Advances in Materials Physics and Chemistry
Vol.3 No.1(2013), Article ID:29136,6 pages DOI:10.4236/ampc.2013.31007

Effect of Pressure on the Superconducting and Mechanical Properties of Bi1.6Pb0.4Sr1.8Ba0.2Ca2Cu2.2Ni0.8O10+( System

Ghazala Y. Hermiz*, Bushra A. Aljurani, Hassan A. Thabit

Physics Department, College of Science, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq

Email: *

Received January 4, 2013; revised February 7, 2013; accepted February 17, 2013

Keywords: Pressure Effect; Superconductor; Mechanical Properties


Solid state reaction method was used to prepare samples of Bi1.6Pb0.4Sr1.8Ba0.2Ca2Cu2.2Ni0.8O10+d. Superconducting and mechanical properties by Vickers microhardness measurements have been carried out to examine the effects of pressure. Electrical measurement demonstrates the best transition temperature was under 0.7 GPa. An improvement of mechanical properties was found when the pressure increases from 0.3 GPa to 0.9 GPa. On the other side an increases of the pressure to 1.1 GPa decrease in the micro hardness, Young modulus and yield strength.

1. Introduction

Considerable efforts have been made in the synthesis, processing, and characterization of BiSrCaCuO superconducting ceramics because these materials have a higher Tc and good chemical durability (resistance to moisture), and also they contain no rare earth elements [1-3]. However, the bulks sometimes fracture due to the thermal stress on the cooling process or the electromagnetic force during the magnetization. Thus, it has been recognized that improvement and understanding of the mechanical properties of bulks are indispensable for practical application.

Ahn [4] prepared superconducting BiSrCaCu(Ni)O ceramics by the gel method using an aqueous solution containing a tartaric acid. Their ceramic microstructure were studied using IR, TGA, XRD, resistance measurements, and SEM. They found that the nickel dopant substituting for Cu gives rise to the gradual decrease of the Tc and the pure phase 2212 ceramics were obtained at sintering temperature 1098 K for 24 hs. SEM pictures showed that liquid phase was formed when the samples were sintered temperatures higher than 1098 K.

The effect of silver additions on the mechanical and superconducting properties of sintered bulk YBCO, BSCCO-2212, and BSCCO-2223 has been evaluated by Joo et al. [5] their results show that strength and fracture toughness of YBCO and BSCCO bars increased with increasing Ag content up to 30 vol% Ag. These improvements in strength and fracture toughness are due to the presence of Ag particles that may induce compressive stresses in the superconducting matrix and resist crack propagation by pinning the propagating cracks. On the other hand, the hardness of YBCO and BSCCO decreased with increasing Ag contents because of the lower hardness of Ag. Addition of Ag showed no adverse effects on superconducting properties of YBCO or BSCCO superconductors.

Katagiri et al. [6] summarize the evaluation process of the mechanical properties for various high-temperature superconducting bulks. The Young’s modulus, Poisson’s ratio, fracture strength, fracture toughness and hardness are evaluated by tensile, bending, compression and hardness tests. The mechanical properties are anisotropic, mainly due to the crystallographic structure and pre-existing micro-cracks associated with it.

Madre et al. [7] measured the flexural strength of 1 wt% Ag-doped Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ thin rods textured by a laser heated floating zone as a function of the environmental conditions (air versus water) at room temperature. Loading rates spanning three orders of magnitude (1, 10 and 100 μm/min) were used to explore their susceptibility to the environmental conditions. These mechanical tests were completed with electrical characterization (critical current at 77 K and resistivity from 77 to 300 K) of samples submerged in distilled water for different time lengths (0, 12 and 120 h). While Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ has been shown to be unstable during contact with water molecules, the Ag-doped Bi-2212 textured rods tested are very inert to the water environment, with respect to their mechanical and electrical properties, due to the presence of a narrow (≈150 μm) low textured outer ring formed in the growth process.

In the previous work [8], mechanical properties of Bi1.6Pb0.4Sr1.8Ba0.2Ca2Cu2.2Ni0.8O10+δ superconducting system pressed under 0.5 GPa were investigated. In this research, effect of pressure on the critical temperature (Tc), oxygen content (δ) and mechanical properties of the superconducting system have been studied.

