Open Journal of Organic Polymer Materials
Vol.3 No.4(2013), Article ID:38808,7 pages DOI:10.4236/ojopm.2013.34018

Significant Improvement of Mechanical Properties for Polyvinyl Alcohol Film Prepared from Freeze/Thaw Cycled Gel

Taishi Fukumori, Takahiko Nakaoki*

Department of Materials Chemistry, Ryukoku University, Otsu, Japan

Email: *nakaoki@rins.ryukoku.ac.jp

Copyright © 2013 Taishi Fukumori, Takahiko Nakaoki. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received July 25, 2013; revised August 25, 2013; accepted September 1, 2013

Keywords: Polyvinyl Alcohol; Mechanical Properties; Freeze/Thaw Cycle; Film

ABSTRACT

The mechanical properties of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) films prepared by evaporating water from freeze/thaw cycled gel were investigated as a function of the number of freeze/thaw cycles. The maximum stress of the PVA film prepared by freeze/thaw cycling was larger than that prepared without the freeze/thaw cycle process. The largest maximum stress was 46.2 MPa for a film prepared with 10 freeze/thaw cycles, which was twice as large as that for a cast PVA film without freeze/thaw cycling (22.3 MPa). This is due to the formation of small crystallites during the freeze/thaw cycle process. Furthermore, when the film was annealed at 130˚C, the maximum stress was as high as 181 MPa which was comparable to that for PVA films prepared using additives. The crystallinity is not the main factor that determines the maximum stress for either the non-annealed or annealed freeze/thaw cycled films, but the glass transition temperature is well correlated with the maximum stress, irrespective of the annealing process. This is due to the different molecular morphology; the non-annealed freeze/thaw cycled film consists of many small crystallites, but the annealed film consists of larger crystallites formed during the annealing process.

1. Introduction

Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) is a representative water soluble polymer that is widely investigated as a host material for nanocomposites. There have been many reports on the mechanical properties of PVA films with additives. The mechanical properties are strongly dependent on the degree of saponification and the maximum stress for PVA film with saponification of ca. 98% is improved to ca. 60 MPa (original PVA: ca. 20 MPa) [1], 72 MPa (28 MPa) [2], and 42 MPa (17 MPa) [3] by the addition of Ag, aminoclay plus Ag, and graphene, respectively. PVA film with saponification of >99% provided higher maximum stress, such as 83 and 95 MPa reported by Zang et al. [4] and Morimune et al. [5], respectively, and further improvement to 148 and 124 MPa was achieved by the addition of polyvinylpyrolidone (PVP)/sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)/single wall carbon nanotubes (SWNTs) and nanodiamond, respectively. Significant improvement of the mechanical properties of PVA film was also recently reported using Na+-montmorillonite + Cu2+ and nanodiamond + SWNTs of which the maximum stresses were as high as ca. 320 MPa (original PVA: 40 MPa) [6] and 534.3 MPa (38.0 MPa) [7], respectively. Annealing is another factor used to improve the mechanical properties of PVA. PVA with saponification of 98% - 99% that was annealed at 130˚C exhibited a maximum stress as high as 137 MPa [8]. These results indicate that regulation of the morphology and crystallinity is important factors in improving the mechanical properties of PVA film.

PVA forms a stable hydrogel by physical cross-linking. It has been reported that repeated cycling processes of freezing at −20˚C and thawing at room temperature provides a thermoreversible hydrogel [9,10]. PVA hydrogel prepared by freeze/thaw cycles has attractive properties, such as good mechanical properties, rubber-like flexibility, and high water content. The molecular structure of this PVA hydrogel is characterized by the aggregation of water, swollen amorphous PVA containing water, and crystalline PVA which acts as a cross-linking point [11- 15]. The crystallinity of this gel is very low, in the range from 2.5% (1 cycle) to 6.3% (9 cycles) [13]. We have reported the coagulation size of water formed in the PVA hydrogel [16,17]. The coagulation diameter was estimated to be 30.2 nm for a 10 wt% gel after 2 freeze/ thaw cycles. Willcox et al. also reported the coagulation size of water with a diameter of 30 nm by cryogenic transmission electron microscopy (cryo-TEM) observation [18], which was in good agreement with our results [16,17].

