Journal of Modern Physics
					Vol.06 No.08(2015), Article ID:58184,7 pages
                                            
                                            10.4236/jmp.2015.68112
                                        
Bounds on the Number of Light Neutrinos Species,
                                             Coupling and Z − Z′ Mixing Angle in a U(1)B−L Model
Coupling and Z − Z′ Mixing Angle in a U(1)B−L Model
A. González-Sánchez1,2, A. Gutiérrez-Rodríguez1*, M. A. Hernández-Ruíz3
1Facultad de Fsica, Universidad Autónoma de Zacatecas, Zacatecas, México
2LERMA, CNRS UMR 8112, Observatoire de Paris, Paris, France
3Facultad de Ciencias Qumicas, Universidad Autónoma de Zacatecas, Zacatecas, México
Email: *alexgu@fisica.uaz.edu.mx
Copyright © 2015 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).
                                    

Received 28 March 2015; accepted 19 July 2015; published 22 July 2015
                                    
ABSTRACT
The constraints on the number of neutrinos generations,
                                     coupling and
coupling and
                                     mixing angle through the invisible width method, and in the framework of a
                                    mixing angle through the invisible width method, and in the framework of a
                                     model are obtained. Based on the experimental value reported by the LEP for the rate
                                    model are obtained. Based on the experimental value reported by the LEP for the rate , we obtained a bound on the
, we obtained a bound on the
                                     coupling,
                                    coupling, . In addition, we derive 90% C.L. bounds on the
. In addition, we derive 90% C.L. bounds on the
                                     mixing angle
                                    mixing angle , improving the existing bounds by one order of magnitude.
, improving the existing bounds by one order of magnitude.
Keywords:
Ordinary Neutrinos, Neutral Currents, Models beyond the Standard Model
                                    
1. Introduction
The number of fermion generations, which is associated to the number of light neutrinos, is one of the most important predictions of the Standard Model of the electroweak interactions (SM) [1] -[3] . In the SM, the decay width of the Z boson into each neutrino family is calculated to be
                                     [4] . Additional generations, or other new weakly interacting particles with masses below
                                    [4] . Additional generations, or other new weakly interacting particles with masses below , would lead to a decay width of the Z into invisible channels larger than the SM prediction for three families while a smaller value could be produced, for example, by the presence of one or more right-handed neutrinos mixed with the left-handed ones [5] . Thus the number of light neutrinos generations
, would lead to a decay width of the Z into invisible channels larger than the SM prediction for three families while a smaller value could be produced, for example, by the presence of one or more right-handed neutrinos mixed with the left-handed ones [5] . Thus the number of light neutrinos generations , defined as the ratio between the measured invisible decay width of the Z,
, defined as the ratio between the measured invisible decay width of the Z,
                                     , and the SM expectation
, and the SM expectation
                                     for each neutrino family, needs not be an integer number and has to be measured with the highest possible accuracy.
                                    for each neutrino family, needs not be an integer number and has to be measured with the highest possible accuracy.
The most precise measurement of the number of light
                                     active neutrino types, and therefore the number of associated fermion families, comes from the invisible Z width
                                    active neutrino types, and therefore the number of associated fermion families, comes from the invisible Z width , obtained by subtracting the observed width into quarks and charged leptons from the total width obtained from the lineshape. The number of effective neutrinos
, obtained by subtracting the observed width into quarks and charged leptons from the total width obtained from the lineshape. The number of effective neutrinos
                                    
                                    
where
                                    
In the SM the experimental value from the four LEP experiments for the number of light neutrinos species is
                                    
The existence of a heavy neutral
                                    





Our aim in this paper is to estimate constraints on the number of neutrinos generations,
                                    


This paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we present the theoretical framework. In Section 3 we present the numerical computation. Finally, we summarize our conclusions in Section 4.
2. Theoretical Framework
We consider a
                                    


                                    
where





The Lagrangian for the scalar sector of the
                                    
                                    
where the potential term is [23] ,
                                    
with
                                    

                                    
where the doublet and singlet scalars are
                                    
with





From the Lagrangian of the
                                    

                                    
where the couplings of the
                                    
                                    
                                    
where
                                    





3. Results
In order to compare the respective expressions with the experimental result for the number of light neutrinos species

Since Equation (2) reduces the influence of the top quark mass, the expression
                                    
order to get information on the meaning of
                                    

The definition given in Equation (2) replaces the expression
                                    
top quarks mass. To get information on the meaning of
                                    

                                    
where
                                    
                                    
with
                                    



This new expression is a function of the mixing angle
                                    
















In order to estimate a limit for the number of light neutrinos species
                                    




In Figure 2, we plot the function (11) in the
                                    



is a result of both factors in Equation (11). In this figure
                                    

broading. This analysis was done using the experimental value given in Equation (2) for
                                    



                                    
whose central value is quite close to the standard model of three active neutrinos species.
                                        
Figure 1.
                                        


                                        
Figure 2. Allowed region for
                                        



The correlation between the mixing angle
                                    





By reversing the process we determined a limit on the
                                    






                                    
which is consistent with that obtained through from a Renormalisation Group Equation (RGE) analysis [30] - [32] .
Finally, is clear that the effects induced by the tree level
                                    










