Journal of Modern Physics
Vol.07 No.15(2016), Article ID:71865,10 pages
10.4236/jmp.2016.715178

Characteristics of GaN Thin Films Using Magnetron Sputtering System

Hasina F. Huq, Rocio Y. Garza, Roman Garcia-Perez

Electrical Engineering, University of Texas Pan American, Edinburg, USA

Copyright © 2016 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY 4.0).

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Received: January 23, 2016; Accepted: November 6, 2016; Published: November 9, 2016

ABSTRACT

The paper presents a polycrystalline GaN thin film with a hexagonal wurtzite structure under the optimized sputtering conditions of 40 W RF power, 5 mT working pressure, using pure nitrogen gas with a substrate temperature of 700˚C. The study examines the effects of surface disorders and incorporates it in the thin films characteristics. A radio frequency (RF) Ultra High Vacuum (UHV) Magnetron Sputtering System has been used for the deposition of Gallium Nitride (GaN) on silicon, sapphire and glass substrates with different parameters. The power is varied from 40 W to 50 W, and the pressure from 4 mT to 15 mT. The effects of the RF sputtering powers and gas pressures on the structural properties are investigated experimentally. Sputtering at a lower RF power of 15 W does increase the N atomic percentage, however the deposition rate is substantially slower and the films are amorphous. GaN deposited on both silicon and sapphire wafer resulted in thin films close to stoichiometric once the N2 concentration is 60% or higher. It is also observed that the substrate cooling/heating effects improve the quality of the thin films with fewer defects present at the surface of the GaN epi-structure.

Keywords:

GaN, UHV Magnetron Sputtering, RF Power, HEMT, Thin Film Characterization

1. Introduction

The need for concise and accurate growth of GaN thin films on a specific substrate with a specific doping is greatly emerging for the biosensor applications [1] [2] . Surfaces and interfaces are an integral part of GaN High Electron Mobility Transistors (HEMTs). Disorders on the interfacial planes are quite important in GaN HEMTs. The effects of spontaneous and piezoelectric polarization induced charges at the AlGaN/GaN hetero- interface also play an important role in the characterization of HEMT devices for biosensor application.

In addition, GaN HEMTs also have a high resistance to chemical corrosion by acids, have non-toxicity to living cells, allow extreme sensing environments, and are chemically inert [3] [4] , making them suitable biosensors. Early research has shown great potential for AlGaN/GaN HEMTs as biosensors where silicon (Si)-based Field Effect Transistors (FETs) have been ineffective [5] .

Although GaN HEMTs have shown to be suitable transistors, they have not been popularized due to fabrication issues. Growing high quality GaN has been a main challenge as this material does not exist purely in nature [6] [7] . Most of the fabrication processes are not suitable for sensitive electronic applications as they are complex, involve corrosive materials, and require high temperature depositions [8] . In the present work, we extend the research by investigating optimized sputtering conditions of GaN and AlGaN, for the purpose of preparing an AlGaN/GaN heterostructure by RF magnetron sputter technique. This leads to the fabrication of an AlGaN/GaN HEMT biosensor (Figure 1).

2. Methodology

The sputter grown GaN thin films are preferred because of the ease of operation, thickness control, low temperature deposition, sequential deposition of different films, and less toxicity [9] . Although sputtering of GaN has not yet been fully explored, sputtering of GaN has achieved polycrystalline and single crystal GaN by sputtering of a GaN target [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] , a gallium (Ga) target [15] [16] [17] , and GaN powder target [18] [19] [20] .

