Applied Mathematics, 2011, 2, 685-693
doi:10.4236/am.2011.26090 Published Online June 2011 (http://www.SciRP.org/journal/am)
Copyright © 2011 SciRes. AM
Soliton Resonances of the Nonisospectral Modified
Kadomtsev-Petviashvili Equation
Jiaojiao Yan
Zhejiang Institute of Communications, Hangzhou, China
E-mail: yanjj@zjvtit.edu.com
Received March 24, 20 1 1; revised April 2, 2011; accepted April 5, 2011
Abstract
Many equations possess soliton resonances phenomenon, this paper studies the soliton resonances of the
nonisospectral modified Kadomtsev-Petviashvili (mKP) equation by asymptotic analysis.
Keywords: Soliton, Resonances, Hirota Bilinear Method, Nonisospectral mKP Equation
1. Introduction
In the process of searching for explicit solutions, quite a
few systematic methods have been developed, such as
inverse scattering transformation [1], Darboux transfor-
mations [2], Hirota’s bilinear method [3-5], and so on.
Among them, the bilinear method first proposed by Hi-
rota provides us with a comprehensive approach to con-
struct exact solutions of nonlinear evolution equations
(NEEs). Meanwhile, as the interacting of the solution,
soliton resonance has been studied in many papers. Miles
obtained resonantly interacting solitary waves of KP
equation [6], these solutions are coherent structures that
describe the diffraction of a soliton at a corner, and sug-
gest that, under certain conditions, a KP soliton can’t
turn at a convex corner without separating or otherwise
losing its identity. Thus, these structures provide a solu-
tion of the problem of “Mach reflection” in water waves,
and this phenomenon is now known as soliton resonance.
Asymptotic analysis is a very important tool in studying
the behaviors of soliton solu tions, we call the asymptotic
line soliton solutions as and as the
incoming and outgoing line soliton solutions, respec-
tively. The amplitudes, directions and even the number
of incoming solitons are in general different from those
of the outgoing ones, wh en resonance occurs two soliton
solutions under certain condition resonate and create a
new soliton solutio n.
y y
Multisoliton solutions exhibiting nontrivial spatial
structures and interaction patterns were found in many
well-known soliton equations. Hirota studied resonances
of solitons in one-dimensional space theoretically taking
the Sawada-Kotera equation with a nonvanishing bound-
ary condition as an example by his bilinear method [7],
in which he pointed out that two solitons at the resonant
state fused after colliding with each other, or a soliton
splited into two solitons. Other (1 + 1)-dimensional space
equations like KdV-SK and Hirota-Satsuma equations [8]
and Boussinesq equation [9].
However more emphases are placed on (2 + 1)-dimen-
sional ones, the most relevant with ours like the follow-
ing: Wadati clarified the fundamental properties of the
soliton in KP equation [1 0], Medina then went further in
this equation [11], Pashaev created four virtual soliton
resonance solution for KP-II [12], Biondini made use of
tau-function in Wronskian to study it [13], after that Iso-
jima studied the parameter regions for resonance and
also study the “spider web”-like solution for cKP system
[14,15], the approach of the Reference [16] for MKP-II
equation allows audiences to interpret the resonance
soliton as a composite object of two dissipative solitons
in (1 + 1) dimensions, Hao investigated the resonance of
two line solitons of the nonisospectral KP equation [17]
which classified the resonance condition clearly. Reso-
nance can also occur in (3 + 1)-dimensional system [18]
and even multi-dimensional space [19,20].
In recent years, much attention has been paid to the
study of nonisospectral systems [21], as nonisospectral
evolution equations are of physical and mathematical
importance, which can b e used to describe solitary waves
in a certain type of non-uniform media with a relaxation
effect. The aim of this paper is to clarify the fundamental
properties of the soliton resonances in the (2 + 1)-dimen-
sional nonisospectral mKP equation
J. J. YAN
686
y

211
21
4663
230
txxx xxyy
yy
uyuuuu uu
xu uu


 (1.1)
whose Wronskian and Grammian type solutions have
been studied by Deng [22 ] and Zhang [23] respectiv ely.
This letter is organized as follows: in Section 2, the 2-
and 3-soliton so lution of Equation (1 .1) will be presented
using Hirota’s bilinear method. Then 2- and 3-soliton
resonances will be studied in Sections 3 and 4 respec-
tively. Finally, concluding remarks are given in Section
5.
2. 2- and 3-Soliton Solutions of the
Nonisospectral mKP Equation
Through the transformation log
x
g
u
f