The PVA hydrogel formed by freeze/thaw cycling has good mechanical properties. Small crystallites act as a cross-linking point to improve the mechanical properties. However, there has been no reports on the mechanical properties of PVA film prepared from a freeze/thaw cycled hydrogel. Therefore, the present work is focused on the mechanical properties of PVA film prepared by freeze/thaw cycle processes as a function of the number of freeze/thaw cycles.

2. Experimental

2.1. Sample Preparation

PVA with saponification of 98.5 mol% was provided by Kuraray Co., Ltd. The stereoregularity was determined to be mm = 0.23, mr = 0.48, and rr = 0.29 by 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) measurements [16]. A PVA cast film (CF) was formed by casting the 10 wt% PVA solution and drying at room temperature for over a week. The film formed using the freeze/thaw cycle process was prepared as follows. 10 wt% PVA was dissolved in water at 120˚C in an autoclave, and the PVA hydrogel was then formed by freezing at −20˚C for 5 min and thawing at 25˚C for 45 min. The number of freeze/thaw cycles employed was between 1 and 10. The gel was then dried at room temperature for over a week in a vacuum; this film is abbreviated as gel film-n (GF-n), where n denotes the number of freeze/thaw cycles. The films were annealed at 130˚C for 30 min in a thermostatic oven; the annealed cast and gel films are abbreviated as aCF and aGF-n, respectively.

2.2. Measurements

Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) was performed on a Rigaku 8230D instrument at a heating rate of 5˚C/ min from room temperature to 250˚C.

The mechanical properties were measured using a tensile testing instrument (Shimadzu Instron 5566). The PVA film sample was a lateral shape with dimensions of 3.0 × 1.0 cm2 and a thickness of 0.1 - 0.3 nm. Tensile measurements were conducted with a head speed of 0.5 mm/min for a least three film samples prepared under the same conditions, and the average value was adopted.

Dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) was performed on a dynamic viscoelasticity instrument (I.T. Instruments DVA-200). The heating rate was 3˚C/min in the range from −100 to 200˚C. The glass transition temperature (Tg) was determined from the initial temperature required to decrease the storage modulus.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Crystallinity of the Film Prepared by Freeze/Thaw Cycling

Thermal analysis of the PVA film prepared by evaporating water from the freeze/thaw cycle gel was investigated to determine the crystallinity. According to a previous report, the crystallinity of the freeze/thaw cycle gel is dependent on the number of freeze/thaw cycles [13]. Therefore, the crystallinity of the GFs was investigated as a function of the number of freeze/thaw cycles after the evaporation of water. Figure 1(A) shows DSC profiles for GFs after various numbers of freeze/thaw cycles. The melting temperature was observed around 220˚C irespective to the number of freeze/thaw cycles; however, the enthalpy for melting increased with the number of freeze/thaw cycles, which corresponds to an increase of crystallinity. Figure 2 shows the crystallinity as a function of the number of freeze/thaw cycles, where 138.6 J/g is used for 100% crystallinity of PVA [19]. The crystallinity of the CF was as low as 22.3%. A homogeneous solution of PVA/water was poured on a glass plate to form the CF; therefore, crystallization is induced by nucleation in the homogeneous solution and subsequent

(A)(B)

Figure 1. DSC profiles for of (A) GF and (B) aGF.

Figure 2. Crystallinity of the GF (●) and aGF (○) samples as a function of the freeze/thaw cycle number. The crystallinity increased with the number of freeze/thaw cycles for both films.

crystal growth during the water evaporation process. In the case of the GF, the crystallinity increased with the number of freeze/thaw cycles. The crystallinity of GF-1 became slightly larger at 23.1%, and the crystallinity of GF-10 was as high as 45.1%. The crystallinity of these films is expected have a direct dependence on that of the gel prior to water evaporation, because the crystallites in the gel act as nucleation sites. Ricciardi et al. estimated the crystallinity of a hydrogel prepared by the freeze/ thaw cycle process by X-ray diffraction analysis, and reported the PVA hydrogel consists of water aggregation, swollen PVA, and crystalline PVA.

The crystallinity was increased from 2.5% (1 cycle) to 6.3% (9 cycles) [13]. The crystallites act as nucleators during the water evaporation process; therefore, the extent of crystallinity in the film is dependent on the number of crystallites. Thus, the main factor for crystallization in the gel formed by the freeze/thaw cycle process is considered to be the formation of small crystallites or crystal growth from small crystallites.