Utilizing an Ultra High Vacuum (UHV) Magnetron Sputtering System, GaN films have been deposited by radio-frequency (RF, 13.5 MHz) magnetron sputtering with a GaN target. Four sets of GaN thin films are deposited on silicon, sapphire and glass substrates. The first set of sample is deposited in Ar gas; the second set of sample is deposited in mixed Ar and N2 gas (where the ratio of Ar is higher than N2); the third set of sample is deposited in mixed N2 and Ar gas (where the ratio of N2 is higher than Ar); the fourth set of sample is deposited in N2 gas. Finally, substrate heating is used to reduce incorporation of oxygen impurities during the deposition process. The base pressure is below 3 × 10−6 Torr, and the working pressure for all synthesis is above 3 × 10−3 Torr. Prior to sputtering, a pre-sputtering process is performed for more than 30 min

Figure 1. Overall research outline.

to eliminate any contaminants from the target. Sputtering is then conducted with varying RF power of GaN target from 15 W to 50 W. The substrate temperature is varied from 25˚C to 700˚C. Substrates are rotated at 30 - 60 RPM during deposition to enhance film uniformity. Imaging tools such as the Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM), Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDAX), X-ray Diffractometer (XRD), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) are used to characterize each sample.

3. Results

GaN thin films samples are made using the magnetron sputtering system under various conditions. Sputtering with pure argon gas under 40 W - 50 W RF power and low pressure (4 mT - 5 mT) has resulted in dark shade films that are highly nitrogen (N) deficient with an average ratio of 0.16 N/Ga for all four samples. Table 1 shows the characteristics of sputtering method using pure argon gas. The darker shades are attributed to high concentrations of Ga, as is discussed in [18] . EDS spectrum revealed impurities of oxygen (O) and carbon (C), which are attributed to impurities. Further XPS analysis indicated that C is only found at the surface of the thin films (Figure 2).

The effects of various concentrations of sputtering gas on the deposition resulted in

Table 1. Characteristics of sputtering using pure argon gas.

Figure 2. X-ray photoelectron spectra depicting the carbon within the sputtered films (in the surface layer).

an improvement on the N/Ga ratio as well as reduced target poisoning as the sputtering gas has a higher concentration (60% or higher) of N2. Table 2 shows the different characteristics of each film. The experimental results show that the optimized sputtering power is 40 W RF power. When sputtering with 50 W RF power, target poisoning is observed at low pressures. To reduce the effect of target poisoning, higher pressures (20 mT - 30 mT) have to be used. However, at these pressures, there is still a lack of N in the film. The deposition rate is substantially slower and the films are amorphous when sputtering at a lower RF power of 15 W. It does increase the N atomic percentage.

Sputtering with 40 W RF power and 10 mT pressure, XRD spectra revealed weak crystallization at 36.7 beginning to form, however the film eventually becomes amorphous if the nitrogen concentration is lower than 60%, Figure 3. This is attributed to the intense ion bombardment from the argon gas, causing a re-sputtering at the surface of the thin film. This is also observed in [18] .

Comparing the SEM surface images taken of the GaN films sputtered using 40% N2 for 1 hr vs 2 hrs, showed small grains (~15 nm) are visible initially, and over time (2 hrs) the grains become less defined, Figure 4. Additionally, target poisoning is still observed when sputtering at 40% N2 or lower. The effect is greatly reduced at low powers and higher pressures. GaN deposited on both silicon and sapphire wafer resulted in thin films close to stoichiometric once the N2 concentration is 60% or higher.

The characteristics of the films deposited on the sapphire wafer are shown on Table 3.

Table 2. Characteristics of sputtering using various concentration of N2 and argon.

Figure 3. Depositions of 1) 33% N2 1 hr, 2) 40% N2 1 hr and 3) 40% N2 2 hrs.

Figure 4. SEM surface image of GaN films with sputtering parameters.

Table 3. Characteristics of sputtering using various concentrations of N2 and argon gas on sapphire wafer.

The 15 W RF power proved to be inefficient due to a reduction in sputtering rate, making it unpractical. In addition, although the N/Ga increased, the films are amorphous. The amorphous state of the film could be due to insufficient time given during sputtering for the film to grow and get passed the nucleation phase.

The biggest factor affecting the depositions is the atomic percentage of oxygen incorporated in the film during deposition. Even though close to stoichiometric films are produced when sputtering with 60% N2 and an RF power of 40 W, there is still a high concentration of oxygen.

The incorporation of oxygen is concluded to be from impurities already incorporated into the gas chamber. To reduce the oxygen levels in the films, the substrate temperature is utilized. The effect of the high temperature deposition results in polycrystalline films, with a significant reduction in oxygen. Table 4 shows the characteristics of sputtering under 40 W RF power and 5 mT pressure using a substrate temperature of 400˚C or 700˚C. With 400˚C on the silicon and the sapphire substrates, the oxygen levels are greatly reduced and weak crystallization is observed.

