
In this section, we verify the validity and sharpness of
Theorem 1.3 and Theorem 1.4.
Theorem 3.6 Let p and q be two positive integers with
p 2q. Then the following hold.
1) /
p
q
K
has a p-edge cut at least 2q-cover.
2) /
p
q
K
has a p-edge cut average


21
22
121
ppqq
pq







 -cover.
Proof. For , let 0,1,,1ip
,1,,1
2
ip
Vii







and let ,
iii
DVV
. Then
is an edge cut cover of
01 1
,,,
p
DD D
/
p
q
with

1.
22
ipp
Dq



q
1) Notice that for any edge /
p
q
euvK
,,,DDD
, e lies in at
least 2q members of , then
/
01 1
p
p
q
K
has a p-edge cut at least 2q-cover.
2) Since


121
2
p
q
pp q
EK
 



,




0
/
1
22
21
22
121
p
i
i
pq
pp
Dqqp
ppqq
EK
pq














 
and so /
p
q
K
has a p-edge cut average


21
22
121
ppqq
pq







 -cover.
Proof of Theorem 1.3 Theorem 1.3 follows from
Theorem 2.5 and Theorem 3.6 1).
Proof of Theorem 1.4 Theorem 1.4 follows from
Theorem 2.5 and Theorem 3.6 2).
Theorem 3.7 Let be an edge-maximal graph such
that is edge uniformly
G
G/
p
q
K
-colorable. Then
/
s
pq
K
GK
and

,.bGfpq EG
Proof. Suppose that G is an edge-maximal graph such
that G is edge-uniformly /
p
q
K
-colorable. Then,
/
s
pq
K
GK
for some positive integer s. By Theorem
1.4, we have


//
,
s
qs
pp
bKf pKKqEK


q
.
Now we prove that

//
,
s
qs
pp
bKf pKKqEK


q
.
For
0,1, ,1
/
p
q
ipVK, let
1
i
Vhi
, where
/
:
p
q
G VKhV is an onto graph homomorphism
from G to /
p
q
K
such that for any edge xy of G,
qhxhy pq

. By the definition of graph
homomorphism, is an independent set. Let
i
V
,
X
Y
be an edge cut of /
s
pq
K
K
such that 1)
,
X
Y is
maximized and subject to 1), 2)

:0
ii
iXY is mi-
nimized, where ii
X
XV
and .
ii
YYV
Claim 1. For each i, 0
ii
XY .
Proof. Otherwise, there is i such that 0
ii
XY
.
Since for each i
vV
i
, either

ii
NvX Nv Y
or
ii
NvXNvY
. If the former is true, then
\, ,
ii
X
XY XXY, contradicting the choice of
X
,Y; if the latter is true, then
,\ ,
ii
X
YY YXY,
contradicting the choice of
,
X
Y.
Assume that 1
m
j
i
ij
X
V
and 2
,,,
m
jj J
let

1
j
.
2
p
J
. Without loss of generality, we can assume that
Let
p
C be the cycle with vertex set
/
0,1,, 12,
p
q
pVK , where i is adjacent to j if
and only if
p. Let

p
C
distJ be the 1ij mo d
hortest path of length of the s
p
C which contains all the
elements in J. Then
1.
C
distJ
Claim 1.
m
1
C
dist Jm.
ppose, tot
Proof. Suar the contr
1
p
C
dist Jmy, tha.
Let P be a path of
p
C which contains all the elements
Copyright © 2011 SciRes. AM
S. H. FAN ET AL.
1268
in endpoints of PJ and assume that 1
j, m
j are the.
Then there is
\.kV J Let



\m
P
j
m
X
XV V
and


\.
m
J
Jj m
T hen

pp
CC
Jdist J
dist
and ,,
X
XX rad
Cl
X



, a contiction.
aim 2. .
2
p
m


Proof. Suppose, to the cory, that ntra.
2
p
m


Let P
be a path of
p
C which contains all the J
d assume that 1
j, m
j are the endpoiP. Let
elements in
an nts of


1\
mp
jVC P
be such that
V
1mm p
jj EC
. Let

1m
XXV
and

1m
JJ j
. Then
 
1p


and
2

CC
dist Jdist J
,,
X
XXX
,



a contradiction.
By the above discussion, wean calculate that c

 

//
raph
,
pq
pq EKs .
pq ss
bK fKK


3.4. Graphs with a Graph Homomorphism onto
an Odd Cycle
for s a g homomorphism onto an
dd
In this section, we will show a best possible lower bound

bG when G ha
o cycle 21
p
C and ch the graphs reaching aracterize
the lower bound among all edge-maximal
21
p
Corable graphs.
Theorem Suppose that there is an onto graph ho-
momorphism from G to 21
-col 3.8
p
C
. Then each of the fol-
lowing holds.
1)
 
2,
21
p
bG EG
p
where equality holds only
if G is edge-uniformly 21
p
C-colorable.
ong all edge-maxim2) Amal 21
p
C-colorable graph G,

2pif an
21
bG EG
p
only if d 21 .
s
p
GCK
Proof. 1) Notice that 21 1)/(2)(2
p
pp
CK

,
 
2
21
p
bG EG
p
follows from Toheorem 1.3. Nw
suppose that
 
2
bG 21p
momorphism 1
pEG . Let
be an arbitrarily given graph ho-


21
:p
VG VC
and for each 2
p
iZ
, let
1
ii
Vv
.
Set
1
,
iii
V
, foWVr each 21
p
iZ
. Since
is a
at
graph homomorphism, we have