4. Conclusion
From the invisible width method and and in the framework of a
                                    










                                        
Figure 3. Correlation between
                                        

                                        
Figure 4. The curve shows the shape for
                                        


                                        
Figure 5. The curves shows the shape for
                                        


Table 1. Bounds on the
                                        

Acknowledgments
We acknowledge support from CONACyT, SNI, PROMEP and PIFI (México).
Cite this paper
A.González-Sánchez,A.Gutiérrez-Rodríguez,M. A.Hernández-Ruíz, (2015) Bounds on the Number of Light Neutrinos Species, g'1 Coupling and Z - Z′ Mixing Angle in a U(1)B-L Model. Journal of Modern Physics,06,1077-1084. doi: 10.4236/jmp.2015.68112
References
- 1. Glashow, S.L. (1961) Nuclear Physics, 22, 579-588. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0029-5582(61)90469-2
- 2. Weinberg, S. (1967) Physical Review Letters, 19, 1264. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.19.1264
- 3. Salam, A. (1968) In: Svartholm, N., Ed., Elementary Particle Theory, Almquist and Wiskell, Stockholm, 367.
- 4.  Olive, K.A., et al. (Particle Data Group) (2014) Chinese Physics C, 38, Article ID: 090001.
                                            
 http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1674-1137/38/9/090001
- 5. Jarlskog, C. (1990) Physics Letters B, 241, 579-583. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(90)91873-A
- 6. Abbaneo, D., et al. (n.d.) (LEP), arXiv: hep-ex/0412015.
- 7. Acciarri, M., et al. (L3 Collaboration) (1994) Z. Phys., C62, 551.
- 8. Buskulic, D., et al. (ALEPH Collaboration) (1994) Z. Phys., C62, 539.
- 9.  Barger, V., Kneller, J.P., Lee, H.S., Marfatia, D. and Steigman, G. (2003) Physics Letters B, 566, 8-18.
                                            
 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0370-2693(03)00800-1
- 10. Hannestad, S. (n.d.) arXiv: astro-ph/0303076.
- 11. Cyburt, R.H., Fields, B.D. and Olive, K.A. (2003) http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0302431
- 12. Ichikawa, K., Kawasaki, M. and Takahashi, F. (2007) http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0611784
- 13. Robinett, R.W. (1982) Physical Review D, 26, 2388-2395. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.26.2388
- 14.  Green, M.B. and Schwarz, J.H. (1984) Physics Letters B, 149, 117-122.
 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(84)91565-X
- 15. Mohapatra, R.N. and Pal, P.B. (1991) Massive Neutrinos in Physics and Astrophysics. World Scientific, Singapore. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/1246
- 16.  Senjanovic, G. (1979) Nuclear Physics B, 153, 334-364.
 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(79)90604-7
- 17.  Senjanovic, G. and Mohapatra, R.N. (1975) Physical Review D, 12, 1502-1505.
 http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.12.1502
- 18.  Baur, U., Schildknecht, D. and Schwarzer, K.H.G. (1987) Physical Review D, 35, 297-304.
 http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.35.297
- 19. Jenkins, E. (1987) Physics Letters B, 192, 219-222. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(87)91172-5
- 20.  Buchmuller, W., Greub, C. and Minkowski, P. (1991) Physics Letters B, 267, 395-399.
 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(91)90952-M
- 21.  Emam, W. and Khalil, S. (2007) The European Physical Journal C, 52, 625-633.
 http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-007-0411-7
- 22. Abe, T., American Linear Collider Working Group, et al. (2011) http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ex/0106057.
- 23. Basso, L., Belyaev, A., Moretti, S., Pruna, G.M. and Shepherd-Themistocleous, C.H. (2011) The European Physical Journal C, 71, 1613. http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-011-1613-6
- 24.  Ferroglia, A., Lorca, A. and van der Bij, J.J. (2007) Annalen der Physik, 16, 563-578.
 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/andp.200710249
- 25. Rizzo, T.G. (2006) http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0610104.
- 26. L3 Collaboration, Acciarri, M., et al. (1994) Zeitschrift für Physik C, 62, 551-576.
- 27.  Huerta, R., Maya, M. and Miranda, O.G. (1997) Zeitschrift für Physik C Particles and Fields, 73, 701-703.
 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002880050362
- 28.  Gutiérrez-Rodrguez, A., Hernández-Ruiz, M.A., Pérez, M.A. and Pérez-Vargas, F. (2007)
 http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0702076.
- 29. Gutiérrez-Rodrguez, A., Hernández-Ruiz, M.A., Pérez, M.A. and Pérez-Vargas, F. (2009) Modern Physics Letters A, 24, 135-141. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0217732309027431
- 30. Basso, L. (2007) A Minimal Extension of the Standard Model with B.L Gauge Symmetry. Master’s Thesis, Università degli Studi di Padova, Padova. http://www.hep.phys.soton.ac.uk/???l.basso/BL
- 31.  Chankowski, P.H., Pokorski, S. and Wagner, J. (2006) The European Physical Journal C, 47, 187-205.
 http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s2006-02537-3
- 32.  del Aguila, F., Coughlan, G.D. and Quiros, M. (1988) Nuclear Physics B, 307, 633-648.
 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(88)90266-0
NOTES
                                    
*Corresponding author.