, Equation (1.1)
can be transformed into the bilinear form
20
yx
Dg fDg f  (2.1a)

3
43
20
txxy
yxx
Dg fyD g fDDgf
xDgf gf gf
 
 (2.1b)
where D is the well-known Hirota bilinear operator

 
,,,,
,,
lmn
xyt
lm
DD Dab
n
x
xyy tt
axytbxyt x
xyytt

 
 


If we note the N-soliton sol ution as log N
NN
x
g
uf


ljl
ljl
A
A
N
1
,
12
,
and


0,111
0,111
exp log,
exp log,
N
Njjjj
jjl
N
Njjjj
jjl
gb
fa
 
 
 
 







 
 
(2.2)
where the sum is taken over all possible combinations of
, then the first three soliton
solutions are
 
0,1 1,2,,
jj

1
1111
1e, 1egafb
 (2.3a)
12 12
12 1212
21212
21212
1e ee
1e ee,
gaaaa
fbbbb
 
 
 
 
(2.3b)
13 13
12 1212
23231 2 3121323
13 13
12 1212
23231 2 31213
3
31231213
23 123
3
312312 13
23 123
1e eeee
ee,
1e eeee
ee
gaaaaa aa
aa aaa
fbbbbbbb
bb bbb

 
 

 
 


 
 
--
--
++
+
++
++ 23 ,
,
(2.3c)
where


13
ijij
ij
ijji
kkqq
Ai
kqkq


 ,j
22 , e,
iiiiiii
kqxk qy
i

 
ij
e0A

ij
, and i
,,,
iiii
kqab
are all functions
corresponding to t, which satisfy the following disper-
sion relations:


22
,,
,
11
,,,
22
1, 1,2,3.
4
itiitiiiii
itii i
kkq qaqbk
qk i

,
 
 
What’s more, in order to avoid the divergence of u, we
suppose i
f
and i
g
are all positive. Let iii
kq
and ii
kq i
, then i
can be rewritten as
ii i
xyi

 and without lose of generality we
suppose
j
ij

i.
3. 2-Solitons
In general, a soliton is observed when the following two
conditions are satisfied:
1) Two terms of Equation (2.3b) are so large that other
two terms are neglected.
2) Under the condition 1), the large two terms are of
the same order. Under these two conditions, the peak of
the soliton is on the line tan
icons t
.
3.1. Pure 2-Soliton
When 0i
A
 and 1
, for the limit ,
12
y
the condition 1) and 2) are satisfied in two re-
gions:

1
1
11212
11212
1112
1
(2) 11212
112
1e
log, 0,
1e
ee
log, ,
ee
a
ux
b
aaa
ux
bbb









 

12

 


(3.1)
so when, . As
y
 
1
uu u
2
11212212
11212212
112 2
112 2
ee 1e
loglog ,
ee 1e
x
x
aaa a
bbb b
 
 
 
 





Copyright © 2011 SciRes. AM
J. J. YAN
Copyright © 2011 SciRes. AM
687
we will use the simplified for later convenience.
Similarly, when, ,
y
112 2
112 2
1
12
1e 1e
log log
1e 1e
2
x
x
a
ubb









a
Above all, both
of them have four arms and displays the regular interac-
tion, that means two soliton solutions maintain their
original amplitudes and velocities during the interaction
(See Figure 1).
3.2. Soliton Resonances
When 12, or 12 , the phase shift 0A A 12
,
becomes , the length of the intermediate region be-
comes infinite, this may be thought as “soliton reso-
nance”, and the dispersion relation plays a major role in
producing the soliton resonance. Further more, as
 Figure 1. Pure 2-soliton solution.
12
11 1
1221 122121 212
1e eeAgaAaAaaA 12

 
  (3.5)


121 2 12
121 22 1
0,
0
Akkqq
Akqkq

  
0
(3.2) by taking , Equation (3.5 ) becomes
12 0A
12 1
21 212
ee egaaaa2


2
(3.6a)
Similarly
we call them as “minus resonance” and “plus resonance”
respectively. 12 1
21 212
ee efb bbb