Increasing the substrate temperature to 700˚C significantly reduces the oxygen and the film is mostly compost of gallium and nitrogen. XRD pattered showed polycrystalline thin film with wurtzite GaN of mixed orientations (100, 002, 101, 110, and 103) with a preferred orientation of GaN (002) on both silicon and sapphire, Figure 5. SEM surface images taken of the depositions revealed grain sizes of 40 nm - 38 nm grains on silicon and 62 nm - 39 nm on sapphire, Figure 6. XPS analysis showed the impurities of oxygen in each of the thin films. The oxygen is only less than Ga when no N2 is used. Figure 7 shows the effects of temperature on depositions. The oxygen levels have been controlled significantly at elevated temperatures.

One of the major challenges is the target poisoning during the sputtering. When sputtering with pure argon gas and low pressures, target poisoning is greatly observed, Once the pressure is increased to 20 mT, the effect begins to be reduced. The introducing of N2, positively affects the conditions of the target.

However, sputtering at 50 W RF power still creates the effect at low pressures. When sputtering with 40 W RF power and high pressure of 10 mT, the effect is suppressed but not completely reduced. Once the process gas is 60% or higher N2, sputtering can be done at low or high pressures. The optimized conditions are an RF power of 40 W or

Table 4. Characteristics of sputtering using different substrate temperatures

Figure 5. X-ray diffraction patters of GaN films; 40 RF power, 5 mT pressure and 700˚C temperature.

Figure 6. SEM surface images of sputtered GaN thin films. 40 RF power and 5 mT pressure using 700˚C substrate temperature, grain sizes of 62 nm - 39 nm on sapphire wafer.

Figure 7. Bar graphs depicting the atomic percentage of oxygen vs gallium; Atomic percentage of oxygen vs gallium using temperatures of 400˚C and 700˚C on Si and Al2O3 wafers.

Table 5. Characteristics of sputtering using different substrate temperatures.

below with a pressure between 10 mT and 20 mT. Sputtering at a low pressure (5 mT) is possible once these conditions are met, however some target poisoning is still observed. However, this effect is minimal and sputtering can be carried out without affecting the deposition. A similar phenomenon is observed in [18] , were target poisoning is observed at the surface of the substrate where a re-sputtering of the deposited film is observed when sputtering at high powers and low pressures, leaving the film N deficient. This is likely due to inadequate sputtering conditions that cause re-sputtering to happen at the surface, resulting in the surface of the target decomposing and losing nitrogen.

Table 5 shows the characteristics of the target poisoning on the ratio of the N/Ga. These depositions are done sequentially starting from the top down. In the first depositions, sputtering at low pressures (4 - 5 mT), the target is mostly black and the N/Ga ratios are really low. After sputtering at adequate conditions of 40 W RF power and 10 mT pressure, the target is now mostly clean, and the deposition done after at 40 W RF power and 5 mT pressure had an increase in the N/Ga ratio. This proves that the cleanliness of the target is important as it has a great effect on the stoichiometry.

4. Conclusion

In this study, a middle-frequency magnetron-sputtering method is adopted to deposit GaN on Si (111), Sapphire and glass substrates. Experimental results revealed that polycrystalline GaN thin film with a hexagonal GaN wurtzite structure is grown on silicon and sapphire wafers. Glass substrate is not suitable for GaN. In addition, oxygen

impurities incorporated during the deposition are shown to be reduced by using temperature depositions. The samples are made with various parameters. The deposition rate of the films is observed. The study showed that the high quality crystal of the GaN thin films depend strongly on the low power (~40 W), high gas pressure (~15 mT) and annealing effects. This is comparable as in [19] where films deposited on both single crystal and amorphous substrates had the same orientation due to RF magnetron sputtering being almost free of tangential growth. Best deposition parameters are achieved at low powers and high pressures, with the addition of 60% N2 gas or higher, enhancing the incorporation of nitrogen on to the thin film, and increasing the average N/Ga ratio to achieve stoichiometry. Otherwise, the argon ions have enough energy to re-sputter at the surface of the thin film, leaving them nitrogen deficient. Additionally, target poisoning is created under inadequate sputtering conditions and decreases as the nitrogen gas percentage increases.