2. Experimental Part

Bi1.6Pb0.4Sr1.8Ba0.2Ca2Cu2.2Ni0.8O10+δ samples were prepared by conventional solid-state reaction method. Appropriate amounts of Bi2O3(99.9%), Pb3O4(99.9%), SrCO3 (99.9%), BaCO3(99.9%), CaO(99.9%), CuO(99.9%) and Ni2O3(99.9%) powders were used as starting materials. The powder of precursor was mixed together by using agate mortar. The mixture homogenization takes place by adding a sufficient quantity of 2 - propanol to form a past during the process of grinding from about (1 h). In the second step, the materials were grounded to a fine powder and then calcined in air at 1073 K for 24 hs, the mixture was then pressed into pellets (1.3 cm) in diameter and (0.2) cm thick, using hydraulic type (SPECAC), under pressure of 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, 0.9 and 1.1 GPa. The pellets were sintered in air at 1123 K for 140 hs.

Iodometric titration was used to find the oxygen content (δ) in the samples. Four probe dc method at temperature range (77 - 300) K was used to measure the resistivity (ρ) and to determine the critical temperature (Tc).

The mechanical properties, such as the Vickers microhardness (HV), Young modulus (E) and yield strength (Y) of superconductor samples were calculated as referred in the previous paper [8].

3. Results and Discussion

In order to examine the effect of the pressure on critical temperature Tc, samples of Bi1.6Pb0.4Sr1.8Ba0.2Ca2Cu2.2 Ni0.8 O10+d were sintered at 1123 K for 140 hs under different pressures (0.3, 0.5, 0.7, 0.9 and 1.1) GPa. The resistivity behavior as a function of temperature for Bi1.6 Pb0.4 Sr1.8Ba0.2Ca2Cu2.2Ni0.8O10+d at different pressures are shown in Figure 1. From this figure we can see the increase of the critical temperature Tc from 113 K to 117 K with increasing pressure from 0.5 GPa and 0.7 GPa, while an increase of the pressure to 1.1 GPa causes a reduction of transition temperature to 93 K. It is believed that the increase of the critical temperature with increasing pressure from 0.3 to 0.7 GPa, as listed in Table 1 may be due to the increase of the carrier concentration nh in the CuO2 planes, the change of nh within the unit cell resulting in the improvement of the critical temperature [9]. Also Vonsovsky et al. [10] indicate that the deviation from stoichioctry and disordering of these compound lead to decrease the value of Tc with the pressure.

It is found from Table 1 that the oxygen content (δ) of the samples increases as the pressure increases. This is clearly shown for samples under 0.3 GPa, 0.5 GPa and 0.7 GPa, the oxygen content (δ) is 0.191, 0.246 and 0.368 respectively. The enhancement of the pressure is going to enhance the hole concentration in the Cu-O2 layers, also enhancing the critical temperature Tc from nearly 110, 113 K to 117 K respectively, while increases the pressure to 1.1 GPa decreases the oxygen content (δ) and the critical temperature Tc as shown in Figure 2. This indicates that the increase in the critical temperature Tc and the oxygen content (δ) values is attributed to the increase of oxygen absorption during crystallization process of the superconductors. From the results we can conclude that the oxygen content (δ) equal 0.368 is optimum

Figure 1. Temperature dependence of resistivity for Bi1.6Pb0.4Sr1.8Ba0.2 Ca2Cu2.2Ni0.8O10+d under different pressure.

Figure 2. Transition temperature and oxygen content for Bi1.6Pb0.4Sr1.8Ba0.2 Ca2Cu2.2Ni0.8 O10+d under different pressure.

Figure 3. Variation of microhardness with applied load for different pressures.

Figure 4. The variations of microhardness (Hv) as a function of pressure for different loads.

Figure 5. Variations of Young’s modulus (E) as a function of pressure for different loads.

Figure 6. Variations of yield strength (Y) as a function of pressure for different loads.

Table 1. Oxygen content and critical temperature (Tc) for (Bi0.8Pb0.2)2(Sr0.9Ba0.1)2Ca2Cu2.2Ni0.8O10+d under different pressures.

Table 2. Microhardness (Hv), Young modulus (E) and yield strength (Y) for different load for Bi1.6Pb0.4Sr1.8Ba0.2Ca2Cu2.2 Ni0.8O10+d under different pressure and different loads.

value for the critical temperature Tc 117 K under pressure 0.7 GPa.

The effects of pressure on the mechanical properties of Bi1.6Pb0.4Sr1.8Ba0.2Ca2Cu2.2Ni0.8O10+d samples were studied. The samples were pressed under 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, 0.9 and 1.1 GPa. It is noticed from Figure 3 a decreases of the microhardness with increases of load for samples under different pressures. This behavior may attribute to the presence of weak grain boundaries of the superconducting ceramics.