Hernandez et al. reported that the storage modulus of a freeze/thaw gel was increased with the number of cycles. They concluded that the number of cross-links increases with each cycle [20]. Both the increase of crystallinity and the formation of cross-links when the freeze/thaw process is repeated indicate that more crystallites would be formed in the gel, which would lead to an increase of crystallinity. During the water evaporation process, the crystallites act as nucleators to promote crystallization. This results in an increase of crystallinity for the GF after the evaporation of water with repetition of the freeze/ thaw cycles.

Crystallization is further promoted when the film is annealed. DSC profiles and the crystallinity of the annealed films are shown in Figures 1(B) and 2, respectively. The crystallinity increased after annealing. The crystallinity of the GF was larger than 40%, and some of the aGF with low numbers of freeze/thaw cycles had similar crystallinity. For example, the crystallinity of 40.2% for GF-5 is similar to that of 40.1% for aGF-1. The main factor of crystallization for the GF is crystal growth from small crystallite nucleators induced in the gel, whereas that for the annealed film is due to thermally induced crystal growth. These processes result in different crystallite sizes. The mechanical properties of these films are discussed in the following section.

3.2. Mechanical Properties

Figure 3(a) shows stress-strain curves for CF and GF-10. There is a significant difference between the films with and without freeze/thaw cycling treatment. For the CF sample, the maximum stress was as low as 22.3 MPa, whereas that for the GF-10 sample was 46.2 MPa, which is approximately twice as large. The maximum stresses of PVA films with similar saponification of ca. 98.5% and additives of Ag, aminoclay plus Ag, and graphene have been reported to be ca. 60 [1], 72 [2], and 42 MPa [3], respectively. Therefore, the present result is comparable to a PVA film with additives. It should be noted that the GF used in this research contains no additive. Thus, the crystallites act as a cross-linking point, which has the same role as that of the additives in References [1-3].

(A) (B)

Figure 3. Stress-strain curves (A) before and (B) after annealing at 130˚C. (a) and (b) represent CF and GF-10, respectively. The film prepared using the freeze/thaw cycle process exhibited larger maximum stress. (c) and (d) represent aCF and aGF-10, respectively.

The maximum stress was increased when the films were annealed at 130˚C, as shown in Figure 3B(b). The maximum stress of the aGF-10 sample was as high as 180.6 MPa, which is larger than 103.4 MPa for the aCF. The maximum stress previously reported for a cast PVA film annealed at 130˚C was 137 MPa [8]. Therefore, it can be concluded that the annealing of the CF sample is effective to increase the maximum stress of the CF sample.

The maximum stress before and after annealing is plotted as a function of the number of freeze/thaw cycles in Figure 4. The maximum stress increased with the number of freeze/thaw cycles. At over seven freeze/thaw cycled, the maximum stress became almost constant for both films before and after annealing. The maximum stress increased from 22.3 MPa for CF to 46.2 MPa for GF-10, which is an increase of 2.1 times, whereas that for aCF at 103.4 MPa increased to 180.6 MPa for aGF- 10, which is 1.8 times larger. The increase in crystallinity is dependent on the number of freeze/thaw cycles; therefore, the maximum stress was plotted as a function of crystallinity in Figure 5. If the crystallization condition

Figure 4. Maximum stress GF (●) and aGF (○) depending on freeze/thaw cycle time. The maximum stress for the aGF samples was approximately three times larger than that for the GF samples.

Figure 5. Relationship between the maximum stress and crystallinity for the GF (●) and aGF (○) samples. Even for GF and aGF films with the same crystallinity, the maximum stress was different. Therefore, the difference in maximum stress is due to the molecular morphology.

is the same, then the maximum stress can be fitted by a function. However, the dependence on crystallinity was completely different for the films before and after annealing. Therefore, the same crystallinity before and after annealing did not provide the same strain. For example, the films with ca. 40% crystallinity; the GF-1 and aGF-5 samples had maximum stress at 22.3 MPa and 150.2 MPa, respectively. It can be concluded that the maximum stress of PVA films prepared under different crystallization condition is not dependent on the crystallinity; therefore, the molecular morphology should be considered. The morphological difference is attributed to the number of crystallites and the size of the crystallites. The crystallites in the GF would be small, because the film has not been annealed, and comparatively small crystallites would be dispersed in the film. In contrast, crystal growth occurs in the aGF by annealing, so that the crystallites are larger than those in the GF. This corresponds that smaller amount of crystallites provides high crystallinity. As a result, the GF requires more freeze/thaw cycles than the aGF to obtain the same crystallinity. Therefore, it was concluded that there is no direct relationship between the maximum stress and the crystallinity for GF and aGF.

