Open Journal of Rheumatology and Autoimmune Diseases
Vol.04 No.04(2014), Article ID:51147,8 pages

Assessment of Knowledge and Attitude in a Sample of Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Its Association with Disease Activity and Severity: A Cross-Sectional Study

Sami Salman1, Ahmad SAlnuaimi2, Nizar Abdul Lateef1, Rana Kadhum1

1Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq

2Community Medicine Department, College of Medicine, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq


Copyright © 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).

Received 24 August 2014; revised 24 September 2014; accepted 24 October 2014


Background: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic and disabling disease that has a major impact on the lives of patients. Objectives: To test the patients’ knowledge about their disease, its treatment, its complications, and if this affects severity of the disease as measured by the disease activity index (DAS 28). Patients and Methods: A sample of 100 patients with RA who met the Criteria of American College of Rheumatology for RA agreed to participate in this study over the period September 2011-March 2012. Patients’ data were obtained by personal interview. The questionnaire included demographic characteristics and the patients’ knowledge about their disease. The disease activity was measured using standard (DAS28). Results: Thirty three percent of the patients didn’t have an idea about their disease, 20% didn’t know the reason for the investigations, 49% didn’t know the treatment and 40% didn’t know the side effects of their medications. Most patients had a high disease activity index, and there was a poor correlation between patients’ educational level and the disease activity. Conclusions: Neither the educational level nor the frequency of hospital admissions had effects on the knowledge about this disease. As most patients had a high disease activity, a better knowledge may improve disease control and prevent complications.


Rheumatoid Arthritis, Disease Burden, Disease Awareness, Patient’s Education, Patient’s Knowledge, Socio-Economic Factors, Disease Activity Index

1. Introduction

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune disease that causes inflammation and deformity of the joints. Systemic problems may also develop, vasculitis, development of nodules (rheumatoid nodules) in various parts of the body, lung disease, blood disorders, and osteoporosis. The disease affects all ethnic groups throughout the world; it is a heterogeneous and progressive autoimmune disease [1] .

Prevalence figures vary depending on the source of information and the method of classifying rheumatoid arthritis. Definite RA was observed in 1% of population samples in Iraq [2] . The greatest decline in function generally occurred within the first two years of disease onset. After progressing quickly, the rate of functional decline usually started to taper off [3] .

Over the past two decades, a growing emphasis has been put on arthritis self-management strategies to help patients with RA to cope with the consequences of the disease [4] [5] .

Therapeutic education is a set of activities designed to increase patients’ knowledge about the disease [6] , to help them to organize the treatment regimens and to acquire the abilities necessary for self-management of the consequences of the disease [7] .

In Iraq, it was assumed that RA patients had some knowledge about their disease and its consequences, that the educational standard of the patients may influence the amount of knowledge and awareness of the disease, and that the frequency of hospital admissions may add to this knowledge. This study is probably the first one to verify these assumptions.

2. Patients and Methods

This was a cross-sectional study. All patients with an established diagnosis of RA who have access to the Department of Rheumatology in Baghdad Teaching Hospital, a tertiary referral center in Iraq were included. The diagnosis of RA depends on fulfilling the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Criteria for the classification of RA [1] .

Data collection took place between September 2011 and March 2012. A systematic random sample of 100 patients with RA was recruited.

2.1. Ethical Considerations

The study was granted full ethical approval from the Directorate General of Medical City Committee for Medical Ethics and Research. A signed informed consent was secured from all study participants. Privacy was assured during personal interview and identifying information was concealed during statistical analyses.

2.2. Data Collection

Patient’s data were obtained by personal interview performed by the fourth author. RA disease-related data, such as disease duration, drug use (all anti-rheumatic drugs, glucocorticoids use and non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)), physiotherapy, were collected.

Disease activity was measured using the Disease Activity Score based on evaluation of 28 joints (DAS28) [8] . A score of DAS28 ≤ 5.1 is considered as the cut-off for low disease activity (including mild and moderate activity), whereas DAS28 > 5.1 is considered as high disease activity.

Functional status was assessed according to the criteria for classification of functional status in rheumatoid arthritis [8] . The demographic characteristics included age, gender, marital status, occupation, academic level, number of years with RA, and socioeconomic status.