 
1
e
(3.6a)
The above substitutio ns are nothing but only a transla-
tion of the coordinates.
3.2.1. Min u s Res o nance
Case 1. By taking 12 , Equation (2.3b) becomes
212
0A
12
ea1ega
 , 1
212
1e efbb The corresponding asymptotic forms are Equati on (3.7).
2
 , from which
we have the asymptotic forms (see Equation (3.3)). The solution has three arms again.
The solution has three arms each of which are exact
1-solitons. 3.2.2. Plus R esonance
Case 1. Substituting 12
1
1
eA
into Equation (2.3 b),
then taking we get
12
A
Case 2. Substituting
112
11
21222122
1
12 12
,,
ee,e 2
1
e
g
Agf Af
AA
 



(3.4) 21
21
2212
2212
1e e
1e e
gaaa
fbbb


 
 
2
2
,
(3.8)
into Equatio n (2.4b), get



1
1
2
1
12
12
1112
1
2212
1
12 12 12
12
1e
log, ,0,
1e
1e
log, ,,0.
1e
ee
log, ,,
ee
x
x
x
a
uy
b
a
uu y
b
aa
uy
ba










 








(3.3)



2
2
2
1
12
12
2212
2
111122
1
12 12 12
12
1e
log, ,,0
1e
1e
log, ,,.
1e
ee
log, ,,
ee
x
x
x
a
uy
b
a
uu y
b
aa
uy
ba










 



   



(3.7)
J. J. YAN
688

 
12
12
12
12
12 12 12 2
12
12 12
12
12
12
1e
log, ,0,
1e
,0,
1e 1e
loglog, ,0
1e 1e
x
xx
aa
uy
bb
uy
aa
uu bb












 

 
 
 

 

2
e
(3.9)
Case 2. Substituting 2
1
12
eA
into (2.3b), then taking we get
12
A
1121
21122112
1ee, 1eegaaa fbbb
12

  (3.10)
 

12
12
12
12
12 12
12
12
12
12 12 112
12
,0,
1e 1e
loglo g, ,0
1e 1e
1e
log, ,,0
1e
xx
x
y
aa
uu bb
uaa
uy
bb







 
 

 
  

 

 


--
+-+
(3.11)
The above asymptotic analysis discusses the 2-soliton
solution and it’s two type of resonances, minus reso-
nance and plus resonance, by which we know that they
all possess three arms, this theory can be illustrated by
Figure 2, and furthermore, they show that when reso-
nance occurs, interaction of two high and steep waves
can produce a new weak one.
We have assumed that 12
, the case of 12
12
is
similar, however it is different in the case of
. Let
1
x
yZ

, then


111222
2
12
12 2
12
, ,ZZ
A



 
(3.12)
where two soliton lie in parallel, this solution is similar
to 2-soliton solution of the KdV equation.
4. 3-Solitons
In this section, we analyze the behaviors in asymptotic
regions about typical four types of solutions.
When and , for the limit
123
12 1323
0,,AAA1
,
y

 , the condition 1) and 2) are satis-
fied in three regions:



1
212
212
3
3
111
1
12 3
22
2
12123
331323
31323
1e
log,
1e
0,,
1e
log,
1e
,,
1e
log,
1e
x
x
x
a
ub
a
ub
a
ub
 











 




1231
,,

  
3
3
u
(4.1)
so when .
  
12
,yuuu 
y
Similarly, when
1
1
2
2
3
3
11312
11312
212
212
3
3
1e
log 1e
1e
log1e
1e
log.
1e
x
x
x
a
ub
a
b
a
a












(4.2)
The above limit analysis can prove that 3-soliton so lu-
tion has 6 arms on theory, Figure 3 can illustrate it too.
The soliton resonance occurs when one or two or even
three of ij
, we call them 1-, 2-, 3-resonance
solution respectively, each of which include minus reso-
nance and plus resonance, in the following, we will dis-
cuss them all.
4.1. 1-Resonance
In this case, one of ij
, we suppose 13

0
A
without lose of generality, that is equal to 13
(minus 1-resonance) and (plus 1-resonance).
13
A
4.1.1. Minus 1-Resonance
Taking the limit of , Equation (2.3c) becomes
13 0A
31
12
23 23
1212
122
23 23
1212
3123
12 23
2123
13 23
1e ee
ee
1e ee
ee
gaaa
aa aa
fbbb
bb bb










 

 

, (4.3)
consequently, the asymptotic forms of the solution are
iven by g
Copyright © 2011 SciRes. AM
J. J. YAN
Copyright © 2011 SciRes. AM
689
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
Figure 2. Minus and plus resonance of 2-soliton solution, (a) 2-soliton minus 1; (b) 2-soliton minus case 2; (c) 2-soliton plus 1;
(d) 2-soliton plus case 2.
 