Young’s modulus is plotted for GF and aGF as a function of the freeze/thaw cycle in Figure 6. A similar trend to that for the maximum stress is observed, where the Young’s modulus increases with the number of freeze/ thaw cycles. Young’s modulus was in the range between 1.8 GPa for CF and 4.7 GPa for GF-10. After annealing, the modulus increased to between 2.6 for aCF and 8.9 GPa for aGF-10. The aGF-7 sample had the largest Young’s modulus of 9.8 MPa. This is more than three times larger after freeze/thaw cycles. Konidari et al. reported that a PVA film annealed at 130˚C has a Young’s modulus of 2.26 GPa [8]. Compared with this result, the

Figure 6. Young’s modulus for the GF (●) and aGF (○) samples as a function of the freeze/thaw cycle number. The elastic modulus increased with the freeze/thaw cycle number for both films. The elastic modulus for aGF-6 was as high as 9.8 GPa, which is larger than that previously reported for PVA films with additives [1-3].

Young’s modulus for aGF-7 is much larger. The present results are comparable with that reported for a PVA (saponification of 99%)/nanodiamond (5 wt%) composite with a Young’s modulus of 10.6 GPa [5].

The elongation at break is plotted against the number of freeze/thaw cycles in Figure 7. The CF had large elongation at break of 310%. The elongation at break was slightly reduced from 290% for GF-1 to 266% for GF-10. The crystallinity of the GF is higher than that of CF; therefore, non-crystalline chains between crystallites would be more distorted in the GF compared with the CF. This results in smaller strain for the GF. When the films are annealed, the strain is less than 10% for both cast and gel films.

The crystallinity, mechanical properties, and Tg for the CF, GF10, aCF, and aGF10 samples are summarized in Table 1. The GF has a comparatively large maximum stress and Young’s modulus and very large elongation at break, which corresponds to a ductile film. The aGF is characterized by very large maximum stress and Young’s modulus and very small elongation at break, which corresponds to a strong film with no ductile properties.

3.3. Glass Transition Temperature of Gel Film

The mechanical properties are related not only to the cry-

Figure 7. Elongation at break for the GF (●) and aGF (○) samples as a function of the freeze/thaw cycle number. The strain for the GF sample decreased with the freeze/thaw cycle number. The strain for the aGF sample was less than 10%, which was much smaller than that for the GF, due to the higher crystallinity of the aGF sample.

Table 1. Crystallinity, mechanical properties, and Tg for the CF, GF10, aCF, and aGF10 samples.

stallinity, but also the molecular structure of amorphous. Therefore, Tg was measured using DMA. Figure 8 shows the dependence of the storage modulus on the temperature for CF and GF before and after annealing at 130˚C. The Tg of CF was observed at 22.3˚C, whereas that for the GF-10 was 42.8˚C. A comparatively large number of small crystallites are formed in the GF. The amorphous chain between crystallites would be more distorted than that for CF, so that the Tg is higher. When the films are annealed, the Tg increases for both CF and GF. The crystal growth due to annealing makes the amorphous region small, and the amorphous chain would be more distorted, which results in higher Tg.

Figure 9 shows Tg as a function of the number of freeze/thaw cycles. Tg increases with the number of freeze/thaw cycles for both GF and aGF. The Tg of aGF increased from 45.3˚C for aGF-1 to 72.1˚C for aGF-10, in contrast to the increase from 27.6˚C to 45.2˚C for the non-annealed GF. This can be explained by the increase in distorted non-crystalline chains between crystallites with annealing.

The relationship between the maximum stress and Tg was investigated. Figure 10 shows the maximum stress as a function of Tg. In contrast to the relationship between the maximum stress and the crystallinity shown in Figure 5, the experimental result can be fitted by the following equation:

(A) (B)

Figure 8. Dynamical mechanical analysis results for the (A) GF and (B) aGF samples. (a) and (b) represent CF and GF- 10, respectively. The film prepared using the freeze/thaw cycle process exhibited higher Tg. (c) and (d) represent aCF and aGF-10, respectively.

Figure 9. Tg for the GF (●) and aGF (○) films as a function of the freeze/thaw cycle number. Tg increased with the freeze/thaw cycle number and was higher for the aGF sample than the GF sample.