Acknowledgements

This project is supported in part by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under Grant No. 1229523, and by the US Army Research Office W911NF-14-1-0100.

Cite this paper

Huq, H.F., Garza, R.Y. and Garcia-Perez, R. (2016) Characteristics of GaN Thin Films Using Magnetron Sputtering System. Journal of Modern Phy- sics, 7, 2028-2037. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2016.715178

References

  1. 1. Culbertson, L. (2014) Wide Bandgap Semiconductors Go Beyond Silicon in Power, RF, LED Lighting, and Optoelectronics. Mouser Electronics.
    http://www.mouser.com/applications/

  2. 2. Callister, W.D. (2007) Materials Science and Engineering: An Introduction. 7th Edition, John Wiley & Sons, New York.

  3. 3. Shur, M. and Davis, R.F. (2004) GaN-Based Materials and Devices: Growth, Fabrication, Characterization and Performance. World Scientific, Singapore.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/5539

  4. 4. Fan, R., Pearton, S.J., Kang, B.S. and Chu, B.H. (2011) AlGaN/GaN High Electron Mobility Transistor Based Sensors for Bio-Applications. In: Serra, P.A., Ed., Biosensors for Health, Environment and Biosecurity, InTech.

  5. 5. Kang, B.S., Wang, H.T., Ren, F. and Pearton, S.J. (2008) Journal of Applied Physics, 104, Article ID: 031101.

  6. 6. Pearton, S.J., Abernathy, C.R. and Ren, F. (2006) Gallium Nitride Processing for Electronics, Sensors and Spintronics. Springer, London.

  7. 7. Ohring, M. (2002) Materials Science of Thin Films: Deposition and Structure. 2nd Edition, Academic, San Diego.

  8. 8. Chandra, S., Bhatt, V. and Singh, R. (2009) Sadhana, 34, 543-556.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12046-009-0032-y

  9. 9. Bhatt, V., Chandra, S., Kumar, S. and Rauthan, C.M. (2007) Indian Journal of Pure and Applied Physics, 45, 377-381.

  10. 10. Wang, C.-W., Soong, B.-S., Chen, J.-Y., Chen, C.-L. and Su, Y.-K. (2000) Journal of Applied Physics, 88, 6355-6358.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1324700

  11. 11. Kim, H.W. and Kim, N.H. (2004) Applied Surface Science, 236, 192-197.

  12. 12. Kim, J.H., Davidson, M.R. and Holloway, P.H. (2003) Applied Physics Letters, 83, 4746-4748.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1627471

  13. 13. Kim, J.H. and Cho, K.Y. (2013) Journal of the Korean Physical Society, 62, 619-622.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.3938/jkps.62.619

  14. 14. Devaraju, G., Pathak, P.A., Rao, N.S., Saikiran, V., Rao, S.V.S. and Titov, A.I. (2012) Radiation Effects & Defects in Solids, 167, 659-665.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10420150.2012.688204

  15. 15. Miyazaki, T., Takada, K. and Adachi, S. (2005) Journal of Applied Physics, 97, Article ID: 093516.

  16. 16. Miyazaki, T., Fujimaki, T. and Sadao, A. (2001) Journal of Applied Physics, 89, 8316-8320.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1368393

  17. 17. Zou, C.W., Yin, M.L., Li, M., Liu, C.S., Guo, L.P. and Fu, D.J. (2008) Thin Solid Films, 517, 670-673.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2008.07.038

  18. 18. Maruyama, T. and Miyake, H. (2006) Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology, 24, 1096.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1116/1.2208988

  19. 19. Blaut-Blachev, A.N. (2000) Semiconductors, 35, 688-689.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1134/1.1379405

  20. 20. Horng, R.H., Wuu, D.S., Wei, S.C., Chan, S.H. and Kung, C.Y. (1999) Thin Solid Films, 343-344, 642-645.