 

12
12
1223
223 1
32
112
12 12
12
23 3
2
1
2
13 13
1e 1e
log log,
1e 1e
1e
1e
loglog ,
1e
1e
ee
log
12
12
x
x
x
x
aa
uu bb
y
a
a
uu ub
b
y
aa
u












 





 




3
323
112
13
,
ee
x
x
bb






(4.4)
So minus 1-resonance of 2-soliton solution has five
arms (See Figure 4(a)).
4.1.2. Plus 1-Resonance
Taking the limit of , Equation (2 . 3c) becomes
13
A
13 13123 12 1323
131312312 13 23
313 123
313 123
ee
ee
gaa aaa
fbbbbb

 
 
 



21223
212 23
22
2
1e
log .
1e
x
a
uu b
 
 




(4.6)
It is clearly that plus 1-resonance of 2-soliton solution
,
,
(4.5)
Figure 3. Pure 3-soliton solution.
J. J. YAN
690
3
only has one arm, and the figure is similar to that of
1-solition solution.
4.2. 2-Resonance
In this case, two of ij , w e suppose 12,
23 without lose of generality, which are equal
to (minus 2-resonance) and
(plus 2-resonance).





12

12 ,  23
0, 0 
23
 
4.2.1. Plus 2-Resonance
Case 1. Substituting 3
22
12 23
ee, eeAA


12
into
Equation (2.3c), and taking the limit of
A
and 13
A
,
we get
12313
112
12313
112
3112 123
3112123
1e ee
1e ee
ga aaaaa
fbbbbbb
 





 
  (4.7)
Then
  

313
313
21
21
12313
12313
321 3
3
21
21
123 123
123
1e
log 1e
1e 1e
log(log),,
1e 1e
1e
log, .
1e
x
x
x
x
a
uuu b
aa
uy
bb
aaa
uy
bbb



 











 







2
(4.8)
Case 2. Substituting 11 2
12 23
ee,eeAA


12
into
Equation (2.3c), and taking the limit of
A
and 23
A
,
we get
323 123
323123
3323 123
3323 123
1e ee
1e ee
gaaaaaa
fbbb bbb

 


 
 
13
13


, (4.9)
Then
  

32
3
13
1
13
1
12313
12313
321 32
2
3
1
1
123 123
123
1e 1e
loglog 1e
1e
1e
log,
1e
1e
log ,
1e
2
x
x
x
x
aa
uuu b
b
a
u
b
aaa
uy
bbb

 




 












y


2
(4.10)
Case 3. Substituting 2
12 23eeAA
12
into Equation
(2.3c), and taking the limit of
A
and 23
A
, we get
313
1
12313
313
1
12 313
31313
123
313 13
123
1e ee
e
1e ee
e
gaaaa
aaa
fbbbb
bbb

 

 




 
 
Then
 
 
3
3
12 13
12 13
1
1
2313
2313
312 3
3
12
12
1231
1
23
23
1e
log 1e
1e
log,
1e
1e
log 1e
1e
log,
1e
x
x
x
x
a
uu b
aa y
bb
ua
uu b
aa y
bb
























(4.12)
4.2.2. Minus 2-Resonance
In the limit of Equation (2.3c)
can be rewritten as 12 23
0, 0,AA 
313
12
313
12
312313
312313
1e eee
1e eee
gaaaaa
fbbbbb






 
 
13
13
, (4.13)
Then
 
 
3
2
3
2
113
113
313
313
1
1
23 123
23
1
1
31 3
3
1
1
ee
log ee
1e
log,
1e
1e
log 1
1e
log,
1e
x
x
x
x
aa
uu bb
ay
b
ua
uu b
ay
b




