The scale used in the current study for measuring correct knowledge and favorable attitude was locally developed by the research team to match the level of comprehension for the majority of patients visiting the outpatient Rheumatology clinic in a governmental (free of charge) hospital.

Validity was assessed by the consensus of a panel of 5 senior Rheumatologists with long experience in dealing with local patients. A statistical assessment of reliability was not suitable, since the total score represents a summation of widely variable domains of knowledge and attitude.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS version 20) software was used. Frequency distribution for selected variables was done first. The statistical significance of difference in mean between 2 groups was assessed by independent samples t-test, while between more than 2 groups ANOVA test was used. Quantitative variables were converted into ordered categorical variables using the unbiased method of “Quintiles”. P value less than the 0.05 level of significance was considered statistically significant. The statistical significance, direction and strength of linear correlation between 2 quantitative variables, one of which being non-normally distributed was measured by Spearman’s rank linear correlation coefficient

3. Results

There were 100 patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Majority of patients were females (83%) aged (40 - 59) years. More than two thirds (69%) of patients were married, housewives constituted 64% of the total sample. Illiterates constituted a noticeable proportion (31%), while only 16% had university level of education, Table 1.

The disease severity indices were also summarized in Table 2; 40% of the patients were of functional class II,

Table 1. Frequency distribution of the study sample by socio-demographic variables.

Table 2. Frequency distribution of the study sample by disease severity indices.

34% had class III and 16% in class I and 10% in class IV. Disease Activity indices were also summarized in the same table, as well as the frequency of hospital admissions.

The patient’s knowledge and attitude to selected items were summarized by Table 3. Twenty percent didn’t know why the investigations were needed, 40% of patients didn’t know the side effect of the medications, while 49% of cases didn’t have knowledge about treatment types, Table 3. It had been found that only 6% correctly identify the nature of RA as autoimmune disease, Table 4.

The total score of the knowledge and attitude was calculated by summing the scores shown in Table 4 and Table 5.

The calculation of total knowledge and attitude score depends on summing the scores on items presented in the heading of Table 4 and Table 5 for each study subject. Each item in Table 4 is given a score of 1 for correct knowledge item and favorable attitude item, while a score of 1 to 2 is given to each item in Table 5 depending on the amount (extent) of correct knowledge in each knowledge domain. For the sake of making the score easily substantiated, the total score is weighted again to have a maximum of 10 instead of 13 by multiplying the score resulting from summation process by (10/13).

It was revealed that about 76% of the patients had a total score of less than 5 (the maximum score is 10), and the remaining 24% had a total score of 5 - 8, Table 6.

Age, gender, Academic level, disease duration, activity and severity in addition frequency of hospital admissions had no important association with knowledge or attitude towards RA, Table 7.

4. Discussion

Females were consisting of the majority of the patients (83%). These findings are in line with other studies and

Table 3. Frequency distribution of the patient’s responses to selected knowledge and attitude items (patient’s perspectives and awareness).

literatures; Jorit et al. [9] and Verstappen et al. [10] who found that the majority of cases were females (86%) with a median age of (53) year.

Housewives formed (64%) of the study sample, quite different from western countries, this obviously is due to the differences in cultural and environmental factors between our society and the western societies [4] [5] .

Table 4. Relative frequency of patient’s correct knowledge and favorable attitude towards the disease.

Table 5. Frequency distribution of the study sample by score evaluation of selected knowledge items.

Table 6. Cumulative frequency distribution of total knowledge and attitude score.

Table 7. The mean total knowledge and attitude score by selected independent variables.

The educational level of the patients was distributed into 5 categories: (31%) illiterates, (10%) read and write, (25%) primary school, (18%) secondary school and (16%) of cases had university level of education (Table 1); this coincides with findings of other studies [5] -[7] .

Historically, a study from Iraq (Al-Jumaili et al. 1998) [11] was the first to address the educational level of patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis. His study didn’t address the disease activity of the patients, but emphasized on the social and economic burden on the families of the sufferers, which is different from the scope of our study.