Figures 4-6 and Table 2 shows the variation of Vickers microhardness, Young modulus and yield strength, as a function of pressure for different loads. An increase of microhardness, Young’s modulus and yield strength was observed with increasing pressure from 0.3 GPa to 0.9 GPa. This result indicates that an enhancement of the pressure work on article contacts which get rearranged to fill the voids and pores resulting in more densification of the specimen [11], which leads to a remarkable increase in the mechanical resistance of the samples. On the other side an increase of pressure to 1.1 GPa reduces the microhardness, Young’s modulus and yield strength. This decrease of mechanical properties is due to the decrease in strength of bonding between the grains and consequently causes the degradation [12].

4. Conclusions

1) The highest critical temperature was 117 K under 0.7 GPa.

2) A remarkable increase, in the mechanical resistance of the samples was observed with the increase of the pressure from 0.3 GPa to 0.9 GPa. On the other hand an increase of the pressure to 1.1 GPa reduces these properties.


  1. T. D. Xiao, K. E. Gonsalves and P. R. Strutt, “Synthesis of Aluminum Nitride/Boron Nitride Composite Materials,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, Vol. 76, No. 4, 1993, pp. 987-992. doi:10.1111/j.1151-2916.1993.tb05323.x
  2. P. L. Chen and I. W. Chen, “Sintering of Fine Oxide Powders: I, Microstructural Evolution,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, Vol. 79, No. 12, 1996, pp. 3129- 3135. doi:10.1111/j.1151-2916.1996.tb08087.x
  3. D. R.Yang, D. S. Tsai and H. C. Liu, “Raising Pyrolysis Yield of Preceramic Polymers of Silicon Carbonitride,” Journal of Material Science, Vol. 30, No. 17, 1995, pp. 4463-4468. doi:10.1007/BF00361532
  4. B. S. Ahn, “Synthesis of BiSrCaCu(Ni)O Ceramics from the Gel Precursors and the Effect of Ni Substitution,” Bulletin Korean Chemical Society, Vol. 23, No. 9, 2002, pp. 1304-1308. doi:10.5012/bkcs.2002.23.9.1304
  5. J. Joo, J. P. Singh, T. Warzynski, A. Grow and R. B. Poeppel, “Role of Silver Addition on Mechanical and Superconducting Properties of High-Tc Superconductors” Applied Superconductivity, Vol. 2, No. 6, 1994, pp. 401- 410. doi:10.1016/0964-1807(94)90087-6
  6. K. Katagiri, A. Murakami and K. Kasaba, “Evaluation of Mechanical Properties of High-Temperature Superconducting Bulks Fabricated by a Melt-Processing,” Cryogenics, Vol. 48, No. 3-4, 2008, pp. 87-94. doi:10.1016/j.cryogenics.2008.02.003
  7. M. A. Madre1, Sh. Rasekh, J. C. Diez and A. Sotelo, “Dynamic Fatigue Behaviour of Ag-Doped Bi-2212 Textured Thin Rods,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Vol. 153, No. 1, 2009, Article ID: 012021.
  8. G. Y. Hermiz, B. A. Aljurani and H. A. Thabit, “Mechanical Properties of Bi1.6Pb0.4Sr1.8Ba0.2Ca2Cu3−xNixO10+δ Superconducting System,” Journal of Superconductivity and Novel Magnetism, Vol. 25, No. 6, 2012, pp. 1629- 1634. doi:10.1007/s10948-012-1584-3
  9. X. J. Chen, H. Q. Lin and C. D. Gong, “Pressure Dependence of T(c) in Y-Ba-Cu-O Superconductors,” Physical Review Letter, Vol. 85, No. 10, 2000, pp. 2180-2183. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.2180
  10. S. V. Vonsovsk, Yu. A. Lzumov and E. Z. Kurmaev, “Superconductivity of Transition Metals,” Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1982.
  11. V. M. Anandakumar and M. A. Khadar, “Microhardness Studies of Nanocrystalline Calcium Tungstate,” Crystal Research and Technology, Vol. 43, No. 2, 2008, pp. 193- 199. doi:10.1002/crat.200710987
  12. O. Gorur, M. Nursoy, C. Terzioglu, A. Varilci and I. Belenli, “Influence of Annealing Temperature on the Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of MgB2,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Vol. 153, No. 1, 2009, Article ID: 012012.


*Corresponding author.