,
(4.14)
The case of condition 12 and
13
,   
13 23
,
  are similar.
By the asymptotic analysis above, we know that two
types of 2-resonance 3-so liton solution possess four arms
(See Figures 4(b)-(d)), the 2-soliton solution has also
four arms, but differently, the behaviors of the former in
the intermediate region are not stationary.
4.3. 3-Resonance
For the plus 3-resonance, substituting 11
12eeA,
3
22
23 13
ee,eeAA
3


12 
into Equation (2.3c), and
taking the limit of , we get
13 23
,,AA A
123
123
3123
3123
1e
1e
gaaa
fbbb





 (4.15)
13
13
(4.11) this case is like 1-soliton solution, which only has one
arm.
For the minus 3-resonance, by taking the limit
Copyright © 2011 SciRes. AM
J. J. YAN
Copyright © 2011 SciRes. AM
691
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
(e) (f)
Figure 4. Minus and plus resonance of 3-soliton solution, (a) 3-soliton minus 1-resonance; (b) 3-soliton plus 2-resonance case
1; (c) 3-soliton plus 2-resonance case 2; (d) 3-soliton plus 2-resonance case 3; (e) 3-soliton minus 2-resonance; (f) 3-soliton
inus 3-resonance. m
J. J. YAN
Copyright © 2011 SciRes. AM
692
12 1323
0, 0,0AAA of the Equation (2.3c),
we have
3
12
3
12
3123
3123
1e ee
1e ee
gaaa
fbbb


 
  (4.16)
Then
 
 
3
3
3
2
3
2
12
12
1
1
3233
3
23
23
12 112
12
1
1
1e
log1e
ee
log,
ee
ee
log ee
1e
log,,
1e
x
x
x
x
a
uu b
aa y
bb
uaa
uu bb
ay
b


