The total scores of the knowledge and attitude of the patients had revealed that about 76% of the cases had a total score less than 5 (the maximum is 10) and the remaining 24% of the cases had a total score of 5 - 8. In general About 80% of the patients had the knowledge about at least one indication for lab investigation, 49% of the patients did correctly identify one or more side effects of medication while 51% did not identify any side effect of the medications they were regularly taking. Interestingly, 54% of the patients couldn’t identify even one type of drugs that they were regularly taking.

These findings were closer to that of Hill et al. (UK) [12] , who found that 62% of patients knew that the cause of RA is, as yet, unknown but 27% thought it could be caused by injury and 11% by cold damp weather. Fifty two percent of the patients had no idea why they had blood tests. Almost all patients were taking some form of medication but there was widespread confusion about disease-modifying drugs and non-steroidal anti-inflam- matory drugs (NSAlDs) [12] .

Two interesting outcomes from this study were as follows: the first one is that illiterate patients had a mean knowledge and attitude scores of (3.9), which was not different from those who had a college certificate! This shows the need for patient’s education about RA. The other interesting finding was that successive hospital admissions didn’t make any difference to the total knowledge and attitude scores, i.e. those who had at least two admissions in hospital had an almost similar knowledge to those who were never admitted into the hospital. This reflects the lack of enthusiasm towards patient’s education and counseling on the part of the medical and nursing staff.

5. Conclusions

· Patients’ knowledge about RA was clearly deficient (more than 3 quarters had less than 50% of correct knowledge and favorable attitude).

· Age, gender, educational level, disease duration, activity and severity in addition to count of hospital admissions had no important relations with knowledge or attitude towards RA.


Formal patients education sessions may enhance the patients’ awareness of the treatment and hence compliance, and might achieve better results in reducing the disease severity.


  1. Waldenburger, J.M. and Firestein, G.S. (2008) Rheumatoid Arthritis. In: Klippel, J.H., Stone, J.H., Crofford, L.J. and White, P.H., Eds., Primer on Rheumatic Diseases, 13th, Springer Science and Business Media, New York, 122-32.
  2. Al-Rawi, Z.S., Alazzawi, A.J., Al-Ajilli, F.M., et al. (1978) Rheumatoid Arthritis in Population Samples in Iraq. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseasess, 37, 73-75.
  3. Hallert, E., Thyberg, I. and Hass, U. (2003) Comparison between Women and Men with Recent Onset Rheumatoid Arthritis of Disease Activity and Functional Ability over Two Years (the TIRA Project). Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 62, 667-670.
  4. Isenberg, D.A. (2004) Oxford Textbook of Rheumatology. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  5. Taal, E., Rasker, J.J. and Wiegman, O. (1996) Patient Education and Self-Management in the Rheumatic Diseases: A Self-Efficacy Approach. Arthritis & Rheumatism, 9, 229-238.<229::AID-ANR1790090312>3.0.CO;2-U
  6. Golay, A., Lagger, G., Chambouleyron, M., et al. (2005) Therapeutic Education of the Diabetic Patient. Diabetes/Me- tabolism Research and Reviews, 60, 599-603.
  7. Tall, E., Rasker, J.J. and Wiegman, O. (2007) Group Education for Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients. Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism, 26, 805-816.
  8. van der Heijde, D.M., van’t Hof, M.A., van Riel, P.L., et al. (1990) Judging Disease Activity in Clinical Practice in Rheumatoid Arthritis: First Step in the Development of a Disease Activity Score. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseasess, 49, 916-920.
  9. Meesters, J.J.L., Theodora, P.M., Ylieland, V., Hill, J. and Ndosi, M.E. (2009) Measuring Educational Needs among Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Using the Dutch Version of the Educational Needs Assessment Tool (DENAT). Clinical Rheumatology, 28, 1073-1077
  10. Verstappen, S.M.M., et al. (2007) Trends in Economic Consequences of Rheumatoid Arthritis over Two Subsequent Years. Rheumatology, 46, 968-974.
  11. Al-Jumaily, H.F., Salman, S. and Al-Tawil, W. (1998) Physical and Social Activities Influencing Family Relationships among Married Female Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis. A Dissertation Submitted to the Scientific Council of Community Medicine.
  12. Hill, J., Bird, H.A., Hopkins, R., Lawton, C. and Wright, V. (1991) The Development and Use of a Patient Knowledge Questionnaire in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Rheumatology, 30, 45-49.