21pi
iZ
EG W
. It
follows th

2
0
p
i
i
E W
may assume that G. We

021
min :
ip
WWiZ

. Then -
tion on we h

0
EG W is an edge
cut of G, and so by the assumpave G,
 
2
01
21
p
i
i
EG W W
p
. It fol-
2pbGEG 
lows that
 
22
222
pp
ii
01
1
ii
pW Gp

pE W
.
Hence 0112
2.
p
pWW WW By the choice of
0
X
, we must have 01 2p
WW W. Let 0
mW
.
Then for any edge
21p
eEC
,

1em
. Since
is armly
1
bitrarily, then forG is edge-uni
2
p
C
-colorable.
2) Suppose that G is an edge-m21
p
C
aximal -color-
le graph with

ab

2
21
bG EG
p
. Let
as in 1). Sin
p be de-
ce G is an edge-maximal
i
W
fined
21
p
C
-colorable graph, the subgraph induces byi is
a W
complete bipartite

graph. Since

2p
21pEG, by 1), G is edge-uniformly
bG 21
p
C
-
colorable, which means, 01 2
p
WW Where-
fore,
T
01 2p
VVV s
  for some positive integer
o s and s21.
s
K
p
GC
Conversely, suppose 21.
s
pKGC


Note that

2
21m.
spK



21p
EC Then
2
 and so it suffices to show t
ubset
21 2pm
ps
K
 hat for bC
any s
21 s
p
XKVC
 

and
21 \
ps
KCYV
,
X
Y
X

 , the edge cut
of 21p
s
K
C
satisfies
2
,2pmXY.
Let
,
X
Y be an edge cut of 21p
s
K
C

such that
1)
,
X
Y is maximct to 1 ized and subje), 2)
:
i
iXY mi0
i
is minized, where ii
X
XV and
.
ii
YYV
ince 12
,
ii
VV

SiI iI
 , where
121
:is odd
p
I i
 and
221
:i
p
IiZi

seven,
n
iZ
is an edge cut with cardinality 2 pm2, the

1
i
iI
V
 Then we
2
2
,,2pm.
i
iI
XY V


 have the
following claims:
Claim 1. For each i, 0.
ii
XY
Proof. Otherwise, there is i such that 0
ii
XY . Let
11ii
sX X
 and 1ii
tYY


1
. If
s
t, let
i
X
XY
and \i
YYY
. Then
,
X
Y

is an edge
cut of m
G such that
,,YX
and Y
X
Copyright © 2011 SciRes. AM
S. H. FAN ET AL.
Copyright © 2011 SciRes. AM
1269
$

:0:01
iii i
iXY iXY
 
 
, c the ontrary to
choice of
,
X
Y. Then
s
t.
. Le
Withoss o
ity, we ma s < tout lf general-
y assumet i
X
X
 nd \Y a
i
YY
Y
.
Then
,
X
Y is an ech that
 dge cut of m
G su

,, ,
i
X
YX
 YtsY Y
 X
, contrary to the
choice of
,
X
Y.
Claim 2. There is exactlyof con
numbe
one pair secutive
r
,1ii
pair of c
in

0,1,,2 pwe consider (0 and
2p as a obers
nsecutive num, too) such that
1ii
X
X
.
Proof. By Claim 1 and the structure of 21p
s
K
C
,
there exist sompair ofe numbers e consecutiv
,1ii
in
0,1,, 2p such that 1ii
X
X
Since
2
,2pmXY,
then there is at most one pair of consecutive number
,1i in i
0,1,,2 p such that 1ii
X
Xo
and s
By Claim 2,
Claim 2 follows.
1 and Claim
2
,2pm
XY .
4. References
[1] . Murty, “Graph Theory
Applications,” American Elsevier, New York, 1976.
ted-
s, Vol. 54, No.
[2] P. Erdös, “Problems and Results in Graph Theory and
Combinatorial Analysis,” Graph Theory and Rela
Topics, Academic Press, New York, 1979.
[3] M. O. Albertson and K. L. Gibbons, “Homomorphisms of
3-Chromatic Graphs,” Discrete Mathematic
2, 1985, pp. 127-132.
doi:10.1016/0012-365X(85)90073-1
[4] M. O. Albertson, P. A. Catlin and L. Gibbons, “Homo-
morphisms of 3-Chromatic Graphs II,” Congressus Nu-
ies B, Vol. 45, No.
merantium, Vol. 47, 1985, pp. 19-28.
[5] P. A. Catlin, “Graph Homomorphisms onto the 5-Cycle,”
Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Ser
2, 1988, pp. 199-211.
doi:10.1016/0095-8956(88)90069-X
[6] E. R. Scheinerman and
Theory,” John Wiley Sons, Inc., New
D. H. Ullman, “Fractional Graph
York, 1997.
l. 153,
Combinatorics, Vol. 3,
[7] G. G. Gao and X. X. Zhu, “Star-Extremal Graphs and the
Lexicographic Product,” Discrete Mathematics, Vo
1996, pp. 147-156.
[8] S. Poljak and Z. Tuza, “Maximum Bipartite Subgraphs of
Kneser Graphs,” Graphs and
1987, pp. 191-199. doi:10.1007/BF01788540
A. J. Bondy and U. S. R with