(4.17)
which has f ou r arms (See Figure 4(f)).
5. Conclusions
In this work, we have primarily focused on the asymp-
totic behavior of the $2$- and $3$-soliton solution as
and their interactions in the
.xy
x
y plane.
Generally, in the case of multi-soliton, saying N-soliton
solutions, it has 2
1-, 2-,,-
N
C resonance N-soliton so-
lutions, and all of them have minus and plus ones. The
condition will be more complicated with the increase of
N. A full characterization of interaction patterns of the
general ones is an important open problem, which is left
for further study. It is pointed out that the amplification
of the amplitude has been experimentally observed and
has practical in maritime security and coastal engineering.
It has been found out that many soliton equations have
resonance phenomenon which will be helpful in making
further investigation on the interaction and energy dis-
tribution of gravity waves, and evaluating the impact on
the ship traffic on the surface of water. We expect that
the results presented in this work will be useful to study
solitonic solutions in a variety of integrable systems.
6. Acknowledgements
This work is supported by the National Natural Science
Foundation of China (No 10831003), the Natural Science
Foundation of Zhejiang Province (No Y7080198 and No
R6090109).
7. References
[1] M. J. Ablowitz and P. A. Clarkson, “Solitons, Nonlinear
Evolution Equations and Inverse Scattering,” Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge, 1991.
doi:10.1017/CBO9780511623998
[2] V. B. Matveev and M. A. Salle, “Darboux Transforma-
tion and Solitons,” Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg,
1991.
[3] R. Hirota, “Exact Solution of the Korteweg-de Vries
Equation for Multiple Collisions of Solitons,” Physical
Review Letters, Vol. 27, No. 18, November 1971, pp.
1192-1194. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.27.1192
[4] R. Hirota, “The Direct Method in Soliton Theory,” Cam-
bridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004.
[5] R. Hirota and J. Satsuma, “Nonlinear Evolution Equa-
tions Generated from the Bäcklund Transformation for
the Boussinesq Equation,” Progress of Theoretical Phys-
ics, Vol. 57, No. 3, September 1977, pp. 797-807.
doi:10.1143/PTP.57.797
[6] J. W. Miles, “Resonantly Interacting Solitary Waves,”
Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 79, No. 1, April 1977,
pp. 171-179. doi:10.1017/S0022112077000093
[7] R. Hirota and M. Ito, “Resonance of Solitons in One Di-
mension,” Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, Vol.
52, No. 3, August 1983, pp.744-748.
doi:10.1143/JPSJ.52.744
[8] M. Musette, F. Lambert and J. C. Decuyper, “Soliton and
Antisoliton Resonant Interactions,” Journal of Physics A:
Mathematical and General, Vol. 20, No. 18, December
1987, pp. 2207-2208. doi:10.1088/0305-4470/20/18/022
[9] F. Lambert, M. Musette and E. Kesteloot, “Soliton Reso-
nances for the Good Boussinesq Equation,” Inverse Prob-
lem, Vol. 3, No. 3, May 1987, pp. 275-288.
doi:10.1088/0266-5611/3/2/010
[10] K. Ohkuma and M. Wadati, “The Kadomtsev-Petviashvili
Equation: The Trace Method and the Soliton Reso-
nances,” Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, Vol.
52, No. 3, September 1983, pp. 749-760.
doi:10.1143/JPSJ.52.749
[11] E. Medina, “An $N$ Soliton Resonance Solution for the
KP Equation: Interaction with Change of Form and Ve-
locity,” Letters in Mathematical Physics, Vol. 62, No. 2,
2002, pp. 91-99. doi:10.1023/A:1021647025621
[12] O. K. Pashaev and M. L. Y. Francisco, “Degenerate Four-
Virtual-Soliton Resonance for the KP-II Equation,” Theo-
retical and Mathematical Physics, Vol. 144, No. 1, 2005,
pp. 1022-1029. doi:10.1007/s11232-005-0130-x
[13] G. Biondini and S. Chakravarty, “Soliton Solutions of the
Kadomtsev-Petviashvili II Equation,” Journal of Mathe-
matical Physics, Vol. 47, No. 3, February 2006, pp. 1-26.
doi:10.1063/1.2181907
[14] S. Isojima, R. Willox and J. Satsuma, “On Various Solu-
tions of the Coupled KP Equation,” Journal of Physics A:
Mathematical and General, Vol. 35, No. 32, May 2002,
pp. 6893-6909. doi:10.1088/0305-4470/35/32/309
[15] S. Isojima, R. Willox and J. Satsuma, “Spider-Web Solu-
tions of the Coupled KP Equation,” Journal of Physics A:
Mathematical and General, Vol. 36, No. 36, June 2003,
pp. 9533-9552. doi:10.1088/0305-4470/36/36/307
J. J. YAN693
[16] J. H. Lee, R. Willox and O. K. Pashaev, “Soliton Reso-
nances for the MKP-II,” Theoretical and Mathematical
Physics, Vol. 144, No. 1, July 2005, pp. 995-1003.
doi:10.1007/s11232-005-0127-5
[17] H. H. Hao and D. J. Zhang, “Resonances of Line Solitons
in a Non-Isospectral Kadomtsev-Petviashvili Equation,”
Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, Vol. 77, April
2008, Paper ID: 045001. doi:10.1143/JPSJ.77.045001
[18] L. M. Alonso, E. L. Medina and R. Hernandez, “Multi-
dimensional Localized Coherent Structures in the Bilin-
ear Formalism of Integrable Systems,” Inverse Problem,
Vol. 7, No. 3, June 1991, p. L25.
doi:10.1088/0266-5611/7/3/001
[19] F. Kaka and N. Yajima, “Interaction of Ion-Acoustic
Solitons in Two-Dimensional Space,” Physical Society of
Japan, Vol. 49, November 1980, pp. 2063-2071.
doi:10.1143/JPSJ.49.2063
[20] F. Kaka and N. Yajima, “Interaction of Ion-Acoustic
Solitons in Multi-Dimensional Space II,” Physical Soci-
ety of Japan, Vol. 51, January 1982, pp. 311-322.
doi:10.1143/JPSJ.51.311
[21] Y. Zhang, S. F. Deng, D. J. Zhang and D. Y. Chen, “The
N-Soliton Solutions for the Non-Isospectral Mkdv Equa-
tion,” Vol. 339, No. 3-4, August 2004, pp. 228-236.
[22] S. F. Deng, “The Multisoliton Solutions for the Noniso-
spectral mKP Equation,” Physics Letters A, Vol. 372, No.
4, January 2008, pp. 460-464.
doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2007.07.060
[23] Y. Zhang and Y. N. Lv, “On the Nonisospectral Modified
Kadomtsev-Peviashvili Equation,” Journal of Mathe-
matical Analysis and Applications, Vol. 342, No. 1, June
2008, pp. 534-541. doi:10.1016/j.jmaa.2007.12.032
Copyright © 2011 SciRes. AM