Figure 10. Relationship between the maximum stress and Tg for the GF (●) and aGF (○) samples.

(1)

where Smax denotes the maximum stress. Therefore, the maximum stress can be expressed as a function of Tg. The mobile component of the amorphous chain, which results in low Tg, would be broken more easily than the hard one. Therefore, it is concluded that the important factor that determines the maximum stress is Tg. Thus, high Tg, which corresponds to less mobile amorphous chains, results in an increase of the maximum stress.

4. Conclusions

The mechanical properties of PVA films prepared from freeze/thaw cycled gel were investigated. During the water evaporation process, crystal growth was promoted by the small crystallites formed in the gel during the freeze/ thaw cycle process. The crystallinity of the GF increased with the number of freeze/thaw cycles, which corresponded to the formation of more crystallites. The maximum stress of the GF was larger than that of the CF and increased with the number of freeze/thaw cycles. The largest maximum stress of GF was 46.2 MPa for GF-10, which was approximately twice that of 22.3 MPa for the CF. No additives were used in these films, but the maximum stress of the GF was comparable with previously reported PVA films containing additives. Annealing of the films at 130˚C resulted in an increase of the maximum stress. The maximum stress of 46.2 MPa for GF-10 became 180.6 MPa for aGF-10. The Young’s modulus was as high as 9.8 GPa for aGF-7, which was three times larger than that for aCF at 2.6 GPa. The elongation at break for GF was almost comparable to that for CF, and it remained small for aCF and aGF after annealing. In conclusion, GF was stronger and more ductile than CF, and the aGF was much stronger with small strain.

The maximum stress was not well correlated with the crystallinity for GF and aGF, but was fitted as a function of Tg using Equation (1), where high Tg corresponded to rigid amorphous chain between crystallites that resulted in large maximum stress. This can be explained by the molecular morphology. The non-annealed GF consists of small crystallites, but the aGF film consists of comparatively large crystallites promoted by the annealing process. Crystal growth allows the amorphous chains to become more distorted.

5. Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr. Ohgi of Kuraray Co., Ltd., for kindly providing the PVA sample.

REFERENCES

  1. H. Mbhele, M. G. Salemane, C. G. C. van Sittert, J. M. Nedeljkovic, V. Djokovic and A. S. Luyt, “Study of Sago Starch-CdS Nanocomposite Films: Fabrication, Structure, Optical and Thermal Properties,” Chemistry of Materials, Vol. 15, No. 26, 2003, pp. 5019-5024. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cm034505a
  2. G. Johnsy, K. K. R. Datta, V. A. Sajeevkumar, S. N. Sabapathy, A. S. Bawa and M. Eswaramoorthy, “Direct Assembly of Photoresponsive C60-Gold Nanoparticle Hybrid Films,” Applied Materials & Interfaces, Vol. 1, No. 12, 2009, pp. 2796-2803. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/am9005226
  3. X. Zhao, Q. Zhang and D. Chen, “Direct Assembly of Photoresponsive C60-Gold Nanoparticle Hybrid Films,” Macromolecules, Vol. 43, No. 5, 2010, pp. 2357-2363. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ma902862u
  4. X. Zhang, T. Liu, T. V. Sreekumur, S. Kumar, V. C. Moore and R. H. Hauge, “Smalley Poly(vinyl alcohol)/SWNT Composite Film E,” Nano Letters, Vol. 3, No. 9, 2003, pp. 1285-1288. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/nl034336t
  5. S. Morimune, M. Kotera, T. Nishino, K. Goto and K. Hata, “Poly(vinyl alcohol)/Graphene Oxide Nanocomposites Prepared by a Simple Eco-Process,” Macromolecules, Vol. 44, No. 11, 2011, pp. 4415-4421. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ma200176r
  6. P. Podsiadlo, A. K. Kaushik, B. S. Shim, A. Agarwal, Z. Tang, A. M. Waas and E. M. J. Arruda, “Can Nature’s Design Be Improved upon High Strength, Transparent Nacre-Like Nanocomposites with Double Network of Sacrificial Cross Links,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, Vol. 112, No. 46, 2008, pp. 14359-14363. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp801492n
  7. K. E. Prasad, B. Das, U. Maitra, U. Ramamurty and C. N. R. Rao, “Extraordinary Synergy in the Mechanical Properties of Polymer Matrix Composites Reinforced with 2 Nanocarbons,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, Vol. 106, No. 32, 2009, pp. 13186- 13189. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0905844106
  8. M. V. Konidari, K. G. Papadokostaki and M. Sanopoulou, “Moisture-Induced Effects on the Tensile Mechanical Properties and Glass-Transition Temperature of Poly(vinyl alcohol) Films,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, Vol. 120, No. 6, 2011, pp. 3381-3386. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/app.33118
  9. N. A. Peppas, “Turbidimetric Studies of Aqueous Poly(vinyl alcohol) Solutions,” Macromolecular Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 176, No. 11, 1975, pp. 3433-3440. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/macp.1975.021761125
  10. C. M. Hassan and N. A. Peppas, “Structure and Applications of Poly(vinyl alcohol) Hydrogels Produced by Conventional Crosslinking or by Freezing/Thawing Methods,” Advances in Polymer Science, Vol. 153, 2000, pp. 37-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46414-X_2
  11. V. I. Lozinsky, “Cryotropic Gelation of Poly(vinyl alcohol) Solutions,” Russian Chemical Reviews, Vol. 67, No. 7, 1998, pp. 573-586. http://dx.doi.org/10.1070/RC1998v067n07ABEH000399
  12. V. I. Lozinsky, I. Y. Galaev, F. M. Plieva, I. N. Savina, H. Jungvid and B. Mattiasson, “Polymeric Cryogels as Promising Materials of Biotechnological Interest,” Trends in Biotechnology, Vol. 21, No. 10, 2003, pp. 445-451. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2003.08.002
  13. R. Ricciawdi, F. Auriemma, C. De Rosa and F. Laupretre, “X-Ray Diffraction Analysis of Poly(vinyl alcohol) Hydrogels, Obtained by Freezing and Thawing Techniques,” Macromolecules, Vol. 37, No. 5, 2004, pp. 1921-1927. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ma035663q
  14. R. Ricciardi, F. Auriemma, C. Gaillet, C. De Rosa and F. Laupretre, “Investigation of the Crystallinity of Freeze/ Thaw Poly(vinyl alcohol) Hydrogels by Different Techniques,” Macromolecules, Vol. 37, No. 25, 2004, pp. 9510- 9516. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ma048418v
  15. R. Ricciardi, G. Mangiapia, F. Lo Celso, L. Paduano, R. Triolo, F. Auriemma, C. De Rosa and F. Laupretre, “Evolution of PVA Gels Prepared without Crosslinking Agents as a Cell Adhesive Surface,” Chemistry of Materials, Vol. 17, No. 5, 2005, pp. 1183-1189. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cm048632y
  16. T. Nakaoki and H. Yamashita, “Coagulation Dimension of Freezable Bound Solvent in Isotactic Polypropylene/oDichlorobenzene Gel,” Journal of Molecular Structure, Vol. 875, No. 1-3, 2008, pp. 282-287. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2007.04.040
  17. T. Nakano and T. Nakaoki, “Coagulation Size of Freezable Water in Poly(vinyl alcohol) Hydrogels Formed by Different Freeze/Thaw Cycle Periods,” Polymer Journal, Vol. 43, 2011, pp. 875-880. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/pj.2011.92
  18. P. J. Willcox, D. W. Howie, K. Shimidt-Rohr, D. A. Hoagland, S. P. Gido, S. Pudjijanto, L. W. Kleiner and S. J. Venkatraman, “Microstructure of Poly(vinyl alcohol) Hydrogels Produced by Freeze/Thaw Cycling,” Journal of Polymer Science Part B, Vol. 37, No. 24, 1999, pp. 3438- 3454. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0488(19991215)37:24<3438::AID-POLB6>3.0.CO;2-9
  19. A. S. Hickey and N. A. Peppas, “Mesh Size and Diffusive Characteristics of Semicrystalline Poly(vinyl alcohol) Membranes Prepared by Freezing/Thawing Techniques,” Journal of Membrane Science, Vol. 107, No. 3, 1995, pp. 229- 237. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0376-7388(95)00119-0
  20. R. Hernandez, A. Sarafian, D. Lopez and C. Mijangos, “Structure of Poly(vinyl alcohol) Cryo-Hydrogels as Studied by Proton Low-Field NMR Spectroscopy,” Polymer, Vol. 46, 2004, pp. 5543-5550.

NOTES

*Corresponding author.